Green Construction Code

in GCC :

Challenges & Opportunities

Dr. Yousef Alhorr

Founding Chairman

May 2015 - Riyadh

GORD Biography

• Established in 2009, a not-for-profit subsidiary of QATARI DIAR R.E.I. CO.

• Located at Qatar Science and Technology Park (QSTP)-Free Zone

• Focusing on promoting sustainability in the built environment

• Member of United Nation UNEP-SBCI Program

• Member of International Energy Agency (IEA) Solar Heating & Cooling

(SHC) Program

GORD Activities Portfolio

GORD

TRUST

GORD

INSTITUTE

GORD

ACADEMY

1. Performance Standards Development

2. Research & Development

3. Knowledge Dissemination

Performance Standards Development

Green

Code

GCC-BC

Construction

Scheme

Materials

Eco-Labeling

GULF EPD

Operations

Scheme

For Existing

Buildings

Climate Change/

Air Pollution

GCC has the highest

CO2 emissions per

capita in the world

Fossil Fuels

Depletion

GCC has the

highest energy

consumption per

capita in the

world

Water Depletion

GCC is among the

poorest countries in

the world in fresh

water

availability from

natural

resources

Water Pollution

GCC relies 100%

on desalination

which has negative

impacts on

environment

Materials Depletion/

Land Contamination

GCC is among top 10

countries worldwide in

the production of C&D

waste per capita

Environmental Challenges in GCC

GSAS Development Process

.: System Development Methodology Background

Development of an Energy Standard and Sustainability Assessment System (QSAS) for Barwa/Diar and the State of Qatar

Project Overview_process chart

Screening Stage 1_framework assessment criteria

[Scope]To what extent does the system provide total building evaluation as opposed to evaluating an individual design feature?

[Applicability]Can the rating system be used on all building types?

[Adaptability]How capable is the rating system in adapting to local situation?

[Transparency]Does the rating system publicly reveal its assessment method?Does the rating system provide documentation regarding the underlining intentions of the sustainability performance?

[Relevance]Does the assessment tool address effectively the local ecosystem and intentions of the regulator?

Screening Stage 1 involved generating a defined set of screening criteria to evaluate the 40 systems.The capacity of each framework was judged on the following criteria:

Screening Stage 1_overview

Screening Stage 1_ 40+ frameworks

Level 3 Rating Systems

Sustainable Building Rating Systems Source Developmental BasisAvailable to Public

Sustainable Building Rating Systems Source Developmental BasisAvailable to Public

Green mark

Building and Construction Authority (BCA) of Singapore

LEED, Green Star, and others (not disclosed)

2005 Green Star New Zealand New Zealand Green Star 2007

BREEAM (Building Research Establishment's Environmental Assessment Method)

UK Original 1990 HK BEAM (Hong Kong Building Environmental Assessment Method) Hong Kong BREEAM 1996/1998

BREEAM Canada Canada BREEAM 1996 HEQ (High Environmental Quality)International Approach

Undisclosed 1996

BREEAM Green Leaf Canada BREEAM, Green Leaf 2000 iDP (Integrated Design Process) Canada Original 1993

Calabasas LEED Calabasas, CA LEED 2003 Labs21- Laboratories for the 21st Century US Original TBD

CASBEE (Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency)

Japan Original 2002 LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) US GBC Original 2000

CEPAS (Comprehensive Environmental Performance Assessment Scheme) Hong KongHK BEAM and existing standards in HK

2007 LEED Canada Canada LEED TBD

Earth Advantage OregonUndisclosed for Earth Advantage; LEED for LEED for homes

pilot test 2005 LEED India India LEED TBD

EkoProfile/Eco-Profile (Okoprofil) NBI Norway Ecoprofile + ercb 1999 LEED Mexico Mexico LEED TBD

ESCALE France Undisclosed Undisclosed MSBG (The State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines) Minnesota, USLEED, Green Building Challenge '98, and BREEAM

Undisclosed

EEWH (Ecology, Energy, Waste and Healthy) Taiwan LEED, CASBEE 1999 NABERS (National Australian Built Environment Rating System) Australia Undisclosed Undisclosed

GBAS China GOBAS 2006 PromisE Finland Undisclosed Undisclosed

GBToolInternational Standard

Original 1998 Protocol ITACA GBTool Undisclosed

GB/T 50378-2006 China Undisclosed 2006 SBAT (Sustainable Buildings Assessment Tool) South Africa Original TBD

GEM ( Global Environmental Method) UK For Existing Buildings UK Green Globes Canada 2002 SBTool (formally known as GBTool)International Standard

GBTool 1998

GOBAS (Green Olympic Building Assessment System) China GBTool, CASBEE, BREEAM Undisclosed Scottsdale's Green Building Program Arizona, US Undisclosed Undisclosed

Green Building Rating System Korea BREEAM, LEED, BEPAC Undisclosed SPiRiT (Sustainable Project Rating Tool) or SPRTUS Army Corps of Engineer

LEED Undisclosed

Green Globes CanadaECD Energy and Environment Canada

BREEAM Green Leaf 2002TGBR (Teri's green building rating system)TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute); TERI–GRIHA (Green Rating for Integrated Habitat Assessment)

TERI India Undisclosed Undisclosed

Green Globes US US Green Globes Canada 2005 TQ (Total Quality) Austria GBTool 2000

Green Leaf Eco-Rating System Canada BREEAM, Green Leaf 1999 TQ-B (Total Quality Building) Austria TQ 2007

Green Star Australia Australian GBC BREEAM, LEED 2003

Screening Stage 1_chosen frameworks

Level 3 Rating Systems

Sustainable Building Rating Systems Source Developmental BasisAvailable to Public

Sustainable Building Rating Systems Source Developmental BasisAvailable to Public

Green mark

Building and Construction Authority (BCA) of Singapore

LEED, Green Star, and others (not disclosed)

2005 Green Star New Zealand New Zealand Green Star 2007

BREEAM (Building Research Establishment's Environmental Assessment Method)

UK Original 1990HK BEAM (Hong Kong Building Environmental Assessment Method)

Hong Kong BREEAM 1996/1998

BREEAM Canada Canada BREEAM 1996 HEQ (High Environmental Quality)International Approach

Undisclosed 1996

BREEAM Green Leaf Canada BREEAM, Green Leaf 2000 iDP (Integrated Design Process) Canada Original 1993

Calabasas LEED Calabasas, CA LEED 2003 Labs21- Laboratories for the 21st Century US Original TBD

CASBEE (Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency)

Japan Original 2002 LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) US GBC Original 2000

CEPAS (Comprehensive Environmental Performance Assessment Scheme)

Hong KongHK BEAM and existing standards in HK

2007 LEED Canada Canada LEED TBD

Earth Advantage OregonUndisclosed for Earth Advantage; LEED for LEED for homes

pilot test 2005

LEED India India LEED TBD

EkoProfile/Eco-Profile (Okoprofil) NBI Norway Ecoprofile + ercb 1999 LEED Mexico Mexico LEED TBD

ESCALE France Undisclosed UndisclosedMSBG (The State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines)

Minnesota, USLEED, Green Building Challenge '98, and BREEAM

Undisclosed

EEWH (Ecology, Energy, Waste and Healthy) Taiwan LEED, CASBEE 1999NABERS (National Australian Built Environment Rating System)

Australia Undisclosed Undisclosed

GBAS China GOBAS 2006 PromisE Finland Undisclosed Undisclosed

GBToolInternational Standard

Original 1998 Protocol ITACA GBTool Undisclosed

GB/T 50378-2006 China Undisclosed 2006 SBAT (Sustainable Buildings Assessment Tool) South Africa Original TBD

GEM ( Global Environmental Method) UK For Existing Buildings

UK Green Globes Canada 2002 SBTool (formally known as GBTool)International Standard

GBTool 1998

GOBAS (Green Olympic Building Assessment System) China GBTool, CASBEE, BREEAM Undisclosed Scottsdale's Green Building Program Arizona, US Undisclosed Undisclosed

Green Building Rating System Korea BREEAM, LEED, BEPAC Undisclosed SPiRiT (Sustainable Project Rating Tool) or SPRTUS Army Corps of Engineer

LEED Undisclosed

Green Globes CanadaECD Energy and Environment Canada

BREEAM Green Leaf 2002TGBR (Teri's green building rating system)TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute); TERI–GRIHA (Green Rating for Integrated Habitat Assessment)

TERI India Undisclosed Undisclosed

Green Globes US US Green Globes Canada 2005 TQ (Total Quality) Austria GBTool 2000

Screening Results_ six chosen frameworks

[1] BREEAM - UKBuilding Research Establishment's Environmental Assessment MethodUnited Kingdom • Original Tool • Released 1990

[2] CASBEE - JapanComprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental EfficiencyJapan • Original Tool • Released 2002

[3] CEPAS – Hong Kong Comprehensive EnvironmentalPerformance Assessment SchemeHong Kong • HK Beam as developmental basis • Released 2007

[4] Green Globes - CanadaCanada • BREEAM as developmental basis • Released 2002

[5] LEED - USALeadership in Energy and Environmental DesignUnited States • Original Tool • Released 2002

[6] SBTool – InternationalSustainable Building ToolCanada • BREEAM as developmental basis • Released 2002

Analysis Stage 2_review criteria

[Development]The ideal rating system makes use of Life-Cycle Analysis, consensus-based standards and expert opinion.

[Usability]Any procedure applied must be relatively easy and simple to use.

[System Maturity]A proven track record is an indication that the tool is effective.

[Technical Content]The system needs to address the environmental areas of concern through its site optimization, energy and water use, environmental quality, and materials selection.

[Measurability + Verification]A defined, standardized method for collection and analysis is required for the efficacy of the tool.

[Communicability]The results should be easily understood.

Analysis Stage 2_assessment

Review Criteria_measurability + verification

Measurability and Verification

Standardization Quantification Certification/Verification Process Documentation Verifiable/Defendable

Established Collection

Procedures (0 - 4)

Numeric Measurements

(0 - 4)

System for Verification

(0 - 4) Level of Detail Assessor Qualification Type Stage of Project Evaluation Results

Explanation Provided for Cost vs Benefits

(0 - 4)

BREEAM 2 2 4documents and drawings are reviewed

trained + licensed by BRE

supporting documentation or proof during walk through

design + post construction

Unclassified (<30%)Pass (30-44%)Good (45-54%)Very Good (55-69%)Excellent (70-84%)Outstanding (85-100%)

4

Green Globes

CAN2 0 2

documents and drawings are reviewed

architect or engineersupporting documentation and walk through

schematic design + construction document

Globes: 1 (15-34%)2 (35-54%)3 (55-69%)4 (70-84%)5 (85-100%)

0

CASBEE 3 4 3

assessor reviews result sheet and corresponding materials

"first-class" architect, training, examination, certification

not specifiedpre-design, new construction, existing building, renovation

S: excellent,A, B+,B-,C: poor

1

SBTool 4 4 4

group reviews and discusses each building chosen with all corresponding materials

representative members of participating countries

specified supporting documents (drawings, etc.)

pre-design, design, as built, operations, and up to three occupancy types in a single project

-1 (deficient), 0 (minimum),

+3 (good), +5 (best)

2

CEPAS 3 3 4documents and drawings are reviewed

employee of buildings department

drawings and reports designBronze , Silver, Gold, and Platinum

0

LEED 4 2 4administrative and credit audit

must pass an assessor examination

supporting documentation, drawings (online and/or paper-based)

design phase and construction phase reviews

Certified , Silver, Gold, and Platinum

1

From Phase I to Phases II & III with Feedback from International experts

System Framework

.: Scoring & Weighting

Development of an Energy Standard and Sustainability Assessment System (QSAS) for Barwa/Diar and the State of Qatar

Weighting- Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

DEFINITIONAHP is a systematic decision-making method whereby stakeholders determine the relative importance or weights of a series of factors by comparing one factor to another. The comparisons are carried out on a 9-point intensity scale for all unique pairs of factors.

3 STEPS1. Define factors based on the main objective of the project [Chan Center]2. Determine the relative importance of each factor by pair-wise comparison

[Stakeholders]3. Verify logical consistency between factors [Chan Center]

HISTORYBased on mathematics and human psychology, it was developed by Thomas L. Saatyin the 1970s and since then has been extensively studied and refined. The AHP method provides a comprehensive and rational framework for structuring a problem, representing and quantifying its elements, relating those elements to overall goals, and evaluating alternative solutions. It is used throughout the world in a wide variety of decision situations, in fields such as government, business, industry, healthcare, and education.

Weighting + Scoring

Criteria Weighting

XX

0 - No impact.5 - Secondary impact1 - Primary impact

Climate Change [10%]

Impact Level

Environmental Impact for Each Criterion

x

Fossil Fuel Depletion [6%]

Water Depletion [19%]

Materials Depletion [6%]

Land Use & Contamination [6%]

Water Pollution [14%]

Air Pollution [16%]

Human Comfort & Health [22%]

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

a₁

a₂

a₃

a₄

a₅

a₆

a₇

a₈

a₁ + a₂ + a₃ + a₄ + a₅ + a₆ + a₇ + a₈ = Total Impact for Each Criterion (X_i)

Total Impact

Intensity_ calculation

=

Extent DurationIntensity

Normalize ResultsImpact Weighting

Multiplication of Factors

Criterion Weighting_ Percentage Score

Result

1: 0-102: 11-203: 21-304: 31-405: 41-506: 51-607: >60

X_i

1: <10m/space2: 10-100m or building3: Site4: Neighborhood5: Urban/City6: Regional7: Global

Y_i

1: Transient/023: Several Years45: Decades67: Indefinitely

Z_i

X_i * Y_i * Z_iX_i * Y_i * Z_i

∑ X_n * Y_n * Z_n

n=1

i

Process _

∑ Criterion_n

Normalize_Results

Category_weighting

Cat

ego

ry B

Cat

ego

ry Z

Cat

ego

ry A Criterion

_1

Criterion_2

Criterion_3

Criterion_4

Criterion_5

Criterion_6

Criterion_i-

2

Criterion_i-

1

Criterion_i

Criteria weighting_Percentage Score

……

.

……

.

n=i-2

i

……

.∑

Criterion_nn=3

6

∑ Criterion_nn=1

2÷

÷

÷

÷

÷

÷

÷

÷

÷

Sum of Criteria weight_in same Category

Weight redistribution_ within the Category

Criterion

_1

Criterion_2

Criterion_3

Criterion_4

Criterion_5

Criterion_6

Criterion_i-

2

Criterion_i-

1

Criterion_i

……

.

=

=

=

Criteria weighting

Weight_Z

… ….

Weight_B

Weight_Ax

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

=

=

=

Final weight

Criterion _1

Criterion_2

Criterion_3

Criterion_4

Criterion_5

Criterion_6

Criterion_i-2

Criterion_i-1

Criterion_i

……

.

.: Energy Standard

Development of an Energy Standard and Sustainability Assessment System (QSAS) for Barwa/Diar and the State of Qatar

Overall objective

Support new building codes in that mandate reductions in fossil energy

consumption based on an energy performance standard

Steps in the development

1.Select appropriate baseline for standard

• Choose between CEN-ISO (Europe), ASHRAE (USA) or hybrid

2.Validate the use in local context

• Choose validation test set of buildings

• Identify the need for local provisions (special buildings, district cooling, etc.)

3.Add local provisions

4.Develop accompanying documentation

• Special provisions and design guidelines

5.Prepare the development of building codes referencing the new standard

Energy Standard Development_overview

Building Energy Performance Rating at 3 Levels

Level 1 : Qnd ,

EPCnd

-Performance evaluation of

thermal energy demand, based

on calculation of heating &

cooling demand

-Includes heat transmission,

ventilation, solar heat gain,

internal heat gain

Level 2 : Edel ,

EPCdel

-Performance evaluation of

building energy consumption

based on calculation of heating,

cooling, lighting, DHW,

receptacles, auxiliary energy

consumption

-Consideration of all on site

systems, including local energy

generation and renewable energy

systems

ERen_ge

n

ELightEDHWERecEAux

ECool

EHeat

Level 3a : EP ,

EPCP-Performance evaluation of primary

energy use at the source, based on

calculation of generation,

distribution, district systems, delivery

on site

Primary EnergyDelivered Energy

Building Energy Need

Level 3b :

CO2, EPCCO2Performance evaluation of

CO2 emissions to meet

building demand, from

primary source through to

delivery

CO2 emissions

Assessment of overall energy use

And conversion factors

Expressing energy performance

Energy needs for

heating and cooling Lighting DHW

Heating and

Cooling system

characteristics

Ventilation

systems

Automation

and controls

Internal heat gainsHeat

transmissionAir change

Indoor and

outdoor climate

Solar heat and

daylighting

Building

Building energy

consumption

Normative

calculation

Building energy

needs

Primary energy

Input data

CEN-ISO Energy Standard_introduction

CEN

• European Committee for Standardization

European Standards (ENs)

• Support the EPBD (Energy Performance Building Directive) to

regulate building energy consumption by providing the energy

performance calculation methods and associated materials

General Standards

Heating System Standards

Ventilation & Cooling System Standards

Calculation Standards

Supporting Standards

Building Physics Standards

Inspection Standards

ISO: International Standardization Organization

• Has adopted the CEN approach

[E] Energy – CEN Standard

Strategic Approach to Reduce Energy and Carbon Emissions

Publications

GSAS System Framework

GSAS Schemes

(I) Classical Schemes

• Districts (NH)

• Commercial

• Residential

• Education

• Core & Shell

• Hospitality

• Healthcare

• Light Industries

(II) Unique Schemes

• Sports Facilities

• Mosques

• Parks

• Railways

• Infrastructure

• Workers

Accommodation

GSAS Design Manuals Suite

GSAS manuals and documents developed to date

include the following:

• Construction: GSAS Assessment and Guidelines

• Districts: GSAS Design Guidelines

• Districts: GSAS Design Assessment

• GSAS Energy Application

• GSAS Training Manual: Commercial

& Residential – Part I

• GSAS Training Manual: Commercial

& Residential – Part II

• GSAS Technical Guide

• Health Care: GSAS Design Guidelines

• Health Care: GSAS Design Assessment

• Parks: GSAS Design Guidelines

• Parks: GSAS Design Assessment

• Railways: GSAS Design Guidelines

• Railways: GSAS Design Assessment

• RFP Preparation: GSAS All Typologies

• Sports: GSAS Design Guidelines

• Sports: GSAS Design Assessment

• Typologies: GSAS Design Guidelines

• Typologies: GSAS Design Assessment

• Operations: GSAS Guidelines

• Operations: GSAS Assessment

• Workers Accommodation: GSAS Design Guidelines

• Workers Accommodation: GSAS Design Assessment

Construction & Operations Schemes

Construction Management Scheme

(Construction Practices)

Provides information on the assessment of the aspects of the

construction process that has a lasting environmental impact and

considers what impacts the project can mitigate. It requires a thorough

review of the contractors practices during the execution stage of the

project to ensure its adherence to sustainability during that stage.

Operations

(Existing – Renovations – (EPL – WPL)

Provides information for the evaluation of the environmental impact of

building operations, verifies the original design intent, evaluate

changes made through renovations and changes, and considers what

impacts the project can mitigate.

The scheme is comprehensive and can be used to assess existing

buildings and renovated ones. It also encompasses assessment of

energy performance (EPL) and water performance (WPL).

Operation Scheme for Existing Buildings

42

• Energy

Consumption

Labeling

• Water

Consumption

Labeling

• Indoor

Environmental

Quality Labeling

GULF EPDv1.0 -2015

• First Environmental

Products Declaration

Scheme for Construction

Products in GCC

• Systematic assessment

method based on

International Standards

ISO & EN

• Whole life cycle

• Quantitative

• Multiple indicators /

metrics

• Helps to understand and

manage trade-offs

•

EN 15804:2012, Sustainability of construction works – Environmental product declarations –

Core rules for the product category of construction products.

EN 15643-1:2010, Sustainability of construction works – Sustainability assessment of

buildings – Part 1: General framework

EN 15643-2:2011, Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of buildings – Part 2:

Framework for the assessment of environmental performance

EN 15978:2011, Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of environmental

performance of buildings – Calculation method

CEN/TR 15941:2010, Sustainability of construction works – Environmental product

declarations – Methodology for selection and use of generic data

EN 15942:2011, Sustainability of construction works – Environmental product declarations –

Communication formats: business to business.

ISO 14025:2010, Environmental labels and declarations – Type III Environmental

declarations – Principles and procedures

ISO 21930:2007, Sustainability of construction works – Environmental declaration of building

products (as referenced by EN 15804)

ISO 14040:2006, Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and

framework

ISO 14044:2006, Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and

guidelines

LCA – ISO/EN Standards

Extraction, Production, Manufactur

e

Construction

Use End-of-life

Reuse

Recycling

Recovery

The product life cycle

Green Construction Code v1.0 -2015

• First-Performance Based

Green Buildings Code

Employing

Benchmarking Approach

• Two Levels of Indicators:

- Level (I): Prescriptive

- Level (II): Performance

• Flexibility of

Implementation/Adjustm

ent According to Culture

and Legislation Status

GSAS implementation Levels

Implementation

Levels

Micro Level

Building

Typologies

Legacy

Level

Macro Level

City / District

Infrastructure

Level

Macro Level: City/Districts GSAS Implementation

City Level• Lusail City• Economic zone (I)• Economic Zone (II)• Economic Zone (III)• MOI City• BARWA City• Mowater City

Districts/Neighborhoods Level• Navigation Logistics Project• QP District• Doha Festival Project• Other Projects

Total Registered Cities Area = 1,750,000 sq. ft.

GSAS Implementation/ Legacy Projects

FIFA

Q2022

QATAR

2015

INDOOR

ARENAS

QATAR

RAIL

NAVY

BASE

NEW

PORTPROJECTS

Meuseum/

Zoo

GSAS Implementation/ Buildings Typologies

TOTAL

BUILT UP

AREA

MORE THAN

100,000,000 Sq. F.

GSAS Recognition

LOCAL

LEVEL

REGIONAL

LEVEL

INTERNATIONAL

LEVEL

QNMP 2032

(MMUP)

+

QCS 2010

CONSTRUCTION

STANDARDS

Saudi Arabia

+

Kuwait

+

GCC UNIFIED

BUILDING

CODE

FIFA 2022

+

IOC 2020

+

Handball W.C.

2015

State of Kuwait Adaptation

• Government Projects – Office Tower (35,000 sq.m.)

• Private Sector – Toyota Motor City (60,000 sq.m.)

GORD - Saudi Arabia Collaboration

NGO-Saudi Green Building

Council Partnership• Certifications

• Training

Saudi Council of Engineers• First green building forum 2010

• GSAS seminar Dec 2014

• Training & Outreach Activities

GORD - Saudi Arabia Collaboration

ACADEMIC - Alfaisal University• 16 Saudi Students-3-Day W.S.

• Joint R&D Activities

ACADEMIC - King Fahd University of

Petroleum and Minerals:• MoU

• Adopting GSAS in the curriculum of the

Environment Design Faculty

GORD - Saudi Arabia Collaboration

Riyadh – ADA• 3-Days Intensive Workshop

• 1-Day Awareness Workshop

• 1-Day Railways Workshop

Amanah Jeddah• 1-Day Awareness workshop

• Collaboration for Implementation

GORD - Saudi Arabia Collaboration

Saudi Energy Efficiency CentreOne Day Workshop

Half Day Senior Level workshop

Amanah Medina• 1-Day Awareness workshop

• Collaboration for implementation

Haram Al Nabawi Expansion

• 1-Day Awareness workshop• 3-Day Intensive Workshop• 1-Day Mosques Workshop

GORD - Saudi Arabia Collaboration

GCC Standardization

Organization

• MoU• Gulf EPD Workshop

Other Territories - MENA

FIFA

Q2022

QATAR

2015

INDOOR

ARENAS

QATAR

RAIL

NAVY

BASE

NEW

PORT

MOROCCO

SAUDI

SUDAN

JORDAN

KUWAIT

BAHRAIN

QATAR

Barrier to Sustainability Adaptation

• Lack of products/systems sourcing

• Lack of knowledge how to build a green

• Inadequate client knowledge

• Social acceptance & behaviour

• Lack of builder’s incentives

• Perceived & actual cost increases

• Certification cost/paperwork

• Lack of regulations and building codes

Barriers

FinancialBarriers

Societal Barriers

TechnicalBarriers

LegislativeBarriers

GORD’s Holistic Approach for Deployment

Seminars, Conferences, Publications, TV Shows,

InterviewsBsc, MSc, Phd, Educational

Programs, Scientific Journal

EcoVilla, Techno Hub

Railways,

Stadiums,

Towers,

CitiesLusail City extra

built-up area

GSASgate, Calculators, Toolkits,

Manuals

QCS 2014, EIA, GCC Unified Building

Code

61

www.gord.qa

Thank You