Greyhound: Separation and Allocation Procedures for Western Greyhound Lines 1961 - Cal PUC

161
" '4 .:' Exhibit 78 . J. une 6 , 1961 Witness A.e .porter. CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM!SSIÚN TRANSPORTATION DIVISION , ENGINEERING ECONOMICS - PASSENGER SECTION - ' ,' " . * * * . - BRANCH APPUCATION No. 4 005 71 Amd.) E XHlS IT No .: 78 W rFNESS: A. C. ? ORT ER DATE: JUNE 6, CO MMISSIONER: MITC: iElL EXAMI NER: THOMPSON SEP ARATION AND ALLOCATION PRO CEDURES EQR W ESTERN GREYHOUND , LINES , (A DIVISION OF . THE GREYHOUND CORPORATION) * * * * * .- San Francisco, California Ma y 1 7"" 1961

description

California Public Utilities Commission, Transportation Division, Engineering Economics Branch, Passenger Section. Separation and AllocationProcedures for Western Greyhound Lines (A Division of The Greyhound Corporation). San Francisco, California. May 17, 1961 Application No. 4007 (Amd.) Exhibit No: 78. A-40057 Witness A.C. Porter Date: June 6, 1961 Commissioner: Mitchell Examiner: Thompson

Transcript of Greyhound: Separation and Allocation Procedures for Western Greyhound Lines 1961 - Cal PUC

  • "'4 .:'

    Exhibit 78 . J.une 6 , 1961

    Witness A.e .porter.

    CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM!SSIN

    TRANSPORTATION DIVISION ~ ,

    ENGINEERING ECONOMICS - PASSENGER SECTION

    -

    ' ,' " .

    * * *

    . -

    BRANCH APPUCATION No. 400571Amd.) EXHlSIT No.: 78 WrFNESS: A. C. ?ORTER DATE: JUNE 6, 1~61 COMMISSIONER: MITC:iElL EXAMINER: THOMPSON

    SEPARATION AND ALLOCATION PROCEDURES

    EQR WESTERN GREYHOUND , LINES , (A DIVISION OF. THE GREYHOUND CORPORATION)

    * * * * *

    .

    San Francisco, California May 17"" 1961

  • --

    1

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Page Foreword .

    Section 1 - General Discussion

    Account 3200 - Passenger Revenue 6

    Accoun t 4152 - Servicing Revenue Equipment-Wa shing

    Ac count 4531 - Public Liability and Property Damage

    Investment, Reserve and Depreciation, Expense,

    Account 3210 - Special Bus Revenue (Ch~rter) 8

    Account 3400 - Expr ess Revenue 9

    Bus Mile Expens es ... 11

    Tr affic Characteristics . . 12

    Operating Zones and Zone Grouping . 12

    Motor Coaches and Motor Coach Grouping.. 14

    Equivalent Passenger Mi1e Al1ocation Method 16

    Account 4143 - Revenue Equipment - Accident Repair 30

    Accoun t 4151 - Servicing Revenue Equipment -Lubrication. 32

    and Clean ing 33

    Account 4211 - Supervision of Transportation 35

    Account 4220 - Dri vers I Wages . 37

    Account 4230 - Fu e1 for Revenue Equipment 39

    Acc ount 4262 - B~idge , Tunne1 & Ferry To11s 40

    Account 4308 - Stat i on Expenses 43

    Account 4311 - Station Salaries 44

    Ac count 4331 - Commi ss ions Paid 48

    Account 4340 - Inter1ine Commissions Paid 49

    Ac count 4350 - Interline Commissions Earned 49

    Station Overheads. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~O

    Account 4410 - Salaries and Expenses, Traffic Solicitation 52

    Account 4440 Tickets and Baggage Checks 53

    Account 4470 - Advertising . . . ... 55

    Self Insurer 57

    Account 4600 - Administrative and General Expense 59

    Land and Structures 61

    Account 5310 - Equipment Rents - Debit 62

    Account 5350 - Equipment Rents - Credit . 62

    **********

  • TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Section 11 - Procedures

    Page

    Account 3000 - Operating Revenues . . . .

    66 Account 4100

    -Equipment Maintenance and Garage Expense 75

    Account 4200 - Transportation Expense 83

    92Account 4300

    -Station Expense .

    Account 4400 -

    Traffic and Advertising Expense. 99

    Account 4500

    -Insurance and Safety Expense 104

    Account 4600 -

    Administrative and General Expense 112

    Account 5000 - Depreciation Expense 113

    Account 5200 - Operating Taxes & Licenses 121

    Account 5300 - Operating Rents - Net. 129

    Account 1100 - Material and Supplies . . 135 Account 1200

    -Investment . . . 113 & 136

    **********

    Glossary , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137

    **********

    List of Illustrations

    Operating Divisions - The Greyhound Corporation 5 Operating Divis ions - Wes tern Greyhound Lines . . 13 Chart A - Length of Ride - Bus Miles Per 1000 Passenger Miles 22 Passenger Toll Trips . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Figure 1 - General Procedures For Allocating California

    Station Salaries - Account 4311. 47 General Separation and Allocation Procedure . . . . . . 65

    **********

    List of Tables

    1 System and California Average Cost Per Bus Mile Maintenance of Equipment - Zone Group 1 . . . . . 17

    11 Procedure for Distributing and Allocating Maintenance of Equipment Expense to Zone Groups . . . . . . .. 18

    111 Equivalent Bus Mile Percents - California Operations Zone Group l. . . . . . . .. ....... 19

    IV Equivalent Passenger Mile Percents - California Operations - Zone Group 1. . . . . 20

    V Mainline Zone Groups . . . . . .. ....... 23 VI Local Zone Groups ......... . . .. 27 VII Motor Coach Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 VIII System and California Average Cost Per Bus Mile

    Drivers' Wages - Zone Group 1. . . . . .. 38

  • FOREWORQ

    Western Greyhound Lines, a division of The Greyhound

    Corporation~, is engaged in furnishing intrastate and interstate passenger and express motor coach transportation services

    in 11 Western States* and Canada. The intrastate services are

    subject to the jurisdiction of the several state regulatory bodies and the interstate services are subject to the jurisdiction of the Interstate Cornmerce Commission . Two distinct types of service are rendered by the company; these

    are intercity-mainline and local-interurban services. The

    former i5 generally termed mainline service and the latter local

    service. The mainline service is involved in the common

    transportation of both intrastate and interstate traffic,

    whereas the local service is almost exclusively devoted to

    intrastate transportation in certain metropolitan areas of

    California, Oregon, and Washington. In terms of bus miles

    operated, the mainline service represents ninety percent of

    the company ' s operation. It follows then that the major portion of the company's facilities are used in common for

    both intrastate a~d interstate traffic. Similarly, the major portion of the company's expenses are incurred in providing

    these joint services. Therefore, a uniform method of separation between intrastate and interstate traffic is

    essential so that revenues, expenses, taxes and investment

    ~ See map, Page ~ . * Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Montana,

    Oregon, Texas, U~h, Washington and Wyoming.

    - 1

  • subject to the respective types of traffic may be determined. This manual is the product of a joint effort made over the past two years by the staff of the California Public Utilities

    Commission, Transportation Division, Engineering Economics

    Branch, and the management of Western Greyhound Lines to

    develop fair and equitable separation and allocation

    procedures acceptable to both parties. The procedures

    contained in this manual, although specifically designed for

    Western Greyhound's operation in California, are considered to

    be generally appropriate for any intercity motor coach

    operation under any jurisdiction. In certain cases, further analyses and studies may be required in order to adapt the

    procedures to such additional separations.

    The long established primary principIes upon which

    this manual is based are those of "actual use" or "relative

    use"*. An attempt has been made to minimize "relative use"

    and maximize "actual use" separations. This objective is best realized by the practically direct separation of local

    operations from system operations, which represents the ideal

    allocation. However, due to practical considerations, certain

    "short cuts" are occasionally used where it can be demonstrated

    that they produce essentially the same results that would be

    obtained by more thorough and time-consuming processes thus

    balancing the ideal allocation with the practical. The

    procedures outli~ed represent, in the judgment of those

    Unite~ States Supr eme Court, Smith V. 111inoi5, Bell* I~lf20Qne Cq.~ 282 U.S . 133 (1930).

    - 2

  • preparing the manual, as near an ideal allocation' as present

    data and methods permite However, it should not be construed

    that this manual is the final answer to all motor coach

    allocation problems; on the contrary, it is to be expected

    that improved techniques will develop as new data and testing

    procedures are devised. Most of the fundamental procedures

    used in this manual were developed by the staff of the

    Commission and presented in hearing$ before the Commission in Application No. 38019 of Pacific Greyhound Lines, a predecessor

    of Western Greyhound Lines. Numerous improvements of those

    procedures have been incorporated herein especially in the use

    of data processing equipment and special study techniques. No

    exposition is made for the many pathways explored, given

    careful consideration and ultimately discarded for lack of

    practicability or validity.

    The procedures developed have been tested for

    practicable application against two historical periods of

    company operations. The first test was made for the year

    ended March 31, 1960, and the second for the year ended

    September 30, 1960. Fortunately, changes in traffic patterns

    made these two periods sufficiently dissimilar to afford a

    reasonable test as to whether results produced by the

    procedures accurately reflect the change in results that can

    be predicated by informed judgment. This manual has been prepared in two sections.

    Section 1 deals with an explanation of the approach to and

    solution of allocation problems involved in the major accounts. It is not intended to be a complete dissertation on technique

    - 3

  • but, rather, a brief outline of the approach used. Section 11

    sets forth in detail the procedures used for each individual

    account and is intended to be first, a working outline for the

    use of those thoroughly familiar with the special studies and

    techniques employed and, second, a general outline for those

    wishing to further explore the bases used for allocating each

    account.

    For convenience, a glossary of terms as they are

    especially used herein is included at the end of the manual.

    - 4

  • ;

    Mannoba /Nsnr ( ....)- ro .... LASKA

    (

    --.;,;;.!....;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;=;;;;;;~----~-----".. :\ot ":\O" fR[O(lICKS8U~~ - Eastern Greyhound Lmes Southern Greyhound Unes --- Western Greyhound Unes -----. New Mexico Transportation Greyhound Unes of Canada ----- Crown Coach Co. _ . --- Southeastern Stages Kerrville Bus Company

    Central Greyhound Unes Southern Kansas Greyhound Unes Eastern Canadian Greyhound Unes

    =#= Only one coupon requ ired between El Paso and lake Charles via either Fort Worth or San Antonio. CONNECTING CARRIERS

    1. B. C. Coach Unes 14. Northern Transportation Co. 27. Citizen Auto Stage Ca. 2. Orange Belt Unes 15. Harmony Short Unes 28. Boise Wnnemueea Slages 3. Oklahoma Transportation Co. 16, l as VegasTonopahReno Stage Unes 29. Twin FallsWells-Nevada Slage 4. Colonial Coach Unes 17, Provincial Transport Co. 30. Canadian Coacllways. Ud. 5. Gray Coach Unes. ltd. 18. Saskalchewan Transportalion Ca. 31. Northern Stages. Ud. 6. Canyon Transportation Co. 19. S.M.T. (Eastern) Ud. 32. Carlsbad Cavern Coaehes 7. Intermountain Transportation Co. 20. Northea stern Missouri Unes 33. Alaska Motor Coaches 8. Jack Rabbit Unes 21. T.N.M. & O. Coaches 34. Gray Une 9. Jefferson Transportation Co. 22. Triangle Transportation Co, 35. Pacfic Stage Unes

    10. Sun Valley Bus Unes 23. Vermonl Transit Co. 36. Harbar Unes 11. Lemeli n Bus Unes 24. Redd ing'lakev iew Slages 37. Gulf Coast Motor Une 12. Quebec Cenlral Transportation Co. 25. Yosemite Transportation System 38. Abbott Bus Unes 13. NavaHop Tours 26. Manitoba Motor Transit 39. Northwestern Sl age Une

    f'S SONOU ,' O ~ ...."' ..... ,l LE..~~

    Thc sole pur p

  • I NSElU (A)-TO ALASKA

    (

    The sole purpose of this map is to indicate the points bf'!twecn which individual ticket coupons should be pro vided whcn passengers are roulcd via the companies shown hereon . It does nal show 3111 avaitab le rou t ings. Rt'erence must be madc to tar i!!s for authority to route traHic via eith.! r these a l' a thel' r autes .

    The ticke t fol'm of the company t hat first cardes the passenger is to be used . A scparate caupon i5 required lo r caeh eo m pa ny shown 01'1 this map. see c gcnd . In selling transportation to points al' over connc e tin g carders nol sho wn on this map. a n additional coupon i5 required lor each connecting carrier ove r which passenger is routcd. Points at which t"h e passenge r requires s topover s are lo b t: indieated on the r everse side ol the p r ape l' company's coupon .

    Thi s ma!> is nol drawn to scale

    LIT HO. IN U. S . A. 5

  • ACCOUNT 3200 - PASSENG~~ REVENUE

    The total system p ~6senge~ r evenue .f Wester n Grey_

    hound Lines is represented by the value of a11 tickets honcred

    throughout the sy5tem; it i5 determined for any 5pecific period

    of time by summarizing all of the ticket sales applicable te

    transportation provided during that periodo Passenger revenue

    is regularly developed for statistical zones. These data are

    used as the basis for the revenue for a state or individual

    operation. In developing passenger revenue by zones, the

    average revenue per passenger mile for a particular zone is

    applied to the total passenger miles traveled in that zone for

    any given period of time. This developed zone revenue is then

    corrected to the actual revenue by a small adjustment factor. The average revenue per passenger mile and the passenger miles

    are developed in the following manner:

    A revenue factor (average fare per passenger mile) for an individual zone is determined by analyzing a11 the

    tickets honored on the zone for periodic three-day test checks.

    Portions of the through fares for tickets used in interzone

    transfer travel are prorated to the zones involved on a mileage

    basis; for combination fare tickets, the effect of differences

    in fare structures are restricted to the portions of the trip

    where they apply. In rating a zone, the prorated fares are

    combined with fares of intra-zone riders for the test periods;

    the total zone revenue thus obtained i5 then divided by the

    passenger miles traveled in the zone during the test periods

    and the result is the revenue per passenger mile. Between

    test periods, this average fare per passenger mile for each

    zone is adjusted according to the fluctuations in the average

    - 6

  • length of ride by adding or subtracting an experimentally

    determined revenue factor for each two-mile inc~ement in the

    variation of the average length of ride. The total mainline

    passenger revenue for the various sta tes is determined for

    any specified period by developing the zone revenue earned in

    a state for every zone operating in that state for the periodo

    The total mainline intrastate revenue is then developed zone

    by zone by applying the relationships that existed during the

    test periods.

    Zone passenger miles are tabulated from drivers'

    daily trip reports. The passenger miles related to each

    driver's report are calculated by extending the number of

    through passengers by the driver's division route mile s and

    the number of intermediate passengers by an average distance

    of travel determined by the periodic checks; these checks are

    a150 used to determine the percentage distribution by sta tes

    of the total passenger miles traveled in interstate zones and,

    similarly, the sta te intrastate passenger miles in each zone.

    For the various local or suburban operations,

    periodic testsof the average fare per pas5enger are made by

    analyzing the ticket lift for three-day periods. This

    average fare is then applied to the total passenger count for

    a given period determined from drivers' daily records of the

    number of passengers carried. The passengers are summarized by

    weekdays, Saturdays, and Sundays; each category has its own

    average fare per passenger. Passenger miles for local

    operations are developed from these passenger statistics and

    average lengths of ride determined from periodic samples.

    O 0 O

    - 7

  • ACCOUNT 3210 - SPECIAL BUS REVENUE (CHARTER) Special bus revenue for a given period, applicable

    to individual state and intrastate operations, is developed

    from regular special studies. These special studies involve

    an analysis of revenue earned by the various operations

    during selected months of the periodo (As an example, for the year ended September 30, 1960, the months of November 1959, May 1960, and July 1960, were analyzed.) From this analysis the revenue earned in a particular state from intra

    state charter trips is developed and becomes intrastate char

    ter revenue. A further analysis is mada to determine what

    portion of the revenue earned from intersta te charter trips

    is assignable to that particular state. The intrastate to

    tal is added to the interstate total for the state and the

    result is the state total charter revenue. These totals are

    then related to the system revenue for the test months to

    obta in percentage factors to apply to recorded revenue for

    state total revenue and state intrastate revenue. For va

    lidity, current factors are compared to factors used for

    previous periods. Bus mile, passenger and passenger mile

    statistics pertaining to special bus operdtions are developed

    from the same test months.

    For allocation purposes, the revenues and expenses

    pertaining to charter are assigned to a special mainline zone

    group concerned exclusively with charter operdtions. Even

    though about lOr of the miles operated in charter service are

    run by buses which ordinarily are used in local operations,

    the mileage costs of operating these buses and the investment

    and depreciation expense attached to them are allocated to

    the charter zone group. O O O - ~

  • ACCOUNT 3400 - EXPRESS REVENUE

    The total amount of express revenue earned by

    Western Greyhound Lines during a specific period of time is

    determined by tabuldting the individual charges shown on all

    of the bus ills used during the periodo The charges shown

    on busbills used for interline shipments are allocated to

    Western Greyhound Lines and the connecting carriers on a

    mileage basis.

    The allocation of express revenue among the various

    states in which Western Greyhound Lines operates is based on

    percentages which are determined by periodic checks of all

    busbills handled throughout the system. The express revenue

    analysis made for the test period includes a suromary of all

    intrastate revenues by states and a distribution on a mileage

    basis of the revenues earned on all interstate shipments to

    the states involved. The total express revenue earned in any

    state during the test period is the suro of the intrastate and

    allocated interstate revenues. Using the totals thus ob

    tained, the percentage of system revenue that is earned in

    each state is calculated; also, for each state, the per

    centage of system revenue that is represented by its intra

    state revenue is calculated. These percentages are then used

    in allocating system express revenue to any state both on a

    total or an intrastate basis.

    A remarkable degree of consistency has been

    observed when comparing percentages developed in different

    -9

  • test periods even when these periods varied considerab1y in

    duration of time. For example, a three-day check made in the

    Spring of 1960 produced essentially the same results as one

    made for the entire month of October 1959.

    Approximate1y three percent of system express

    revenue is earned by local operations. There are, of course,

    certain expenses attached to the handling of express which

    must follow any allocation of express revenue. In order to

    simplify the a11ocation procedures, no express revenue or

    offsetting expenses are charged to local operations. This

    procedure has the effect of understating the net income of

    local operations; such understatement is considered negligible

    in view of the fact that analyses show that the cost of

    handling an express shipment is approximately the same as the

    average revenue received per local shipment. This method does

    not impair the accuracy of total intrastate and state results

    of operations due to the fact that local express revenues and

    expenses are assigned to applicab1e mainline intrastate

    operations.

    Q Q e

    -10

  • BUS MILE EXPENSES

    More than 60 percent of Western Greyhound's ex

    penses are directly related to bus miles operated. Through

    the media of company records or special studies the major part of these expenses can be identified with the operation

    of particular buses or routes. It is, therefore, not too

    difficult to isolate bus mile expenses to the various s ta tes

    even th ough the operational routes in the case of mainline

    operations may cross several state borders. Since all local

    operations of the company occur entirely within pa rticular

    states, they are easily separable to the various states in

    volved. The main allocation problem arises wh en expenses

    pertaining to mainline operations must be allocated to the

    intrastate and interstate traffic that is handled in c ommon

    by those operations within or into a given sta te. (From a practical standpoint, this same problem does not exist on

    local operations due to the fact that these operations are

    in excess of 99 percent intrastate and,therefore, are con

    sider~d for allocation purposes to be 100 percent intrastate. No appreciable distortion results from this procedure as both

    revenues and expenses are treated in the same manner.) If there were no differences in the characteristics of intra

    state and interstate traffic, the actual use of common bus

    miles could be based on the passenger miles ,of each type of

    traffic. However, research in the matter of r elative use of

    bus miles by intrastate and in t erstate traffic reveals very

    definite differences in load fa ctor characteristics. The

    assembled data show very clearly that on the overall the

    -11

  • number of bus miles required to produce 1,000 passenger miles

    is greater for short-ride passengers than for long-ride

    passengers indicating a lower average load factor for the

    short-ride than for the long-ride passenger. Statistics for

    the State of California show that the average ride of inter

    sta te mainline passengers is about three times as long as the

    average ride of intrastate passengers. These facts lead to

    the conclusion that the allocation of ex) enses should be made on the basis of relative use rather than actual use. A dis

    cussion of the method of providing for this relative use,as

    well as differences in bus mile costs resulting from assign

    ment of different types of motor coaches to the various serv

    ices, follows.

    The 6peration of Western Greyhound Lines is divided

    into units known as divisions. (See Map - Page 13). These divisions are set up primarily for operating purposes with

    very few statistics usable for allocation purposes maintained

    by divisions. The company's smallest unit of operation is

    the bus tripe The next largest unit is the zone, which is a

    collection of all the through and turnback bus trips of a

    given natu~e, (e.g., general service, express service, etc.) operating between two termini on the system. For example,

    all of the express bus trips operated between San Francisco

    and Los Angeles via the San Joaquin Valley route are known as

    the Zone 155 operation. General statistics are maintained

    for sorne 160 operating zones and ar e develo ped or discussed

    elsewhere in the reporto After a careful analysis made by

    Commission engineers and company personnel, the operating

    zones have been formed into homogeneous groupings to

    -12

  • -----

    "

    -

    I I

    --------- /

    SAN F

    s S. F. MARIN 1} S. F. PENINSULA LOCAL OP ERA TIONS IN DIVISION 5

    WESTERN GREYHOUND

    LINES

    OPERATING DIVISIONS

    , I /I , (/ -------~/,~ .

    ,': ~ '

    I

    8AJJ,

    I I

    ---.- -

    ------__ I---__ I

    -----------I --

    1 2 I , AlBUQUERQUE

    LAS CRUCES

    -- ---

    ,EL PASO

    LITHO IN U . S A13

  • facilita te the processing of the data necessary to allocate

    bus mile expenses generated by the various zone operations.

    Eighteen mainline and ten local zone groups were established

    based on the follawing criteria:

    l. General service area,

    2. Characteristics of service (e.g.~ interstate, intrastate, local),

    3. Drivers' wages in cents per bus mile,

    4. Load factors,

    5. Equipment used.

    About 1,500 motor coaches of various ages and types

    are used by the company; they also have been classified into

    homogeneous groups to facilitate allocation procedures. The

    follo vdng criteria were used to establish motor coach groups:

    l. Year model,

    2. Type (e.g., transit, mainline, scenicruiser), 3. Maintenance cost,

    4. Fuel consumption,

    5. Miles operated per year.

    In establishing the zone groups and bus group~ no

    particular criterion was given preferential weight bu~ rathe~

    all were considered for overall effect. A completelisting of

    zones and zone grou0s and motor coaches and motor coach groups

    is set forth on Pages 23-29.

    Once established, the zone groups and bus groups

    provide a ready means of determining, for a particular period,

    the bus miles operated by the several bus groups over the

    various zone operations contained in the zone groups. As

    discussed elsewhere in the report, each driver turns in a

    -14

  • trip r eport at t he end of each of his runs. Directly or

    indirectly, this r eport contains, amo ng other t hings, the

    bus operated, t he bus miles operated and the origin and des

    tina t ion of the dr i ver's tripa From this informat i on, the

    bus miles by bus group by zone group by state may be deter

    mi ned. It would be impr actical to analyze all of the drivers!

    trips fo r saya year pe riod a nd , therefore, s orn e contro l l ed

    sampling procedure must be used. For the year ended

    September 30, 1960, sample s were taken for the month of

    November 1959 and Se ptember 1960. The complete samp le t o

    ta led about 125,000 driver trips which is about 12 pe rcent

    of the total fo r the year. Using data processing proc edures ,

    the sample was reduced to a perc entage s pread of bus miles by

    bus groups for each zone group fo r both system and California

    operations. The rsult is shown in Column 7 of Table 1,

    Page 17. To explai n further~ Column 7 indicates that 1.5

    pe rcent of the system bus miles for Zone Group 1 were oper

    ated by equipment assigned to Bus Group 1, 14.8 percent by

    Bus Group 2 , etc. The lower ha lf of the same column indicate s

    that of t he bus mi les ope rated in California 2.0 percent were

    operatad by Bus Group 19 17.1 percent by Bus Group 2, etc.

    Once t he relationship of the bus miles operated by

    t he various bus groups in Zone Group 1 has been es t ablished,

    the avera ge per mile cost f or a particular account is deter

    mined . This is done by re lat ing the actual cost per bus mile

    f or the ye ar to the percentage spread by bus type. As an

    example , thi s process i s shown in Ta ble 1 for Account s 4141

    ana 4142, Equipment Ma intena nce Expe Lse. As developed in

    Column 8, tlle average maintenance expense fer al l bus miles operated in Zone Group 1 is 3.60~. Similarly, t he bus ~~les

    - 15

  • op erated in Ca lifornia average 3.644. Data processing pro

    cedures are used to complete this process for each of the 28

    zone groups. The average system and California bus mile costs

    are then applied to the actual zone group bus miles for the

    year as shown in Table 11, page 18. This calculation pro

    duces the maintenance expense for each zone group as shown

    in Column 4, Table 11. Because the bu s mile distribution

    sample is not perfeet, the expense distributed to the zone

    groups does not balance exactly to the ledger, being in

    error by about 2.6 percent. The distributed Californi a

    expense in Column 7 is corrected by the factor 1.02612 to

    produce Column 8 which then becomes comparable to the total

    system expense of $5,076,987 as recorded on the company's 1edger and stands as the maintenance expense for operating

    zone groups within the State of California; the remaining step

    in the procedur e is to allocate the California expense t o the

    intrastate and interstate traffie of each zone gro~p. At

    t his point, it beeomes necessary to aceount for the previously

    discussed differenees in traffic charaeteristie s . This is

    done by developing the equivalent passenger mile percents

    sho\vn in Column 9 of Table 11. The follovving diseussion of

    the method of developing these equivalent passenger mile

    percentages pertain to mainline operations only, since the

    California local zone groups are considered to be . 100 pereent

    intrastate.

    From zone statisties for the year ended September 3q 1960, the bus miles per 1,OOO.passengermiles and the average

    -16

  • - - -

    TABLE 1

    ACCCUl\JTS h141 & 4142 - lVIAINTENANCE OF EQUIPiviENT

    SYSTEi'V AND CALIFORl'JIA AV.c;RAGE COST PER BUS 1VIILE

    ZONE GROUP 1 - YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER JO, 1960

    :A/C l4J., 42:

    :Maintenance

    :Expense Per .. ..

    Bus : Bus i~ri1e :Nov. 1959: :Sep. 1960:

    :Group:Year Ended Samp1e Samp1e ; No. : 9-30-60 IvriJ.e s Niles - 71 ) (2) (3) ( ),'"

    Syste:n1 4.42~ 6,517 1.8% 11,405 1.2% 1.5% Summary 2 4.73 4,910 1.4 270,,470 28 0 2 14.8 of the 3 4,,16 9,744 2.8 8~306 0 0 9 1.9 Line 4 By

    ~ :; 3.16 2,531 0~7 7,432 0.8 0,8 Line 6 2.72 66 Products 7 3. 80 10,152 2.9 58,214 6.1 4.5 of 8 2.76 30,401 80 6 75,983 7.9 8.3 Columns 9 2.10 61,784 17.5 102,900 10.7 14.1 (2) & (7 ) le 4.92 77,717 22.0 13,290 1.4 1107

    11 3.84 149,185 42.3 313,126 32.5 37.2 J.2 0.56 98 ,388 10e3 ~

    --'

    Tote,l S:fste!T:., 352,941 100.0% 959,580 100.0% 100.0% J.6oi California

    --r-4.. 42~ 5,160 2.2% 10,714 1. 7% 2.0%

    r , 4073 3,492 1.5 206,691 32.7 17.1 Summary )

    ~

    4.16 7) 215 3.1 352 0~1 1.6 oi: the 4- Line 5 3. 16 2,531 1.1 7,401 1.2 1. 2 By 6 2.72 Line 7 3.80 7,h18 3.2 45,796 7.3 5.3 Products 8 2.76 20,535 8.9 52,986 8,, 4 8.7 of 9 2.10 43,535 18.9 43,453 6,,9 12.9 Co J.umns

    10 4.92 47,513 20.7 7,571 12 n.o (2) & (7)")5300 8 -:n 3.84 92,648 40.4 193 J 973 ~ o .......

    12 0.56 61., 055 9.7 ..J.~9 Total California 230,,047 100.0% 629, 992 100.0% 100,,0% .}.!6)~

    - 17

  • 11

    ACOOUNTS 4141 ANO 4142 - MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT YEAR ENOEO SEPTEMBER 30, 1960

    SYSTEM - CALIFO RNI A - CALIFORNIA INTRASTATE

    ro

    -i (") ::o l> l> r Z (J)"T1

    0-u0::0 ::o ~ -i l> l> ::! -u OC z ID

    r 0(") < C -(J) -i -r-

    _

    0Z:;! I m

    (J)

    ~ (") ::o O - ~ r ~ 01 -

    CAL IFO RNI A SYSTEM CAL IFORN IA IN TRASTA TE

    WE IGHTED WEIGHTED CAL IFORN I A AV ERAGE Bus MILES AV ERAGE Bus MI LES ADJUS T To INTRASTATE

    MAI NTENANCE OPERATED OISTRIBUTED MAINTENANCE OP ERA TED OI STRIBUTED LEDGER EQU IV ALEN T ALL OCATED ZON E EXP ENSE FOR YEAR ENDED MAINT ENANC E PASSENGE R MAINT ENA NCE GROUP

    EXP ENSE FOR YEAR ENDED MA INTENANCE COL . (7)ZONE GROU P SEP .30,1960 EXPENSE ZO NE GROUP SEP .30 , 1960 EXP ENSE X 1. 02612* MIL E PERCENT EXPENSE

    (1) (2 ) (3) (4 ) (5) (6) (7) (8 ) (9) ( 10 )

    1 3 .60, 10 ,806 ,763 $ 389-,04 3 .64, 6, 989 ,642 $ 254 , 42~ $ 26 1, 000 ~ .1% $ 1~ , 800 2 2.83 3 , ~9 , 502 94,50 2 .83 3 ,339 '{)12 94 , 50 9 ' 000 .6 ,000 3 3 .31 4 , 5, 17~ 161,368 3 . '22 2,376 , 2 76 ,535 7 , 500 27 .6 21,700

    g 4 4.41 1, 596 ,69 70 ,414 4 } 773 ,240 33 ,791 34 ,700 23 .6 8 ,200r3.61 16 ,459 ,034 594, 171 3 . 1 16 ,459 ,034 594 , 17 1 609 ,700 87 .3 532 ,300

    3 .43 3 ,1 % ,070 107 ,910 3 .21 11 ,23 1 ,860 360, 543 -

    3 . 15 2, 171, 277 68 ,39') 2 .49 324 ,315 8 ,075 8,300 0 .9 100 9 3 .81 7 ,408 ,261 282 ,2~ 3 . 50 3 ,249 ,300 113 ,726 116,700 22 .9 26 ,700

    10 2,49 1, 049 83 ,9 3.41 2,413 ,380 82 ,296 84- ,400 91 '2 77 ,0003 . ~711 2 . 3 2 ,633 ,514 74, 528 2.87 1,689 ,970 48,502 49,800 67 .3 33 ,500 12 3 .61 6 ,415 ,1 51 2~1, 587 3 .61 6,415,1 51 237 ,600 23 1, 20023 1, 8~ 97 . 13 3 .47 7 ,609 ,618 2 4 ,054 3 .23 119 , 1 123 ,000 22 . 28 ,000~ , 709 , 27 14 4.1 2 21, 041, 468 866 ,908 4 . 14 ,620 , 77 274 , 104 281,300 20 .2 56 ,800 15 3 .60 8,511, 419 306 ,41 1 3 .60 8 ,511,419 306 ,411 314,400 93 .6 294,300 16 2.84- 730 ,862 - - - 20 ,~

    3 . 57 4 ,254 , 576 151 , 3 . 58 3 ,825, 548 136,955 140, 500 27 .3 38 ,400 ; 3 .91 7 , 552,14~ 4 .07 2 J 5 , ~9.5 221.400 87 .4 1 96 '~00TOTAL MAINLI NE 122 ,274 ,43 ~~~:~~t 71 : ~ :~ $2 , 590 , 97 $2 ,658 ,300 $1.75 . 00 51 3 .7g, 1, 2i2,034 $ 46 ,694 - , $ $ - % $

    "-' , 00352 3 0 1 ~ ' 511 - - - - 53 3 .86 72 ,038 2 ,025 3 .86 726 ,038 28 , 025 28 ,800 100 .0 28 ,800 54 4.62 1,616,427 74 67 4.62 1,616,427 74 , 67~ 76 ,600 100 .0 76 ,600,4 .29 2,m ,822 111, 01 4 .29 2 ,587,822 111 ,01 11 3 ,900 100 .0 113 , 900~g 3 .46 4 , 5.8,394 167, 616 3 .46 4 ,844 ,394 167 ,616 172 ,000 100.0 172 ,000

    2.79 2 ,~ 7,200 2.79 258 ,~ 7,200 7,400 100 .0 7 ,400~ 1,166, 44,225 1,166 , 44 ,225 45 ,400 100.0 45 ,4003 '9 3 ' 9 3 . 3 6~0 , 28 1, 24 ,1 40 3 . 3 630 ,281 24 ,140 24 ,800 100 .0 24 ,800g6 3 . 93 ~ 5, 559. 15, 1 ~2 3 .91 3~. 508 13,861 14,200 100 .0 14, 200 TOTAL LOCAL 13, 11, 009 $ 523 ,7 2 12,1 ,413 $ 470,764 $ 483 ,1 00 $ 483 ,1 00 TOTAL SYSTEM 135,885,444 $4 ,947 ,728 84- ,1 84- ,280 $3 ,06 1, 461 tl.Jf!-1 ,400 $2 ,239 ,600 TOTAL LEDG ER $5 , 076 ,987 I~

    ~ ~

    (/) -(/)

  • length of ride of each passenger is determined fo r al1 o the

    72 mainline zones operated in California; a graphical plot of

    this data is shown on Chart A, Page 22. Al so shown on the

    chart is a weighted curve determined from the general equation b

    Y=aX + c. The San Francisco office of the Service Bureau

    Corporation* was retained by IJestern Greyhound Lines to assist

    the Commission staff in developing a reliable equation to

    represent the data. The purpose of the curve is to determine

    the relative number of bus miles needed to serve 1,000

    passenger miles for various given lengths of ride. Again using

    Zone Group 1 as an example, the bus miles assignable to inter

    state and intrastate traffic from zone group statistics and

    Chart A are developed as set forth in the following table:

    ---_ ._-

    Zone Group I - California Operations Only TABLE III

    T~e of Passenger Item : Intrast8.te: Interst ate,: Total Zon~

    (1) (2) (3) (1) Average Length of Ride - Miles 199 698 369 (2) Bus Yles Per 1,000 Passenger

    Miles - Chart A 40.2 33.3 36.3

    (3) Actual B12S Miles Per 1,000 Passenger Miles - 35.3 Year Ended 9-30-60 I I (4) Relative Bus Miles Per 1,000 IPassenger Miles 39.1 32.4 35.3 iL' (2) l2.:) IJ.ne x 36.3

    I (5) Actual Passenger Miles (000) I Year Ended 9-30-60 91,967 110,62l 202,588 I

    I(6) Equivalent Bus I~les IYear Ended 9-30-60 ],595,910 3,584,120 7,180,030 I Line (4) x Line (5) I I

    (7) Equivalent Bus Miles-Percent 21% 49.9% 100.0% J * A subsidiary of International Business Machines 1 Ine .

    .. 19

  • The 50.1 percent shown on Line 7 of Table 111 i s

    applied to Zone Group 1, and allocates to California intrastate

    traffic $130,800 of the $261,000 total California expense.

    The relative expense per passenger mile for the two types of

    traffic then becomes:

    For intrastate: $130,800 = 0.142 ~/Psgr. mile91,967,000 For interstate: $130,200 118 ~/p 9 mile110,621,000 = . ~ s r. Comparing the results shows the expense al10cated

    per passenger mile for intrastate to be 20.3 percent higher

    than for interstate. Of course, this also is the relationship

    of the figures 40.2 and 33.3 from Chart A and shown on

    Table 111.

    In actual practice it becomes more convenient to

    calculate equivalent passenger miles. Using length of ride,

    passenger miles and Chart A, the calculation for Zone Group 1

    is developed as set forth in the following table~

    TABLE IV :Chart A Equivalent :Adjustment:Passenger Mile Percents

    Percent Factor -Unadjusted Ad,justed 40 .2 Intrastat e 91,967 45.4% 50.3% 50.1%x 3b.3 = 33.3 =Interstate 110,621 54.6% x 50.1% 49.9% 36.3 I

    Total Zone 202,588 100.0% 100.4% 100.0% J._~-_._--. ~_._----

    The foregoing procedures are followed for each o

    the rnainline 'Zone groups operating in California and~ with

    - 20

  • the minor exceptions as

    used for the fo11owing

    and 4142:

    Account 4160

    Account 4220

    Account 4230

    Account 4240

    Account 5021

    Account 5211

    Account 5212

    Account 5220

    Account 5232

    Account 1221

    Account 2521

    noted in the fo11owing text, are

    accounts in addition to Accounts 4141

    - Tires and Tubes - Revenue Equipment

    - 0river~f Wages and Bonuses

    - Fuel for Revenue Equipment

    - Oil for Revenue Equipment

    - Depreciation of Revenue Equipment

    - State, City Tax - Fuel

    - Federal Excise Tax - Fuel and Oil

    - Vehicle License and Registration Fees

    - Personal Property Ta xes - Buses

    - Investment - Revenue Equipment

    - Reserve - Revenue Equipment

    o e o

    - 21

  • -------------- ------

    eHA RT A

    180 ~---'--------'---'-----'-------'--IIr------rI------'-I -'--1 ~I --, WESTERN GREYHOUND LINES 170~--~-----+-----r----~----+-- -

    CALIFORNIA ZONE OPERATIONS 160 I----o--r\_--+ __f--_ +--_-I_ __+_- Y E A R E N oEo S E P T E M B E R 3 oI I 96 o-

    150 ~--~-----+----_r----1_----+_----r_--~----_+----_+----_r----+_--~

    140~---4----_+----~----4_----+_----~--_4----_+----_+----~----+_--~

    ~ 130 ~---4----_+----~----4_----+_----~--_4----_+----_+----~----+_--~ w -'

    120~--~-----+----_r----1_----+_----r_--~----_+----_+----_r----+_--~ Q:: W C>

    ~ ~

    1I0~---j----_+----_+----~----+_----~----~--~----_+----~----4_--~ c:[

    ~

    CL

    100~--_4----_+----_+----~----+_----~--~~--~----_+----~----4_--~ o :z c:[

    ~ 90~--~~--_+-----+----_r----+_----r_--~~--_+----_+----_r----+_--~ o :x: 1

    80~~_4----_+-----+----~----+_----r_--~r_--_+----_+----~----+_--~ Q:: W CL

    \ o ~

    :=1

    ~ ::::>

    ce

    70 ~4__4~--_+-----+----~----+_----r_--~~--_+----_+----~----+_--~

    \: :" WElGHTEO CURVE EQUATIO. 6o ~----\-r-l\ . ~..o--+-----~---4-----+-----+----~~ y = 2 2 I X - 05 16 +2 5 _ 8 -

    " x - AVERAGE LENGTH OF RIDE o o, o o o o FOR ALL ZONE PASSENGERS_

    5o~---o4-~",---t.o,-"----+-'oro-o --t-----+--o -r-----r----1 y _ B U S M I LES oPE R A TE D PE R -

    : o o~:.... o o 0 0 1,000 PASSENGER MILES _, 40r-----t---..r+--~-+1--~~oH_~~+_--~rL-O --_r----+_~.o_+----_r----~ -~T:o:-r_-t--~/--+-~o~_J~Uo

    30~---4----_+----~----4_----+_----~--~~--_+----_+----_r----+_--____j

    20~---4----_+----~----4_----+_----~--~----_+----_+----~----+_--~

    10~---4----_+----~----4_----+_----r_--_4----_+-----_+----~----+_--~

    O~--~----~----~----~----~----~--~~--~----~----~----~--~ o 50 100 150 200 250

    LENGTH OF 300 350

    R I D E 400

    MIL E S 450 500 550 600

    WKC CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTllITIES COMMISSION - 22

    TRANSPORTAT ION DIVISION - APR IL 5,196 1

  • Table V Sheet l of 4

    MAINLINE ZONE GROUPS

    Zone Group l San Diego-Los Angeles-Seattle

    .' Zone 102 San Diego-Los Angeles-Seattle (Express) , I lone 105 Los Angeles-Portland-Seattle

    lone Group 2 Los Angeles-Sacramento-Redding

    lone 107 Los Angeles-Redding

    lone 111 Los Angeles-Sacramento (Express)

    Zone 113 Los Angeles-Sacramento

    lone Group 3 San Francisco-Portland-Seattle

    Zone 116 San Francisco-Seattle (Express)

    lone 118 San Francisco-Portland-Seattl e

    lone 120 San Francisco-Klamath Falls

    lone Group 4 San Francisco-Southwest ., t. IZone 140 San Francisco-Bakersfield (

    lone 141 Barstow-Albuquerque

    lone Group 5 San Francisco-Los Angeles-San Diego

    lone 142 San Francisco-Los Angeles-San Diego (Coast Express) "

    lone 146 San Francisco-Los Angeles (Coast) J lone 149 San Francisco-Los Angeles (Coast Ltd. Surcharge

    Service)l one 155 San Francisco-Los Angeles (Valley Express) lone 159 San Francisco-Los Angeles (Valley) .

    ,

    J

    .

    "

    I I

    l'

    Zone 162 San Francisco-Tulare

    l one Group 6 Portland-Seatt1e-Vancouver, B.C. .. F l' h .. ' .1 tio ::' '7 C?

    O lone 275 Seattle-Vancouver '

    lone 277 Seatt1e-Bel1ingham t t. ; \,.." '1- p t' I

    o lone 281 Seattle-Port1and I lone 284 Seattle-Olympia

    P lone 2a8 Seattle-Port Angeles ~....l ! e':,

    - 23 / '

  • Table V Sheet 2 o 4

    MAINLINE ZONE GROUPS

    Zone Group 7 Washington-Idaho-Montana Mainline ? r/- Zone 121 The Oa11es-Spokane ~ ~;:

    1 lone 170 Seatt1e-Butte I T,

    Zene 172 Seattle-Spokane J Zone 180 Portland-Salt Lake City Zone 184 Twin Fal1s-Pocatello

    f Zone 291 Spokane-Wallace

    P Zone 293 Seattle- t ewiston r ,

    Zone 296 Wenatchee-International Boundary

    >' Zone 297 Spokane-Trail

    , 1 1'1P Zone 299 Spokane-Creston v .

    p Zone 301 Spokane-Portland .. -// . " - 1", .r.- " < Zone 303 Spokane-Umatilla-Portland

    ;o Zone 304 Spokane-Pendleton H... -, ,"

    ! Zone 308 El1ensburg-George I \..c ,.

    P Zone 310 Sa1t Lake City-Idaho Fa11s-Ashton

    Zone 315 Deer Lodge~Helena-Ashtonr f I J ,.;.,; - )

    ZOAe Group 8 Oregon Mainline

    Zone 130 Port1and-Klamath Fal1s-Reno ., Zone 321 Port1and-Seaside

    Zone 323 Port1and-Astoria (Columb i a River)

    Zone 324 Port1and-St. Helens

    Zone 326 Portland-Seaside-Astoria (Sunset Highway)

    Zone 329 Corva11is-Newport

    Zone 331 Port1and-Myrtle Point

    ~ Zone 332 Portland-Eugene-Reedsport ~ Zone 334 Portland-Salem

    lone 336 Port1and-Eugene-Cottage Grove

    Zone 338 Crescent City-Medford

    Zone 339 Klamath Falls-Medford

    Zone Group 9 San Francisco-Reno-Rock Springs, Wyoming

    Zone 190 San Francisco-Rock Springs

    /( Zone 200 San Francisco- l.:Vinnemucca-Wells

    '" Zone 202 San Francisco-Reno

    Zone Group 10 San Francisco-Sacramento Area l' Zone 204 San Francisco-Reno-Squaw Va11ey

    Zone 206 San Francisco-Nevada CityZone 351 Sacramento-Placervi11e Zone 353 San Francisco-Tahoe-Reno lone 354 San Francisco-Sacramento (Express)

    '. Zone 358 San Francisco-Sacramento (Local)

    Zone 361 San Francisco-Oroville-Reno

    - , 24

  • Table V Sheet 3 of 4

    MAINLINE ZONE GROUPS

    Zone Group 11 Redwood Empire

    Zone 133 San Francisco-Portland (Redwood)

    Zone 135 San Francisco-Eureka

    Zone Group 12 Other California Mainline

    Zone 136 San Francisco-Willits

    " Zone 137 San Francisce-Ukiah (Express) ,

    ~ .1

    -.

    Zone 151 San Jose-'3'a1inas . _, ," Zone 152 Los Angeles-Santa Barbara

    S Zone 371 San Francisco-Santa Rosa ~

    Zone 379 San Francisco-Fort Bragg

    Zone 381 Santa Rosa-Monte Rie

    .

  • I

    Table V Sheet 4 of 4

    MAINLINE ZONE GROUPS

    Zone Grou:Q 14 Los Angeles-San Diego-Southwest /'1 Zone 230 Los Angeles-Albuquerque ') \ ~ :;/'1 Zone 240 San Diego-Albuquerque (Exp~e.s. )

    ,\.-, Zone 242 San Diego-Flagstaff /'. Zone 250 Los Angeles-El Paso

    Zone 2.60 San Diego-El Paso r ,. Zone 262 Los Angeles-Tucson (Express)

    Zone GrouQ 15 Los Angeles-South V

    'v

    V v

    ~ ,

    Zone V\'

    \ \ \'1.'

    Zone y \( ',,

    >/

    , '-,

    "

    ~

    ' .......

    >( " Zone

    Zone 465 Los Angeles-Calexico

    Zone 471 Santa Monica-Palm Springs /. ,.>o',c , Zone 474 Los Angeles-San Diego (Express)

    Zone 479 Los Angeles-Port of Entry (Express)

    Zone 482 Los Angeles-San Diego

    Zone 491 Los Angeles-San Diego (Inland)

    -4.~-4 L oY" Z ,,'-' (l r J - ~ r\ 11 .!':. , ~ L .... . J . GrouQ 16 Arizona Miscellaneous

    --/ 1_" Zone 495 Phoenix-Tucson '( , Zone 498 Tucson-Douglas

    Group 17 Guaranteed and Special Operations SI' ~. .... {., .._1"' r -r

    .E ~, "'01 ..: ('-I"t-,.I Zone 501 Guaranteed Operations-SouthernZone 509 Escorted Tours Zone 511 Harrahs Club Zone 512 Growers Farm Labor Zone 513 MilitaryZone 514 Nevada LodgeZone 515 Snow SpecialsZone 517 Carson City-Nugget Club Zone 519 Ot her /"

    .S' Y I Ctl. /- No \. I ',....'-I"'l...? 1--1, ,.. j, ' ' Group 18 Charter Operations

    /

    7 J

    Military and Government Migrant Labor Rail 5ubstitution School Contracts Extended Tours Etc.

    Pacific Company

    - 26

  • Table VI Sheet 1 of 2

    LOC-\L ZONE GkOUPS

    d Zone 618 Seatt1e-Everett ~ Zone 622 Seattle-Auburn ~ Zone 627 Seatt1e-Tacoma

    Zone 636 Port1and~Forest Grove

    Zone 645 Port1and-McMinnville

    ZOD&~~O~D 53 East Bay :.~ Zone 650 San Francisco-Vallejo-Napa

    y Zone 654 San Francisco-Vallejo (Express)

    ? Zone 656 Oakland-Va1lejo

  • Table VI Sheet 2 of 2

    Zone GrouuLJ=ong Beach

    E.. Zone 900 Long Bea eh-Santa .iloniea

    Zon~Gro~Q 58 San Die99.

    F E

    Zone Zone

    906 San Diego-Mexican Border 922 Niland-Calexico

    1.;. Zone 926 San Diego-;iramar

    zonLrou\) 59 iAi li tary ~ Zone 944 Fort Ord Army Base

    ~ Zone 948 Travis Air Force Base-San Francisco Airport

    u Zone 969 Oakland-Bay Meadows \,,, Zone 971 San Francisco-Bay i. ieadows e Zone 976 San Bernardino-San Ysidro

    o O 1).

    - 28

  • --

    ---

    TABLE VII

    MOTOR COACH GROUPS

    -GrOup .. .. No. :Year Mode1L_Coach ~ode.L Seats : Uni ts (l L. 1 1947 GMC - PD 3751 37 106 2 1948 GMC - PD 3751 37 52 3 1942 GMC - PO 4151 37 & 41 163 4 1947 ACF - LC. 41 37 5 1951, 1952 GMC - PD 4103 37 & 39 161 6 1954 GMC - PD 4103 41 3 7 1953, 1954 GMC - PD 4104 39 193 8 1957 GMC - PD 4104 39 74 9 1958 GMC - PD 4104 38 125

    10 1954, 1955 GMC - PD 4501 43 15@ 11 1956 GMC - PO 4501 43 73 12 1960 GMC - PD 4104 38 76

    SUBTOTAL (2 ) 1,176

    51 1940, 1941 GMC - TD 4502 45 39 52 1945 GMC - TD 4506 45 59 53 1951 GMC - TDM 5103 49 & 53 37 54 1952 GMC - TOM 4509 41 3 55 1954 m'lC - TDivl 4515 41 15 56 1955 GMC - TOM 4515 45 15 57 1954 GMC - TOM 4801 50 75 58 1957 MACK - C - 49 51 30 59 1947 Gj\.1C - PO 3751 37 7 60 1948 GMC - PO 3751 37 23 61 1948 GMC - PO 4151 41 55

    SUBTOTAL (3 ) 358 TOTAL 1,534

    Units owned by Western Gr eyhound Lines - March 31, 1960. Primari1y used in Main1ine Service.~l Primari1y used in Local Service.

    - 29

  • ACCOUNT 4143 - REVENUE EQUIPMENT. ACCIDENT REPAIR There are no accident repair cost statistics which

    would show how much expense of this nature is incurred in the

    different divisions. There are, however, data available by

    division of buses damaged. Analysis indicates no reliable

    correlation between public liability and property damage

    expense and number of buses damaged in a particular division.

    For example, in Division 5 during the year 1954*, there were

    11 buses damaged per million miles and th e cost for PL & PD

    was 1.784 cents per mile. In Division 2 during the same

    period, 1.6 buses were damaged per million miles and the PL

    & PD expense was .766 cents per mile. These data show that buses damaged for like amounts of bus miles were 6.9 times

    greater in Division 5 than in Division 2 but the ratio of PL

    & PD costs per mile between the two divisions was only 2.3 to l. This indicates, as might be expected, that the frequency

    of accidents is much greater in Division 5 due to its metro

    politan area location than in Division 2, but that the

    severity is greater in the latter due to the higher average

    operating speeds encountered in desert service.

    It would seem logical that the greater the damage

    occurring to a bus in an accident, the greater the PL & PD

    expense that would resulto Wh ile for a particular accident

    it would not be possible to estimate accurately the PL & PD expense from just the amount of bus repair expense that resulted, it is believed that the two expenses are roughly

    *This may seem to be remote information; however, it was the last ycar available in which all outstanding claims had been settled.

    -30

  • proportional. That is to say, when the cost of PL & PD is $3,000 per collision the cost of repairing a damaged bus is approximately 3 times as great as when the cost of PL & PD is only $1,000 per collision.

    One statistic that is available and becomes useful

    in designing the allocation procedure for this account is

    that of accident repair expense by type of coach. This allows

    an expedient method of determining repair cost applicable to

    local and mainline operations. Ihis is done by making a

    special analysis of company records and in the case of local

    operations final allocations t~ zone groups can be made on

    the basis of bus miles.

    For main1ine operations the allocation is based on

    Account 4531, Public Liability and Property Damage Expense.

    In the absence of any sound statistical evidence this method

    is based on the informed judgment of the Commission staff and company personnel.

    e o 0

    -31

  • ACCOUNT 4151 - SERVICING REVENUE EQUIPMENT - LUBRICATION

    All of the various types of motor coaches

    operated by Western Gr~hound Lines are on the same mileage

    schedule for lubrication service. Ihe current schedule is

    lubrication service for each bus at 2,500 mile intervals.

    Investigation into the cost of lubricating the various types

    revealed that no appreciable difference in cost per

    lubrication exists between the most luxurious type of coach

    such as the Scenicruiser model and the more simplified

    type such as the local transito For these reasons an

    equitable allocation of lubrication expense can be made on

    the basis of bus miles with equivalent passenger miles used

    to allocate intrastate mainline expenses from total state

    mainline expense.

    o 0 e

    - 32

  • ACCOUNT 4152 - SERVICING RgVENUE EQUIPMENT WASHING ANO CLEANING

    The majority of the expense incurred in this account results from the routine washing and cleaning of

    buses for appearance purposes in their daily operation.

    The remainder constitutes expense of thorough cleaning,

    deodorizing, and disinfecting of bus interiors plus

    periodic steam cleaning of motors and chassis.

    A study of methods of properly allocating the

    expenses of this account was made in 1953 by the Stanford Research Institute of Menlo Park, California. The results

    of this study show that washing and cleaning tends to

    increase per bus mile as the round trip mileage of buses

    decreases. This difference is more clearly evident when

    comparisons are made between local and mainline operations

    than when comparisons are made between different mainline

    operations. The comparisons made between different mainline

    operations give no clear answer to variation in expense due

    to the fact that it is difficult to determine the expense

    incident to "sweepouts" and window washings of buses making

    long continuous trips.

    In the final analysis, a reasonable allocation

    procedure is to develop the expense for local operations

    separately from mainline operations and then allocate each

    of these to the respective state and intrastate operations

    on the basis of bus miles. This procedure may ha ve a

    tendency to understate to a minor degree the expense for

    - 33

  • intrastate mainline operations but the practical application

    of the method is judged to outweigh this minor distortion. Based on a special analysis, the local bus miles are assigned

    2Y times the expense of a mainline bus mile to accomplish

    the allocation of system expense to local transit buses and

    mainline buses.

    - 34

  • ACCOUNT 4211 - SUPERVISION OF TRANSPORTATION

    Supervision expense by operating divisions is

    readily available from records maintained by the company and

    when related to recorded division bus miles produce expense

    per bus mile by division. From this process, an average cost

    per mile for California mainline and local operations can

    be determined which reasonably reflects operations therein

    even though certain California divisions share division

    territory with other states. (See Map, Page 13.) Divisions operating entirely or partially in California are 1, 2, 3,

    4, 5, 6 and 7; Division 5 comprises the major local operations in and around the San Francisco Bay Area. As can be seen

    from the division map, the mainline operations in California

    are conducted for the most part in Divisions 3, 4, and 6.

    After considering all factors, the weighted average expense

    per bus mile for these divisions is concluded to be the

    average expense for all California mainline bus miles. The

    allocation to California intrastate is accomplished on the

    basis of the relation of intrastate mainline equivalent

    passenger miles to total California mainline passenger miles.

    For local operations, the expense per mile for

    Division 5 is used for those operations primarily of a

    transit or commute nature with certain other local operations

    (Military and San Jose Express) being assigned the cost per bus mile developed for Division 4 which is the highest cost

    mainline division operating in California.

    I11ustrating from the summary developed for the

    year ended September 30, 1960, the expense for California

    - 35

  • is developed in the following manner:

    Account 4211 Division No. 4/BM

    1 0.99~

    2 0.47

    3 0.92) Weighted average ) of these three 4 (1) 1.07~ divisions used for

    California main6 0.89) line bus miles. 7 1.06

    8 1.30

    5 (2) 2.96

    (1) Used for Zone Group 59 and Zone 870. (2) Used for all California local operations except those

    in Footnote (1).

    - 36

  • ACCOUNT 4220 - DRIVERS ' WAGES

    Account 4220 is essentially treated in the s am e

    manner as other bus mile expenses; this method is discussed

    under Bus Mile EXRenses beginning on Page 11. However, the

    development of the average cost for each zone group is

    accomplished in a di f ferent manner t han is shown in Table 1,

    Page 17. Unlike bus mile expenses such as maintenance of

    ~quipment9 drivers' wages are determined by the ope rating

    characteristics of iones rather than operating character

    istics of zones and types of motor coaches operated. It

    becomes necessary, therefore, te establish the relative

    drivers' wa ges by zones and translate this to average ce st

    by zone group to complete the equivalent passenger mile

    allocation procedure. A comp lete study of dr ivers' wages by

    zones was completed for the month of October 1959; studies

    show that October is a reliable month to establish the

    re pr esentative va riation which obtains between zones for

    drivers' wages for a full year periodo Ana lyses also produce

    posi tive evidence that this relativity does not ch ange even

    though drivers' I:'iage rate s change fr om period to period i this

    f act obviates the necessity of frequent drivers' wage chec ks

    which are costly and time consuming to accomplish. (From time to time, special checks must be made to adjust the expense for zones which undergo operational changes affecting

    drivers' wages.) Once the relative zone cost per bus mile is

    established, it is a simp le step to prod uce average cast for

    System and Cal ifornia zone group bus miles. Continuing

    -37

  • 9 with Zone Group I as an examp1e, the bus mi1e expense for the

    group is developed in the following manner and takes the place

    of the 3.60 and 3.64 cents per bus mile shown in Table 11,

    Page 18.

    TABLE VIII

    Account 4220 - Drivers' Wages S:;tstem and California Averaqe Cost Per Bus Mile

    Zone GrouQ I - Year Ended SeQtember 30. 1960

    . ... .. . . vveightedfri vers' Wages': Bus Miles Operated: Dollar :Average Crivers'

    Zone :Per Bus Mi le: Year Ended No. : la/59 Check: Seot 30 1960

    : Amount : Wage Expense: (ifx( 3) : F 0'1' Zon~ Grouo

    (1 ) (2 ) (3) (4 ) (5 ) System 102 12.910

  • 6~~OUUI-4230_=-f~g1-F08 REVEN~E EQU1M\lg~I The treatment of fue1 expense for motor coaches i5

    similar to that out1ined for Account5 4141 and 4142 with the

    exception that a correction factor i5 ap~ lied to the distri

    buted California fue1 expense which accrues as in Column 8 of

    Table 119 Page 18. The correction is based on the fact that due to it5 oil production, California enjoys a favorable position in the fuel market. In order to reflect this ad

    vantage in the fuel expense allocated to California and

    California intrastate operations, the adjusted di5tributed expense for each zone group operating in California is

    corrected by a factor dependent upon the extent of its

    California operation. This factor reflects the follo wing

    procedure for zone groups operating in California:

    l. Mainline zone groups operating primarily in

    California service (2, 5, la, 12, 15 i 17, 18) based on average California price per gallon,

    2. ~ainline zone groups operating primarily in

    California inter5tate service (1, 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14) based on average of California price per gallon and price per gallon outside California,

    3. Local zone groups operating in San Francisco Bay

    Area (53, 54, 55, 56, 59, 60) - San Francisco price per gallon,

    4. Local Zone Group 57-Los Angeles price per gallon,

    5. Local Zone Group 58-San Diego price per gallon.

    Q O O

    - 39

  • ACCOUNT 4262 - BRIDGE, TUNNEL & FERRY TOLLS For mainline operations, system tolls expense is

    developed by zones frorn scheduled bus trips through toll

    crossings. Frorn this developmen~ tolls paid in California

    may be separated, at which point, it becomes necessary to

    determine the amount of tolls paid in California that should

    be allocated to the California total operation. It would

    be sound reasoning to conclude that sorne of the toll expense

    in California should be assigned to other states, if the

    theory "the expense is for the good of the whole trip" is

    adopted. It would also be reasonable to allocate sorne of

    the toll expense in other states to California operations.

    If a San Francisco-Chicago trip is considered, a portion of

    the toll paid in San Francisco would be allocated to all

    st ates between Cal i fornia and 111inois, inclusive. The

    size of this account does not justify the analysis necessary to allocate on this basis and therefore an alternative method

    is used that allocates toll expense only to passengers riding

    in California on zones involving toll expenses. All tolls

    paid in California are considered applicable to the California

    operations only and are therefore applicable to California

    passengers only. Since California interstate and intrastate

    passengers regardless of length of ride, pay the sarne ex t ra

    fare when their trip involves a toll crossing, this method

    amounts to a revenue offset which is reasonable and fair

    since the extra revenue paid is included in California total

    passenger revenue. For intrastate, a reasonable allocation can

    - 40

  • be made on the basis of intrastate passengers as a percent of

    California total passengers for toll zones involved. In

    doing this, the assumption is made that the percent of

    California passengers making a toll crossing on the zones

    involved is the same for both intrastate and interstate.

    \fuile the assumption is not entirely correct, it is believed

    that the error introduced is negligible and results in a slight

    overstatement of California intrastate expenses. (See diagram - page 42). The amount of this overstatement in view of the size of the account is deemed to make no

    appreciable distortion in the over-all results of the

    California intrastate operation.

    Special studies are made to determine tolls

    applicab1e to local operations.

    - 41

  • Examp1e of a bus trip subject to a toll which serves through three states from San Francisco to a desti

    nation outside Western Greyhound Line's territory and the

    13 tYres of passengers (arrows) who might use this service. Passengers 1, 4, 5, 7 are related to toll expense. However,

    passengers 1, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13 will be used to allocate

    to intrastate. This method wou1d give correct results if: 10 11 + 12 + 13

    =1 + 10 4 + 5 + 7 + 11 + 12 + 13

    WESTERN GREYHOUND LINES

    Fran

    CALIFORNIA I

    San I B U S I cisC9

    STATE # 2 TRI P

    STATE # 3 Z O N E

    h-Intra* I I I 4-Inter* I

    I I 5-Inter* I I I ! I

    2-Intra ..

    6-Inter

    7-Inter*

    3-Intra

    -

    -

    ..

    8-Inter

    10-Intra .. 9-Inter

    ll-Inter

    12-Inter

    ~TO~1POlnt l3-Inter

    * Tariff Fare Inc1udes To11 Charge.

    - 42

  • ACCOUNT 4300 - STATION EXPENSE

    SPECIAL NOTE

    A general discussion of the procedures deve10ped

    for the allocation of station expenses is contained in this

    section. Included are explanations of the methods used for

    the following accounts:

    l. Account 4311 - Station Salaries

    2. Account 4331 - Commissions Paid

    3. Account 4340 - Interline Commissions-Paid 4. Account 4350 - Interline Commissions-Earned

    5. Various - Station Overheads More comprehensive explanations of the methods

    used for the various accounts are contained in a separate

    vOlume, which is devoted exclusively to station expense

    alloca tion and in which is included the deta iled studies

    and statistical data used in developing station expense

    alloca tion procedures.

    -43

  • ACCOUNT 4311 - STATION SALARIES

    The basic premise used in developing the allocation

    procedures for station expense, including station salaries,

    is that all of the expenses applicable to the intrastate

    operations of a particular state are incurred entirely

    within that state. This conclusion follows consideration

    of the fact that an intrastate passenger by definition, is

    one whose trip is consummated without crossing a stateline

    and he therefore never has occasion to use any station

    facilities located outside of the .state in which he travels.

    Inasmuch as all of Greyhound's station facilities

    are available to both intrastate and interstate passengers,

    the problem presented in developing the intrastate station

    expense for any single sta te is a matter of determining what

    portion of all the station expenses in that state pertain

    to intrastate operations.

    For the State of California. ticket selling time

    studies were made at most of the company operated stations

    with particular attention given to the larger facilities at

    San Francisco, Los Angeles. Sacramento and San Diego. Through

    these studies, the relative length of time required to sell

    various types of tickets was determined. These findings were

    then applied to a special analysis of the 570,000 ticket sales

    which had been made for all California stations for the month

    of May 1959; May is considered a typical month as it represents

    a transition period between the seasonal variations evidenced

    by the heavy summer vacation travel and the comparatively

    light volume of business in the winter months.

    - 44 ._-------

  • The allocation of baggage clerks' wages presents

    a two-fold problem; first, a separation between baggage and

    express handling and, second, an allocation of both categories

    to intrastate and interstate service. Activities in the

    baggage departments of California stations W2re carefully

    observed by members of the Commission's staff and lengthy

    discussions were held with terminal managers and working

    personnel in arriving at a means of separating baggage clerks'

    wages between baggage and express handling. Special allocation

    studies were then made for both baggage and express handling.

    In connection with the problem of allocating

    baggage handling expense, thousands of departing passengers

    were interviewed at the major stations concerning the origins of their trips, their destinations, and how many bags they

    had checked. The results of this survey were combined with

    those obtained from several special checks made by the company.

    Analysis of these studies, taken either collectively or in

    dividually, devaloped the fact that the number of station bag

    handlings incurred by the average passenger are directly

    related to the distance of his trip. It was therefore

    concluded that the proper method for allocating baggage

    handling expense is on the basis of passenger miles.

    The allocation of express handling expense is

    based on percentages developed from an analysis of the

    relative number of intrastate and interstate bus bilIs

    handled at company aperated stations during a representative

    test periodo

    - 45

  • Station salaries, other than those for ticket

    clerks and baggage-express clerks, or employees whose

    functions are close1y re1ated thereto, are classified as over

    head expenses and are allocated in the rnanner out1ined for

    this type of account as discussed under Station Overheads.

    Figure 1, following, schernatica11y presents the

    procedures for a110cating Account 4311.

    - 46

  • TICKET CLERKS TELEPHONE ANO

    INFORMATION CLERKS

    SPECIJ STUDY I

    MAINlINE LOCAL

    SPECIAL STUOY 100% INTRA

    1 JINTERI

    GENERAL PROCEDURE FOR ALLOCATING CALlF

    BAGGAGE - EXPRESS CLERKS

    MAINlINE BAGGAGE

    I SfECIAL STUOY NON E TO LOCAL

    ACCOUN ~ STATlON 5

    (CALIFORNIA

    TRAVEL 8UREAU

    MAINlINE EXPRESS

    PSGR. MILES PIECE HANOllNGS

    1 IltHRA] t INTER1

    1 II-N T R A I 1IN T E-RJ [

    ACCOUNl CAlIfO INTRAS

    woC

  • ,ALlFORNIA STATION SALARIES (ACCOUNT 4311)

    ~ OUNT 4311 ON SALARIES ORNIA STATIQNS)

    TERMINAL ADMINISTRATlON

    CASHIERS STENOS : TICKET OFF ICE CLERKS

    :! SPECIAL STUDY

    SPECIAL STUDY NONE T9 LOCAL

    COUNT 43J I :AlI FORN lA NTRASTATE

    1

    MA1NlI~E LOCAL

    PASSE,NGERS 100% INTRA

    r INTRAI INTERI

    FIGURE I

    CUSTODIAL EMPLOYEES

    - 47 - CALIFORNIA PUBlIC UTILlTIES CO MM IS SI ON TRANSPORTATION DIVISION - MAR22,I 96 1

  • ACCOUNT 4331 - COMNITSSIONS PAID

    An appreciable volume of passenger ticket sales,

    express forwarded and received, and charter trip promotions

    are handled by non-salaried agents of Greyhourid who operate

    on a commission basis. The compensation paid these agents

    is generally ten percent of the revenue that they se cure for

    the company through their sales efforts.

    The percent of California intrastate passenger

    revenue that is subject to commission is determined by an analysis of the revenue and ticket sales for a typical month.

    For the test month, the portions of both mainline and local

    intrastate revenues that are subject to a commission ar e ascertained. The percentages thus obtained are then used in

    estimating passenger revenue commission expense.

    The portions of intrastate express and charter

    revenues subject to commission expense are determined in a similar manner except that the selection of test periods is

    not limites by the seasonal variations that occur for

    passenger ticket sales.

    -~-

  • ACCOUNT 4340 - INTERLINE cOr"MISSIONS PAID 6CCOUNT 4350 - INTER~):NE-Ca.i\i .ITSS I ON~i....EARED

    Western Greyhound Lines as a division of The

    Greyhound Corporation handles passengers to and from points

    located in other Greyhound divisions in addition to inter

    changing passengers with other carriers on through con

    structive fare arrangements. Interline tickets are both sold

    and honored by Western. A commission is charged other

    divisions and foreign carriers on the amounts of fares for

    travel over their lines on tickets sold in Western territory.

    Account 4300, Station Expense, is credited with these

    commis s ions earned. The number of intrastate interline

    tickets sold in California is so negligible that none of the

    commissions earned in California are allocated to intrastate

    service; any minor distortion therefrom is further lessened

    in light of the fact that the full amount of interline

    commissions paid and earned is charged to interstate service.

    The commission expense to Western for ticket s sold

    by other divisions or other carriers and honored on Western's

    lines i5 prorated to California on a trunk-line, raute-mile

    basis. Again, since an insigni f icant amaunt of this expense

    pe rtains to California intrastate service, all of t he

    California expense is charged to interstate service.

    e o n

    -49

  • STATION OVERHEADS

    Various expenses of operating stations are of an

    overhead nature, that is, they are not chargeable to a

    particular function for which the actual use can be readily

    measured. These expenses are incurred on behalf of all the

    passengers who use company operated stations. The number of

    passengers of each category who use an individual station is

    reasonably indicated by the number of tickets sold to each

    type of passenger. It has been observed that long distance

    riders avail themselves of station facilities to a greater

    extent than do the passengers who make comparatively short

    trips. Therefore, weightings reflecting this rela t ive usage

    have been applied to the various types of passengers. After

    determining the total number of units of use for each type of

    service at the individual stations, the amounts of overhead

    expense chargeable to local service, intrastate mainline and

    interstate service are calculated. The percentage relation

    ships between the amounts of intrastate mainline and interstate

    expense obtained in this manner were found to closely

    approximate the percentage distribution of the Califo~nia main

    line passengers carried during the period for which the analysis

    of station ticket sales was made.

    The allocation of station overhead expenses is made

    to local services using the test percentages applicable to the

    individual stations and the remainder is charged on a sta te

    basis to mainline intrastate and interstate operations on

    the basis of the number of passengers carried in each clas s of

    traffic.

    - 50

  • The f o11owing accounts are included in the s tation

    overhead group:

    Account No.

    4311

    4311 4311

    4315 4319 5011 5231 5232 5322 5.362

    5372 3601 (1) 3609

    (1) Category 2.

    Description

    Expenses

    Terminal Managers, Assistant Managers and Agents

    Janitors, Redcaps and Porters Cashiers, stenographers and Ticket Office Clerks

    Light, heat, power and water Repairs, Buildings and Equip~ent Station DepreciationReal Estate Taxes ( Station) Personal Property Taxes (Station)Station Rent (Dr.) Station Rent (Cr.)

    Income

    Station Renta1 Income Revenue from parcel lockers Other station revenue

    - 51

  • ACCOUNT 4410 - SALARIES AND EXPENSES. TRAFFIC S.Q11fillT10N

    Employees whose salaries are included in this

    account are sales managers, assistant sales managers, regional

    sales managers, district sales representatives, and clerks and

    stenographers.

    The major portion of the effort of these employees is devoted to activities concerning commission and tour agencies.

    District representatives act as auditors and keep track of

    ticket and express sales, sometimes select sites for agenci e s

    and sign contracts for agency operations. Other functions of

    their positions are the solicitation and promotion of charter

    and package express business~ They are also responsible for

    placing signs and advertising material in company stations.

    The net tangible results of the efforts of these

    employeesare difficult to determine as are the relative

    amounts of their time that should be assigned to their

    various f unctions. These salaries and expenses are therefore

    considered to be related to the over-all operation and are

    al l oc ated to the different services in particular areas on

    the basis of passenger miles which is judged to be the most equitable measure of the employees' activities.

    - 52

  • ACCOUNT ltlt40 - 'rICK8'rS_.AND BAGGApE gliS:cK, There are three main types of tickets in general

    use oy /vestern Gl'eyhound.

    (1) Roll tickets - preprinted destinations These are used for trips entirely

    within Western's System. They are mostly

    intrastate tickets although there are an

    appreciable number used for interstate trips.

    (S.F.-Reno and S.F.-Portland are examples.) (2) Open form tickets - origin, destination b1ank

    These are used for various destinations

    to which the vo1ume ofpassengers is insuf

    fi~ient to warrant carrying a supply of roll

    tickets. While these are used largely f or

    interstate and interline trips a considerable

    number are used in intrastate services.

    (3) 20-ride commutation tickets - tear off Used in local commute service.

    In general, baggage checks are all of the same type

    with a few of the most-used having pre-printed destinations.

    No problem i5 encountered in allocating baggage check expenses

    as the expense is not applicable to local operations and for

    mainline operations is allocable on the basis of passenger

    miles as developed for baggage clerks' wages under Account

    4311.

    -53 ..

    ------"- - ---

  • For the allocation of ticket printing expense, a

    special study of the cost of printing tickets applicable to

    the local operations was made for the year ended March 3l t 1960. After the removal of local operations ticket expense,

    the remainder, which is applicable to mainline operations,

    lends itse1f readily to an analysis based on number of

    tickets used (passengers) and comp1exities of ticket (passenger miles).

    An analysis, made by the Commissio~ staff and

    company personnel of the cost of printing various types of

    mainline tickets and of the number used, indicated that the

    relative cost could be reasonably based on the number used and

    the distance traveled weighted equally. Further analysis

    revealed that after removal of the cost of local operations

    tickets from Account 4440, the remaining e~ense applied 75

    percent to tickets and 25 percent to baggage checks. Using

    50-50 weight for passengers and passenger miles on the 75 per

    cent for tickets and 100 percent passenger mile weight en the

    25 percent fer baggage checks, produces a weight of 37~ percent for passengers and 62~ percent for passenger miles. In order

    ~o account for the duplicate state passenger count, the

    passenger weighting was reduced on a judgment basis to 35 percent and the passenger mile weighting raised to 65 percent.

    - 54

  • ACCOUNT 4470 - ADVEF.TISING

    The advertising expense of all Greyhound companies

    is billed to The Greyhound Corporation. The expenses of the

    individual companies are added to that incurred by the

    corporation on behalf of the whole system a~d the resulting

    total expense is reapportioned to the varlous companies on

    the basis of revenues earned.

    Western Greyhound does not have an advertising

    department. The company sales managers ge nerally handle any

    matters relating t o advertising which requi r e the attention

    of company representatives. The actual arrangements for

    radio 2nd television time, etc., are handled by advertising

    agencies.

    It is evident that the effort spe nt in securing

    increased passenger business is directed toward people who

    do not ordinarily travel by Greyhound, that is, to those who

    have never used the service or to those whose use of it has

    be en very infrequent. Anyone who has used Greyhound serv ice

    to any great extent is urllikely to be influenced by advertising

    o~e way or another with the possible exception of tour

    adverti sing or the suggestion of visiting specific places or

    attending speclal events. However, the contribution to

    passenger and revenue statistics made by passengers t hr ough

    r egular .r iding habi t 5 (commute tr lps, particu lar 1 y) i s not a reflection of the incurrence of advertising expense. Even

    though a regular or commute rider was originally influenced

    to try GreyhouGd service as the r esult of insti t utional

    adverti sing, whether he continues this use depends entirely

    uron his personal experience with the service (e.g., frequenc y - S5

  • comf or t, speed, cost, etc.). On ce a rider has weighed t hese factors and compared them with those experienced on other

    mean s of transportation, he draws conclusions about the

    desirability of bus service and advertising is not likely to

    change those conclusions unless, of course, marked and specifie

    improvements in service are announced through advertising media.

    The only aecurate determination of the effectiveness

    of advertising in connection with a specific type of serviee

    should be made by knowing how much less business would have

    been done by the service had there been no adver t isiqg , or

    conversely, how much more with advertising.

    This differential seems impossible to determine in

    connection wi th mainline service and occasional local ri ding.

    It is unl ikely , however, that the volume of peak hour commute

    riQers wo uld have been measurably less for any period of time had the comp any no t engaged in advertising (partic ula rly since almost no advertising is specifically directed to them).

    The product that Greyhound advertises for sale is

    bus seat miles and the measure of sales is passenger miles.

    The sales res ulting from advertising are the passenger mi les

    r epr esenting certain occasional riders who are usua lly

    of t he long haul type. It appears, therefore, that an

    equitable allocation of advertising exp en se, and th e one

    followed in this manual, should be made on a passenger mile

    basis with the judgment provision that all passenger miles r epre senting regular and commute riders be given half weight.

    o O O

    - 56

  • ACCOUNT 4531 - PUBLIC LIABILITY ANO PROPERTY OANlAGE - SELF INSURER

    Western Greyhound Lines provides its own insurance

    for public liability and property damage with the exception that

    certain policies are carried with insurance companies to cover

    excess liability which might arise from individual accidents

    of asevere nature.

    The allocation procedure for Account 4531 is handled

    in a manner similar to that for Account 421l~ Supervision of

    Transportation. Expense and bus mile records are available

    by divisions and the use of these provides relative bus mile

    costs for California mainline and local operations. Again as

    for Account 4211 the average cost per bus mile for California

    mainline operations is judged to be the weighted average cost per bus mile for Oivisions 3, 4 and 6. The allocation to

    California intrastate mainline is based on equivalent passenger

    miles. For California local operations the expense per bus

    mile for Oivision 5 is used for Zone Groups 54 9 55, 56 and

    57 except Zone 870 (San Francisco-San Jose Express); the expense per mile for Oivision 4 is used for the remaining California

    local operations.

    It is of interest to note that public liability and

    property damage expense for any current period is comprised

    of payments actually made for claims during the period as we l l

    as estimates made by company personnel of the probable liability

    - 57

  • that will be assumed by the company for claims yet unsettled;

    it usually requires as much as six years to settle all claims

    for a given period, at which time, the actual cost of public

    liability and property damage for the period is finally

    determined.

    - 58

  • - - ------------------------------

    Considerable research time was spent by the Commission

    staff in an attempt to establish a relationship between the

    various 4600 subaccounts and the numerous operating statistics

    and expenses. The only reasonable correlation found was between

    employees' welfare expense (about 50 percent of the 4600 group) and wages and salaries spread throughout the several expense

    groups in Accounts 4100 to 4500, inclusive. The other functions

    covered by the 4600 accounts are management, administration,

    and general accounting with the related expens es of maintaining

    a general office in San Francisco; these functions are affected

    by or affect the sundry activities of the entire operation oi

    the company. For the most part, these activities may be

    reasonably measured by the expenses comprising the 4100 to 4500

    groups of accounts. It is evident upon examination of the 4100

    to 4500 groups that wages and salaries account for the major portion of the recorded totals in those groups. Although a

    determination can be made concerning the employees' welfare

    expenses applicable to wages and salaries paid, studies made

    reveal that no significant difference results if welfare expenses

    are related to account total s rather than just to the wages and salaries contained in the accounts; the latter method affords

    the advantage of eliminating a considerable amount of detail

    with its attendant time-consuming analysis.

    - 59

  • The accounts in the 4600 series are therefore prorated

    to the various op er a tions on the basis of the distribution of

    the expenses for the 4100 to4500 accounts.

    - 60

  • INVESTMENT, RESERVE ANO DEPRECIATION EXPENSE-LAND AND STRUCTURES

    The investments in land and the investments,

    reserves and depreciation expense as s ociated with the oper

    ating properties of the company are maintained on the ledgers

    by location and type of facility. These facilities fa11 into

    three categories :

    1 - Stations

    2 - Garages

    3 - General Office

    Following the general procedure for a110cation of

    station expenses, the investment, etc. for stations operated

    in California are separated by locations and treated in the

    same manner as station overhead expenses.

    Garage facilities are considered to be overheads

    to Accounts 4140 and 4150 and general off ice property as an

    overhead to Account 4600.

    The various accounts containing land and structures

    investment, reserve and depreciation expense are:

    Account 1201 - Land and Land Rights

    Account 1211 - Structures-Investment

    Account 2511 - Structures-Depreciation Reserve

    Account 5011 - Depreciation of Structures

    Account 1271 - Improvements to Leaseh01d PropertyInvestment

    Account 2571 - Improvements to Leaseh01d PropertyDepreciation Reserve

    Account 5071 - Depreciation on Improvements to Leasehold Property

    Account 1291 - Unfinished Construction (where applicable to any of the aboye accounts)

    o O ~ -61

  • ACCOUNT 5310 - EQUIPMENT RENTS - DEBIT ACCOtJNT'5350 - EQUIPMENT-RENTS-:-EREoIT- . .. _-_..- -------

    These two accounts represent the rentals paid and the

    rentals received for the leasing of equipment between Western

    Greyhound and other Greyhound divisions and between Western

    Greyhound and certain non-affiliated carriers. The rentals are

    generally based on the cost per bus mile for the fixed expenses

    connected with ownership of equipment and include a return on

    the investment in the equipment. Because of Western's

    geographical position in the Greyhound system, buses owned

    by Western log more miles outside Western territory than buses

    owned by companies other than Western l~g in Western territory. Te illustrate, Western will start one of its buses from San

    Francisco bound for Chicago and operate it to Rock Springs,

    Wyoming, the limit of Western territory. At that point Central

    Southwestern Greyhound would assume operation of the bus to

    Chicago, thereby providing through service without changing

    equipment. (See map - Page 5). In the same manner, Central initiates westbound Chicago-San Francisco trips with Cen ~ral

    owned equipment. Western would operate that equipment from Rack

    Springs to San Francisco. Subtracting the Central equi pment bus

    miles in Western territory (Rock Springs to San Francisco) from the Western equipment bus miles in Central territory (Rock Springs to Chicago) produces what are known as excess miles, these being in favor of Western. The total of situations such

    as the above example, but not necessarily confined to the San

    Francisco-Chicago operation, pr~duce excess miles which are in

    - 62

  • favor of Western Greyhound for any given periodo (For the year ended September 30, 1960, Western's excess miles to t a1ed

    2,767,170). This situation resu1ts in the fact that Western owns an excess of equipment over that nceded to opera te only

    those bus miles providing service in Western territory.

    For purposes of allocation, no adjustment is made for this excess of eq