Greg Gearheart

40
regulating our way to better creeks and streams greg gearheart stormwater program / swrcb

Transcript of Greg Gearheart

Page 1: Greg Gearheart

regulating our way to better creeks and streams

greg gearheart

stormwater program / swrcb

Page 2: Greg Gearheart

Image from John Hannon, USDOI/BOR

Page 3: Greg Gearheart

our mission

... is to preserve and enhance the

quality of ca’s water resources, and

ensure their proper allocation and

efficient use for the benefit of present

and future generations.

Page 4: Greg Gearheart
Page 5: Greg Gearheart
Page 6: Greg Gearheart
Page 7: Greg Gearheart

growth

...happens

Page 8: Greg Gearheart

Lodi

Page 9: Greg Gearheart

growth

... is heading for the parts of our state

where headwater, ephemeral, and other “functionally

significant” waters lie waiting...

Page 10: Greg Gearheart

but growth is not to blame.

Page 11: Greg Gearheart

I blame it on the rain.

Page 12: Greg Gearheart
Page 13: Greg Gearheart
Page 14: Greg Gearheart
Page 15: Greg Gearheart

Hydrologic Cycle

From Lake (2004)

Page 16: Greg Gearheart

we focus on hydromodification

(ounce of prevention)

Page 17: Greg Gearheart

hydromodification

• alteration of the hydrologic characteristics of waters, which in turn could cause degradation of water resources.

Page 18: Greg Gearheart

After Lane (1955) as cited in Rosgen (1996)

Page 19: Greg Gearheart

Increase in Bankfull Discharge

Ru

noff

Time

Pre-Development

Urbanization tends to increase storm water runoff:

peak flows

volume

frequency

Post-Develop.

From Haltiner (2006)

Page 20: Greg Gearheart

hydromod

... can cause problems

Page 21: Greg Gearheart
Page 22: Greg Gearheart
Page 23: Greg Gearheart

hardscaping our streams

... still happens?

Page 24: Greg Gearheart

Could this happentoday?

(Chicken Ranch Slough, Sacramento County – Channelized in 1950's)

Page 25: Greg Gearheart

1950's – Sacramento Area2000's – Sacramento Area

Page 26: Greg Gearheart
Page 27: Greg Gearheart

replumbing watersheds and floodplains

Page 28: Greg Gearheart
Page 29: Greg Gearheart

but we

... might have forgotten about the sediment side of the scales...

Page 30: Greg Gearheart
Page 31: Greg Gearheart

and what about

... the watershed context of the project?

Page 32: Greg Gearheart
Page 33: Greg Gearheart

and what about the floodplain?

Page 34: Greg Gearheart
Page 35: Greg Gearheart

water boards nuts and bolts

• our regulatory actions (e.g., npdes permits, cwa 401 certs, wdrs, enforcement, etc.) rely on our water quality (wq) standards:– water quality standard is either

• beneficial use(s) + objectives; or

• water boards may “choose to prevent any degradation” to high quality waters = antidegradation

Page 36: Greg Gearheart

beneficial uses used to protect california wetlands & streams

• AGR – agricultural supply

• FLD – flood peak attenuation/flood water storage

• FRSH – freshwater replenishment

• GWR – groundwater recharge

• MAR – marine habitat

• MUN – municipal and domestic supply

• RARE – preservation of rare and endangered species

• REC-1 – water contact recreation

• REC-2 – non-water contact recreation

• SHELL – shellfish harvesting

• SPAWN – fish spawning

• WARM – warm freshwater habitat

• WILD – wildlife habitat

• WQE – water quality enhancement

Page 37: Greg Gearheart

beneficial uses and streams

• bus are:

– designated in the basin plans to a specific waterbody at a specific location

– are not easily translated to some key wetland/stream functions and values

– frequently it takes a suite of BUs to cover “wetland functions and values” (often includes gaps and overlaps)

Page 38: Greg Gearheart

functional framework:regulatory tools

• landscape / watershed tool(s):

– storm water permits– ceqa ?

• waterbody tool(s):

– cwa 401 certifications– waste discharge requirements– waivers

• hybrid tools

– ms4 permits – gets at “local governments” and their processes

Page 39: Greg Gearheart
Page 40: Greg Gearheart

Image from John Hannon, USDOI/BOR

greg gearheart916-341-5892

[email protected]