Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Recommendations from The Final Report.

23
Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Recommendations from The Final Report

Transcript of Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Recommendations from The Final Report.

Governor’sAction Group for Safe Children

Recommendations from

The Final Report

Action Group ChargeAction Group Charge

For children who cannot remain safely at home, the Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children will develop:

a full and seamless continuum of placements, services, and support that are

safe, appropriate, community-based, and community supported.

Focus of 3 Work GroupsFocus of 3 Work Groups

1. First placement is the right placement

2. Seamless system of placement options

3. Statewide access to safe and appropriate placements

Work Group # 1:First Placement Is the Right PlacementWork Group # 1:First Placement Is the Right Placement

Inventory existing assessment instruments and methodologies.

Recommend a comprehensive assessment methodology for all children who cannot remain at home

Apply assessment findings to future placement decisions

Work Group # 2:Statewide Access to Safe &Appropriate Placements

Work Group # 2:Statewide Access to Safe &Appropriate Placements

Inventory existing placement options Use existing data and best practice to

define gaps in continuum of placements Consider existing child profile data to

prioritize highest system need for placement options

Work Group # 3:Seamless Systemof Placement Options

Work Group # 3:Seamless Systemof Placement Options

Develop strategies to recruit, train and retain providers along the continuum

Develop community partnerships to create more placement options

Create a system of data and information sharing among agencies, providers, advocacy groups and courts

Develop innovative financing

Selected Recommendations from the Final Report

Vision

The Action Group’s vision of the child’s involvement with the State includes compassion, collaboration, cooperation, common sense and communication to demonstrate that children are cherished.

Vision

While we recognize that children suffer pain and tragedy daily that burdens the hearts of all Georgians, we seek to design a system to provide appropriate, adequate care of children; to encourage retention, dedication and professionalism of those who serve our children; and to galvanize citizen action and support for the success of all children and families in Georgia.

Final Report Issue Areas (11)

1) Staff & Work Force

2) Assessment & Screening

3) Family-Based Placements

4) Non-Family-Based Placements

5) Support Services

6) Coordinated Case Management

Final Report Issue Areas

7) Cross-Agency Collaboration, Organizational Structure & Evaluation

8) Data Systems & Information Sharing

9) Community Collaboration

10)Legal Issues

11) Innovative Financing

Staff & Work Force

Reduce caseloads Knowledgeable case managers Culturally competent case managers Incentives to attract right staff

Assessment & Screening

Shared assessments Common assessment components Time frames for data collection Required acceptance of

assessments across agencies Cross-training First staff is right staff Early assessments to prevent out-of-

home placements

Family-Based Placements

Increase availability of foster care Single system for foster care

recruitment, training, retention Privatization of recruitment Statewide marketing campaign Positive agency response & support

Non- Family-Based Placements

Increase availability of therapeutic services, independent living, emergency placements

Monitor implementation of Level of Care system

Consistent licensing rules for public & private foster homes

Support services

Make educational services a priority Active participation of local schools Develop comprehensive system of

mental health services for children

Case Management

Implement new case management system: accessible, accountable, measurable outcomes, best practices

Community- or school-based case management

Agencies held responsible: Stop the competition not to serve

Cross-Agency Collaboration

Explore organizational structures focused on children’s issues; e.g., program budgeting, children’s cabinet

Joint planning among child-serving agencies

Involve Dept of Education Evaluate effectiveness of programs

Data Systems &Information Sharing

Effective data systems Availability of needed information Shared access Statutory authority to share information HIPAA compliance SACWIS project accountability Continue Juvenile Tracking System efforts

Community Collaboration

Investigate national models of collaboration

Develop faith-based strategy Bottom-up/Top-down communication Add out-of-home placement benchmark to

Family Connection indicator set

Legal

Standard definition of “child” Competent legal representation for

children in court CHINS, PINS, & FINS Children’s right to MH services

Innovative Financing

Level of Care system Funding follows the child Maximize federal funding Outcomes & accountability

Governor’sAction Group for Safe Children

Recommendations from

The Final Report