G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

56
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Supreme Court of the Philippines En Banc - M A N I L A GLORIA MACAPAGAL-ARROYO, Petitioner, -versus- G.R. No. 199034 Hon. LEILA M. DE LIMA, et al., Respondents. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X JOSE MIGUEL T. ARROYO, Petitioner, -versus- G.R. No. 199046 Hon. LEILA M. DE LIMA, et al., Respondents. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X JUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR., (C/o Engr. Benjamin V. Floro, #23 Saluysoy, Meycauayan City, 3020 Bulacan; incumbent De Jure RTC, Br. 73, Malabon Presiding Judge by virtue of SC En Banc Resolution dated 12 April, 2011 and Destiny vis-à-vis Fate & Faith ) Petitioner-in-Intervention. For: Intervention, etc. X-------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------X Verified Petition (With Leave of Court) for Intervention and Urgent Omnibus Motions I. For Leave of Court, to Docket, Admit and Grant Petitioner’s Intervention Case, and Motion for Leave of Court to Pay Docket-Legal Fees ; and in the Alternative, to Waive Payment of Docket Fees and Permit Intevenor to Litigate as Pauper (having been Jobless Judge in pretend world since July 20, 1999, the longest suspension in history or 12 years and 3 months), II. To Note, Consider and Include in the Judgment, Petitioner’s Letter-Concurring and 1

description

Verified Petition (With Leave of Court) for Intervention andUrgent Omnibus Motions – G.R. No. 199034

Transcript of G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Page 1: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Supreme Court of the Philippines

En Banc - M A N I L A

GLORIA MACAPAGAL-ARROYO, Petitioner, -versus- G.R. No. 199034Hon. LEILA M. DE LIMA, et al., Respondents.X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -XJOSE MIGUEL T. ARROYO,Petitioner, -versus- G.R. No. 199046Hon. LEILA M. DE LIMA, et al.,Respondents.X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -XJUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR., (C/o Engr. Benjamin V. Floro, #23 Saluysoy, Meycauayan City, 3020 Bulacan; incumbent De Jure RTC, Br. 73, Malabon Presiding Judge by virtue of SC En Banc Resolution dated 12 April, 2011 and Destiny vis-à-vis Fate & Faith )Petitioner-in-Intervention. For: Intervention, etc.

X-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

Verified Petition (With Leave of Court) for Intervention and Urgent Omnibus Motions –

I. For Leave of Court, to Docket, Admit and Grant Petitioner’s Intervention Case, and Motion for Leave of Court to Pay Docket- Legal Fees; and in the Alternative, to Waive Payment of Docket Fees and Permit Intevenor to Litigate as Pauper (having been Jobless Judge in pretend world since July 20, 1999, the longest suspension in history or 12 years and 3 months),

II. To Note, Consider and Include in the Judgment, Petitioner’s Letter-Concurring and Dissenting Opinion (which Predicts the Fate, Faith & Destiny of PGMA and this Honorable Court vis-à-vis the P-Noy Presidency [WE, with bated breath, await “the”/“its” Termination, that is, the Prophet says (per the Ultimate Pink and Violet Lights, He is not pre-destined to finish his term!): this is impeccably foretold in the SC Twin (Intervention) Pleadings (Annexes “A, A-1”) filed by Judge Floro on February 4 & March 5, 2010 (in G.R. No. 191002, etc., Arturo M. de Castro vs. JBC, et al.; inscribed therein is the foretold Prophecy on the Faith / Fate of President GMA, her Successor, P-Noy, the Chief Justice and the Forthcoming Dire Pains, Horrible Deaths, Famine, Disasters, Suicides, Accidents, Global Millennium Earthquakes, inter alia,

1

Page 2: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

vis-à-vis the 38 Visions-Apparitions of/to Judge Floro of the Blue Madonna, etc. vis-a-vis this standoff case ),

Download this Pleading:

Chief Justice Renato C. Corona, and the MEMBERS, En Banc, Supreme Court, Padre Faura, Manila.

Your Honors,

COMES NOW, the undersigned petitioner-in-intervention, Judge

Florentino V. Floro, Jr. (hereinafter referred to as intervenor "Judge Floro,"

for brevity), as concerned citizen, taxpayer and litigant, by himself and for

himself, AND WITH LEAVE OF COURT, most respectfully states:

Opening Statement

Respondents, in the (legal) battle field: Terrorizing the Supreme Court

Legal and virtual NONSENSE : (Like-a-goldfish Filipino TV News Host)

Arnold Clavio remarked that Tele Novelas (like “Amaya” and “Kokak” would

end soon due to the prime time 24/7 soap opera called “Gloria and Di-Lema”.

The respondents are continuously intimidating not only the Supreme

Court Justices but even the entire Judicial Department, saying, that they will

dance “Tinikling” in the streets and would make “Sumbong” to their Gods, if

the petitioner PGMA will stubbornly and repeatedly violate the copyright law

[by making “Putong” upon her neck to head, the 3 kilos metal brace-Crown

(which is, but a duplicate of Minita Viray Chico Nazario’s Damocles Sword

hanging on Judge Floro’s head since July 20, 1999, when her Honor, Flerida

Ruth-Romero, as her swan song signed the CURSED SC Resolution suspending

the 3 mystic dwarves LUIS, Armand and Angel, for ordering Judge Floro to

inflict illness, horrible, slow and painful deaths, car accidents, mystic fires and

even psychic suicides upon his crab mentality “enemigos”)].

Sino po ba namang Pilipino ang hindi matatakot! Kahit sa karsada,

mabubulagta ka na lang: a) on October 7, 2011, about 11:00 a.m., the son of ex-

SC Justice Jose Vitug, at the Padre Faura main road, told me that cancer healer

2

Page 3: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

nun, Sister Raquel Reodica, RVM, miserably failed to heal the metastasis

(cancer) of his sister-in-law, “tepok” daw; and b) when I asked the chief of

staff [of ex-JBC Member Atty. J. Conrado Parado Castro (who was abducted by

the space ship of LUIS on the Super Moon dawn of 4:00 a.m. to Neverland at

the 3 duendes’ Kingdom at Osaka, Japan and Jupiter)] to receive copy of my

Motion for Reinstatement (for her new “amo” JBC Member MARIA

MILAGROS FERNAN-CAYOSA), I did sense that she was so afraid of the

epidemic encircling the Court’s corridors of power; she stated that Fridays

Healing Masses are being held for my Ateneo Law School Class 1982

classmate DCA Nimfa Cuesta-Vilches afflicted with Pancreas Stage IV

(metastasis), one of the most dreaded illness.

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion

FLORO, J.:

The Prophecy: (Not) Strictly Politics - Vengahan ng Vengahan, Open

Display of Power, Fate-Survival of Benigno Simeon Cojuanco Aquino III,

Physical Hurting of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo (Coinciding with

her Irreversible Downfall on the 5th of November, 2011, the 58th Natal Day

of Mystic Judge Florentino Floro, who was bestowed on that day the

Ultimate Pink Lights, the most powerful in the entire universe in addition

to the Ultimate Violet light of Annihilation) and the Faith/Suffering of the

Filipino Nation vis-à-vis Conditional Global Annihilation, 1999-2012.

When Judge Floro's 12 years suspension case (A.M. No. RTJ-99-1460,

"OCAD vs. Judge Florentino Floro") was called (on the morning of April 12,

2011, or just 11 days from April 1, 2011 when his “Supplemental Omnibus

Motion for Reinstatement”, inter alia” was filed, and exactly 5 years and 3

hours after Luzviminda Delgado Puno died in pain at St. Luke's Hospital, just 5

days after the Court released the March 31, 2006 promulgated Cursed Minita

Viray Chico-Nazario 75 pages "Psychosis" dwarf Judgement), it was clear that

not one among the members of this Court was suggesting that that intervenor

3

Page 4: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Judge Floro has no constitutional rights that this Court must vigilantly protect.

No one was saying that Judge Floro should not be granted any remedy. The

bone of contention before the Court was, simply, whether to allow Judge Floro

his right to due process by giving him the right to continue in office as de jure

Judge or to accept his alternative and conditional offer of resignation after full

reinstatement, with full payment of back wages, economic and other legal

benefits, under the law and settled jurisprudence. On this matter, the vote of this

Court was unaminous (Annex I), as the SC En Banc Resolution of April 12,

2011, did GRANT Judge Floro's "Supplemental Omnibus Motion for

Reinstatement, inter alia" dated 1 April, 2011(Annex II).

A. The Right of the State to be Heard

versus the Right Claimed by

Petitioners vis-a-vis the Mystic

Curse of the 3 duendes, LUIS,

Armand and Angel (12 years

longest suspension in world history

– Ultimate Pink & Violet Light,

from Jupiter & Osaka, Japan)

The Rules of Court and jurisprudence prescribe very stringent

requirements before a Judge can be suspended or removed from service.

Among these is the requirement under A.M. NO. 01-8-10-SC that Judges of

lower courts can only be displined after the requirements of filing of complaint,

answer, investigation and reports are duly complied with by the OCAD.

A Complaint or Memorandum Report (filed by Justice Alfredo L.

Benipayo et al., who is now suffering the massive stroke) that contained false

charges can have many consequences among which are: (a) the co-conspirators

can suffer cancer or massive stroke, inter alia, under the Golden Rule of

Karma, (b) the person making the false testimony can be punished under the

"curse" jurisprudence for contempt of the 3 duendes, placing a stain in their

blood up to the 4th generation and (c) the person making the false submissions

4

Page 5: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

can be punished by abduction of outer space ships resulting to car accidents,

horrible, slow and painful deaths, including psychic suicides.

On December 8, 1998, Judge Floro displayed in his Br. 73, RTC,

Malabon sala the written prediction of “Erap will not finish his term” (Annex

D). This written document is just 6 meters beside the Br. 74, RTC, Malabon

Sala of Judge, now SC Justice Bienvenido L. Reyes. Ponente, Justice Minita

Viray Chico-Nazario ruled:

"xxx. It is weird for respondent Judge to state in one of his pleadings in

this case that President Estrada would not finish his term as President.

It is unusual and queer of him to state in his calling card that he is a

graduate of Ateneo de Manila, second honors, bar topnotcher with a

grade of 87.55%. xxx. As narrated by the audit team, Judge Floro was

circulating calling cards bearing his name as the Presiding Judge of

RTC, Branch 73, Malabon City, and indicating therein that he is a "bar

exams topnotcher (87.55%)" and with "full second honors" from the

Ateneo de Manila University, A.B. and LL.B. xxx.”

http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2006/mar2006/am_rtj-99-

1460_2006.html (“OCAD vs. Judge Floro”)

On October 10, 2000, Judge Floro, upon cross-examination questions by

witness and by Acting Investigator Romulo S. Quimbo, replied that “Erap will

remain this year, but next year (2001) he will not finish his term! (Annex “M,

M-1”).

On January 9, 1999, 6:00 a.m., the feast of the Black Nazarene of

Quiapo, Manila, Judge Floro was bestowed the divine vision of a), b) global

apparitions of the Virgin Mary and global millennium earthquakes from 1999-

2012, and c) VP Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo would be badly hurt. On the 3rd

Friday of June, 2001, Judge Floro released this prophecy, entitled “The Gifts of

Prophecy and Spiritual Healing dated Good Friday”, 13 April 2001, Annex D-

1) to SC Justice Consuelo Ynares-Santiago (the mastermind of Judge Floro’s

dismissal according to Atty. Mario Ongkiko, and) soon afer Erap failed to finish

5

Page 6: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

his term on January 20, 2001. Forthwith, petitioner PGMA suffered her 1 st

hurting: “GMA, hurting, alarmed” (Annex D-2, PDI: the Marcelo scam,

December 8, 2001).

On June 20, 2003, Judge Floro filed his “C.J. Davide Impeachment”

Motion to Lift Suspension, inscribing therein the prophecy of the fate of

PGMA, FVR & Jose de Venecia (Annexes H, H-1 & H-2). Judge Floro

repeatedly inserted in his 2003-2004, Motions to Lift Suspension (among the

more than 60 Motions to Lift Longest Cursed Suspension he filed), the

irreversible downfall of PGMA which would coincide with her physical

hurting.

On August 29, 2003, Judge Floro undertook his 7 th journey to Paoay,

Ilocos Norte and stood still 7 meters off the very name “Conchita Claudio

Carpio” plate hanging at the house of Don Lucas Carpio and cursed the entire

place and house (Annex “L-3”). He filed the nth Motion to Lift Suspension

asking the Ponente SC Justice Conchita Carpio-Morales to grant Judge Floro

plain mercy. Judge Floro, in his 6th Journey to Paoay, predicted the appointment

of both Morales and Callejo on August, 2002 (Annex C).

On December 7, 2003, Judge Floro wrote his DOS MIL TRES

PROPHECY of “Visions of Pains” dated 7 December, 2003 Motion to Lift

Suspension (Annex I).

Judge Floro, on June, 2004, intervened in the certiorari lawsuit

regarding the opposition Koalisyon ng Nagkakaisang Pilipino (KNP) per Davao

City Rep. Ruy Elias Lopez, to stop a joint session of Congress from canvassing

the votes for president and vice president. Floro asked the Court to declare a

failure of elections and order the COMELEC to conduct special presidential

elections. Floro also asked the Supreme Court to declare Noli de Castro as

acting President, as Solomonic solution to the political crisis.

In the Fernando Poe, Jr. presidential candidate disqualification case,

Floro was reported as "Espiritistang Judge Ididipensa si Da King." (Bagong

6

Page 7: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Tiktik February 17, 2004), "Psychic Phenomena gagamitin sa FPJ Case."

Manila Standard Today, on February 24, 2004, reported - "Poesition" papers

were submitted by intervenor Judge Florentino Floro for FPJ, and by his

classmate Victorino Fournier against FPJ for his disqualification.

Judge Floro repeatedly wrote in the FPJ pleadings: "Bago na ang

Presidente sa 2004!" (this predictions was repeatedly written in more than 2

Motion to Lift Suspension filed on 2003)(G.R. No. 161434, March 3, 2004,

Tecson vs. Comelec). Ominous sign: before the start of the oral argument,

Tecson passed 7 inches off Judge Floro - On September 28, 2007, 8:30 p.m,

Senior Superintendent Francisco Uyami, Pasig police chief stated that Maria

Jeanette Tecson, 40, a lawyer, was found dead (in a state of rigor mortis) inside

room 204 at the Richmond Hotel, San Miguel Avenue, Pasig City (with her

throat slit and with cuts on her wrist).

B. Respondent's Counsel, Jose Anselmo I. Cadiz,

Solicitor General, Must Explain Why He Is

Claiming That The State's Constitutional

Right Is Being Violated, When The 2003

Claimed Violation By Judge Floro Was

Caused By His Own IBP Administrative

Issuance-Denial Of Judge Floro's On Bended

Knees Letters-Appeals for Justice I & II

On September 10 & 19, 2003, Judge Floro repeatedly asked IBP President

Jose Anselmo I. Cadiz, for audience. Cadiz refused and failed to grant mercy to

the on bended knees plea for compassion of Judge Floro. Judge Floro filed the

“Letters Appeals for Justice I & II” (“Annex J, K”). Judge Floro merely asked

the IBP to write to the Court to decide Judge Floro’s case, just that. Cadiz

passed by Judge Floro, 2 meters off, and never gave the dwarf Judge a damn

chance to be heard. An IBP Resolution denying Judge Floro’s Appeal was

issued and mailed to Judge Floro. The 3 duendes burned them and cursed the

IBP Presidency.

7

Page 8: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

To a certain degree, the doctrine on equitable estoppel should guide the

hand of this Solicitor. In its simplest sense, estoppel prevents a Cadiz from

disclaiming his previous act, to the prejudice of Judge Floro who relied on the

representations created by such previous act: “E, 2 klase ba ang batayan ng

Hustisya? Kapag may 3 duende ka, di ka papatulan ng IBP? E, worst, it was

the guiding palms of Pura Angelica Santiago, the daughter of SC Justice

Ynares-Santiago, who did influence Anselmo in ruling negative for the duende

Judge. Multo ng Legal Karma sa kaniyang opisina, bilang successor ng

pinakamalupit na OCAD Adminstrator at former SolGen Alfredo Logronio

Benipayo, and takot na bumabalot sa puso niya! ", remarked Judge Floro. “The

logic behind the doctrine comes from the common societal value that a person

must not be allowed to profit from his own wrong", wrote MARIA LOURDES

P. A. SERENO, Associate Justice (dissenting opinion, in these cases). Put

differently, the 3 dwarves did cast a mystic imprecation upon the Office of the

Solicitor General way back when Benipayo was in bad health thereat. For now,

and just for this time, to use same argument against Petitioner PGMA must

necessarily fail.

Thus, the acts which respondent’s counsel, Cadiz, claims to have

violated the State’s constitutional rights are the acts of its Solicitor, and

consequently, its own, under the rule on temporal punishment under Canon Law

and the Law of Moses, including the 3 immutable laws of curse, karma and

spell of the 3 duendes.

[Judge Floro also filed on bended knees “Letters-Appeals” that his case be

decided by the Court, to a) the PJA, dated September 5 & October 23, 2003, 1 st

& 2nd Letters-Appeals, and b) the Ateneo, ALAFI, dated September 19, 2003,

Annexes “K, L-1, L ”].

C. The Ponente Chico-Nazario Faced The Risk Of

"Divine Retribution" Frontally, And Failed To

Ensure The 3 Duendes That She Was Not

Unduly Favoring Davide, Jr., Teresita

8

Page 9: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Cruz-Sison & Alfredo L. Benipayo To

The Prejudice Of The Mystic-Jobless Judge,

And To Have Done This, She Failed to Allow

The Helpless Magistrate To Be Heard Before

The Cursed Dismissal Judgment & Appeals.

The court cannot evade the question that is uppermost in the minds of

many – is the Chico-Nazario 75 pages Judgment a good or bad law? Was it

driven by Atty. Teresita Cruz-Sison’s desire to get even, after Judge Floro did

predict her massive stroke before JBC Member Justice Campos and published

to Dr. Cecilia Villegas, Psychiatrist, on September 19, 1998? Why did C.J.

Davide, Jr. opted to consult "Spirit Questors" regarding the recurring and

lingering illnesses of his brothers Jorge and Jose, who both died on 2004,

including the never ending pain of his father Hilario, Sr. who died after the

dwarf Decision was released, because of the Decision of the Avengers, LUIS,

Armand and Angel? Why did Alfredo Logronio Benipayo evade the

investigatory and judicial process (2 disbarment cases filed by Judge Floro

against them as co-conspirators) regarding their liabilities for certain alleged

criminal acts? If the risk of flight, then, by petitioner PGMA is high, then this

Court must adopt either of the following approaches: (1) grant the right to

travel, and (2) to allow prosecution after the term of P-Noy, just these options,

nothing more, period. Petitioner PGMA cannot obtain justice from the

Ombudsman and Sandiganbayan, during the P-Noy term, for her investigation

and trial would be moro-moro, a farce, so to speak.

On November 3, 2006, Judge Floro filed with the Court and submitted an

Original pleading with the Office of Justice Nazario Biblically Imprecating the

Justices based on Psalms 109 and 73 (PDI, “Psychotic Judge enlists help of 3

dwarfs against SC”, Annex “G”.

On December, 2006, Judge Floro wrote and published his first book, when

he wrote the death of Rod Nazario, inter alia, on page 359 (Annex “F”): “LUIS

to Nazario: Mark my work, she will regret it!” Forthwith, Rod Nazario,

9

Page 10: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

husband of Justice Minita suffered heart by-pass and was inflicted cancer by the

3 duendes on 2007, expiring on September 23, 2009 due to metastasis, or Stage

IV Cancer.

On December 14-20, 2006, Judge Floro, on bended knees filed several

applications for work, job and trabajo, to the offices of: his classmates, Rene

Tale, DOJ Rene Tale, DOJ Leo Dacer III+, Usec. Atty. Manuel Gaite, Mayor

Jerry P. Trenas, State Counsel, respondent Ricardo Paras III; and based on the

Letter of Exec. Sec. E. Ermita’s, E. Perez, Judge Floro, filed many letters

searching for work to the offices of Cerge M. Remonde, Margarito B. Teves,

Raul M. Gonzalez, Aquilino Q. Pimentel, Alberto G. Romulo, Sen. Kiko

Pangilinan, Sen. Jamby A.S. Madrigal, Sen. Manny Villar, President Erap

Estrada per Cong. JV Bautista; all these were done, after Judge Floro’s requests

for Job, were turned down by his own counsel, Rene AV Saguisag and Comelec

Chair Benjamin Abalos (Annexes “E, E-1 to E-8”).

Fortunately, all of them or their loved ones did suffer what petitioner

PGMA is suffering now, in one way or another, depending on the dish or menu

of the 3 duendes. Put differently, a revolving health curse is caused by the

ultimate Violet light of LUIS, the King of kings of elementals in the universe.

“Florentino says he predicted Joseph "Erap" Estrada's

presidential downfall and prayed that present incumbent

Gloria Macapagal Arroyo would survive her endless political

battles. Looking ahead, he reckons Arroyo's power will end

soon and the nation will suffer as a result.”

http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?

pp_cat=30&art_id=26375&sid=9641493&con_type=3

Florentino and the three dwarves, Saturday, September 02, 2006, The

Standard, Hong Kong (Annex “__”).

10

Page 11: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

IN VIEW THEREOF , I vote to: (a) grant the right to travel, and (b) to

allow prosecution of PGMA after the term of P-Noy, just these options, nothing

more, nothing less, period. Petitioner PGMA cannot obtain justice from the

Ombudsman and Sandiganbayan, during P-Noy’s term, for her investigation

and trial would be moro-moro, a farce, so to speak.

Attribution: The format and many sentences were borrowed from the

Dissenting Opinion of Justice Sereno. Judge Floro states that this pleading, like

all his pleading since 1996, are all CODED (writen in cryptology, that is, the

secret events that will happen are inserted therein via the ultimate Violet lights).

Motion to Declare Null and Void, the a) COMELEC En Banc Resolution

(upholding the DOJ-Comelec panel report)-Election Sabotage Charges

dated 18 November, 2011, b) the Order and Warrant Arrest dated 18

November, 2011, issued by Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas.

Urgent Motions – a) to Join/Include as Nominal Party, Br. 112, RTC,

Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas (under Sec. 11, Misjoinder and Non-

Joinder of Parties, Rule 3, Rules of Court) and b) to Join-Add-Consolidate

all other Necessary-Related Causes of Actions Pending in any other Courts

or Tribunals in these consolidated cases (under Rule 135, Sec. 5, Inherent

powers of courts), to prevent mockery of justice, and multiplicty of suits.

On November 18, 2011, at 10:00 p.m. Senate President Juan Ponce

Enrile delivered a long lecture upon Pastor Quibuloy, live via Channel 39.

Enrile said the the Supreme Court has the final say on the case of PGMA. He is

partly true, since Judge Floro already wrote the Prophecy and Fate both of

PGMA, P-Noy vis-à-vis the High Tribunal in his Intervention in the landmark

cases of “Arturo M. De Castro vs. JBC, et al.” (February, 2010, Annexes I, II).

Enrile added that the Executive and Judicial Departments must coordinate, and

he remarked that there must be a reaching out between the President and the

Chief Justice.

11

Page 12: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Such reaching out can happen only in land of fruits and nuts. For it is

written by the Prophet and Angel of Death, that only the Ultimate Violet Light

of LUIS, which is being flashed, solely pens the past, present and future in this

drama anthology. Not even the stars and the moon can inscribe any chapter of

this legal standoff, wise or otherwise.

History teaches PGMA and her enemies how to play the game: a)

Marcial Bonifacio was used by Ninoy against Marcos, but the former was

slaughtered right at the place where PGMA did dream on November 15, 2011

to fly high to Singapore and conduct her psychic travels to other parts of the

planet to evade punishment. In other words, she is arguing against her destiny,

which was already carved by Judge Floro, way back in 2003-2005, when the

JBC repeatedly, that is, 7 times nominated Justice Alfredo L. Benipayo. Judge

Floro repeatedly filed Motions to Lift Suspension and told the Court:

“The nomination of Benipayo by the JBC and the submission of his

name to the President initiate the downfall of the 14 th President or

rather the 15th, since FPJ is the de jure …!”

At this juncture, Judge Floro requests this Court to take judicial notice of

the fact that his 91% in Criminal Law Procedure (under Dean Antonio L.

Gregorio, Ateneo Law School, Annex “____”) is a standing 10 years unbroken

record (from 1975-1985 by 10 Ateneo Valedictorians) qualifies him to be

considered a legal luminary in the field of Criminal Procedure. With that, Judge

Floro writes the following master thesis on the gross ignorance of the law and

gross misconduct of Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas vis-à-vis the

mockery of judicial process by some Members of the COMELEC En Banc.

This Court, in the case of Demetria, formulated the rule that mere

newpaper reports can be the basis of administrative case against Magistrates.

[EN BANC, A.M. No. 00-7-09-CA. December 19, 2001, In Re: Derogatory

News Items Charging Court of Appeals Associate Justice Demetrio G. Demetria

with Interference on Behalf of a Suspected Drug Queen: Yu Yuk Lai

12

Page 13: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2001/dec2001/am_00_7_09_ca.htm]

The following news reports (on the fact and timeline of COMELEC

En Banc Resolution upholding the DOJ-Comelec panel report-Election

Sabotage Charges dated 18 November, 2011, b) the Order and Warrant Arrest

dated 18 November, 2011, issued by Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus

Mupas) are set forth, to prove - that what Brillantes and Mupas did, are not only

a) gross violations of their Lawyer’s Oath of Office (“to do justice to every

man”), but their actuations rendered the b) Charges, the Orders and Warrants of

Arrests, as 100% scraps of papers, duly cursed. A law student from Harvard

Law School at Pampanga, coached by a smart Ateneo Law School Class 1982,

another Blue Eagle, with Royal Blood, can easily comprehend these “balita”:

“Crown o’ thorns” - this “Minerva brace” should be worn for three months, St.

Luke Hospital doctors say. In his 1967 essay “Tyranny of the Urgent,” Charles

Hummel warned: “Our greatest danger is letting urgent things crowd out the

important.”

Timeline – Judicial Sabotage

“The Commission on Elections decided, by a 5-to-2 vote, to file poll

sabotage charges against GMA.”

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/96741/time-of-visitation-spurned

Time of visitation spurned?

By Juan Mercado Cebu Daily News Saturday, November 19th, 2011

*****

“PGMA lawyers just filed an urgent motion questioning the jurisdiction

(of the Pasay City Regional Trial Court) and that’s the first thing that should be

hurdled first. They said the charges should be have been filed before the

Ombudsman and the Sandiganbayan, taking into consideration that Arroyo is a

government official.

13

Page 14: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Even before the warrant was issued, it would be impossible for the judge

to read the charge in two days. The judge would have to be a “superman” to be

able to read the entire document filed by the DOJ-Comelec panel.”

http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?

articleId=749721&publicationSubCategoryId=63

GMA camp denounces railroading

By Paolo Romero (The Philippine Star) November 19, 2011

*****

"The Comelec also railroaded its own resolution because

Commissioner [Armando] Velasco had said that he took no part because he

wanted time to study the joint panel resolution before voting. That meant the

Comelec voted to charge Mrs. Arroyo with electoral sabotage even without

reading the joint panel resolution. The Comelec ruling was highly questionable

since the credibility of Comelec chairman Sixto Brillantes and Justice Secretary

Leila de Lima was suspect, considering they were lawyers for the opposition

during the Arroyo administration.”

http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/insideNews.htm?f=2011/november/19/

news6.isx&d=2011/november/19

Gloria allies question Comelec’s intensions by Maricel Cruz, Saturday,

November 19, 2011

*****

"It was impossible for a judge to assess and render a decision on the

charges within one day. This recommendation of the Comelec has to be

presented in court which will carry out its own assessment and analysis to

judicially determine the existence of probable cause. The evidence is so thick

that even the two commissioners (of the Comelec) were not able to finish

reading it.

As it happens, Pasay RTC Judge Jesus Mupas, to whom the case was

raffled, ordered the arrest of Arroyo at 4.30 p.m. Police went to St. Luke’s

14

Page 15: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Hospital in Taguig City where Arroyo is confined and served the arrest warrant

at 6.30 p.m.

The Comelec had set a meeting at 9 a.m. or two hours before the SC en

banc. The independence of the Comelec, an independent constitutional body,

had been tarnished for taking part in the “railroading” of the case.

“They filed these charges in this court simply as a matter of expediency in

order to obtain the arrest warrant. This is a clear violation of the president’s

human rights by this government.”

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/96617/gloria-arroyo-lawyers-moro-moro-de-lima-

justice-served

Gloria Arroyo lawyers: ‘Moro-moro’; De Lima: Justice served

By Christian V. Esguerra, Niña Calleja Philippine Daily Inquirer Saturday,

November 19th, 2011

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/19/world/asia/philippines-arrests-ex-

president-gloria-macapagal-arroyo.html

Philippines’ Ex-President Is Arrested on Fraud Charges

By FLOYD WHALEY November 18, 2011

*****

November 18, 2011

7 a.m. - "And though he was reportedly sick Comelec Chairman Sixto

Brillantes left the hospital to preside over an en banc session. Brillantes called

for an emergency meeting at 7 a.m. on Friday and the resolution was approved

by a vote of 5 to 2. Commissioners Armando Velasco and Lucenito Tagle, both

Arroyo appointees, abstained from the vote. Velasco said there wasn't enough

time to make an informed decision. “I'm not yet ready to decide on the merits

kasi nakikita ko voluminous ‘yung records kaya mahirap naman na pabigla-

bigla ang desisyon,”said Velasco.

Tagle only saw the Department of Justice (DOJ)-Comelec panel report

earlier Friday. He wonders why an emergency meeting was called only hours

before the Supreme Court tackled the Arroyo travel issue. “We preempted the

Supreme Court, dapat hinantay muna,” said Tagle.

But Comelec Commissioner Rene Sarmiento admitted that the

possibility of former President Arroyo leaving the country forced their hand.

15

Page 16: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

“May manifest attempt to leave the country so this was factored by the en banc.

So we have to resolve right away ‘yung kaso,” said Sarmiento."

http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/11/18/11/comelec-possibility-gma-flight-

forced-decision

Comelec: Possibility of GMA flight forced decision

by Anthony Taberna, ABS-CBN News 11/18/2011

*****

11:26 a.m. – The Comelec-DOJ panel investigating the alleged massive

election cheating in the 2007 senatorial elections filed election sabotage

charges against former President Arroyo, former Maguindanao Governor

Andal Ampatuan Sr. and former Comelec election supervisor Lintang Bedol.

The Comelec asked for a hold departure order against the three.

11:54 a.m. – Comelec Chairman Sixto Brillantes Jr. said the poll body did not

rush in deciding to file the electoral sabotage charges. He said the joint panel’s

recommendations were received by the Commission on Nov. 16.

12:12 p.m. – Electoral sabotage case was raffled off to RTC Branch 112 Pasay

Judge Jesus Mupas.

1:16 p.m. – The high court, voting 8-5 in a special en banc session, stays and

reiterates the TRO it issued last Tuesday.

3:25 p.m. – Lacierda said the TRO is not yet final and executory because

Arroyo’s legal team has yet to comply with some conditions stated in the TRO.

4:04 p.m. – Pasay Regional Trial Court Judge Br. 112, Jesus Mupas found

probable cause in the complaint filed in his sala and issued warrants of arrest

against Arroyo, Ampatuan, and Bedol.

4:09 p.m. – Pasay court turned over arrest warrants to the Pasay City police.

National Capital Region Police Director then ordered the Southern Police

District to serve the warrants of arrest on Arroyo at the St. Luke’s Medical

Center in Bonifacio Global City, Ampatuan at the Bicutan detention facility,

and Bedol at the Philippine National Police (PNP) Custodial Center in Camp

Crame.

Atty. Joel Pelicano, Clerk of Court of Pasay RTC 112, said Judge Jesus

Mupas found probable cause after Arroyo was charged with electoral sabotage

by the Commission Elections (Comelec). “Kapag may kaso na isinampa at na-

16

Page 17: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

raffle sa isang branch, ang gagawin ng husgado ay alamin kung may existence

of probable cause to issue a warrant of arrest for the court to acquire

jurisdiction over the person of the accused,” explained Pelicano.

Pelicano said a hold departure order (HDO) is only a motion and will be

issued if found meritorious by the court. He said the issuance of a HDO will be

deliberated on Monday.

Meanwhile, the Arroyo camp filed an urgent omnibus motion to hold in

abeyance the issuance of warrant of arrest against the former president.

However, Judge Mupas had already left when the motion was filed. The motion

will also be discussed on Monday.

Aside from the former President, Mupas also issued arrest warrants for

former Maguindanao Gov. Andal Ampatuan Sr. and former election supervisor

Lintang Bedol Friday morning.

-- Report from Dexter Ganibe, radio dzMM

http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/metro-manila/11/18/11/nothing-unusual-

gma-arrest-warrant-court

Nothing unusual with GMA arrest warrant: court

abs-cbnNEWS.com 11/19/2011

*****

President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo has asked the Pasay Regional

Trial Court (RTC) to suspend its proceedings on the electoral sabotage case

filed against her, saying the Sandiganbayan, and not the RTC, should have

jurisdiction over the case.

The Arroyo camp filed a consolidated and urgent motion before the

sala of Pasay RTC 112 Judge Jesus Mupas, asking the court to suspend the

proceedings and objecting to the judge's issuance of an arrest warrant against

Arroyo. The motion noted that the anti-graft court, Sandiganbayan, should have

jurisdiction over the case considering that Arroyo was a public official when

the alleged crimes were committed. It also objected to the issuance of an arrest

warrant, saying Arroyo's right to due process was violated by the arrest order.

The NBI team is using unmarked vehicles to make the trip from Manila to

Taguig City.

17

Page 18: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Lambino said that the case should have been lodged before the

Sandiganbayan because Mrs. Arroyo, who is now serving as representative of

Pampanga's 2nd district, is a public official.

http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/11/18/11/gma-files-objection-arrest-

warrant

GMA files objection to arrest warrant

abs-cbnNEWS.com 11/19/2011 11:44 AM

*****

4:25 p.m. – Justice Secretary Leila de Lima said Mrs. Arroyo is compelled to

remain in the country to face electoral sabotage charges.

4:33 p.m. – Arroyo decided not to proceed to the NAIA, canceled Singapore

Airlines flight reservations.

6:30 p.m. – Arroyo was arrested on electoral sabotage charges filed before the

Pasay Regional Trial Court by the Comelec and DOJ.

- Sr. Supt. James Bucayu led the Southern Police District (SPD) team that

served the warrant of arrest on the former President while she lay on the

hospital bed in St. Luke’s Medical Center in Taguig.

- In the hospital room was the former First Gentleman Jose Miguel Arroyo and

Arroyo’s legal team. The SPD posted two personnel outside the hospital room

to stand guard and keep Arroyo in police custody.

- Bucayu said the arresting team read the contents of the arrest warrant to

Arroyo who, upon her lawyers’ advice, waived the reading of the former

President’s rights as an accused in a criminal case—also known as Miranda

rights.

- Bucayu also said the other steps in the booking process, including the taking

of the mug shots and fingerprinting will be done the next day at the hospital at a

convenient time for the former President.

http://www.gmanews.tv/story/239005/nation/ex-pres-arroyo-arrested-timeline-

of-day-that-was

Ex-Pres. Arroyo arrested: Timeline of day that was

11/18/2011

*****

18

Page 19: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

“University of the Philippines Professor Prospero de Vera and political

strategist Malou Tiquia told ANC that what happened on Friday shows the

country still has a weak democracy. They believe that the filing of a court case

against Arroyo was rushed just to prevent her from traveling abroad. "The

political spectacle and telenovela is a sad commentary on our political

institutions and worst on our political leaders," de Vera said. "This is the worst

phase of democracy... the way it should not be. "Unfortunately because of the

decision of executive, they had to end up to potential crisis situation, even

ordinary citizens are divided," she said. "Napaka-dangerous nangyari."

Senator Francis Escudero agrees that due process was followed, but

he thinks the timing of the electoral sabotage case is questionable.

Senator Edgardo Angara, meanwhile, believes that the government is defying

the Supreme Court's decision. "Dapat ang sinunod dito ay ang mataas na korte

at hindi ang lower court," he said. The case filed by the joint Commission on

Elections and Department of Justice panel in Pasay appeared as an

“afterthought” in the face of the legal argument Arroyo could not be barred

from leaving without being formally charged in court. The panel was hoping

that the Pasay Regional Trial Court would immediately issue an arrest warrant

against the ex-President, who is facing a nonbailable offense. “You cannot cure

an unauthorized ban simply by filing a case after. It may be interpreted as an

afterthought,” Angara told reporters.

Asked if the RTC judge could issue a hold departure order on Arroyo

on the same day that the electoral sabotage case had been filed, Angara said in

Filipino: “I think it would be much of a harassment already if that happens.”

Majority Leader Vicente Sotto III hailed the SC en banc decision affirming its

TRO and requiring De Lima to show cause why she should not be cited in

contempt for defying its order. “The decision in favor of the right to travel is an

affirmation of the rule of law for all, without fear or favor,” he said. “I salute

the Supreme Court. I’m sure the executive department was expecting that. In

basketball, the DOJ is committing a violation called forcing through.”

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/96547/senators-divided-over-electoral-sabotage-

case-vs-arroyo

Senators divided over electoral sabotage case vs Arroyo

19

Page 20: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

By Christian V. Esguerra Philippine Daily Inquirer Friday, November 18th,

2011

http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/11/18/11/judiciary-executive-battle-

worries-analysts

Judiciary-executive battle worries analysts

abs-cbnNEWS.com 11/19/2011

*****

Gross misconduct, professional indiscretion and gross ignorance of the law.

“Rule 3.01, Canon 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct mandates that a

judge shall be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence. Indeed,

competence and diligence are prerequisites to the due performance of judicial

office. 5 Section 3, Canon 6 of the New Code of Judicial Conduct requires

judges to maintain and enhance their knowledge and skills to properly perform

their judicial functions, thus:”

http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/february2011/MTJ-09-1737.html

A.M. No. MTJ-09-1737 Conquilla vs Judge Bernardo February 9, 2011

*****

Petitioner additionally scores on the fact that respondent Sandiganbayan

issued the warrant for his arrest based solely on the 2nd June 1992 Resolution

of the Office of the Ombudsman and the 16th January 1995 Memorandum of the

Office of the Special Prosecutor. He has a point. The issuance of a warrant of

arrest is one of grave responsibility on the part of the issuing judge. While the

judge need not himself examine the complainant and his witnesses, he, however,

must personally evaluate the report and supporting documents submitted by the

prosecutor regarding the existence of probable cause and, only on the basis

thereof can he validly and correspondingly issue a warrant of arrest.

The judge may, if he finds it needful, require the submission of

additional affidavits of witnesses or papers to aid him in arriving at a

conclusion on the existence or absence of probable cause. In Ho vs.People, the

Court, positing that the issuing judge must have sufficient supporting

documents, besides the bare report of the prosecutor, upon which to make an

independent judgment, has said:

20

Page 21: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

"x x x (T)he judge cannot rely solely on the report of the prosecutor in

finding probable cause to justify the issuance of a warrant of arrest. Obviously

and understandably, the contents of the prosecutor's report will support his own

conclusion that there is reason to charge the accused of an offense and hold

him for trial. However, the judge must decide independently. Hence, he must

have supporting evidence, other than the prosecutor's bare report, upon which

to legally sustain his own findings on the existence (or nonexistence) of

probable cause to issue an arrest order. This responsibility of determining

personally and independently the existence or nonexistence of probable cause is

lodged in him by no less than the most basic law of the land. Parenthetically,

the prosecutor could ease the burden of the judge and speed up the litigation

process by forwarding to the latter not only the information and his bare

resolution finding probable cause, but also so much of the records and the

evidence on hand as to enable His Honor to make his personal and separate

judicial finding on whether to issue a warrant of arrest."

The point is: he cannot rely solely and entirely on the prosecutor's

recommendation, as Respondent Court did in this case.

Although the prosecutor enjoys the legal presumption of regularity in the

performance of his official duties and functions, which in turn gives his report

the presumption of accuracy, the Constitution, we repeat, commands the judge

to personally determine probable cause in the issuance of warrants of arrest.

This Court has consistently held that a judge fails in his bounden duty if he

relies merely on the certification or the report of the investigating officer."

http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1998/dec1998/134307_vitug.htm

CONCURRING OPINION, VITUG, J.:

Cojuangco Jr vs Sandiganbayan - J. Vitug's Opinion: 134307

*****

The judicial determination of probable cause, on the other hand, is one

made by the judge to ascertain whether a warrant of arrest should be issued

against the accused. The judge must satisfy himself that based on the evidence

submitted; there is necessity for placing the accused under custody in order not

to frustrate the ends of justice. If the judge finds no probable cause, the judge

cannot be forced to issue the arrest warrant.

21

Page 22: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/june2009/171188.htm

June 19, 2009 People vs. Castillo, J. Quisimbing

*****

“Section 6(a), Rule 112 of the Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure

clearly provides: SEC. 6. When warrant of arrest may issue. — (a) By the

Regional Trial Court. — Within ten (10) days from the filing of the complaint or

information, the judge shall personally evaluate the resolution of the prosecutor

and its supporting evidence. He may immediately dismiss the case if the

evidence on record clearly fails to establish probable cause. If he finds

probable cause, he shall issue a warrant of arrest, or a commitment order if the

accused has already been arrested pursuant to a warrant issued by the judge

who conducted the preliminary investigation or when the complaint or

information was filed pursuant to section 7 of this Rule. In case of doubt on the

existence of probable cause, the judge may order the prosecutor to present

additional evidence within five (5) days from notice and the issue must be

resolved by the court within thirty (30) days from the filing of the complaint or

information.

Pursuant to the aforementioned provision, the RTC judge, upon the filing of an

Information, has the following options: (1) dismiss the case if the evidence on

record clearly failed to establish probable cause; (2) if he or she finds probable

cause, issue a warrant of arrest; and (3) in case of doubt as to the existence of

probable cause, order the prosecutor to present additional evidence within five

days from notice, the issue to be resolved by the court within thirty days from

the filing of the information.

It bears stressing that the judge is required to personally evaluate the

resolution of the prosecutor and its supporting evidence. He may immediately

dismiss the case if the evidence on record clearly fails to establish

probable cause.”

http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/december2009/182336.htm

G.R. No. 182336, December 23, 2009, J. Nachura, Ong vs. Genio.

*****

The foregoing (timeline of) judicial sabotage was dramatically

performed by (the conspiracy of highest order in the dwarf Kingdom at Osaka,

22

Page 23: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Japan), Mupas & his Branch Clerk of Court, as Atty. Joel Pelicano, principals

by direct participation, and Brillantes, as co-conspirator.

How could RTC Judge Mupas have issued the Order of Arrest at 4:04

p.m. when the expediente from electronic raffle of 12:12 p.m. was delivered to

his sala about 12:30 p.m.? Even if Mupas did not read the records, still, it would

take more time to draft, type and finalize the Court Order.

OCAD Adminstrator Midas Marques should, therefore, be ordered by

the Court to sequester Mupas at Tagaytay, to attend Newly Appointed Judge’s

Seminars (on the Rules on Criminal Procedure and Legal Ethics).

The Judicial and Bar Council, on the other hand, on its legal conscience,

should issue a TRO valid for 10 years to prevent Mupas from applying for

promotion to the CA or Sandiganbayan.

COMELEC Chair Brillantes on the other hand, must be detained in the

Ospital ng Maynila, pending his review of the Rule 137, Rules of Court, on

Disqualifacation, lest the ghost of FPJ haunt him as it did make “takot” to Ben

Abalos, even if Jun Lozada failed to bewitch this golf pulot boy, who rose from

rags to riches because of his sweet tonque which regulary emits sugar lights,

unlike the eyes and palms of Judge Floro which emit mystic fires that burned

his Comelec Office, the Court of Appeals, RTC Malabon, MTC Muntinlupa

and the Session Hall of the Supreme Court, as the dwarves please.

“With admittedly eight volumes of evidence, affidavits and

documents submitted to the Regional Trial Court of Pasay City, it would

be a Herculean task to wade through the voluminous records and would

be physically impossible for a judge to determine probable cause in less

than four hours to justify the issuance of a warrant of arrest.” The judge

should not follow hook, line and sinker the prosecutor’s certification of a

probable cause. More is required by the constitution. The inordinate and

precipitate haste in the issuance of the warrant of arrest brazenly violates

Section 14 of the Bill of Rights which provides that ‘no person shall be held to

answer for a criminal offense without due process of law.”

23

Page 24: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/11/20/11/lagman-hits-

%E2%80%9Cinordinate-haste%E2%80%9D-gma-arrest

Lagman hits “inordinate haste” in GMA arrest

abs-cbnNEWS.com 11/20/2011 11:56 AM

November 18, 2011

7 a.m. - "And though he was reportedly sick Comelec Chairman Sixto

Brillantes left the hospital to preside over an en banc session. Brillantes

called for an emergency meeting at 7 a.m. on Friday and the resolution

was approved by a vote of 5 to 2. Commissioners Armando Velasco and

Lucenito Tagle, both Arroyo appointees, abstained from the vote. Velasco

said there wasn't enough time to make an informed decision. “I'm not yet

ready to decide on the merits kasi nakikita ko voluminous ‘yung records

kaya mahirap naman na pabigla-bigla ang desisyon,”said Velasco.

11:26 a.m. – The Comelec-DOJ panel investigating the alleged massive

election cheating in the 2007 senatorial elections filed election sabotage

charges …

12:12 p.m. – Electoral sabotage case was raffled off to RTC Branch 112 Pasay

Judge Jesus Mupas.

4:04 p.m. – Pasay Regional Trial Court Judge Br. 112, Jesus Mupas found

probable cause in the complaint filed in his sala and issued warrants of arrest

against Arroyo, Ampatuan, and Bedol.

4:09 p.m. – Pasay court turned over arrest warrants to the Pasay City police.

National Capital Region Police Director then ordered the Southern Police

District to serve the warrants of arrest on Arroyo at the St. Luke’s Medical

Atty. Joel Pelicano, Clerk of Court of Pasay RTC 112, said Judge Jesus Mupas

found probable cause …

6:30 p.m. – Arroyo was arrested on electoral sabotage charges filed before the

Pasay Regional Trial Court by the Comelec and DOJ.

- Sr. Supt. James Bucayu led the Southern Police District (SPD) team that

served the warrant of arrest on the former President while she lay on the

hospital bed…

24

Page 25: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Nature of the Petition-in-intervention

Intervenor Judge Floro, in support of the instant pleading, cites Section 1, Rule 19 of the Rules of Court, which provides: “A person who has legal interest in the matter in litigation or in the success of either of the parties, or an interest against both, or is so situated as to be adversely affected by a distribution or other disposition of property in the custody of the court or of an officer thereof may, with leave of court, be allowed to intervene in the action. The court shall consider whether or not the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the original parties, and whether or not the intervenor’s rights may be fully protected in a separate proceeding.”

Pursuant to the foregoing rule, this Honorable Court has repeatedly held that a motion for intervention shall be entertained when the following requisites are satisfied: (1) the would-be intervenor shows that he has a substantial right or interest in the case; and (2) such right or interest cannot be adequately pursued and protected in another proceeding. As concerned citizen, mystic judge, prophet, visionary, citizen and taxpayer, undersigned intervenor is also deemed to have the standing to raise the instant constitutional issued, for it is ruled in many cases, like in "Kilosbayan vs. Ermita and Gregory S. Ong,” G.R. No. 177721 that, "Petitioners have standing to file the suit simply as xxx taxpayers since the matter involves an issue of utmost and far-reaching Constitutional importance xxx. Standing has been accorded and recognized in similar instances.” (Vide: Francisco, Jr. v. The House of Representatives, G.R. No. 160261, November 10, 2003, 460 SCRA 830; Tatad v. Secretary of the Department of Energy, G.R. No. 124360, November 5, 1997, 281 SCRA 330; Gonzales vs. Narvasa, G. R. No. 140835. August 14, 2000).

The Legal Standing of the Petitioner & The Propriety of this Petition

As mystic judge, prophet, visionary, Petitioner filed this case as a taxpayer and concerned citizen of the Philippines, believing upon his compelling, prophetic and transcendental interest to intervene, based on the 1987 Constitution; further, intervenor has faith, that the current judicial controversy transcends the person, ambition and destiny of the Chief Justice, P-Noy and PGMA, because this matter has far-reaching implications in the quest of truth, justice, and dismissal of corruption. Furthermore, the resurrection of judicial independence, in particular, carries ominous significance in the life of this country. The Eternal Word Television Network of Mother Angelica proclaimed that “One who has access to truth and visions or apparitions and fails to share the same, is guilty of GUILT.” Judicial sabotage of the High Tribuanal and entire Judiciary (by Judge Mupas and COMELEC Chair Brillantes) utterly displays not only gross ignorance of the law, gross misconduct, professional incompetence and indiscretion, but their actuations, if not restrained and punished by this Court of Last Resort, will ultimately, and in no uncertain terms, enlarge in the greatest manner, under the law of karma and spell, the Ombudsman Curse.

25

Page 26: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Transcendental Grounds and Extraordinary Merits-Circumstances of Judge Floro’s Intervention, inter alia

The following evidence of the highest character is submitted in support of his intervention and nominations, thusly:

i) Judge Floro is a visionary, clairvoyant and prophet. He has accurately predicted in his “Angel of Death” 1996 and other editions, more than 800 dire prophecies with impeccability. Since 2008, he had been bestowed more than 38 visions and apparitions of the Virgin Mary and the Eucharist, with vivid images and unequivocal messages duly filed with this Court of last resort.1

ii) Judge Floro accurately predicted in writing the downfall of Erap, angioplasty and massive stroke of Justice Alfredo L. Benipayo, 5 Court Mystic Fires, surgery of Davide, Jr., with 2004 deaths of his brothers Jose and Jorge, and lung cancer death of Diego Gutierrez, the verbal and written predictions of the SC appointments of Justices Corona, De Leon, Jr., Capio-Morales, Callejo, Sr., Teresita de Castro (in Wikipedia), Brion, del Castillo (by phone to Atty. Gregorio M. Batiller, Jr.), Chief Justices Davide, Jr., Panganiban and Puno’s appointment against Quisumbing and Miriam Defensor-Santiago, by 3 hours card reading with Marilyn Puno Santiago, at the most sacred SC Conference hall.2

1 ? http://twitter.com/judgefloro

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118999288641229392.html?mod=psp_free_today

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/5261856.stm

http://www..lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2006/mar2006/am_rtj-99-1460_2006.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Florentino_Floro&oldid=291975074

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Judgefloro&oldid=16482677

http://www.blogger.com/profile/08050768475939438767

2 http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/resolutions/2006/nov/am_2006_24_sc.htm [A.M. No. 2006-24-SC. November 14, 2006] JUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR. v. MRS. MARILYN PUNO SANTIAGO AND JASMIN MATEO Nov 14 2006

http://www.malaya.com.ph/01252010/news11.htmlMONDAY JANUARY 25, 2010

Cerge M. Remonde was the 7th of President Arroyo’s aides who died during her tenure. 9 others have been hospitalized for illness. The other deaths among the Cabinet during the Arroyo administration were political adviser Jose Ma. Rufino Jr., who died of liver cancer, and foreign secretary Blas Ople, who died after a heart attack on board a plane bound for Taiwan. On April 7, 2009, a Bell 412 presidential helicopter carrying four of Arroyo’s trusted officials crashed in the mountains of Ifugao province. They were supposed to prepare the activities for her arrival in the province the following day. Killed in the crash were Jose Capadocia, press undersecretary for operations and media relations, together with

26

Page 27: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

iii) Judge Floro predicted the September 23-24, 2009 dire tragedies - (ROPE) Rod Nazario, lung cancer death after 2006 heart surgery, Ondoy, Pepeng and Global Millennium Earthquakes, Haiti and Chile, World Record Extra-judicial Killings of 30 journalists in Ampatuan Massacre – when the Court, on June 3, 2008, or exactly 25 years after LUIS, Armand and Angel appeared to his brother, Robert, expunged from the Rollo, his Motions to Enthrone- Consecrate the Eucharist and Mary in the 5 mystic fires courts he predicted, including the enthronement of Minita Viray Chico-Narario.

iv) Judge Floro accurately predicted the consecutive deaths of Cerge M. Remonde, Jose Capadocia, press undersecretary for operations and media relations, together with Appointments secretary Marilou Frostrom, surgeries and illnesses of Aquilino Pimentel, Jr., spinal pinched nerves, Alberto Romulo, heart surgery, Raul Gonzalez, kidney transplant, Pryde Teves, bombed grandson of Margarito Teves, after said officers denied Floro’s December 2006 Applications for job, work and trabajo .

v) Judge Floro holds the Ateneo Law School 1975-1985 unbroken record (not duplicated by 10 Ateneo Valedictorians, of 91% in criminal law review under Dean Antonio L. Gregorio, the No. 1 terror professor Ateneo ever had); he placed 12th in the 1983 Philippine Bar Examination, with a very high bar rating of 87.55% in one of the hardest examination in Philippine history (only 21.3% passed; 65% of both Ateneo and University of the Philippines College of Law students failed because of the taxation bar subject). This rating ties with that of SC Justice Antonio T. Carpio.

Appointments secretary Marilou Frostrom, Presidential Management Staff assistant director Perlita Bandayanon, and presidential senior military aide Brig. Gen. Carlos Clet. Also killed were the pilot, Maj. Rolando Sacatani, co-pilot Capt. Alvin Alegata, Clet’s aide Quarter Master 3rd Class Demilyn Reyno, and crewman Sgt. Roe Gem Perez. Serving under the Arroyo government also carries health risks. Gabriel Claudio has resigned as Arroyo’s political adviser to focus on treatment for his worsening congenital scoliosis and compressed spinal nerves, despite having undergone spinal surgery. Raul Gonzalez was replaced as justice secretary and appointed to the less stressful job of chief presidential legal counsel shortly after nearly losing his life from bleeding ulcers brought about by kidney problems. Finance Secretary Margarito Teves once got hospitalized due to pancreatitis, a sign of stress. Foreign Affairs Secretary Alberto Romulo has undergone heart surgery. Monetary Board member Ignacio Bunye suffered from slipped disc when he was press secretary. Emilia Boncodin had a kidney transplant when she was budget secretary. Other Cabinet officials who have undergone medical treatment are: then Executive Secretary Renato de Villa, who underwent heart bypass; then presidential chief of staff Rigoberto Tiglao (and now ambassador to Greece), who also had heart bypass; and former presidential chief of staff and now Supreme Court Justice Renato Corona, who was treated for ulcers, two spinal cord surgeries. Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita and national security adviser Norberto Gonzales have been advised by their doctors to monitor their blood sugar and cholesterol level. – With Regina Bengco

http://www.mainlib.upd.edu.ph/ipn/details.php?id=2006101135960183

27

Page 28: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

vi) Judge Floro became immortal in world history on April 7, 2006.3

“[g]reat cases like hard cases make bad law.” - Northern Securities Co. v. United

States, 193 US 197 (1904),[307](Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., dissenting)

“The 'establishment of religion' clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No person can be punished for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance.”- Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947) Hugo Black

Judge Floro, per his 91% criminal law Ateneo record, is a legal luminary of higher caliber than all the sophisticated legal hypocrites. “Not even Chief Justice Davide, can hold the candle that you … and still you are proud of horses, predictions, healing … I told you to choose … be a judge or a priest …!” Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr.”

PGMA prophecy: The Fate and Faith of the Small President

http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=26375&sid=9641493&con_type=3

Florentino and the three dwarves Saturday, September 02, 2006

Florentino says he predicted Joseph "Erap" Estrada's presidential downfall and prayed that present incumbent Gloria Macapagal Arroyo would survive her endless political battles. Looking ahead, he reckons Arroyo's power will end soon and the nation will suffer as a result.

Greed, anger, hatred, vendetta and ambition – Destiny and Prophecy

8. Erap never imagined that his very own appointees would jail him. When Floro predicted De Leon, Jr.’s appointment per request of Hermosisima, Jr., this nasty De Leon, Jr., who laughed at Floro’s lightning teeth (in 1996 at Dulcinea, Greenbelt chance meet, when the Prophet said, “See you in the Supreme Court!”) - ridiculed Erap in Channel 2 News, as he did bite his last McDo Burger and for 12 hours, Floro was there gazing and dancing-jumping as De Leon, Jr. was operated, suffered and died. Bingo! PGMA does not hold the necks of Justices, when ambitions are there roaming around like the elfs.

Nobody can predict except the Prophet Judge Floro, how the divided votes of SC Justices would be cast in the final hours of Carpio, Corona, and Brion, inter alia, with the dressed in immaculate white de Castro, CJ-spare-tire dark filly-in-waiting. Not even PGMA could predict if she would appoint the Chief Justice. With bated breath let us take a break with this Comedy of Errors:3NBI Deputy Director Gutierrez, 64 passes away May 21, 2002

? http://www.google.com.ph/search?hl=tl&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=3JE&q=judge+florentino+floro&btnG=Maghanap&meta=&aq=f&oq= Resultang 1 - 10 sa halos 184,000 para sa judge florentino floro . (0.09 segundo)

28

Page 29: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Intervenor Judge Floro had and has no illusion that he could even be nominated, but he did file the application on February 4, 2010, so that what he did prophecy to Arturo D. Brion (in 2001 inside his Pandacan home, while eating Art’s pancit canton and NUTS amid Tonette taking one of the 5 Floro Spanish Cards), would be fulfilled, and now he is there as God of Faura, gazing at jobless-homeless Judge Floro’s horrible pleading. Intervenor repeats: “I decided to endure my sufferings, since I was punished by the Supreme Court Justices, for consulting dwarves!” – Judge Floro

February 4, 2010 TV5 Televised Prophecy of Judge Floro on the Chief Justice issue vis-à-vis PGMA and FG Mike Arroyo’s Destiny: The FG Accident on February 18, 2010

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MB2JVdrT0M

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bZ1Z40RBOo

Judge Florentino Floro Eyes Chief Justice Post

February 4, 2010, 26-pages Verified Application for Philippine Chief Justice by Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr.; Judge Floro's Nomination of Atty. Henry R. Villarica, Atty. Gregorio M. Batiller, Jr., SC Associate Justices Arturo D. Brion and Conchita Carpio-Morales - TEN: The Evening News, TV 5, Associated Broadcasting Company, 10:30 - 11:30 p.m., February 4, 2010, No. 3 News (by Andrea Bautista)

There at TV5, Judge Floro said:

“Please do not edit this: PGMA will survive her political battles but in the end she will be hurt no time frame etc. which written prophecy I did publish per HK Standard Sept 2006 and in 2001 per 20 court pleadings in the SC.”

"Judge Floro also issued a PREDICTION on the fate of incumbent President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo whom he opted to be appointed Chief Justice, by: ....."

Judge Floro Prophecy - "xxx in the end, HE (referring to First Gentleman Mike Arroyo who suffered Feb 18 vehicular accident) would be ... he would SUFFER." (2:04 to 2:09)

NOTE that Judge Floro did not commit a grammatical error, but in mystic trance, his voice and speech were altered to prophecy the February 18 FG accident, which is true OMEN of the no time frame HURTING of PGMA.

So, FG Mike Arroyo was badly hurt in accident as OMEN, after Floro’s TV5 Feb 4 TV appearance broadcast, as prefatory to the final downfall of PGMA, and the nation’s greatest sufferings, as Fatima, Lourdes and other Marian Global Apparitions, reiterated conditionally.

29

Page 30: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Mike Arroyo escapes serious injury in car accidentInquirer.net - Tj Burgonio - Feb 18, 2010

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20100218-253924/Mike-Arroyo-escapes-serious-injury-in-car-accident MANILA, Philippines—First Gentleman Jose Miguel Arroyo was slightly hurt in a vehicular accident en route to the Wack-Wack Golf and Country ... Corona and Carpio are both haunted by so many filed JBC oppositions and if a pending case is filed, though barred by the impeachment provisions of the Constitution, then Brion might be the buddy-buddy alter for CJ, of Corona.

The Omen and Stern Warning

A final word. Judge Floro issues a stern warning upon any and all who contradicted and would unlawfully change PGMA’s destiny as prophesied by him in The Standard before Sam Chambers, 2006, re - 2001 prediction on PGMA. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo survived her political battles and is in pain. Look what happened to her tormentors FPJ and Cory Aquino, and to Erap, etc. Newspaper pundits could not explain this, and stated that Gloria was lucky. Erap is finished in political history since his neighbor Bernardo P. Pardo confirmed Flerida Ruth Romero’s suspension of Judge Floro on July 20, 1999. Gloria is not lucky. She is the only President who works 24/7, second only to Ferdinand E. Marcos. She is guided by spirit guides, in the same manner, that Judge Floro is. Benipayo and Nazario would live their lives, and they will never ever forget Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. and the 3 mystic dwares.

“Rod Nazario, the former business manager of Manny Pacquiao, and widely recognized as the man who gave the current pound-for-pound king his break on US soil, passed away at the age of 74 on Thursday morning at the Perpetual Help Hospital in Las Pinas, Metro Manila. Nazario, who became involved in the fight game during the time of Tanny Campo in the 1950s, had been diagnosed with lung cancer last year. Nazario even celebrated his birthday last Sept. 12 and over the weekend, Pacquiao dropped by the hospital and wished him well. Fightnews would like to express its condolences to the family of Nazario.”

http://lib1000.dlsu.edu.ph/search/Y?SEARCH=World-Famous+Mystic&SORT=D&searchscope=19

August 4, 2006 and August 28-29, 2006 - Judge Floro was not allowed to enter the house of Justice Nazario at 9 pm, and she instructed her lawyer, PS, Atty. Tolentino, etc., not to entertain Judge Floro, respectively.

In pages 357/399 of the 404 Pages First Book of Judge Floro, 2006, ISBN 9789716916195 "World-famous Mystic Armand, LUIS and Angel, the Three Dwarves MEET THE JUDGE, Psychic and Healing Martyr or Filipino Justice," LUIS, the King of kings of elementals ordered Judge Floro to write the Prophecy:

http://cid-e76bfff86f9a213f.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/judgefloro%5E_book.pdf

30

Page 31: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

"FINAL WORD OF JUDGE FLORO TO JUSTICE MINITA VIRAY CHICO-NAZARIO” - Cursed 75 pages decision of Justice Minita Viray Chico-Nazario (Annex XXX)

On March 12, 2004, when hope was lost for Justice Nazario, only LUIS through Judge Floro, PUBLICLY, CONSTITUTIONALLY and by SPIRITUAL weapon, fought to enthrone MINITA, as God destined her to be the 15th Supreme Court Justice who would be the instrument to clean the corrupt judiciary and to PEN the landmark Decision which should have championed Justice. But she instead buried the truth awaiting its burial in her tomb. The 2 pages which MARKED her destiny is reproduced hereunder as LIVING proof that LUIS did prophesy her ASCENCION to the GOLDEN THRONE as GODDESS OF FAURA. Nazario's husband Rod, age 74, former Manny Pacquiao manager, passed away on September 24, 2009 after having undergone by-pass operation in 2006 and underwent chemo-therapy for his lung cancer, a day before

typhoon Ondoy devastated the Philippines.”+

Relief

PREMISES CONSIDERED, it is respectfully prayed to this Honorable Court – to Note and Grant the –

Verified Petition (With Leave of Court) for Intervention and Urgent Omnibus Motions –

I To Docket, Admit and Grant Petitioner’s Intervention Case, with Motion for Leave of Court to Pay Docket-Legal Fees ; and in the Alternative, to Waive Payment of Docket Fees and Permit Intevenor to Litigate as Pauper (having been Jobless Judge in pretend world since July 20, 1999 or 12 years and 3 months),

II. To Note, Consider and Include in the Judgment, Petitioner’s Letter-Concurring and Dissenting Opinion (which Predicts the Fate and Destiny of PGMA and this Honorable Court vis-à-vis the P-Noy Presidency (WE, with bated breath, await “the”/“its” Termination, that is, the Prophet says (per the Ultimate Pink and Violet Lights, He is not pre-destined to finish his term!): this is impeccably foretold in the SC Twin (Intervention) Pleadings filed on February 4 & March 5, 2010 (in G.R. No. 191002, etc., Arturo M. de Castro vs. JBC, et al.; inscribed therein is the foretold Prophecy on the Faith / Fate of the Incumbent President GMA, the Next Leader, P-Noy, the Next Chief Justice and the Forthcoming Dire Pains, Horrible Deaths, Famine, Disasters, Suicides, Accidents, Global Millennium Earthquakes vis-à-vis the 38 Visions-Apparitions of/to Judge Floro of the Blue Madonna, etc. vis-a-vis this standoff case ).

III. To Declare Null and Void, the a) COMELEC En Banc Resolution (upholding the DOJ-Comelec Panel Report)-Election Sabotage Charges

31

Page 32: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

dated 18 November, 2011, b) the Order and Warrant Arrest dated 18 November, 2011, issued by Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas,

IV. And to Join/Include as Nominal Party, Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas (under Sec. 11, Misjoinder and Non-Joinder of Parties, Rule 3, Rules of Court) and To Join-Add-Consolidate all other Necessary-Related Causes of Actions Pending in any other Courts or Tribunals in these Consolidated Cases (under Rule 135, Sec. 5, Inherent Powers of Courts), to Prevent Mockery of Justice, Judicial Sabotage and Multiplicty of Suits.

It is further prayed to the Court, that the instant pleading filed by the undersigned be given due course, considered and GRANTED, in view of the extraordinary circumstances above-submitted. Other reliefs and remedies, just and equitable under the circumstances are likewise prayed for.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I signed this pleading, application, nomination – motion, this 18th day, Friday of November, 2011, at Malolos City, 3000 Bulacan, Philippines for Manila, Metro Manila.

Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR.,Petitioner-in-Intervention,

Cel. # 0915-5330008, c/o Benjamin V. Floro , #23 Saluysoy, Meycauayan, 3020 BULACAN,

Tel. # (044) 840-8176[I.D. Number: RTCJ-317 / EDP Number: 38676300; ROLL OF ATTORNEY’S NO. 32800,

Pg. No. 60, Book No. XIV].

VERIFICATION and Certification of Non-Forum Shopping

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES )Malolos City, BULACAN ) S.S.

I, Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr., movant, petitioner, under oath, depose/say, that:

I am the intervenor-movant-petitioner in these cases. I caused the preparation, signed and read the instant pleading, and all the contents/allegations thereof are true and correct of my own personal knowledge or based on authentic records.

I CERTIFY (a) that I have not theretofore commenced any action or filed any claim involving the same issues in any court, tribunal or quasi-judicial agency and, to the best of my knowledge, no such other action or claim is pending therein; (b) if there is such other pending action or claim, I will file a complete statement of the present status thereof, but there is none; and (c) if I should thereafter learn that the same or similar action or claim has been filed or is pending, I shall report that fact within five (5) days therefrom to the court wherein his aforesaid complaint or initiatory pleading has been filed.

Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR.

32

Page 33: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, on this 18th day of November, 2011, here at Malolos City, Bulacan, affiant exhibited to me his CTC NO. CC12005 # 21783592, issued at Malolos, Bulacan, on 2-27, 2010.

DOC. NO. , PAGE NO. , BOOK NO. , SERIES OF 2011.

BERNAR D. FAJARDO Notary Public,

Until Jan.31, 2011, PTR NO. 4048722, 11- 25’10,

Atty.’s Roll No. 33633, IBP OR # 813840, 11-21,’10

MCLE COMP. III0019636, 12- 21-‘10 Malolos, Bulacan, (044) 662-5335 Celp. # 0906-9669792, Secretary

NOTICE and Urgent Request to be Granted a Special, Appropriate Reserved Seat in the Oral Argument as Intervenor

TO: The Clerk of Court, En Banc, Supreme Court, En Banc, Manila,

Please AGENDUM this pleading-motions and submit them forthwith to the Supreme Court, En Banc, upon receipt hereof, for its deliberation and resolution. It is respectfully request that undersigned be Granted a Special, Appropriate Reserved Seat in the Oral Argument as Intervenor.

Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR.

COPY FURNISHED-SERVED:

(By Registered Mail with Return Card): Explanation: Due to lack of messenger, and impracticality, service of copies of this pleading was made by registered mail with return card upon herein parties:

Attys. ESTELITO P. MENDOZA, IVY D. PATDU and HYACINTH E. RAFAEL, Law Office of Estelito P. Mendoza & Associates Counsel for Petitioner in G.R. No. 199034 4th Floor Dynavision Building 108 Rada St., Legaspi Village

33

Page 34: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

Makati City; Tel: +63 281 700 16Fax: +63 2 810 5513; emai: [email protected];

Attys. ANACLETO M. DIAZ, MARIA ROSARIO Z. DEL ROSARIO, CHRISTIAN B. DIAZ and ANALENE V. BALISONG, Law Firm of Diaz Del Rosario & Associates Co-counsel for Petitioner in G.R. No. 199034 6th Floor Padilla Bldg., F. Ortigas, Jr. Road (formerly Emerald Avenue) Ortigas Center, Pasig City Tel: 634 8481,636 1608 Fax: 634 8481

Attys. FERDINAND S. TOPACIO and JOSELITO O. LOMANGAYA, Topacio Law Office Counsel for Petitioner in G.R. No. 199046 Suite 107 Skyway Twin Towers, H. Javier Street, Ortigas Center, Pasig City, Tels: 571-0270; 616-4627 Fax: 571-1626 Email: [email protected]

Office of the Solicitor General Anselmo Cadiz,134 Amorsolo St. Legaspi Village, Makati CityTel. Nos. 818-6381 Fax Nos. 817-6037Email: [email protected] Copies of the Registry Receipts are attached above, while the ORIGINALS of the Registry Receipts are attached with the last pages of the Petition-in-intervention.

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES )City of Malolos, Bulacan ) S.S.

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

I, Judge Florentino Floro, as Petitioner-in-intervention, with residence, address at c/o Benjamin V. Floro , #23 Saluysoy, Meycauayan, 3020 BULACAN, after being duly sworn, depose and say:

That on November 21, 2011, I served copies with annexes of the following pleading/paper by registered mail with return card in accordance with Rule 13, inter alia, of the Revised Rules of Court.Nature of Pleading/PaperPetition-in-Intervention In PGMA vs Leila De Lima, et al. , etc. G.R. Nos. 199034, 199046.

The addressee(s) are as follows:(By Registered Mail with Return Card): Explanation: Due to lack of messenger, and impracticality, service of copies of this pleading was made by registered mail with return card upon herein parties: by depositing the copies with annexes in the Plaridel, Bulacan post office, in sealed envelopes, plainly addressed to the parties or their counsels at their offices, with postage fully pre-paid, and with instructions to the postmaster to return the mail to the sender after ten (l0) days if undelivered, as evidenced by the registry receipts attached herewith.

Attys. ESTELITO P. MENDOZA, IVY D. PATDU and HYACINTH E. RAFAEL, Law Office of Estelito P. Mendoza & Associates Counsel for Petitioner in G.R. No. 199034 4th Floor Dynavision Building

34

Page 35: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

108 Rada St., Legaspi Village Makati City; Tel: +63 281 700 16Fax: +63 2 810 5513; emai: [email protected];

Attys. ANACLETO M. DIAZ, MARIA ROSARIO Z. DEL ROSARIO, CHRISTIAN B. DIAZ and ANALENE V. BALISONG, Law Firm of Diaz Del Rosario & Associates Co-counsel for Petitioner in G.R. No. 199034 6th Floor Padilla Bldg., F. Ortigas, Jr. Road (formerly Emerald Avenue) Ortigas Center, Pasig City Tel: 634 8481,636 1608 Fax: 634 8481

Attys. FERDINAND S. TOPACIO and JOSELITO O. LOMANGAYA, Topacio Law Office Counsel for Petitioner in G.R. No. 199046 Suite 107 Skyway Twin Towers, H. Javier Street, Ortigas Center, Pasig City, Tels: 571-0270; 616-4627 Fax: 571-1626 Email: [email protected]

Office of the Solicitor General Anselmo Cadiz,134 Amorsolo St. Legaspi Village, Makati CityTel. Nos. 818-6381 Fax Nos. 817-6037Email: [email protected] Copies of the Registry Receipts are attached above, while the ORIGINALS of the Registry Receipts are attached with the last pages of the Petition-in-intervention.

Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR., affiant

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, on this 21st day of November, 2011, here at Malolos City, Bulacan, affiant exhibited to me his CTC NO. CC12005 # 21783592, issued at Malolos, Bulacan, on 2-27, 2010.

DOC. NO. , PAGE NO. , BOOK NO. , SERIES OF 2011.

BERNAR D. FAJARDO Notary Public,

Until Jan.31, 2011, PTR NO. 4048722, 11- 25’10,

Atty.’s Roll No. 33633, IBP OR # 813840, 11-21,’10

MCLE COMP. III0019636, 12- 21-‘10 Malolos, Bulacan, (044) 662-5335 Celp. # 0906-9669792, Secretary

35

Page 36: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

I. To Declare Null and Void, the a) COMELEC En Banc Resolution (upholding the DOJ-Comelec Panel Report)-Election Sabotage Charges dated 18 November, 2011, b) the Order and Warrant Arrest dated 18 November, 2011, issued by Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas.

II. To Join/Include as Nominal Party, Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas (under Sec. 11, Misjoinder and Non-Joinder of Parties, Rule 3, Rules of Court) and To Join-Add-Consolidate all other Necessary-Related Causes of Actions Pending in any other Courts or Tribunals in these Consolidated Cases (under Rule 135, Sec. 5, Inherent Powers of Courts), to Prevent Mockery of Justice, Judicial Sabotage and Multiplicty of Suits.

Downfall of the 14th President of the Republic of the Philippines

On the feast of the Black Nazarene, at exactly 6:00 a.m., January 9, 1999, Judge Floro was bestowed his first vision (of 38) of the a) and b) global millennium massive earthquakes & several world apparitions of the Blessed Virgin Mary and the physical hurting of VP Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

This vision was written and repeatedly published as Prophecy to the High Tribunal per Court Pleadings on April 13, 2001, July 20, 2003, 2004 & 2005, in HK Standard newspaper on September 2, 2006 and in the Ombudsman Curse dated 3 June, 2011.

36

Page 37: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

"Hindi totoong napakasama ni Gloria. Tanong ko lang: a) bakit si Marcos, gumagapang na sa hirap ng sakit na Lupus, hindi pa pinayagang umuwi ni Corazon mula sa Hawaii? b) bakit si Cory naghirap sa colon cancer, gaya ni VP Doy na halos maglulupasay sa sahig sanhi ng walang lunas na karamdaman? c) bakit si FVR, ganun din ang sinapit ng kaniyang anak, damay pa ang kapatid nitong binangga ng elf at 3 beses inoperahan? d) bakit nakulong ng 69.1 buwan si Erap vis-a-vis 68.1 buwang Benipayo suspension ni Judge Floro na tinanggal ni Minita noong ika-7 ng Abril, 2006? e) bakit bumagsak si Arroyo kasabay at eksakto sa kaniyang "physical hurting" noong ika-58th na kaarawan ni Judge Floro ayon a Prediksyon ng 3 duende? Bakit 11 tragedha ang dinanas ng bansa mula ng sinumpa ng Anghel ng Kamatayan ang pagkakatalaga kay Carpio-Morales?

Dahil ba napakasama nilang lahat? Dahil ba napakabulok ng mga buto nila? Dahil ba sukdulan ang mga kasalanan ng kanilang mga magulang at mga anak?

Hindi, kundi, naganap ang mga itinakda ni LUIS, ayon sa Ultimate Violet and Pink Lights ni Judge Floro upang

37

Page 38: G.R. No. 199034 PGMA Intervention

matanggap, mamasdan at malaman ng buong mundo, na sa buong kalawakan, ang pangalan ni Judge Floro ay: "Pinagpala, Powerful", Element 115, Angel of Death, Prophet, Visionary ...

Mula ng ginawa sa Genesis ang sangkalibutan, si Judge Floro lang ang may mga mata at mga palad, na kahit anong oras, ay maaaring makita ng kahit sino mang tao, ang mga mistikong liwanag, ang langit, kalawakan, pati si na si Kristo at Maria ..." - Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr.

38