GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne)...
-
Upload
collin-knight -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne)...
![Page 1: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
GRAVITATIONAL WAVESFROM ACCRETING NS
A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne)
1. X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising kHz sources!
2. Thermal mountains & r-modes3. Magnetic mountains: GW spectrum 4. Precession & superfluid circulation
![Page 2: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
NS SPINS IN LMXBs
• Low-mass ~ MSun X-ray binaries: disk accretion
• kHz oscillations in thermonuclear X-ray bursts• Simultaneous pulses → stellar spin• Much slower than breakup (Chakrabarty et al. 03)
breakup
narrow rangeRXTE timing
fNS
LX
![Page 3: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
GW “STALLING”
• GW torque f balances accretion torque dM/dt)Rdisk
1/2 (Wagoner 84; Bildsten 98)
• Minimum quadrupole moment
• Narrow range of f since NGW f (steep!)
• BUT rad’n pressure → Nacc < 0 (Andersson et al. 05)
Promising sources (e.g. Sco X-1):
known period, sinusoidal, persistent & strong!
2/52/1
1Sun
98
Hz300yr10
/10
f
M
dtdM
![Page 4: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
I. THERMAL MOUNTAIN
• Lateral T • e capture (A,Z) → (A,Z1) • Occurs at lower in hot
spots (Bildsten 98)
• “Wavy” capture layers →
• (A,Z) & heating gradient ↔ T ↔ thermal conductivity & nuclear reaction rate
![Page 5: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Is large enough?• Elastic crust adjusts
→ reduces • Need T/T ≈ 5% at
base of outer crust• Slow conduction &
cracking (shear < NkT), so persists
GW correlated with thermal X-rays
N core
SF core
LMXB data
(A,Z)
heat)
(Ushomirsky et al. 00)
![Page 6: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
II. r-MODES
• Rossby waves continuously excited in core (Andersson et al. 99); cf. ocean r-modes (Heyl 04)
• Amplitude (→ ) set by shear modulus, normal-superfluid friction (Lindblom & Mendell 99), boundary layer viscosity (Bildsten & Ushomirsky 00), radial crust-core coupling (Levin & Ushomirsky 01)
• Thermal instability (Levin 99)
Quiescent LX ~ 1034 erg s-1 from NS transients, e.g. Aql X-1… not seen! (Brown & Ushomirsky 00)
![Page 7: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Onset of instability(Bildsten & Ushomirsky 00)
VBL + normal core
Thermal runaway cycle(Levin 99)
VBL + superfluid core
no VBL
MSPs
newly born NS
accreting NS
1
r-mode grows2
3 GW losses
4
![Page 8: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
III. MAGNETIC BURIAL
• Polar accretion • Equatorward spreading
• Hydro pressure balanced by tension in compressed equatorial B:
×B)×BP = 0
• Flux freezing → ds /|B|• Need 10-5MSun (cf. Brown &
Bildsten 98)
B
10-5MSun
10-8MSun
(Payne & Melatos 04)
B
![Page 9: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
GW SIGNAL
• Magnetic mountain → → wave strain hc
• Integrate for one yr
• Resistivity, sinking…
• Magnetic moment ↓ (see NS binaries)
• Predict h -1
10-8MSun
10-2MSun
LIGO I
LIGO II
(Melatos & Payne 05)
![Page 10: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Is this (distorted) magnetic field unstable? No!
Parker instability “already” happened (and line tying)
PARKER“BLISTER”
mass & fluxloss < 1%
“DRAINAGE”
![Page 11: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
MHD OSCILLATIONS
• Perturb in Zeus 3D: “sloshes” stably for 2500 TAlfven
• Alfvén mode (slow) frequency depends on Ma
• Sound mode (fast) frequency independent of Ma
Sun
![Page 12: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
GW SPECTRUM
f
h+ hLIGO ILIGO II
2f
fd3Ixz/dt3
2fd3Ixy/dt3
x y
z
t
☺
☺
![Page 13: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
PRECESSION
Magnetic mountain inclined to
• Precession undamped: GW near f and 2f
• Precession damped: e3 → , no X-ray pulses, GW at 2f only (if triaxial)
Excitation• Disk-magnetosphere torque (Jones & Andersson 02)
• Near-zone magnetic dipole torque (Melatos 00)
![Page 14: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
IV. SUPERFLUID CIRCULATION
• Rotation in sphere drives meridional circulation• Time-dependent & asymmetric at high Re ~ 1011
• Precession: asymmetric KE of fluid → GW
torque
Re=104
EKMANPUMPING
![Page 15: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• 3-dim superfluid hydro code (HVBK theory)
• GW near 2f broadened by Ekman & precession
STREAMLINES
KE SURFACEuu= const
(t) FFT →f
QUADRUPOLE
![Page 16: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
SUMMARY
• LMXB spins → GW “stalling” if ≈ 108
• Thermal & magnetic mountains & r-modes• Detectable by LIGO II• Spectrum broadened by (MHD) oscillations• Precession
• Accretion by SN fallback? (Watts & Andersson 03)
• Surface asymmetry after r-p burning? (Jones 05)
![Page 17: GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ACCRETING NS A. Melatos, D. Payne, C. Peralta, M. Vigelius (U. Melbourne) 1.X-ray timing → LMXB spins → GW “stalling” → promising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062308/56649ef45503460f94c08011/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Gone!