Grasslands as Natural Infrastructure in South Africa

11
Grasslands as Natural Infrastructure in South Africa Stanley Liphadzi, PhD Water Research Commission South Africa

description

Grasslands as Natural Infrastructure in South Africa. Stanley Liphadzi, PhD Water Research Commission South Africa. Water Security . “An efficient way to invest in water security is to protect it at its source through prudent land management” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Grasslands as Natural Infrastructure in South Africa

Grasslands as Natural Infrastructure in South Africa

Stanley Liphadzi, PhD

Water Research CommissionSouth Africa

Water Security • “An efficient way to invest

in water security is to protect it at its source through prudent land management”

• The Maloti Drakensburg mountains are the most strategic water resource in the country and region. • The catchments contribute to a number

of major rivers on South African side and Lesotho.

A water scarce country

It is economically justifiable toinvest in water – a limited resource

Precipitation

Evaporation

Roles of the Grasslands • Rainfall infiltrations,

and thus:– Reduce Stormflows – Increase Baseflows– Reduce erosions

• Carbon sequestration• Biodiversity, thus :– Increase tourism, job

opportunities, wealth creation, etc

Scenarios of the two catchments

Upper Thukela• less degraded upper

quinaries• The middle and lower

quinaries were degraded due to:– Overgrazing– Winter wild fires

Upper Umzimvubu• All quinaries were

extremely degraded;– Overgrazing– Winter wild fires

The land use practices and lack of proper management resulted in the degradation of the catchment areas

Legal mandate for a Trade System

There is a legislation supportingDWAF or other designated suppliers to charge Water Users for the enhancement of water services.

DWAF Water Pricing Strategy–Water users can be

charged for resources management (interventions)

AIMS

• To determine if it’s viable and sustainable for the recipients of the benefits from grasslands to pay or compensate land owners/users for their stewardship role.

• How to cost action and Value benefits associated with management.

Tools and InstrumentsHydrological Modeling of Ecosystem Services SUPPLY• Effect of land use and

management on the water services from Ecosystems:– Baseflows– Streamflows– Stormflows– Sediments yield, etc

• Assumption is : services are owned by land owners

Economic modeling of Ecosystem Services TRADE• What are COSTS of change in

land use?– Restoration costs– Management costs

• What is the Economic VALUE OF THE BENEFITS of such change?

• Unit Reference Values (URVs) to determine economic feasibility of a project

Output

Key issues• Implementation of PES is possible in South Africa

• Working for Water and Working for Wetlands programmes have proved that.

• Strong Partnership and collaboration between government depts, land owners, NGOs, Local authorities, and other users (beneficiaries) are important.

• Proper governance structure is needed.• Address the triple bottom line (social justice,

ecological sustainability, and economical feasibility);• Avoid “one size -fit –all”

Acknowledgement

• Mander, M and co- authors of the report : INR, UKZN.

• John Dini – Working for Wetlands / W for Water: SANBI

• Water Research Commission of South Africa• Session Organizers

Thank you