Government Regulation Antitrust Policy and Regulation Chapter 28.
-
Upload
everett-matthews -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of Government Regulation Antitrust Policy and Regulation Chapter 28.
Government Regulation
Antitrust Policy and Regulation
Chapter 28
What are Antitrust Laws?
Antitrust policy can also be called antimonopoly policy….
HISTORY IN BRIEF FOR ANTITRUST LAWS
U.S. civil War (1861-1865)… after this period markets expanded which led to some firms becoming dominant.
Among these, petroleum, meatpacking, sugar, railroads, whiskey, tobacco.
These dominant firms whether oligopolists or monopolists became known as trusts (or business combinations that assign control to a single decision group)… I.e. trustees.
Hence, word trust became synonymous with monopoly (as it is used today)
These dominant firms used questionable tactics in conducting business… and in consolidating and keeping market share… They charged higher prices… and pressured resource suppliers to provide resources as lower prices. (sort of an Al Capone style)
Conclusions of the 1800’sThese dominant firms did not do anything to
protect the consumer.
There was no fair competition or in some cases, complete barrier to entry existed.
Government steps in:
Set up through legislation (Sherman being the first) alternative methods of control:
Regulatory agencies – Interstate Commerce Commission was first - 1887 directed to protect against railroad abuse
Antitrust laws.
Antitrust
Antitrust Law Legislation passed for the stated purpose of
controlling monopoly power and preserving and promoting competition.
A monopoly: Produces a smaller output than is produced by a
perfectly competitive firm with the same revenue and cost considerations,
Charges a higher price, and Causes a deadweight loss.
Antitrust Acts
Sherman Act (1890) Clayton Act (1914) Federal trade Commission Act (1914) Robinson – Patman Act (1936) Wheeler – Lea Act (1938) Celler – Kefauver Anti-merger Act (1950)
Sherman Act of 1890
Outlawed:
“Restraints of Trade”
Collusive price fixing
Dividing up the market
Very ineffective legislation… nothing much changed…. Dominant firms kept right on dominating….
Did bring suit again Standard Oil Ohio – controlled 80% of nation’s oil-refining.
Clayton Act of 1914
Legislation to cure the ills of the Sherman foibles.
Set up the FTC as the watchdog for:
Price discrimination eliminated.
Tying contracts (producer requires buyer to purchase another of its products as condition for obtaining the desired product.
Acquisition of stocks of competing corporations that would lesson competition
Interlocking directorates (director of one firm on board of competing firm)
Federal Trade Commission
Robinson-Patman Act 1936- amended the Clayton and buying power of chain stores. Referred to as “Chain Store Act.”
Wheeler-Lea Act 1938 – amended FTC Act on protecting consumers against false advertising.
Celler-Kefauver Act 1950- amended Clayton to include regulation of vertical and conglomerate mergers.Difference between vertical/horizontal/conglomerate mergers
Exemptions from Antitrust Laws
Labor unions Public utilities Professional baseball Cooperative activities of U.S. Exporters Hospitals Insurance companies Publit transit and water systems Supplies of military equipment Joint publishing in single town – 2 or more
newspapers.
Price Fixing – an obvious deterrent to competition.
This brings government in to shut down very quickly. Many instances of price fixing through the years in U.S. But is illegal.
Rigging bids for government contracts..such as dividing up the market (without competitive bid) known as per se violations in antitrust law.
Price Discrimination
Common practice that rarely elicits the ire of government…
Why? Green fees and tee times!
Doesn’t really deter competition.
Unless the discriminated prices are used to obstruct entry or drive out competition.
Today who watches
FTC (5 member commission appointed by Pres/confirmed by Senate)
Along with the U.S. Justice Department… the enforcer for antitrust laws.
(note the separation of powers in force here….
Which branch makes the law?
Which branch enforces the law?
Which branch interprets the law
Legal Framework for FTC
Quasi-legislative
Quasi-judicial
Can issue cease and desist orders
Can do ALL of this on its own initiative
What is the Wheeler-Lea Act of 1938…?
It allowed more latitude for FTC… additional policing of businesses… now FTC responsible for “deceptive acts or practices in commerce.”
Until this amendment was passed, the FTC could only restrict practices that were unfair to competitors.
Robinson-Patman ActAmendment to Clayton 1936Large volume buyers who might use their buying power to extract
special deals, including quantity discounts, free promotional materials or purchase allowances, were targeted by the Robinson-Patman Act. The Robinson-Patman Act imposes limits on these practices
without prohibiting them entirely. The act is enforced by the Federal Trade Commission in
conjunction with the Department of Justice.
White House Power
Independent Regulatory Commissions All Regulatory Agencies fall under Executive
branch of government
Political Appointments of Chairmen or Boards Affects Judicial Interpretation
Power of Commissions…. In political spectrum
When in Court… get diverse judgments on monopoly power, mergers, anti-trust.
Where should focus be? On monopoly behavior (or) Monopoly structure
What is the verdict?
Structure or Behavior. If Justice Dept and/or courts think the corporation or
company is acting in anticompetitive way, will be a violation of Sherman.
Alcoa was acting like monopoly (hence had to break-up)
If not… and is doing good for society ( IBM, Intel) then it is “behaving” OK… and is permitted.
But if considered a “bad monopoly” like Microsoft…. Then the boom is lowered by government.
Why don’t companies sue each other?
They do! But it is very expensive and lengthy process.
Take the case to government… let government bring the case… then after verdict…if favorable… will sue for treble damages.
State most Fortune 500 companies are domiciled?
Why does government have such a waffling track record?
Simple……………….
It’s political!
Two theories:
1) Active antitrust perspective (not the right mix of outputs… not enough competition… govt needs to correct).
2) Laissez faire perspective (markets will battle each other develop innovative ways of producing more efficiently).
Rule of Reason by government
Govt usually lenient if monopoly developed naturally…
Govt will sue usually if a very high market share and abusive power used by it.
Two big cases in which govt stepped in and altered the structure.
AT&T and Microsoft. In 1982 AT&T settled out of court… Ma Bell would divest itself of 22 baby bells…(now look what 2007 has brought)
Microsoft Case:
Govt accused Microsoft of maintaining monopoly of operating systems for PCs
Two courts issued a “break-up” order… but later rescinded and allowed a behavioral remedy.(in the interim… Microsoft was fined a million $$ a day for over two years).
3 Things To Remember about Regulation 1. More regulations less freedom
2. More regulations higher cost to consumer
3. Regulations would NOT be needed if business policed itself.
Regulatory QuizRegulatory Quiz
Who regulates advertising on TV?
Who controls money in circulation?
Who regulates your bank deposit guarantees?
Who regulates mail-orders?
• Who regulates baby pacifier recall?
• Who regulates securities?
• Who regulates health foods?
• Who regulates water we drink?
• Who regulates pet food?
What is regulation? Rules set by government or their agencies that seek
to control the operation of firms that may have monopoly power in their own industry.
Regulation is meant to deal with the problems of market failure – where markets fail to reach an optimal allocation of resources.
Monopoly power may lead to consumers being exploited. (i.e. prices charge above the true marginal cost of supply)
In terms of regulation of the market, the government attempts to prevent operations in the market that are against the public interest. (i.e. anti-competitive practices)
Where does government get the power to regulate?
ARTICLE I, SECTION 8 CLAUSE 3.
“To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.”
When is Government Regulation needed?
Under the right conditions… competitive, free markets succeed (meaning the efficient allocation of economic resources)
For competitive, free markets to success- must have 3 things:
1) Everyone have full knowledge2) Economic activities must never enjoy or
suffer externalities3) High initial/low incremental cost
production never occur… NEVER WILL HAPPEN!
Of course, these conditions fail!We do not know everythingCars and other goods release exhaustsSteel and flour mills,oil refineries, railroads…all
have high initial and low incremental costs.
***Government can permit a market to allocate goods when people know of risks, private and social benefits are the same, and no industries exist with decreasing costs.
So……………the question continues…How much government involvement do we want in our society, our economy, our lives????????
How do we keep a balance?
What drives the balance?
But………….. As you have learned……..
Governments also fail!
*People in government act to promote their interests or interests of their associates
*Businesses often use government as a shield for to help build regulation as a shield from their competitors.
Criteria to determine if Regulatory Agency Has decision-making authority Establishes standards or guidelines Operates principally in domestic activity Head of agency appointed by
Pres/confirmed by Senate
America was first an agrarian economy.
Moved to Industrial- brought regulation with it.
ICC was first federal regulatory agency passed in 1887 (intended to handle all regulation) (note before the Sherman)(existed until 1996.. Now just a department)
In 1913 Congress created series of new agencies in ICC mold (Fed Reserve 1913)
FTC (1914)
Continued
Most of traditional agencies appeared during New Deal era
Early 1970’s saw new surge of regulation. Regulation was intended to be apolitical Regulation was to set policy after opinions
were discussed on pros/cons Regulation would provide uniformity to
government policy
Why are IRC’s Created?
Basic purpose- correct for market failure Establish stability for the economy Destructive competition Consumers incapable of making decisions External diseconomies Social regulation (used to achieve broad-
based social policy objectives)
Reasons for Regulation America is mixed-economy-explain All industries are regulated (taxi cabs – nuclear plants)
Anytime “public interest” is in question, demands “public oversight”
What is a recent plea for more Regulation? What agency might be given more control?
Legal authority- where found?
Two categories of Federal Regulation
Traditional – regulation that usually is aimed at specific industries and pursues economic objectives (this is the one the book would refer to as Industrial Regulatory Commission)
Fed Reserve FTC SEC FCC
New – usually cuts across industry lines and pursues non-economic objectives (these are the ones the book refers to as Social Regulatory Commissions)
CPSC-1972 OSHA-1971 EPA – 1971 EEOC- 1964
Federal Trade CommissionFTC Created 1914, is an IRC Promotes free and fair competition in interstate
commerce through prevention of trade restraints (price-fixing, illegal combinations of competitors, unfair practices)
Sherman – 1890, Clayton 1914 Protects public- false/deceptive advertising Prevents practices that lead to monopoly Prevents price discrimination
LOOK WHO I FOUND!!!
FTC Continued
Requires accurate labels on fur and textile products
Supervises operators of export business Regulates mail-order firms Requires lending institutions (retailers,
finance companies, etc) to give accurate and complete information about cost of credit
Cease and Desist Order on Saturday mornings
For Release: March 7, 2003 FTC Charges Bristol-Myers Squibb with Pattern of
Abusing Government Processes to Stifle Generic Drug Competition
Alleged Illegal Conduct Involves Three Drugs; Includes Improper "Orange Book" Listings and Unlawful Agreements in Restraint of Trade
http://www.fda.gov/cder/ob/
"This case, and others we have brought and will bring," stated Timothy J. Muris, Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, "stands for an important proposition: competition must be on the merits, not through misusing the government to stifle your competition."
March 20, 2006DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) -- Shares of Maytag and
Whirlpool have fallen amid speculation that the Justice Department is going to challenge their proposed merger.
Michigan-based Whirlpool is offering $1.79 billion for rival Maytag.
The Justice Department's anti-trust division has sought more time to review the deal and the companies have agreed not to close before March 30th. There could be a decision this week.
WASHINGTON, March 20 (Reuters) - U.S. antitrust authorities on Monday said they had approved the proposed buyout of retailer Sports Authority Inc. (TSA.N: Quote, Profile, Research) by an affiliate of private equity firm Leonard Green & Partners.
Federal Communications Commission – FCC
http://www.ftc.gov/ IRC – 1934 Responsible for regulating all interstate and
foreign communications (radio, television, wire, cable and satellite.
Allocates bands of frequencies Licenses and regulates station operators Regulates common carriers- telephone,
telegraph, satellite
FCC Continued
FCC does not regulate broadcast networks or programming of individual stations
FCC has no authority over any form of government communication
FCC has no authority over communication media (movies, newspapers, books)
http://www.fcc.gov/
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation - FDIC IRC-1933 Insures funds of bank depositors up to
$100,000 (until 12/31 - will be $250,000) Regulator of banks that hold state charters
and not members of Federal Reserve Examines banks periodically Approves bank mergers Requires adequate security system
Food and Drug AdministrationFDA
Not an IRC- Agency within Health and Human Services Dept – 1953
Tests products for approval Evaluates and approves claims for new drugs Develops policy for labeling of all drugs Develops standards for otc drugs Sets standards for safe use of color and food
additives. Develops standards for veterinary drugs Conducts research on effects of radiation exposure
National Labor Relations BoardNLRB IRC – 1935 Conducts elections to determine if workers in plant,
factory wish to join a union Conducts elections to determine which of two unions
preferred Serves as arbitrator in labor dispute Acts to prevent employers and unions from engaging
in unfair and illegal union organization activities and unfair labor practices
Labor Law
Taft-Hartley Act 1947 (restored balance between labor and business by prohibiting unfair practices by labor)
Passed over Truman’s veto Some of unfair practices forbid were “closed
shop, feather bedding, high initiation fees, wildcat striking
Security Exchange CommissionSEC IRC – 1934 Purpose to protect investors and public from
disorderly and unscrupulous operations of securities and financial markets
Has to receive detailed annual financial report from corporations listed on stock exchanges.
Any stock made public must provide financial condition and prospectus
Additional power through Sarbanes-Oxley (2006) after WC, Enron, Global Crossing, Arthur Anderson
Let’s Look at Social Regulation a minute!
As we said… social cuts “across the board.” Social gets in our face on a daily basis.
(traditional focuses on rates, cost, profits, competitiveness…. Social focuses on product design, safety for consumer, employment conditions, health)
Major social players were created between ’70s and ’80s… additional responsibilities have been added up to 2006.
Why the sudden push for “social” Regs?
Because………. Standard of living was continually increasing for majority of Americans… now time to assess “quality of living.”
Hence, the EEOC was given the assignment to enforce the Americans with Disability Act of 1990.
Now… think back can this be assessed with MC/MB formula?
So………….the regulation emerged to improve the non-material quality of life.
Cleaner Air
Safer Products
Safer Workplace
Less Pollution
Cleaner Water
Great equality of opportunity
Consumer Product Safety Commission(CPSC)
http://www.cpsc.gov/ IRC- 1970’s Protects consumers against product
malfunctions, and dangers Recalls millions of dollars yearly of products
produced that are dangerous Halogen lamps (40 million were recalled) in
1998 because they were a fire hazard
Environmental Protection Agency - EPA Independent Agency- 1970 Establishes national air quality Air pollution limits set Establishes emission standards Supervises clean air plans Issues permits for discharge of pollutants into
navigable waters
EPA Continued Sets national drinking water standards Regulates sludge, low-level radioactivity
materials Maintains inventory of existing hazardous
waste dumps Coordinates clean-up of oil spills Requires registration of insecticides,
herbicides, pesticides
Occupational Safety and Health Administration - OSHA Agency under Labor Department – 1970 Encourages employers and employees to
reduce hazards in workplace Keeps records of job-related injuries,
illnesses and deaths Enforces mandatory job safety and health
standards
Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Regulation really worth the cost?
*social/economiccost for Coal-firing plant to put on scrubbers?cost for Dow Chemical to stop polluting?
What are the benefits?what is the benefit to see across the Grand Canyon
what is the benefit to having safe drinking water?what is the benefit for having consumer products that do not cause fires when used?
Or products that do not cause death or blindness from imported Chinese products?
There is No Free Lunch
But………..can we continue to enjoy a higher standard of living if our environment is trashed?
examples: Mercury in lakes now
Eastern Germany…now
Pollutants in ozone… now
Do benefits outweigh the costs? Are their hidden costs, direct costs, and are benefits
tangible or intangible? Do “regulators” want to enact their own political
agenda? (legislate morals?) Do the costs pull the standard of living down because
businesses cannot afford to comply? Can they be costly in unintended effect? (gas
mileage increased… car safety decreased) Price-fixing for oil companies? (bad unintended
effect?) Who should oversee the cost?
(executive/legislative)?
A word about De-regulation
Have you flown recently?
Have you shipped anything UPS?
Do you have DISH Network?
How does Colorado regulate Marijuana?
http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/28/us/10-things-colorado-recreational-marijuana/
Consensus among economists(that has to be an oxymoron)
De-regulation has benefited consumers and the economy
Lower-prices More competition Innovation More jobs created
Wrap-Up Regulation
Regulatory Commissions- control industries by public regulation.
Was originally assumed the agencies would be free from political influence..
apolitical… Instead, politicians have
used agencies to further their careers.
68 Regulatory Agencies - ?? Government budget of
1998 said $17.2 billion spend on regulation
In year 2001 = $19.8 billion
In year 2006 = $41.4 (up from $39.5 in 2005)
2011 – http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/07/red-tape-rising-a-2011-mid-year-report
Federal Regulation affects nearly every facet of our daily lives
Regulation is costly and causes massive paperwork.
Federal Register- publishes ALL proposed and final regulations.