Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

19

Transcript of Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

Page 1: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)
Page 2: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

• Linking graph to function prescription• Different kinds of reasoning according to context?

Bullet from canon slowing down

Pressure in water vs depth

Graphing a function

Page 3: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

Projections of spatial figures – preferences and interpretation (with Johan Deprez)

Preference by teachers, students, as a function of- Age- Experience- Purpose / tasl

Page 4: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)
Page 5: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

Research introduction

Ellen Van Twembeke

Katie Goeman

Luc De Grez

Jan Elen

Page 6: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)
Page 7: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

How to improve adult learners’ persistence in blended learning programmes?

Page 8: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

PROGRAMME DESIGN

AL PERSISTENCE IN BLENDED LEARNING (BL)

COMMUNITY BUILDING

SELF-REGULATED LEARNING (SRL)

Literature review

Inventory of SRL interventions on AL persistence in BL

Conceptualization of persistence

Literature review

Cross-case analysis

Current state of EU/FL retention policy and AEC practice

Input for descriptive design guidelines

Re-engineering of blended learning programmes

Page 9: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)
Page 10: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

Review

Description Current State

Analysis Current State

Identification gap to be targeted

Pre-test

Intervention

Post-test

Real-life problem

Descriptive framework

Self-regulation

Instructional Design

Instruction Learner behaviour

Self-regulation

Instructional Design

7 attributes Identified

(submitted)

First principles(Merrill, 2013)

Level of self-regulationDetermines survivalin BL-environment

(Lynch & Dembo, 2004)

No ready-to-apply modelsFor the design of BL

(Smith & Ragan, 1999)

7 attributes +

First principles Observations F2F (Jorgensen, 1989)

and Online (Bowen, 2009)

Self-report (Burnard, 1991) and

Log-file analysis (Jansen, 2006)

1

2

3Design Based Research(Wang & Hannafin, 2005)

Page 11: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

Review

Description Current State

Analysis Current State

Identification gap to be targeted

Pre-test

Intervention

Post-test

Real-life problem

Self-regulation

Instructional Design

Instruction Learner behaviour

Self-regulation

Instructional Design

7 attributes Identified

(submitted)

First principles(Merrill, 2013)

Level of self-regulationDetermines survivalin BL-environment

(Lynch & Dembo, 2004)

No ready-to-apply modelsFor the design of BL

(Smith & Ragan, 1999)

7 attributes +

First principles Observations F2F (Jorgensen, 1989)

and Online (Bowen, 2009)

Self-report (Burnard, 1991) and

Log-file analysis (Jansen, 2006)

1

2

3Design Based Research(Wang & Hannafin, 2005)

Descriptive framework

Page 12: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)
Page 13: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

Play your way into math!Towards an instructional design model for game-based learning in vocational secondary education.

Sylke Vandercruysse - Jan Elen

Page 14: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)
Page 15: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

Additional Study (November 2015)

• Based on previous studies: the ‘optimal’ GBLE for VSE students will be designed

• A final pre-test post-test quasi-experimental study will be conducted

Comparing a condition using the most optimal GBLE with a regular non-game based instructional approach

Page 16: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

ALL DETAILS?

PhD-Defense on December 18th, 2015 at 16.00

@KULAK Kortrijk

Datum onder voorbehoud van akkoord door de examencommissie

Page 17: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)
Page 18: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

Jan Elen(Eline, Fien)

Goal

Learners

Intervention / Learning Environment

assessment

SylkeWendyDawitMadoStijnEllenMauroCindyMarieTina

context Teacher educationDisposition to teach evidence-informed

Designed

Actual behavior

Pre-service

Page 19: Graphical representations in kinematics, physics, and math (with Mieke De Cock)

Room VHI 04.69