GRADING CURVE1.doc
-
Upload
bilal-ahmed-barbhuiya -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of GRADING CURVE1.doc
-
7/27/2019 GRADING CURVE1.doc
1/11
GRADING CURVES:
20 mm Maximum Aggregate size :( Road Note No.-4 RRL, U.K)
Percentage Passing
Sieves(IS) 0.1
5
0.
30.6 1.2 2.4 4.8 10 20 40 75 100
Curve(4)1.5 12 27 34 42 48 75
10
0
10
0100 100
Curve(3) 0 5 21 28 35 42 65 100
Curve(2)0 3 14 21 28 35 55
10
0
Curve(1)0 2 9 16 23 30 45
10
0
1
-
7/27/2019 GRADING CURVE1.doc
2/11
Grading Curves
2
12
34
42
48
75
100 100 100
0
5
21
35
42
65
100
03
14
21
28
35
55
100
02
9
16
23
30
45
100
27
100
28
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
IS Sieve Sizes
%P
assing
Curve(4) Curve(3) Curve(2) Curve(1)
GRADING CURVES:
30 mm Maximum Aggregate size :(Derived from Road Note No.-4 RRL, U.K)
2
-
7/27/2019 GRADING CURVE1.doc
3/11
Grading Curves
4
14
25
32
40
48
68
88
100 100 100
1
8
19
26
33
41
58.5
83.5
100
0
5
13
19
26.5
33.5
49.5
79.5
100
02.5
8
14
20.5
27
40.5
75
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
IS Sieves
%P
assing
Curve(4) Curve(3) Curve(2) Curve(1)
Percentage Passing
Sieves(IS) 0.1
50.3 0.6 1.2 2.4 4.8 10 20 40 75 100
Curve(4)3.5
13.
525 32 40
47.
5
67.
5
87.
5
10
0100 100
Curve(3) 1 8 19 26 33 41 58.5
83.5
100
Curve(2)0 5 13 19
26.
5
33.
5
49.
5
79.
5
10
0
Curve(1)0 2.5 8 14
20.
527
40.
575
10
0
3
-
7/27/2019 GRADING CURVE1.doc
4/11
GRADING CURVES:
40 mm Maximum Aggregate size :( Road Note No.-4 RRL, U.K)
Percentage PassingSieves(IS) 0.1
5
0.
30.6 1.2 2.4 4.8 10 20 40 75 100
Curve(4)5 15 23 30 38 47 60 75
10
0100 100
Curve(3)2 11 17 24 31 40 52 67
10
0
Curve(2)0 7 12 17 25 32 44 59
10
0
Curve(1)0 3 7 12 18 24 36 50
10
0
4
Grading Curves
5
15
23
30
38
47
60
75
100 100 100
2
11
17
24
31
40
52
67
100
0
7
12
17
25
32
44
59
100
0
37
12
18
24
36
50
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
IS Sieves
%P
assing
Curve(4) Curve(3) Curve(2) Curve(1)
-
7/27/2019 GRADING CURVE1.doc
5/11
Mix-Design (IS-METHOD)
Design stipulations:
1) Characteristic Compressive Strength (fck) :
2) Maximum size of Aggregates (MSA) :
3) Degree of workability:
a) Compacting Factor :
b) Slump :
4) Degree of Quality control :
5) Type of Exposure :B) Test Data for Materials:
1) Cement Used-------- Type :
5
-
7/27/2019 GRADING CURVE1.doc
6/11
Grade :
Date of Manufacture :
2) Specific gravity of Coarse Aggregate :
3) Specific Gravity of Fine Aggregate :4) Water absorption of Coarse Aggregate :
5) Water absorption of Fine Aggregate :
6) Free surface Moisture of Coarse Aggregate :
7) Free surface Moisture of fine Aggregate :
6) Sieve Analysis:
Grading of Coarse aggregate :
Grading of fine aggregate :
C) Target Mean Strength of concrete (Fm=fck + k.S):
Where k=1.65 & S=Standard deviationD) Selection of Water-Cement ratio :
E) Selection of water & sand Content :
Sand Content as per Table 42 of IS :
Water Content as per Table 42 of IS :
Change in Condition (if any) Adjustment required in
(See Table 44) Water content (%) % Sand in total
Aggregate
i) For decrease in w/c ratio by
______________________
ii) For increase in compacting
Factor by________________
iii) For sand conforming to zone
(III/IV)
_________________________________
Total:
Required sand content:-
Required water content:-
F) Determination of Cement Content:
Water-Cement ratio Selected:
Water = Lits.
Cement=---------= kg/Cum.
Cement as per the durability requirement:
G) Determination of Coarse & Fine aggregate:
W M Y
6
-
7/27/2019 GRADING CURVE1.doc
7/11
Amount of entrapped Air=
V= (w + C/Sn + 1/p fn /Sfn ) 1\1000 for fine aggregates
V= (w + C/Sn + 1/ (1-p) fn /Scn ) 1\1000 for Coarse aggregates
Where
V= absolute volume of fresh concrete
(i.e., gross volume in m3 Volume of Entrapped air)
W=Mass of water per m3 of concrete in Kg.
C =Mass of cement per m3 of concrete in Kg.
Sn=specific gravity of cement, say 3.15
p =ratio of fine aggregate to total aggregate by absolute volumefn, C n= total quantity of fine & Coarse Aggregate per m
3 of concrete respectively in Kg
Sfn, Scn= specific gravity of saturated surface dry fine & coarse aggregate, i.e. 2.6 and 2.7
respectively
Mix-proportion (weigh Batching):-
Water Cement Fine aggregate Coarse aggregate
(Lits) (Kg/Bag) (Kg) (Kg)
Original:
DLBD : ------- ---------
7
-
7/27/2019 GRADING CURVE1.doc
8/11
(Kg/Lit)
Mix proportion in lits. (Volumetric batching):-
Original:
Adjusted:
APPROXIMATE AIR CONTENT
Nominal maximumsize
of aggregate,mm
Entrapped air,percentage
of volume of concrete
10
20
40
3.0
2.0
1.0Source: IS10262-1982
8
-
7/27/2019 GRADING CURVE1.doc
9/11
APPROXIMATE SAND AND WATER CONTENT PER M3 OF CONCRETE Source: IS10262-1982
Changes in condition Adjustment required in
Water content Sand in total
aggregate
For sand conforming toZone-I, Zone-II or Zone-IV
of IS:383-11970
Increase or Decrease in the
value of compacting factor
by 0.1
Each 0.05 increase or
decrease in free water-
cement ratio
for rounded aggregate
0
3 percent
0
-15kg/m3
+1.5%for Zone-I-1.5% for Zone-II
-3% for Zone-IV
0
1 percent
-7 percent
ADJUSTMENT OF VALUES IN WATER CONTENT AND SAND PERCENTAGE FOR CONDITIONS
OTHER THAN THE TABLE ABOVE Source: IS10262-1982
9
Nominal Maximum
size of Aggregate in
mm
Water content per m3
Of concrete in kg
Sand as percentage of
total aggregate by
absolute volume
For grades upto M35
208
186
165
200180
40
35
30
2825
10
20
40
For grades above M35
10
20
-
7/27/2019 GRADING CURVE1.doc
10/11
GRADING CURVES:
25 mm Maximum Aggregate size :( Road Note No.-4 RRL, U.K)
Percentage Passing
Sieves(IS) 0.15 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.4 4.8 10 20 40 75 100
Curve(4) 2.5 12.75 26 33 41 47.75 71.25 93.75 100 100 100
Curve(3) 0.5 6.5 20 27 34 41.5 61.75 91.75 100
Curve(2) 0 4 13.5 20 27.25 34.25 52.25 89.75 100
Curve(1) 0 2.25 8.5 15 21.75 28.5 42.75 87.5 100
Grading Curves
2.50
12.75
26.00
33.00
41.00
47.75
71.25
93.75
100.00 100.00 100.00
0.5
6.5
20
27
34
41.5
61.75
91.75
100
0
4
13.5
20
27.25
34.25
52.25
89.75
100
02.25
8.5
15
21.75
28.5
42.75
87.5
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
IS Sieves
%P
assing
Curve(4) Curve(3) Curve(2) Curve(1)
10
-
7/27/2019 GRADING CURVE1.doc
11/11
11