1 Lecture One MSN 541 ENTREPRENEURSHIP tek-GİS. 2 TEK-GIS PROGRAM imer/tek-gis.html tek-GİS.
Great Basin LCC€¦ · 15-07-2014 · Knowledge (S-TEK) working group Framing Workshop July 15,...
Transcript of Great Basin LCC€¦ · 15-07-2014 · Knowledge (S-TEK) working group Framing Workshop July 15,...
WELCOME!
For technical questions, contact Bridger Wineman
([email protected] or call mobile: 503.267.9688)
Science and
Traditional Ecological
Knowledge
(S-TEK) working group
Framing Workshop
July 15, 2014
S-TEK Strategy process overview
“Short list”
Science priorities
Evaluation criteria and
balancing factors
Guiding Principles
Inventory and “Long list” of LCC-wide needs
Science needs Management needs
S-TEK Strategic Plan
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Future Implementation
Traditional Ecological Knowledge
…the evolving knowledge acquired by indigenous and local peoples over hundreds or thousands of years through direct contact with the environment
Todd Hopkins
Approach to Integrating TEK
Dialogue on shared conservation goals
Exchange of traditional and western science to directly benefit tribal issues and circumstances
Models for engagement of tribal membership and traditional practitioners of TEK
Protocols to ensure protection of TEK
Strategies to protect treaty rights and trust resources
Todd Hopkins
FY 2014 RFP Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) Projects
Todd Hopkins
Sensitivity of Tribal Knowledge
Respect the need for sensitivity and heightened awareness
Work with tribes to identify issues and find a path forward that meets tribal needs as well as providing reasonable access to non-sensitive data and products
Proposals must include methods to protect sensitive TEK
Todd Hopkins
TEK Projects funded by other LCCs
Todd Hopkins
Gathering Our Thoughts: Tribal recommendations on a traditional knowledge management framework for the NPLCC - Tulalip Tribe
Preserving Tribal Self-Determination and Knowledge Sovereignty While Expanding Use of Tribal Knowledge and Management in Off Reservation Lands in the Face of Climate Change - Karuk Tribe
See more at www.northpacificlcc.org/Resources/Projects
Draft Guidelines Considering TEK in Climate Change Initiatives
Prepared for DOI Climate Change Advisory Committee (ACCCNRS)
Examine the significance of TEK in relation to climate change and the potential risk to indigenous peoples for sharing TEK
Promote the use of TEK: to benefit indigenous peoples, promote greater collaboration between federal agencies and
tribes increase tribal representations in federal climate initiatives
Todd Hopkins
Working Group Participants Karletta Chief, University of Arizona
Ann Marie Chischilly, Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals
Patricia Cochran, Alaska Native Science Commission
Mike Durglo, Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes
Preston Hardison, Tulalip Tribes
Joe Hostler, Yurok Tribe
Kathy Lynn, University of Oregon
Gary Morishima, Quinault Management Center
Don Motanic, Intertribal Timber Council
Jim St. Arnold, Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission
Garrit Voggesser, National Wildlife Federation
Kyle Powys Whyte, Michigan State University
Daniel Wildcat, Haskell Indian Nations University
Sue Wotkyns, Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals
Todd Hopkins
Draft guidelines for considering traditional knowledges (DOI ACCCNRS)
1. Understand key concepts and definitions related to TKs.
2. Recognize that indigenous peoples and holders of TKs have a right NOT to participate in interactions around TKs.
3. Understand and communicate risks for indigenous peoples and holders of TKs.
4. Establish an institutional interface between indigenous peoples, TK holders, and government for clear, transparent and culturally appropriate terms-of-reference, particularly through the development of formal research agreements.
Draft guidelines for considering traditional knowledges, cont.
5. Provide training for federal agency staff working with indigenous peoples on initiatives involving TKs.
6. Provide direction to all agency staff, researchers and non-indigenous entities.
7. Recognize the role of multiple knowledge systems.
8. Develop guidelines for review of grant proposals that recognize the value of TKs, while ensuring protections for TKs, indigenous peoples, and holders of TKs.
TEK priorities: Southern Rockies LCC example
Integrating TEK to the strategic plan
Adopting in whole, or in part, the DOI ACCCNRS draft guidelines for considering traditional knowledges as part of our guiding principles
Identify high-level priority resources with cultural/TEK value to Great Basin tribes
Criteria/balancing factors
Strategic Plan implementation and adaptation
Guiding Principles
Great Basin LCC Goals
Provide leadership and a framework linking science and management to address shared ecological, climate, and social and economic issues across the basin.
Focus science and management actions to sustain natural resources in the context of changing environmental conditions.
Enhance collaboration to integrate science and management among Great Basin LCC partners particularly as related to climate change and other landscape-scale change agents.
Promote communication and education.
Todd Hopkins
Provide leadership and a framework linking science and management to address shared ecological, climate, and social and economic issues across the basin.
Objective: Develop landscape‐level information that can be used to focus conservation programs on the priority elements of the landscape most sensitive to change.
Objective: Evaluate and synthesize existing technical information, and identify and support the generation of information needed to fill gaps.
Objective: Support the development of scientific information, tools and technical products to inform and augment conservation decisions and actions by natural resource managers.
Objective: Coordinate application of geospatial and other information management technologies as necessary to plan, monitor, and evaluate activities and outcomes at various eco‐regional scales.
Todd Hopkins
Focus science and management actions to sustain natural resources in the context of changing environmental conditions.
Objective: Identify and facilitate the development, integration, and application of social and natural scientific information needed to inform water, land, fish, wildlife, and cultural heritage management decisions.
Objective: Monitor landscape scale indicators, test scientific assumptions, and evaluate effectiveness of conservation actions to inform adaptive management
Todd Hopkins
Support the exchange of western and traditional science to further basin conservation priorities and directly benefit tribal issues and circumstances.
Objective: Encourage dialogue on shared conservation goals between indigenous and non-indigenous agencies, institutions, and traditional practitioners, informed by the DOI ACCCNRS guidelines for considering traditional knowledges and other best practices
Objective: Develop models for engagement of tribal membership and traditional practitioners of TEK
Objective: Apply Protocols to ensure protection of TEK and strategies to protect treaty rights and trust resources
Todd Hopkins
Science and management needs
Defining the long list
Valued resources (focal species, key
habitats)
Drivers of change, related to climate or
climate change, affecting these resources
Management actions to address these drivers
Source docs and needs inventory
Online exercises
24
6/12/2014GBLCC S-TEK Working Group
Ecoregional organization
•Central Basin &
Range
•Northern Basin &
Range
•Snake River Plain &
Middle Rockies
•Sierra Nevada
•Eastern Cascades
Primary Climate Drivers Secondary Climate Drivers
North Pacific Landscape Conservation Cooperative Climate Change Impact Matrix
Valued natural and
cultural resources Atm
osph
eric C
ompo
sitio
n
Air
tem
pera
ture
Pre
cipi
tatio
n
Sea
Lev
el
Sto
rms
Oce
an C
onditio
n
Flood
s/Dro
ughts
Hyd
rolo
gic
Reg
ime
Mar
ine C
urre
nts
Mar
ine W
ater
Qua
lity
Fresh
Wat
er Qual
ity
Glacier
Mas
s Balanc
e
Geo
mor
phic C
hange
Inva
sive
s, D
iseas
e, P
ests
Fire R
egim
e
Phe
nolo
gy
Total
Valued natural and
cultural resources
Habitats Forest 2 9 11 0 2 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 12 4 12
Alpine 1 6 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 6
Lowlands 0 3 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 4
Islands 0 1 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5
Riparian 1 3 5 1 0 0 7 9 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 9
Lake/Wetland 1 6 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 6
River/Stream 1 7 7 0 1 0 8 15 0 0 9 3 6 1 2 1 15
Marine Shoreline 0 1 0 12 6 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 12
Marine Nearshore 0 1 1 7 4 3 0 0 4 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 7
Estuaries 1 0 3 12 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 1 5 0 0 0 12
Groundwater 0 1 5 1 0 0 4 10 0 1 4 0 1 0 1 1 10
SpeciesMarine Mammals 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 5
PopulationsLand Mammals 0 5 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 5
Seabirds 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Land/water birds 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3
Anadromous Fish 1 3 2 1 1 4 5 12 3 4 10 0 1 1 2 0 12
Forage fish 0 0 0 3 1 3 0 2 3 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 3
Ground/rockfish 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Herps 0 2 2 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 3
Shellfish/Invertebrates 0 1 1 3 1 6 0 1 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 6
Epiphytes 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
OtherBiological Communities 2 8 5 3 1 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 8 3 6 8
Food Webs/Productivity 2 5 5 2 2 4 2 1 1 2 2 0 0 6 1 4 6
Connectivity 1 5 4 2 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 5
Carbon Storage 2 3 3 1 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 6 0 6
Traditional Resources 2 4 5 5 1 2 2 4 0 2 3 1 0 2 4 2 5
Sites 1 2 2 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 6
Total 2 9 11 12 6 6 8 15 4 4 10 4 6 11 12 6Courtesy North Pacific
LCC
Low scores are RED, high scores are
GREEN
Impact matrix example
Courtesy North Pacific LCC
Impact matrix results
(“short list”)
RED, shows total points,
BLUE shows scoring
participation
27
6/12/2014GBLCC S-TEK Working Group
Change agents/drivers
Val
ue
d r
eso
urc
es
“Impacts Matrix” exercise:Identify important topics for NPLCC to address (criteria focused on resource management relevance)
Phase 2: prioritization
“Long list” of needs
“Short list”
“Short List”:Top Ranked Driver- Resource Pairs
S-TEK Working Group evaluates all pairs using criteria/balancing factors
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Topic X
Topic DTopic CTopic BTopic A
Priority Score
Phase 3: determine priority topics
Science priorities
“Short list”