Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd
-
Upload
robin-agarwal -
Category
Education
-
view
215 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd
![Page 1: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Consumer behavior in take-home premium ice-cream
segment
Group 3: Aditya SharmaRobin Agarwal
Prasan Arora
A focus on Ben & Jerry’s and Häagen-Dazs in Singapore
![Page 2: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Contents Industry Overview Research Objective Key findings from Literature Review Research Methodology Data Analysis Key Findings Managerial Recommendations Limitation Scope Key Learning
![Page 3: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3 Industry Overview
![Page 4: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Industry Overview
In 2011: ice cream segment grew 4% to reach S$118 million
Take Home segment commands a market share of 86% (volume sales).
While the CAGR (‘06-’11)for On Site segment was a mere 0.7%, the CAGR (‘06-’11) for Take Home was 2.3%
Shift in consumer preference to premium segment led to increase in average unit price of ice cream in 2011.
Therefore, premium brands performed well in 2011.
Source: Euro monitor report – Ice Cream in Singapore – December 2011
![Page 5: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Industry Overview
Source: Euro monitor report – Ice Cream in Singapore – December 2011
2007 2008 2009 2010 20110.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%
YoY growth in the Take Home segment
2007 2008 2009 2010 20110.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%
YoY growth in the On-Site segment
![Page 6: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Industry Overview
Brand Company 2007 2008 2009 2010
Wall's Unilever Singapore Pte Ltd 12.8 12.8 13 12.7
Magnolia F&N Foods (S) Pte Ltd 13.3 13.3 12.7 12.3
Häagen-Dazs
General Mills Asia Pte Ltd 10.1 10.1 10.3 10.5
Ben & Jerry's
Unilever Singapore Pte Ltd 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.7
Source: Euro monitor report – Ice Cream in Singapore – December 2011
Standard brands: Wall’s, MagnoliaPremium brands: Häagen-Dazs & Ben & Jerry’s
Brand Shares (% retail value rsp)
![Page 7: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7 Research Objectives
![Page 8: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Research Objectives
To identify factors that drive the consumption of premium ice cream brands in Singapore
To rate these factors in order of importance and effectiveness
To classify and compile the findings with respect to different segments in the target audience
To identify managerial implications and to make recommendations which may grow business for a premium ice cream brand
![Page 9: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9 Key Findings from Literature Review
![Page 10: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Key Findings from Literature Review
Price
Brand
Health Consciousness
Convenient Packaging
Taste/ Flavors
Purchase Decision
Independent Variables Dependent Variables
![Page 11: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11 Research Methodology
![Page 12: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Research Methodology
Research Methodology
Secondary Research
Literature Review
Analysis of - Market share, growth rates, categories in the industry
Primary Research
Qualitative
Industry Experts
Open Ended interviews
with customers
Quantitative
Survey questionnair
e
Statistical Analysis
![Page 13: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Secondary Research
Research Reports
EBSCO host
Euro Monitor, Data Monitor
National Library of Singapore
Google Scholar
![Page 14: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Research Methodology
Used SPSS software to analyze the responses to the survey
Factor Analysis
Cluster Analysis
Cross tab Analysis
Perceptual Mapping
![Page 15: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15 Data Analysis
![Page 16: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Sample Demographics
51%49%
Gender
MaleFemale
8%
21%
49%
16%
6%
Age (in years)
below 1818-2526-3536-45Above 45
48%
29%
23%
Citizenship
ExpatSingaporean CitizenSingaporean PR
56%32%
2%
10%
Residence Type
HDBCondominiumBunglowOther
26%
62%
5%7%
0%
Occupation
StudentEmployedSelf-employedHome makerOther
9%
20%
16%
12%
28%
15%
Monthly Household Income
Below S$2500S$2500 - S$5000S$5000 - S$10000Above S$10000I don't want to discloseNot Applicable
56%32%
2% 10%
Residence Type
HDBCondominiumBunglowOther
![Page 17: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Factor Analysis
Rotated Component Matrix(a)
Component
1 2 3 4Brand 0.728 Willingness to pay 0.712 Price -0.604 Taste 0.837 Quality 0.776 Substitutes 0.716 Low calorie 0.676 Special occasions 0.638 Sales promotion 0.746Packaging 0.723
Brand LoyaltySensory
PerceptionHealth
consciousnessValue for Money
![Page 18: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
• Buy same brand of ice cream• Don’t mind spending more for
preferred brand• Price is important
Brand Loyalty
• Taste is important• Quality is important
Sensory Perception
• Buy substitutes• Consciously look for low-calorie ice
cream• Buy premium ice cream for special
occasion
Health Consciousn
ess• Buy more ice cream on promotions• Prefer to buy multipack over single
pack
Value for me
Factor Analysis
![Page 19: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19 Cluster Analysis
![Page 20: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Generated Clusters
K-means clustering used A total of 3 clusters generated on the
basis of the following factors: Brand Loyalty Sensory Perception Health – Consciousness Value for Money
![Page 21: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Brand Loyalty
Sensory Perception
Health Consciousness
Value for Money
Brand Loyalty 0.30
Sensory Perception -1.29
Health Consciousness 0.12
Value for Money 0.11
Cluster 1
Final Cluster Center
![Page 22: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Important characteristics
Medium Brand loyalty score relative to others Least on Quality & Taste compared to other
clusters Open to substitutes like yoghurts and low-calorie
ice creams Average attraction to Promotions and packaging
relative to others 56% of the respondents in this market are
females Majority (67%) of the respondents are employed Most of the respondents (27%) fall into the low
monthly income group of S$2500- S$5000
![Page 23: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Cluster 2
Brand Loyalty
Sensory Perception
Health Consciousness
Value for Money
Brand Loyalty 0.76
Sensory Perception 0.53
Health Consciousness -0.15
Value for Money -0.32
Final Cluster Center
![Page 24: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Important characteristics
Extremely brand loyalHigh Willingness to buyPrice not an important factor while buyingHigh quality and taste demandedDon’t look for substitutes and are not health
consciousUnaffected by promotion sales and offersPackaging is also not an important criteriaMale dominated segment (54%)Consist of 66% employed whole mainly live in
HDB (57%)
![Page 25: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Cluster 3
Brand Loyalty
Sensory Perception
Health Consciousness
Value for Money
Brand Loyalty -0.89
Sensory Perception 0.28
Health Consciousness 0.06
Value for Money 0.23
Final Cluster Center
![Page 26: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Important characteristics
Not at all brand conscious Not willing to buy if expensive Taste and quality are a mild purchase drivers Less influenced by the presence of substitutes
and low calorie products in the market Highly influenced by the promotional offers and
deals on ice cream products Consider convenient packaging an important
criteria Female dominated (36%) 47% are expats and 57% live in HDB
![Page 27: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Identified Segments
Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3
Brand Loyalty
0.30 0.76 -0.89
Sensory Perception
-1.29 0.53 0.28
Health Consciousnes
s0.12 -0.15 0.06
Value for
Money0.11 -0.32 0.23
Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3
Brand Loyalty
Medium High Low
Sensory Perception
Low High Medium
Health Consciousnes
sHigh Low Medium
Value for
MoneyMedium Low High
Cluster 1 Cluster 2EconomicalSegment Cluster 1
Superior Segment
BalancedSegment
![Page 28: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28 Perceptual Mapping
![Page 29: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Balanced Segment
1 - Brand2 - Price3 - Quality4 - Taste
SegmentBrands
![Page 30: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Superior Segment
1 - Brand2 - Price3 - Quality4 - Taste
SegmentBrands
![Page 31: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Economical Segment
SegmentBrands
1 - Brand2 - Price3 - Quality4 - Taste
![Page 32: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32Managerial
Recommendations
![Page 33: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Balanced Segment
Ben & Jerry’s is lagging behind in C1 segment
Quality and taste is not so important factor
56% females Maximum no. if
homemakers 50% are married 52% - influence
for family 61% - buy for
family
Diversify to health related products – low calories and low fat
Introduce Greek Frozen yogurt in Singapore
Long term - as a family pack
![Page 34: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Superior Segment
Taste & quality of prime importance
Price is not important
High-earning group (21% highest in all 3 segments)
Free sampling of existing flavors in supermarkets
Value proposition - launching a super premium product
Set at high price Willingness to pay for preferred brand
Price sensitivity rating
Balanced 3.79 3.11
Superior 4.29 2.77
Economy 3.36 4.17
![Page 35: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Economy Segment
37% students 33%
Singaporean citizens
Maximum social media users
Max traditional media audience
Bundling of plain flavors to promote multipack
Cross promotion with supermarkets during festivals and promotions
Occasional Purchase Buy more on Promotion
Balanced 3.27 3.27
Superior 3.43 3.43
Economy 3.62 3.75
![Page 36: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36 Limitations
![Page 37: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Limitations
Sample data may not be representative of ice cream consumer population of Singapore in terms of ethnicity, residence status, geographies and other demographic parameters
The research does not focus on the strategic influence on the take home consumers by the onsite consumption
Although majority of the take home segment comprises of supermarkets , the research did not give much weightage to other retail avenues in the take home segment
The research did not include in-house brands of major retailers such as Fair Price and Carrefour
![Page 38: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38 Scope
![Page 39: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Future Scope This research can be used as a reference for
emerging brands in the premium ice cream segment
Insights from this research can help formulate the market entry strategy for a new player in the premium segment
More extensive data collection can improve the quality of the present study
In light of the slow growth rate forecast for the segment , this research can be used as a starting point to forecast future trends
![Page 40: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40 Key Learnings
![Page 41: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Key Learnings Survey questionnaire should be well structured Wide range of demographics of respondents
must be ensured Research objectives, framework and
methodology should be in sync A good literature review forms the basis of a
good research At every stage of gathering primary data, the
consistency and the acceptability of the data must be checked
![Page 42: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Thank You!
![Page 43: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Qualitative Research
Most preferred brands – Häagen-Dazs & Ben & Jerry’s
Buying frequency – once a month
Most bought quantity – 473 ml
No specific occasional purchase
Most preferred flavors – Chocolate and Vanilla
Factors considered while buying – Brand, Taste, Quality and Price
31%
27%
12%
12%
19%
Haagen DazsBen & Jerry'sMagnoliaDreyersOthers
Division based on preference
![Page 44: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Qualitative Research
Most popular brands – Häagen-Dazs & Ben & Jerry’s
80% of consumers buy single pack
Most convenient place to buy – Supermarkets
Low-fat ice cream not popular
Favorite substitute (35%) – Yoghurts
Reason for buying ice cream – love for it, weather conditions, taste
14%
29%
26%
17%
7%
7%
MagnoliaHaagen DazsBen & Jerry'sWallsNestleOthers
Division based on popularity
![Page 45: Group 3 arp presentation_final_bj_hd](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051610/5499cba0b47959a8738b4639/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
Demographics
26%
62%
5%7%
0%
Occupation
StudentEmployedSelf-employedHome makerOther
9%
20%
16%
12%
28%
15%
Monthly Household Income
Below S$2500S$2500 - S$5000S$5000 - S$10000Above S$10000I don't want to discloseNot Applicable
56%32%
2% 10%
Residence Type
HDBCondominiumBunglowOther