Group Assignment - China #4 - Lenovo
-
Upload
mohammad-umar-gul-gulzar -
Category
Documents
-
view
203 -
download
1
Transcript of Group Assignment - China #4 - Lenovo
Copenhagen Business School 26092011
Lenovo assignment
The Company in its Historical and International Setting
BSc in International Business
China 4
Danni G Gregersen
Finn Jannik Schmidt
Maria Rahamaumlgi
Mohammad Umar G Gulzar
Morten-Bo Paulsen
Lenovo 26092011
2 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Abstract
The first objective of this paper is to give an overview of Chinese capitalism and its
development Furthermore the paper aims to explain how Lenovo became a market leader
and to which extend this was due to the development of the Chinese capitalism Moreover it
identifies Schumpeterian ldquocreative responsesrdquo and points out how these give reasons for
Lenovorsquos survival and growth in a competitive global market
Chinese capitalism has moved since its induction by Xiaopingrsquos reforms in 1978 from degree
four on McCrawrsquos scale of government intervention towards degree three The down-rating in
government intervention reflects the movement from a communist society towards a market-
based economy which can also be reflected in Lenovorsquos history
The reforms and the movement have among other things had a great impact on Lenovo
becoming a market leader Finally the paper shows how the Chinese capitalism has moved
through various phases of government intervention and how the placement on McCrawrsquos
scale has to be adjusted throughout this progress
Lenovo 26092011
3 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Contents
Abstract 2
Introduction 4
Background 5
Chinarsquos history in short and a clear definition of Chinese capitalism 5
Communism 5
Xiaoping 5
Theory 6
McCrawrsquos Scale 6
Schumpeter ndash the entreprenuer 7
The present nature of Chinese capitalism 7
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative reponses 11
Introduction 11
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer 11
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive 13
Chinese movement through various degrees 18
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo 18
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism 21
Conclusion 22
Schumpeterian 23
China and Lenovo 24
Literature List 25
Web articles 25
Lenovo 26092011
4 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Introduction
The financial crisis has hit the Western capitalist economies very hard and most of these find
themselves now in economic depressions However this tremendous crisis has not been
able to shock the Chinese economy which has still an extremely high annual growth rate
China continues to grow already to the second largest economy of the world in 2010 after
USA
What makes China especially interesting is the fact that the country has been able to
combine their communistic political conviction and change the economy from a closed plan
economy into an economy with more and more capitalistic characteristics What is more the
communistic roots give Chinese capitalism a number of benefits compared to old capitalistic
countries For example the fact that Chinese managements are able to make decision faster
as they are less tied to the shareholders However the Chinese rise is not over On average
the income level in China is increasing but this hides an increasing inequality between the
rural and the urban areas China has over four times Americarsquos population it only has to
produce a quarter of Americarsquos output per head to exceed Americarsquos total output and it has
been estimated that by 2016 the Chinese economy will surpass the US economy and
thereby become the biggest economy in the world China is an emerging economy and is
therefore an interesting country that is likely to change the world order in the future At least
a lot of economists talks about the economic power moving to the east
It is interesting to look at the Chinese variation of capitalism because it is so contrary to the
Western capitalism A common Western belief is that a free market political freedom and
limited power of the state are the best combination to secure growth However the Chinese
variation of capitalism has shown that the Western belief is not necessarily the only answer
It is also interesting to see how Chinese companies act in the Chinese variation of capitalism
where many of the worldrsquos biggest multinational enterprises (MNEs) have now emerged
This paper shows what characterizes the present nature of the Chinese capitalism and
illustrates where on a McCrawrsquos scale between ldquolaissez-fairerdquo with minimal state intervention
and ldquothorough state management and decision-making for the whole economyrdquo the current
Chinese economy is placed It also examines the fact that China has moved through various
degrees throughout the history Later on this paper turns its focus to Lenovo and describes
how Lenovo became a market leader by 1997 only six years after its first computer was
manufactured In this context it is interesting to look at the possible creative and adaptive
responses according to Joseph Schumpeter made by Lenovo Furthermore this paper
looks at how these ldquoSchumpeterian decisionsrdquo secured Lenovorsquos growth and survival in an
Lenovo 26092011
5 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
ever changing and extremely competitive industry In the end the paper combines the
development of Lenovo and reflects it to the development of the Chinese capitalism
Background
Chinarsquos history in short and a clear definition of Chinese capitalism
Communism
After establishing the Peoplersquos Republic of China in 1949 Mao Zedong managed to organise
the administration and rebuild the economy that had suffered from decades of war in just five
years The new state nationalised the countryrsquos banking system and brought all currency and
credit under centralised control It regulated prices and boosted government revenues by
collecting agricultural taxes By the mid-1950s the communists had rebuilt and expanded the
countryrsquos railroad and highway systems boosted agricultural and industrial production to
their pre-war levels and brought Chinarsquos industry and commerce under direct state control
After the land reform agricultural collectives were reorganized into enormous communes
where wages were calculated according to the principle bdquoto each according to his needsrdquo and
side-line production was banned Procurement prices were too low to cover the production
costs and ceilings were set on the amount of grain that producers could keep for
consumption Over-ambiguous targets and thus falsified production figures let the officials
live in an unreal world of production increases The Great Leap Forward had become a giant
step backwards
By the 1960 the situation had come so serious that Mao had to step side-lines By then
large areas of China were in famine people were exhausted and GDP had declined about
one-third For the next several years agricultural and industrial production returned to normal
levels and labour productivity began to rise
Mao reasserted his power in 1966 and started to bdquoput China back on trackldquo Universities and
schools were closed intellectuals were harassed and any sign of capitalism was enough to
condemn someone as a foe of the Communist Party By 1969 the country was back in
anarchy and the economy was again going downwards
Xiaoping
Chinarsquos next leader Deng Xiaoping who replaced Mao after his death in 1976 started
quickly reforming the country Communes were broken up and replaced with leasing
systems state procurement prices were raised and the Communist Party China (CPC) left
many prices of agricultural goods to be dictated by the market Farmers were allowed to
Lenovo 26092011
6 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
produce on their own and sell the surplus on the newly freed markets to retain any profits
they might earn which gave them an incentive to produce more efficiently so by the end of
the decade the production had grown by roughly 30 per cent Deng also attacked Chinarsquos
food shortages by encouraging families to adopt the one-child policy
Along with the changes in the countryside China started to open up to the rest of the world
Four special economic zones were created which attracted foreign investors with tax
incentives foreign exchange provisions and a lack of regulation By the late 1980s the
government began to open the doors even more aggressively by giving foreign investors
more control of factories long-term land leases and permitting dual exchange rate In 1984
the state applied the dual-price system also to many other industrial products By 1988 both
industrial and agricultural production had reached to new heights with the first one
increasing a fifth annually although state budget continued to support loss-making SOEs In
1989 the government proved the ability to keep its economy under control with wide-scale
retrenchment which saved the country from inflationary spiral Due to the reforms foreign
direct investment to China rose to $112 billion by 1992 two and a half fold increase
compared to the previous year Along the way however the ldquorectificationrdquo program
unleashed a violent series of political events by which the Chinese Communist Party
signalled that despite the liberalising reforms it had no intention of letting loose the reins of
control
With these reforms Chinese communism was in gradual transformation to Chinese
capitalism
Theory
In this section of the paper we describe the theories which create the foundation of the
paper The paper mainly consists of two important theories McCrawrsquos scale and
Schumpeterrsquos entreprenuer theory The two theories are briefly described in the following
McCrawrsquos Scale
McCrawrsquos scale is a scale of four degrees (McCraw 1997)
1 Laissez faire with minimal state intervention
2 frequent uncoordinated state intervention in a mostly free market
3 systematic state guidance of private decision-making
4 through state management and decision-making for the whole economy
Lenovo 26092011
7 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
This scale can be used in order to analyze a countryrsquos nature of capitalism at a certain time
The fourth degree is a plan economy where supply and demand are not controlling
production Instead the production is guided by the state This degree is for instance where
a communist state would be placed At the other end of the scale is the ldquolaissez-fairerdquo degree
where the state intervention is at its minimal On this degree it is supply and demand that
control the market In between we have ldquofrequent but uncoordinated intervention in a mostly
free marketrdquo This is the degree most capitalist countries have Furthermore there is the
ldquosystematic state guidancerdquo left In this degree the state plays a big role but supply and
demand still control many markets State ownership is normal in this degree In this paper we
have used this scale in order to analyze the present nature of Chinese capitalism
Schumpeter ndash the entreprenuer
Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950) presented a theory which suggested that the entreprenuer
plays a big role in the economic development (Joseph Schumpeter 1947) The entreprenuer
creates both adaptive responses and creative responses The creative reponses causes
bdquocreative destructionldquo as it destroys the way certain things used to be done until then in a
certain industry The creative response can not be predicted and is something that creates
new pratices outside the existing practices of the industry
Schumpeter acknowledges the inventer innovator etc however Schumpeter favours the
entreprenuer who actually gets things done Hence Schumpeter was much more interested
in the one who commercialized a product not in the one who invented it An example is the
steam engine which was invented in the 16th century but not commercialized until the early
18th century Until an idea is commercialized it does not matter in an economic perspective
It is worth mentioning that according to Schumpeter it is essential that the entreprenuer has
motivations for doing what heshe does The ability to retain profits is very important in this
context
The present nature of Chinese capitalism
Looking at the present nature of capitalism China must be seen as a state in transition and
the current situation is difficult to define After the harsh reign of Mao Zedong (1949-1976)
the country started its transition in 1978 when Deng implemented the first reforms ldquoand [it]
received a decisive push from 1992 onwardsrdquo1 with the reforms of the 1990s
1 httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
8 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
The implementation of capitalism by a communist party into a communist system is
compulsorily a difficult process The CPC has often been stuck between maintaining
communist values and keeping up the implementation of capitalism This contradiction might
get clearer by a concrete example The Chinese president said in the National Peoplersquos
Congress that the priorities now are promoting equality in education opportunities adopting
progressive employment policies narrowing income gaps and building social security
networks9 Promoting capitalist reforms and keeping up the extraordinary growth brings
does not allow these priorities though and increasing inequality between the benefitting
developed urban areas and the underprivileged rural regions is one of the consequences this
growth has Urging further reforms and heading the country towards being more capitalistic
is clear evidence that ldquoChinarsquos communists have long since given up on true communismrdquo2
The reforms have promoted privatization Foreign Direct Investment private property and
many more capitalist characteristics most of these are only advantageous for the already
developed emerging cities along the Chinese coast To give an example of an achievement
reached by the reforms the Chinese private sector now accounts for approximately 70 of
gross domestic product3 today However the country is only midway through the process
and there are more reforms likely to be made For instance ldquothe capital markets and
securities markets still are underdeveloped because 70 of shares of almost all listed
companies are not tradablerdquo3 The fact that ldquoan experimental program was announced to
make the non-tradable shares tradablerdquo3 illustrates that the CPC also intends to implement
further liberal capitalist characteristics into the Chinese type of capitalism besides trying to
decrease inequality which underlines the contradiction Participating in the global trade made
China join the WTO in 2001 which has enforced China to become more liberal and
capitalistic in terms of their tariffs quotas and licensing requirements The Communist Party
China makes use of any measures in order to preserve the economic upward movement and
ensure the social stability
The Chinese history with long periods of war and the Japanese occupation are still in the
peoplersquos minds which reason the thankfulness for the stability that the CPC has brought the
Chinese in the last decades Hence stability is Chinarsquos highest valued ldquocommodityrdquo and has
had a great influence on the development of Chinese capitalism and thereby also explains
the capitalist environment today For instance the fact that China has pegged their currency
the Yuan to the American dollar and are not willing to let it float which would adjust its value
can be explained by the importance the CPC see in keeping up the economic stability In his
2 httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
3 httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
9 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
report for the American Congress the American economist Wayne M Morrison mentions
ldquoChina continues to ldquomanipulaterdquo its currency in order to give its exporters an unfair trade
advantagerdquo4 An adjustment of their currency would disable the Chinese from keeping their
exports at the current level The increasing exports have earned China the title of the worldrsquos
largest exporter5 and are essential for their economic growth Decreasing exports would
affect the growth rate which then would threaten the countryrsquos stability This shows how the
fear of instability impacts the Chinese decision-making and thereby the present capitalist
environment
Furthermore the influence the growing regional disparity has on the governmentsrsquo decision-
making are another evidence that proves the valuation of stability ldquoBetween 1990 and 2005
Chinarsquos Gini coefficient rose from 0257 to 0447rdquo6 seriously endangering the social stability
in China However as ldquothe countryrsquos phenomenal growth and increasing global heft are
based on a steady [hellip] transition to capitalismrdquo7 and a slowdown or even stagnation of the
countryrsquos growth rate would mean an even greater threat for the countryrsquos stability ldquothe
Communist Party was not willing to slow down growth to address inequality or to leave the
balance purely to market forcesrdquo8 This shows again the huge interest the CPC and the
Peoplersquos Republic of China has in the countryrsquos stability and how it influences important
political decision-making The current growth rate is to a great extend caused by the
capitalist reforms and the slow liberalisation of the Chinese economy This process of
transition will stop at some point though The Chinese are aware that they find themselves in
times of transition and the current growth rate will not last forever which is why Chinarsquos
president promised at the National Peoplersquos Congress (NPC) to ldquofocus more on sustainable
development than rapid economic growthrdquo9
Although the Communist Party China builds up a Chinese capitalism upon a communist
system and embeds many capitalist characteristics in it the state still intervenes a lot to
regulate and control the market The CPC is extremely focussed on keeping the role of the
directive actor They give the pace of moving from a plan economy towards a market-based
economy and the only liberalise the economy to the degree they think is best The state- 4 httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
5 httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-
1864052html 23092011 6 httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
7 httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
8httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Chara
cteristicspdf p14 20092011 9 httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
10 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
owned enterprises that emerged under Maorsquos communist regime and that were characterized
as inefficient over-staffed and not profit-driven have become more efficient less indebted
and through implementation of managers much more profit-driven Nevertheless just as
back at Maorsquos times the CPC uses them as state tools to keep the economy on track
Despite the fact that China has still a lot of government intervention they achieved to enter
the WTO in 200110The entry in the WTO was a push towards more liberalization With the
entry in the WTO China clearly signalised their global orientation and adapting to
international agreements signalised the increasingly important role China is going to play in
the global economy Joining the WTO and adapting to the international rules of exchange
China is facing the global competition now much more than before and the CPC has had to
engage privatization of the SOEs to increase their competitiveness so that the Chinese
economy has been able to maintain their extraordinary growth rate
The present Chinese capitalist environment is very difficult to place on the McCrawrsquos scale of
government intervention On the one hand China is still a communist one-party state
governed by a party which intervenes in the economy to regulate and control the market
According to these facts thorough state management guides China and the state has the
power of decision-making for the whole economy which would mean the Chinese capitalism
had to be placed on the scale at degree 4 However on the other hand the CPC has
dropped most of their communist ideals and keeps transmitting the country by various
reforms into a market-based capitalism Presently the Chinese capitalism fulfils most of the
criteria that characterize capitalism such as labour as a commodity private property a
financial system and a currency The government promotes privatization and makes itself
dependant of international laws which is clear evidence for a decrease in government
intervention The transition towards a common market for example through a reform in the
banking sector which is likely to occur soon keeps moving the Chinese economy towards
capitalism with a systematic state guidance of private decision-making McCrawrsquos degree
number 3 Nevertheless the degree of liberalization is still under complete control of the
CPC and the economy is only as free as the party intends it to be Theoretically the
Communist Party China could rapidly decrease the degree to which the economy is
liberalized change laws and abolish the law that allows for example the property rights
which ensure a capitalist economy This is of course not very likely to happen but it is
important to point out that the whole Chinese capitalist system originates from the
governmentrsquos reforms and guidance Although these reforms have been pushed through and
the Chinese capitalism is more and more liberalized and taken towards a free market-based
10
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
Lenovo 26092011
11 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
economy political freedom is still not given and probably will not be in the close future which
is why China is currently placed on the McCrawrsquos scale of government intervention between
degree 4 and 3 Due to decreasing government intervention it is moving towards degree 3
though Without political freedom which would guarantee economic freedom property rights
and allow competition of law the Chinese capitalism cannot move any further than degree 3
on McCrawrsquos scale
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative
reponses
Introduction
There are many reasons why Lenovo has become one of the most dominant market leaders
in China as well as in the rest of the world One of the most important events in the Lenovorsquos
corporate history was the acquisition of the IBM personal Computing Division in 2005 which
enabled the company to become a competitive computer manufacture both domestically and
internationally Furthermore throughout Lenovorsquos history the state has been a major
stockholder in the company ndash and like other Chinese State supported enterprises ndash the
Chinese government has supported and protected Lenovo by indirect subsidiaries and
policies which made Lenovo capable of maintaining its dominance When analyzing how
Lenovo managed to develop its organization in a nation that has been marked by serious
economic and politic instability it is important to understand the entrepreneurial spirit that
has driven the company throughout its history Innovation and technological development
have been the core factors that contributed to the strong positioning of the Lenovo Group
Limited as being one of the pioneers in the global computer industry These different
strategic initiatives are somehow all exemplifies for different responses that Lenovo has
made in order survive the demanding IT-industry which is strongly affected by both the
globalization and liberalization of the Chinese market along with the very special type of
capitalism that characterizes the Chinese economy
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer
To start with Lenovo was owned by Legend Holdings Limited until 1994 when it was listed
on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong11 In March 2011 57 of Lenovo was owned by
public shareholders 42 by Legend Holdings Ltd and 1 by the directors12 The
11
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_cid=72 2009-11 12
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
Lenovo 26092011
12 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companyrsquos previous state ownership has implicitly contributed to Lenovorsquos success given the
advantage Lenovo has gained in the domestic market due to the one party-system that has
favoured strong domestic enterprises Although the Chinese government targeted the PC
industry as a national priority in the 1980rsquos Lenovo was not among those companies
selected by the government to be nurtured as the foundation of Chinarsquos future PC industry
Therefore Lenovo was not a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) in its true sense given that it
did not directly receive state support eg Lenovo did not receive a licence to produce PCs
until 199113 Despite the fact that Lenovo was not considered an ldquoordinaryrdquo SOE it still relied
on its parentrsquos the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) labs for the Research and
Development which it could use free of charge Lenovorsquos first production was developed at
ICT whom also facilitated Lenovorsquos first production experience by loaning their personnel
during the process ICT with its links to the government through the CAS supported Lenovo
in its early survival and thus the Chinese state played a significant role in the companyrsquos
early maintenance and growth
As Lenovo made its first Personal Computer under its own brand name in 1991 the
company suddenly became more important in the eyes of the government In 1994 the
company was celebrating its one millionth PC built14 In the same year it was revealed that
domestic computer companies such as Lenovo were going to be protected under a new
policy which was announced by the Chinese ministry of Electronics Lenovo was included in
Chinas ninth Five Year Plan - from 1996 to 2000 - as a key entity to be supported by
government policies15 During the ninth Five Year Plan China invested over $12 billion in the
909 Project which is the most expensive government effort for developing an advanced
semiconductor industry in China16 As a result of the government intervention Lenovo also
received an amount of the subsidy and eventually became the Chinese market leader in
1997 even surpassing IBM The latter was one of the main reasons for IBM to sell its PC
division to Lenovo The fact that Lenovo was able to grow with the indirect support of the
Chinese government reflects the special kind of capitalism that exist in the Chinese
economy Lenovo was operating on a free global market and at the same time enjoying the
beneficial protectionism and subsidies provided by the communist government The
13
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 2109-11 14
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 21092011
16 httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p169033-
19php page 19 21092011
Lenovo 26092011
13 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
legislation also provided the legal framework that would eventually make the acquisition of
IBM possible The law stated that foreign companies who wanted access to China could
only do so by cooperating with a Chinese company This rule was implemented so ensure
that Chinese companies gained eg know-how on technology
Lenovorsquos success started gradually in 1987 when the company expanded its activities to
distribution first for AST (the leading foreign brand in China at that time) and later adding
Hewlett-Packard Toshiba and IBM to its list17 Chuanzh the former CEO even went to the
extent of saying that ldquoOur earliest and best teacher was Hewlett-Packerrdquo18 What Chuanzh
wanted to empathize was that multinational companies such as HP were not only a source of
revenue for Lenovo but also a source of learning By distributing foreign-made PCs Lenovo
learned how to organize sales channels and merchandise PCs on a competitive market
Thus Lenovo began to comprehend its Chinese customers and the PC purchasing habits
making this a key for its dominance in the market for the upcoming years
The demand for computer technology became pervasive during the Third Industrial
Revolution which naturally benefited all computer manufactures around the world A lot of
Chinese industries had not yet reached the industrialization level of the western world
however the IT-industry is an exception The Chinese IT-industry plays a great part in the
Third Industrial Revolution where the immense increase in volume of international trade
investment and finance frequently has been centred in China In addition one could
therefore argue that Lenovo came on the right time with its first PC in 1991 in the exact same
period of history where demand for computer technology increased explaining its enormous
success both in the domestic and international market Lenovo already had a wide network
of distributors at that time and gained great insight in the Chinese consumption pattern
which gave them a huge advantage compared to their strongest competitors Thus it is
necessary to stress the importance of the Third Industrial Revolution as it created a market
Lenovo knew how to profit from by using its competitive advantages
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive
The various Schumpeterian responses that have been made in Lenovorsquos corporate history
enable us to explain how Lenovo became one of the market leaders in the IT-industry The
17
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 19092011 18
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
2 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Abstract
The first objective of this paper is to give an overview of Chinese capitalism and its
development Furthermore the paper aims to explain how Lenovo became a market leader
and to which extend this was due to the development of the Chinese capitalism Moreover it
identifies Schumpeterian ldquocreative responsesrdquo and points out how these give reasons for
Lenovorsquos survival and growth in a competitive global market
Chinese capitalism has moved since its induction by Xiaopingrsquos reforms in 1978 from degree
four on McCrawrsquos scale of government intervention towards degree three The down-rating in
government intervention reflects the movement from a communist society towards a market-
based economy which can also be reflected in Lenovorsquos history
The reforms and the movement have among other things had a great impact on Lenovo
becoming a market leader Finally the paper shows how the Chinese capitalism has moved
through various phases of government intervention and how the placement on McCrawrsquos
scale has to be adjusted throughout this progress
Lenovo 26092011
3 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Contents
Abstract 2
Introduction 4
Background 5
Chinarsquos history in short and a clear definition of Chinese capitalism 5
Communism 5
Xiaoping 5
Theory 6
McCrawrsquos Scale 6
Schumpeter ndash the entreprenuer 7
The present nature of Chinese capitalism 7
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative reponses 11
Introduction 11
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer 11
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive 13
Chinese movement through various degrees 18
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo 18
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism 21
Conclusion 22
Schumpeterian 23
China and Lenovo 24
Literature List 25
Web articles 25
Lenovo 26092011
4 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Introduction
The financial crisis has hit the Western capitalist economies very hard and most of these find
themselves now in economic depressions However this tremendous crisis has not been
able to shock the Chinese economy which has still an extremely high annual growth rate
China continues to grow already to the second largest economy of the world in 2010 after
USA
What makes China especially interesting is the fact that the country has been able to
combine their communistic political conviction and change the economy from a closed plan
economy into an economy with more and more capitalistic characteristics What is more the
communistic roots give Chinese capitalism a number of benefits compared to old capitalistic
countries For example the fact that Chinese managements are able to make decision faster
as they are less tied to the shareholders However the Chinese rise is not over On average
the income level in China is increasing but this hides an increasing inequality between the
rural and the urban areas China has over four times Americarsquos population it only has to
produce a quarter of Americarsquos output per head to exceed Americarsquos total output and it has
been estimated that by 2016 the Chinese economy will surpass the US economy and
thereby become the biggest economy in the world China is an emerging economy and is
therefore an interesting country that is likely to change the world order in the future At least
a lot of economists talks about the economic power moving to the east
It is interesting to look at the Chinese variation of capitalism because it is so contrary to the
Western capitalism A common Western belief is that a free market political freedom and
limited power of the state are the best combination to secure growth However the Chinese
variation of capitalism has shown that the Western belief is not necessarily the only answer
It is also interesting to see how Chinese companies act in the Chinese variation of capitalism
where many of the worldrsquos biggest multinational enterprises (MNEs) have now emerged
This paper shows what characterizes the present nature of the Chinese capitalism and
illustrates where on a McCrawrsquos scale between ldquolaissez-fairerdquo with minimal state intervention
and ldquothorough state management and decision-making for the whole economyrdquo the current
Chinese economy is placed It also examines the fact that China has moved through various
degrees throughout the history Later on this paper turns its focus to Lenovo and describes
how Lenovo became a market leader by 1997 only six years after its first computer was
manufactured In this context it is interesting to look at the possible creative and adaptive
responses according to Joseph Schumpeter made by Lenovo Furthermore this paper
looks at how these ldquoSchumpeterian decisionsrdquo secured Lenovorsquos growth and survival in an
Lenovo 26092011
5 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
ever changing and extremely competitive industry In the end the paper combines the
development of Lenovo and reflects it to the development of the Chinese capitalism
Background
Chinarsquos history in short and a clear definition of Chinese capitalism
Communism
After establishing the Peoplersquos Republic of China in 1949 Mao Zedong managed to organise
the administration and rebuild the economy that had suffered from decades of war in just five
years The new state nationalised the countryrsquos banking system and brought all currency and
credit under centralised control It regulated prices and boosted government revenues by
collecting agricultural taxes By the mid-1950s the communists had rebuilt and expanded the
countryrsquos railroad and highway systems boosted agricultural and industrial production to
their pre-war levels and brought Chinarsquos industry and commerce under direct state control
After the land reform agricultural collectives were reorganized into enormous communes
where wages were calculated according to the principle bdquoto each according to his needsrdquo and
side-line production was banned Procurement prices were too low to cover the production
costs and ceilings were set on the amount of grain that producers could keep for
consumption Over-ambiguous targets and thus falsified production figures let the officials
live in an unreal world of production increases The Great Leap Forward had become a giant
step backwards
By the 1960 the situation had come so serious that Mao had to step side-lines By then
large areas of China were in famine people were exhausted and GDP had declined about
one-third For the next several years agricultural and industrial production returned to normal
levels and labour productivity began to rise
Mao reasserted his power in 1966 and started to bdquoput China back on trackldquo Universities and
schools were closed intellectuals were harassed and any sign of capitalism was enough to
condemn someone as a foe of the Communist Party By 1969 the country was back in
anarchy and the economy was again going downwards
Xiaoping
Chinarsquos next leader Deng Xiaoping who replaced Mao after his death in 1976 started
quickly reforming the country Communes were broken up and replaced with leasing
systems state procurement prices were raised and the Communist Party China (CPC) left
many prices of agricultural goods to be dictated by the market Farmers were allowed to
Lenovo 26092011
6 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
produce on their own and sell the surplus on the newly freed markets to retain any profits
they might earn which gave them an incentive to produce more efficiently so by the end of
the decade the production had grown by roughly 30 per cent Deng also attacked Chinarsquos
food shortages by encouraging families to adopt the one-child policy
Along with the changes in the countryside China started to open up to the rest of the world
Four special economic zones were created which attracted foreign investors with tax
incentives foreign exchange provisions and a lack of regulation By the late 1980s the
government began to open the doors even more aggressively by giving foreign investors
more control of factories long-term land leases and permitting dual exchange rate In 1984
the state applied the dual-price system also to many other industrial products By 1988 both
industrial and agricultural production had reached to new heights with the first one
increasing a fifth annually although state budget continued to support loss-making SOEs In
1989 the government proved the ability to keep its economy under control with wide-scale
retrenchment which saved the country from inflationary spiral Due to the reforms foreign
direct investment to China rose to $112 billion by 1992 two and a half fold increase
compared to the previous year Along the way however the ldquorectificationrdquo program
unleashed a violent series of political events by which the Chinese Communist Party
signalled that despite the liberalising reforms it had no intention of letting loose the reins of
control
With these reforms Chinese communism was in gradual transformation to Chinese
capitalism
Theory
In this section of the paper we describe the theories which create the foundation of the
paper The paper mainly consists of two important theories McCrawrsquos scale and
Schumpeterrsquos entreprenuer theory The two theories are briefly described in the following
McCrawrsquos Scale
McCrawrsquos scale is a scale of four degrees (McCraw 1997)
1 Laissez faire with minimal state intervention
2 frequent uncoordinated state intervention in a mostly free market
3 systematic state guidance of private decision-making
4 through state management and decision-making for the whole economy
Lenovo 26092011
7 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
This scale can be used in order to analyze a countryrsquos nature of capitalism at a certain time
The fourth degree is a plan economy where supply and demand are not controlling
production Instead the production is guided by the state This degree is for instance where
a communist state would be placed At the other end of the scale is the ldquolaissez-fairerdquo degree
where the state intervention is at its minimal On this degree it is supply and demand that
control the market In between we have ldquofrequent but uncoordinated intervention in a mostly
free marketrdquo This is the degree most capitalist countries have Furthermore there is the
ldquosystematic state guidancerdquo left In this degree the state plays a big role but supply and
demand still control many markets State ownership is normal in this degree In this paper we
have used this scale in order to analyze the present nature of Chinese capitalism
Schumpeter ndash the entreprenuer
Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950) presented a theory which suggested that the entreprenuer
plays a big role in the economic development (Joseph Schumpeter 1947) The entreprenuer
creates both adaptive responses and creative responses The creative reponses causes
bdquocreative destructionldquo as it destroys the way certain things used to be done until then in a
certain industry The creative response can not be predicted and is something that creates
new pratices outside the existing practices of the industry
Schumpeter acknowledges the inventer innovator etc however Schumpeter favours the
entreprenuer who actually gets things done Hence Schumpeter was much more interested
in the one who commercialized a product not in the one who invented it An example is the
steam engine which was invented in the 16th century but not commercialized until the early
18th century Until an idea is commercialized it does not matter in an economic perspective
It is worth mentioning that according to Schumpeter it is essential that the entreprenuer has
motivations for doing what heshe does The ability to retain profits is very important in this
context
The present nature of Chinese capitalism
Looking at the present nature of capitalism China must be seen as a state in transition and
the current situation is difficult to define After the harsh reign of Mao Zedong (1949-1976)
the country started its transition in 1978 when Deng implemented the first reforms ldquoand [it]
received a decisive push from 1992 onwardsrdquo1 with the reforms of the 1990s
1 httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
8 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
The implementation of capitalism by a communist party into a communist system is
compulsorily a difficult process The CPC has often been stuck between maintaining
communist values and keeping up the implementation of capitalism This contradiction might
get clearer by a concrete example The Chinese president said in the National Peoplersquos
Congress that the priorities now are promoting equality in education opportunities adopting
progressive employment policies narrowing income gaps and building social security
networks9 Promoting capitalist reforms and keeping up the extraordinary growth brings
does not allow these priorities though and increasing inequality between the benefitting
developed urban areas and the underprivileged rural regions is one of the consequences this
growth has Urging further reforms and heading the country towards being more capitalistic
is clear evidence that ldquoChinarsquos communists have long since given up on true communismrdquo2
The reforms have promoted privatization Foreign Direct Investment private property and
many more capitalist characteristics most of these are only advantageous for the already
developed emerging cities along the Chinese coast To give an example of an achievement
reached by the reforms the Chinese private sector now accounts for approximately 70 of
gross domestic product3 today However the country is only midway through the process
and there are more reforms likely to be made For instance ldquothe capital markets and
securities markets still are underdeveloped because 70 of shares of almost all listed
companies are not tradablerdquo3 The fact that ldquoan experimental program was announced to
make the non-tradable shares tradablerdquo3 illustrates that the CPC also intends to implement
further liberal capitalist characteristics into the Chinese type of capitalism besides trying to
decrease inequality which underlines the contradiction Participating in the global trade made
China join the WTO in 2001 which has enforced China to become more liberal and
capitalistic in terms of their tariffs quotas and licensing requirements The Communist Party
China makes use of any measures in order to preserve the economic upward movement and
ensure the social stability
The Chinese history with long periods of war and the Japanese occupation are still in the
peoplersquos minds which reason the thankfulness for the stability that the CPC has brought the
Chinese in the last decades Hence stability is Chinarsquos highest valued ldquocommodityrdquo and has
had a great influence on the development of Chinese capitalism and thereby also explains
the capitalist environment today For instance the fact that China has pegged their currency
the Yuan to the American dollar and are not willing to let it float which would adjust its value
can be explained by the importance the CPC see in keeping up the economic stability In his
2 httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
3 httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
9 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
report for the American Congress the American economist Wayne M Morrison mentions
ldquoChina continues to ldquomanipulaterdquo its currency in order to give its exporters an unfair trade
advantagerdquo4 An adjustment of their currency would disable the Chinese from keeping their
exports at the current level The increasing exports have earned China the title of the worldrsquos
largest exporter5 and are essential for their economic growth Decreasing exports would
affect the growth rate which then would threaten the countryrsquos stability This shows how the
fear of instability impacts the Chinese decision-making and thereby the present capitalist
environment
Furthermore the influence the growing regional disparity has on the governmentsrsquo decision-
making are another evidence that proves the valuation of stability ldquoBetween 1990 and 2005
Chinarsquos Gini coefficient rose from 0257 to 0447rdquo6 seriously endangering the social stability
in China However as ldquothe countryrsquos phenomenal growth and increasing global heft are
based on a steady [hellip] transition to capitalismrdquo7 and a slowdown or even stagnation of the
countryrsquos growth rate would mean an even greater threat for the countryrsquos stability ldquothe
Communist Party was not willing to slow down growth to address inequality or to leave the
balance purely to market forcesrdquo8 This shows again the huge interest the CPC and the
Peoplersquos Republic of China has in the countryrsquos stability and how it influences important
political decision-making The current growth rate is to a great extend caused by the
capitalist reforms and the slow liberalisation of the Chinese economy This process of
transition will stop at some point though The Chinese are aware that they find themselves in
times of transition and the current growth rate will not last forever which is why Chinarsquos
president promised at the National Peoplersquos Congress (NPC) to ldquofocus more on sustainable
development than rapid economic growthrdquo9
Although the Communist Party China builds up a Chinese capitalism upon a communist
system and embeds many capitalist characteristics in it the state still intervenes a lot to
regulate and control the market The CPC is extremely focussed on keeping the role of the
directive actor They give the pace of moving from a plan economy towards a market-based
economy and the only liberalise the economy to the degree they think is best The state- 4 httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
5 httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-
1864052html 23092011 6 httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
7 httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
8httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Chara
cteristicspdf p14 20092011 9 httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
10 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
owned enterprises that emerged under Maorsquos communist regime and that were characterized
as inefficient over-staffed and not profit-driven have become more efficient less indebted
and through implementation of managers much more profit-driven Nevertheless just as
back at Maorsquos times the CPC uses them as state tools to keep the economy on track
Despite the fact that China has still a lot of government intervention they achieved to enter
the WTO in 200110The entry in the WTO was a push towards more liberalization With the
entry in the WTO China clearly signalised their global orientation and adapting to
international agreements signalised the increasingly important role China is going to play in
the global economy Joining the WTO and adapting to the international rules of exchange
China is facing the global competition now much more than before and the CPC has had to
engage privatization of the SOEs to increase their competitiveness so that the Chinese
economy has been able to maintain their extraordinary growth rate
The present Chinese capitalist environment is very difficult to place on the McCrawrsquos scale of
government intervention On the one hand China is still a communist one-party state
governed by a party which intervenes in the economy to regulate and control the market
According to these facts thorough state management guides China and the state has the
power of decision-making for the whole economy which would mean the Chinese capitalism
had to be placed on the scale at degree 4 However on the other hand the CPC has
dropped most of their communist ideals and keeps transmitting the country by various
reforms into a market-based capitalism Presently the Chinese capitalism fulfils most of the
criteria that characterize capitalism such as labour as a commodity private property a
financial system and a currency The government promotes privatization and makes itself
dependant of international laws which is clear evidence for a decrease in government
intervention The transition towards a common market for example through a reform in the
banking sector which is likely to occur soon keeps moving the Chinese economy towards
capitalism with a systematic state guidance of private decision-making McCrawrsquos degree
number 3 Nevertheless the degree of liberalization is still under complete control of the
CPC and the economy is only as free as the party intends it to be Theoretically the
Communist Party China could rapidly decrease the degree to which the economy is
liberalized change laws and abolish the law that allows for example the property rights
which ensure a capitalist economy This is of course not very likely to happen but it is
important to point out that the whole Chinese capitalist system originates from the
governmentrsquos reforms and guidance Although these reforms have been pushed through and
the Chinese capitalism is more and more liberalized and taken towards a free market-based
10
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
Lenovo 26092011
11 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
economy political freedom is still not given and probably will not be in the close future which
is why China is currently placed on the McCrawrsquos scale of government intervention between
degree 4 and 3 Due to decreasing government intervention it is moving towards degree 3
though Without political freedom which would guarantee economic freedom property rights
and allow competition of law the Chinese capitalism cannot move any further than degree 3
on McCrawrsquos scale
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative
reponses
Introduction
There are many reasons why Lenovo has become one of the most dominant market leaders
in China as well as in the rest of the world One of the most important events in the Lenovorsquos
corporate history was the acquisition of the IBM personal Computing Division in 2005 which
enabled the company to become a competitive computer manufacture both domestically and
internationally Furthermore throughout Lenovorsquos history the state has been a major
stockholder in the company ndash and like other Chinese State supported enterprises ndash the
Chinese government has supported and protected Lenovo by indirect subsidiaries and
policies which made Lenovo capable of maintaining its dominance When analyzing how
Lenovo managed to develop its organization in a nation that has been marked by serious
economic and politic instability it is important to understand the entrepreneurial spirit that
has driven the company throughout its history Innovation and technological development
have been the core factors that contributed to the strong positioning of the Lenovo Group
Limited as being one of the pioneers in the global computer industry These different
strategic initiatives are somehow all exemplifies for different responses that Lenovo has
made in order survive the demanding IT-industry which is strongly affected by both the
globalization and liberalization of the Chinese market along with the very special type of
capitalism that characterizes the Chinese economy
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer
To start with Lenovo was owned by Legend Holdings Limited until 1994 when it was listed
on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong11 In March 2011 57 of Lenovo was owned by
public shareholders 42 by Legend Holdings Ltd and 1 by the directors12 The
11
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_cid=72 2009-11 12
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
Lenovo 26092011
12 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companyrsquos previous state ownership has implicitly contributed to Lenovorsquos success given the
advantage Lenovo has gained in the domestic market due to the one party-system that has
favoured strong domestic enterprises Although the Chinese government targeted the PC
industry as a national priority in the 1980rsquos Lenovo was not among those companies
selected by the government to be nurtured as the foundation of Chinarsquos future PC industry
Therefore Lenovo was not a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) in its true sense given that it
did not directly receive state support eg Lenovo did not receive a licence to produce PCs
until 199113 Despite the fact that Lenovo was not considered an ldquoordinaryrdquo SOE it still relied
on its parentrsquos the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) labs for the Research and
Development which it could use free of charge Lenovorsquos first production was developed at
ICT whom also facilitated Lenovorsquos first production experience by loaning their personnel
during the process ICT with its links to the government through the CAS supported Lenovo
in its early survival and thus the Chinese state played a significant role in the companyrsquos
early maintenance and growth
As Lenovo made its first Personal Computer under its own brand name in 1991 the
company suddenly became more important in the eyes of the government In 1994 the
company was celebrating its one millionth PC built14 In the same year it was revealed that
domestic computer companies such as Lenovo were going to be protected under a new
policy which was announced by the Chinese ministry of Electronics Lenovo was included in
Chinas ninth Five Year Plan - from 1996 to 2000 - as a key entity to be supported by
government policies15 During the ninth Five Year Plan China invested over $12 billion in the
909 Project which is the most expensive government effort for developing an advanced
semiconductor industry in China16 As a result of the government intervention Lenovo also
received an amount of the subsidy and eventually became the Chinese market leader in
1997 even surpassing IBM The latter was one of the main reasons for IBM to sell its PC
division to Lenovo The fact that Lenovo was able to grow with the indirect support of the
Chinese government reflects the special kind of capitalism that exist in the Chinese
economy Lenovo was operating on a free global market and at the same time enjoying the
beneficial protectionism and subsidies provided by the communist government The
13
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 2109-11 14
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 21092011
16 httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p169033-
19php page 19 21092011
Lenovo 26092011
13 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
legislation also provided the legal framework that would eventually make the acquisition of
IBM possible The law stated that foreign companies who wanted access to China could
only do so by cooperating with a Chinese company This rule was implemented so ensure
that Chinese companies gained eg know-how on technology
Lenovorsquos success started gradually in 1987 when the company expanded its activities to
distribution first for AST (the leading foreign brand in China at that time) and later adding
Hewlett-Packard Toshiba and IBM to its list17 Chuanzh the former CEO even went to the
extent of saying that ldquoOur earliest and best teacher was Hewlett-Packerrdquo18 What Chuanzh
wanted to empathize was that multinational companies such as HP were not only a source of
revenue for Lenovo but also a source of learning By distributing foreign-made PCs Lenovo
learned how to organize sales channels and merchandise PCs on a competitive market
Thus Lenovo began to comprehend its Chinese customers and the PC purchasing habits
making this a key for its dominance in the market for the upcoming years
The demand for computer technology became pervasive during the Third Industrial
Revolution which naturally benefited all computer manufactures around the world A lot of
Chinese industries had not yet reached the industrialization level of the western world
however the IT-industry is an exception The Chinese IT-industry plays a great part in the
Third Industrial Revolution where the immense increase in volume of international trade
investment and finance frequently has been centred in China In addition one could
therefore argue that Lenovo came on the right time with its first PC in 1991 in the exact same
period of history where demand for computer technology increased explaining its enormous
success both in the domestic and international market Lenovo already had a wide network
of distributors at that time and gained great insight in the Chinese consumption pattern
which gave them a huge advantage compared to their strongest competitors Thus it is
necessary to stress the importance of the Third Industrial Revolution as it created a market
Lenovo knew how to profit from by using its competitive advantages
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive
The various Schumpeterian responses that have been made in Lenovorsquos corporate history
enable us to explain how Lenovo became one of the market leaders in the IT-industry The
17
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 19092011 18
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
3 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Contents
Abstract 2
Introduction 4
Background 5
Chinarsquos history in short and a clear definition of Chinese capitalism 5
Communism 5
Xiaoping 5
Theory 6
McCrawrsquos Scale 6
Schumpeter ndash the entreprenuer 7
The present nature of Chinese capitalism 7
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative reponses 11
Introduction 11
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer 11
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive 13
Chinese movement through various degrees 18
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo 18
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism 21
Conclusion 22
Schumpeterian 23
China and Lenovo 24
Literature List 25
Web articles 25
Lenovo 26092011
4 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Introduction
The financial crisis has hit the Western capitalist economies very hard and most of these find
themselves now in economic depressions However this tremendous crisis has not been
able to shock the Chinese economy which has still an extremely high annual growth rate
China continues to grow already to the second largest economy of the world in 2010 after
USA
What makes China especially interesting is the fact that the country has been able to
combine their communistic political conviction and change the economy from a closed plan
economy into an economy with more and more capitalistic characteristics What is more the
communistic roots give Chinese capitalism a number of benefits compared to old capitalistic
countries For example the fact that Chinese managements are able to make decision faster
as they are less tied to the shareholders However the Chinese rise is not over On average
the income level in China is increasing but this hides an increasing inequality between the
rural and the urban areas China has over four times Americarsquos population it only has to
produce a quarter of Americarsquos output per head to exceed Americarsquos total output and it has
been estimated that by 2016 the Chinese economy will surpass the US economy and
thereby become the biggest economy in the world China is an emerging economy and is
therefore an interesting country that is likely to change the world order in the future At least
a lot of economists talks about the economic power moving to the east
It is interesting to look at the Chinese variation of capitalism because it is so contrary to the
Western capitalism A common Western belief is that a free market political freedom and
limited power of the state are the best combination to secure growth However the Chinese
variation of capitalism has shown that the Western belief is not necessarily the only answer
It is also interesting to see how Chinese companies act in the Chinese variation of capitalism
where many of the worldrsquos biggest multinational enterprises (MNEs) have now emerged
This paper shows what characterizes the present nature of the Chinese capitalism and
illustrates where on a McCrawrsquos scale between ldquolaissez-fairerdquo with minimal state intervention
and ldquothorough state management and decision-making for the whole economyrdquo the current
Chinese economy is placed It also examines the fact that China has moved through various
degrees throughout the history Later on this paper turns its focus to Lenovo and describes
how Lenovo became a market leader by 1997 only six years after its first computer was
manufactured In this context it is interesting to look at the possible creative and adaptive
responses according to Joseph Schumpeter made by Lenovo Furthermore this paper
looks at how these ldquoSchumpeterian decisionsrdquo secured Lenovorsquos growth and survival in an
Lenovo 26092011
5 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
ever changing and extremely competitive industry In the end the paper combines the
development of Lenovo and reflects it to the development of the Chinese capitalism
Background
Chinarsquos history in short and a clear definition of Chinese capitalism
Communism
After establishing the Peoplersquos Republic of China in 1949 Mao Zedong managed to organise
the administration and rebuild the economy that had suffered from decades of war in just five
years The new state nationalised the countryrsquos banking system and brought all currency and
credit under centralised control It regulated prices and boosted government revenues by
collecting agricultural taxes By the mid-1950s the communists had rebuilt and expanded the
countryrsquos railroad and highway systems boosted agricultural and industrial production to
their pre-war levels and brought Chinarsquos industry and commerce under direct state control
After the land reform agricultural collectives were reorganized into enormous communes
where wages were calculated according to the principle bdquoto each according to his needsrdquo and
side-line production was banned Procurement prices were too low to cover the production
costs and ceilings were set on the amount of grain that producers could keep for
consumption Over-ambiguous targets and thus falsified production figures let the officials
live in an unreal world of production increases The Great Leap Forward had become a giant
step backwards
By the 1960 the situation had come so serious that Mao had to step side-lines By then
large areas of China were in famine people were exhausted and GDP had declined about
one-third For the next several years agricultural and industrial production returned to normal
levels and labour productivity began to rise
Mao reasserted his power in 1966 and started to bdquoput China back on trackldquo Universities and
schools were closed intellectuals were harassed and any sign of capitalism was enough to
condemn someone as a foe of the Communist Party By 1969 the country was back in
anarchy and the economy was again going downwards
Xiaoping
Chinarsquos next leader Deng Xiaoping who replaced Mao after his death in 1976 started
quickly reforming the country Communes were broken up and replaced with leasing
systems state procurement prices were raised and the Communist Party China (CPC) left
many prices of agricultural goods to be dictated by the market Farmers were allowed to
Lenovo 26092011
6 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
produce on their own and sell the surplus on the newly freed markets to retain any profits
they might earn which gave them an incentive to produce more efficiently so by the end of
the decade the production had grown by roughly 30 per cent Deng also attacked Chinarsquos
food shortages by encouraging families to adopt the one-child policy
Along with the changes in the countryside China started to open up to the rest of the world
Four special economic zones were created which attracted foreign investors with tax
incentives foreign exchange provisions and a lack of regulation By the late 1980s the
government began to open the doors even more aggressively by giving foreign investors
more control of factories long-term land leases and permitting dual exchange rate In 1984
the state applied the dual-price system also to many other industrial products By 1988 both
industrial and agricultural production had reached to new heights with the first one
increasing a fifth annually although state budget continued to support loss-making SOEs In
1989 the government proved the ability to keep its economy under control with wide-scale
retrenchment which saved the country from inflationary spiral Due to the reforms foreign
direct investment to China rose to $112 billion by 1992 two and a half fold increase
compared to the previous year Along the way however the ldquorectificationrdquo program
unleashed a violent series of political events by which the Chinese Communist Party
signalled that despite the liberalising reforms it had no intention of letting loose the reins of
control
With these reforms Chinese communism was in gradual transformation to Chinese
capitalism
Theory
In this section of the paper we describe the theories which create the foundation of the
paper The paper mainly consists of two important theories McCrawrsquos scale and
Schumpeterrsquos entreprenuer theory The two theories are briefly described in the following
McCrawrsquos Scale
McCrawrsquos scale is a scale of four degrees (McCraw 1997)
1 Laissez faire with minimal state intervention
2 frequent uncoordinated state intervention in a mostly free market
3 systematic state guidance of private decision-making
4 through state management and decision-making for the whole economy
Lenovo 26092011
7 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
This scale can be used in order to analyze a countryrsquos nature of capitalism at a certain time
The fourth degree is a plan economy where supply and demand are not controlling
production Instead the production is guided by the state This degree is for instance where
a communist state would be placed At the other end of the scale is the ldquolaissez-fairerdquo degree
where the state intervention is at its minimal On this degree it is supply and demand that
control the market In between we have ldquofrequent but uncoordinated intervention in a mostly
free marketrdquo This is the degree most capitalist countries have Furthermore there is the
ldquosystematic state guidancerdquo left In this degree the state plays a big role but supply and
demand still control many markets State ownership is normal in this degree In this paper we
have used this scale in order to analyze the present nature of Chinese capitalism
Schumpeter ndash the entreprenuer
Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950) presented a theory which suggested that the entreprenuer
plays a big role in the economic development (Joseph Schumpeter 1947) The entreprenuer
creates both adaptive responses and creative responses The creative reponses causes
bdquocreative destructionldquo as it destroys the way certain things used to be done until then in a
certain industry The creative response can not be predicted and is something that creates
new pratices outside the existing practices of the industry
Schumpeter acknowledges the inventer innovator etc however Schumpeter favours the
entreprenuer who actually gets things done Hence Schumpeter was much more interested
in the one who commercialized a product not in the one who invented it An example is the
steam engine which was invented in the 16th century but not commercialized until the early
18th century Until an idea is commercialized it does not matter in an economic perspective
It is worth mentioning that according to Schumpeter it is essential that the entreprenuer has
motivations for doing what heshe does The ability to retain profits is very important in this
context
The present nature of Chinese capitalism
Looking at the present nature of capitalism China must be seen as a state in transition and
the current situation is difficult to define After the harsh reign of Mao Zedong (1949-1976)
the country started its transition in 1978 when Deng implemented the first reforms ldquoand [it]
received a decisive push from 1992 onwardsrdquo1 with the reforms of the 1990s
1 httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
8 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
The implementation of capitalism by a communist party into a communist system is
compulsorily a difficult process The CPC has often been stuck between maintaining
communist values and keeping up the implementation of capitalism This contradiction might
get clearer by a concrete example The Chinese president said in the National Peoplersquos
Congress that the priorities now are promoting equality in education opportunities adopting
progressive employment policies narrowing income gaps and building social security
networks9 Promoting capitalist reforms and keeping up the extraordinary growth brings
does not allow these priorities though and increasing inequality between the benefitting
developed urban areas and the underprivileged rural regions is one of the consequences this
growth has Urging further reforms and heading the country towards being more capitalistic
is clear evidence that ldquoChinarsquos communists have long since given up on true communismrdquo2
The reforms have promoted privatization Foreign Direct Investment private property and
many more capitalist characteristics most of these are only advantageous for the already
developed emerging cities along the Chinese coast To give an example of an achievement
reached by the reforms the Chinese private sector now accounts for approximately 70 of
gross domestic product3 today However the country is only midway through the process
and there are more reforms likely to be made For instance ldquothe capital markets and
securities markets still are underdeveloped because 70 of shares of almost all listed
companies are not tradablerdquo3 The fact that ldquoan experimental program was announced to
make the non-tradable shares tradablerdquo3 illustrates that the CPC also intends to implement
further liberal capitalist characteristics into the Chinese type of capitalism besides trying to
decrease inequality which underlines the contradiction Participating in the global trade made
China join the WTO in 2001 which has enforced China to become more liberal and
capitalistic in terms of their tariffs quotas and licensing requirements The Communist Party
China makes use of any measures in order to preserve the economic upward movement and
ensure the social stability
The Chinese history with long periods of war and the Japanese occupation are still in the
peoplersquos minds which reason the thankfulness for the stability that the CPC has brought the
Chinese in the last decades Hence stability is Chinarsquos highest valued ldquocommodityrdquo and has
had a great influence on the development of Chinese capitalism and thereby also explains
the capitalist environment today For instance the fact that China has pegged their currency
the Yuan to the American dollar and are not willing to let it float which would adjust its value
can be explained by the importance the CPC see in keeping up the economic stability In his
2 httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
3 httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
9 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
report for the American Congress the American economist Wayne M Morrison mentions
ldquoChina continues to ldquomanipulaterdquo its currency in order to give its exporters an unfair trade
advantagerdquo4 An adjustment of their currency would disable the Chinese from keeping their
exports at the current level The increasing exports have earned China the title of the worldrsquos
largest exporter5 and are essential for their economic growth Decreasing exports would
affect the growth rate which then would threaten the countryrsquos stability This shows how the
fear of instability impacts the Chinese decision-making and thereby the present capitalist
environment
Furthermore the influence the growing regional disparity has on the governmentsrsquo decision-
making are another evidence that proves the valuation of stability ldquoBetween 1990 and 2005
Chinarsquos Gini coefficient rose from 0257 to 0447rdquo6 seriously endangering the social stability
in China However as ldquothe countryrsquos phenomenal growth and increasing global heft are
based on a steady [hellip] transition to capitalismrdquo7 and a slowdown or even stagnation of the
countryrsquos growth rate would mean an even greater threat for the countryrsquos stability ldquothe
Communist Party was not willing to slow down growth to address inequality or to leave the
balance purely to market forcesrdquo8 This shows again the huge interest the CPC and the
Peoplersquos Republic of China has in the countryrsquos stability and how it influences important
political decision-making The current growth rate is to a great extend caused by the
capitalist reforms and the slow liberalisation of the Chinese economy This process of
transition will stop at some point though The Chinese are aware that they find themselves in
times of transition and the current growth rate will not last forever which is why Chinarsquos
president promised at the National Peoplersquos Congress (NPC) to ldquofocus more on sustainable
development than rapid economic growthrdquo9
Although the Communist Party China builds up a Chinese capitalism upon a communist
system and embeds many capitalist characteristics in it the state still intervenes a lot to
regulate and control the market The CPC is extremely focussed on keeping the role of the
directive actor They give the pace of moving from a plan economy towards a market-based
economy and the only liberalise the economy to the degree they think is best The state- 4 httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
5 httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-
1864052html 23092011 6 httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
7 httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
8httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Chara
cteristicspdf p14 20092011 9 httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
10 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
owned enterprises that emerged under Maorsquos communist regime and that were characterized
as inefficient over-staffed and not profit-driven have become more efficient less indebted
and through implementation of managers much more profit-driven Nevertheless just as
back at Maorsquos times the CPC uses them as state tools to keep the economy on track
Despite the fact that China has still a lot of government intervention they achieved to enter
the WTO in 200110The entry in the WTO was a push towards more liberalization With the
entry in the WTO China clearly signalised their global orientation and adapting to
international agreements signalised the increasingly important role China is going to play in
the global economy Joining the WTO and adapting to the international rules of exchange
China is facing the global competition now much more than before and the CPC has had to
engage privatization of the SOEs to increase their competitiveness so that the Chinese
economy has been able to maintain their extraordinary growth rate
The present Chinese capitalist environment is very difficult to place on the McCrawrsquos scale of
government intervention On the one hand China is still a communist one-party state
governed by a party which intervenes in the economy to regulate and control the market
According to these facts thorough state management guides China and the state has the
power of decision-making for the whole economy which would mean the Chinese capitalism
had to be placed on the scale at degree 4 However on the other hand the CPC has
dropped most of their communist ideals and keeps transmitting the country by various
reforms into a market-based capitalism Presently the Chinese capitalism fulfils most of the
criteria that characterize capitalism such as labour as a commodity private property a
financial system and a currency The government promotes privatization and makes itself
dependant of international laws which is clear evidence for a decrease in government
intervention The transition towards a common market for example through a reform in the
banking sector which is likely to occur soon keeps moving the Chinese economy towards
capitalism with a systematic state guidance of private decision-making McCrawrsquos degree
number 3 Nevertheless the degree of liberalization is still under complete control of the
CPC and the economy is only as free as the party intends it to be Theoretically the
Communist Party China could rapidly decrease the degree to which the economy is
liberalized change laws and abolish the law that allows for example the property rights
which ensure a capitalist economy This is of course not very likely to happen but it is
important to point out that the whole Chinese capitalist system originates from the
governmentrsquos reforms and guidance Although these reforms have been pushed through and
the Chinese capitalism is more and more liberalized and taken towards a free market-based
10
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
Lenovo 26092011
11 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
economy political freedom is still not given and probably will not be in the close future which
is why China is currently placed on the McCrawrsquos scale of government intervention between
degree 4 and 3 Due to decreasing government intervention it is moving towards degree 3
though Without political freedom which would guarantee economic freedom property rights
and allow competition of law the Chinese capitalism cannot move any further than degree 3
on McCrawrsquos scale
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative
reponses
Introduction
There are many reasons why Lenovo has become one of the most dominant market leaders
in China as well as in the rest of the world One of the most important events in the Lenovorsquos
corporate history was the acquisition of the IBM personal Computing Division in 2005 which
enabled the company to become a competitive computer manufacture both domestically and
internationally Furthermore throughout Lenovorsquos history the state has been a major
stockholder in the company ndash and like other Chinese State supported enterprises ndash the
Chinese government has supported and protected Lenovo by indirect subsidiaries and
policies which made Lenovo capable of maintaining its dominance When analyzing how
Lenovo managed to develop its organization in a nation that has been marked by serious
economic and politic instability it is important to understand the entrepreneurial spirit that
has driven the company throughout its history Innovation and technological development
have been the core factors that contributed to the strong positioning of the Lenovo Group
Limited as being one of the pioneers in the global computer industry These different
strategic initiatives are somehow all exemplifies for different responses that Lenovo has
made in order survive the demanding IT-industry which is strongly affected by both the
globalization and liberalization of the Chinese market along with the very special type of
capitalism that characterizes the Chinese economy
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer
To start with Lenovo was owned by Legend Holdings Limited until 1994 when it was listed
on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong11 In March 2011 57 of Lenovo was owned by
public shareholders 42 by Legend Holdings Ltd and 1 by the directors12 The
11
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_cid=72 2009-11 12
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
Lenovo 26092011
12 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companyrsquos previous state ownership has implicitly contributed to Lenovorsquos success given the
advantage Lenovo has gained in the domestic market due to the one party-system that has
favoured strong domestic enterprises Although the Chinese government targeted the PC
industry as a national priority in the 1980rsquos Lenovo was not among those companies
selected by the government to be nurtured as the foundation of Chinarsquos future PC industry
Therefore Lenovo was not a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) in its true sense given that it
did not directly receive state support eg Lenovo did not receive a licence to produce PCs
until 199113 Despite the fact that Lenovo was not considered an ldquoordinaryrdquo SOE it still relied
on its parentrsquos the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) labs for the Research and
Development which it could use free of charge Lenovorsquos first production was developed at
ICT whom also facilitated Lenovorsquos first production experience by loaning their personnel
during the process ICT with its links to the government through the CAS supported Lenovo
in its early survival and thus the Chinese state played a significant role in the companyrsquos
early maintenance and growth
As Lenovo made its first Personal Computer under its own brand name in 1991 the
company suddenly became more important in the eyes of the government In 1994 the
company was celebrating its one millionth PC built14 In the same year it was revealed that
domestic computer companies such as Lenovo were going to be protected under a new
policy which was announced by the Chinese ministry of Electronics Lenovo was included in
Chinas ninth Five Year Plan - from 1996 to 2000 - as a key entity to be supported by
government policies15 During the ninth Five Year Plan China invested over $12 billion in the
909 Project which is the most expensive government effort for developing an advanced
semiconductor industry in China16 As a result of the government intervention Lenovo also
received an amount of the subsidy and eventually became the Chinese market leader in
1997 even surpassing IBM The latter was one of the main reasons for IBM to sell its PC
division to Lenovo The fact that Lenovo was able to grow with the indirect support of the
Chinese government reflects the special kind of capitalism that exist in the Chinese
economy Lenovo was operating on a free global market and at the same time enjoying the
beneficial protectionism and subsidies provided by the communist government The
13
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 2109-11 14
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 21092011
16 httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p169033-
19php page 19 21092011
Lenovo 26092011
13 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
legislation also provided the legal framework that would eventually make the acquisition of
IBM possible The law stated that foreign companies who wanted access to China could
only do so by cooperating with a Chinese company This rule was implemented so ensure
that Chinese companies gained eg know-how on technology
Lenovorsquos success started gradually in 1987 when the company expanded its activities to
distribution first for AST (the leading foreign brand in China at that time) and later adding
Hewlett-Packard Toshiba and IBM to its list17 Chuanzh the former CEO even went to the
extent of saying that ldquoOur earliest and best teacher was Hewlett-Packerrdquo18 What Chuanzh
wanted to empathize was that multinational companies such as HP were not only a source of
revenue for Lenovo but also a source of learning By distributing foreign-made PCs Lenovo
learned how to organize sales channels and merchandise PCs on a competitive market
Thus Lenovo began to comprehend its Chinese customers and the PC purchasing habits
making this a key for its dominance in the market for the upcoming years
The demand for computer technology became pervasive during the Third Industrial
Revolution which naturally benefited all computer manufactures around the world A lot of
Chinese industries had not yet reached the industrialization level of the western world
however the IT-industry is an exception The Chinese IT-industry plays a great part in the
Third Industrial Revolution where the immense increase in volume of international trade
investment and finance frequently has been centred in China In addition one could
therefore argue that Lenovo came on the right time with its first PC in 1991 in the exact same
period of history where demand for computer technology increased explaining its enormous
success both in the domestic and international market Lenovo already had a wide network
of distributors at that time and gained great insight in the Chinese consumption pattern
which gave them a huge advantage compared to their strongest competitors Thus it is
necessary to stress the importance of the Third Industrial Revolution as it created a market
Lenovo knew how to profit from by using its competitive advantages
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive
The various Schumpeterian responses that have been made in Lenovorsquos corporate history
enable us to explain how Lenovo became one of the market leaders in the IT-industry The
17
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 19092011 18
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
4 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Introduction
The financial crisis has hit the Western capitalist economies very hard and most of these find
themselves now in economic depressions However this tremendous crisis has not been
able to shock the Chinese economy which has still an extremely high annual growth rate
China continues to grow already to the second largest economy of the world in 2010 after
USA
What makes China especially interesting is the fact that the country has been able to
combine their communistic political conviction and change the economy from a closed plan
economy into an economy with more and more capitalistic characteristics What is more the
communistic roots give Chinese capitalism a number of benefits compared to old capitalistic
countries For example the fact that Chinese managements are able to make decision faster
as they are less tied to the shareholders However the Chinese rise is not over On average
the income level in China is increasing but this hides an increasing inequality between the
rural and the urban areas China has over four times Americarsquos population it only has to
produce a quarter of Americarsquos output per head to exceed Americarsquos total output and it has
been estimated that by 2016 the Chinese economy will surpass the US economy and
thereby become the biggest economy in the world China is an emerging economy and is
therefore an interesting country that is likely to change the world order in the future At least
a lot of economists talks about the economic power moving to the east
It is interesting to look at the Chinese variation of capitalism because it is so contrary to the
Western capitalism A common Western belief is that a free market political freedom and
limited power of the state are the best combination to secure growth However the Chinese
variation of capitalism has shown that the Western belief is not necessarily the only answer
It is also interesting to see how Chinese companies act in the Chinese variation of capitalism
where many of the worldrsquos biggest multinational enterprises (MNEs) have now emerged
This paper shows what characterizes the present nature of the Chinese capitalism and
illustrates where on a McCrawrsquos scale between ldquolaissez-fairerdquo with minimal state intervention
and ldquothorough state management and decision-making for the whole economyrdquo the current
Chinese economy is placed It also examines the fact that China has moved through various
degrees throughout the history Later on this paper turns its focus to Lenovo and describes
how Lenovo became a market leader by 1997 only six years after its first computer was
manufactured In this context it is interesting to look at the possible creative and adaptive
responses according to Joseph Schumpeter made by Lenovo Furthermore this paper
looks at how these ldquoSchumpeterian decisionsrdquo secured Lenovorsquos growth and survival in an
Lenovo 26092011
5 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
ever changing and extremely competitive industry In the end the paper combines the
development of Lenovo and reflects it to the development of the Chinese capitalism
Background
Chinarsquos history in short and a clear definition of Chinese capitalism
Communism
After establishing the Peoplersquos Republic of China in 1949 Mao Zedong managed to organise
the administration and rebuild the economy that had suffered from decades of war in just five
years The new state nationalised the countryrsquos banking system and brought all currency and
credit under centralised control It regulated prices and boosted government revenues by
collecting agricultural taxes By the mid-1950s the communists had rebuilt and expanded the
countryrsquos railroad and highway systems boosted agricultural and industrial production to
their pre-war levels and brought Chinarsquos industry and commerce under direct state control
After the land reform agricultural collectives were reorganized into enormous communes
where wages were calculated according to the principle bdquoto each according to his needsrdquo and
side-line production was banned Procurement prices were too low to cover the production
costs and ceilings were set on the amount of grain that producers could keep for
consumption Over-ambiguous targets and thus falsified production figures let the officials
live in an unreal world of production increases The Great Leap Forward had become a giant
step backwards
By the 1960 the situation had come so serious that Mao had to step side-lines By then
large areas of China were in famine people were exhausted and GDP had declined about
one-third For the next several years agricultural and industrial production returned to normal
levels and labour productivity began to rise
Mao reasserted his power in 1966 and started to bdquoput China back on trackldquo Universities and
schools were closed intellectuals were harassed and any sign of capitalism was enough to
condemn someone as a foe of the Communist Party By 1969 the country was back in
anarchy and the economy was again going downwards
Xiaoping
Chinarsquos next leader Deng Xiaoping who replaced Mao after his death in 1976 started
quickly reforming the country Communes were broken up and replaced with leasing
systems state procurement prices were raised and the Communist Party China (CPC) left
many prices of agricultural goods to be dictated by the market Farmers were allowed to
Lenovo 26092011
6 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
produce on their own and sell the surplus on the newly freed markets to retain any profits
they might earn which gave them an incentive to produce more efficiently so by the end of
the decade the production had grown by roughly 30 per cent Deng also attacked Chinarsquos
food shortages by encouraging families to adopt the one-child policy
Along with the changes in the countryside China started to open up to the rest of the world
Four special economic zones were created which attracted foreign investors with tax
incentives foreign exchange provisions and a lack of regulation By the late 1980s the
government began to open the doors even more aggressively by giving foreign investors
more control of factories long-term land leases and permitting dual exchange rate In 1984
the state applied the dual-price system also to many other industrial products By 1988 both
industrial and agricultural production had reached to new heights with the first one
increasing a fifth annually although state budget continued to support loss-making SOEs In
1989 the government proved the ability to keep its economy under control with wide-scale
retrenchment which saved the country from inflationary spiral Due to the reforms foreign
direct investment to China rose to $112 billion by 1992 two and a half fold increase
compared to the previous year Along the way however the ldquorectificationrdquo program
unleashed a violent series of political events by which the Chinese Communist Party
signalled that despite the liberalising reforms it had no intention of letting loose the reins of
control
With these reforms Chinese communism was in gradual transformation to Chinese
capitalism
Theory
In this section of the paper we describe the theories which create the foundation of the
paper The paper mainly consists of two important theories McCrawrsquos scale and
Schumpeterrsquos entreprenuer theory The two theories are briefly described in the following
McCrawrsquos Scale
McCrawrsquos scale is a scale of four degrees (McCraw 1997)
1 Laissez faire with minimal state intervention
2 frequent uncoordinated state intervention in a mostly free market
3 systematic state guidance of private decision-making
4 through state management and decision-making for the whole economy
Lenovo 26092011
7 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
This scale can be used in order to analyze a countryrsquos nature of capitalism at a certain time
The fourth degree is a plan economy where supply and demand are not controlling
production Instead the production is guided by the state This degree is for instance where
a communist state would be placed At the other end of the scale is the ldquolaissez-fairerdquo degree
where the state intervention is at its minimal On this degree it is supply and demand that
control the market In between we have ldquofrequent but uncoordinated intervention in a mostly
free marketrdquo This is the degree most capitalist countries have Furthermore there is the
ldquosystematic state guidancerdquo left In this degree the state plays a big role but supply and
demand still control many markets State ownership is normal in this degree In this paper we
have used this scale in order to analyze the present nature of Chinese capitalism
Schumpeter ndash the entreprenuer
Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950) presented a theory which suggested that the entreprenuer
plays a big role in the economic development (Joseph Schumpeter 1947) The entreprenuer
creates both adaptive responses and creative responses The creative reponses causes
bdquocreative destructionldquo as it destroys the way certain things used to be done until then in a
certain industry The creative response can not be predicted and is something that creates
new pratices outside the existing practices of the industry
Schumpeter acknowledges the inventer innovator etc however Schumpeter favours the
entreprenuer who actually gets things done Hence Schumpeter was much more interested
in the one who commercialized a product not in the one who invented it An example is the
steam engine which was invented in the 16th century but not commercialized until the early
18th century Until an idea is commercialized it does not matter in an economic perspective
It is worth mentioning that according to Schumpeter it is essential that the entreprenuer has
motivations for doing what heshe does The ability to retain profits is very important in this
context
The present nature of Chinese capitalism
Looking at the present nature of capitalism China must be seen as a state in transition and
the current situation is difficult to define After the harsh reign of Mao Zedong (1949-1976)
the country started its transition in 1978 when Deng implemented the first reforms ldquoand [it]
received a decisive push from 1992 onwardsrdquo1 with the reforms of the 1990s
1 httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
8 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
The implementation of capitalism by a communist party into a communist system is
compulsorily a difficult process The CPC has often been stuck between maintaining
communist values and keeping up the implementation of capitalism This contradiction might
get clearer by a concrete example The Chinese president said in the National Peoplersquos
Congress that the priorities now are promoting equality in education opportunities adopting
progressive employment policies narrowing income gaps and building social security
networks9 Promoting capitalist reforms and keeping up the extraordinary growth brings
does not allow these priorities though and increasing inequality between the benefitting
developed urban areas and the underprivileged rural regions is one of the consequences this
growth has Urging further reforms and heading the country towards being more capitalistic
is clear evidence that ldquoChinarsquos communists have long since given up on true communismrdquo2
The reforms have promoted privatization Foreign Direct Investment private property and
many more capitalist characteristics most of these are only advantageous for the already
developed emerging cities along the Chinese coast To give an example of an achievement
reached by the reforms the Chinese private sector now accounts for approximately 70 of
gross domestic product3 today However the country is only midway through the process
and there are more reforms likely to be made For instance ldquothe capital markets and
securities markets still are underdeveloped because 70 of shares of almost all listed
companies are not tradablerdquo3 The fact that ldquoan experimental program was announced to
make the non-tradable shares tradablerdquo3 illustrates that the CPC also intends to implement
further liberal capitalist characteristics into the Chinese type of capitalism besides trying to
decrease inequality which underlines the contradiction Participating in the global trade made
China join the WTO in 2001 which has enforced China to become more liberal and
capitalistic in terms of their tariffs quotas and licensing requirements The Communist Party
China makes use of any measures in order to preserve the economic upward movement and
ensure the social stability
The Chinese history with long periods of war and the Japanese occupation are still in the
peoplersquos minds which reason the thankfulness for the stability that the CPC has brought the
Chinese in the last decades Hence stability is Chinarsquos highest valued ldquocommodityrdquo and has
had a great influence on the development of Chinese capitalism and thereby also explains
the capitalist environment today For instance the fact that China has pegged their currency
the Yuan to the American dollar and are not willing to let it float which would adjust its value
can be explained by the importance the CPC see in keeping up the economic stability In his
2 httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
3 httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
9 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
report for the American Congress the American economist Wayne M Morrison mentions
ldquoChina continues to ldquomanipulaterdquo its currency in order to give its exporters an unfair trade
advantagerdquo4 An adjustment of their currency would disable the Chinese from keeping their
exports at the current level The increasing exports have earned China the title of the worldrsquos
largest exporter5 and are essential for their economic growth Decreasing exports would
affect the growth rate which then would threaten the countryrsquos stability This shows how the
fear of instability impacts the Chinese decision-making and thereby the present capitalist
environment
Furthermore the influence the growing regional disparity has on the governmentsrsquo decision-
making are another evidence that proves the valuation of stability ldquoBetween 1990 and 2005
Chinarsquos Gini coefficient rose from 0257 to 0447rdquo6 seriously endangering the social stability
in China However as ldquothe countryrsquos phenomenal growth and increasing global heft are
based on a steady [hellip] transition to capitalismrdquo7 and a slowdown or even stagnation of the
countryrsquos growth rate would mean an even greater threat for the countryrsquos stability ldquothe
Communist Party was not willing to slow down growth to address inequality or to leave the
balance purely to market forcesrdquo8 This shows again the huge interest the CPC and the
Peoplersquos Republic of China has in the countryrsquos stability and how it influences important
political decision-making The current growth rate is to a great extend caused by the
capitalist reforms and the slow liberalisation of the Chinese economy This process of
transition will stop at some point though The Chinese are aware that they find themselves in
times of transition and the current growth rate will not last forever which is why Chinarsquos
president promised at the National Peoplersquos Congress (NPC) to ldquofocus more on sustainable
development than rapid economic growthrdquo9
Although the Communist Party China builds up a Chinese capitalism upon a communist
system and embeds many capitalist characteristics in it the state still intervenes a lot to
regulate and control the market The CPC is extremely focussed on keeping the role of the
directive actor They give the pace of moving from a plan economy towards a market-based
economy and the only liberalise the economy to the degree they think is best The state- 4 httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
5 httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-
1864052html 23092011 6 httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
7 httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
8httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Chara
cteristicspdf p14 20092011 9 httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
10 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
owned enterprises that emerged under Maorsquos communist regime and that were characterized
as inefficient over-staffed and not profit-driven have become more efficient less indebted
and through implementation of managers much more profit-driven Nevertheless just as
back at Maorsquos times the CPC uses them as state tools to keep the economy on track
Despite the fact that China has still a lot of government intervention they achieved to enter
the WTO in 200110The entry in the WTO was a push towards more liberalization With the
entry in the WTO China clearly signalised their global orientation and adapting to
international agreements signalised the increasingly important role China is going to play in
the global economy Joining the WTO and adapting to the international rules of exchange
China is facing the global competition now much more than before and the CPC has had to
engage privatization of the SOEs to increase their competitiveness so that the Chinese
economy has been able to maintain their extraordinary growth rate
The present Chinese capitalist environment is very difficult to place on the McCrawrsquos scale of
government intervention On the one hand China is still a communist one-party state
governed by a party which intervenes in the economy to regulate and control the market
According to these facts thorough state management guides China and the state has the
power of decision-making for the whole economy which would mean the Chinese capitalism
had to be placed on the scale at degree 4 However on the other hand the CPC has
dropped most of their communist ideals and keeps transmitting the country by various
reforms into a market-based capitalism Presently the Chinese capitalism fulfils most of the
criteria that characterize capitalism such as labour as a commodity private property a
financial system and a currency The government promotes privatization and makes itself
dependant of international laws which is clear evidence for a decrease in government
intervention The transition towards a common market for example through a reform in the
banking sector which is likely to occur soon keeps moving the Chinese economy towards
capitalism with a systematic state guidance of private decision-making McCrawrsquos degree
number 3 Nevertheless the degree of liberalization is still under complete control of the
CPC and the economy is only as free as the party intends it to be Theoretically the
Communist Party China could rapidly decrease the degree to which the economy is
liberalized change laws and abolish the law that allows for example the property rights
which ensure a capitalist economy This is of course not very likely to happen but it is
important to point out that the whole Chinese capitalist system originates from the
governmentrsquos reforms and guidance Although these reforms have been pushed through and
the Chinese capitalism is more and more liberalized and taken towards a free market-based
10
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
Lenovo 26092011
11 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
economy political freedom is still not given and probably will not be in the close future which
is why China is currently placed on the McCrawrsquos scale of government intervention between
degree 4 and 3 Due to decreasing government intervention it is moving towards degree 3
though Without political freedom which would guarantee economic freedom property rights
and allow competition of law the Chinese capitalism cannot move any further than degree 3
on McCrawrsquos scale
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative
reponses
Introduction
There are many reasons why Lenovo has become one of the most dominant market leaders
in China as well as in the rest of the world One of the most important events in the Lenovorsquos
corporate history was the acquisition of the IBM personal Computing Division in 2005 which
enabled the company to become a competitive computer manufacture both domestically and
internationally Furthermore throughout Lenovorsquos history the state has been a major
stockholder in the company ndash and like other Chinese State supported enterprises ndash the
Chinese government has supported and protected Lenovo by indirect subsidiaries and
policies which made Lenovo capable of maintaining its dominance When analyzing how
Lenovo managed to develop its organization in a nation that has been marked by serious
economic and politic instability it is important to understand the entrepreneurial spirit that
has driven the company throughout its history Innovation and technological development
have been the core factors that contributed to the strong positioning of the Lenovo Group
Limited as being one of the pioneers in the global computer industry These different
strategic initiatives are somehow all exemplifies for different responses that Lenovo has
made in order survive the demanding IT-industry which is strongly affected by both the
globalization and liberalization of the Chinese market along with the very special type of
capitalism that characterizes the Chinese economy
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer
To start with Lenovo was owned by Legend Holdings Limited until 1994 when it was listed
on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong11 In March 2011 57 of Lenovo was owned by
public shareholders 42 by Legend Holdings Ltd and 1 by the directors12 The
11
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_cid=72 2009-11 12
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
Lenovo 26092011
12 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companyrsquos previous state ownership has implicitly contributed to Lenovorsquos success given the
advantage Lenovo has gained in the domestic market due to the one party-system that has
favoured strong domestic enterprises Although the Chinese government targeted the PC
industry as a national priority in the 1980rsquos Lenovo was not among those companies
selected by the government to be nurtured as the foundation of Chinarsquos future PC industry
Therefore Lenovo was not a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) in its true sense given that it
did not directly receive state support eg Lenovo did not receive a licence to produce PCs
until 199113 Despite the fact that Lenovo was not considered an ldquoordinaryrdquo SOE it still relied
on its parentrsquos the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) labs for the Research and
Development which it could use free of charge Lenovorsquos first production was developed at
ICT whom also facilitated Lenovorsquos first production experience by loaning their personnel
during the process ICT with its links to the government through the CAS supported Lenovo
in its early survival and thus the Chinese state played a significant role in the companyrsquos
early maintenance and growth
As Lenovo made its first Personal Computer under its own brand name in 1991 the
company suddenly became more important in the eyes of the government In 1994 the
company was celebrating its one millionth PC built14 In the same year it was revealed that
domestic computer companies such as Lenovo were going to be protected under a new
policy which was announced by the Chinese ministry of Electronics Lenovo was included in
Chinas ninth Five Year Plan - from 1996 to 2000 - as a key entity to be supported by
government policies15 During the ninth Five Year Plan China invested over $12 billion in the
909 Project which is the most expensive government effort for developing an advanced
semiconductor industry in China16 As a result of the government intervention Lenovo also
received an amount of the subsidy and eventually became the Chinese market leader in
1997 even surpassing IBM The latter was one of the main reasons for IBM to sell its PC
division to Lenovo The fact that Lenovo was able to grow with the indirect support of the
Chinese government reflects the special kind of capitalism that exist in the Chinese
economy Lenovo was operating on a free global market and at the same time enjoying the
beneficial protectionism and subsidies provided by the communist government The
13
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 2109-11 14
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 21092011
16 httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p169033-
19php page 19 21092011
Lenovo 26092011
13 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
legislation also provided the legal framework that would eventually make the acquisition of
IBM possible The law stated that foreign companies who wanted access to China could
only do so by cooperating with a Chinese company This rule was implemented so ensure
that Chinese companies gained eg know-how on technology
Lenovorsquos success started gradually in 1987 when the company expanded its activities to
distribution first for AST (the leading foreign brand in China at that time) and later adding
Hewlett-Packard Toshiba and IBM to its list17 Chuanzh the former CEO even went to the
extent of saying that ldquoOur earliest and best teacher was Hewlett-Packerrdquo18 What Chuanzh
wanted to empathize was that multinational companies such as HP were not only a source of
revenue for Lenovo but also a source of learning By distributing foreign-made PCs Lenovo
learned how to organize sales channels and merchandise PCs on a competitive market
Thus Lenovo began to comprehend its Chinese customers and the PC purchasing habits
making this a key for its dominance in the market for the upcoming years
The demand for computer technology became pervasive during the Third Industrial
Revolution which naturally benefited all computer manufactures around the world A lot of
Chinese industries had not yet reached the industrialization level of the western world
however the IT-industry is an exception The Chinese IT-industry plays a great part in the
Third Industrial Revolution where the immense increase in volume of international trade
investment and finance frequently has been centred in China In addition one could
therefore argue that Lenovo came on the right time with its first PC in 1991 in the exact same
period of history where demand for computer technology increased explaining its enormous
success both in the domestic and international market Lenovo already had a wide network
of distributors at that time and gained great insight in the Chinese consumption pattern
which gave them a huge advantage compared to their strongest competitors Thus it is
necessary to stress the importance of the Third Industrial Revolution as it created a market
Lenovo knew how to profit from by using its competitive advantages
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive
The various Schumpeterian responses that have been made in Lenovorsquos corporate history
enable us to explain how Lenovo became one of the market leaders in the IT-industry The
17
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 19092011 18
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
5 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
ever changing and extremely competitive industry In the end the paper combines the
development of Lenovo and reflects it to the development of the Chinese capitalism
Background
Chinarsquos history in short and a clear definition of Chinese capitalism
Communism
After establishing the Peoplersquos Republic of China in 1949 Mao Zedong managed to organise
the administration and rebuild the economy that had suffered from decades of war in just five
years The new state nationalised the countryrsquos banking system and brought all currency and
credit under centralised control It regulated prices and boosted government revenues by
collecting agricultural taxes By the mid-1950s the communists had rebuilt and expanded the
countryrsquos railroad and highway systems boosted agricultural and industrial production to
their pre-war levels and brought Chinarsquos industry and commerce under direct state control
After the land reform agricultural collectives were reorganized into enormous communes
where wages were calculated according to the principle bdquoto each according to his needsrdquo and
side-line production was banned Procurement prices were too low to cover the production
costs and ceilings were set on the amount of grain that producers could keep for
consumption Over-ambiguous targets and thus falsified production figures let the officials
live in an unreal world of production increases The Great Leap Forward had become a giant
step backwards
By the 1960 the situation had come so serious that Mao had to step side-lines By then
large areas of China were in famine people were exhausted and GDP had declined about
one-third For the next several years agricultural and industrial production returned to normal
levels and labour productivity began to rise
Mao reasserted his power in 1966 and started to bdquoput China back on trackldquo Universities and
schools were closed intellectuals were harassed and any sign of capitalism was enough to
condemn someone as a foe of the Communist Party By 1969 the country was back in
anarchy and the economy was again going downwards
Xiaoping
Chinarsquos next leader Deng Xiaoping who replaced Mao after his death in 1976 started
quickly reforming the country Communes were broken up and replaced with leasing
systems state procurement prices were raised and the Communist Party China (CPC) left
many prices of agricultural goods to be dictated by the market Farmers were allowed to
Lenovo 26092011
6 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
produce on their own and sell the surplus on the newly freed markets to retain any profits
they might earn which gave them an incentive to produce more efficiently so by the end of
the decade the production had grown by roughly 30 per cent Deng also attacked Chinarsquos
food shortages by encouraging families to adopt the one-child policy
Along with the changes in the countryside China started to open up to the rest of the world
Four special economic zones were created which attracted foreign investors with tax
incentives foreign exchange provisions and a lack of regulation By the late 1980s the
government began to open the doors even more aggressively by giving foreign investors
more control of factories long-term land leases and permitting dual exchange rate In 1984
the state applied the dual-price system also to many other industrial products By 1988 both
industrial and agricultural production had reached to new heights with the first one
increasing a fifth annually although state budget continued to support loss-making SOEs In
1989 the government proved the ability to keep its economy under control with wide-scale
retrenchment which saved the country from inflationary spiral Due to the reforms foreign
direct investment to China rose to $112 billion by 1992 two and a half fold increase
compared to the previous year Along the way however the ldquorectificationrdquo program
unleashed a violent series of political events by which the Chinese Communist Party
signalled that despite the liberalising reforms it had no intention of letting loose the reins of
control
With these reforms Chinese communism was in gradual transformation to Chinese
capitalism
Theory
In this section of the paper we describe the theories which create the foundation of the
paper The paper mainly consists of two important theories McCrawrsquos scale and
Schumpeterrsquos entreprenuer theory The two theories are briefly described in the following
McCrawrsquos Scale
McCrawrsquos scale is a scale of four degrees (McCraw 1997)
1 Laissez faire with minimal state intervention
2 frequent uncoordinated state intervention in a mostly free market
3 systematic state guidance of private decision-making
4 through state management and decision-making for the whole economy
Lenovo 26092011
7 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
This scale can be used in order to analyze a countryrsquos nature of capitalism at a certain time
The fourth degree is a plan economy where supply and demand are not controlling
production Instead the production is guided by the state This degree is for instance where
a communist state would be placed At the other end of the scale is the ldquolaissez-fairerdquo degree
where the state intervention is at its minimal On this degree it is supply and demand that
control the market In between we have ldquofrequent but uncoordinated intervention in a mostly
free marketrdquo This is the degree most capitalist countries have Furthermore there is the
ldquosystematic state guidancerdquo left In this degree the state plays a big role but supply and
demand still control many markets State ownership is normal in this degree In this paper we
have used this scale in order to analyze the present nature of Chinese capitalism
Schumpeter ndash the entreprenuer
Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950) presented a theory which suggested that the entreprenuer
plays a big role in the economic development (Joseph Schumpeter 1947) The entreprenuer
creates both adaptive responses and creative responses The creative reponses causes
bdquocreative destructionldquo as it destroys the way certain things used to be done until then in a
certain industry The creative response can not be predicted and is something that creates
new pratices outside the existing practices of the industry
Schumpeter acknowledges the inventer innovator etc however Schumpeter favours the
entreprenuer who actually gets things done Hence Schumpeter was much more interested
in the one who commercialized a product not in the one who invented it An example is the
steam engine which was invented in the 16th century but not commercialized until the early
18th century Until an idea is commercialized it does not matter in an economic perspective
It is worth mentioning that according to Schumpeter it is essential that the entreprenuer has
motivations for doing what heshe does The ability to retain profits is very important in this
context
The present nature of Chinese capitalism
Looking at the present nature of capitalism China must be seen as a state in transition and
the current situation is difficult to define After the harsh reign of Mao Zedong (1949-1976)
the country started its transition in 1978 when Deng implemented the first reforms ldquoand [it]
received a decisive push from 1992 onwardsrdquo1 with the reforms of the 1990s
1 httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
8 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
The implementation of capitalism by a communist party into a communist system is
compulsorily a difficult process The CPC has often been stuck between maintaining
communist values and keeping up the implementation of capitalism This contradiction might
get clearer by a concrete example The Chinese president said in the National Peoplersquos
Congress that the priorities now are promoting equality in education opportunities adopting
progressive employment policies narrowing income gaps and building social security
networks9 Promoting capitalist reforms and keeping up the extraordinary growth brings
does not allow these priorities though and increasing inequality between the benefitting
developed urban areas and the underprivileged rural regions is one of the consequences this
growth has Urging further reforms and heading the country towards being more capitalistic
is clear evidence that ldquoChinarsquos communists have long since given up on true communismrdquo2
The reforms have promoted privatization Foreign Direct Investment private property and
many more capitalist characteristics most of these are only advantageous for the already
developed emerging cities along the Chinese coast To give an example of an achievement
reached by the reforms the Chinese private sector now accounts for approximately 70 of
gross domestic product3 today However the country is only midway through the process
and there are more reforms likely to be made For instance ldquothe capital markets and
securities markets still are underdeveloped because 70 of shares of almost all listed
companies are not tradablerdquo3 The fact that ldquoan experimental program was announced to
make the non-tradable shares tradablerdquo3 illustrates that the CPC also intends to implement
further liberal capitalist characteristics into the Chinese type of capitalism besides trying to
decrease inequality which underlines the contradiction Participating in the global trade made
China join the WTO in 2001 which has enforced China to become more liberal and
capitalistic in terms of their tariffs quotas and licensing requirements The Communist Party
China makes use of any measures in order to preserve the economic upward movement and
ensure the social stability
The Chinese history with long periods of war and the Japanese occupation are still in the
peoplersquos minds which reason the thankfulness for the stability that the CPC has brought the
Chinese in the last decades Hence stability is Chinarsquos highest valued ldquocommodityrdquo and has
had a great influence on the development of Chinese capitalism and thereby also explains
the capitalist environment today For instance the fact that China has pegged their currency
the Yuan to the American dollar and are not willing to let it float which would adjust its value
can be explained by the importance the CPC see in keeping up the economic stability In his
2 httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
3 httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
9 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
report for the American Congress the American economist Wayne M Morrison mentions
ldquoChina continues to ldquomanipulaterdquo its currency in order to give its exporters an unfair trade
advantagerdquo4 An adjustment of their currency would disable the Chinese from keeping their
exports at the current level The increasing exports have earned China the title of the worldrsquos
largest exporter5 and are essential for their economic growth Decreasing exports would
affect the growth rate which then would threaten the countryrsquos stability This shows how the
fear of instability impacts the Chinese decision-making and thereby the present capitalist
environment
Furthermore the influence the growing regional disparity has on the governmentsrsquo decision-
making are another evidence that proves the valuation of stability ldquoBetween 1990 and 2005
Chinarsquos Gini coefficient rose from 0257 to 0447rdquo6 seriously endangering the social stability
in China However as ldquothe countryrsquos phenomenal growth and increasing global heft are
based on a steady [hellip] transition to capitalismrdquo7 and a slowdown or even stagnation of the
countryrsquos growth rate would mean an even greater threat for the countryrsquos stability ldquothe
Communist Party was not willing to slow down growth to address inequality or to leave the
balance purely to market forcesrdquo8 This shows again the huge interest the CPC and the
Peoplersquos Republic of China has in the countryrsquos stability and how it influences important
political decision-making The current growth rate is to a great extend caused by the
capitalist reforms and the slow liberalisation of the Chinese economy This process of
transition will stop at some point though The Chinese are aware that they find themselves in
times of transition and the current growth rate will not last forever which is why Chinarsquos
president promised at the National Peoplersquos Congress (NPC) to ldquofocus more on sustainable
development than rapid economic growthrdquo9
Although the Communist Party China builds up a Chinese capitalism upon a communist
system and embeds many capitalist characteristics in it the state still intervenes a lot to
regulate and control the market The CPC is extremely focussed on keeping the role of the
directive actor They give the pace of moving from a plan economy towards a market-based
economy and the only liberalise the economy to the degree they think is best The state- 4 httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
5 httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-
1864052html 23092011 6 httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
7 httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
8httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Chara
cteristicspdf p14 20092011 9 httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
10 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
owned enterprises that emerged under Maorsquos communist regime and that were characterized
as inefficient over-staffed and not profit-driven have become more efficient less indebted
and through implementation of managers much more profit-driven Nevertheless just as
back at Maorsquos times the CPC uses them as state tools to keep the economy on track
Despite the fact that China has still a lot of government intervention they achieved to enter
the WTO in 200110The entry in the WTO was a push towards more liberalization With the
entry in the WTO China clearly signalised their global orientation and adapting to
international agreements signalised the increasingly important role China is going to play in
the global economy Joining the WTO and adapting to the international rules of exchange
China is facing the global competition now much more than before and the CPC has had to
engage privatization of the SOEs to increase their competitiveness so that the Chinese
economy has been able to maintain their extraordinary growth rate
The present Chinese capitalist environment is very difficult to place on the McCrawrsquos scale of
government intervention On the one hand China is still a communist one-party state
governed by a party which intervenes in the economy to regulate and control the market
According to these facts thorough state management guides China and the state has the
power of decision-making for the whole economy which would mean the Chinese capitalism
had to be placed on the scale at degree 4 However on the other hand the CPC has
dropped most of their communist ideals and keeps transmitting the country by various
reforms into a market-based capitalism Presently the Chinese capitalism fulfils most of the
criteria that characterize capitalism such as labour as a commodity private property a
financial system and a currency The government promotes privatization and makes itself
dependant of international laws which is clear evidence for a decrease in government
intervention The transition towards a common market for example through a reform in the
banking sector which is likely to occur soon keeps moving the Chinese economy towards
capitalism with a systematic state guidance of private decision-making McCrawrsquos degree
number 3 Nevertheless the degree of liberalization is still under complete control of the
CPC and the economy is only as free as the party intends it to be Theoretically the
Communist Party China could rapidly decrease the degree to which the economy is
liberalized change laws and abolish the law that allows for example the property rights
which ensure a capitalist economy This is of course not very likely to happen but it is
important to point out that the whole Chinese capitalist system originates from the
governmentrsquos reforms and guidance Although these reforms have been pushed through and
the Chinese capitalism is more and more liberalized and taken towards a free market-based
10
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
Lenovo 26092011
11 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
economy political freedom is still not given and probably will not be in the close future which
is why China is currently placed on the McCrawrsquos scale of government intervention between
degree 4 and 3 Due to decreasing government intervention it is moving towards degree 3
though Without political freedom which would guarantee economic freedom property rights
and allow competition of law the Chinese capitalism cannot move any further than degree 3
on McCrawrsquos scale
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative
reponses
Introduction
There are many reasons why Lenovo has become one of the most dominant market leaders
in China as well as in the rest of the world One of the most important events in the Lenovorsquos
corporate history was the acquisition of the IBM personal Computing Division in 2005 which
enabled the company to become a competitive computer manufacture both domestically and
internationally Furthermore throughout Lenovorsquos history the state has been a major
stockholder in the company ndash and like other Chinese State supported enterprises ndash the
Chinese government has supported and protected Lenovo by indirect subsidiaries and
policies which made Lenovo capable of maintaining its dominance When analyzing how
Lenovo managed to develop its organization in a nation that has been marked by serious
economic and politic instability it is important to understand the entrepreneurial spirit that
has driven the company throughout its history Innovation and technological development
have been the core factors that contributed to the strong positioning of the Lenovo Group
Limited as being one of the pioneers in the global computer industry These different
strategic initiatives are somehow all exemplifies for different responses that Lenovo has
made in order survive the demanding IT-industry which is strongly affected by both the
globalization and liberalization of the Chinese market along with the very special type of
capitalism that characterizes the Chinese economy
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer
To start with Lenovo was owned by Legend Holdings Limited until 1994 when it was listed
on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong11 In March 2011 57 of Lenovo was owned by
public shareholders 42 by Legend Holdings Ltd and 1 by the directors12 The
11
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_cid=72 2009-11 12
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
Lenovo 26092011
12 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companyrsquos previous state ownership has implicitly contributed to Lenovorsquos success given the
advantage Lenovo has gained in the domestic market due to the one party-system that has
favoured strong domestic enterprises Although the Chinese government targeted the PC
industry as a national priority in the 1980rsquos Lenovo was not among those companies
selected by the government to be nurtured as the foundation of Chinarsquos future PC industry
Therefore Lenovo was not a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) in its true sense given that it
did not directly receive state support eg Lenovo did not receive a licence to produce PCs
until 199113 Despite the fact that Lenovo was not considered an ldquoordinaryrdquo SOE it still relied
on its parentrsquos the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) labs for the Research and
Development which it could use free of charge Lenovorsquos first production was developed at
ICT whom also facilitated Lenovorsquos first production experience by loaning their personnel
during the process ICT with its links to the government through the CAS supported Lenovo
in its early survival and thus the Chinese state played a significant role in the companyrsquos
early maintenance and growth
As Lenovo made its first Personal Computer under its own brand name in 1991 the
company suddenly became more important in the eyes of the government In 1994 the
company was celebrating its one millionth PC built14 In the same year it was revealed that
domestic computer companies such as Lenovo were going to be protected under a new
policy which was announced by the Chinese ministry of Electronics Lenovo was included in
Chinas ninth Five Year Plan - from 1996 to 2000 - as a key entity to be supported by
government policies15 During the ninth Five Year Plan China invested over $12 billion in the
909 Project which is the most expensive government effort for developing an advanced
semiconductor industry in China16 As a result of the government intervention Lenovo also
received an amount of the subsidy and eventually became the Chinese market leader in
1997 even surpassing IBM The latter was one of the main reasons for IBM to sell its PC
division to Lenovo The fact that Lenovo was able to grow with the indirect support of the
Chinese government reflects the special kind of capitalism that exist in the Chinese
economy Lenovo was operating on a free global market and at the same time enjoying the
beneficial protectionism and subsidies provided by the communist government The
13
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 2109-11 14
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 21092011
16 httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p169033-
19php page 19 21092011
Lenovo 26092011
13 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
legislation also provided the legal framework that would eventually make the acquisition of
IBM possible The law stated that foreign companies who wanted access to China could
only do so by cooperating with a Chinese company This rule was implemented so ensure
that Chinese companies gained eg know-how on technology
Lenovorsquos success started gradually in 1987 when the company expanded its activities to
distribution first for AST (the leading foreign brand in China at that time) and later adding
Hewlett-Packard Toshiba and IBM to its list17 Chuanzh the former CEO even went to the
extent of saying that ldquoOur earliest and best teacher was Hewlett-Packerrdquo18 What Chuanzh
wanted to empathize was that multinational companies such as HP were not only a source of
revenue for Lenovo but also a source of learning By distributing foreign-made PCs Lenovo
learned how to organize sales channels and merchandise PCs on a competitive market
Thus Lenovo began to comprehend its Chinese customers and the PC purchasing habits
making this a key for its dominance in the market for the upcoming years
The demand for computer technology became pervasive during the Third Industrial
Revolution which naturally benefited all computer manufactures around the world A lot of
Chinese industries had not yet reached the industrialization level of the western world
however the IT-industry is an exception The Chinese IT-industry plays a great part in the
Third Industrial Revolution where the immense increase in volume of international trade
investment and finance frequently has been centred in China In addition one could
therefore argue that Lenovo came on the right time with its first PC in 1991 in the exact same
period of history where demand for computer technology increased explaining its enormous
success both in the domestic and international market Lenovo already had a wide network
of distributors at that time and gained great insight in the Chinese consumption pattern
which gave them a huge advantage compared to their strongest competitors Thus it is
necessary to stress the importance of the Third Industrial Revolution as it created a market
Lenovo knew how to profit from by using its competitive advantages
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive
The various Schumpeterian responses that have been made in Lenovorsquos corporate history
enable us to explain how Lenovo became one of the market leaders in the IT-industry The
17
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 19092011 18
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
6 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
produce on their own and sell the surplus on the newly freed markets to retain any profits
they might earn which gave them an incentive to produce more efficiently so by the end of
the decade the production had grown by roughly 30 per cent Deng also attacked Chinarsquos
food shortages by encouraging families to adopt the one-child policy
Along with the changes in the countryside China started to open up to the rest of the world
Four special economic zones were created which attracted foreign investors with tax
incentives foreign exchange provisions and a lack of regulation By the late 1980s the
government began to open the doors even more aggressively by giving foreign investors
more control of factories long-term land leases and permitting dual exchange rate In 1984
the state applied the dual-price system also to many other industrial products By 1988 both
industrial and agricultural production had reached to new heights with the first one
increasing a fifth annually although state budget continued to support loss-making SOEs In
1989 the government proved the ability to keep its economy under control with wide-scale
retrenchment which saved the country from inflationary spiral Due to the reforms foreign
direct investment to China rose to $112 billion by 1992 two and a half fold increase
compared to the previous year Along the way however the ldquorectificationrdquo program
unleashed a violent series of political events by which the Chinese Communist Party
signalled that despite the liberalising reforms it had no intention of letting loose the reins of
control
With these reforms Chinese communism was in gradual transformation to Chinese
capitalism
Theory
In this section of the paper we describe the theories which create the foundation of the
paper The paper mainly consists of two important theories McCrawrsquos scale and
Schumpeterrsquos entreprenuer theory The two theories are briefly described in the following
McCrawrsquos Scale
McCrawrsquos scale is a scale of four degrees (McCraw 1997)
1 Laissez faire with minimal state intervention
2 frequent uncoordinated state intervention in a mostly free market
3 systematic state guidance of private decision-making
4 through state management and decision-making for the whole economy
Lenovo 26092011
7 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
This scale can be used in order to analyze a countryrsquos nature of capitalism at a certain time
The fourth degree is a plan economy where supply and demand are not controlling
production Instead the production is guided by the state This degree is for instance where
a communist state would be placed At the other end of the scale is the ldquolaissez-fairerdquo degree
where the state intervention is at its minimal On this degree it is supply and demand that
control the market In between we have ldquofrequent but uncoordinated intervention in a mostly
free marketrdquo This is the degree most capitalist countries have Furthermore there is the
ldquosystematic state guidancerdquo left In this degree the state plays a big role but supply and
demand still control many markets State ownership is normal in this degree In this paper we
have used this scale in order to analyze the present nature of Chinese capitalism
Schumpeter ndash the entreprenuer
Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950) presented a theory which suggested that the entreprenuer
plays a big role in the economic development (Joseph Schumpeter 1947) The entreprenuer
creates both adaptive responses and creative responses The creative reponses causes
bdquocreative destructionldquo as it destroys the way certain things used to be done until then in a
certain industry The creative response can not be predicted and is something that creates
new pratices outside the existing practices of the industry
Schumpeter acknowledges the inventer innovator etc however Schumpeter favours the
entreprenuer who actually gets things done Hence Schumpeter was much more interested
in the one who commercialized a product not in the one who invented it An example is the
steam engine which was invented in the 16th century but not commercialized until the early
18th century Until an idea is commercialized it does not matter in an economic perspective
It is worth mentioning that according to Schumpeter it is essential that the entreprenuer has
motivations for doing what heshe does The ability to retain profits is very important in this
context
The present nature of Chinese capitalism
Looking at the present nature of capitalism China must be seen as a state in transition and
the current situation is difficult to define After the harsh reign of Mao Zedong (1949-1976)
the country started its transition in 1978 when Deng implemented the first reforms ldquoand [it]
received a decisive push from 1992 onwardsrdquo1 with the reforms of the 1990s
1 httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
8 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
The implementation of capitalism by a communist party into a communist system is
compulsorily a difficult process The CPC has often been stuck between maintaining
communist values and keeping up the implementation of capitalism This contradiction might
get clearer by a concrete example The Chinese president said in the National Peoplersquos
Congress that the priorities now are promoting equality in education opportunities adopting
progressive employment policies narrowing income gaps and building social security
networks9 Promoting capitalist reforms and keeping up the extraordinary growth brings
does not allow these priorities though and increasing inequality between the benefitting
developed urban areas and the underprivileged rural regions is one of the consequences this
growth has Urging further reforms and heading the country towards being more capitalistic
is clear evidence that ldquoChinarsquos communists have long since given up on true communismrdquo2
The reforms have promoted privatization Foreign Direct Investment private property and
many more capitalist characteristics most of these are only advantageous for the already
developed emerging cities along the Chinese coast To give an example of an achievement
reached by the reforms the Chinese private sector now accounts for approximately 70 of
gross domestic product3 today However the country is only midway through the process
and there are more reforms likely to be made For instance ldquothe capital markets and
securities markets still are underdeveloped because 70 of shares of almost all listed
companies are not tradablerdquo3 The fact that ldquoan experimental program was announced to
make the non-tradable shares tradablerdquo3 illustrates that the CPC also intends to implement
further liberal capitalist characteristics into the Chinese type of capitalism besides trying to
decrease inequality which underlines the contradiction Participating in the global trade made
China join the WTO in 2001 which has enforced China to become more liberal and
capitalistic in terms of their tariffs quotas and licensing requirements The Communist Party
China makes use of any measures in order to preserve the economic upward movement and
ensure the social stability
The Chinese history with long periods of war and the Japanese occupation are still in the
peoplersquos minds which reason the thankfulness for the stability that the CPC has brought the
Chinese in the last decades Hence stability is Chinarsquos highest valued ldquocommodityrdquo and has
had a great influence on the development of Chinese capitalism and thereby also explains
the capitalist environment today For instance the fact that China has pegged their currency
the Yuan to the American dollar and are not willing to let it float which would adjust its value
can be explained by the importance the CPC see in keeping up the economic stability In his
2 httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
3 httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
9 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
report for the American Congress the American economist Wayne M Morrison mentions
ldquoChina continues to ldquomanipulaterdquo its currency in order to give its exporters an unfair trade
advantagerdquo4 An adjustment of their currency would disable the Chinese from keeping their
exports at the current level The increasing exports have earned China the title of the worldrsquos
largest exporter5 and are essential for their economic growth Decreasing exports would
affect the growth rate which then would threaten the countryrsquos stability This shows how the
fear of instability impacts the Chinese decision-making and thereby the present capitalist
environment
Furthermore the influence the growing regional disparity has on the governmentsrsquo decision-
making are another evidence that proves the valuation of stability ldquoBetween 1990 and 2005
Chinarsquos Gini coefficient rose from 0257 to 0447rdquo6 seriously endangering the social stability
in China However as ldquothe countryrsquos phenomenal growth and increasing global heft are
based on a steady [hellip] transition to capitalismrdquo7 and a slowdown or even stagnation of the
countryrsquos growth rate would mean an even greater threat for the countryrsquos stability ldquothe
Communist Party was not willing to slow down growth to address inequality or to leave the
balance purely to market forcesrdquo8 This shows again the huge interest the CPC and the
Peoplersquos Republic of China has in the countryrsquos stability and how it influences important
political decision-making The current growth rate is to a great extend caused by the
capitalist reforms and the slow liberalisation of the Chinese economy This process of
transition will stop at some point though The Chinese are aware that they find themselves in
times of transition and the current growth rate will not last forever which is why Chinarsquos
president promised at the National Peoplersquos Congress (NPC) to ldquofocus more on sustainable
development than rapid economic growthrdquo9
Although the Communist Party China builds up a Chinese capitalism upon a communist
system and embeds many capitalist characteristics in it the state still intervenes a lot to
regulate and control the market The CPC is extremely focussed on keeping the role of the
directive actor They give the pace of moving from a plan economy towards a market-based
economy and the only liberalise the economy to the degree they think is best The state- 4 httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
5 httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-
1864052html 23092011 6 httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
7 httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
8httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Chara
cteristicspdf p14 20092011 9 httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
10 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
owned enterprises that emerged under Maorsquos communist regime and that were characterized
as inefficient over-staffed and not profit-driven have become more efficient less indebted
and through implementation of managers much more profit-driven Nevertheless just as
back at Maorsquos times the CPC uses them as state tools to keep the economy on track
Despite the fact that China has still a lot of government intervention they achieved to enter
the WTO in 200110The entry in the WTO was a push towards more liberalization With the
entry in the WTO China clearly signalised their global orientation and adapting to
international agreements signalised the increasingly important role China is going to play in
the global economy Joining the WTO and adapting to the international rules of exchange
China is facing the global competition now much more than before and the CPC has had to
engage privatization of the SOEs to increase their competitiveness so that the Chinese
economy has been able to maintain their extraordinary growth rate
The present Chinese capitalist environment is very difficult to place on the McCrawrsquos scale of
government intervention On the one hand China is still a communist one-party state
governed by a party which intervenes in the economy to regulate and control the market
According to these facts thorough state management guides China and the state has the
power of decision-making for the whole economy which would mean the Chinese capitalism
had to be placed on the scale at degree 4 However on the other hand the CPC has
dropped most of their communist ideals and keeps transmitting the country by various
reforms into a market-based capitalism Presently the Chinese capitalism fulfils most of the
criteria that characterize capitalism such as labour as a commodity private property a
financial system and a currency The government promotes privatization and makes itself
dependant of international laws which is clear evidence for a decrease in government
intervention The transition towards a common market for example through a reform in the
banking sector which is likely to occur soon keeps moving the Chinese economy towards
capitalism with a systematic state guidance of private decision-making McCrawrsquos degree
number 3 Nevertheless the degree of liberalization is still under complete control of the
CPC and the economy is only as free as the party intends it to be Theoretically the
Communist Party China could rapidly decrease the degree to which the economy is
liberalized change laws and abolish the law that allows for example the property rights
which ensure a capitalist economy This is of course not very likely to happen but it is
important to point out that the whole Chinese capitalist system originates from the
governmentrsquos reforms and guidance Although these reforms have been pushed through and
the Chinese capitalism is more and more liberalized and taken towards a free market-based
10
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
Lenovo 26092011
11 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
economy political freedom is still not given and probably will not be in the close future which
is why China is currently placed on the McCrawrsquos scale of government intervention between
degree 4 and 3 Due to decreasing government intervention it is moving towards degree 3
though Without political freedom which would guarantee economic freedom property rights
and allow competition of law the Chinese capitalism cannot move any further than degree 3
on McCrawrsquos scale
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative
reponses
Introduction
There are many reasons why Lenovo has become one of the most dominant market leaders
in China as well as in the rest of the world One of the most important events in the Lenovorsquos
corporate history was the acquisition of the IBM personal Computing Division in 2005 which
enabled the company to become a competitive computer manufacture both domestically and
internationally Furthermore throughout Lenovorsquos history the state has been a major
stockholder in the company ndash and like other Chinese State supported enterprises ndash the
Chinese government has supported and protected Lenovo by indirect subsidiaries and
policies which made Lenovo capable of maintaining its dominance When analyzing how
Lenovo managed to develop its organization in a nation that has been marked by serious
economic and politic instability it is important to understand the entrepreneurial spirit that
has driven the company throughout its history Innovation and technological development
have been the core factors that contributed to the strong positioning of the Lenovo Group
Limited as being one of the pioneers in the global computer industry These different
strategic initiatives are somehow all exemplifies for different responses that Lenovo has
made in order survive the demanding IT-industry which is strongly affected by both the
globalization and liberalization of the Chinese market along with the very special type of
capitalism that characterizes the Chinese economy
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer
To start with Lenovo was owned by Legend Holdings Limited until 1994 when it was listed
on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong11 In March 2011 57 of Lenovo was owned by
public shareholders 42 by Legend Holdings Ltd and 1 by the directors12 The
11
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_cid=72 2009-11 12
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
Lenovo 26092011
12 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companyrsquos previous state ownership has implicitly contributed to Lenovorsquos success given the
advantage Lenovo has gained in the domestic market due to the one party-system that has
favoured strong domestic enterprises Although the Chinese government targeted the PC
industry as a national priority in the 1980rsquos Lenovo was not among those companies
selected by the government to be nurtured as the foundation of Chinarsquos future PC industry
Therefore Lenovo was not a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) in its true sense given that it
did not directly receive state support eg Lenovo did not receive a licence to produce PCs
until 199113 Despite the fact that Lenovo was not considered an ldquoordinaryrdquo SOE it still relied
on its parentrsquos the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) labs for the Research and
Development which it could use free of charge Lenovorsquos first production was developed at
ICT whom also facilitated Lenovorsquos first production experience by loaning their personnel
during the process ICT with its links to the government through the CAS supported Lenovo
in its early survival and thus the Chinese state played a significant role in the companyrsquos
early maintenance and growth
As Lenovo made its first Personal Computer under its own brand name in 1991 the
company suddenly became more important in the eyes of the government In 1994 the
company was celebrating its one millionth PC built14 In the same year it was revealed that
domestic computer companies such as Lenovo were going to be protected under a new
policy which was announced by the Chinese ministry of Electronics Lenovo was included in
Chinas ninth Five Year Plan - from 1996 to 2000 - as a key entity to be supported by
government policies15 During the ninth Five Year Plan China invested over $12 billion in the
909 Project which is the most expensive government effort for developing an advanced
semiconductor industry in China16 As a result of the government intervention Lenovo also
received an amount of the subsidy and eventually became the Chinese market leader in
1997 even surpassing IBM The latter was one of the main reasons for IBM to sell its PC
division to Lenovo The fact that Lenovo was able to grow with the indirect support of the
Chinese government reflects the special kind of capitalism that exist in the Chinese
economy Lenovo was operating on a free global market and at the same time enjoying the
beneficial protectionism and subsidies provided by the communist government The
13
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 2109-11 14
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 21092011
16 httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p169033-
19php page 19 21092011
Lenovo 26092011
13 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
legislation also provided the legal framework that would eventually make the acquisition of
IBM possible The law stated that foreign companies who wanted access to China could
only do so by cooperating with a Chinese company This rule was implemented so ensure
that Chinese companies gained eg know-how on technology
Lenovorsquos success started gradually in 1987 when the company expanded its activities to
distribution first for AST (the leading foreign brand in China at that time) and later adding
Hewlett-Packard Toshiba and IBM to its list17 Chuanzh the former CEO even went to the
extent of saying that ldquoOur earliest and best teacher was Hewlett-Packerrdquo18 What Chuanzh
wanted to empathize was that multinational companies such as HP were not only a source of
revenue for Lenovo but also a source of learning By distributing foreign-made PCs Lenovo
learned how to organize sales channels and merchandise PCs on a competitive market
Thus Lenovo began to comprehend its Chinese customers and the PC purchasing habits
making this a key for its dominance in the market for the upcoming years
The demand for computer technology became pervasive during the Third Industrial
Revolution which naturally benefited all computer manufactures around the world A lot of
Chinese industries had not yet reached the industrialization level of the western world
however the IT-industry is an exception The Chinese IT-industry plays a great part in the
Third Industrial Revolution where the immense increase in volume of international trade
investment and finance frequently has been centred in China In addition one could
therefore argue that Lenovo came on the right time with its first PC in 1991 in the exact same
period of history where demand for computer technology increased explaining its enormous
success both in the domestic and international market Lenovo already had a wide network
of distributors at that time and gained great insight in the Chinese consumption pattern
which gave them a huge advantage compared to their strongest competitors Thus it is
necessary to stress the importance of the Third Industrial Revolution as it created a market
Lenovo knew how to profit from by using its competitive advantages
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive
The various Schumpeterian responses that have been made in Lenovorsquos corporate history
enable us to explain how Lenovo became one of the market leaders in the IT-industry The
17
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 19092011 18
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
7 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
This scale can be used in order to analyze a countryrsquos nature of capitalism at a certain time
The fourth degree is a plan economy where supply and demand are not controlling
production Instead the production is guided by the state This degree is for instance where
a communist state would be placed At the other end of the scale is the ldquolaissez-fairerdquo degree
where the state intervention is at its minimal On this degree it is supply and demand that
control the market In between we have ldquofrequent but uncoordinated intervention in a mostly
free marketrdquo This is the degree most capitalist countries have Furthermore there is the
ldquosystematic state guidancerdquo left In this degree the state plays a big role but supply and
demand still control many markets State ownership is normal in this degree In this paper we
have used this scale in order to analyze the present nature of Chinese capitalism
Schumpeter ndash the entreprenuer
Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950) presented a theory which suggested that the entreprenuer
plays a big role in the economic development (Joseph Schumpeter 1947) The entreprenuer
creates both adaptive responses and creative responses The creative reponses causes
bdquocreative destructionldquo as it destroys the way certain things used to be done until then in a
certain industry The creative response can not be predicted and is something that creates
new pratices outside the existing practices of the industry
Schumpeter acknowledges the inventer innovator etc however Schumpeter favours the
entreprenuer who actually gets things done Hence Schumpeter was much more interested
in the one who commercialized a product not in the one who invented it An example is the
steam engine which was invented in the 16th century but not commercialized until the early
18th century Until an idea is commercialized it does not matter in an economic perspective
It is worth mentioning that according to Schumpeter it is essential that the entreprenuer has
motivations for doing what heshe does The ability to retain profits is very important in this
context
The present nature of Chinese capitalism
Looking at the present nature of capitalism China must be seen as a state in transition and
the current situation is difficult to define After the harsh reign of Mao Zedong (1949-1976)
the country started its transition in 1978 when Deng implemented the first reforms ldquoand [it]
received a decisive push from 1992 onwardsrdquo1 with the reforms of the 1990s
1 httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
8 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
The implementation of capitalism by a communist party into a communist system is
compulsorily a difficult process The CPC has often been stuck between maintaining
communist values and keeping up the implementation of capitalism This contradiction might
get clearer by a concrete example The Chinese president said in the National Peoplersquos
Congress that the priorities now are promoting equality in education opportunities adopting
progressive employment policies narrowing income gaps and building social security
networks9 Promoting capitalist reforms and keeping up the extraordinary growth brings
does not allow these priorities though and increasing inequality between the benefitting
developed urban areas and the underprivileged rural regions is one of the consequences this
growth has Urging further reforms and heading the country towards being more capitalistic
is clear evidence that ldquoChinarsquos communists have long since given up on true communismrdquo2
The reforms have promoted privatization Foreign Direct Investment private property and
many more capitalist characteristics most of these are only advantageous for the already
developed emerging cities along the Chinese coast To give an example of an achievement
reached by the reforms the Chinese private sector now accounts for approximately 70 of
gross domestic product3 today However the country is only midway through the process
and there are more reforms likely to be made For instance ldquothe capital markets and
securities markets still are underdeveloped because 70 of shares of almost all listed
companies are not tradablerdquo3 The fact that ldquoan experimental program was announced to
make the non-tradable shares tradablerdquo3 illustrates that the CPC also intends to implement
further liberal capitalist characteristics into the Chinese type of capitalism besides trying to
decrease inequality which underlines the contradiction Participating in the global trade made
China join the WTO in 2001 which has enforced China to become more liberal and
capitalistic in terms of their tariffs quotas and licensing requirements The Communist Party
China makes use of any measures in order to preserve the economic upward movement and
ensure the social stability
The Chinese history with long periods of war and the Japanese occupation are still in the
peoplersquos minds which reason the thankfulness for the stability that the CPC has brought the
Chinese in the last decades Hence stability is Chinarsquos highest valued ldquocommodityrdquo and has
had a great influence on the development of Chinese capitalism and thereby also explains
the capitalist environment today For instance the fact that China has pegged their currency
the Yuan to the American dollar and are not willing to let it float which would adjust its value
can be explained by the importance the CPC see in keeping up the economic stability In his
2 httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
3 httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
9 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
report for the American Congress the American economist Wayne M Morrison mentions
ldquoChina continues to ldquomanipulaterdquo its currency in order to give its exporters an unfair trade
advantagerdquo4 An adjustment of their currency would disable the Chinese from keeping their
exports at the current level The increasing exports have earned China the title of the worldrsquos
largest exporter5 and are essential for their economic growth Decreasing exports would
affect the growth rate which then would threaten the countryrsquos stability This shows how the
fear of instability impacts the Chinese decision-making and thereby the present capitalist
environment
Furthermore the influence the growing regional disparity has on the governmentsrsquo decision-
making are another evidence that proves the valuation of stability ldquoBetween 1990 and 2005
Chinarsquos Gini coefficient rose from 0257 to 0447rdquo6 seriously endangering the social stability
in China However as ldquothe countryrsquos phenomenal growth and increasing global heft are
based on a steady [hellip] transition to capitalismrdquo7 and a slowdown or even stagnation of the
countryrsquos growth rate would mean an even greater threat for the countryrsquos stability ldquothe
Communist Party was not willing to slow down growth to address inequality or to leave the
balance purely to market forcesrdquo8 This shows again the huge interest the CPC and the
Peoplersquos Republic of China has in the countryrsquos stability and how it influences important
political decision-making The current growth rate is to a great extend caused by the
capitalist reforms and the slow liberalisation of the Chinese economy This process of
transition will stop at some point though The Chinese are aware that they find themselves in
times of transition and the current growth rate will not last forever which is why Chinarsquos
president promised at the National Peoplersquos Congress (NPC) to ldquofocus more on sustainable
development than rapid economic growthrdquo9
Although the Communist Party China builds up a Chinese capitalism upon a communist
system and embeds many capitalist characteristics in it the state still intervenes a lot to
regulate and control the market The CPC is extremely focussed on keeping the role of the
directive actor They give the pace of moving from a plan economy towards a market-based
economy and the only liberalise the economy to the degree they think is best The state- 4 httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
5 httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-
1864052html 23092011 6 httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
7 httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
8httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Chara
cteristicspdf p14 20092011 9 httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
10 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
owned enterprises that emerged under Maorsquos communist regime and that were characterized
as inefficient over-staffed and not profit-driven have become more efficient less indebted
and through implementation of managers much more profit-driven Nevertheless just as
back at Maorsquos times the CPC uses them as state tools to keep the economy on track
Despite the fact that China has still a lot of government intervention they achieved to enter
the WTO in 200110The entry in the WTO was a push towards more liberalization With the
entry in the WTO China clearly signalised their global orientation and adapting to
international agreements signalised the increasingly important role China is going to play in
the global economy Joining the WTO and adapting to the international rules of exchange
China is facing the global competition now much more than before and the CPC has had to
engage privatization of the SOEs to increase their competitiveness so that the Chinese
economy has been able to maintain their extraordinary growth rate
The present Chinese capitalist environment is very difficult to place on the McCrawrsquos scale of
government intervention On the one hand China is still a communist one-party state
governed by a party which intervenes in the economy to regulate and control the market
According to these facts thorough state management guides China and the state has the
power of decision-making for the whole economy which would mean the Chinese capitalism
had to be placed on the scale at degree 4 However on the other hand the CPC has
dropped most of their communist ideals and keeps transmitting the country by various
reforms into a market-based capitalism Presently the Chinese capitalism fulfils most of the
criteria that characterize capitalism such as labour as a commodity private property a
financial system and a currency The government promotes privatization and makes itself
dependant of international laws which is clear evidence for a decrease in government
intervention The transition towards a common market for example through a reform in the
banking sector which is likely to occur soon keeps moving the Chinese economy towards
capitalism with a systematic state guidance of private decision-making McCrawrsquos degree
number 3 Nevertheless the degree of liberalization is still under complete control of the
CPC and the economy is only as free as the party intends it to be Theoretically the
Communist Party China could rapidly decrease the degree to which the economy is
liberalized change laws and abolish the law that allows for example the property rights
which ensure a capitalist economy This is of course not very likely to happen but it is
important to point out that the whole Chinese capitalist system originates from the
governmentrsquos reforms and guidance Although these reforms have been pushed through and
the Chinese capitalism is more and more liberalized and taken towards a free market-based
10
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
Lenovo 26092011
11 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
economy political freedom is still not given and probably will not be in the close future which
is why China is currently placed on the McCrawrsquos scale of government intervention between
degree 4 and 3 Due to decreasing government intervention it is moving towards degree 3
though Without political freedom which would guarantee economic freedom property rights
and allow competition of law the Chinese capitalism cannot move any further than degree 3
on McCrawrsquos scale
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative
reponses
Introduction
There are many reasons why Lenovo has become one of the most dominant market leaders
in China as well as in the rest of the world One of the most important events in the Lenovorsquos
corporate history was the acquisition of the IBM personal Computing Division in 2005 which
enabled the company to become a competitive computer manufacture both domestically and
internationally Furthermore throughout Lenovorsquos history the state has been a major
stockholder in the company ndash and like other Chinese State supported enterprises ndash the
Chinese government has supported and protected Lenovo by indirect subsidiaries and
policies which made Lenovo capable of maintaining its dominance When analyzing how
Lenovo managed to develop its organization in a nation that has been marked by serious
economic and politic instability it is important to understand the entrepreneurial spirit that
has driven the company throughout its history Innovation and technological development
have been the core factors that contributed to the strong positioning of the Lenovo Group
Limited as being one of the pioneers in the global computer industry These different
strategic initiatives are somehow all exemplifies for different responses that Lenovo has
made in order survive the demanding IT-industry which is strongly affected by both the
globalization and liberalization of the Chinese market along with the very special type of
capitalism that characterizes the Chinese economy
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer
To start with Lenovo was owned by Legend Holdings Limited until 1994 when it was listed
on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong11 In March 2011 57 of Lenovo was owned by
public shareholders 42 by Legend Holdings Ltd and 1 by the directors12 The
11
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_cid=72 2009-11 12
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
Lenovo 26092011
12 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companyrsquos previous state ownership has implicitly contributed to Lenovorsquos success given the
advantage Lenovo has gained in the domestic market due to the one party-system that has
favoured strong domestic enterprises Although the Chinese government targeted the PC
industry as a national priority in the 1980rsquos Lenovo was not among those companies
selected by the government to be nurtured as the foundation of Chinarsquos future PC industry
Therefore Lenovo was not a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) in its true sense given that it
did not directly receive state support eg Lenovo did not receive a licence to produce PCs
until 199113 Despite the fact that Lenovo was not considered an ldquoordinaryrdquo SOE it still relied
on its parentrsquos the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) labs for the Research and
Development which it could use free of charge Lenovorsquos first production was developed at
ICT whom also facilitated Lenovorsquos first production experience by loaning their personnel
during the process ICT with its links to the government through the CAS supported Lenovo
in its early survival and thus the Chinese state played a significant role in the companyrsquos
early maintenance and growth
As Lenovo made its first Personal Computer under its own brand name in 1991 the
company suddenly became more important in the eyes of the government In 1994 the
company was celebrating its one millionth PC built14 In the same year it was revealed that
domestic computer companies such as Lenovo were going to be protected under a new
policy which was announced by the Chinese ministry of Electronics Lenovo was included in
Chinas ninth Five Year Plan - from 1996 to 2000 - as a key entity to be supported by
government policies15 During the ninth Five Year Plan China invested over $12 billion in the
909 Project which is the most expensive government effort for developing an advanced
semiconductor industry in China16 As a result of the government intervention Lenovo also
received an amount of the subsidy and eventually became the Chinese market leader in
1997 even surpassing IBM The latter was one of the main reasons for IBM to sell its PC
division to Lenovo The fact that Lenovo was able to grow with the indirect support of the
Chinese government reflects the special kind of capitalism that exist in the Chinese
economy Lenovo was operating on a free global market and at the same time enjoying the
beneficial protectionism and subsidies provided by the communist government The
13
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 2109-11 14
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 21092011
16 httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p169033-
19php page 19 21092011
Lenovo 26092011
13 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
legislation also provided the legal framework that would eventually make the acquisition of
IBM possible The law stated that foreign companies who wanted access to China could
only do so by cooperating with a Chinese company This rule was implemented so ensure
that Chinese companies gained eg know-how on technology
Lenovorsquos success started gradually in 1987 when the company expanded its activities to
distribution first for AST (the leading foreign brand in China at that time) and later adding
Hewlett-Packard Toshiba and IBM to its list17 Chuanzh the former CEO even went to the
extent of saying that ldquoOur earliest and best teacher was Hewlett-Packerrdquo18 What Chuanzh
wanted to empathize was that multinational companies such as HP were not only a source of
revenue for Lenovo but also a source of learning By distributing foreign-made PCs Lenovo
learned how to organize sales channels and merchandise PCs on a competitive market
Thus Lenovo began to comprehend its Chinese customers and the PC purchasing habits
making this a key for its dominance in the market for the upcoming years
The demand for computer technology became pervasive during the Third Industrial
Revolution which naturally benefited all computer manufactures around the world A lot of
Chinese industries had not yet reached the industrialization level of the western world
however the IT-industry is an exception The Chinese IT-industry plays a great part in the
Third Industrial Revolution where the immense increase in volume of international trade
investment and finance frequently has been centred in China In addition one could
therefore argue that Lenovo came on the right time with its first PC in 1991 in the exact same
period of history where demand for computer technology increased explaining its enormous
success both in the domestic and international market Lenovo already had a wide network
of distributors at that time and gained great insight in the Chinese consumption pattern
which gave them a huge advantage compared to their strongest competitors Thus it is
necessary to stress the importance of the Third Industrial Revolution as it created a market
Lenovo knew how to profit from by using its competitive advantages
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive
The various Schumpeterian responses that have been made in Lenovorsquos corporate history
enable us to explain how Lenovo became one of the market leaders in the IT-industry The
17
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 19092011 18
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
8 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
The implementation of capitalism by a communist party into a communist system is
compulsorily a difficult process The CPC has often been stuck between maintaining
communist values and keeping up the implementation of capitalism This contradiction might
get clearer by a concrete example The Chinese president said in the National Peoplersquos
Congress that the priorities now are promoting equality in education opportunities adopting
progressive employment policies narrowing income gaps and building social security
networks9 Promoting capitalist reforms and keeping up the extraordinary growth brings
does not allow these priorities though and increasing inequality between the benefitting
developed urban areas and the underprivileged rural regions is one of the consequences this
growth has Urging further reforms and heading the country towards being more capitalistic
is clear evidence that ldquoChinarsquos communists have long since given up on true communismrdquo2
The reforms have promoted privatization Foreign Direct Investment private property and
many more capitalist characteristics most of these are only advantageous for the already
developed emerging cities along the Chinese coast To give an example of an achievement
reached by the reforms the Chinese private sector now accounts for approximately 70 of
gross domestic product3 today However the country is only midway through the process
and there are more reforms likely to be made For instance ldquothe capital markets and
securities markets still are underdeveloped because 70 of shares of almost all listed
companies are not tradablerdquo3 The fact that ldquoan experimental program was announced to
make the non-tradable shares tradablerdquo3 illustrates that the CPC also intends to implement
further liberal capitalist characteristics into the Chinese type of capitalism besides trying to
decrease inequality which underlines the contradiction Participating in the global trade made
China join the WTO in 2001 which has enforced China to become more liberal and
capitalistic in terms of their tariffs quotas and licensing requirements The Communist Party
China makes use of any measures in order to preserve the economic upward movement and
ensure the social stability
The Chinese history with long periods of war and the Japanese occupation are still in the
peoplersquos minds which reason the thankfulness for the stability that the CPC has brought the
Chinese in the last decades Hence stability is Chinarsquos highest valued ldquocommodityrdquo and has
had a great influence on the development of Chinese capitalism and thereby also explains
the capitalist environment today For instance the fact that China has pegged their currency
the Yuan to the American dollar and are not willing to let it float which would adjust its value
can be explained by the importance the CPC see in keeping up the economic stability In his
2 httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
3 httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
9 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
report for the American Congress the American economist Wayne M Morrison mentions
ldquoChina continues to ldquomanipulaterdquo its currency in order to give its exporters an unfair trade
advantagerdquo4 An adjustment of their currency would disable the Chinese from keeping their
exports at the current level The increasing exports have earned China the title of the worldrsquos
largest exporter5 and are essential for their economic growth Decreasing exports would
affect the growth rate which then would threaten the countryrsquos stability This shows how the
fear of instability impacts the Chinese decision-making and thereby the present capitalist
environment
Furthermore the influence the growing regional disparity has on the governmentsrsquo decision-
making are another evidence that proves the valuation of stability ldquoBetween 1990 and 2005
Chinarsquos Gini coefficient rose from 0257 to 0447rdquo6 seriously endangering the social stability
in China However as ldquothe countryrsquos phenomenal growth and increasing global heft are
based on a steady [hellip] transition to capitalismrdquo7 and a slowdown or even stagnation of the
countryrsquos growth rate would mean an even greater threat for the countryrsquos stability ldquothe
Communist Party was not willing to slow down growth to address inequality or to leave the
balance purely to market forcesrdquo8 This shows again the huge interest the CPC and the
Peoplersquos Republic of China has in the countryrsquos stability and how it influences important
political decision-making The current growth rate is to a great extend caused by the
capitalist reforms and the slow liberalisation of the Chinese economy This process of
transition will stop at some point though The Chinese are aware that they find themselves in
times of transition and the current growth rate will not last forever which is why Chinarsquos
president promised at the National Peoplersquos Congress (NPC) to ldquofocus more on sustainable
development than rapid economic growthrdquo9
Although the Communist Party China builds up a Chinese capitalism upon a communist
system and embeds many capitalist characteristics in it the state still intervenes a lot to
regulate and control the market The CPC is extremely focussed on keeping the role of the
directive actor They give the pace of moving from a plan economy towards a market-based
economy and the only liberalise the economy to the degree they think is best The state- 4 httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
5 httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-
1864052html 23092011 6 httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
7 httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
8httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Chara
cteristicspdf p14 20092011 9 httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
10 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
owned enterprises that emerged under Maorsquos communist regime and that were characterized
as inefficient over-staffed and not profit-driven have become more efficient less indebted
and through implementation of managers much more profit-driven Nevertheless just as
back at Maorsquos times the CPC uses them as state tools to keep the economy on track
Despite the fact that China has still a lot of government intervention they achieved to enter
the WTO in 200110The entry in the WTO was a push towards more liberalization With the
entry in the WTO China clearly signalised their global orientation and adapting to
international agreements signalised the increasingly important role China is going to play in
the global economy Joining the WTO and adapting to the international rules of exchange
China is facing the global competition now much more than before and the CPC has had to
engage privatization of the SOEs to increase their competitiveness so that the Chinese
economy has been able to maintain their extraordinary growth rate
The present Chinese capitalist environment is very difficult to place on the McCrawrsquos scale of
government intervention On the one hand China is still a communist one-party state
governed by a party which intervenes in the economy to regulate and control the market
According to these facts thorough state management guides China and the state has the
power of decision-making for the whole economy which would mean the Chinese capitalism
had to be placed on the scale at degree 4 However on the other hand the CPC has
dropped most of their communist ideals and keeps transmitting the country by various
reforms into a market-based capitalism Presently the Chinese capitalism fulfils most of the
criteria that characterize capitalism such as labour as a commodity private property a
financial system and a currency The government promotes privatization and makes itself
dependant of international laws which is clear evidence for a decrease in government
intervention The transition towards a common market for example through a reform in the
banking sector which is likely to occur soon keeps moving the Chinese economy towards
capitalism with a systematic state guidance of private decision-making McCrawrsquos degree
number 3 Nevertheless the degree of liberalization is still under complete control of the
CPC and the economy is only as free as the party intends it to be Theoretically the
Communist Party China could rapidly decrease the degree to which the economy is
liberalized change laws and abolish the law that allows for example the property rights
which ensure a capitalist economy This is of course not very likely to happen but it is
important to point out that the whole Chinese capitalist system originates from the
governmentrsquos reforms and guidance Although these reforms have been pushed through and
the Chinese capitalism is more and more liberalized and taken towards a free market-based
10
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
Lenovo 26092011
11 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
economy political freedom is still not given and probably will not be in the close future which
is why China is currently placed on the McCrawrsquos scale of government intervention between
degree 4 and 3 Due to decreasing government intervention it is moving towards degree 3
though Without political freedom which would guarantee economic freedom property rights
and allow competition of law the Chinese capitalism cannot move any further than degree 3
on McCrawrsquos scale
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative
reponses
Introduction
There are many reasons why Lenovo has become one of the most dominant market leaders
in China as well as in the rest of the world One of the most important events in the Lenovorsquos
corporate history was the acquisition of the IBM personal Computing Division in 2005 which
enabled the company to become a competitive computer manufacture both domestically and
internationally Furthermore throughout Lenovorsquos history the state has been a major
stockholder in the company ndash and like other Chinese State supported enterprises ndash the
Chinese government has supported and protected Lenovo by indirect subsidiaries and
policies which made Lenovo capable of maintaining its dominance When analyzing how
Lenovo managed to develop its organization in a nation that has been marked by serious
economic and politic instability it is important to understand the entrepreneurial spirit that
has driven the company throughout its history Innovation and technological development
have been the core factors that contributed to the strong positioning of the Lenovo Group
Limited as being one of the pioneers in the global computer industry These different
strategic initiatives are somehow all exemplifies for different responses that Lenovo has
made in order survive the demanding IT-industry which is strongly affected by both the
globalization and liberalization of the Chinese market along with the very special type of
capitalism that characterizes the Chinese economy
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer
To start with Lenovo was owned by Legend Holdings Limited until 1994 when it was listed
on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong11 In March 2011 57 of Lenovo was owned by
public shareholders 42 by Legend Holdings Ltd and 1 by the directors12 The
11
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_cid=72 2009-11 12
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
Lenovo 26092011
12 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companyrsquos previous state ownership has implicitly contributed to Lenovorsquos success given the
advantage Lenovo has gained in the domestic market due to the one party-system that has
favoured strong domestic enterprises Although the Chinese government targeted the PC
industry as a national priority in the 1980rsquos Lenovo was not among those companies
selected by the government to be nurtured as the foundation of Chinarsquos future PC industry
Therefore Lenovo was not a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) in its true sense given that it
did not directly receive state support eg Lenovo did not receive a licence to produce PCs
until 199113 Despite the fact that Lenovo was not considered an ldquoordinaryrdquo SOE it still relied
on its parentrsquos the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) labs for the Research and
Development which it could use free of charge Lenovorsquos first production was developed at
ICT whom also facilitated Lenovorsquos first production experience by loaning their personnel
during the process ICT with its links to the government through the CAS supported Lenovo
in its early survival and thus the Chinese state played a significant role in the companyrsquos
early maintenance and growth
As Lenovo made its first Personal Computer under its own brand name in 1991 the
company suddenly became more important in the eyes of the government In 1994 the
company was celebrating its one millionth PC built14 In the same year it was revealed that
domestic computer companies such as Lenovo were going to be protected under a new
policy which was announced by the Chinese ministry of Electronics Lenovo was included in
Chinas ninth Five Year Plan - from 1996 to 2000 - as a key entity to be supported by
government policies15 During the ninth Five Year Plan China invested over $12 billion in the
909 Project which is the most expensive government effort for developing an advanced
semiconductor industry in China16 As a result of the government intervention Lenovo also
received an amount of the subsidy and eventually became the Chinese market leader in
1997 even surpassing IBM The latter was one of the main reasons for IBM to sell its PC
division to Lenovo The fact that Lenovo was able to grow with the indirect support of the
Chinese government reflects the special kind of capitalism that exist in the Chinese
economy Lenovo was operating on a free global market and at the same time enjoying the
beneficial protectionism and subsidies provided by the communist government The
13
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 2109-11 14
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 21092011
16 httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p169033-
19php page 19 21092011
Lenovo 26092011
13 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
legislation also provided the legal framework that would eventually make the acquisition of
IBM possible The law stated that foreign companies who wanted access to China could
only do so by cooperating with a Chinese company This rule was implemented so ensure
that Chinese companies gained eg know-how on technology
Lenovorsquos success started gradually in 1987 when the company expanded its activities to
distribution first for AST (the leading foreign brand in China at that time) and later adding
Hewlett-Packard Toshiba and IBM to its list17 Chuanzh the former CEO even went to the
extent of saying that ldquoOur earliest and best teacher was Hewlett-Packerrdquo18 What Chuanzh
wanted to empathize was that multinational companies such as HP were not only a source of
revenue for Lenovo but also a source of learning By distributing foreign-made PCs Lenovo
learned how to organize sales channels and merchandise PCs on a competitive market
Thus Lenovo began to comprehend its Chinese customers and the PC purchasing habits
making this a key for its dominance in the market for the upcoming years
The demand for computer technology became pervasive during the Third Industrial
Revolution which naturally benefited all computer manufactures around the world A lot of
Chinese industries had not yet reached the industrialization level of the western world
however the IT-industry is an exception The Chinese IT-industry plays a great part in the
Third Industrial Revolution where the immense increase in volume of international trade
investment and finance frequently has been centred in China In addition one could
therefore argue that Lenovo came on the right time with its first PC in 1991 in the exact same
period of history where demand for computer technology increased explaining its enormous
success both in the domestic and international market Lenovo already had a wide network
of distributors at that time and gained great insight in the Chinese consumption pattern
which gave them a huge advantage compared to their strongest competitors Thus it is
necessary to stress the importance of the Third Industrial Revolution as it created a market
Lenovo knew how to profit from by using its competitive advantages
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive
The various Schumpeterian responses that have been made in Lenovorsquos corporate history
enable us to explain how Lenovo became one of the market leaders in the IT-industry The
17
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 19092011 18
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
9 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
report for the American Congress the American economist Wayne M Morrison mentions
ldquoChina continues to ldquomanipulaterdquo its currency in order to give its exporters an unfair trade
advantagerdquo4 An adjustment of their currency would disable the Chinese from keeping their
exports at the current level The increasing exports have earned China the title of the worldrsquos
largest exporter5 and are essential for their economic growth Decreasing exports would
affect the growth rate which then would threaten the countryrsquos stability This shows how the
fear of instability impacts the Chinese decision-making and thereby the present capitalist
environment
Furthermore the influence the growing regional disparity has on the governmentsrsquo decision-
making are another evidence that proves the valuation of stability ldquoBetween 1990 and 2005
Chinarsquos Gini coefficient rose from 0257 to 0447rdquo6 seriously endangering the social stability
in China However as ldquothe countryrsquos phenomenal growth and increasing global heft are
based on a steady [hellip] transition to capitalismrdquo7 and a slowdown or even stagnation of the
countryrsquos growth rate would mean an even greater threat for the countryrsquos stability ldquothe
Communist Party was not willing to slow down growth to address inequality or to leave the
balance purely to market forcesrdquo8 This shows again the huge interest the CPC and the
Peoplersquos Republic of China has in the countryrsquos stability and how it influences important
political decision-making The current growth rate is to a great extend caused by the
capitalist reforms and the slow liberalisation of the Chinese economy This process of
transition will stop at some point though The Chinese are aware that they find themselves in
times of transition and the current growth rate will not last forever which is why Chinarsquos
president promised at the National Peoplersquos Congress (NPC) to ldquofocus more on sustainable
development than rapid economic growthrdquo9
Although the Communist Party China builds up a Chinese capitalism upon a communist
system and embeds many capitalist characteristics in it the state still intervenes a lot to
regulate and control the market The CPC is extremely focussed on keeping the role of the
directive actor They give the pace of moving from a plan economy towards a market-based
economy and the only liberalise the economy to the degree they think is best The state- 4 httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
5 httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-
1864052html 23092011 6 httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
7 httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
8httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Chara
cteristicspdf p14 20092011 9 httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
Lenovo 26092011
10 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
owned enterprises that emerged under Maorsquos communist regime and that were characterized
as inefficient over-staffed and not profit-driven have become more efficient less indebted
and through implementation of managers much more profit-driven Nevertheless just as
back at Maorsquos times the CPC uses them as state tools to keep the economy on track
Despite the fact that China has still a lot of government intervention they achieved to enter
the WTO in 200110The entry in the WTO was a push towards more liberalization With the
entry in the WTO China clearly signalised their global orientation and adapting to
international agreements signalised the increasingly important role China is going to play in
the global economy Joining the WTO and adapting to the international rules of exchange
China is facing the global competition now much more than before and the CPC has had to
engage privatization of the SOEs to increase their competitiveness so that the Chinese
economy has been able to maintain their extraordinary growth rate
The present Chinese capitalist environment is very difficult to place on the McCrawrsquos scale of
government intervention On the one hand China is still a communist one-party state
governed by a party which intervenes in the economy to regulate and control the market
According to these facts thorough state management guides China and the state has the
power of decision-making for the whole economy which would mean the Chinese capitalism
had to be placed on the scale at degree 4 However on the other hand the CPC has
dropped most of their communist ideals and keeps transmitting the country by various
reforms into a market-based capitalism Presently the Chinese capitalism fulfils most of the
criteria that characterize capitalism such as labour as a commodity private property a
financial system and a currency The government promotes privatization and makes itself
dependant of international laws which is clear evidence for a decrease in government
intervention The transition towards a common market for example through a reform in the
banking sector which is likely to occur soon keeps moving the Chinese economy towards
capitalism with a systematic state guidance of private decision-making McCrawrsquos degree
number 3 Nevertheless the degree of liberalization is still under complete control of the
CPC and the economy is only as free as the party intends it to be Theoretically the
Communist Party China could rapidly decrease the degree to which the economy is
liberalized change laws and abolish the law that allows for example the property rights
which ensure a capitalist economy This is of course not very likely to happen but it is
important to point out that the whole Chinese capitalist system originates from the
governmentrsquos reforms and guidance Although these reforms have been pushed through and
the Chinese capitalism is more and more liberalized and taken towards a free market-based
10
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
Lenovo 26092011
11 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
economy political freedom is still not given and probably will not be in the close future which
is why China is currently placed on the McCrawrsquos scale of government intervention between
degree 4 and 3 Due to decreasing government intervention it is moving towards degree 3
though Without political freedom which would guarantee economic freedom property rights
and allow competition of law the Chinese capitalism cannot move any further than degree 3
on McCrawrsquos scale
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative
reponses
Introduction
There are many reasons why Lenovo has become one of the most dominant market leaders
in China as well as in the rest of the world One of the most important events in the Lenovorsquos
corporate history was the acquisition of the IBM personal Computing Division in 2005 which
enabled the company to become a competitive computer manufacture both domestically and
internationally Furthermore throughout Lenovorsquos history the state has been a major
stockholder in the company ndash and like other Chinese State supported enterprises ndash the
Chinese government has supported and protected Lenovo by indirect subsidiaries and
policies which made Lenovo capable of maintaining its dominance When analyzing how
Lenovo managed to develop its organization in a nation that has been marked by serious
economic and politic instability it is important to understand the entrepreneurial spirit that
has driven the company throughout its history Innovation and technological development
have been the core factors that contributed to the strong positioning of the Lenovo Group
Limited as being one of the pioneers in the global computer industry These different
strategic initiatives are somehow all exemplifies for different responses that Lenovo has
made in order survive the demanding IT-industry which is strongly affected by both the
globalization and liberalization of the Chinese market along with the very special type of
capitalism that characterizes the Chinese economy
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer
To start with Lenovo was owned by Legend Holdings Limited until 1994 when it was listed
on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong11 In March 2011 57 of Lenovo was owned by
public shareholders 42 by Legend Holdings Ltd and 1 by the directors12 The
11
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_cid=72 2009-11 12
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
Lenovo 26092011
12 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companyrsquos previous state ownership has implicitly contributed to Lenovorsquos success given the
advantage Lenovo has gained in the domestic market due to the one party-system that has
favoured strong domestic enterprises Although the Chinese government targeted the PC
industry as a national priority in the 1980rsquos Lenovo was not among those companies
selected by the government to be nurtured as the foundation of Chinarsquos future PC industry
Therefore Lenovo was not a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) in its true sense given that it
did not directly receive state support eg Lenovo did not receive a licence to produce PCs
until 199113 Despite the fact that Lenovo was not considered an ldquoordinaryrdquo SOE it still relied
on its parentrsquos the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) labs for the Research and
Development which it could use free of charge Lenovorsquos first production was developed at
ICT whom also facilitated Lenovorsquos first production experience by loaning their personnel
during the process ICT with its links to the government through the CAS supported Lenovo
in its early survival and thus the Chinese state played a significant role in the companyrsquos
early maintenance and growth
As Lenovo made its first Personal Computer under its own brand name in 1991 the
company suddenly became more important in the eyes of the government In 1994 the
company was celebrating its one millionth PC built14 In the same year it was revealed that
domestic computer companies such as Lenovo were going to be protected under a new
policy which was announced by the Chinese ministry of Electronics Lenovo was included in
Chinas ninth Five Year Plan - from 1996 to 2000 - as a key entity to be supported by
government policies15 During the ninth Five Year Plan China invested over $12 billion in the
909 Project which is the most expensive government effort for developing an advanced
semiconductor industry in China16 As a result of the government intervention Lenovo also
received an amount of the subsidy and eventually became the Chinese market leader in
1997 even surpassing IBM The latter was one of the main reasons for IBM to sell its PC
division to Lenovo The fact that Lenovo was able to grow with the indirect support of the
Chinese government reflects the special kind of capitalism that exist in the Chinese
economy Lenovo was operating on a free global market and at the same time enjoying the
beneficial protectionism and subsidies provided by the communist government The
13
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 2109-11 14
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 21092011
16 httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p169033-
19php page 19 21092011
Lenovo 26092011
13 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
legislation also provided the legal framework that would eventually make the acquisition of
IBM possible The law stated that foreign companies who wanted access to China could
only do so by cooperating with a Chinese company This rule was implemented so ensure
that Chinese companies gained eg know-how on technology
Lenovorsquos success started gradually in 1987 when the company expanded its activities to
distribution first for AST (the leading foreign brand in China at that time) and later adding
Hewlett-Packard Toshiba and IBM to its list17 Chuanzh the former CEO even went to the
extent of saying that ldquoOur earliest and best teacher was Hewlett-Packerrdquo18 What Chuanzh
wanted to empathize was that multinational companies such as HP were not only a source of
revenue for Lenovo but also a source of learning By distributing foreign-made PCs Lenovo
learned how to organize sales channels and merchandise PCs on a competitive market
Thus Lenovo began to comprehend its Chinese customers and the PC purchasing habits
making this a key for its dominance in the market for the upcoming years
The demand for computer technology became pervasive during the Third Industrial
Revolution which naturally benefited all computer manufactures around the world A lot of
Chinese industries had not yet reached the industrialization level of the western world
however the IT-industry is an exception The Chinese IT-industry plays a great part in the
Third Industrial Revolution where the immense increase in volume of international trade
investment and finance frequently has been centred in China In addition one could
therefore argue that Lenovo came on the right time with its first PC in 1991 in the exact same
period of history where demand for computer technology increased explaining its enormous
success both in the domestic and international market Lenovo already had a wide network
of distributors at that time and gained great insight in the Chinese consumption pattern
which gave them a huge advantage compared to their strongest competitors Thus it is
necessary to stress the importance of the Third Industrial Revolution as it created a market
Lenovo knew how to profit from by using its competitive advantages
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive
The various Schumpeterian responses that have been made in Lenovorsquos corporate history
enable us to explain how Lenovo became one of the market leaders in the IT-industry The
17
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 19092011 18
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
10 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
owned enterprises that emerged under Maorsquos communist regime and that were characterized
as inefficient over-staffed and not profit-driven have become more efficient less indebted
and through implementation of managers much more profit-driven Nevertheless just as
back at Maorsquos times the CPC uses them as state tools to keep the economy on track
Despite the fact that China has still a lot of government intervention they achieved to enter
the WTO in 200110The entry in the WTO was a push towards more liberalization With the
entry in the WTO China clearly signalised their global orientation and adapting to
international agreements signalised the increasingly important role China is going to play in
the global economy Joining the WTO and adapting to the international rules of exchange
China is facing the global competition now much more than before and the CPC has had to
engage privatization of the SOEs to increase their competitiveness so that the Chinese
economy has been able to maintain their extraordinary growth rate
The present Chinese capitalist environment is very difficult to place on the McCrawrsquos scale of
government intervention On the one hand China is still a communist one-party state
governed by a party which intervenes in the economy to regulate and control the market
According to these facts thorough state management guides China and the state has the
power of decision-making for the whole economy which would mean the Chinese capitalism
had to be placed on the scale at degree 4 However on the other hand the CPC has
dropped most of their communist ideals and keeps transmitting the country by various
reforms into a market-based capitalism Presently the Chinese capitalism fulfils most of the
criteria that characterize capitalism such as labour as a commodity private property a
financial system and a currency The government promotes privatization and makes itself
dependant of international laws which is clear evidence for a decrease in government
intervention The transition towards a common market for example through a reform in the
banking sector which is likely to occur soon keeps moving the Chinese economy towards
capitalism with a systematic state guidance of private decision-making McCrawrsquos degree
number 3 Nevertheless the degree of liberalization is still under complete control of the
CPC and the economy is only as free as the party intends it to be Theoretically the
Communist Party China could rapidly decrease the degree to which the economy is
liberalized change laws and abolish the law that allows for example the property rights
which ensure a capitalist economy This is of course not very likely to happen but it is
important to point out that the whole Chinese capitalist system originates from the
governmentrsquos reforms and guidance Although these reforms have been pushed through and
the Chinese capitalism is more and more liberalized and taken towards a free market-based
10
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
Lenovo 26092011
11 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
economy political freedom is still not given and probably will not be in the close future which
is why China is currently placed on the McCrawrsquos scale of government intervention between
degree 4 and 3 Due to decreasing government intervention it is moving towards degree 3
though Without political freedom which would guarantee economic freedom property rights
and allow competition of law the Chinese capitalism cannot move any further than degree 3
on McCrawrsquos scale
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative
reponses
Introduction
There are many reasons why Lenovo has become one of the most dominant market leaders
in China as well as in the rest of the world One of the most important events in the Lenovorsquos
corporate history was the acquisition of the IBM personal Computing Division in 2005 which
enabled the company to become a competitive computer manufacture both domestically and
internationally Furthermore throughout Lenovorsquos history the state has been a major
stockholder in the company ndash and like other Chinese State supported enterprises ndash the
Chinese government has supported and protected Lenovo by indirect subsidiaries and
policies which made Lenovo capable of maintaining its dominance When analyzing how
Lenovo managed to develop its organization in a nation that has been marked by serious
economic and politic instability it is important to understand the entrepreneurial spirit that
has driven the company throughout its history Innovation and technological development
have been the core factors that contributed to the strong positioning of the Lenovo Group
Limited as being one of the pioneers in the global computer industry These different
strategic initiatives are somehow all exemplifies for different responses that Lenovo has
made in order survive the demanding IT-industry which is strongly affected by both the
globalization and liberalization of the Chinese market along with the very special type of
capitalism that characterizes the Chinese economy
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer
To start with Lenovo was owned by Legend Holdings Limited until 1994 when it was listed
on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong11 In March 2011 57 of Lenovo was owned by
public shareholders 42 by Legend Holdings Ltd and 1 by the directors12 The
11
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_cid=72 2009-11 12
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
Lenovo 26092011
12 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companyrsquos previous state ownership has implicitly contributed to Lenovorsquos success given the
advantage Lenovo has gained in the domestic market due to the one party-system that has
favoured strong domestic enterprises Although the Chinese government targeted the PC
industry as a national priority in the 1980rsquos Lenovo was not among those companies
selected by the government to be nurtured as the foundation of Chinarsquos future PC industry
Therefore Lenovo was not a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) in its true sense given that it
did not directly receive state support eg Lenovo did not receive a licence to produce PCs
until 199113 Despite the fact that Lenovo was not considered an ldquoordinaryrdquo SOE it still relied
on its parentrsquos the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) labs for the Research and
Development which it could use free of charge Lenovorsquos first production was developed at
ICT whom also facilitated Lenovorsquos first production experience by loaning their personnel
during the process ICT with its links to the government through the CAS supported Lenovo
in its early survival and thus the Chinese state played a significant role in the companyrsquos
early maintenance and growth
As Lenovo made its first Personal Computer under its own brand name in 1991 the
company suddenly became more important in the eyes of the government In 1994 the
company was celebrating its one millionth PC built14 In the same year it was revealed that
domestic computer companies such as Lenovo were going to be protected under a new
policy which was announced by the Chinese ministry of Electronics Lenovo was included in
Chinas ninth Five Year Plan - from 1996 to 2000 - as a key entity to be supported by
government policies15 During the ninth Five Year Plan China invested over $12 billion in the
909 Project which is the most expensive government effort for developing an advanced
semiconductor industry in China16 As a result of the government intervention Lenovo also
received an amount of the subsidy and eventually became the Chinese market leader in
1997 even surpassing IBM The latter was one of the main reasons for IBM to sell its PC
division to Lenovo The fact that Lenovo was able to grow with the indirect support of the
Chinese government reflects the special kind of capitalism that exist in the Chinese
economy Lenovo was operating on a free global market and at the same time enjoying the
beneficial protectionism and subsidies provided by the communist government The
13
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 2109-11 14
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 21092011
16 httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p169033-
19php page 19 21092011
Lenovo 26092011
13 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
legislation also provided the legal framework that would eventually make the acquisition of
IBM possible The law stated that foreign companies who wanted access to China could
only do so by cooperating with a Chinese company This rule was implemented so ensure
that Chinese companies gained eg know-how on technology
Lenovorsquos success started gradually in 1987 when the company expanded its activities to
distribution first for AST (the leading foreign brand in China at that time) and later adding
Hewlett-Packard Toshiba and IBM to its list17 Chuanzh the former CEO even went to the
extent of saying that ldquoOur earliest and best teacher was Hewlett-Packerrdquo18 What Chuanzh
wanted to empathize was that multinational companies such as HP were not only a source of
revenue for Lenovo but also a source of learning By distributing foreign-made PCs Lenovo
learned how to organize sales channels and merchandise PCs on a competitive market
Thus Lenovo began to comprehend its Chinese customers and the PC purchasing habits
making this a key for its dominance in the market for the upcoming years
The demand for computer technology became pervasive during the Third Industrial
Revolution which naturally benefited all computer manufactures around the world A lot of
Chinese industries had not yet reached the industrialization level of the western world
however the IT-industry is an exception The Chinese IT-industry plays a great part in the
Third Industrial Revolution where the immense increase in volume of international trade
investment and finance frequently has been centred in China In addition one could
therefore argue that Lenovo came on the right time with its first PC in 1991 in the exact same
period of history where demand for computer technology increased explaining its enormous
success both in the domestic and international market Lenovo already had a wide network
of distributors at that time and gained great insight in the Chinese consumption pattern
which gave them a huge advantage compared to their strongest competitors Thus it is
necessary to stress the importance of the Third Industrial Revolution as it created a market
Lenovo knew how to profit from by using its competitive advantages
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive
The various Schumpeterian responses that have been made in Lenovorsquos corporate history
enable us to explain how Lenovo became one of the market leaders in the IT-industry The
17
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 19092011 18
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
11 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
economy political freedom is still not given and probably will not be in the close future which
is why China is currently placed on the McCrawrsquos scale of government intervention between
degree 4 and 3 Due to decreasing government intervention it is moving towards degree 3
though Without political freedom which would guarantee economic freedom property rights
and allow competition of law the Chinese capitalism cannot move any further than degree 3
on McCrawrsquos scale
Lenovo ndash into a market leader through adaptive and creative
reponses
Introduction
There are many reasons why Lenovo has become one of the most dominant market leaders
in China as well as in the rest of the world One of the most important events in the Lenovorsquos
corporate history was the acquisition of the IBM personal Computing Division in 2005 which
enabled the company to become a competitive computer manufacture both domestically and
internationally Furthermore throughout Lenovorsquos history the state has been a major
stockholder in the company ndash and like other Chinese State supported enterprises ndash the
Chinese government has supported and protected Lenovo by indirect subsidiaries and
policies which made Lenovo capable of maintaining its dominance When analyzing how
Lenovo managed to develop its organization in a nation that has been marked by serious
economic and politic instability it is important to understand the entrepreneurial spirit that
has driven the company throughout its history Innovation and technological development
have been the core factors that contributed to the strong positioning of the Lenovo Group
Limited as being one of the pioneers in the global computer industry These different
strategic initiatives are somehow all exemplifies for different responses that Lenovo has
made in order survive the demanding IT-industry which is strongly affected by both the
globalization and liberalization of the Chinese market along with the very special type of
capitalism that characterizes the Chinese economy
From domestic distributor to global manufacturer
To start with Lenovo was owned by Legend Holdings Limited until 1994 when it was listed
on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong11 In March 2011 57 of Lenovo was owned by
public shareholders 42 by Legend Holdings Ltd and 1 by the directors12 The
11
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_cid=72 2009-11 12
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
Lenovo 26092011
12 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companyrsquos previous state ownership has implicitly contributed to Lenovorsquos success given the
advantage Lenovo has gained in the domestic market due to the one party-system that has
favoured strong domestic enterprises Although the Chinese government targeted the PC
industry as a national priority in the 1980rsquos Lenovo was not among those companies
selected by the government to be nurtured as the foundation of Chinarsquos future PC industry
Therefore Lenovo was not a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) in its true sense given that it
did not directly receive state support eg Lenovo did not receive a licence to produce PCs
until 199113 Despite the fact that Lenovo was not considered an ldquoordinaryrdquo SOE it still relied
on its parentrsquos the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) labs for the Research and
Development which it could use free of charge Lenovorsquos first production was developed at
ICT whom also facilitated Lenovorsquos first production experience by loaning their personnel
during the process ICT with its links to the government through the CAS supported Lenovo
in its early survival and thus the Chinese state played a significant role in the companyrsquos
early maintenance and growth
As Lenovo made its first Personal Computer under its own brand name in 1991 the
company suddenly became more important in the eyes of the government In 1994 the
company was celebrating its one millionth PC built14 In the same year it was revealed that
domestic computer companies such as Lenovo were going to be protected under a new
policy which was announced by the Chinese ministry of Electronics Lenovo was included in
Chinas ninth Five Year Plan - from 1996 to 2000 - as a key entity to be supported by
government policies15 During the ninth Five Year Plan China invested over $12 billion in the
909 Project which is the most expensive government effort for developing an advanced
semiconductor industry in China16 As a result of the government intervention Lenovo also
received an amount of the subsidy and eventually became the Chinese market leader in
1997 even surpassing IBM The latter was one of the main reasons for IBM to sell its PC
division to Lenovo The fact that Lenovo was able to grow with the indirect support of the
Chinese government reflects the special kind of capitalism that exist in the Chinese
economy Lenovo was operating on a free global market and at the same time enjoying the
beneficial protectionism and subsidies provided by the communist government The
13
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 2109-11 14
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 21092011
16 httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p169033-
19php page 19 21092011
Lenovo 26092011
13 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
legislation also provided the legal framework that would eventually make the acquisition of
IBM possible The law stated that foreign companies who wanted access to China could
only do so by cooperating with a Chinese company This rule was implemented so ensure
that Chinese companies gained eg know-how on technology
Lenovorsquos success started gradually in 1987 when the company expanded its activities to
distribution first for AST (the leading foreign brand in China at that time) and later adding
Hewlett-Packard Toshiba and IBM to its list17 Chuanzh the former CEO even went to the
extent of saying that ldquoOur earliest and best teacher was Hewlett-Packerrdquo18 What Chuanzh
wanted to empathize was that multinational companies such as HP were not only a source of
revenue for Lenovo but also a source of learning By distributing foreign-made PCs Lenovo
learned how to organize sales channels and merchandise PCs on a competitive market
Thus Lenovo began to comprehend its Chinese customers and the PC purchasing habits
making this a key for its dominance in the market for the upcoming years
The demand for computer technology became pervasive during the Third Industrial
Revolution which naturally benefited all computer manufactures around the world A lot of
Chinese industries had not yet reached the industrialization level of the western world
however the IT-industry is an exception The Chinese IT-industry plays a great part in the
Third Industrial Revolution where the immense increase in volume of international trade
investment and finance frequently has been centred in China In addition one could
therefore argue that Lenovo came on the right time with its first PC in 1991 in the exact same
period of history where demand for computer technology increased explaining its enormous
success both in the domestic and international market Lenovo already had a wide network
of distributors at that time and gained great insight in the Chinese consumption pattern
which gave them a huge advantage compared to their strongest competitors Thus it is
necessary to stress the importance of the Third Industrial Revolution as it created a market
Lenovo knew how to profit from by using its competitive advantages
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive
The various Schumpeterian responses that have been made in Lenovorsquos corporate history
enable us to explain how Lenovo became one of the market leaders in the IT-industry The
17
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 19092011 18
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
12 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companyrsquos previous state ownership has implicitly contributed to Lenovorsquos success given the
advantage Lenovo has gained in the domestic market due to the one party-system that has
favoured strong domestic enterprises Although the Chinese government targeted the PC
industry as a national priority in the 1980rsquos Lenovo was not among those companies
selected by the government to be nurtured as the foundation of Chinarsquos future PC industry
Therefore Lenovo was not a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) in its true sense given that it
did not directly receive state support eg Lenovo did not receive a licence to produce PCs
until 199113 Despite the fact that Lenovo was not considered an ldquoordinaryrdquo SOE it still relied
on its parentrsquos the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) labs for the Research and
Development which it could use free of charge Lenovorsquos first production was developed at
ICT whom also facilitated Lenovorsquos first production experience by loaning their personnel
during the process ICT with its links to the government through the CAS supported Lenovo
in its early survival and thus the Chinese state played a significant role in the companyrsquos
early maintenance and growth
As Lenovo made its first Personal Computer under its own brand name in 1991 the
company suddenly became more important in the eyes of the government In 1994 the
company was celebrating its one millionth PC built14 In the same year it was revealed that
domestic computer companies such as Lenovo were going to be protected under a new
policy which was announced by the Chinese ministry of Electronics Lenovo was included in
Chinas ninth Five Year Plan - from 1996 to 2000 - as a key entity to be supported by
government policies15 During the ninth Five Year Plan China invested over $12 billion in the
909 Project which is the most expensive government effort for developing an advanced
semiconductor industry in China16 As a result of the government intervention Lenovo also
received an amount of the subsidy and eventually became the Chinese market leader in
1997 even surpassing IBM The latter was one of the main reasons for IBM to sell its PC
division to Lenovo The fact that Lenovo was able to grow with the indirect support of the
Chinese government reflects the special kind of capitalism that exist in the Chinese
economy Lenovo was operating on a free global market and at the same time enjoying the
beneficial protectionism and subsidies provided by the communist government The
13
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 2109-11 14
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 21092011
16 httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p169033-
19php page 19 21092011
Lenovo 26092011
13 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
legislation also provided the legal framework that would eventually make the acquisition of
IBM possible The law stated that foreign companies who wanted access to China could
only do so by cooperating with a Chinese company This rule was implemented so ensure
that Chinese companies gained eg know-how on technology
Lenovorsquos success started gradually in 1987 when the company expanded its activities to
distribution first for AST (the leading foreign brand in China at that time) and later adding
Hewlett-Packard Toshiba and IBM to its list17 Chuanzh the former CEO even went to the
extent of saying that ldquoOur earliest and best teacher was Hewlett-Packerrdquo18 What Chuanzh
wanted to empathize was that multinational companies such as HP were not only a source of
revenue for Lenovo but also a source of learning By distributing foreign-made PCs Lenovo
learned how to organize sales channels and merchandise PCs on a competitive market
Thus Lenovo began to comprehend its Chinese customers and the PC purchasing habits
making this a key for its dominance in the market for the upcoming years
The demand for computer technology became pervasive during the Third Industrial
Revolution which naturally benefited all computer manufactures around the world A lot of
Chinese industries had not yet reached the industrialization level of the western world
however the IT-industry is an exception The Chinese IT-industry plays a great part in the
Third Industrial Revolution where the immense increase in volume of international trade
investment and finance frequently has been centred in China In addition one could
therefore argue that Lenovo came on the right time with its first PC in 1991 in the exact same
period of history where demand for computer technology increased explaining its enormous
success both in the domestic and international market Lenovo already had a wide network
of distributors at that time and gained great insight in the Chinese consumption pattern
which gave them a huge advantage compared to their strongest competitors Thus it is
necessary to stress the importance of the Third Industrial Revolution as it created a market
Lenovo knew how to profit from by using its competitive advantages
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive
The various Schumpeterian responses that have been made in Lenovorsquos corporate history
enable us to explain how Lenovo became one of the market leaders in the IT-industry The
17
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 19092011 18
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
13 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
legislation also provided the legal framework that would eventually make the acquisition of
IBM possible The law stated that foreign companies who wanted access to China could
only do so by cooperating with a Chinese company This rule was implemented so ensure
that Chinese companies gained eg know-how on technology
Lenovorsquos success started gradually in 1987 when the company expanded its activities to
distribution first for AST (the leading foreign brand in China at that time) and later adding
Hewlett-Packard Toshiba and IBM to its list17 Chuanzh the former CEO even went to the
extent of saying that ldquoOur earliest and best teacher was Hewlett-Packerrdquo18 What Chuanzh
wanted to empathize was that multinational companies such as HP were not only a source of
revenue for Lenovo but also a source of learning By distributing foreign-made PCs Lenovo
learned how to organize sales channels and merchandise PCs on a competitive market
Thus Lenovo began to comprehend its Chinese customers and the PC purchasing habits
making this a key for its dominance in the market for the upcoming years
The demand for computer technology became pervasive during the Third Industrial
Revolution which naturally benefited all computer manufactures around the world A lot of
Chinese industries had not yet reached the industrialization level of the western world
however the IT-industry is an exception The Chinese IT-industry plays a great part in the
Third Industrial Revolution where the immense increase in volume of international trade
investment and finance frequently has been centred in China In addition one could
therefore argue that Lenovo came on the right time with its first PC in 1991 in the exact same
period of history where demand for computer technology increased explaining its enormous
success both in the domestic and international market Lenovo already had a wide network
of distributors at that time and gained great insight in the Chinese consumption pattern
which gave them a huge advantage compared to their strongest competitors Thus it is
necessary to stress the importance of the Third Industrial Revolution as it created a market
Lenovo knew how to profit from by using its competitive advantages
Schumpeterian responses ndash creative and adaptive
The various Schumpeterian responses that have been made in Lenovorsquos corporate history
enable us to explain how Lenovo became one of the market leaders in the IT-industry The
17
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page 284 19092011 18
httpgogalegroupcomesc-weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
14 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo Group Limitedrsquos corporate history really exemplifies very well how Schumpeterrsquos
theory can be put into practice
Lenovo has in many ways been a pioneering brand which has played an important role in
the development of the global computer industry as we know it today Technological
development massive investment in RampD comprehensive channels of distribution
aggressive advertising increasing efficiency and economies of scale are some of the most
important characteristics describing Lenovorsquos history Some of these initiatives certainly
changed the computer industry while others were implemented in order to adapt to the
changing market conditions When Lenovo produced its first PC in 1991 and vertically
integrated new activities in their value chain they gained several second-mover advantages
from its close cooperation with IBM
In 1997 the Legend Group signed a landmark agreement with computer-giant Microsoft to
install Windows 95 in its products19 One could argue that this agreement in fact was a sign
of adaptive response as Microsoft were first-movers in the invention of computer operating
systems and by incorporating this popular product the Legend Group could add significant
value to their products The Chinese computer industry was not able to develop its own
computer software and was therefore encouraged to adapt the standards of operating
systems that had been invented in the United States By joining hands with the pioneering
Microsoft Corp the Legend Group could benefit from the second-mover advantages and
focus on their own strengths which primarily include the development and assembling of
Personal Computers
The fact that Lenovo distributed IBMrsquos and HPrsquos products on the Chinese market meant that
the company had both developed a valuable know-how and an effective channel of
distribution In many ways Lenovo had to adapt to the current computer industry where big
businesses like HP and IBM already had set the standards of computer manufacturing The
fact that IBM invented its first computer in 1981 meant that Lenovo could use a lot of the
knowledge from IBM they had gained before in their computer manufacture The adaptive
response that Lenovo had to make would eventually create several opportunities for the
company to influence the entire industry Thus their continuous cooperation with IBM
positioned them as a trustworthy brand and they benefited a lot from the goodwill that IBM
had among the Chinese consumers This cooperation culminated in December 2004 where
Lenovo announced that they had completed the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division for the
19
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
15 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
amount of $175 billion (including $500 million in assumed liabilities) (Quelch Knoop and
Carin 2006) IBM most likely saw this deal with Lenovo as an opportunity to create stronger
relations with the Chinese government from which they hoped to benefit from in the long-
term As part of the deal Lenovo gained the right to use the IBM logo on its products for five
years along with permanently acquiring the IBM ThinkPad and ThinkCenter desktop brands
20 In return Lenovo promised not to compete with IBMrsquos services and consulting groups
Moreover Lenovo also had access to IBMrsquos 30000-member enterprise sales team and on-
going support from partner and channel management programs in 138 countries (Quelch
Knoop and Carin 2006) The IBM brand was associated with great credibility and the fact that
Lenovorsquos products contained components manufactured by IBM was considered a great
addition of value among the consumers The acquisition also allowed Lenovo to expand its
global activities and with the sponsorship of the Olympics in both Turin and Beijing Lenovo
became extremely popular on the global market The public visibility that Lenovo achieved
through its advertising during the Olympics turned out to be very valuable in the attempt to
market their products world-wide Thus Lenovo managed to achieve a market share of 96
in Russia by the beginning of 2011
For Lenovo the acquisition of IBMs PC business meant the rise as a global player in a key
industry Lenovo was not a well-known brand outside Asia until this acquisition which
allowed the new enlarged company to build a new brand name using IBMrsquos legacy All this
together enabled the company to move quickly into the international marketplace making it a
reliable computer manufacture internationally Through IBM Lenovo gained access to the
worldwide PC market and their annual revenue quickly rose to more than $12 billion In
September 2005 the company underwent a management restructuring that integrated the
original Lenovo and former IBM organization Lenovorsquos top jobs went to executives around
the world resembling the companyrsquos new international composition and scope21
In order to distinguish Lenovorsquos success from its competitors it is important to acknowledge
the creative responses made by IBM which Lenovo could then further develop and imitate In
terms of creative response IBM introduced its pioneering ThinkPad product in 1992 which
was the first step towards several creative responses that would determine which elements
computers would contain in the future The first creative response was the integration of CD-
ROM drives in the ThinkPad the first time a PC manufacturer did so in a notebook This kind
of creative response without doubt changed the technological standards of computer
20 httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
16 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
manufacturers as every competitor now had to adapt to this new innovative response in
order to survive in the growing IT-industry The beginning of 2000 another new element was
integrated in the new ThinkPad I Series which was a built-in wireless network22 This was
truly a ground-breaking invention and once again changed the expectations among
consumers towards computer products Both the CD-ROM drive and the built-in wireless
network are now common components that consumers take for granted This might not have
been the case if IBM had not integrated these elements in their notebooks After the
acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division Lenovo experienced huge success in their continuous
development of their flagship the ThinkPad Thereby the ThinkPad provided Lenovo with
possible future responses Lenovo was now in charge of assembling the entire product and
developing new technologies Lenovo could then distribute the products under its own brand
with the option of using the IBM brand on the IBM Think-family products and in the overall
advertising as long as the two brand where not separated
The Chinese manufacture industry is well known for its ability to imitate existing products
which Lenovo is a great example for As already mentioned Lenovo imitated a lot of its
activities from IBM Whether imitation is entrepreneurial spirit must be discussed According
to Schumpeter the imitator is not a real entrepreneur as he does not cause economic
growth However Schumpeter misses to define a very important role the imitator plays in
terms of economic growth Producing a product does not create economic growth The
imitation of a certain product allows the market to grow and forces new innovation and
technology for the competitors to stay competitive Looking at Lenovo you can clearly see
how the company has evolved since its establishment by copying and buying otherrsquos ideas
and thereby growing to a market leader This example clearly shows that an imitator should
be considered as an entrepreneur as he is essential for economic growth
Lenovo made another creative response by analyzing the consumer market and
implementing segmentation into their production This creative response took the Chinese
computer industry from phase two in phase three according to the Three Phases of
Marketing The segmentation of the Chinese market was due to a very thorough and
comprehensive market research by Lenovo asking over 4000 customers face-to-face about
their preferences The Lenovo organization learned that consumers predicted decreased
innovation and quality while services and support would be outsourced overseas The
response to these challenges was to build up Lenovo as a strong master brand and at the
same time boost the ThinkPad product brand The number of product categories had to be
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
17 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
decided and they were two business models to follow The first model prioritized supply chain
efficiencies in order to create economies of scale which was commonly used by such
producers as Dell and Acer The other business model was the one that focused on selling
product innovation which was carried out by both IBM and Apple In order to differentiate its
products from competitors such as Apple Lenovo was endeavored to combine quality
innovation and efficiency in their products as they did not consider quality and cheap
production as contradictory The efficient network base in China together with a great global
infrastructure enabled Lenovo to add both values to their already well-reputed brand To
complete this strategy Lenovo was planning to launch new products along with a three
phase advertising plan From May to September 2005 the company ran a worldwide
advertising campaign with the agenda of maintaining the ThinkPadrsquos sales volume Lenovo
wanted to preserve its goodwill after the acquisition by ensuring that very little had changed
since they purchased the IBM PC division The second phase was part of the unique
sponsorship at the Olympics from which the Lenovo group had achieved a very significant
advertising platform At the Turin Olympics Opening Ceremony on February 10 2006
Lenovo ran a campaign with the headline ldquoThinkPad unleashedrdquo which was expected to
reach at least 27 million viewers The last phase of the advertising plan was based on the
concept of innovation as the company would take advantage of the strength of the ThinkPad
product and transfer its values to the superior Lenovo Brand If you look at the huge success
Lenovo has achieved by adapting and imitating the industry it is hard to question its strategic
decisions Being able to benefit from first-movers and having the strength and courage to
stimulate and develop your own strengths in order to achieve global success is without
doubt great entrepreneurial spirit although Schumpeter might disagree
Another example of adaptive response has recently occurred Liu Chuanzhi current CEO of
Lenovo revealed that the group was planning to include the assembling of smart phones into
their production process23 This is a move that has most likely been encouraged by the great
hype that the smart phones had provoked and in order to keep pace with the IT-industry
Lenovo has been either compelled or inspired to extend its assortment In any case this
product extension exemplifies how the technological development within the industry can
create incentives for companies to imitate first-moverrsquos creative responses Lenovo has
adapted to the growing market for smart phones by introducing smart phones in their
assembly line
23
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
18 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Chinese movement through various degrees
Since Xiaoping became the leader of the country in 1976 China has taken many steps
towards economic freedom which makes it difficult to determine a certain point in time where
Chinese communism became Chinese capitalism The steps towards capitalism have been
initialized as the communism practiced by Mao Zedong has proven to be an unsustainable
way to rein a country Chinese capitalism is certainly very different to the capitalism we are
usually confronted with due to the historic and present communist background China is still
a communist country and the Communist party is extremely focused on keeping its control
Applying McCrawrsquos scale to a communist economy would be rather pointless because
government intervention is usually at a maximum level However with the reforms towards a
more liberal economy the scale is very useful do determine the extent of freedom the
country has gained Therefore the more reforms were made regarding the Chinese economy
the closer it moved to phase three on McCrawrsquos scale - systematic state guidance of private
decision making Although China has been able to be considered economically at least partly
capitalistic for a while now China adopted property law one of the key pillars of capitalism
which state Citizens lawful private property is inviolable as late as in 2007 That shows that
China has managed to establish a different form of capitalism which only partly coincides
with the traditional Western one
Important bdquoSchumpeterian decisionsldquo
Profit driven enterprises are more likely to make ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decision
that will secure their survival over a long-term perspective Lenovo is a profit based
enterprise established due to an institutional spin-off and the company is run by professional
managers and entrepreneurs Lenovo has been forced to try to achieve the highest profit
possible in order to survive Therefore the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo entrepreneurial decisions made
by Lenovo should be analyzed in order to gain a better understanding of Lenovo
If Lenovo had not made the ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision in 1991 to move from salesdistribution
to manufacture of personal computers Lenovo might not be where they are today This was
an adaptive response as they reacted to the change in environment an increasing demand
for personal computers by starting their own production In the 1990s the 3rd Industrial
Revolution was already occurring in the developed countries the demand for consumers
rapidly increased in both the public and the private sector The state was about to lift the
protection of the Chinese computer industry and expose it to foreign competition This meant
that Lenovorsquos business with sales and distribution was suddenly superfluous because foreign
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
19 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
companies now could penetrate the Chinese market without a partnership with Lenovo
Therefore Lenovo decided to move into the manufacture of computers under its separate
brand Lenovo was able to do this because of the extensive technological know-how it had
gained from working with HP AST Toshiba etc ndash the company knew how to produce a
computer and it possessed the required distribution network Through their distribution
system in China Lenovo had also absorbed what demand and preferences the different
customers had and they knew marketing practices very well Therefore they were well suited
to enter the PC market Additionally Lenovo had through their sales and distribution
channels generated revenues and accumulated capital which made this step financially
possible for Lenovo
When looking at the significance of Lenovorsquos corporate history one could argue that the
company was the computer manufacturer that took the Chinese computer industry by
segmenting their products from phase 2 to 3 in model of The Three Phases of Marketing
Earlier the Chinese computer market was widely based on unification and mass production
The Chinese market was seen as a whole Lenovo started to segment the customers into
different groups and developed special products for each of these groups Lenovorsquos
segmentation consisted of many segments examples are the banking segment the SME
segment the big business segment the individual consumer segments (with different
segments underneath) etc This revolutionized the Chinese computer market and
competitors had to follow this change in order to survive There was no bridge back to
previous production pattern which is why this move should be considered as creative
destruction This also led to Lenovo spending millions of dollars on RampD on consumer
demands and habits Lenovo sees and essential aspect in understanding their consumers
well as it allows the company to attack certain consumer groups and develop products that
cover their demand In the year 2000 Lenovo won the Intel PC Innovation Award for their
innovative home oriented PC product designs which proofs Lenovo to be an extremely
consumer orientated company24
Lenovo made another ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when they shifted their focus towards
manufacturing leading technological products instead of low-costs computer products The
foreign competitors did not prioritize the Chinese market in the 1990s due to the relatively
small PC market Hence foreign competitors were not represented by their best products in
the Chinese market and foreign products were more expensive than Chinese computers
(Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Due to Chinarsquos growth rates the income level raised and
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
20 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
increased the wealth in Chinarsquos middle class which created a new much stronger consumer
market for high-quality products By 2002 the Chinese PC market was worth $ 10 billion the
3rd largest PC market behind the United States and Japan25 Lenovo realized this change
and moved into this emerging consumer market Being a first-mover in this respect gained
Lenovo huge advantages to their competitors This increasingly strong domestic market was
as lucrative as expected and enabled Lenovo to compete with their global competitorrsquos
quality products All they needed now to become a global player were global distribution
channels transnational production facilities and a good brand
With the acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division Lenovo had gained the distribution
channels the transnational production facilities and the good and reliable brand This
acquisition can be considered as a ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that was fundamental to the
companyrsquos survival and future growth According to Schumpeter any entrepreneur must have
a motivation or driving power that explains his entrepreneurial activity This motivation can
also be detected in Lenovorsquos entrepreneurial activity As Lenovo is a profit driven enterprise it
is determined to constantly seek maximization in profits willing to secure its survival If a
private enterprise stops seeking profit maximization it will lose its competitiveness Losing its
competitiveness means for a firm that it is not far from struggling with its existence Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBMrsquos Personal Computer Division is clearly driven by profit motivation and the
wish to expand beyond borders By the acquisition of IBM Lenovo gained further
technological know-how and expertise (Lenovo also gained 10000 employees of which 60
already were located in China26) Moreover Lenovo also gained a global brand global
distribution network and overseas facilities the basis for Lenovorsquos development into a global
player By 2011 Lenovo had gained a market share of 12 of the global PC market27 The
acquisition once again was fundamental for Lenovorsquos expansion to the global market and
their ability to compete with other global players in the IT-industry Hence the importance of
this adaptive response must be underlined as it had a great impact in Lenovorsquos growth and
survival as a computer producing company
25 httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=GVRLampuserGroup
Name=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcontentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearc
hFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamp
role=
26 httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
27 httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
21 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Lenovo reflects the Chinese variation of capitalism
Generally Lenovo has reflected the Chinese variation of capitalism throughout the last three
decades Maorsquos death in 1976 and the takeover by Confucianism influenced Deng Xiaoping
changed Chinarsquos course from communism towards the Chinese type of capitalism Several
changes in Lenovorsquos history reflect the reforms enforced by Deng Xiaoping
Lenovo as a spin-off enterprise from ICT reflects the political decisions of the early 1980s
made by Maorsquos successor Deng Xiaoping of moving China from a plan economy towards a
common market Deng Xiaoping was in favor of the Confucians idea of bottom-up changes
which exactly is what Lenovo reflects Liu and ten other scientists took advantage of the
governmentrsquos interest in commercializing ideas and creating sustainable enterprises based
on capitalist foundations This meant for Lenovo that they were in the start by principle was
allowed to fail The scientists had a new motivation for establishing enterprises having the
right to retain profits a fundamental part of a capitalist economy This entrepreneurial
motivation is essential in a capitalist economy ndash also according to Schumpeter (as mentioned
earlier in this paper) This start of Lenovo reflects the early variation of Chinese capitalism
where supply and demand were the main drivers towards a common market
Lenovorsquos vertical integration into the manufacturing of PCs reflects the governmental target
to create domestically competitive PC manufacturers in China Moving into manufacturing in
a more open Chinese economy enabled Lenovo to capture technology from foreign PC
manufacturers and apply this knowledge to their own production The Ministry of Electronic
Industry wanted Chinese enterprises to capture foreign technology so they could imitate it
Simply by gaining this knowledge about technology Chinese company would then be able to
profit from being second-movers (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) Lenovo is an explicitly good
example of a company gaining second-mover advantages and in this respect definitely
reflects the Chinese capitalism By reducing tariffs on imported PCs in 1992 (Tsui Bian and
Leonard 2006) Lenovo was exposed to foreign competition and this competition clearly has
benefitted Lenovo when you look at the company today in terms of the present position in the
PC industry It could be argued that a major reason for Lenovorsquos survival during the early
competition is also due to a major government subsidy from the 9th Five Year Plan from
1996-2000 (Tsui Bian and Leonard 2006) In a time where liberalization was still being
introduced and the level of competition in China Lenovo has been able to develop a
sustainable competitiveness and has risen to a strong global player This development
reflects the movement of enterprises in the Chinese capitalism at that time very well
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
22 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Furthermore Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism as it is a company that has profited
from government support to a great extend The Chinese government wanted large
enterprises that are able to set up a mass production and thereby produce much cheaper
and efficient Lenovo received support from the government through protectionism and
subsidies This reflects Chinese capitalism in a period of liberalization and the governmentrsquos
idea to support the growth of ldquoimportantrdquo industries wherefore China enforced the ldquopicking
the winnersrdquo approach The CPC was simply supporting the industries they considered
important and likely to make good profits in the future in order to create ldquonational championsrdquo
Another importance the government saw in growing companies was to secure Chinarsquos most
important commodity ndash stability First Lenovo was supported to become a domestic
champion Later on it became a global player by the acquisition of IBMrsquos PC division which
once again secured the companyrsquos growth and stability Furthermore a Multi National
Enterprise (MNE) like Lenovo is more likely to contribute positively to the countryrsquos balance
of payments A surplus in the trade balance makes it easier for the state to control the
currency and avoid inflation which is of supreme importance for the countryrsquos stability Thus
the strife for stability is deeply rooted in the Chinese capitalism and is clearly seen in the
government support given to Lenovo
Lenovorsquos acquisition of IBM in 2005 reflects the decrease of regulation and lowered barriers
for trade and foreign direct investment that were a consequence of China becoming a
member of the WTO in 2001 Entering the WTO China also obviously wanted their economy
to become more integrated in the global trade and businesses to act more globally Lenovorsquos
acquisition of IBM clearly reflects Chinarsquos lowered barriers for FDI as they attracted IBM to
enter the Chinese market a few years before Earlier Chinese companies were not able to
make big outward FDIs maybe because it created pressure on the currency Yuan But the
entrance required less regulation of various Chinese protectionist apparatus and gave
Lenovo the opportunity to acquire foreign companies The acquisition of IBM thereby reflects
the capitalism at that time
Conclusion
Analysing the present nature of capitalism in China it quickly turnes out that the countryrsquos
history has had a great impact on the Chinese capitalism as we see it today China has been
in transition since the first reform in 1978 from a static communist plan economy towards a
market-based capitalist economy The various reforms first in the 1980s then 1990s and
later in the next wave until today explain the development of Chinese capitalism The
Chinese capitalism has emerged out of a communist party and reasoned by the countryrsquos
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
23 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
history is very much influenced by the valuation given to ldquostabilityrdquo in China In the last
decades Chinese capitalism has shown how various types of capitalism can succeed when
competing on the global market Participating in the global trade symbolized by the entry in
the WTO in 2001 has enforced a further liberalization of the Chinese capitalist economy
The communist Party China (CPC) is still the only active party in the government However it
has dropped most of its communist ideals and keeps implementing capitalist characteristics
which is why the Chinese capitalism is placed between degree 3 and 4 of government
intervention on the scale of McCraw It has moved through various phases in terms of
starting its capitalist existence at degree 4 on McCrawrsquos scale and with continuously
decreasing government intervention moving towards degree 3
In conclusion the fact that Lenovo was able to become domestic market leader was mainly a
result of the well-established network of distributors the successful vertical integration of the
manufacture link and the beneficial know-how acquired from IBM By imitating the
fundamental assembling procedure combined with the advantage of the integrated channels
of distribution Lenovo managed to position its brand that combined efficiency with
innovation When looking at Chinese capitalism in relation to the corporate history of Lenovo
the role of the one-party system played a crucial role by stabilizing the recently formed
company The governmental promotions of Lenovo together with the Chinese IT-industry
experiencing Third Industrial Revolution both were decisive factors in the global success that
the company eventually achieved
The Schumpeterian theory proves how different types of responses are decisive when it
comes to competing in the global market place These responses all took place in a business
environment influenced by the special type of capitalism that characterizes the Chinese
economy As part of The Third Industrial Revolution the evolving Chinese economy provided
a huge increase in domestic demand from which Lenovo was able to display its potential
Conclusively this was realized as a result of all the adaptive responses that Lenovo was
making in order to carry on the legacy of IBM
Schumpeterian
Several rdquoSchumpeterianrdquo decisions have been made throughout Lenovorsquos history which
secured the companyrsquos growth and survival By moving from distribution and sales into
manufacturing of PCs Lenovo made an important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision that secured that
Lenovo would not be superfluous in the future due to reforms towards a common market
Likewise when they went from low-cost computers to the more lucrative high-end products it
also secured growth through a first-mover advantage in the new domestic consumer market
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
24 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
created by the new Chinese middle-class that is developing by the process of urbanization
Once again Lenovo made and important ldquoSchumpeterianrdquo decision when it acquired IBMrsquos
personal computer division which turned Lenovo into a global player instead of only a
domestic one This acquisition secured future growth through new technology and know-
how a good brand global distribution channels and global production facilities
China and Lenovo
The development of Lenovo reflects the development of the Chinese capitalism in different
ways Lenovo was an institutional spin-off provoked by governmentrsquos wish to establish more
profit-driven enterprises The entrepreneurs had an incentive to establish these enterprises
as they were allowed able to retain profits ndash a fundamental element in capitalism The
government emphasized the vertical integration made by China into the manufacturing of
PCs The state wanted to create big domestic players in ldquoimportantrdquo industries able to reach
economies of scale The state wished more economies of scale because such are more
competitive which was of great importance willing to compete with the increasing
competition through foreign competitors entering the Chinese market Hence this move by
Lenovo reflects the Chinese capitalism at that time By using a ldquopicking the winnersrdquo strategy
the Chinese state supported these ldquoimportantrdquo industries both directly and indirectly This is
also a clear element of the Chinese capitalism of the latest decades Although China is
moving towards a more capitalist economy with a more liberal market the state still
intervenes a lot to control and guide the economy
Finally the acquisition of IBM reflects a movement of the Chinese capitalism into more
openness triggered by the entrance into WTO The entrance provided Chinese companies
with less regulatory and cleared the path for outward FDI The IBM acquisition was a symbol
of a more international Chinese capitalism
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011
Lenovo 26092011
25 CBS - The Company in its Historical and International Setting BSc International Business
Literature List
McCraw Thomas K (1997) Creating Modern Capitalism How Entrepreneurs Companies and
Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions Harvard University Press
Tsui Anne S Bian Tanjie C Leonard (2006) Chinarsquos Domestic Private Firms Armonk M E
Sharpe
Quelch John amp Knoop Carin-Isabel (2006)rdquoLenovo Building a Global Brandrdquo Harvard
Business School October 19 Harvard HBS Premier Case Collection
Joseph Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History The Journal of Economic
History vol VII Nov 1947 no 2
Web articles
httpwwwinternationalviewpointorgspipphparticle1519 22092011
httpwwwspiegeldeinternational0151844255200html 22092011gt
httpwwwbusinessweekcommagazinecontent05_34b3948478htm 22092011
httpwwwfasorgsgpcrsrowRL32165pdf 22092011
httpwwwindependentcouknewsbusinessnewschina-overtakes-germany-to-become-largest-exporter-1864052html 23092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55824mod_resourcecontent1JWT20in20Chinapdf p7 2092011
httpwwweconomistcomnode12333103 22092011
httpslearncbsdkpluginfilephp55822mod_resourcecontent1Capitalism20with20Socialist20Characteristicspdf p14 20092011
httpnewsbbccouk2hiasia-pacific6456959stm 22092011
httpwwwwtoorgenglishnews_epres01_epr243_ehtm 23092011
httpsorbis2bvdepcomesc-weblibcbsdk8443version-
2011912Reportservsp_parentcontext=ipaddressampseqnr=0ampcontext=1KAS6ZIZH2PLQ81amp_
cid=72 2009-11
httpwwwlenovocomwwlenovoshareholdinghtml 2020-11
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 2109-11
httpcitationallacademiccommetap_mla_apa_research_citation16903pages169033p16
9033-19php page 19 21092011
httpsiteebrarycomesc-weblibcbsdklibkbhnhhdocDetailactiondocID=10178095 page
284 19092011
httpgogalegroupcomesc-
weblibcbsdkpsretrievedosgHitCountType=Noneampsort=RELEVANCEampinPS=trueampprodId=
GVRLampuserGroupName=cbsamptabID=T003ampsearchId=R1ampresultListType=RESULT_LISTampcon
tentSegment=ampsearchType=BasicSearchFormampcurrentPosition=1ampcontentSet=GALE|CX3483
800057ampampdocId=GALE|CX3483800057ampdocType=GALEamprole= page 210 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkaaref=scmp000020011003dt3j00qchamppp=1ampfcpil=enampnapc=Sampsa_from= 18092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548htm
httpwwwchinadailycomcnbizchina2011-0905content_13617052htm 19092011
httpglobalfactivacomesc-weblibcbsdkhadefaultaspx 19092011
httpwwwchinadailycomcncndy2011-0909content_13654548html 19092011
httpwwweconomistcomblogsdailychart201109global-economic-dominance 09092011