Group dynamics
-
Upload
kuaci-pedas -
Category
Business
-
view
687 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Group dynamics
GROUP DYNAMICS
PERSONAL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT -23126Z
GROUP DYNAMICS is the study of groups, and also a general term
for group processes a group is two or more individuals who are
connected to each other by social relationships. understanding of the behavior of people in
groups, such as task groups, that are trying to solve a problem or make a decision.
KEY THEORISTS
Gustave Le Bon Sigmund Freud Jacob L. Moreno Kurt Lewin William Schutz Bruce Tuckman
TUCKMAN'S MODEL :5 STAGES OF GROUP DEVELOPMENT
1) Forming :characterized by some confusion and uncertainty .
2) Storming :likely to see the highest level of disagreement and conflict
3) Norming : recognition of individual differences and shared expectations
4) Performing: group has matured and attains a feeling of cohesiveness
5) Adjourning: the dissolution of a group
STAGE 1: FORMING The major goals of the groups have not
been established Task or leadership has not been
determined An orientation period when members get
to know one another and shared expectations
Trust and openness has not been developed
STAGE 2: STORMING Members challenge group goals Vie for leadership position Voice concern and criticism If conflict cannot be resolved, the group
will disband or continue existence ineffectively.
STAGE 3: NORMING Recognition of individual differences
and shared expectations Develop a feeling of group cohesion
and identity More cooperative among members of
the group Responsibilities are divided among
members
STAGE 4: PERFORMING Everyone knows each other well
enough to be able to work together Trusts each other enough to allow
independent activity. Conflict is resolved through group
discussion Make decisions through a rational
process not emotionally.
STAGE 5: ADJOURNING Completion/accomplishment of a task Disengagement- individuals deciding to
go their own ways Often experience feelings of closure
and sadness
GROUP TYPES
Formal Established by an organization to achieve its goals.
Informal Formed naturally in response to the common interests and shared values of individuals
Formal Groups1) Command Groups :
specified by organizational chart2) Task Groups :
consists of people working together to achieve a common task
3) Functional Groups : created by organization to accomplish
specific goals within an unspecified time frame
Informal Groups1. Interest Group:
Continue over time and may last longer.
Members may not be part of the same department but are bound together by common interest
Eg study group for a specific class
INFORMAL GROUPS –1. Interest group:
Continue over time and may last longer.
Members may not be part of the same department but are bound together by common interest
Eg study group for a specific class
Informal Groups2. Friendship Groups:
Formed by members who enjoy similar social activities, political beliefs, religious value
Enjoy each other’s company Eg. Exercise group, softball team, potluck
lunch once a month
Informal Groups3. Reference Groups:
People use to evaluate themselves Social validation: allows individuals to
justify their attitudes and values social comparison: evaluate own actions
by comparing to others Strong influence on members’ behaviour Family, friends and religious affiliation are
strong reference groups for most individuals.
GROUP STRUCTURE A pattern of relationship among
members that holds the group together to achieve its assigned goals.
Can be described as Group size Group roles Group norms Group cohesiveness
Group Size Vary from 2 people to a very large
number Small groups of 2 – 10 people are more
effective because of ample opportunity to participate
Increasing the size of the groups results in decreased satisfaction because it is difficult to experience cohesion.
GROUP ROLES Work roles: task oriented activities that
involve accomplishing the group’s goals
Maintenance roles: social-emotional activities such as harmonizer who will reduce tension in the group.
Blocking roles: activities that disrupt the group such as aggressor criticizes members’ value and make jokes in a sarcastic manner.
Group Norms Norms define the boundaries of
acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.
Reflect the level of commitment, motivation, and performance of the group.