GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD...

136
GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF CENTRAL AND STATE SAMPLE DATA 66 th ROUND OF NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Planning Department, Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai

Transcript of GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD...

Page 1: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA

REPORT ON POOLING OF CENTRAL AND STATE SAMPLE DATA

66th ROUND OF NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010)

HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT

Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Planning Department, Government of Maharashtra,

Mumbai

Page 2: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

PREFACE

The Directorate of Economics and Statistics has prepared a report on ‘Household Consumer Expenditure’ and ‘Employment & Unemployment’ based on the data of state, central & pooled (central & state) samples collected in the 66th round (July, 2009 – June, 2010) of National Sample Survey. 2. The report contains important findings of the survey in ‘Executive Summary’ while detailed results are given in ‘Survey Findings’. 3. I hope the results of this survey will be useful to senior officers of the Government involved in policy framing, researchers, economists and academicians. Mumbai Director of Economics and Statistics, September, 2015 Planning Department, Government of Maharashtra

Page 3: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

CONTENTS Page CHAPTER-1 Executive Summary 1

CHAPTER-2 Introduction and Background 2

CHAPTER-3 Summary Findings 6

CHAPTER-4 Testing poolability and Methodology for pooling 14

CHAPTER-5 Poolability Test Results 19

Table 5.1(R) & 5.1(U): District wise results of test of MPCE (URP, MRP,

MMRP) for Pooled sample - Run test 19

Table 5.2 (R) & 5.2 (U): District wise test results of persons over worker,

unemployed and out of labour force for PS+SS, CWS and CDS status of

Pooled sample - Chi-square test 21

CHAPTER-6 Pooled Results of schedule 1.0 and 10 and their RSE 23

Table 6.1 (R) & 6.1 (U): District wise estimated number of households and their RSE's for central, state and pooled samples - Type-1 23

Table 6.2 (R) & 6.2 (U): District wise estimated number of persons and their RSE's for Central, State and Pooled sample - Type-1 27 Table 6.3 District wise estimated household size for central, state and pooled sample 29

Table 6.4 (R) & 6.4 (U): District wise estimated sex ratio and their RSE's for Central, State and Pooled sample - Type-1 30

Table 6.5 (R) & 6.5 (U): District wise estimate of MPC (URP) and their RSE's for Central, State and Pooled sample 32

Table 6.6 (R) & 6.6 (U): District wise estimate of MPCE (MRP) and their RSE's for Central, State and Pooled sample 40 Table 6.7 (R) & 6.7 (U): District wise estimated number of households

and their RSE's for central, state and pooled samples - Type-2 48

Table 6.8 (R) & 6.8 (U): District wise estimated number of persons and their RSE's for Central, State and Pooled sample - Type-2 50

Table 6.9 (R) & 6.9 (U): District wise estimated sex ratio and their RSE's for Central, State and Pooled sample - Type-2 52

Table 6.10 (R) & 6.10 (U): District wise estimate of MPCE (MMRP) and their RSE's for Central, State and Pooled sample 54

Table 6.11(R) & 6.11 (U): District wise WPR per 1000(PS+SS) for central, state and pooled samples 62

Page 4: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

Table 6.12 (R) & 6.12 (U): District wise LFPR per 1000 for central, state and pooled samples 66

Table 6.13 (R) & 6.13 (U): District wise RSE of estimated WPR per 1000(PS+SS) for central, state and pooled samples 68

Table 6.14 (R) & 6.14 (U): District wise RSE of LFPR for central, state and pooled samples 72

DETAILED TABLES Table (21): Per thousand distribution of persons by usual activity 76

category taking also into consideration the subsidiary economic status of persons categorized 'not working' in the principal status (for pooled samples) Table (34): Per thousand distribution of persons by Current Weekly Activity (for pooled samples) 94

Table (36): Per thousand distribution of persons-Days by Current Daily Activity (for pooled samples) 112

Annexure -1: Sample size for 66th round of each district in the state 130 Annexure -2: Abbreviations used in this Report 131 Annexure -3: Description of Activity status code 132

Page 5: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

1

Chapter – 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Findings 1. The average household size at the state level for the rural and urban areas based on the state and central sample are consistent with each other. This in turn gives similar estimate at the state level on the basis of pooled data. The district wise pooled estimates indicate that in rural areas Hingoli, Parbhani, Nashik, Bid have the largest (5.2 each) average household size while Ratnagiri, Raigad have the smallest (3.8) average household size. In urban areas Ratnagiri has smallest (3.5) and Bid, Parbhani have highest (5.7 each) average household size. (Refer table 6.3)

2. As per pooled data, in rural areas Raigad has the highest Monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) and Nandurbar has lowest MPCE, while in urban areas Mumbai has highest and Washim has lowest MPCE. 3. As per the State sample data, out of the 33 districts, for rural areas, 17 districts have their MPCE below the State average while as per the central sample data this count is 15 districts. 4. For urban areas, all the districts, except four districts viz. Thane, Mumbai, Raigad and Ratnagiri, have their MPCE below the State average as per the State sample data. However, the central sample data shows that except four districts viz. Thane, Mumbai, Raigad and Pune, all other districts have less MPCE compared to the State average. 5. District wise pooled data of sex ratio shows that, in rural area, Chandrapur has highest and Jalgaon has lowest sex ratio while for urban area, Sangli has highest and Latur has lowest sex ratio. 6. As per State sample data, in rural areas, 18 districts and in urban areas 10 districts have the labour participation Rate (LFPR) above state average. While as per central sample data this count is 16 and 8 for rural and urban areas respectively. 7. LFPR for rural areas is comparatively higher than urban areas for both central and state sample. 8. Relative standard error (RSE) for LFPR (ps+ss, cws, cds) is below 1% for rural area. Limitations of the data After pooling of the two samples, the districts Sindhudurg, Hingoli, Parbhani, Akola, Washim, Wardha, Bhandara and Gadchiroli are found to have less number of First Stage Units i.e. FSUs (only 16 villages) in the rural areas while Ratnagiri, Sindhudurg, Nandurbar, Hingoli, Osmanabad, Washim, Bhandara, Gondiya and Gadchiroli districts have less number of FSUs (less than 20 UFS blocks) in the urban areas. These are limiting factors for estimation of district level estimates.

Page 6: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

2

Chapter – 2

Introduction and Background

Background The National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) conducts nationwide household consumer expenditure surveys at regular intervals as part of its “rounds”, each round normally of a year’s duration. The NSS surveys are conducted through interviews of a random sample of households selected through a scientific design and cover practically the entire geographical area of the country. The household consumer expenditure survey (CES) is generally covered as one of the main subjects of the NSS survey at quinquennial intervals. This provides a series of CES’s. The 66th round survey (July 2009 - June 2010) was the eighth such survey of this quinquennial series, the seventh having been conducted during the 61st round (July 2004 - June 2005). State’s participation in NSS surveys Maharashtra state has been participating in the NSS surveys from 9th round onwards by using the same concepts, definitions and procedures and by adopting the same sample design based on independently drawn sample as that of NSSO called as the State samples. The sample size of the State sample in Maharashtra for rural area is equal to that of Central sample and for urban sample it is one and half times of the Central sample. The sample list of the State sample is drawn and supplied by the NSSO. District wise sample size of 66th round is given in Annexure-1. One of the objectives of states participation in the NSS programme is to provide a mechanism by which sample size will be increased and the pooling of the two sets of data would enable better estimates at lower sub state level, particularly at district level. At the State level, this will result in increased precision of the estimates and at disaggregated level, estimates will be more stable. But the major benefit will be derived in the case of estimates are generated at sub-state level like NSS regions/districts. Emerging need for pooling of Central and State samples The 73rd and 74th constitutional amendment (1992) has brought into existence the democratically elected grassroots institutions of local self governance, with respective delegated functions, both in rural and urban areas. This has enhanced the demand for local level statistics and necessitated requirement of developing basic capabilities at grass root levels to organize such statistics in a harmonious manner. In this context, it is envisioned that the survey resources in overall NSS programme both by Central and State Agencies can be more effectively utilized to generate lower level estimates of key indicators at district level. 13th Finance Commission, in Para 12.99 of its report, noted that “Comparable estimates of district income are extremely relevant for measuring intra-state income disparities. This will enable State Governments to effectively plan policy and programme interventions. They could also be used as a parameter for horizontal distribution of fiscal transfers”. The Commission also recommended for granting finance to State Governments, which

Page 7: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

3

should be utilized by them for strengthening statistical infrastructure at the district level. These requirements are subsequently brought in institutional framework in the implementation of the 13th Finance Commission. National Statistical Commission’s (NSC) Recommendation The National Statistical Commission in its reports has observed the importance of pooling in the statement:

“The statistical agencies of different State governments have been participating in the NSS programme and canvassing the same questionnaires in matched samples of households in their respective States following identical concepts, definitions and procedures. Results from the central samples and state sample(s) have occasionally been compared. The main purpose of the programme is to pool the two samples and obtain dependable estimates for regions within the States.”

National Statistical Commission (NSC) constituted the committee on pooling of Central and State samples in National Sample Surveys (NSS) etc under the chairmanship of Prof. R. Radhakrishna vide order no. 8(64)/2010-NSC, 30th July, 2010. The terms of reference of the committee are as follows:- • Conditions to be fulfilled for pooling of Central and State Sample NSS data • Methodology for pooling • Time frame by which the exercise needs to be completed by each State • Generating weighting diagrams from the pooled data at sub-state level for the purpose of

consumer price indices (Rural and Urban) including occupation specific indices such as CPIAL, CPIIW etc., from the NSS data on consumer expenditure surveys (quinquennial & thin sample)

Assistance of NSSO (DPD) for processing of NSS State Sample Data Since NSSO develops its own in-house software for processing the Central sample data, in the deliberations of COCSSO held in the recent past, it was recommended that NSSO should assist the States in terms of providing common Data Entry Software, Tabulation Software, Instructions Manual and Training and Hands on Practice to DES personnel. NSSO has already started providing this assistance to States. The harmonization of data processing process is one of the key essences for pooling the different sets of data. The state sample data should be processed using the same set of validation rules as in the case of Central sample data. Accordingly, it is essential that the State sample data is processed, ensuring the use of same data entry layout as in the case of Central sample. If the States are evolving their own data layout, as per their convenience, then the state data should be put in the layout, harmonized of that with the Central data for using the same software developed for Central samples.

Page 8: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

4

For Maharashtra state the data entry software, validation software and tabulation software are developed by Directorate of Economics and Statistics using Oracle, Java and SAS software. For pooling purpose, state data is put in same layouts as that of Central data. Parameters considered for pooling: Considering the smaller sample size at district level following broad parameters were considered for pooling. a)MPCE of FOOD, Non-FOOD, and Total MPCE derived from detail item for URP, MRP and MMRP b) Household size, sex c) Activity status principal, subsidiary, weekly, daily and their intensity Methodology of pooling: Two alternate methods are used in pooling the Central and State sample data. a) Weighting by Matching ratio: Building aggregate estimate of pooled sample in proportion

matching ratio m:n of Central and State sample aggregate estimate where m and n are the allotted sample for Central and State sample separately for rural and urban sector. Building ratio estimate of pooled sample as ratio of aggregate estimates.

b) Weighting by inverse of variance: Ratio estimates are built by weighting the ratio estimate of

Central and State sample in proportion to inverse of variance of ratio of the Central and State sample.

Tables generated 1. Following Tables were generated for testing the poolability of State and Central samples;

a) District wise results of run test of MPCE (URP, MRP, MMRP) for pooled sample of rural and urban sectors.

b) District wise results of chi-square test of persons over worker, unemployed and out of labour force for pooled sample of rural and urban sectors.

2. Following Tables were generated pertaining to the estimation of different parameters and

their RSEs;

a) District wise estimated number of households and their RSEs for Central, State and pooled samples (Matching ratio & Inverse variance methods) for rural and urban sectors for schedule type-I and schedule type-II

b) District wise estimated number of persons and their RSEs for Central, State and pooled samples (Matching ratio & Inverse variance methods) for rural and urban sectors for schedule type-I and schedule type-II

c) District wise estimated sex ratio and their RSEs for Central, State and pooled samples (Matching ratio & Inverse variance methods) for rural and urban sectors for schedule type-I and schedule type-II

Page 9: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

5

d) District wise estimate of MPCE (URP, MRP, and MMRP) for food, non-food and total for Central, State and pooled samples (Matching ratio & Inverse variance methods) for rural and urban sectors.

e) District wise RSE of estimate of MPCE (URP, MRP, and MMRP) for food, non-food and total for Central, State and pooled samples (Matching ratio & Inverse variance methods) for rural and urban sectors.

f) District wise WPR per 1000(PS+SS) of male, female and total persons for central, state and pooled samples (Matching ratio & Inverse variance methods) for rural and urban sectors.

g) District wise RSE of WPR per 1000(PS+SS) of male, female and total persons for central, state and pooled samples (Matching ratio & Inverse variance methods) for rural and urban sectors.

h) District wise LFPR per 1000(PS+SS, CWS, CDS) for Central, state and pooled samples (Matching ratio & Inverse variance methods) for rural and urban sectors.

i) District wise RSE of LFPR per 1000(PS+SS, CWS, CDS) for central, state and pooled samples (Matching ratio & Inverse variance methods) for rural and urban sectors.

Sample Size of Maharashtra

The sample size of Central and State samples for Maharashtra state is given below; RURAL

Schedule Central Sample State Sample

FSU surveyed

Households surveyed

Persons surveyed

FSU surveyed

Households surveyed

Persons surveyed

1.0 Type I & Type II 504 4015 19112 501 4006 19191

10 504 4017 18715 501 4007 18868

URBAN

Schedule Central Sample State Sample

FSU surveyed

Households surveyed

Persons surveyed

FSU surveyed

Households surveyed

Persons surveyed

1.0 Type I & Type II 502 3980 17117 753 6016 26169

10 502 3988 16760 753 6016 25799

Page 10: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

6

Chapter – 3

Summary Findings

Run test (one sided) was done over MPCE (URP, MRP, MMRP) for testing the poolability of Central and State sample data for urban and rural. Number of districts for which poolability was rejected by both the above mentioned tests is given below; Table: 3.1

Number of Districts for which Poolability was rejected over MPCE by run test using Z-statistics (one sided)

Type Sector

Rural Urban

URP 4 3

MRP 3 3

MMRP 6 2

Total Districts 33 34

In the above statement run test at 1% critical error the null hypothesis is rejected for 4, 3 and 6 districts in rural areas for URP, MRP and MMRP respectively and for 3, 3 and 2 districts in case of urban areas respectively. Similarly number of districts for which poolability was rejected over LFPR by Chi-Square test is given below; Table: 3.2

Number of Districts for which Poolability was rejected over LFPR by Chi-Square test

Type Sector

Rural Urban

PS + SS 11 00

CWS 13 01

CDS 15 04

Total Districts 33 34

Page 11: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

7

Divergence between the estimates of Central and State sample: Considering the district as domain of pooling, the divergence is worked out as absolute percentage difference between Central and State sample estimates. The distribution of districts by absolute percentage range of divergence of MPCE (Food, Non-food and total) of Central and State sample in Maharashtra for rural and urban sector and for MPCE (URP, MRP, MMRP) is given in table 3.3 to 3.5 below: Table: 3.3

Distribution of districts by range of percentage divergence of MPCE (URP) of Central and state sample estimates

Item Sector <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts MPCE: Food Group

Rural 7 7 8 4 4 1 2 33

MPCE: Non Food Group 4 1 5 3 6 2 12 33 MPCE: Total 3 6 6 3 5 3 7 33 MPCE: Food Group

Urban 8 7 7 6 2 3 1 34

MPCE: Non Food Group 5 4 4 5 5 2 9 34 MPCE: Total 9 7 3 3 5 3 4 34 Table: 3.4

Distribution of districts by range of percentage divergence of MPCE (MRP) of Central and state sample estimates

Item Sector <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts MPCE: Food Group

Rural 7 7 8 4 4 1 2 33

MPCE: Non Food Group 5 3 6 3 2 8 6 33 MPCE: Total 4 8 4 8 4 2 3 33 MPCE: Food Group

Urban 8 7 7 6 2 3 1 34

MPCE: Non Food Group 6 2 6 4 7 3 6 34 MPCE: Total 4 9 7 4 4 4 2 34 Table: 3.5 Distribution of districts by range of percentage divergence of MPCE (MMRP) of Central and

state sample estimates

Item Sector <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts MPCE: Food Group

Rural 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 33

MPCE: Non Food Group 6 1 5 2 1 5 13 33 MPCE: Total 2 0 3 2 3 2 21 33 MPCE: Food Group

Urban 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 34

MPCE: Non Food Group 6 3 7 2 5 3 8 34 MPCE: Total 0 2 2 2 3 1 24 34

Page 12: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

8

The districts with more than 20 percent divergence in total MPCE (URP) were 15 (45%) out of 33 districts in the rural sector and 12 (35%) out of 34 district in the urban sector. Similarly in total MPCE (MRP) it is 9 (27%) out of 33 districts in the rural sector and 10 (29%) out of 34 district in the urban sector. In case of MPCE (MMRP) it is 26 (79%) in the rural sector and 28 (82%) in the urban sector. The distribution of district by range of RSE of MPCE (URP, MRP, and MMRP) of Central and State sample for rural and urban sector is given in table 3.6 to table 3.11. Table: 3.6

Distribution of districts by range of RSE of MPCE (URP) of central, state and pooled sample of Maharashtra Rural

Item <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts Central Sample

MPCE: Food Group 27 6 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Non Food Group 14 12 4 0 3 0 0 33 MPCE: Total 22 8 2 1 0 0 0 33

State Sample MPCE: Food Group 31 2 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Non Food Group 18 8 5 1 0 1 0 33 MPCE: Total 23 8 1 0 1 0 0 33

Pooled Sample (Matching Ratio) MPCE: Food Group 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Non Food Group 20 9 3 1 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Total 29 3 1 0 0 0 0 33

Pooled Sample (Inverse Variance) MPCE: Food Group 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Non Food Group 28 3 2 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Total 31 2 0 0 0 0 0 33 Table: 3.7

Distribution of districts by range of RSE of MPCE (URP) of central, state and pooled sample of Maharashtra Urban

Item <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts Central Sample

MPCE: Food Group 27 5 1 0 1 0 0 34 MPCE: Non Food Group 8 13 9 1 2 0 1 34 MPCE: Total 15 12 4 2 1 0 0 34

State Sample MPCE: Food Group 30 4 0 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Non Food Group 14 13 7 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Total 24 10 0 0 0 0 0 34

Page 13: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

9

Item <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts Pooled Sample (Matching Ratio)

MPCE: Food Group 32 2 0 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Non Food Group 15 17 1 1 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Total 24 9 1 0 0 0 0 34

Pooled Sample (Inverse Variance) MPCE: Food Group 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Non Food Group 22 10 2 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Total 28 6 0 0 0 0 0 34 Table: 3.8 Distribution of districts by range of RSE of MPCE (MRP) of central, state and pooled sample

of Maharashtra Rural

Item <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts Central Sample

MPCE: Food Group 27 6 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Non Food Group 16 11 6 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Total 25 5 3 0 0 0 0 33

State Sample MPCE: Food Group 31 2 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Non Food Group 23 10 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Total 25 8 0 0 0 0 0 33

Pooled Sample (Matching Ratio) MPCE: Food Group 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Non Food Group 23 10 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Total 29 4 0 0 0 0 0 33

Pooled Sample (Inverse Variance) MPCE: Food Group 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Non Food Group 29 4 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Total 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 33

Page 14: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

10

Table: 3.9 Distribution of districts by range of RSE of MPCE (MRP) of central, state and pooled sample

of Maharashtra Urban

Item <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts Central Sample

MPCE: Food Group 27 5 1 0 1 0 0 34 MPCE: Non Food Group 10 13 4 6 1 0 0 34 MPCE: Total 17 8 7 2 0 0 0 34

State Sample MPCE: Food Group 30 4 0 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Non Food Group 16 12 6 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Total 23 9 2 0 0 0 0 34

Pooled Sample (Matching Ratio) MPCE: Food Group 32 2 0 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Non Food Group 16 16 2 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Total 24 10 0 0 0 0 0 34

Pooled Sample (Inverse Variance) MPCE: Food Group 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Non Food Group 23 10 1 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Total 30 4 0 0 0 0 0 34 Table: 3.10

Distribution of districts by range of RSE of MPCE (MMRP) of central, state and pooled sample of Maharashtra Rural

Item <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts Central Sample

MPCE: Food Group 20 11 1 1 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Non Food Group 20 5 4 4 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Total 19 8 5 1 0 0 0 33

State Sample MPCE: Food Group 28 5 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Non Food Group 17 12 4 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Total 27 6 0 0 0 0 0 33

Pooled Sample (Matching Ratio) MPCE: Food Group 32 1 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Non Food Group 21 12 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Total 27 6 0 0 0 0 0 33

Pooled Sample (Inverse Variance) MPCE: Food Group 32 1 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Non Food Group 28 5 0 0 0 0 0 33 MPCE: Total 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 33

Page 15: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

11

Table: 3.11 Distribution of districts by range of RSE of MPCE (MMRP) of central, state and pooled

sample of Maharashtra Urban

Item <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts Central Sample

MPCE: Food Group 27 6 1 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Non Food Group 9 13 9 3 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Total 15 14 4 1 0 0 0 34

State Sample MPCE: Food Group 23 10 1 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Non Food Group 16 9 6 3 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Total 19 10 5 0 0 0 0 34

Pooled Sample (Matching Ratio) MPCE: Food Group 28 6 0 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Non Food Group 16 14 4 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Total 21 12 1 0 0 0 0 34

Pooled Sample (Inverse Variance) MPCE: Food Group 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Non Food Group 22 11 1 0 0 0 0 34 MPCE: Total 23 11 0 0 0 0 0 34

From the above tables which show the distribution of districts by RSE level, it can be seen that in case of URP the pooled estimates of MPCE on food, non-food and total have RSE less than 15% for all districts except for only one district in both rural and urban sector. Also in case of MRP the pooled estimates of MPCE on food, non-food and total have RSE less than 10% for all districts except for one or two districts in urban sector. In case of MMRP, RSE estimates of pooled sample of MPCE on food, nonfood and total MPCE are below 15% for rural and also urban sector. Considering the district as domain of pooling, the divergence is worked out as absolute percentage difference between central and state sample estimates. The distribution of districts by absolute percentage range of divergence of WPR and LFPR (PS+SS, CWS, CDS) of central and state samples in Maharashtra for rural and urban sector is given in table: 3.12 below:

Page 16: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

12

Table: 3.12 Distribution of districts by range of percentage divergence of WPR and LFPR (PS+SS, CWS

and CDS) of central and state sample estimates

Item <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts Rural

WPR – PS + SS 14 4 6 2 4 2 1 33 LFPR – PS + SS 14 4 7 1 4 2 1 33 LFPR – CWS 18 4 4 1 3 2 1 33 LFPR – CDS 18 6 3 1 1 2 2 33

Urban WPR – PS + SS 17 3 5 3 5 0 1 34 LFPR – PS + SS 17 5 5 3 3 0 1 34 LFPR – CWS 18 6 4 4 1 0 1 34 LFPR – CDS 18 6 4 4 1 0 1 34 It can be seen from the above table that the divergence level of 7 districts are above 20 % in the rural sector, whereas the divergence level of 6 districts are above 20 % for urban sector. The distribution of districts by range of RSE of WPR and LFPR (PS+SS, CWS, CDS) of central and state sample in Maharashtra for rural and urban sector is given in table: 3.13 & 3.14 below: Table: 3.13

Distribution of districts by range of RSE of WPR and LFPR (PS+SS, CWS and CDS) of Central and State sample of Maharashtra (Rural)

Item <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts Central Sample

WPR – PS + SS 28 5 0 0 0 0 0 33 LFPR – PS + SS 28 5 0 0 0 0 0 33 LFPR – CWS 28 5 0 0 0 0 0 33 LFPR – CDS 28 5 0 0 0 0 0 33

State Sample WPR – PS + SS 21 11 1 0 0 0 0 33 LFPR – PS + SS 21 11 1 0 0 0 0 33 LFPR – CWS 21 11 1 0 0 0 0 33 LFPR – CDS 21 11 1 0 0 0 0 33

Pooled Sample (Matching Ratio Method) WPR – PS + SS 20 13 0 0 0 0 0 33 LFPR – PS + SS 32 1 0 0 0 0 0 33 LFPR – CWS 32 1 0 0 0 0 0 33 LFPR – CDS 32 1 0 0 0 0 0 33

Page 17: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

13

Item <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts Pooled Sample (Inverse Variance Method)

WPR – PS + SS 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 LFPR – PS + SS 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 LFPR – CWS 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 LFPR – CDS 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Table: 3.14

Distribution of districts by range of RSE of WPR and LFPR (PS+SS, CWS and CDS) of central and state sample of Maharashtra (Urban)

Item <=5% 5-10%

10-15%

15-20%

20-25%

25-30% >30% Total

Districts Central Sample

WPR – PS + SS 13 11 5 3 1 0 1 34 LFPR – PS + SS 13 11 5 3 1 0 1 34 LFPR – CWS 13 11 5 3 1 0 1 34 LFPR – CDS 13 11 5 3 1 0 1 34

State Sample WPR – PS + SS 16 8 5 3 1 0 1 34 LFPR – PS + SS 16 8 5 3 1 0 1 34 LFPR – CWS 16 8 5 3 1 0 1 34 LFPR – CDS 16 8 5 3 1 0 1 34

Pooled Sample (Matching Ratio Method) WPR – PS + SS 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 LFPR – PS + SS 4 17 4 4 0 2 3 34 LFPR – CWS 4 17 4 4 0 2 3 34 LFPR – CDS 18 11 2 2 1 0 0 34

Pooled Sample (Inverse Variance Method) WPR – PS + SS 25 6 1 2 0 0 0 34 LFPR – PS + SS 25 6 1 2 0 0 0 34 LFPR – CWS 25 6 1 2 0 0 0 34 LFPR – CDS 25 6 1 2 0 0 0 34

RSE of estimates of WPR and LFPR (PS+SS, CWS, CDS) were found to be within 15 % for central, state sample and pooled estimates in rural sector, whereas in urban sector, RSE of all districts was found to within 25% except one or two districts for central and state sample and within 20% except 2-3 districts for pooled sample.

Page 18: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

14

Chapter – 4

Testing poolability and Methodology for pooling 1 Testing poolability of central and state sample 1.1 Though the central sample and state sample are drawn independently following identical sampling design with same concepts, definitions and instructions, the state sample unit level data in some cases are not properly validated. There is also expected agency bias in the two sets of data generated by different agencies. As such they cannot be merged for generating pooled estimate without testing that the samples are realized from identical distribution function. Since the parametric distribution of the sample mean is unknown one may adopt nonparametric tests such Run test, Median test, chi-square test etc to test that the samples are coming from identical distribution function. 1.2 Median test 1.2.1 In statistics, the median test is a special case of Pearson's Chi-square test. It tests the null hypothesis that the medians of the populations from which two samples are drawn, are identical. Observations in each sample are assigned to two groups, one consisting of data whose values are higher than the median value in the two groups combined, and the other consisting of data whose values are at the median or below. A Pearson's Chi-square test is then used to determine whether the observed frequencies in each group differ from expected frequencies derived from a distribution combining the two groups. Let m*

be the median of the pooled sample data. Construct 2 X 2 contingency table as below and use chi-square test to test if State sample and Central sample have identical median.

Sample type Number of sample observation Total <= m* > m*

State Sample N11 N12 N1. Central Sample N21 N22 N2. Total N.1 N.2 N..

Observed frequency of each cell Oij= Nij where i= 1 to 2, j= 1 to 2. Expected frequency of each cell Eij= (Ni. * N.j)/N.. where i= 1 to 2, j= 1 to 2.

Value = ∑ ∑ ( Oij − Eij) 2 / Oij with degrees of freedom = (2-1)*(2-1) = 1 The statistical power of this test may sometimes be improved by using a value other than the median to define the groups say quintile classes– that is, by using a value which divides the groups into more nearly equal groups than the median would.

Page 19: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

15

1.3 Multinomial distribution test or test For discrete data such as status of activity, educational level and categorical variable such as land possessed etc, standard tests of equality of sample proportions of two sets of data based on multinomial distributions, relevant chi-square tests may be used after grouping the attributes/categorical variables into a suitable number of classes so that each class contains adequate number of sample observations. Construct 2 X k contingency table for k classes at the domain where two sets of data are to be pooled as below and use chi-square test if State sample and Central sample have identical distribution.

Sample type Number of sample observation TotalClass - 1 Class - 2 … Class - k-1 Class - k

State Sample N11 N12 … N1k-1 N1k N1. Central Sample N21 N22 … N2k-1 N2k N2. Total N.1 N.2 … N.k-1 N.k N..

Observed frequency of each cell Oij= Nij where i= 1 to 2, j= 1 to k. Expected frequency of each cell Eij= (Ni. * N.j)/N.. where i= 1 to 2, j= 1 to k.

Value = ∑ ∑ ( Oij − Eij)2/Oij with degrees of freedom = (2-1)*(k-1) = k-1

1.4 Wald-Wolfowitz run test 1.4.1 Suppose X and Y are independent random samples with cumulative distribution function (CDF) as Fs(x) and Fc(y). Null Hypothesis to be tested is H0: Fs(x) = Fc(x) for all x against alternative Hypothesis is H1: Fs(x) <= Fc(x) for all x and Fs(x) < Fc(x) for some x. Let x1, x2, ….., xm be iid observation from state sample with distributive function Fs and y1,y2,…..,yn be iid observation from central sample with distributive function Fc. Pool the data and order them with respect to comparable characteristic under consideration say monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE). In the pooled order sequence put “1” for X and “0” for Y. Let U be the total runs observed where 'run' is a sequence of adjacent equal symbols. For example, following sequence: 1111000111001111110000 is divided in six runs, three of them are made out of “1” and the others are made out of “0”. The number of runs U is a random variable whose distribution for large sample can be treated as normal with:

mean : + 1

variance : ( )( ) ( )

Page 20: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

16

After normalizing the variable U one may use one sided z-test for testing the Null hypothesis. In extreme case the value of U will be 2 meaning by observed characteristic of all the observation of one sample is less than the other samples. 1.4.2 One of the limitations of this test is when there is a tie between two samples in the observed value. One has to resolve ties in usual manner. However if there is large number of ties which is bound to occur specially for qualitative attributes like education level, activity status etc, this test is not recommended. This test can be well applied for a continuous variable such as MPCE which are less prone to ties. For discrete variable chi-square test is recommended. 2 Methodology for pooling 2.1 Pooling by inverse weight of the variance of the estimates 2.1.1 Aggregate estimate: For any characteristic, consider the state sample [s] in the form of two independent sub- sample s1 and s2 and the central sample [c] in the form of two independent sub- sample c1 and c2. Based on this, the respective estimates for state and central can be computed as: t s = ∑ (ts1 + ts2)/2 and t c = ∑(tc1 + tc2)/2 Pooled estimate leading to optimum combination of these two estimates is given by weighing with inverse of the variance of the estimate. Thus the pooled estimate is given by: = ( ) ( )( ) ( ) with ( ) = ( ) ( )( ) ( ) In general and ( ) and ( ) are unknown and can be estimated as ( ) = ∑ ( − ) /4 , ( ) = ∑ ( − ) /4 where ∑l stands for summing over stratum x sub-stratum level variance at the domain of pooling. Thus pooled estimate and estimate of pooled variance is given by = ( ) ( )( ) ( ) = ( ) ( )( ) ( ) 2.1.2 By virtue of weighing the two estimates at the domain level at which two estimates are pooled, the pooled estimate will always lie between the central and state sample estimates. 2.1.3 Estimate of rate: Let rc and rs be the estimate of Rc and Rs ie Y/X based on central and state sample respectively with corresponding estimated mean square error mse(rc) and mse(rs). The pooled estimate and estimate of variance of pooled ratio estimate may be given by: = ( ) ( )( ) ( ) , ( ) = ( ) ( )( ) ( )

Page 21: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

17

Where ( ) and ( ) are calculated using estimation procedure of NSS 66th round. Alternatively one can generate the pooled estimate of aggregate by inverse weight of estimate of variance obtained from central and state sample using formula given in para 2.1.1 for the characteristics x as well as y and obtain the pooled estimate of ratio as ratio of pooled estimate of aggregate. This will ensure consistency between pooled estimates of aggregate and the pooled estimate of ratio. 2.1.4 Method laid down in para 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 requires calculation of estimate of variance of the estimates before pooling them. Reliability of estimate of variance should be ascertained with due consideration of sample size. Besides the complex calculations of variances and covariances for each cell of the table, one needs to address the issue of non-additivity of the component estimates with the estimate of marginal total. For e.g. pooled estimate of MPCE of FOOD and NON-FOOD may not add up to MPCE of TOTAL. To obviate this problem one may generate the pooled estimates of components first and then derive the estimate of total as sum of estimates of components. 2.2 Pooling by simple average of the estimates 2.2.1 Many of the States are not fully equipped with complex calculation of estimate of variance especially when cells of the table contains ratio of two characteristics which is usually presented in the NSS reports. When the State’s participation is equal matching of central samples, the simple average of two estimates may be a way of combining the estimates considering central and state samples as independent samples. The pooled estimate will always lie between the estimates based on central and state sample separately. 2.2.2 When the State’s participation is of unequal matching of central samples, the weighted average of two estimates with weights being matching ratio of central and state sample may be a better way of combining the estimates considering central and state samples as independent samples. For any characteristic, consider the state sample [s] in the form of two independent sub-sample s1 and s2 and the central sample[c] in the form of two independent subsample c1 and c2. Let matching ratio of state and central sample be m : n. Based on this, the respective estimates for state and central can be computed as: = ∑ ( + )/ and = ∑ ( + )/ Pooled estimate of these two estimates is given by weighing with matching participation rate m:n. Thus the pooled estimate is given by: = with ( ) = ( ) ( )( ) In general ( ) and ( ) can be estimated as ( ) = ∑ ( − ) /4 , ( ) = ∑ ( − ) /4 and thus = ( ) ( )( ) The pooled estimate will always lie between the estimates based on central and state sample separately.

Page 22: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

18

2.3 Summing up: For those characteristics which are known to be distributed as Normal, poolability of the two sets of central and state data may be tested by standard parametric tests such as Z-test. For those characteristics for which transformation makes them Normal, such methodology may be adopted. In most of the situations where the distribution is non-normal and unknown, the two sets of data may be tested through various non-parametric tests such as those laid down in para 1 of above. For discrete data, Standard tests of equality of proportions based on binomial distribution may be used and for multinomial distributions relevant chi-square tests may be used.

Page 23: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

19

CHAPTER-5 Poolability Test Results

Poolability test were undertaken and the test results are given below; Table 5.1(R): District wise results of Run test of MPCE (URP, MRP, MMRP) for Pooled sample

Sector:Rural (Schedule 1.0 Type-1 and Type -II)

Z0.01 = -2.33 [one sided test] reject if z-value < Z0.01

District code

District Name MPCE-URP MPCE-MRP MPCE-MMRP Z-Value ACCEPT Z-Value ACCEPT Z-value Accept

1 Nandurbar -1.3 Y -0.75 Y -3.039 N 2 Dhule -2.03 Y 1.2 Y -4.920 N 3 Jalgaon -0.85 Y -2.19 Y -1.742 Y 4 Buldhana 0.13 Y 0.46 Y -0.250 Y 5 Akola -2.66 N -2.17 Y -0.532 Y 6 Washim 1.6 Y -1.03 Y -2.485 N 7 Amravati -0.19 Y 1.49 Y 0.501 Y 8 Wardha 0.45 Y 0.11 Y -0.177 Y 9 Nagpur 0.14 Y 1.17 Y -0.579 Y 10 Bhandara -3.37 N -3.66 N -2.405 N 11 Gondia 0.22 Y -0.22 Y -1.013 Y 12 Gadchiroli -4.26 N -4.13 N -2.307 Y 13 Chandrapur -0.14 Y -2.23 Y -2.750 N 14 Yavatmal -0.06 Y -0.16 Y -1.509 Y 15 Nanded -1.9 Y 1.7 Y -2.016 Y 16 Hingoli -3.02 N -3.48 N 0.000 Y 17 Parbhani -0.18 Y -1.34 Y -1.242 Y 18 Jalna 1.01 Y -2.01 Y 0.217 Y 19 Aurangabad 0.5 Y 0.2 Y 0.314 Y 20 Nashik 1.04 Y 0.44 Y -2.781 N 21 Thane -1.63 Y 1.6 Y -2.146 Y 24 Raigad -1.83 Y 0.07 Y 1.588 Y 25 Pune 0.36 Y -0.6 Y -0.563 Y 26 Ahmednagar -1.07 Y -1.64 Y -1.484 Y 27 Beed -0.81 Y -1.6 Y 0.313 Y 28 Latur -0.44 Y 1.08 Y -0.250 Y 29 Osmanabad -1.16 Y -1.43 Y -0.868 Y 30 Solapur 1.12 Y -2.26 Y -0.920 Y 31 Satara -1.07 Y -2.31 Y 0.224 Y 32 Ratnagiri -0.75 Y -2.11 Y 1.127 Y 33 Sindhudurg 0.8 Y -0.29 Y 1.420 Y 34 Kolhapur -0.26 Y -2.29 Y -0.767 Y 35 Sangli -1.3 Y -0.75 Y -1.177 Y

Page 24: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

20

Table 5.1(U): District wise results of Run test of MPCE (URP, MRP, MMRP) for Pooled sample

Sector:Urban (Schedule 1.0 Type-1 and Type -II)

Z0.01 = -2.33 [one sided test] reject if z-value < Z0.01

District code

District Name MPCE-URP MPCE-MRP MPCE-MMRP Z-Value ACCEPT Z-Value ACCEPT Z-value Accept

1 Nandurbar -1.95 Y -0.86 Y -0.385 Y 2 Dhule -0.01 Y 1.34 Y -0.297 Y 3 Jalgaon -1.47 Y -0.53 Y -0.230 Y 4 Buldhana 1.19 Y -1.65 Y 0.311 Y 5 Akola -1.62 Y -0.23 Y -0.959 Y 6 Washim 0.77 Y 1.56 Y -0.616 Y 7 Amravati -1.74 Y -1.27 Y -0.705 Y 8 Wardha -0.96 Y -0.04 Y -2.611 N 9 Nagpur 0.13 Y -0.22 Y -0.250 Y 10 Bhandara -2.47 N -2.39 N 0.077 Y 11 Gondia -0.33 Y -1.57 Y -1.120 Y 12 Gadchiroli 0.31 Y 0.87 Y -0.848 Y 13 Chandrapur 0.53 Y 0.19 Y -1.620 Y 14 Yavatmal 0.53 Y 0.84 Y 0.033 Y 15 Nanded -0.79 Y 0.98 Y -2.446 N 16 Hingoli -0.62 Y -1.59 Y 1.926 Y 17 Parbhani 1.63 Y 1.55 Y 0.417 Y 18 Jalna -0.79 Y 1.08 Y -0.132 Y 19 Aurangabad -2.1 Y -2.81 N 0.171 Y 20 Nashik -1.47 Y 0.14 Y -2.034 Y 21 Thane -0.8 Y 0.35 Y -0.699 Y 22 Mumbai 0.15 Y 0.46 Y -0.606 Y 24 Raigad 0.58 Y -0.52 Y -1.726 Y 25 Pune -1.28 Y 1.66 Y -1.780 Y 26 Ahmednagar -2.41 N -2.21 Y 0.000 Y 27 Beed -0.79 Y 1.63 Y -2.281 Y 28 Latur -0.3 Y 0.72 Y 0.364 Y 29 Osmanabad 0.08 Y -0.08 Y -0.154 Y 30 Solapur -1.12 Y 1.58 Y -1.353 Y 31 Satara -3.27 N -3.43 N -0.793 Y 32 Ratnagiri 0.31 Y -1.36 Y 0.308 Y 33 Sindhudurg 1 Y 1.5 Y -0.385 Y 34 Kolhapur 0.43 Y 1.55 Y 0.535 Y 35 Sangli -0.63 Y 0.51 Y -0.463 Y

Page 25: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

21

Table 5.2(R): District wise Chi-Square test results of persons over worker, unemployed and out of labour force for PS+SS, CWS and CDS status of Pooled sample

Sector: Rural (Schedule 10) χ2.01 = 9.21 df = 2 [one sided test] reject if χ2-value > χ2.01

District Code District Name

PS+SS CWS CDS χ2 value ACCEPT χ2 value ACCEPT χ2 value ACCEPT

1 Nandurbar 1.68 Y 21.75 N 35.39 N 2 Dhule 5.09 Y 10.62 N 15.98 N 3 Jalgaon 12.28 N 25.40 N 74.61 N 4 Buldhana 1.29 Y 1.58 Y 15.33 N 5 Akola 6.66 Y 7.21 Y 18.71 N 6 Washim 16.17 N 19.41 N 22.00 N 7 Amravati 11.06 N 10.28 N 43.75 N 8 Wardha 0.28 Y 0.03 Y 0.85 Y 9 Nagpur 5.89 Y 5.64 Y 10.82 N

10 Bhandara 8.80 Y 0.12 Y 3.30 Y 11 Gondia 9.41 N 3.50 Y 13.86 N 12 Gadchiroli 3.18 Y 1.36 Y 2.67 Y 13 Chandrapur 9.88 N 3.12 Y 5.25 Y 14 Yavatmal 3.04 Y 1.22 Y 53.22 N 15 Nanded 3.65 Y 2.29 Y 1.70 Y 16 Hingoli 0.30 Y 0.04 Y 2.38 Y 17 Parbhani 9.01 Y 9.60 N 22.73 N 18 Jalna 7.09 Y 3.53 Y 11.66 N 19 Aurangabad 16.92 N 12.78 N 14.69 N 20 Nashik 5.58 Y 3.61 Y 6.58 Y 21 Thane 9.28 N 1.88 Y 6.58 Y 24 Raigad 6.58 Y 3.07 Y 1.03 Y 25 Pune 5.59 Y 23.41 N 28.41 N 26 Ahmednagar 12.83 N 5.44 Y 31.18 N 27 Beed 6.92 Y 5.92 Y 18.38 N 28 Latur 0.72 Y 0.75 Y 3.19 Y 29 Osmanabad 18.27 N 17.85 N 23.87 N 30 Solapur 0.92 Y 0.13 Y 10.80 N 31 Satara 1.56 Y 16.42 N 13.00 N 32 Ratnagiri 22.94 N 23.58 N 16.59 N 33 Sindhudurg 14.70 N 12.27 N 16.69 N 34 Kolhapur 2.56 Y 11.06 N 5.68 Y 35 Sangli 3.08 Y 7.23 Y 4.50 Y

Page 26: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

22

Table 5.2(U): District wise Chi-Square test results of persons over worker, unemployed and out of labour force for PS+SS, CWS and CDS of Pooled sample

Sector: Urban (Schedule 10) χ2.01 = 9.21 df = 2 [one sided test] reject if χ2-value > χ2.01

District Code District Name PS+SS CWS CDS

χ2 value Accept χ2 value Accept χ2 value Accept 1 Nandurbar 6.87 Y 5.58 Y 1.84 Y 2 Dhule 0.25 Y 5.28 Y 12.41 N 3 Jalgaon 1.87 Y 2.22 Y 8.54 Y 4 Buldhana 0.09 Y 2.06 Y 5.38 Y 5 Akola 5.27 Y 3.37 Y 5.80 Y 6 Washim 0.32 Y 4.13 Y 11.17 N 7 Amravati 1.00 Y 2.39 Y 4.10 Y 8 Wardha 6.41 Y 4.61 Y 10.35 N 9 Nagpur 0.09 Y 4.56 Y 6.25 Y

10 Bhandara 8.73 Y 8.59 Y 16.58 N 11 Gondia 0.35 Y 1.15 Y 3.84 Y 12 Gadchiroli 0.01 Y 0.42 Y 0.57 Y 13 Chandrapur 1.26 Y 0.43 Y 0.98 Y 14 Yavatmal 0.52 Y 0.97 Y 5.30 Y 15 Nanded 1.29 Y 0.39 Y 0.36 Y 16 Hingoli 1.17 Y 0.74 Y 0.12 Y 17 Parbhani 4.58 Y 5.81 Y 20.06 N 18 Jalna 5.63 Y 5.35 Y 9.49 N 19 Aurangabad 1.06 Y 2.55 Y 7.24 Y 20 Nashik 4.14 Y 3.84 Y 0.93 Y 21 Thane 0.41 Y 0.15 Y 0.43 Y 22 Mumbai 9.02 Y 14.59 N 20.30 N 24 Raigad 1.41 Y 1.91 Y 5.04 Y 25 Pune 6.61 Y 4.20 Y 1.86 Y 26 Ahmednagar 6.12 Y 4.73 Y 11.06 N 27 Beed 2.38 Y 0.18 Y 8.55 Y 28 Latur 0.47 Y 0.57 Y 3.21 Y 29 Osmanabad 7.38 Y 7.38 Y 12.54 N 30 Solapur 4.16 Y 1.42 Y 17.51 N 31 Satara 6.45 Y 9.15 Y 6.08 Y 32 Ratnagiri 0.63 Y 0.63 Y 2.21 Y 33 Sindhudurg 0.29 Y 0.68 Y 1.71 Y 34 Kolhapur 2.48 Y 2.92 Y 3.20 Y 35 Sangli 0.08 Y 0.08 Y 0.39 Y

Page 27: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

23

CHAPTER – 6 POOLED RESULTS OF MPCE, WPR AND LFPR

Table 6.1(R): District wise estimated number of households and their RSE's for central, state and pooled samples

Sector: Rural (Schedule 1.0 Type-1)

District Code District Name

Estimated no. of Households RSE Sample Households

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled

1 Nandurbar 243432 236083 239758 237671 7.54 4.08 8.65 7.18 96 96 192 2 Dhule 300289 283212 291751 290918 2.24 2.15 3.11 3.11 96 96 192 3 Jalgaon 644622 514847 579735 576470 5.47 6.51 8.39 8.43 192 175 367 4 Buldhana 404892 434719 419806 429145 1.54 0.69 1.64 1.25 128 128 256 5 Akola 208118 239657 223888 211290 1.14 2.95 3.33 2.12 64 64 128 6 Washim 195425 202189 198807 195902 1.08 3.8 4.01 2.08 64 64 128 7 Amravati 341244 409388 375316 401035 1.88 0.59 1.83 1.12 128 128 256 8 Wardha 192898 217169 205034 214386 4.82 1.54 4.82 2.94 64 64 128 9 Nagpur 303769 310751 307260 310739 5.22 0.22 5.17 0.43 96 96 192 10 Bhandara 223883 205366 214625 219305 1.99 3.78 4.17 3.52 64 64 128 11 Gondiya 252060 236742 244401 239048 0.54 0.24 0.60 0.44 96 96 192 12 Gadchiroli 211708 207812 209760 208737 3.14 1.79 3.63 3.11 64 64 128 13 Chandrapur 456887 341839 399363 454022 0.5 4.18 3.62 0.99 96 96 192 14 Yavatmal 479459 491365 485412 481990 2.01 3.78 4.32 3.56 160 160 320 15 Nanded 377730 452382 415056 384281 1.48 3.99 4.56 2.79 160 160 320 16 Hingoli 174199 198231 186215 174484 0.93 7.48 8.01 1.85 64 64 128 17 Parbhani 220795 208950 214873 216769 3.01 4.44 5.31 4.99 64 64 128 18 Jalna 312085 280207 296146 300435 2.09 3.07 3.65 3.47 96 96 192 19 Aurangabad 483792 326061 404927 341964 4.04 2.01 5.09 3.63 128 128 256 20 Nashik 492691 604438 548565 562850 3.4 2.13 3.85 3.63 192 184 376 21 Thane 505531 616635 561083 521149 1.36 2.75 3.26 2.44 157 160 317 24 Raigad 367530 436697 402114 399377 1.88 1.71 2.53 2.54 119 128 247 25 Pune 665888 654224 660056 657366 2.1 1.3 2.48 2.21 189 192 381

Page 28: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

24

District Code District Name

Estimated no. of Households RSE Sample Households

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled

26 Ahmednagar 734372 668775 701574 701056 0.46 0.5 0.67 0.67 191 192 383 27 Bid 441635 400220 420928 402966 3.1 0.91 3.37 1.75 128 128 256 28 Latur 334835 365862 350349 339751 0.83 1.75 1.99 1.50 128 128 256 29 Osmanabad 271854 270669 271262 271750 0.91 2.94 3.08 1.74 96 96 192 30 Solapur 565709 568969 567339 566359 1.03 2.06 2.31 1.85 192 192 384 31 Satara 547633 524040 535837 546802 0.49 2.68 2.67 0.96 159 160 319 32 Ratnagiri 349723 350562 350143 350502 2.3 0.64 2.38 1.23 128 128 256 33 Sindhudurg 175413 163704 169559 171368 0.53 0.79 0.94 0.88 64 63 127 34 Kolhapur 528442 585920 557181 529213 0.33 2.54 2.69 0.65 192 192 384 35 Sangli 420151 472635 446393 447816 1.21 1.02 1.57 1.57 160 160 320

Maharashtra 12428697 12480320 12454509 12453109 0.49 0.51 0.70 0.70 4015 4006 8021

MR- Matching Ratio method IV-Inverse Variance method

Page 29: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

25

Table 6.1(U): District wise estimated number of households and their RSE's for central, state and pooled samples

Sector: Urban (Schedule 1.0 Type-1)

District Code District

Estimated no. of Households RSE of Estimated Households Sample Households

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled

1 Nandurbar 45824 25226 33465 25227 0.11 12.27 0.38 0.23 32 63 95 2 Dhule 79794 75914 77466 75945 1.28 13.53 0.26 2.54 63 96 159 3 Jalgaon 193785 158582 172663 166947 6.38 9.35 0.17 10.58 96 160 256 4 Buldhana 86327 82943 84297 82945 0.22 9.44 0.25 0.45 64 96 160 5 Akola 73547 129718 107250 83006 9.12 7.24 0.23 11.70 64 96 160 6 Washim 23664 36958 31640 30936 4.19 7.18 0.41 7.40 32 64 96 7 Amravati 194019 165682 177017 170156 4.59 9.04 0.17 8.19 96 160 256 8 Wardha 63373 61335 62150 61756 2.54 4.82 0.29 4.50 64 96 160 9 Nagpur 627487 537668 573596 617189 1.22 0.38 0.09 0.72 253 376 629 10 Bhandara 40449 23283 30149 38081 5.22 1.2 0.40 2.37 32 64 96 11 Gondiya 48399 27923 36113 41832 4.00 1.58 0.37 3.02 32 64 96 12 Gadchiroli 25166 13652 18258 14424 2.71 5.49 0.52 4.96 32 64 96 13 Chandrapur 146991 138192 141712 140235 6.23 10.65 0.19 10.76 64 96 160 14 Yavatmal 102729 118964 112470 114809 3.34 6.59 0.22 5.97 64 96 160 15 Nanded 153984 102229 122931 110001 5.34 8.44 0.20 9.15 64 96 160 16 Hingoli 37188 36281 36644 36984 18.04 9.5 0.38 16.81 32 64 96 17 Parbhani 77147 70094 72915 71318 2.2 4.37 0.27 3.94 64 95 159 18 Jalna 35446 98170 73080 35903 16.9 4.01 0.28 7.89 64 96 160 19 Aurangabad 308445 234549 264107 237516 3.38 12.58 0.14 6.55 96 160 256 20 Nashik 312454 330067 323022 327751 1.41 3.83 0.13 2.64 192 320 512 21 Thane 1877616 1764047 1809475 1799582 2.42 3.37 0.05 3.93 564 864 1428 22 Mumbai 2704835 3061751 2918985 2713309 9.83 1.74 0.04 3.42 766 908 1674 24 Raigad 200809 167954 181096 175445 8.78 13.51 0.17 14.76 64 96 160 25 Pune 1211471 1378905 1311931 1319287 2.29 3.51 0.06 3.85 415 638 1053 26 Ahmednagar 170264 197360 186522 171928 15.09 4.48 0.17 8.59 96 160 256

Page 30: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

26

District Code District

Estimated no. of Households RSE of Estimated Households Sample Households

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled

27 Bid 59002 84609 74366 75065 5.46 10.15 0.27 9.74 64 96 160 28 Latur 81675 131346 111478 111428 3.11 6.11 0.22 5.67 64 96 160 29 Osmanabad 35091 40996 38634 40531 2.3 9.19 0.37 4.46 32 64 96 30 Solapur 255333 223264 236092 227536 3.39 7.56 0.15 6.20 128 192 320 31 Satara 119033 95523 104927 98331 14.65 31.92 0.22 26.70 64 96 160 32 Ratnagiri 34965 67264 54344 44035 21.2 25.48 0.32 34.32 32 64 96 33 Sindhudurg 19415 13448 15835 18196 8.99 3.16 0.56 6.01 32 64 96 34 Kolhapur 169974 238820 211282 238780 0.14 8.34 0.16 0.28 95 160 255 35 Sangli 124596 136857 131953 133668 5.07 9.39 0.20 8.93 64 96 160

Maharashtra 9740294 10069569 9937859 9782609 3.08 1.22 0.02 2.27 3980 6016 9996

Page 31: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

27

Table 6.2(R): District wise estimated number of persons and their RSE's for central, state and pooled samples

Sector: Rural (Schedule 1.0 Type-1)

District Code District

Estimated no. of persons (00) RSE of Estimated persons

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled (IV)

1 Nandurbar 13534 10762 12148 11680 6.65 5.88 9.06 8.872 Dhule 14188 13393 13791 13593 3.18 1.95 3.78 3.333 Jalgaon 25181 22414 23797 25160 0.31 4.05 3.82 0.624 Buldhana 18543 21905 20224 21798 5.22 0.8 4.86 1.595 Akola 9494 11745 10620 11575 5.66 1.31 5.27 2.566 Washim 8138 9664 8901 8655 2.88 3.38 4.51 4.397 Amravati 15413 18999 17206 17180 6.44 5.3 8.22 8.238 Wardha 7356 9182 8269 8472 8.41 5.38 9.57 9.119 Nagpur 13309 13293 13301 13302 5.26 6.07 8.03 7.95

10 Bhandara 10905 9552 10228 10616 2.74 6 6.32 4.9911 Gondia 9925 11172 10548 10019 0.75 2.32 2.56 1.4212 Gadchiroli 9507 8822 9165 9501 0.52 5.98 5.78 1.0413 Chandrapur 18166 14813 16489 18141 0.4 5.72 5.16 0.8114 Yavatmal 19589 23617 21603 20439 2.39 3.83 4.71 4.0715 Nanded 19172 21776 20474 19890 1.15 1.64 2.04 1.8816 Hingoli 9883 9444 9664 9581 4.96 3.5 6.12 5.7217 Parbhani 11097 11294 11196 11164 3.93 5.36 6.66 6.3418 Jalna 13191 13584 13387 13552 5.32 1.53 5.46 2.9419 Aurangabad 21516 14571 18043 14757 8.61 2.11 10.4 4.1120 Nashik 26943 30198 28571 28543 3.41 3.09 4.58 4.5921 Thane 25464 26709 26087 25490 0.59 3.89 4.02 1.1624 Raigad 14415 16209 15312 15346 4.17 3.57 5.45 5.4325 Pune 31064 29429 30247 30627 1.08 1.89 2.15 1.8826 Ahmednagar 35533 31510 33522 35060 0.64 1.96 1.96 1.2127 Bid 20845 22899 21872 21652 1.92 2.17 2.91 2.8828 Latur 16532 18019 17276 18018 7.73 0.23 7.4 0.4629 Osmanabad 12592 13396 12994 12988 1.57 1.5 2.17 2.1730 Solapur 26525 24335 25430 24556 3.49 1.28 3.84 2.431 Satara 24807 22239 23523 22870 6.52 4.15 7.92 7.0232 Ratnagiri 13822 12869 13345 12998 10.29 4.37 11.46 8.0433 Sindhudurg 7674 6729 7201 7674 0.07 5.15 4.82 0.1534 Kolhapur 23105 27312 25208 24516 3.2 3.81 5.06 4.9135 Sangli 17836 20550 19193 19175 2.4 2.11 3.18 3.18

Maharashtra 565262 572405 568834 569546 0.76 0.61 0.97 0.95

Page 32: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

28

Table 6.2 (U): District wise estimated number of persons and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Urban (Schedule 1.0 Type-1)

District Code District

Estimated no.of persons (00) RSE of Estimated persons

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

1 Nandurbar 1893 1457 1631 1468 3.65 0.78 0.18 1.522 Dhule 3657 3703 3685 3703 19.72 1.62 0.12 3.243 Jalgaon 9492 7925 8552 8364 7.7 5.75 0.08 9.254 Buldhana 4730 3620 4064 3632 11.84 1.57 0.11 3.115 Akola 3293 5972 4900 4026 7.4 6.65 0.11 10.326 Washim 1258 2007 1707 1562 6.3 4.78 0.18 7.837 Amravati 8158 6967 7443 8081 0.46 2.03 0.08 0.898 Wardha 2865 2534 2666 2566 2.27 0.85 0.14 1.599 Nagpur 28293 21777 24383 21959 6.13 1.35 0.05 2.6410 Bhandara 1565 940 1190 1073 6.19 5.37 0.2 8.3411 Gondiya 2171 1189 1582 2161 0.3 5.3 0.18 0.612 Gadchiroli 1033 522 727 551 3.96 1.9 0.26 3.513 Chandrapur 6930 5567 6112 5583 12.47 1.7 0.09 3.3614 Yavatmal 5359 4704 4966 4865 8.43 5.49 0.1 9.2115 Nanded 8441 5685 6787 7940 3.58 11.26 0.09 6.8816 Hingoli 1770 2068 1949 1786 5.12 18.29 0.16 9.8617 Parbhani 4280 4073 4156 4183 2.41 2.7 0.11 3.618 Jalna 1854 4833 3641 1935 5.27 12.13 0.12 9.9619 Aurangabad 15134 10297 12232 10409 14.17 3.2 0.06 6.2620 Nashik 14230 16254 15444 15117 1.71 1.69 0.06 2.4121 Thane 72834 73663 73331 73192 1.67 1.9 0.03 2.5122 Mumbai 103564 120616 113795 103599 0.35 6.6 0.02 0.6924 Raigad 7177 7412 7318 7402 12.24 2.46 0.08 4.8325 Pune 45246 52749 49748 50423 3.16 1.82 0.03 3.1526 Ahmednagar 7035 9838 8717 7052 1.96 18.34 0.08 3.9127 Bid 2894 5163 4255 4942 14.4 2.65 0.11 5.2728 Latur 3764 6476 5391 6446 3.64 0.22 0.1 0.4529 Osmanabad 1759 2261 2060 2174 2.26 0.8 0.16 1.5230 Solapur 13569 10374 11652 10872 5.97 3.36 0.07 5.8831 Satara 3752 3834 3801 3811 24.64 14.85 0.12 25.4432 Ratnagiri 1285 2344 1920 1595 23.21 19.81 0.17 31.4833 Sindhudurg 802 467 601 579 4.99 6.08 0.29 834 Kolhapur 8117 9862 9164 9002 9.85 8 0.08 12.4735 Sangli 5491 5179 5304 5427 3.75 7.86 0.1 6.77

Maharashtra 403693 422333 414877 407251 1.02 2.02 0.01 1.83

Page 33: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

29

Table 6.3: District wise estimated household size for central, state and pooled sample (Schedule 1.0, Type-1)

District Code

District Name

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Rural Urban

1 Nandurbar 5.6 4.6 5.1 4.9 4.1 5.8 4.9 5.82 Dhule 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.9 4.8 4.93 Jalgaon 3.9 4.4 4.1 4.4 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.04 Buldhana 4.6 5.0 4.8 5.1 5.5 4.4 4.8 4.45 Akola 4.6 4.9 4.7 5.5 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.96 Washim 4.2 4.8 4.5 4.4 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.07 Amravati 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.78 Wardha 3.8 4.2 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.1 4.3 4.29 Nagpur 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.5 4.1 4.3 3.610 Bhandara 4.9 4.7 4.8 4.8 3.9 4.0 3.9 2.811 Gondiya 3.9 4.7 4.3 4.2 4.5 4.3 4.4 5.212 Gadchiroli 4.5 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.1 3.8 4.0 3.813 Chandrapur 4.0 4.3 4.1 4.0 4.7 4.0 4.3 4.014 Yavatmal 4.1 4.8 4.5 4.2 5.2 4.0 4.4 4.215 Nanded 5.1 4.8 4.9 5.2 5.5 5.6 5.5 7.216 Hingoli 5.7 4.8 5.2 5.5 4.8 5.7 5.3 4.817 Parbhani 5.0 5.4 5.2 5.2 5.5 5.8 5.7 5.918 Jalna 4.2 4.8 4.5 4.5 5.2 4.9 5.0 5.419 Aurangabad 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.3 4.9 4.4 4.6 4.420 Nashik 5.5 5.0 5.2 5.1 4.6 4.9 4.8 4.621 Thane 5.0 4.3 4.6 4.9 3.9 4.2 4.1 4.122 Mumbai --- --- --- --- 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.824 Raigad 3.9 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.6 4.4 4.0 4.225 Pune 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.826 Ahmednagar 4.8 4.7 4.8 5.0 4.1 5.0 4.7 4.127 Bid 4.7 5.7 5.2 5.4 4.9 6.1 5.7 6.628 Latur 4.9 4.9 4.9 5.3 4.6 4.9 4.8 5.829 Osmanabad 4.6 4.9 4.8 4.8 5.0 5.5 5.3 5.430 Solapur 4.7 4.3 4.5 4.3 5.3 4.6 4.9 4.831 Satara 4.5 4.2 4.4 4.2 3.2 4.0 3.6 3.932 Ratnagiri 4.0 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.633 Sindhudurg 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.5 4.1 3.5 3.8 3.234 Kolhapur 4.4 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.8 4.1 4.3 3.835 Sangali 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.4 3.8 4.0 4.1

Maharashtra 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2

Page 34: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

30

Table 6.4(R): District wise estimated sex ratio and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Rural (Schedule 1.0 Type-1)

District Code District

Sex Ratio RSE of Sex Ratio

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

1 Nandurbar 1128 822 975 889 7.89 5.76 5.17 4.702 Dhule 1002 943 972 981 3.43 4.97 2.99 2.823 Jalgaon 755 829 792 756 0.87 5.76 3.04 0.864 Buldhana 904 1194 1049 946 2.63 4.85 2.99 2.325 Akola 942 1029 986 1004 4.47 2.58 2.53 2.246 Washim 930 738 834 803 7.56 6.83 5.18 5.107 Amravati 967 1006 987 996 12.96 7.27 7.35 6.348 Wardha 1021 1031 1026 1025 2.91 3.55 2.30 2.259 Nagpur 931 1191 1061 988 5.76 8.49 5.40 4.80

10 Bhandara 869 776 822 826 7.65 9.24 5.94 5.9011 Gondiya 931 917 924 921 1.39 0.87 0.82 0.7412 Gadchiroli 719 1013 866 719 0.35 8.87 5.19 0.3413 Chandrapur 1055 1160 1108 1156 10.00 1.85 4.86 1.8214 Yavatmal 881 803 842 804 4.71 0.62 2.48 0.6215 Nanded 784 834 809 802 3.28 4.16 2.67 2.5716 Hingoli 1001 855 928 923 4.23 4.58 3.11 3.1217 Parbhani 844 1135 989 1064 6.48 2.73 3.17 2.5318 Jalna 912 825 868 826 6.46 0.72 3.41 0.7219 Aurangabad 931 967 949 965 7.67 1.44 3.83 1.4220 Nashik 943 1018 980 948 0.71 2.33 1.25 0.6721 Thane 1070 891 981 1044 1.16 3.37 1.66 1.1024 Raigad 1056 1089 1073 1074 2.09 1.84 1.39 1.3825 Pune 880 901 890 887 2.06 2.94 1.80 1.6926 Ahmednagar 926 830 878 901 2.26 4.28 2.35 2.0027 Bid 866 1055 960 1047 3.92 0.65 1.80 0.6428 Latur 983 894 938 897 9.03 1.93 4.82 1.8929 Osmanabad 952 745 848 952 0.09 2.30 1.01 0.1030 Solapur 1065 899 982 922 3.17 1.48 1.85 1.3531 Satara 1019 922 970 986 5.23 8.18 4.76 4.4132 Ratnagiri 1013 1180 1097 1174 10.16 1.66 4.77 1.6333 Sindhudurg 1058 1009 1033 1056 1.35 7.81 3.88 1.3334 Kolhapur 925 930 928 926 2.08 5.89 3.13 1.9635 Sangli 917 1000 958 971 4.82 3.26 2.86 2.70

Maharashtra 938 940 939 939 0.88 0.81 0.60 0.59

Page 35: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

31

Table 6.4(U): District wise estimated sex ratio and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Urban (Schedule 1.0 Type-1)

District Code District

Sex Ratio RSE of Sex Ratio

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

1 Nandurbar 980 952 963 953 5.66 1.13 2.32 1.102 Dhule 844 959 913 957 20.36 2.83 2.40 2.803 Jalgaon 942 913 924 921 7.40 4.78 2.37 4.014 Buldhana 976 916 940 916 15.68 0.48 2.34 0.485 Akola 1007 954 975 964 7.24 3.65 2.30 3.266 Washim 939 970 958 966 11.16 3.80 2.33 3.607 Amravati 927 920 922 925 2.68 4.04 2.37 2.238 Wardha 908 928 920 919 3.23 2.81 2.38 2.129 Nagpur 964 991 980 986 7.13 3.36 2.31 3.04

10 Bhandara 1226 929 1048 1140 4.49 9.26 2.20 4.0711 Gondiya 1142 868 978 1003 3.12 4.05 2.28 2.4912 Gadchiroli 1194 985 1069 1068 2.08 2.04 2.19 1.4713 Chandrapur 846 886 870 886 15.29 0.57 2.45 0.5814 Yavatmal 992 885 928 957 3.81 6.08 2.35 3.2315 Nanded 884 879 881 884 2.88 11.11 2.43 2.7916 Hingoli 882 1077 999 894 6.04 19.15 2.30 5.7617 Parbhani 804 962 899 917 4.15 2.20 2.42 1.9518 Jalna 1003 841 906 1000 1.70 15.18 2.38 1.6919 Aurangabad 951 895 917 899 13.13 3.80 2.37 3.6520 Nashik 1033 925 968 1020 0.58 1.78 2.31 0.5521 Thane 864 874 870 870 2.17 1.92 2.45 1.4422 Mumbai 856 963 920 860 0.77 3.94 2.39 0.7624 Raigad 1057 748 871 758 9.03 2.30 2.40 2.2425 Pune 887 900 895 898 4.01 1.98 2.41 1.7826 Ahmednagar 914 972 949 915 1.20 17.83 2.35 1.2027 Bid 981 872 915 896 11.72 7.00 2.37 6.0228 Latur 806 884 852 850 5.27 4.20 2.48 3.2929 Osmanabad 925 875 895 878 5.83 1.54 2.40 1.4930 Solapur 888 1053 987 953 6.12 6.36 2.31 4.4231 Satara 1165 975 1051 1020 22.61 15.17 2.21 12.6432 Ratnagiri 959 1080 1031 1028 27.28 20.94 2.26 16.6433 Sindhudurg 1001 973 984 980 2.49 1.51 2.30 1.2934 Kolhapur 916 868 887 889 14.09 12.90 2.41 9.5235 Sangli 1126 1110 1116 1121 4.01 6.17 2.16 3.36

Maharashtra 904 926 917 913 1.12 1.36 2.38 0.87

Page 36: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

32

Table 6.5(R): District wise Estimate of MPCE (URP) and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample Sector: Rural (Schedule 1.0 Type-1)

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (URP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (URP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

1 Nandurbar Food 419.39 352.84 386.12 383.07 4.09 4.43 3.01 3.02 Non-Food 333.36 261.19 297.27 268.96 9.52 4.22 5.65 3.87 Total 752.75 614.03 683.39 645.17 6.47 4.27 4.05 3.58

2 Dhule Food 506.36 380.12 443.24 400.64 3.33 1.95 2.08 1.70 Non-Food 350.49 298.02 324.26 306.87 3.34 1.77 1.98 1.57 Total 856.85 678.14 767.50 778.55 0.60 0.86 0.51 0.50

3 Jalgaon Food 542.94 441.78 492.36 457.08 2.85 1.48 1.70 1.32 Non-Food 596.49 395.40 495.94 396.09 13.21 1.17 7.96 1.17 Total 1139.43 837.18 988.30 841.28 8.15 1.30 4.73 1.29

4 Buldhana Food 468.74 413.79 441.27 451.73 1.72 2.90 1.64 1.48 Non-Food 394.59 309.93 352.26 388.77 2.50 11.73 5.35 2.45 Total 863.33 723.72 793.53 848.27 1.95 6.68 3.23 1.87

5 Akola Food 564.12 419.06 491.59 419.06 2.43 0.00 1.39 0.00 Non-Food 451.40 313.85 382.63 352.97 6.77 6.13 4.72 4.61 Total 1015.52 732.91 874.22 777.96 4.36 2.63 2.76 2.27

6 Washim Food 521.18 455.87 488.52 514.89 2.60 9.09 4.46 2.50 Non-Food 389.21 674.82 532.02 402.94 11.23 28.82 18.73 10.58 Total 910.39 1130.70 1020.54 922.63 6.29 20.87 11.89 6.03

7 Amravati Food 397.93 400.87 399.40 400.81 9.72 1.48 4.90 1.46 Non-Food 516.43 400.86 458.65 403.64 22.42 4.54 12.78 4.45 Total 914.36 801.73 858.05 804.41 16.88 3.00 9.10 2.96

8 Wardha Food 501.80 455.00 478.40 484.79 4.15 6.05 3.61 3.42 Non-Food 553.92 341.16 447.54 356.01 7.13 3.17 4.57 2.93 Total 1055.72 796.16 925.94 814.72 5.71 2.10 3.38 1.98

Page 37: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

33

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (URP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (URP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

9 Nagpur Food 542.55 493.56 518.06 494.15 5.62 0.68 2.96 0.68 Non-Food 509.56 448.43 479.00 451.31 3.66 0.92 2.00 0.90 Total 1052.11 941.99 997.05 944.89 1.50 0.28 0.80 0.27

10 Bhandara Food 408.05 496.67 452.36 452.05 4.00 3.31 2.56 2.56 Non-Food 280.29 523.33 401.81 282.85 1.77 9.20 6.02 1.75 Total 688.33 1020.00 854.17 720.88 3.09 6.33 3.98 2.81

11 Gondiya Food 388.92 454.12 421.52 420.52 1.45 1.28 0.96 0.96 Non-Food 346.73 358.07 352.40 356.22 3.30 1.41 1.77 1.30 Total 735.65 812.19 773.92 752.65 0.79 1.34 0.80 0.68

12 Gadchiroli Food 405.37 572.47 488.92 420.18 1.17 2.67 1.64 1.08 Non-Food 241.54 403.49 322.52 364.60 9.60 3.23 4.12 3.12 Total 646.91 975.96 811.44 809.35 4.32 2.90 2.45 2.46

13 Chandrapur Food 489.88 496.15 493.02 495.03 8.17 3.76 4.48 3.42 Non-Food 386.89 365.20 376.05 365.33 20.19 1.61 10.41 1.61 Total 876.77 861.36 869.06 861.54 13.47 1.49 6.83 1.48

14 Yavatmal Food 434.47 406.23 420.35 430.40 1.90 4.96 2.59 1.78 Non-Food 407.92 350.41 379.17 387.36 5.14 8.02 4.62 4.34 Total 842.39 756.64 799.52 835.27 1.72 6.38 3.15 1.67

15 Nanded Food 422.47 514.54 468.51 457.53 3.25 3.40 2.38 2.36 Non-Food 333.75 540.79 437.27 399.37 10.07 9.13 6.83 6.96 Total 756.22 1055.32 905.77 856.52 6.26 6.32 4.51 4.51

16 Hingoli Food 375.14 504.52 439.83 502.12 4.92 0.50 2.12 0.50 Non-Food 230.03 433.74 331.88 371.83 8.95 3.14 3.72 3.05 Total 605.17 938.26 771.71 913.48 6.45 1.18 2.63 1.17

17 Parbhani Food 430.56 517.64 474.10 460.04 0.73 0.85 0.57 0.56 Non-Food 313.69 474.44 394.06 313.98 0.67 10.47 6.31 0.67 Total 744.25 992.08 868.16 747.54 0.71 4.56 2.62 0.70

18 Jalna Food 516.79 554.20 535.50 539.57 6.01 4.49 3.71 3.60 Non-Food 454.78 515.02 484.90 470.70 7.19 10.59 6.56 5.96 Total 971.57 1069.22 1020.39 1009.82 6.56 7.43 4.99 4.92

Page 38: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

34

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (URP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (URP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

19 Aurangabad Food 587.44 558.15 572.80 576.11 2.92 3.87 2.41 2.33 Non-Food 578.76 405.83 492.30 474.39 3.29 3.80 2.49 2.53 Total 1166.21 963.98 1065.09 1165.46 0.16 3.23 1.47 0.16

20 Nashik Food 557.88 476.49 517.18 485.47 2.01 0.83 1.15 0.77 Non-Food 569.94 447.80 508.87 450.68 7.20 1.42 4.08 1.40 Total 1127.82 924.29 1026.06 929.94 3.76 0.78 2.10 0.76

21 Thane Food 514.50 557.05 535.77 535.13 2.83 2.69 1.95 1.95 Non-Food 637.60 517.72 577.66 636.67 0.79 10.98 4.94 0.79 Total 1152.10 1074.77 1113.44 1148.64 1.34 6.64 3.28 1.32

24 Raigad Food 640.55 626.12 633.34 626.76 6.55 1.45 3.39 1.41 Non-Food 845.75 673.59 759.67 738.10 20.10 19.54 14.15 14.10 Total 1486.31 1299.71 1393.01 1356.50 14.26 10.79 9.12 8.62

25 Pune Food 533.39 582.90 558.15 578.30 6.22 1.82 3.12 1.75 Non-Food 556.82 575.93 566.37 574.89 13.21 3.06 6.68 2.99 Total 1090.21 1158.83 1124.52 1158.48 9.79 0.66 4.76 0.65

26 Ahmednagar Food 557.97 483.20 520.58 484.52 2.85 0.44 1.54 0.44 Non-Food 491.43 470.32 480.87 489.96 0.92 3.52 1.79 0.89 Total 1049.39 953.52 1001.46 1023.38 1.09 1.96 1.09 0.95

27 Bid Food 609.25 586.66 597.95 590.37 2.94 1.35 1.64 1.23 Non-Food 584.15 576.71 580.43 582.55 3.36 6.50 3.64 2.98 Total 1193.39 1163.37 1178.38 1193.33 0.18 3.89 1.92 0.18

28 Latur Food 488.91 581.71 535.31 523.80 4.20 4.55 3.13 3.10 Non-Food 464.79 587.75 526.27 474.22 2.72 7.46 4.34 2.56 Total 953.70 1169.46 1061.58 993.00 3.48 6.01 3.66 3.02

29 Osmanabad Food 539.06 481.74 510.40 504.43 2.03 1.84 1.38 1.36 Non-Food 580.57 388.58 484.58 464.62 4.30 5.20 3.32 3.38 Total 1119.64 870.32 994.98 969.05 3.21 3.34 2.32 2.33

30 Solapur Food 546.80 560.63 553.72 559.08 1.76 0.61 0.92 0.58 Non-Food 730.65 416.45 573.55 419.85 4.97 0.91 3.18 0.90 Total 1277.45 977.09 1127.27 983.95 3.15 0.63 1.81 0.62

Page 39: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

35

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (URP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (URP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

31 Satara Food 544.27 612.82 578.55 545.48 0.47 3.12 1.67 0.47 Non-Food 583.93 686.14 635.04 611.34 8.27 11.63 7.34 6.76 Total 1128.20 1298.96 1213.58 1163.98 4.51 7.61 4.58 3.89

32 Ratnagiri Food 534.54 541.64 538.09 538.45 0.76 0.67 0.51 0.50 Non-Food 464.86 559.42 512.14 493.35 1.83 2.31 1.51 1.44 Total 999.41 1101.05 1050.23 1033.45 1.00 1.28 0.82 0.79

33 Sindhudurg Food 519.94 582.93 551.43 520.65 0.45 3.77 2.00 0.45 Non-Food 356.01 543.92 449.97 531.28 6.24 1.10 2.56 1.08 Total 875.95 1126.85 1001.40 985.34 2.80 2.48 1.86 1.87

34 Kolhapur Food 553.32 610.85 582.08 578.01 1.24 1.30 0.90 0.90 Non-Food 441.41 488.89 465.15 462.87 5.99 5.96 4.23 4.23 Total 994.73 1099.74 1047.23 1040.50 2.99 3.08 2.15 2.15

35 Sangali Food 572.96 614.34 593.65 587.05 2.19 2.84 1.81 1.73 Non-Food 493.32 416.21 454.77 426.37 7.73 3.57 4.50 3.25 Total 1066.28 1030.55 1048.42 1040.91 4.37 2.89 2.64 2.41

27 Maharashtra Food 515.16 514.43 514.79 514.67 0.72 0.51 0.44 0.41 Non-Food 495.77 466.37 481.07 479.00 1.82 1.68 1.24 1.23 Total 1010.93 980.80 995.87 993.09 1.16 1.00 0.77 0.76

Page 40: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

36

Table 6.5(U): District wise Estimate of MPCE (URP) and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Urban (Schedule 1.0 Type-1)

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (URP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (URP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

1 Nandurbar Food 770.86 631.85 687.45 734.92 0.93 1.92 1.14 0.84 Non-Food 622.78 702.34 670.52 647.63 4.80 6.32 4.35 3.83 Total 1393.64 1334.19 1357.97 1375.75 2.66 4.24 2.41 2.25

2 Dhule Food 595.63 619.66 610.05 616.36 11.76 4.52 5.35 4.22 Non-Food 903.47 702.87 783.11 720.83 32.90 13.26 16.78 12.34 Total 1499.10 1322.53 1393.16 1339.87 24.50 9.16 2.56 8.59

3 Jalgaon Food 574.58 609.90 595.77 609.84 8.55 0.32 3.30 0.32 Non-Food 506.90 687.55 615.29 670.89 14.19 3.33 5.18 3.26 Total 1081.48 1297.46 1211.07 1288.68 11.19 1.92 2.58 1.89

4 Buldhana Food 613.03 524.61 559.98 526.59 3.01 0.53 1.35 0.52 Non-Food 724.96 613.11 657.85 702.51 3.74 8.82 5.20 3.45 Total 1337.99 1137.71 1217.82 1332.48 0.64 4.50 2.52 0.64

5 Akola Food 623.32 515.13 558.41 575.75 3.84 5.25 3.37 3.11 Non-Food 739.27 624.72 670.54 671.82 9.38 9.28 6.63 6.62 Total 1362.59 1139.85 1228.95 1240.86 6.85 7.46 2.21 5.06

6 Washim Food 514.04 447.51 474.12 461.12 5.06 2.95 2.76 2.55 Non-Food 376.02 459.00 425.81 403.88 5.80 6.68 4.78 4.40 Total 890.06 906.51 899.93 890.21 0.47 4.84 2.75 0.47

7 Amravati Food 499.90 575.36 545.18 563.69 7.90 2.94 3.44 2.76 Non-Food 643.68 858.64 772.66 853.30 22.17 2.65 7.60 2.64 Total 1143.58 1434.00 1317.83 1433.70 15.93 0.41 1.93 0.41

8 Wardha Food 678.58 646.04 659.06 647.72 4.56 1.11 1.99 1.08 Non-Food 866.93 871.91 869.92 871.88 17.07 1.30 6.85 1.30 Total 1545.51 1517.95 1528.98 1517.97 11.57 0.27 1.59 0.27

9 Nagpur Food 714.07 681.65 694.62 693.40 2.37 1.87 1.47 1.47 Non-Food 1200.21 855.21 993.21 1001.47 3.36 4.05 2.65 2.62 Total 1914.28 1536.86 1687.83 1692.47 2.92 3.05 1.58 2.12

Page 41: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

37

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (URP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (URP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

10 Bhandara Food 438.70 549.22 505.01 461.40 4.41 6.92 4.77 3.73 Non-Food 553.99 826.45 717.46 629.77 7.70 8.32 6.22 5.76 Total 992.69 1375.66 1222.47 1010.15 2.35 7.76 2.22 2.26

11 Gondiya Food 580.21 681.68 641.09 608.85 2.58 3.50 2.42 2.08 Non-Food 661.52 1153.02 956.42 789.96 11.50 11.09 8.63 8.28 Total 1241.73 1834.70 1597.51 1398.63 7.33 8.27 1.93 5.58

12 Gadchiroli Food 593.63 710.51 663.76 605.43 2.73 6.80 4.47 2.54 Non-Food 868.91 690.84 762.07 716.62 24.41 12.63 13.08 11.26 Total 1462.54 1401.35 1425.83 1417.31 15.61 9.67 1.93 8.22

13 Chandrapur Food 617.67 691.58 662.01 673.01 7.60 3.93 3.76 3.50 Non-Food 706.58 764.05 741.06 742.12 8.71 6.33 5.13 5.12 Total 1324.25 1455.63 1403.08 1412.73 8.19 5.19 1.84 4.39

14 Yavatmal Food 539.24 548.78 544.96 541.16 0.75 1.47 0.94 0.67 Non-Food 679.66 793.34 747.87 682.29 0.65 3.63 2.32 0.64 Total 1218.90 1342.12 1292.83 1225.09 0.70 2.75 2.15 0.67

15 Nanded Food 498.78 565.17 538.61 556.47 1.25 0.43 0.54 0.41 Non-Food 605.85 577.98 589.13 584.36 13.64 7.79 7.25 6.77 Total 1104.63 1143.15 1127.74 1135.96 8.05 3.73 2.69 3.38

16 Hingoli Food 564.34 510.75 532.19 512.63 4.12 0.87 1.82 0.85 Non-Food 606.21 410.02 488.50 492.66 10.30 12.99 8.30 8.22 Total 1170.55 920.78 1020.69 998.71 7.32 6.26 1.34 4.79

17 Parbhani Food 492.64 530.65 515.45 521.02 1.55 0.84 0.79 0.74 Non-Food 370.04 469.65 429.80 469.08 5.76 0.34 1.99 0.34 Total 862.68 1000.29 945.25 977.66 1.58 0.61 1.24 0.57

18 Jalna Food 572.09 526.64 544.82 569.48 0.51 2.25 1.32 0.50 Non-Food 484.90 538.66 517.16 491.37 4.19 10.19 6.56 3.88 Total 1056.99 1065.30 1061.98 1057.89 2.20 6.26 1.22 2.07

19 Aurangabad Food 669.68 649.55 657.60 652.72 0.14 0.06 0.07 0.06 Non-Food 973.15 858.67 904.46 859.75 6.02 0.67 2.62 0.66 Total 1642.83 1508.21 1562.06 1509.71 3.51 0.41 1.04 0.40

Page 42: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

38

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (URP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (URP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

20 Nashik Food 675.90 563.85 608.67 563.95 3.63 0.13 1.61 0.13 Non-Food 823.32 655.67 722.73 665.44 6.16 1.93 3.00 1.84 Total 1499.22 1219.51 1331.40 1226.77 4.93 0.99 1.16 0.97

21 Thane Food 970.06 852.88 899.75 854.50 1.94 0.26 0.85 0.26 Non-Food 1604.54 1510.24 1547.96 1558.06 5.03 5.42 3.79 3.69 Total 2574.59 2363.12 2447.71 2449.65 3.84 3.48 0.83 2.58

22 Mumbai Food 1030.95 1051.13 1043.06 1045.48 4.67 2.86 2.53 2.44 Non-Food 1811.51 1827.97 1821.38 1820.57 11.05 9.89 7.40 7.37 Total 2842.46 2879.10 2864.44 2863.74 8.74 7.33 0.74 5.61

24 Raigad Food 959.84 908.85 929.25 959.50 0.56 7.30 4.29 0.56 Non-Food 2134.37 1328.48 1650.84 1565.15 10.51 10.89 7.56 7.77 Total 3094.20 2237.34 2580.08 2629.54 7.42 9.43 0.86 5.91

25 Pune Food 877.98 806.36 835.01 817.90 2.99 1.42 1.50 1.29 Non-Food 2108.88 1211.33 1570.35 1214.65 10.28 1.09 5.55 1.09 Total 2986.87 2017.69 2405.36 2027.56 8.10 1.22 0.91 1.20

26 Ahmednagar Food 743.62 699.95 717.42 736.02 0.29 0.68 0.41 0.27 Non-Food 817.75 745.58 774.44 817.28 0.24 3.31 1.91 0.24 Total 1561.37 1445.52 1491.86 1561.36 0.01 1.38 1.06 0.01

27 Bid Food 776.46 585.67 661.99 586.06 20.38 1.22 9.58 1.22 Non-Food 607.81 723.85 677.43 715.92 7.74 1.76 3.00 1.72 Total 1384.27 1309.52 1339.42 1309.57 14.83 0.43 1.11 0.43

28 Latur Food 456.06 600.06 542.46 456.99 0.33 3.11 2.07 0.33 Non-Food 562.53 681.67 634.02 642.27 4.45 2.58 2.29 2.24 Total 1018.59 1281.73 1176.47 1110.33 2.60 2.83 1.09 1.93

29 Osmanabad Food 596.49 430.69 497.01 436.29 1.63 0.42 0.82 0.41 Non-Food 554.95 517.20 532.30 545.09 2.93 5.29 3.32 2.57 Total 1151.44 947.89 1029.31 1047.77 2.26 2.70 1.32 1.74

30 Solapur Food 576.77 591.78 585.78 591.49 2.07 0.28 0.83 0.28 Non-Food 1353.71 544.09 867.94 550.88 8.92 2.04 5.62 2.01 Total 1930.48 1135.87 1453.72 1139.86 6.88 0.83 1.21 0.83

Page 43: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

39

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (URP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (URP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

31 Satara Food 755.05 643.05 687.85 753.10 0.51 4.50 2.54 0.51 Non-Food 968.85 964.29 966.11 965.62 12.25 7.88 6.81 6.63 Total 1723.90 1607.34 1653.96 1624.08 6.66 2.93 1.00 2.68

32 Ratnagiri Food 701.87 866.11 800.42 738.49 2.92 4.42 3.05 2.45 Non-Food 1079.32 1213.80 1160.01 1191.14 9.26 3.71 4.16 3.44 Total 1781.20 2079.91 1960.43 1983.29 6.76 4.00 0.86 3.45

33 Sindhudurg Food 683.18 757.09 727.52 757.07 6.12 0.07 2.30 0.07 Non-Food 709.23 691.45 698.56 696.94 14.99 10.27 8.62 8.47 Total 1392.41 1448.54 1426.09 1437.91 10.64 4.94 1.05 4.48

34 Kolhapur Food 657.69 679.26 670.63 664.84 1.66 2.28 1.53 1.34 Non-Food 932.12 581.54 721.77 650.57 6.53 5.18 4.20 4.15 Total 1589.80 1260.80 1392.40 1355.46 4.51 3.62 1.15 2.84

35 Sangli Food 591.84 741.40 681.58 739.49 2.45 0.22 0.86 0.22 Non-Food 1050.29 853.43 932.17 923.62 6.80 6.23 4.60 4.62 Total 1642.13 1594.83 1613.75 1607.33 5.24 3.23 1.00 2.75

Maharashtra Food 826.75 811.08 817.35 812.73 1.67 0.58 0.76 0.55 Non-Food 1405.23 1245.94 1309.65 1301.31 4.23 3.48 2.69 2.69 Total 2231.98 2057.02 2127.01 2109.23 3.26 2.31 0.89 1.89

Page 44: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

40

Table 6.6(R): District wise Estimate of MPCE (MRP) and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Rural (Schedule 1.0 Type-1)

District code District

Estimate of MPCE (MRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MRP)

Central State Pooling (MR)

Pooling (IV) Central State Pooling

(MR) Pooling (IV)

1 Nandurbar Food 419.39 352.84 386.12 383.07 4.09 4.43 3.01 3.02 Non-Food 344.19 359.02 351.61 351.58 3.01 2.90 2.09 2.09 Total 763.58 711.86 737.72 736.67 3.43 3.53 2.46 2.46

2 Dhule Food 506.36 380.12 443.24 400.64 3.33 1.95 2.08 1.70 Non-Food 386.83 430.52 408.68 418.00 6.62 3.77 3.71 3.28 Total 893.19 810.64 851.92 881.31 1.08 2.90 1.49 1.01

3 Jalgaon Food 542.94 441.78 492.36 457.08 2.85 1.48 1.70 1.32 Non-Food 487.60 419.47 453.54 421.42 6.66 1.33 3.63 1.30 Total 1030.54 861.25 945.90 871.54 4.57 1.39 2.57 1.33

4 Buldhana Food 468.74 413.79 441.27 451.73 1.72 2.90 1.64 1.48 Non-Food 489.64 379.21 434.42 438.80 6.40 8.94 5.31 5.24 Total 958.38 793.00 875.69 916.51 2.79 5.79 3.03 2.52

5 Akola Food 564.12 419.06 491.59 419.06 2.43 0.00 1.39 0.00 Non-Food 600.76 406.35 503.56 406.36 10.24 0.10 6.11 0.10 Total 1164.87 825.41 995.14 825.42 6.46 0.05 3.78 0.05

6 Washim Food 521.18 455.87 488.52 514.89 2.60 9.09 4.46 2.50 Non-Food 541.53 392.27 466.90 471.41 5.99 8.78 5.07 5.01 Total 1062.70 848.15 955.42 1005.15 4.32 8.95 4.64 3.91

7 Amravati Food 397.93 400.87 399.40 400.81 9.72 1.48 4.90 1.46 Non-Food 398.96 395.83 397.39 396.26 13.81 5.56 7.47 5.16 Total 796.89 796.70 796.79 796.72 11.76 3.50 6.14 3.35

8 Wardha Food 501.80 455.00 478.40 484.79 4.15 6.05 3.61 3.42 Non-Food 576.21 402.54 489.38 403.26 3.70 0.34 2.18 0.34 Total 1078.01 857.55 967.78 918.98 3.91 3.05 2.56 2.42

9 Nagpur Food 542.55 493.56 518.06 494.15 5.62 0.68 2.96 0.68 Non-Food 617.04 594.48 605.76 598.28 6.45 3.01 3.60 2.73 Total 1159.59 1088.04 1123.82 1142.09 1.04 1.94 1.08 0.92

Page 45: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

41

District code District

Estimate of MPCE (MRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MRP)

Central State Pooling (MR)

Pooling (IV) Central State Pooling

(MR) Pooling (IV)

10 Bhandara Food 408.05 496.67 452.36 452.05 4.00 3.31 2.56 2.56 Non-Food 385.52 513.52 449.52 419.57 5.74 7.16 4.78 4.52 Total 793.57 1010.18 901.88 867.90 4.85 5.27 3.64 3.59

11 Gondiya Food 388.92 454.12 421.52 420.52 1.45 1.28 0.96 0.96 Non-Food 403.60 427.61 415.60 405.02 1.06 4.00 2.12 1.03 Total 792.52 881.72 837.12 792.83 0.17 2.60 1.37 0.17

12 Gadchiroli Food 405.37 572.47 488.92 420.18 1.17 2.67 1.64 1.08 Non-Food 288.73 521.84 405.29 398.44 6.26 3.67 3.25 3.30 Total 694.10 1094.31 894.21 816.34 3.29 3.15 2.31 2.33

13 Chandrapur Food 489.88 496.15 493.02 495.03 8.17 3.76 4.48 3.42 Non-Food 402.17 462.27 432.22 461.93 13.46 0.89 6.28 0.88 Total 892.05 958.43 925.24 954.76 10.55 2.38 5.23 2.32

14 Yavatmal Food 434.47 406.23 420.35 430.40 1.90 4.96 2.59 1.78 Non-Food 412.32 341.39 376.86 407.80 1.34 6.19 2.90 1.31 Total 846.79 747.62 797.21 837.35 1.58 5.52 2.72 1.52

15 Nanded Food 422.47 514.54 468.51 457.53 3.25 3.40 2.38 2.36 Non-Food 384.56 480.75 432.66 407.69 4.79 6.81 4.34 3.94 Total 807.04 995.29 901.16 861.25 3.96 5.05 3.30 3.13

16 Hingoli Food 375.14 504.52 439.83 502.12 4.92 0.50 2.12 0.50 Non-Food 303.24 424.73 363.98 412.78 7.96 1.88 3.49 1.83 Total 678.38 929.25 803.81 925.22 6.28 0.58 2.67 0.58

17 Parbhani Food 430.56 517.64 474.10 460.04 0.73 0.85 0.57 0.56 Non-Food 358.04 518.86 438.45 503.12 2.11 0.48 0.91 0.47 Total 788.60 1036.50 912.55 1028.82 1.36 0.18 0.60 0.18

18 Jalna Food 516.79 554.20 535.50 539.57 6.01 4.49 3.71 3.60 Non-Food 538.44 593.98 566.21 563.19 8.34 8.43 5.94 5.94 Total 1055.23 1148.18 1101.71 1102.35 7.20 6.52 4.84 4.84

19 Aurangabad Food 587.44 558.15 572.80 576.11 2.92 3.87 2.41 2.33 Non-Food 653.76 463.36 558.56 533.44 4.02 4.33 2.96 2.99 Total 1241.20 1021.51 1131.35 1226.38 0.74 3.34 1.56 0.72

Page 46: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

42

District code District

Estimate of MPCE (MRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MRP)

Central State Pooling (MR)

Pooling (IV) Central State Pooling

(MR) Pooling (IV)

20 Nashik Food 557.88 476.49 517.18 485.47 2.01 0.83 1.15 0.77 Non-Food 586.28 494.58 540.43 530.29 4.28 4.06 2.97 2.96 Total 1144.16 971.07 1057.61 1020.80 3.18 2.38 2.03 1.91

21 Thane Food 514.50 557.05 535.77 535.13 2.83 2.69 1.95 1.95 Non-Food 529.30 553.66 541.48 529.74 1.23 8.64 4.46 1.22 Total 1043.80 1110.71 1077.26 1050.44 1.99 5.62 3.05 1.87

24 Raigad Food 640.55 626.12 633.34 626.76 6.55 1.45 3.39 1.41 Non-Food 748.50 648.25 698.37 656.85 14.19 5.02 7.95 4.74 Total 1389.05 1274.37 1331.71 1282.66 10.67 3.25 5.78 3.11

25 Pune Food 533.39 582.90 558.15 578.30 6.22 1.82 3.12 1.75 Non-Food 676.06 627.50 651.78 628.97 10.61 2.02 5.59 1.98 Total 1209.44 1210.41 1209.93 1210.40 8.67 0.42 4.34 0.42

26 Ahmednagar Food 557.97 483.20 520.58 484.52 2.85 0.44 1.54 0.44 Non-Food 560.34 542.70 551.52 544.37 4.15 1.39 2.22 1.32 Total 1118.30 1025.90 1072.10 1031.23 3.49 0.94 1.87 0.91

27 Bid Food 609.25 586.66 597.95 590.37 2.94 1.35 1.64 1.23 Non-Food 671.85 518.15 595.00 582.71 2.55 2.82 1.89 1.91 Total 1281.09 1104.81 1192.95 1278.85 0.06 0.60 0.28 0.06

28 Latur Food 488.91 581.71 535.31 523.80 4.20 4.55 3.13 3.10 Non-Food 544.25 641.58 592.91 550.30 3.02 9.94 5.56 2.89 Total 1033.16 1223.29 1128.22 1060.49 3.58 7.38 4.32 3.23

29 Osmanabad Food 539.06 481.74 510.40 504.43 2.03 1.84 1.38 1.36 Non-Food 523.57 372.01 447.79 399.19 0.79 0.52 0.51 0.44 Total 1062.64 853.75 958.19 924.53 1.42 1.26 0.97 0.95

30 Solapur Food 546.80 560.63 553.72 559.08 1.76 0.61 0.92 0.58 Non-Food 585.92 554.55 570.23 579.60 1.49 3.13 1.70 1.34 Total 1132.72 1115.18 1123.95 1125.26 1.57 1.86 1.22 1.20

31 Satara Food 544.27 612.82 578.55 545.48 0.47 3.12 1.67 0.47 Non-Food 570.62 728.86 649.74 722.03 5.66 0.94 2.54 0.93 Total 1114.89 1341.68 1228.29 1278.98 3.13 1.61 1.67 1.43

Page 47: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

43

District code District

Estimate of MPCE (MRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MRP)

Central State Pooling (MR)

Pooling (IV) Central State Pooling

(MR) Pooling (IV)

32 Ratnagiri Food 534.54 541.64 538.09 538.45 0.76 0.67 0.51 0.50 Non-Food 520.27 674.86 597.56 648.08 4.77 1.68 2.29 1.60 Total 1054.81 1216.50 1135.65 1181.10 2.50 1.15 1.31 1.04

33 Sindhudurg Food 519.94 582.93 551.43 520.65 0.45 3.77 2.00 0.45 Non-Food 533.94 681.24 607.59 659.87 6.50 2.10 3.09 2.00 Total 1053.88 1264.17 1159.03 1255.53 3.52 0.61 1.63 0.60

34 Kolhapur Food 553.32 610.85 582.08 578.01 1.24 1.30 0.90 0.90 Non-Food 579.16 509.63 544.40 529.09 3.75 2.66 2.35 2.17 Total 1132.48 1120.49 1126.48 1124.67 2.42 1.79 1.51 1.44

35 Sangli Food 572.96 614.34 593.65 587.05 2.19 2.84 1.81 1.73 Non-Food 808.89 575.53 692.21 585.31 14.12 4.15 8.43 3.99 Total 1381.85 1189.87 1285.86 1204.06 9.10 2.98 5.08 2.84

Maharashtra Food 515.16 514.43 514.79 514.67 0.72 0.51 0.44 0.41 Non-Food 533.25 510.66 521.96 517.07 1.39 0.92 0.84 0.77 Total 1048.41 1025.09 1036.75 1032.04 0.98 0.66 0.59 0.54

Page 48: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

44

Table 6.6(U): District wise Estimate of MPCE (MRP) and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Urban (Schedule 1.0 Type-1)

District code District Type

Estimate of MPCE (MRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MRP)

Central State Pooling (MR)

Pooling (IV) Central State Pooling

(MR) Pooling (IV)

1 Nandurbar Food 770.86 631.85 687.45 734.92 0.93 1.92 1.14 0.84 Non-Food 681.63 908.71 817.88 687.01 1.04 5.02 3.36 1.02 Total 1452.49 1540.56 1505.33 1452.49 0.01 3.75 2.30 0.01

2 Dhule Food 595.63 619.66 610.05 616.36 11.76 4.52 5.35 4.22 Non-Food 807.33 936.75 884.98 881.69 18.88 14.00 11.25 11.27 Total 1402.96 1556.41 1495.03 1504.47 15.85 10.22 8.73 8.60

3 Jalgaon Food 574.58 609.90 595.77 609.84 8.55 0.32 3.30 0.32 Non-Food 647.37 736.91 701.09 730.25 16.00 3.98 6.42 3.87 Total 1221.95 1346.81 1296.87 1341.77 12.49 2.33 4.93 2.29

4 Buldhana Food 613.03 524.61 559.98 526.59 3.01 0.53 1.35 0.52 Non-Food 720.79 710.83 714.81 720.69 1.17 12.23 7.31 1.17 Total 1333.82 1235.43 1274.79 1324.68 2.02 6.81 4.05 1.94

5 Akola Food 623.32 515.13 558.41 575.75 3.84 5.25 3.37 3.11 Non-Food 779.69 588.54 665.00 643.11 10.51 8.80 6.79 6.81 Total 1403.01 1103.67 1223.41 1210.41 7.55 7.15 5.19 5.23

6 Washim Food 514.04 447.51 474.12 461.12 5.06 2.95 2.76 2.55 Non-Food 453.58 484.94 472.39 474.78 9.74 6.30 5.39 5.29 Total 967.62 932.45 946.52 962.46 1.88 4.69 2.88 1.74

7 Amravati Food 499.90 575.36 545.18 563.69 7.90 2.94 3.44 2.76 Non-Food 749.21 1048.44 928.75 1046.18 22.23 1.39 7.23 1.39 Total 1249.11 1623.81 1473.93 1623.76 16.49 0.14 5.59 0.14

8 Wardha Food 678.58 646.04 659.06 647.72 4.56 1.11 1.99 1.08 Non-Food 890.64 1084.31 1006.84 1029.77 12.61 6.49 6.12 5.79 Total 1569.22 1730.35 1665.90 1704.14 9.13 3.65 4.12 3.39

9 Nagpur Food 714.07 681.65 694.62 693.40 2.37 1.87 1.47 1.47 Non-Food 1241.21 1107.08 1160.74 1162.89 6.20 5.87 4.28 4.27 Total 1955.29 1788.73 1855.35 1857.22 4.73 4.32 3.20 3.20

Page 49: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

45

District code District Type

Estimate of MPCE (MRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MRP)

Central State Pooling (MR)

Pooling (IV) Central State Pooling

(MR) Pooling (IV)

10 Bhandara Food 438.70 549.22 505.01 461.40 4.41 6.92 4.77 3.73 Non-Food 623.97 791.82 724.68 673.18 6.09 7.45 5.31 4.74 Total 1062.68 1341.04 1229.70 1072.61 1.76 7.23 4.77 1.71

11 Gondiya Food 580.21 681.68 641.09 608.85 2.58 3.50 2.42 2.08 Non-Food 735.69 1402.93 1136.03 764.13 5.95 14.80 11.07 5.61 Total 1315.91 2084.60 1777.12 1362.43 4.46 11.10 7.92 4.18

12 Gadchiroli Food 593.63 710.51 663.76 605.43 2.73 6.80 4.47 2.54 Non-Food 838.43 864.93 854.33 858.92 19.50 10.25 9.87 9.07 Total 1432.07 1575.44 1518.09 1522.77 12.55 8.69 7.19 7.15

13 Chandrapur Food 617.67 691.58 662.01 673.01 7.60 3.93 3.76 3.50 Non-Food 698.66 996.17 877.16 880.23 13.56 7.60 6.74 6.72 Total 1316.33 1687.74 1539.18 1559.49 10.76 6.10 5.44 5.34

14 Yavatmal Food 539.24 548.78 544.96 541.16 0.75 1.47 0.94 0.67 Non-Food 704.88 810.93 768.51 809.29 4.16 0.45 1.55 0.45 Total 1244.12 1359.71 1313.47 1356.33 2.03 0.32 0.80 0.32

15 Nanded Food 498.78 565.17 538.61 556.47 1.25 0.43 0.54 0.41 Non-Food 549.66 555.03 552.88 553.08 10.53 7.86 6.32 6.30 Total 1048.44 1120.19 1091.49 1099.25 6.12 3.68 3.26 3.15

16 Hingoli Food 564.34 510.75 532.19 512.63 4.12 0.87 1.82 0.85 Non-Food 714.27 462.14 562.99 468.20 15.14 3.67 7.89 3.58 Total 1278.60 972.90 1095.18 980.80 10.28 2.20 4.94 2.15

17 Parbhani Food 492.64 530.65 515.45 521.02 1.55 0.84 0.79 0.74 Non-Food 455.82 521.49 495.22 500.73 7.63 4.53 4.01 3.90 Total 948.46 1052.14 1010.67 998.48 2.86 2.67 1.98 1.95

18 Jalna Food 572.09 526.64 544.82 569.48 0.51 2.25 1.32 0.50 Non-Food 654.85 582.76 611.60 645.02 3.83 10.83 6.40 3.61 Total 1226.95 1109.40 1156.42 1212.55 2.28 6.75 4.01 2.16

19 Aurangabad Food 669.68 649.55 657.60 652.72 0.14 0.06 0.07 0.06 Non-Food 1042.84 1091.97 1072.32 1049.01 1.37 3.46 2.18 1.28 Total 1712.52 1741.52 1729.92 1715.82 0.78 2.15 1.33 0.73

Page 50: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

46

District code District Type

Estimate of MPCE (MRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MRP)

Central State Pooling (MR)

Pooling (IV) Central State Pooling

(MR) Pooling (IV)

20 Nashik Food 675.90 563.85 608.67 563.95 3.63 0.13 1.61 0.13 Non-Food 971.96 714.83 817.69 737.41 8.29 3.50 4.35 3.24 Total 1647.87 1278.68 1426.36 1298.60 6.38 1.96 3.13 1.88

21 Thane Food 970.06 852.88 899.75 854.50 1.94 0.26 0.85 0.26 Non-Food 1724.57 1485.76 1581.28 1510.46 4.66 1.84 2.28 1.71 Total 2694.63 2338.64 2481.04 2361.75 3.67 1.11 1.71 1.07

22 Mumbai Food 1030.95 1051.13 1043.06 1045.48 4.67 2.86 2.53 2.44 Non-Food 1929.53 1966.65 1951.80 1951.35 9.37 7.70 5.95 5.95 Total 2960.48 3017.78 2994.86 2995.67 7.73 6.01 4.75 4.75

24 Raigad Food 959.84 908.85 929.25 959.50 0.56 7.30 4.29 0.56 Non-Food 2026.46 1576.95 1756.75 2004.70 1.92 10.95 5.96 1.90 Total 2986.30 2485.80 2686.00 2969.66 1.48 9.62 5.38 1.47

25 Pune Food 877.98 806.36 835.01 817.90 2.99 1.42 1.50 1.29 Non-Food 1791.04 1337.15 1518.70 1375.93 7.35 3.01 3.81 2.80 Total 2669.02 2143.51 2353.71 2194.14 5.89 2.40 2.98 2.22

26 Ahmednagar Food 743.62 699.95 717.42 736.02 0.29 0.68 0.41 0.27 Non-Food 1009.71 889.26 937.44 901.51 8.01 3.06 3.87 2.86 Total 1753.33 1589.21 1654.86 1600.41 4.74 1.41 2.17 1.36

27 Bid Food 776.46 585.67 661.99 586.06 20.38 1.22 9.58 1.22 Non-Food 714.60 677.96 692.61 702.57 1.98 2.98 1.93 1.65 Total 1491.05 1263.63 1354.60 1264.93 11.56 1.04 5.12 1.03

28 Latur Food 456.06 600.06 542.46 456.99 0.33 3.11 2.07 0.33 Non-Food 623.46 759.31 704.97 659.55 3.57 4.88 3.39 2.89 Total 1079.52 1359.37 1247.43 1122.65 2.20 4.10 2.78 1.95

29 Osmanabad Food 596.49 430.69 497.01 436.29 1.63 0.42 0.82 0.41 Non-Food 528.41 421.00 463.97 526.40 0.78 7.08 3.87 0.77 Total 1124.90 851.69 960.97 1071.08 1.23 3.29 1.84 1.16

30 Solapur Food 576.77 591.78 585.78 591.49 2.07 0.28 0.83 0.28 Non-Food 849.92 716.05 769.60 734.24 8.93 4.20 4.59 3.81 Total 1426.69 1307.83 1355.37 1319.09 6.16 2.17 2.88 2.05

Page 51: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

47

District code District Type

Estimate of MPCE (MRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MRP)

Central State Pooling (MR)

Pooling (IV) Central State Pooling

(MR) Pooling (IV)

31 Satara Food 755.05 643.05 687.85 753.10 0.51 4.50 2.54 0.51 Non-Food 976.36 958.94 965.90 959.14 9.15 1.02 3.75 1.01 Total 1731.41 1601.98 1653.75 1608.19 4.94 1.20 2.18 1.16

32 Ratnagiri Food 701.87 866.11 800.42 738.49 2.92 4.42 3.05 2.45 Non-Food 909.41 1297.28 1142.13 1258.35 7.02 1.64 2.50 1.61 Total 1611.29 2163.40 1942.55 2141.96 5.24 0.78 1.81 0.78

33 Sindhudurg Food 683.18 757.09 727.52 757.07 6.12 0.07 2.30 0.07 Non-Food 858.27 1024.06 957.74 988.72 19.99 8.72 9.09 8.01 Total 1541.46 1781.14 1685.27 1745.04 13.84 5.05 5.99 4.75

34 Kolhapur Food 657.69 679.26 670.63 664.84 1.66 2.28 1.53 1.34 Non-Food 913.54 718.68 796.62 737.47 6.29 2.61 3.21 2.42 Total 1571.22 1397.94 1467.25 1432.69 4.35 2.45 2.33 2.14

35 Sangli Food 591.84 741.40 681.58 739.49 2.45 0.22 0.86 0.22 Non-Food 1046.97 818.15 909.68 850.31 15.27 7.90 8.22 7.05 Total 1638.81 1559.55 1591.26 1569.56 10.64 4.25 5.05 3.95

Maharashtra Food 826.75 811.08 817.35 812.73 1.67 0.58 0.76 0.55 Non-Food 1424.69 1347.13 1378.16 1369.24 3.67 2.45 2.09 2.04 Total 2251.44 2158.22 2195.51 2180.93 2.93 1.73 1.58 1.49

Page 52: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

48

Table 6.7(R): District wise Estimated no. of households and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Rural (Schedule 1.0 Type-2)

District Code District

Estimated no. of households RSE of estimated households

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

1 Nandurbar 243432 235960 239696 237560 7.54 4.06 8.64 7.152 Dhule 300289 283212 291751 290918 2.24 2.15 3.11 3.113 Jalgaon 644622 515060 579841 576615 5.47 6.51 8.39 8.434 Buldhana 404892 434719 419806 429145 1.54 0.69 1.64 1.255 Akola 208118 239657 223888 211290 1.14 2.95 3.33 2.126 Washim 195425 202189 198807 195902 1.08 3.80 4.01 2.087 Amravati 341244 409388 375316 401035 1.88 0.59 1.83 1.128 Wardha 192898 217169 205034 214386 4.82 1.54 4.82 2.949 Nagpur 303769 310751 307260 310739 5.22 0.22 5.17 0.43

10 Bhandara 223883 205366 214625 219305 1.99 3.78 4.17 3.5211 Gondiya 252060 236742 244401 239048 0.54 0.24 0.60 0.4412 Gadchiroli 211708 207812 209760 208737 3.14 1.79 3.63 3.1113 Chandrapur 456887 341839 399363 454022 0.50 4.18 3.62 0.9914 Yavatmal 479459 504659 492059 500003 2.01 0.91 2.17 1.6615 Nanded 377730 452382 415056 384281 1.48 3.99 4.56 2.7916 Hingoli 174199 198231 186215 174484 0.93 7.48 8.01 1.8517 Parbhani 220795 208950 214873 216769 3.01 4.44 5.31 4.9918 Jalna 312085 280786 296436 300160 2.09 2.97 3.57 3.4319 Aurangabad 483792 325482 404637 342549 4.04 2.09 5.12 3.7520 Nashik 492691 604438 548565 562850 3.40 2.13 3.85 3.6321 Thane 505531 616635 561083 521149 1.36 2.75 3.26 2.4424 Raigad 361708 436697 399203 378523 1.11 1.71 2.13 1.8725 Pune 665888 654224 660056 657952 2.10 1.47 2.57 2.4026 Ahmednagar 734372 668775 701574 701056 0.46 0.50 0.67 0.6727 Bid 441635 411014 426325 414614 3.10 1.22 3.42 2.2728 Latur 334835 365862 350349 339751 0.83 1.75 1.99 1.5029 Osmanabad 271854 270669 271262 271750 0.91 2.94 3.08 1.7430 Solapur 565709 568969 567339 566359 1.03 2.06 2.31 1.8531 Satara 547633 524040 535837 546802 0.49 2.68 2.67 0.9632 Ratnagiri 352996 350562 351779 350823 1.83 0.64 1.94 1.2133 Sindhudurg 175413 175425 175419 175413 0.53 4.08 4.11 1.0634 Kolhapur 528442 574805 551624 529979 0.33 1.63 1.72 0.6435 Sangli 420151 459341 439746 447787 1.21 0.72 1.38 1.24

Maharashtra 12426147 12491809 12458978 12458616 0.48 0.48 0.68 0.68

Page 53: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

49

Table 6.7(U): District wise estimated no. of households and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Urban (Schedule 1.0 Type-2)

District Code District

Estimated no. of households RSE of estimated households

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

1 Nandurbar 45824 25551 33660 25574 12.27 0.75 0.38 1.492 Dhule 79794 75914 77466 75945 13.53 1.28 0.26 2.543 Jalgaon 193785 157658 172109 165647 9.35 6.12 0.17 10.294 Buldhana 86327 83867 84851 83870 9.44 0.33 0.25 0.665 Akola 73547 129718 107250 83006 7.24 9.12 0.23 11.706 Washim 23664 36958 31640 30936 7.18 4.19 0.41 7.407 Amravati 194019 165926 177163 170242 9.04 4.50 0.17 8.088 Wardha 63373 61335 62150 61756 4.82 2.54 0.29 4.509 Nagpur 615050 536189 567733 587321 0.87 1.36 0.10 1.47

10 Bhandara 40449 23283 30149 38081 1.20 5.22 0.40 2.3711 Gondiya 48399 27923 36113 36173 1.58 2.25 0.37 2.6912 Gadchiroli 25166 14777 18933 14974 5.49 1.30 0.51 2.5413 Chandrapur 146991 138192 141712 140235 10.65 6.23 0.19 10.7614 Yavatmal 102729 118964 112470 114809 6.59 3.34 0.22 5.9715 Nanded 153984 102229 122931 110001 8.44 5.34 0.20 9.1516 Hingoli 37188 36281 36644 36984 9.50 18.04 0.38 16.8117 Parbhani 77147 70219 72990 70350 4.37 0.67 0.27 1.3218 Jalna 35446 98170 73080 35903 4.01 16.90 0.28 7.8919 Aurangabad 308445 234304 263960 237193 12.58 3.33 0.14 6.4620 Nashik 312454 332023 324195 328450 3.83 1.70 0.13 3.1121 Thane 1877616 1761893 1808182 1798383 3.37 2.44 0.05 3.9522 Mumbai 2704835 3073007 2925738 2713369 1.74 9.91 0.04 3.4224 Raigad 200809 171284 183094 178484 13.51 8.99 0.17 15.0125 Pune 1211471 1375574 1309933 1305769 3.51 2.66 0.06 4.2526 Ahmednagar 170264 197360 186522 171928 4.48 15.09 0.17 8.5927 Bid 59002 84609 74366 75065 10.15 5.46 0.27 9.7428 Latur 81675 131346 111478 111428 6.11 3.11 0.22 5.6729 Osmanabad 35091 40996 38634 40531 9.19 2.30 0.37 4.4630 Solapur 255333 223264 236092 227536 7.56 3.39 0.15 6.2031 Satara 119033 95523 104927 98331 31.92 14.65 0.22 26.7032 Ratnagiri 34965 67264 54344 44035 25.48 21.20 0.32 34.3233 Sindhudurg 19415 13448 15835 18196 3.16 8.99 0.56 6.0134 Kolhapur 169974 238820 211282 238780 8.34 0.14 0.16 0.2835 Sangli 124596 136857 131953 133668 9.39 5.07 0.20 8.93

Maharashtra 9727857 10080724 9939577 9772209 1.22 3.11 0.02 2.28

Page 54: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

50

Table 6.8 (R): District wise estimated number of persons and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Rural (Schedule 1.0 Type-2)

District Code District

Estimated no.of persons (00) RSE of Estimated persons

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

1 Nandurbar 10147 11790 10969 11456 6.93 3.01 7.18 5.532 Dhule 12267 12586 12426 12365 2.11 3.1 3.77 3.493 Jalgaon 24952 21054 23003 24676 1.09 4.68 4.44 2.124 Buldhana 17668 20339 19003 20279 6.2 0.82 5.83 1.625 Akola 10636 9085 9860 9085 2.9 0.06 3.13 0.126 Washim 8363 9822 9093 8798 4.46 5.83 7.52 7.117 Amravati 16334 19104 17719 18890 7.17 1.77 6.88 3.448 Wardha 6621 8179 7400 6861 3.44 6.52 7.83 6.19 Nagpur 14297 11598 12948 12442 6.56 5.45 8.74 8.43

10 Bhandara 9722 7580 8651 9248 2.02 4.87 4.83 3.7511 Gondiya 11520 9693 10606 9730 3.08 0.53 3.38 1.0412 Gadchiroli 9209 8072 8641 8192 4.33 1.7 4.88 3.1613 Chandrapur 19123 15245 17184 16173 13.24 9.31 16.89 15.3114 Yavatmal 19148 20505 19826 19256 0.77 2.44 2.63 1.4715 Nanded 17790 21485 19638 18348 2.23 4.39 5.21 3.9916 Hingoli 8311 9087 8699 8489 5.88 9.87 11.74 10.1117 Parbhani 10112 12345 11228 12064 7.92 2.46 7.63 4.7118 Jalna 14267 15614 14941 14280 1.12 10.32 10.84 2.2419 Aurangabad 25666 15221 20444 21591 4.32 9.12 8.69 8.0320 Nashik 23485 32473 27979 29476 2.81 1.44 2.89 2.5921 Thane 23917 26768 25343 25212 1.22 1.2 1.71 1.7124 Raigad 14048 18888 16468 17662 2.55 1.11 2.52 2.0425 Pune 30820 27564 29192 28959 3.42 3.31 4.78 4.7726 Ahmednagar 33524 33156 33340 33170 1.86 0.38 1.9 0.7427 Bid 21373 19459 20416 20109 2.7 2.13 3.48 3.3528 Latur 16468 17287 16877 16584 1.79 4.2 4.64 3.2929 Osmanabad 13195 11327 12261 13147 0.85 6.11 5.72 1.6930 Solapur 24464 26478 25471 26384 2.43 0.5 2.39 0.9831 Satara 21734 25451 23593 23888 1.35 0.98 1.64 1.632 Ratnagiri 13558 15211 14384 14825 6.33 3.12 6.82 5.633 Sindhudurg 7641 7409 7525 7409 1.49 0.03 1.52 0.0734 Kolhapur 24104 25176 24640 24227 1.27 3.39 3.68 2.3935 Sangli 19899 19456 19677 19607 7.17 5.27 8.93 8.5

Maharashtra 554385 564507 559446 559985 0.79 0.7 1.06 1.05

Page 55: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

51

Table 6.8 (U): District wise estimated number of persons and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Urban (Schedule 1.0 Type-2)

District Code District

Estimated no.of persons (00) RSE of Estimated persons

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

1 Nandurbar 2652 1276 1826 1276 12.68 0.33 0.16 0.652 Dhule 3657 3791 3737 3791 17.27 1.00 0.12 2.003 Jalgaon 10824 7637 8912 7911 11.73 5.11 0.08 9.424 Buldhana 4385 4860 4670 4825 4.62 1.17 0.11 2.275 Akola 3734 6128 5171 4036 8.88 14.25 0.10 15.366 Washim 1260 2035 1725 1444 7.73 8.58 0.18 11.787 Amravati 8435 7381 7803 7524 7.45 3.37 0.08 6.158 Wardha 2321 2494 2425 2467 2.89 1.15 0.15 2.149 Nagpur 25556 21808 23307 22406 3.6 1.84 0.05 3.28

10 Bhandara 1627 995 1248 1309 3.74 6.07 0.20 6.5511 Gondiya 2126 1055 1483 1619 2.62 5.56 0.18 4.9912 Gadchiroli 988 703 817 829 3.82 4.8 0.25 6.0713 Chandrapur 6342 5297 5715 5357 11.91 3.52 0.09 6.7714 Yavatmal 4967 5133 5067 5111 9.44 3.62 0.10 6.7615 Nanded 8672 6190 7183 6519 11.09 6.08 0.08 10.7516 Hingoli 1787 2155 2007 1851 11.76 21.2 0.16 20.6317 Parbhani 4638 3852 4166 3909 8.07 2.72 0.11 5.1518 Jalna 1803 4389 3354 1815 1.84 11.06 0.13 3.6519 Aurangabad 15158 9523 11777 9597 8.53 1.56 0.06 3.0720 Nashik 14680 14994 14869 14796 2.78 3.57 0.06 4.3921 Thane 70309 73972 72507 72226 2.65 2.4 0.03 3.5622 Mumbai 109632 120265 116012 110025 1.37 6.38 0.02 2.6824 Raigad 7534 6608 6978 6853 7.11 4.87 0.09 8.0525 Pune 43767 54106 49970 46030 2.12 3.24 0.03 3.5626 Ahmednagar 7068 7928 7584 7175 5.18 12.21 0.08 9.5527 Bid 2909 4146 3651 4145 7.77 0.16 0.12 0.3128 Latur 3755 6077 5148 5833 2.56 0.54 0.10 1.0729 Osmanabad 1731 2287 2064 2146 2.79 1.23 0.16 2.2730 Solapur 12157 10128 10940 10322 3.23 1.26 0.07 2.3531 Satara 4239 4395 4333 4331 25.58 20.51 0.11 32.0132 Ratnagiri 1483 3007 2398 1785 26.53 26.29 0.15 39.4533 Sindhudurg 710 463 562 708 0.43 7.18 0.3 0.8634 Kolhapur 8842 9850 9447 9608 10.26 5.18 0.07 9.2635 Sangli 6320 6096 6186 6318 0.57 7.21 0.09 1.13

Maharashtra 406068 421023 415041 408937 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.79

Page 56: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

52

Table 6.9 (R): District wise estimated sex ratio and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Rural (Schedule 1.0 Type-2)

District Code District

Sex Ratio RSE of Sex Ratio

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

1 Nandurbar 914 930 922 928 7.42 2.5 3.89 2.372 Dhule 976 1017 996 1006 3.8 2.22 2.18 1.923 Jalgaon 927 1045 986 927 0.17 3.56 1.89 0.154 Buldhana 838 892 865 882 8.73 3.86 4.67 3.535 Akola 874 843 858 856 5.82 5.24 3.93 3.96 Washim 802 1350 1076 930 5.7 6.13 4.39 4.37 Amravati 909 965 937 961 5.72 1.6 2.9 1.548 Wardha 1205 866 1036 945 6.17 4.71 4.09 3.799 Nagpur 910 949 929 938 5.29 3.22 3.07 2.7510 Bhandara 933 1039 986 953 2.91 5.39 3.16 2.5611 Gondiya 867 922 894 905 4.67 2.93 2.72 2.4812 Gadchiroli 1267 785 1026 933 7.61 8.19 5.65 5.7313 Chandrapur 1178 924 1051 1101 6.08 11.74 6.18 5.4314 Yavatmal 867 925 896 910 3.51 1.92 1.97 1.6815 Nanded 1008 1071 1039 1040 2.64 2.41 1.79 1.7816 Hingoli 849 1020 934 866 4.88 12.1 6.97 4.5417 Parbhani 1022 910 966 910 14.58 0.32 7.71 0.3118 Jalna 936 986 961 943 4.48 10.4 5.77 4.1119 Aurangabad 852 882 867 854 2.88 10.42 5.49 2.7720 Nashik 939 995 967 952 1.29 2.17 1.28 1.1121 Thane 961 1041 1001 967 0.84 2.72 1.47 0.824 Raigad 1219 847 1033 916 3.14 2.15 2.05 1.825 Pune 922 891 907 893 5.07 1.09 2.63 1.0726 Ahmednagar 1061 879 970 886 1.56 0.37 0.87 0.3727 Bid 943 905 924 910 2.92 1.24 1.61 1.1528 Latur 1099 919 1009 1074 1.04 3.1 1.52 0.9929 Osmanabad 886 936 911 888 1.85 8.34 4.38 1.830 Solapur 925 969 947 933 1.37 2.78 1.57 1.2331 Satara 933 930 932 931 1.26 0.66 0.71 0.5932 Ratnagiri 1338 938 1138 986 8.31 4.38 5.21 3.9133 Sindhudurg 1033 960 997 972 2.83 1.29 1.59 1.1834 Kolhapur 952 967 960 952 0.34 3.93 1.99 0.3535 Sangli 1126 885 1006 945 7.19 5.27 4.65 4.27

Maharashtra 971 947 959 958 0.77 0.76 0.54 0.54

Page 57: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

53

Table 6.9 (U): District wise estimated sex ratio and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Urban (Schedule 1.0 Type-2)

District Code District

Sex Ratio RSE of Sex Ratio

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV)

1 Nandurbar 1091 879 964 896 6.69 2.4 2.3 2.272 Dhule 953 893 917 899 16.95 5.55 2.37 5.283 Jalgaon 798 843 825 832 12.93 7.11 2.52 6.234 Buldhana 1074 874 954 1037 0.57 1.47 2.31 0.535 Akola 934 750 824 866 10.05 16.42 2.49 8.626 Washim 983 927 950 946 10.8 8.08 2.33 6.477 Amravati 949 873 904 901 6.75 5.64 2.39 4.338 Wardha 1218 898 1026 1015 2.17 2.24 2.22 1.579 Nagpur 918 982 956 967 5.04 2.58 2.34 2.3

10 Bhandara 1039 1002 1017 1034 3.22 8.76 2.26 3.0211 Gondiya 1200 847 988 1194 0.5 5.63 2.26 0.512 Gadchiroli 950 880 908 928 3.65 5.76 2.38 3.0813 Chandrapur 903 889 894 891 13.98 5.55 2.41 5.1614 Yavatmal 986 914 943 933 6.48 4.19 2.34 3.5215 Nanded 1004 1004 1004 1004 10.08 3.68 2.28 3.4516 Hingoli 829 1017 942 872 11.32 16.83 2.37 9.4317 Parbhani 1051 819 912 822 12.64 1.88 2.36 1.8618 Jalna 910 806 847 908 1.51 14.96 2.46 1.519 Aurangabad 811 806 808 807 10.13 3.38 2.54 3.220 Nashik 989 866 915 916 2.88 2.73 2.37 1.9821 Thane 842 878 864 863 2.96 2.4 2.46 1.8722 Mumbai 870 776 813 868 0.79 7.64 2.52 0.7824 Raigad 938 917 925 920 7.67 3.59 2.37 3.2525 Pune 848 947 907 900 2.88 2.44 2.41 1.8626 Ahmednagar 902 813 849 883 5.59 11.87 2.46 5.0627 Bid 986 883 924 884 13.24 1.5 2.36 1.4928 Latur 898 902 900 902 5.15 0.94 2.4 0.9229 Osmanabad 920 989 961 943 2.89 3.75 2.33 2.2930 Solapur 1102 933 1000 945 3.21 1.04 2.26 0.9931 Satara 972 976 975 975 24.21 16.74 2.31 13.7732 Ratnagiri 1126 974 1035 1046 24.06 26.33 2.23 17.8133 Sindhudurg 1022 1204 1131 1085 7.56 8.79 2.16 5.7534 Kolhapur 856 967 923 932 11.23 6.81 2.39 5.8335 Sangli 793 781 786 792 1.32 8.21 2.57 1.31

Maharashtra 892 862 874 887 1.08 2.42 2.44 0.98

Page 58: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

54

Table 6.10(R): District wise Estimate of MPCE (MMRP) and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Rural (Schedule 1.0 Type-2)

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (MMRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MMRP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

1 Nandurbar Food 232.81 353.27 293.04 254.40 5.31 7.49 4.98 4.40 Non-Food 305.31 299.46 302.38 305.28 0.44 6.95 3.45 0.44 Total 538.11 652.73 595.42 546.12 2.40 7.22 4.10 2.28

2 Dhule Food 280.11 477.73 378.92 283.91 1.84 7.72 4.91 1.80 Non-Food 442.29 429.84 436.06 440.99 2.98 8.96 4.67 2.82 Total 722.39 907.57 814.98 731.60 2.39 8.31 4.74 2.30

3 Jalgaon Food 292.58 533.48 413.03 517.99 3.19 0.46 1.17 0.46 Non-Food 482.93 432.40 457.66 439.61 4.41 2.01 2.51 1.83 Total 775.51 965.88 870.70 884.91 1.59 1.10 0.93 0.91

4 Buldhana Food 248.69 508.61 378.65 464.77 1.14 0.25 0.41 0.25 Non-Food 448.24 470.12 459.18 463.76 5.09 3.11 2.95 2.65 Total 696.93 978.73 837.83 877.51 2.86 1.53 1.49 1.36

5 Akola Food 286.38 579.39 432.88 573.88 8.51 0.58 2.84 0.58 Non-Food 499.03 572.70 535.87 572.12 11.10 0.86 5.19 0.86 Total 785.41 1152.09 968.75 1151.95 10.15 0.14 4.12 0.14

6 Washim Food 291.15 503.63 397.39 496.53 6.93 0.74 2.58 0.74 Non-Food 459.32 372.22 415.77 406.40 5.98 5.94 4.24 4.24 Total 750.47 875.85 813.16 859.67 6.35 2.09 3.14 1.99

7 Amravati Food 218.55 541.31 379.93 506.98 8.24 1.15 2.51 1.16 Non-Food 388.22 397.83 393.02 397.35 15.84 3.53 8.03 3.45 Total 606.77 939.14 772.95 919.19 13.10 2.14 5.31 2.12

8 Wardha Food 281.79 542.69 412.24 391.70 10.33 6.29 5.44 5.65 Non-Food 594.76 428.49 511.63 433.95 4.69 1.20 2.77 1.16 Total 876.55 971.18 923.86 940.74 6.50 4.04 3.75 3.44

9 Nagpur Food 323.01 597.04 460.03 324.65 0.92 6.44 4.19 0.92 Non-Food 665.00 436.32 550.66 623.62 3.40 11.03 4.83 3.28 Total 988.00 1033.37 1010.69 990.27 2.01 8.38 4.39 1.95

Page 59: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

55

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (MMRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MMRP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

10 Bhandara Food 223.90 777.70 500.80 231.73 0.72 1.72 1.35 0.69 Non-Food 378.00 584.85 481.42 381.68 1.85 8.86 5.43 1.81 Total 601.90 1362.55 982.22 607.04 0.89 4.79 3.33 0.88

11 Gondiya Food 225.27 576.49 400.88 558.94 8.59 0.77 2.48 0.77 Non-Food 345.73 480.72 413.23 446.98 3.61 1.50 1.74 1.40 Total 571.00 1057.21 814.10 999.84 5.57 1.10 2.08 1.09

12 Gadchiroli Food 204.66 696.05 450.36 426.63 2.27 0.73 0.77 0.80 Non-Food 358.03 540.70 449.36 538.00 8.55 0.69 3.43 0.69 Total 562.68 1236.75 899.72 1235.74 6.26 0.11 1.96 0.11

13 Chandrapur Food 188.97 641.65 415.31 195.21 0.73 1.82 1.42 0.70 Non-Food 291.88 488.08 389.98 455.98 4.73 1.25 1.93 1.22 Total 480.85 1129.73 805.29 722.42 2.85 1.57 1.39 1.50

14 Yavatmal Food 253.01 525.09 389.05 333.45 1.62 1.20 0.97 1.03 Non-Food 412.78 365.09 388.93 374.83 1.62 0.93 0.97 0.81 Total 665.79 890.18 777.99 872.12 1.61 0.36 0.72 0.35

15 Nanded Food 267.88 588.26 428.07 551.04 5.22 0.86 1.74 0.87 Non-Food 355.68 512.24 433.96 384.86 3.92 5.69 3.72 3.27 Total 623.55 1100.50 862.03 820.30 4.22 2.86 2.38 2.46

16 Hingoli Food 267.40 648.55 457.98 624.16 15.88 1.71 4.79 1.72 Non-Food 343.95 459.65 401.80 433.53 15.31 6.19 7.45 5.77 Total 611.35 1108.21 859.78 1092.23 15.56 1.56 5.62 1.56

17 Parbhani Food 283.69 543.91 413.80 503.64 8.20 1.83 3.06 1.82 Non-Food 345.15 452.60 398.88 352.78 3.81 10.52 6.19 3.59 Total 628.85 996.52 812.68 733.91 5.79 5.78 4.19 4.19

18 Jalna Food 307.60 558.10 432.85 338.82 1.19 1.74 1.20 1.01 Non-Food 502.75 367.02 434.88 422.02 1.56 1.77 1.17 1.19 Total 810.34 925.12 867.73 818.51 0.52 1.66 0.92 0.50

19 Aurangabad Food 278.13 672.38 475.25 285.47 1.98 5.94 4.24 1.91 Non-Food 610.50 452.72 531.61 456.70 7.49 1.62 4.35 1.59 Total 888.62 1125.10 1006.86 1019.70 5.76 4.08 3.41 3.35

Page 60: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

56

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (MMRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MMRP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

20 Nashik Food 303.29 536.08 419.69 528.60 6.03 0.62 2.21 0.62 Non-Food 642.34 453.37 547.85 505.25 11.50 10.02 7.91 7.66 Total 945.63 989.45 967.54 979.86 9.74 4.93 5.38 4.40

21 Thane Food 217.88 724.83 471.36 331.85 3.58 2.00 1.74 2.07 Non-Food 416.07 640.17 528.12 441.99 3.63 6.52 4.20 3.21 Total 633.95 1365.01 999.48 646.25 1.16 4.10 2.83 1.12

24 Raigad Food 279.49 762.89 521.19 579.93 5.51 1.58 1.87 1.63 Non-Food 664.52 589.25 626.88 603.91 13.31 7.38 7.86 6.46 Total 944.02 1352.13 1148.07 1262.11 11.00 4.09 5.12 3.86

25 Pune Food 332.81 722.58 527.70 338.31 0.57 2.20 1.52 0.56 Non-Food 569.57 641.33 605.45 586.53 3.73 5.95 3.61 3.17 Total 902.38 1363.91 1133.14 973.63 2.56 3.96 2.59 2.18

26 Ahmednagar Food 300.92 607.52 454.22 573.97 1.36 0.24 0.48 0.24 Non-Food 555.92 560.23 558.07 559.23 1.50 0.82 0.85 0.72 Total 856.85 1167.75 1012.30 1143.51 1.44 0.31 0.63 0.30

27 Bid Food 273.89 789.64 531.77 366.86 6.75 4.99 4.09 4.56 Non-Food 498.45 543.36 520.91 519.80 7.30 7.03 5.06 5.07 Total 772.35 1333.01 1052.68 800.64 2.32 5.82 3.78 2.18

28 Latur Food 303.98 741.43 522.71 305.83 0.09 0.56 0.40 0.09 Non-Food 602.76 619.01 610.88 618.90 4.27 0.34 2.12 0.34 Total 906.74 1360.44 1133.59 1335.41 2.87 0.46 1.18 0.46

29 Osmanabad Food 313.87 631.78 472.83 563.63 6.95 1.80 2.60 1.79 Non-Food 611.84 450.24 531.04 450.83 15.43 1.27 8.91 1.27 Total 925.72 1082.01 1003.87 1078.69 12.56 1.58 5.85 1.57

30 Solapur Food 309.35 626.46 467.90 408.73 4.02 2.94 2.38 2.52 Non-Food 604.26 493.25 548.76 555.87 4.37 6.10 3.65 3.57 Total 913.61 1119.71 1016.66 995.22 4.21 4.24 3.00 3.00

31 Satara Food 302.59 743.38 522.99 317.17 0.79 1.73 1.25 0.74 Non-Food 543.50 667.52 605.51 599.26 3.04 2.74 2.04 2.05 Total 846.09 1410.90 1128.50 1308.90 2.15 0.60 0.89 0.59

Page 61: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

57

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (MMRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MMRP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

32 Ratnagiri Food 288.88 574.98 431.93 317.89 1.77 2.65 1.86 1.52 Non-Food 427.61 586.68 507.15 431.35 2.26 10.63 6.22 2.22 Total 713.85 1161.67 937.76 726.57 1.86 6.68 4.20 1.80

33 Sindhudurg Food 313.54 639.85 476.70 606.46 3.76 0.62 1.31 0.62 Non-Food 499.63 679.31 589.47 596.86 10.25 6.94 5.91 5.81 Total 813.17 1319.16 1066.17 1157.46 7.75 3.27 3.58 3.08

34 Kolhapur Food 326.15 746.53 536.34 346.11 0.75 1.47 1.05 0.69 Non-Food 494.33 663.16 578.75 572.02 4.98 4.02 3.13 3.16 Total 820.47 1409.34 1114.91 1240.97 3.29 1.21 1.43 1.16

35 Sangli Food 333.74 715.34 524.54 345.32 0.70 1.83 1.27 0.66 Non-Food 750.21 508.45 629.33 509.43 16.57 1.56 9.90 1.56 Total 1083.95 1223.79 1153.87 1220.32 11.62 1.64 5.53 1.63

Maharashtra Food 281.56 626.81 454.19 403.82 0.75 0.45 0.39 0.42 Non-Food 504.45 514.81 509.63 511.12 1.52 1.11 0.94 0.89 Total 786.00 1141.62 963.81 989.48 1.13 0.67 0.61 0.59

Page 62: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

58

Table 6.10(U): District wise Estimate of MPCE (MMRP) and their RSE's for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Urban (Schedule 1.0 Type-2)

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (MMRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MMRP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

1 Nandurbar Food 506.46 698.72 621.82 692.89 9.31 1.19 3.14 1.18 Non-Food 909.33 1019.80 975.61 961.31 10.13 9.58 7.10 6.97 Total 1415.80 1718.52 1597.43 1607.42 9.83 6.17 5.29 5.25

2 Dhule Food 326.52 724.08 565.06 529.78 11.05 4.87 4.53 4.76 Non-Food 893.06 998.96 956.60 946.95 16.89 14.83 11.23 11.16 Total 1219.58 1723.04 1521.65 1476.03 15.33 10.65 8.74 8.87

3 Jalgaon Food 343.28 731.46 576.19 398.03 5.13 5.94 4.68 4.10 Non-Food 569.84 779.28 695.51 767.22 17.64 3.19 6.17 3.15 Total 913.12 1510.74 1271.69 1361.06 12.94 4.52 4.92 4.34

4 Buldhana Food 319.01 573.83 471.90 383.88 1.53 1.46 1.14 1.10 Non-Food 624.48 630.73 628.23 628.22 5.65 4.58 3.56 3.56 Total 943.49 1204.56 1100.13 1122.78 3.22 1.71 1.57 1.52

5 Akola Food 295.28 574.87 463.03 338.60 2.63 3.16 2.45 2.11 Non-Food 563.97 620.77 598.05 599.19 12.30 8.74 7.15 7.13 Total 859.25 1195.64 1061.09 1038.00 8.97 6.06 5.02 5.09

6 Washim Food 287.27 603.74 477.15 317.58 4.20 6.14 4.77 3.61 Non-Food 507.15 568.99 544.26 544.85 7.48 5.33 4.36 4.35 Total 794.41 1172.73 1021.41 842.95 3.26 5.75 4.09 2.87

7 Amravati Food 243.89 728.86 534.87 266.37 2.26 3.42 2.83 2.02 Non-Food 643.19 939.06 820.71 931.92 11.67 1.26 3.76 1.25 Total 887.08 1667.92 1355.58 1533.44 9.09 2.20 2.88 2.18

8 Wardha Food 369.42 790.57 622.11 721.60 8.49 1.75 2.42 1.76 Non-Food 867.52 1022.35 960.42 945.10 14.27 12.09 9.28 9.25 Total 1236.94 1812.92 1582.53 1559.73 12.54 7.58 6.52 6.60

9 Nagpur Food 399.77 913.95 708.27 528.39 1.70 1.29 1.07 1.11 Non-Food 1237.02 1111.50 1161.70 1117.49 6.73 1.68 3.02 1.63 Total 1636.78 2025.44 1869.98 1985.90 5.50 1.49 2.16 1.44

Page 63: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

59

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (MMRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MMRP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

10 Bhandara Food 237.08 838.24 597.78 240.66 1.73 6.31 5.32 1.70 Non-Food 546.71 666.39 618.52 561.40 2.92 6.41 4.27 2.67 Total 783.79 1504.64 1216.30 814.22 2.56 6.36 4.77 2.41

11 Gondiya Food 263.65 836.22 607.19 280.42 4.55 8.25 6.86 4.21 Non-Food 599.92 1424.41 1094.62 634.11 8.49 17.19 13.55 7.86 Total 863.58 2260.63 1701.81 917.54 7.29 13.89 11.17 6.72

12 Gadchiroli Food 266.17 862.54 623.99 266.56 0.64 7.69 6.38 0.64 Non-Food 631.82 812.86 740.45 667.17 9.56 15.08 10.45 8.12 Total 897.98 1675.40 1364.44 973.74 6.91 11.28 8.51 6.06

13 Chandrapur Food 342.42 901.23 677.71 437.45 6.11 5.13 4.27 4.36 Non-Food 686.59 1255.14 1027.72 937.99 10.74 6.60 5.63 5.87 Total 1029.01 2156.37 1705.43 1423.47 9.20 5.99 5.05 5.36

14 Yavatmal Food 296.21 663.77 516.75 498.56 3.87 1.56 1.50 1.54 Non-Food 631.57 761.90 709.77 761.89 6.69 0.05 2.38 0.05 Total 927.79 1425.68 1226.52 1406.57 5.79 0.75 1.83 0.75

15 Nanded Food 303.04 713.66 549.41 693.15 7.41 0.72 1.73 0.72 Non-Food 534.31 550.37 543.94 534.70 1.58 9.65 5.89 1.55 Total 837.34 1264.03 1093.36 871.00 1.68 3.79 2.68 1.55

16 Hingoli Food 323.32 634.16 509.83 513.85 5.03 2.04 1.99 1.97 Non-Food 658.76 504.63 566.28 629.37 5.89 15.83 8.90 5.54 Total 982.08 1138.79 1076.11 990.78 2.29 8.15 5.24 2.21

17 Parbhani Food 308.73 686.97 535.67 686.01 1.90 0.04 0.44 0.04 Non-Food 408.30 541.61 488.29 502.47 4.12 2.00 1.92 1.81 Total 717.03 1228.58 1023.96 1137.55 3.16 0.86 1.08 0.84

18 Jalna Food 342.13 743.26 582.81 382.54 1.31 1.80 1.41 1.11 Non-Food 633.58 713.82 681.73 637.67 1.63 6.24 3.97 1.58 Total 975.72 1457.08 1264.54 992.04 0.60 2.14 1.49 0.58

19 Aurangabad Food 330.30 940.81 696.60 360.23 2.31 3.57 2.93 2.07 Non-Food 1088.88 1082.20 1084.87 1083.43 10.77 5.13 5.30 4.63 Total 1419.18 2023.01 1781.48 1819.11 8.80 4.41 4.11 3.99

Page 64: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

60

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (MMRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MMRP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

20 Nashik Food 362.00 714.71 573.63 684.86 2.83 0.44 0.79 0.44 Non-Food 944.15 727.29 814.03 737.90 7.01 2.06 3.43 1.98 Total 1306.15 1442.00 1387.66 1438.27 5.83 0.89 2.26 0.88

21 Thane Food 446.98 1054.72 811.62 497.90 0.74 1.04 0.83 0.64 Non-Food 1722.60 1462.97 1566.82 1540.47 4.22 3.24 2.60 2.58 Total 2169.58 2517.70 2378.45 2383.21 3.28 2.24 1.86 1.85

22 Mumbai Food 433.38 1261.27 930.12 609.85 2.83 1.87 1.61 1.78 Non-Food 1839.60 1723.29 1769.82 1766.76 11.54 9.52 7.35 7.35 Total 2272.99 2981.39 2698.03 2688.35 9.88 6.33 5.36 5.37

24 Raigad Food 447.97 1104.70 842.01 448.84 0.90 10.02 7.89 0.90 Non-Food 1940.53 1779.00 1843.61 1896.03 8.26 14.61 9.15 7.19 Total 2388.49 2883.70 2685.62 2469.84 6.88 12.85 8.63 6.08

25 Pune Food 428.42 980.37 759.59 807.76 1.54 0.45 0.49 0.46 Non-Food 1747.96 1320.25 1491.34 1337.02 4.70 1.26 2.30 1.22 Total 2176.38 2300.62 2250.93 2295.65 4.00 0.77 1.62 0.76

26 Ahmednagar Food 371.45 906.94 692.75 372.89 0.86 6.82 5.36 0.86 Non-Food 887.89 1139.83 1039.06 910.21 5.17 12.91 8.68 4.81 Total 1259.35 2046.78 1731.81 1290.84 3.39 10.21 7.31 3.24

27 Bid Food 305.99 781.61 591.36 344.45 4.14 5.46 4.42 3.52 Non-Food 701.42 691.19 695.28 698.04 2.56 3.70 2.44 2.11 Total 1007.40 1472.79 1286.64 1047.97 0.52 1.16 0.81 0.48

28 Latur Food 300.60 760.50 576.54 556.63 2.17 0.76 0.76 0.78 Non-Food 670.86 732.19 707.66 722.61 6.64 2.62 3.00 2.44 Total 971.46 1492.68 1284.20 1435.54 3.91 0.89 1.34 0.88

29 Osmanabad Food 344.29 603.13 499.60 598.05 4.89 0.40 1.38 0.39 Non-Food 572.48 426.20 484.71 491.28 2.71 3.26 2.14 2.10 Total 916.77 1029.33 984.31 1006.62 3.53 1.58 1.65 1.44

30 Solapur Food 371.44 710.05 574.61 505.22 1.94 1.26 1.06 1.11 Non-Food 1181.92 710.17 898.87 718.51 9.92 2.21 5.32 2.17 Total 1553.36 1420.22 1473.48 1425.25 8.01 1.74 3.52 1.70

Page 65: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

61

District Code District

Estimate of MPCE (MMRP) RSE of Estimated MPCE (MMRP)

Central State Pooled (MR) Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

31 Satara Food 394.74 721.60 590.86 395.92 0.88 7.99 5.86 0.88 Non-Food 2841.27 810.80 1622.98 822.28 14.67 3.88 10.34 3.81 Total 3235.80 1532.40 2213.76 1605.60 13.00 5.82 7.97 5.43

32 Ratnagiri Food 359.86 1209.72 869.78 374.24 2.03 4.61 3.86 1.94 Non-Food 1145.59 1160.20 1154.36 1160.18 10.26 0.38 4.08 0.38 Total 1505.46 2369.92 2024.13 2206.76 8.29 2.54 3.04 2.46

33 Sindhudurg Food 355.87 956.36 716.17 400.06 4.19 5.53 4.50 3.58 Non-Food 916.37 1216.33 1096.35 1078.07 16.02 11.16 9.16 9.24 Total 1272.24 2172.69 1812.51 1653.73 12.71 8.68 7.19 7.42

34 Kolhapur Food 353.32 873.28 665.30 360.89 0.51 1.69 1.34 0.49 Non-Food 723.64 819.98 781.45 733.07 1.18 3.15 2.03 1.10 Total 1076.96 1693.27 1446.74 1093.34 0.62 2.40 1.69 0.61

35 Sangli Food 360.77 879.23 671.85 428.69 1.61 1.70 1.38 1.26 Non-Food 819.75 826.19 823.62 821.48 6.40 10.47 6.80 5.46 Total 1180.52 1705.42 1495.46 1389.85 4.94 4.20 3.27 3.25

Maharashtra Food 397.37 999.48 758.64 669.93 0.96 0.42 0.39 0.42 Non-Food 1408.53 1284.53 1334.13 1320.80 4.45 3.13 2.61 2.56 Total 1805.90 2283.34 2092.36 2140.29 3.66 1.89 1.77 1.69

Page 66: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

62

Table 6.11 (R): District wise WPR per 1000 (PS+SS) for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Rural (Schedule 10)

District code District

Male Female Persons

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

1 Nandurbar 580 630 605 580 605 490 548 533 592 560 576 587 2 Dhule 570 546 558 569 363 524 443 497 469 536 502 496 3 Jalgaon 564 581 573 566 376 510 443 378 467 548 507 468 4 Buldhana 583 525 554 536 409 424 416 412 497 474 486 488 5 Akola 688 548 618 607 200 338 269 201 446 449 447 449 6 Washim 437 684 560 475 163 317 240 163 310 495 403 310 7 Amravati 657 577 617 645 463 293 378 420 568 436 502 542 8 Wardha 553 615 584 567 443 408 426 436 496 506 501 498 9 Nagpur 562 556 559 556 411 304 358 318 496 447 472 449

10 Bhandara 598 643 621 616 492 288 390 385 545 479 512 518 11 Gondiya 586 617 601 600 561 400 480 531 573 511 542 528 12 Gadchiroli 602 646 624 606 524 514 519 524 559 586 572 559 13 Chandrapur 720 591 655 671 490 325 407 489 600 457 529 545 14 Yavatmal 614 555 584 556 489 275 382 316 560 413 487 424 15 Nanded 443 587 515 443 341 217 279 323 396 405 401 396 16 Hingoli 444 577 511 463 388 141 265 142 417 343 380 417 17 Parbhani 580 568 574 568 310 441 376 413 444 503 474 502 18 Jalna 489 589 539 520 581 248 415 327 533 421 477 529 19 Aurangabad 569 582 575 582 363 204 284 208 474 413 444 416 20 Nashik 588 585 587 588 417 314 366 331 501 458 479 476 21 Thane 604 521 562 539 293 237 265 292 447 374 411 378 24 Raigad 532 540 536 532 307 274 291 305 420 406 413 413 25 Pune 604 635 619 609 392 396 394 393 500 517 508 500 26 Ahmednagar 484 469 476 480 492 355 424 392 488 418 453 433

Page 67: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

63

District code District

Male Female Persons

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

27 Bid 624 568 596 623 378 285 331 332 510 435 473 504 28 Latur 532 547 540 532 234 153 193 214 391 343 367 383 29 Osmanabad 641 551 596 616 405 163 284 173 518 365 442 380 30 Solapur 606 569 588 605 427 407 417 427 518 488 503 518 31 Satara 627 570 598 570 405 417 411 407 516 498 507 508 32 Ratnagiri 606 534 570 571 328 206 267 236 461 353 407 393 33 Sindhudurg 656 512 584 545 374 96 235 147 527 307 417 345 34 Kolhapur 563 635 599 583 392 312 352 318 476 479 477 478 35 Sangli 601 542 572 598 308 355 332 333 448 450 449 448

Maharashtra 576 569 573 575 396 324 360 359 488 450 469 474

Page 68: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

64

Table 6.11 (U): District wise WPR per 1000 (PS+SS) for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Urban (Schedule 10)

District code District

Male Female Persons

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

1 Nandurbar 441 492 471 480 276 52 142 148 376 282 320 301 2 Dhule 473 504 491 504 163 71 108 71 339 303 318 303 3 Jalgaon 608 507 548 508 157 132 142 135 395 328 355 331 4 Buldhana 600 571 583 590 143 195 174 191 375 371 373 372 5 Akola 626 490 545 540 156 85 113 101 391 305 339 337 6 Washim 437 546 502 470 130 118 123 130 305 332 321 312 7 Amravati 522 547 537 537 57 116 93 59 307 339 326 316 8 Wardha 558 522 536 524 209 137 166 148 389 327 352 329 9 Nagpur 573 542 554 557 160 136 146 150 369 346 355 358 10 Bhandara 588 486 526 579 421 139 252 240 507 311 389 454 11 Gondiya 509 536 525 525 115 134 127 118 332 338 336 332 12 Gadchiroli 599 618 611 609 198 209 205 199 404 396 399 402 13 Chandrapur 609 594 600 596 161 105 127 119 376 334 351 345 14 Yavatmal 519 504 510 506 128 145 138 141 331 332 331 332 15 Nanded 502 432 460 478 63 70 67 66 289 255 269 275 16 Hingoli 641 515 566 586 151 121 133 134 416 332 366 375 17 Parbhani 480 554 525 495 91 157 131 157 284 357 328 331 18 Jalna 586 549 564 586 156 73 106 127 369 332 347 368 19 Aurangabad 533 476 499 476 173 86 121 86 339 293 311 293 20 Nashik 485 513 502 500 141 151 147 149 321 347 337 335 21 Thane 624 574 594 622 149 155 153 149 411 383 394 410 22 Mumbai 612 618 616 612 198 135 160 197 425 406 413 425 24 Raigad 570 637 610 635 89 143 121 117 369 386 379 384 25 Pune 544 550 548 546 123 161 146 142 350 369 361 358 26 Ahmednagar 503 496 499 503 139 328 253 143 319 422 381 319 27 Bid 554 479 509 528 104 62 79 70 316 272 289 293

Page 69: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

65

District code District

Male Female Persons

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

28 Latur 431 463 450 457 32 51 44 43 229 275 257 264 29 Osmanabad 635 533 574 585 228 100 151 102 418 332 367 347 30 Solapur 568 506 531 541 318 171 230 172 439 344 382 355 31 Satara 503 573 545 553 84 207 158 119 307 401 363 365 32 Ratnagiri 497 534 519 514 131 192 168 148 314 370 348 336 33 Sindhudurg 542 487 509 513 127 90 104 111 355 289 315 301 34 Kolhapur 516 635 587 540 147 126 134 139 338 392 371 351 35 Sangli 572 514 537 515 119 135 129 130 352 340 345 341

Maharashtra 575 565 569 574 159 141 148 153 380 369 374 378

Page 70: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

66

Table 6.12 (R): District wise LFPR per 1000 for central, state and pooled sample Sector: Rural (Schedule 10)

District code District

PS+SS CWS CDS

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

1 Nandurbar 592 560 576 587 519 560 539 523 471 538 505 478

2 Dhule 469 536 502 496 409 519 464 448 379 497 438 418

3 Jalgaon 468 548 508 469 436 535 486 437 418 524 471 419

4 Buldhana 500 479 489 492 433 450 442 439 419 371 395 399

5 Akola 456 449 452 449 446 456 451 455 421 399 410 399

6 Washim 310 495 403 310 315 495 405 315 298 471 384 298

7 Amravati 568 436 502 542 564 432 498 538 551 409 480 522

8 Wardha 496 506 501 498 487 494 491 488 459 493 476 464

9 Nagpur 507 448 478 450 488 454 471 455 470 454 462 454

10 Bhandara 547 507 527 532 518 507 513 514 515 507 511 512

11 Gondiya 587 523 555 540 538 529 533 532 530 529 529 529

12 Gadchiroli 561 586 573 561 517 586 552 518 498 586 542 498

13 Chandrapur 600 457 529 545 582 457 519 536 574 448 511 527

14 Yavatmal 563 413 488 424 561 413 487 424 555 384 469 396

15 Nanded 396 408 402 396 397 404 401 397 390 398 394 390

16 Hingoli 418 343 380 418 388 363 376 388 380 337 358 380

17 Parbhani 449 503 476 502 449 493 471 493 444 468 456 468

18 Jalna 533 421 477 529 513 421 467 509 436 417 426 436

19 Aurangabad 478 416 447 418 460 414 437 415 441 409 425 411

20 Nashik 501 458 479 477 495 463 479 477 487 447 467 465

21 Thane 450 394 422 397 422 379 401 382 412 372 392 375

24 Raigad 420 415 418 418 392 381 386 387 376 364 370 369

25 Pune 515 518 516 515 514 513 513 514 505 507 506 505

26 Ahmednagar 488 428 458 441 471 429 450 438 455 410 432 420

27 Bid 510 437 473 504 486 423 455 481 453 410 432 450

28 Latur 391 343 367 383 394 343 369 386 391 343 367 383

29 Osmanabad 518 366 442 380 507 355 431 369 497 354 425 368

30 Solapur 518 490 504 518 501 493 497 501 492 480 486 491

31 Satara 521 508 515 516 424 508 466 451 404 496 450 432

32 Ratnagiri 462 354 408 395 462 351 406 392 418 339 379 371

33 Sindhudurg 528 327 428 365 527 322 425 360 483 301 392 352

34 Kolhapur 481 485 483 483 450 473 461 465 419 469 444 450

35 Sangli 449 451 450 449 453 450 452 453 402 441 421 407

Maharashtra 491 453 472 477 469 449 459 462 450 434 442 444

Page 71: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

67

Table 6.12 (U): District wise LFPR per 1000 for central, state and pooled sample Sector: Urban (Schedule 10)

District code District

PS+SS CWS CDS

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

1 Nandurbar 376 290 324 308 360 290 318 306 357 290 317 305

2 Dhule 339 304 318 304 334 304 316 304 334 303 316 303

3 Jalgaon 395 344 364 346 379 337 354 339 373 332 349 335

4 Buldhana 375 372 373 373 372 368 370 369 348 334 340 336

5 Akola 392 329 354 355 389 329 353 354 385 316 344 344

6 Washim 312 333 324 317 298 333 319 307 297 320 311 304

7 Amravati 307 344 329 317 306 344 328 316 302 334 321 311

8 Wardha 400 344 366 346 386 336 356 338 377 338 354 339

9 Nagpur 381 362 369 373 373 362 366 368 365 362 363 364

10 Bhandara 513 333 405 468 523 336 411 476 514 336 407 470

11 Gondiya 356 360 358 356 350 360 356 350 348 359 354 348

12 Gadchiroli 404 407 406 405 375 407 394 383 368 407 391 378

13 Chandrapur 376 339 354 350 371 337 351 347 367 336 349 345

14 Yavatmal 331 333 332 333 331 331 331 331 329 322 325 323

15 Nanded 296 262 276 282 296 262 276 282 296 262 276 282

16 Hingoli 416 351 377 386 406 351 373 381 406 346 370 379

17 Parbhani 299 360 336 339 275 349 320 322 270 341 312 315

18 Jalna 373 345 356 373 373 345 356 373 364 345 352 364

19 Aurangabad 341 300 316 300 330 300 312 300 327 299 310 299

20 Nashik 325 352 341 339 320 352 340 337 315 345 333 331

21 Thane 427 396 408 426 426 396 408 425 419 392 403 418 22 Mumbai 446 413 426 446 447 413 426 447 438 412 422 438

24 Raigad 369 399 387 395 367 399 386 394 356 394 379 389

25 Pune 366 376 372 371 360 375 369 366 352 372 364 361

26 Ahmednagar 330 446 400 331 330 441 396 330 325 400 370 325

27 Bid 316 301 307 309 302 301 301 301 289 298 294 293

28 Latur 229 275 257 264 229 275 257 264 227 276 256 264

29 Osmanabad 438 332 375 349 438 332 375 349 430 323 366 341

30 Solapur 440 349 385 359 433 349 382 359 426 345 378 355

31 Satara 313 408 370 372 307 405 366 368 306 406 366 366

32 Ratnagiri 337 408 380 365 337 408 380 365 337 407 379 364

33 Sindhudurg 371 306 332 319 371 298 327 311 361 295 321 306

34 Kolhapur 343 397 375 355 332 397 371 346 330 397 370 345

35 Sangli 359 356 357 356 359 356 357 356 348 353 351 352

Maharashtra 392 379 384 390 389 378 383 387 382 375 378 381

Page 72: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

68

Table 6.13 (R): District wise RSE of estimated WPR per 1000 (PS+SS) for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Rural (Schedule 10)

District code District

Male Female Persons

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

1 Nandurbar 0.87 6.05 4.49 0.86 2.43 2.31 2.40 1.68 0.71 1.84 1.37 0.66

2 Dhule 0.87 5.17 3.63 0.85 6.31 1.97 4.01 1.89 3.53 3.78 3.68 2.59

3 Jalgaon 2.90 9.56 7.15 2.77 0.89 5.11 4.19 0.88 0.95 7.45 5.72 0.94

4 Buldhana 2.59 1.38 2.14 1.22 5.60 9.32 7.76 4.80 4.07 5.35 4.72 3.24

5 Akola 5.54 5.95 5.74 4.08 0.35 7.59 6.74 0.35 2.96 0.43 2.11 0.43

6 Washim 0.49 0.73 0.68 0.41 0.98 9.90 9.26 0.97 0.19 4.75 4.13 0.19

7 Amravati 5.04 13.88 9.93 4.74 1.26 3.45 2.18 1.20 3.31 8.68 5.95 3.11

8 Wardha 2.00 3.25 2.77 1.70 6.83 14.14 10.83 6.16 2.58 5.88 4.57 2.37

9 Nagpur 7.68 0.11 5.46 0.11 7.85 4.07 6.83 3.63 7.76 1.70 5.88 1.66

10 Bhandara 3.63 4.21 3.95 2.75 5.08 8.26 6.26 4.47 4.35 6.08 5.19 3.55

11 Gondiya 2.36 2.38 2.37 1.68 0.34 1.03 0.67 0.33 1.04 0.71 0.91 0.59

12 Gadchiroli 1.20 3.58 2.75 1.14 1.58 8.45 6.02 1.55 0.34 5.81 4.21 0.34

13 Chandrapur 8.60 13.40 10.84 7.27 0.02 0.48 0.27 0.02 4.13 6.89 5.36 3.57

14 Yavatmal 6.57 1.13 4.94 1.11 7.46 6.48 7.51 5.06 6.95 2.73 5.89 2.56

15 Nanded 0.23 10.74 8.66 0.23 2.64 9.98 5.94 2.57 1.34 10.36 7.47 1.33

16 Hingoli 7.88 15.02 12.95 7.01 8.97 1.73 9.33 1.71 0.24 7.86 5.02 0.24

17 Parbhani 8.66 0.89 6.22 0.89 6.51 2.40 4.29 2.27 7.58 0.80 5.06 0.79

18 Jalna 5.10 6.22 5.81 3.96 8.24 10.79 9.35 7.13 1.31 8.46 5.38 1.30

19 Aurangabad 5.37 0.95 3.82 0.94 3.95 1.24 3.64 1.19 4.72 1.08 3.63 1.05

20 Nashik 1.00 2.95 2.20 0.95 5.11 2.99 4.51 2.60 3.11 2.97 3.05 2.15

21 Thane 7.52 4.54 6.44 3.89 0.18 2.22 1.41 0.17 3.64 1.03 2.89 0.99

24 Raigad 0.03 2.36 1.68 0.03 0.52 2.91 1.98 0.51 0.27 0.31 0.29 0.20

25 Pune 1.16 2.58 2.04 1.06 0.83 2.02 1.55 0.77 0.18 2.31 1.66 0.18

26 Ahmednagar 0.40 0.66 0.54 0.34 4.85 4.09 4.66 3.16 2.44 1.45 2.08 1.25

27 Bid 1.20 10.22 6.94 1.19 6.43 8.63 7.37 5.21 2.34 9.47 6.42 2.27

Page 73: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

69

District code District

Male Female Persons

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

28 Latur 0.50 2.31 1.69 0.49 2.73 7.33 4.72 2.59 1.03 2.69 1.94 0.96

29 Osmanabad 2.86 5.37 4.13 2.53 4.38 2.32 4.52 2.13 3.65 1.68 3.18 1.54

30 Solapur 1.37 7.92 5.51 1.35 0.14 1.69 1.17 0.14 0.63 4.82 3.34 0.62

31 Satara 2.15 0.23 1.60 0.23 2.60 5.85 4.57 2.38 2.37 2.87 2.63 1.83

32 Ratnagiri 2.87 3.33 3.08 2.18 7.61 7.05 7.64 5.30 5.34 5.38 5.40 3.82

33 Sindhudurg 2.00 1.40 1.81 1.15 2.83 5.19 3.52 3.08 2.38 1.86 2.34 1.51

34 Kolhapur 3.62 5.26 4.62 2.99 8.23 2.93 6.74 2.77 5.98 4.14 5.14 3.41

35 Sangli 1.47 6.81 4.69 1.43 2.29 1.85 2.06 1.44 1.90 4.38 3.38 1.74

Maharashtra 0.70 1.16 0.95 0.60 0.83 1.01 0.91 0.64 0.65 0.93 0.79 0.53

Page 74: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

70

Table 6.13 (U): District wise RSE of estimated WPR per 1000 (PS+SS) for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Urban (Schedule 10)

District code District

Male Female Persons

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

1 Nandurbar 7.50 3.66 3.34 3.29 0.59 2.71 5.60 0.72 4.78 3.20 3.98 2.68 2 Dhule 14.96 0.25 3.26 0.25 15.36 0.88 6.67 0.88 15.13 0.54 4.03 0.54 3 Jalgaon 15.04 1.88 3.06 1.86 11.80 5.36 6.00 4.89 13.51 3.54 3.79 3.42 4 Buldhana 6.64 9.13 2.98 5.37 9.24 1.78 5.54 1.75 7.93 3.34 3.73 3.08 5 Akola 14.21 13.75 3.05 9.95 8.53 8.53 6.57 6.29 11.37 11.36 3.87 8.09 6 Washim 10.81 13.05 3.25 8.37 1.24 7.18 6.48 1.22 6.66 10.11 4.04 5.57 7 Amravati 4.99 3.82 3.12 3.03 2.76 8.12 7.71 2.65 3.96 5.90 4.01 3.29 8 Wardha 8.11 1.90 3.10 1.85 9.05 5.64 5.49 4.86 8.56 1.92 3.81 1.88 9 Nagpur 1.10 1.17 3.06 0.80 0.65 0.90 5.93 0.53 0.86 1.03 3.82 0.66

10 Bhandara 1.67 6.69 3.11 1.63 6.22 13.98 4.30 6.52 3.87 10.37 3.57 3.70 11 Gondiya 3.26 2.59 3.15 2.03 4.21 7.85 6.45 3.72 0.09 5.20 3.94 0.09 12 Gadchiroli 2.12 1.99 2.92 1.45 2.84 8.66 5.05 2.70 2.46 3.80 3.61 2.07 13 Chandrapur 7.26 2.74 2.94 2.57 9.87 8.98 6.26 6.78 8.62 6.05 3.83 4.96 14 Yavatmal 13.77 5.07 3.19 4.76 11.72 5.98 6.16 5.34 12.79 5.51 3.96 5.06 15 Nanded 8.36 13.23 3.34 7.09 10.13 11.10 8.84 7.50 9.22 12.18 4.37 7.37 16 Hingoli 13.90 19.66 3.00 11.42 13.94 15.87 6.19 10.54 13.92 17.91 3.73 11.06 17 Parbhani 4.21 7.32 3.17 3.66 8.85 0.44 6.45 0.44 6.56 3.90 4.02 3.37 18 Jalna 1.05 16.18 3.03 1.04 2.68 7.73 6.73 2.65 0.84 12.31 3.85 0.84 19 Aurangabad 17.74 0.31 3.21 0.31 18.69 0.48 6.33 0.48 18.25 0.40 4.06 0.40 20 Nashik 4.55 4.03 3.23 3.02 4.78 2.56 5.96 2.26 3.87 3.35 3.94 2.53 21 Thane 5.92 33.80 2.95 5.84 5.14 35.28 5.85 5.09 5.52 34.46 3.62 5.45 22 Mumbai 0.15 10.40 2.91 0.15 0.73 6.11 5.59 0.72 0.25 8.51 3.54 0.25 24 Raigad 16.73 3.01 2.93 2.96 13.41 7.90 6.68 6.99 15.34 5.49 3.71 5.17 25 Pune 2.68 3.59 3.08 2.15 4.07 3.05 6.04 2.47 3.13 3.32 3.80 2.28 26 Ahmednagar 2.73 15.76 3.23 2.69 5.40 16.79 4.69 5.22 1.39 16.22 3.74 1.38 27 Bid 5.14 8.13 3.17 4.35 7.38 6.01 7.91 4.78 6.33 7.08 4.21 4.73

Page 75: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

71

District code District

Male Female Persons

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

28 Latur 4.49 1.90 3.41 1.75 2.81 1.53 11.12 1.38 3.66 1.74 4.54 1.57 29 Osmanabad 5.74 6.93 2.99 4.44 10.99 2.61 5.63 2.56 8.54 4.93 3.73 4.29 30 Solapur 4.68 5.97 3.11 3.69 11.78 1.66 4.61 1.65 8.37 3.89 3.65 3.54

31 Satara 30.99 17.33 3.11 15.15 29.85 19.03 5.94 17.73 30.46 18.13 3.83 15.70 32 Ratnagiri 20.42 20.40 3.18 14.44 23.09 25.09 5.66 17.28 21.76 22.65 3.90 15.74 33 Sindhudurg 4.95 5.22 3.18 3.60 7.68 12.55 6.94 6.64 6.19 3.65 4.02 3.15 34 Kolhapur 4.48 7.10 3.00 3.80 2.80 4.37 6.18 2.36 3.67 5.79 3.77 3.11 35 Sangli 12.36 1.79 3.10 1.78 8.88 5.54 6.39 4.71 10.67 3.52 3.88 3.35

Maharashtra 1.52 4.41 3.02 1.44 1.53 2.44 5.89 1.30 1.49 3.49 3.73 1.37

Page 76: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

72

Table 6.14 (R): District wise RSE of LFPR for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Rural (Schedule 10)

District code District

PS+SS CWS CDS

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

1 Nandurbar 0.71 1.84 0.97 0.66 0.71 1.84 1.01 0.66 0.71 1.85 1.04 0.67 2 Dhule 3.53 3.78 2.60 2.59 3.54 3.78 2.62 2.60 3.54 3.78 2.63 2.61 3 Jalgaon 0.95 7.45 4.04 0.94 0.94 7.45 4.13 0.94 0.94 7.39 4.13 0.94 4 Buldhana 4.07 5.35 3.34 3.24 4.07 5.34 3.38 3.24 4.07 5.35 3.32 3.25 5 Akola 2.96 0.43 1.51 0.43 2.96 0.43 1.48 0.43 2.96 0.48 1.54 0.47 6 Washim 0.19 4.75 2.92 0.19 0.19 4.75 2.90 0.19 0.19 4.75 2.91 0.19 7 Amravati 3.31 8.68 4.21 3.11 3.31 8.68 4.21 3.11 3.31 8.78 4.20 3.12 8 Wardha 2.58 5.88 3.23 2.37 2.58 5.88 3.23 2.37 2.58 5.88 3.29 2.37 9 Nagpur 7.76 1.70 4.20 1.66 7.76 1.70 4.10 1.66 7.76 1.70 4.03 1.66

10 Bhandara 4.35 6.08 3.70 3.54 4.35 6.08 3.73 3.54 4.35 6.08 3.73 3.54 11 Gondiya 1.04 0.71 0.64 0.59 1.04 0.71 0.63 0.59 1.04 0.91 0.69 0.69 12 Gadchiroli 0.34 5.81 2.97 0.34 0.34 5.81 3.09 0.34 0.34 5.80 3.14 0.34 13 Chandrapur 4.13 6.89 3.79 3.57 4.13 6.89 3.81 3.56 4.13 6.88 3.81 3.56 14 Yavatmal 6.95 2.73 4.17 2.56 6.95 2.73 4.17 2.56 6.95 2.74 4.26 2.56 15 Nanded 1.34 10.36 5.30 1.33 1.34 10.36 5.27 1.33 1.34 10.37 5.28 1.33 16 Hingoli 0.24 7.86 3.54 0.24 0.23 7.85 3.79 0.23 0.23 7.70 3.62 0.23 17 Parbhani 7.58 0.80 3.60 0.79 7.58 0.80 3.64 0.79 7.58 0.16 3.69 0.16 18 Jalna 1.31 8.46 3.81 1.30 1.31 8.46 3.89 1.30 1.31 8.46 4.19 1.29 19 Aurangabad 4.72 1.08 2.57 1.05 4.72 1.08 2.54 1.05 4.72 1.07 2.50 1.04 20 Nashik 3.11 2.97 2.15 2.15 3.11 2.97 2.15 2.15 3.11 2.97 2.15 2.15 21 Thane 3.65 1.03 2.00 0.99 3.64 1.03 1.98 0.99 3.64 1.03 1.98 0.99 24 Raigad 0.27 0.31 0.21 0.21 0.27 0.31 0.21 0.20 0.27 0.25 0.18 0.18 25 Pune 0.18 2.31 1.16 0.18 0.18 2.31 1.16 0.18 0.18 2.31 1.16 0.18 26 Ahmednagar 2.44 1.45 1.47 1.25 2.44 1.45 1.45 1.25 2.44 1.45 1.46 1.25 27 Bid 2.34 9.47 4.55 2.27 2.34 9.47 4.58 2.27 2.34 9.48 4.67 2.27 28 Latur 1.03 2.69 1.37 0.96 1.03 2.69 1.36 0.96 1.03 2.69 1.37 0.96

Page 77: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

73

District code District

PS+SS CWS CDS

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

29 Osmanabad 3.65 1.68 2.25 1.54 3.65 1.68 2.26 1.54 3.65 1.68 2.24 1.53 30 Solapur 0.63 4.82 2.36 0.62 0.63 4.82 2.41 0.62 0.63 4.84 2.41 0.62 31 Satara 2.37 2.87 1.86 1.83 2.37 2.87 1.90 1.84 2.37 2.87 1.91 1.84 32 Ratnagiri 5.34 5.38 3.82 3.82 5.34 5.38 3.82 3.82 5.34 5.39 3.81 3.81 33 Sindhudurg 2.38 1.86 1.63 1.50 2.38 1.86 1.64 1.50 2.38 2.40 1.73 1.73 34 Kolhapur 5.98 4.14 3.63 3.41 5.98 4.14 3.61 3.41 5.99 4.14 3.57 3.41 35 Sangli 1.90 4.38 2.39 1.74 1.90 4.38 2.38 1.74 1.90 4.41 2.48 1.74

Maharashtra 0.65 0.93 0.56 0.53 0.65 0.93 0.56 0.53 0.65 0.93 0.56 0.53

Page 78: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

74

Table 6.14 (U): District wise RSE of LFPR for central, state and pooled sample

Sector: Urban (Schedule 10)

District code District

PS+SS CWS CDS

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

1 Nandurbar 4.78 3.20 4.83 2.68 4.78 3.20 4.88 2.67 4.78 3.20 2.78 2.67 2 Dhule 15.13 0.54 6.50 0.54 15.13 0.54 6.45 0.54 15.13 0.55 6.42 0.55 3 Jalgaon 13.51 3.53 7.70 3.42 13.51 3.53 7.69 3.42 13.51 3.56 6.13 3.44 4 Buldhana 7.93 3.34 5.93 3.08 7.93 3.34 5.93 3.08 7.93 3.34 3.80 3.08 5 Akola 11.37 11.36 16.60 8.06 11.36 11.36 16.64 8.06 11.37 11.35 8.07 8.07 6 Washim 6.66 10.11 15.76 5.56 6.66 10.11 16.02 5.57 6.66 10.11 6.74 5.56 7 Amravati 3.96 5.90 9.37 3.29 3.96 5.90 9.38 3.29 3.96 5.90 3.97 3.29 8 Wardha 8.56 1.92 4.62 1.88 8.56 1.92 4.60 1.88 8.56 1.76 3.79 1.72 9 Nagpur 0.86 1.03 1.56 0.66 0.86 1.03 1.57 0.66 0.86 1.01 0.70 0.65

10 Bhandara 3.87 10.37 12.93 3.68 3.88 10.37 12.88 3.68 3.88 10.37 5.50 3.68 11 Gondiya 0.10 5.19 7.82 0.10 0.10 5.19 7.88 0.10 0.10 4.89 2.97 0.10 12 Gadchiroli 2.46 3.80 5.80 2.07 2.46 3.80 5.96 2.07 2.46 3.80 2.55 2.07 13 Chandrapur 8.62 6.05 9.44 4.96 8.62 6.05 9.45 4.96 8.62 6.02 5.03 4.94 14 Yavatmal 12.79 5.51 9.73 5.06 12.79 5.51 9.72 5.06 12.79 5.64 6.17 5.16 15 Nanded 9.22 12.18 17.81 7.36 9.22 12.18 17.81 7.36 9.22 12.18 7.99 7.36 16 Hingoli 13.92 17.91 25.76 11.03 13.92 17.91 25.98 11.02 13.92 17.89 11.75 11.02 17 Parbhani 6.56 3.90 6.70 3.36 6.57 3.90 6.77 3.37 6.57 3.88 3.41 3.36 18 Jalna 0.84 12.31 17.89 0.84 0.84 12.31 17.88 0.84 0.84 12.31 7.23 0.84 19 Aurangabad 18.26 0.40 7.90 0.40 18.26 0.40 7.75 0.40 18.26 0.40 7.70 0.40 20 Nashik 3.87 3.35 5.40 2.53 3.87 3.35 5.42 2.54 3.87 3.37 2.56 2.54 21 Thane 5.52 34.46 50.18 5.45 5.52 34.46 50.25 5.45 5.52 34.47 20.26 5.45 22 Mumbai 0.25 8.51 12.36 0.25 0.25 8.51 12.35 0.25 0.25 8.50 4.97 0.25 24 Raigad 15.34 5.49 10.31 5.17 15.34 5.49 10.32 5.17 15.34 5.43 6.69 5.12 25 Pune 3.13 3.32 5.18 2.28 3.13 3.32 5.21 2.28 3.13 3.32 2.37 2.28 26 Ahmednagar 1.39 16.22 27.15 1.38 1.39 16.22 27.06 1.38 1.39 16.31 10.59 1.38

Page 79: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

75

District code District

PS+SS CWS CDS

Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV) Central State Pooled

(MR) Pooled

(IV) Central State Pooled (MR)

Pooled (IV)

27 Bid 6.33 7.09 10.74 4.72 6.33 7.09 10.92 4.72 6.33 7.09 4.97 4.72 28 Latur 3.66 1.74 3.09 1.57 3.66 1.74 3.09 1.57 3.65 1.68 1.69 1.53 29 Osmanabad 8.55 4.93 7.68 4.29 8.55 4.93 7.68 4.29 8.55 5.05 4.83 4.37 30 Solapur 8.37 3.89 6.52 3.54 8.37 3.89 6.53 3.54 8.37 3.91 4.34 3.55 31 Satara 30.46 18.13 31.72 15.70 30.45 18.13 31.79 15.71 30.45 18.50 15.98 15.95 32 Ratnagiri 21.75 22.65 37.32 15.76 21.75 22.65 37.32 15.76 21.75 22.65 16.52 15.76 33 Sindhudurg 6.18 3.65 5.75 3.15 6.18 3.65 5.72 3.15 6.18 3.46 3.37 3.03 34 Kolhapur 3.67 5.79 9.29 3.11 3.67 5.79 9.39 3.11 3.67 5.79 3.95 3.11 35 Sangli 10.67 3.53 6.79 3.35 10.67 3.53 6.79 3.35 10.67 3.53 4.74 3.35

Maharashtra 1.49 3.49 5.19 1.37 1.49 3.49 5.21 1.37 1.49 3.49 2.16 1.37

Page 80: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

76

DETAILED TABLES

Table 21: Per thousand distribution of persons by usual activity category taking also into consideration the subsidiary economic status of persons categorized 'not working' in the principal status.

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Rural Pooled sample Male

District code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 all 11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 369 17 219 605 0 605 395 1000 1841 86 1091 3018 0 3018 1967 4985 2 Dhule 260 62 235 557 0 557 443 1000 1811 435 1636 3882 0 3882 3083 6964 3 Jalgaon 241 64 267 573 1 574 426 1000 3108 825 3443 7376 18 7394 5484 12878 4 Buldhana 241 38 276 555 6 561 439 1000 2520 400 2888 5808 65 5872 4593 10465 5 Akola 167 36 406 609 5 615 385 1000 777 166 1886 2829 25 2854 1789 4642 6 Washim 151 42 355 548 0 548 452 1000 742 207 1748 2697 0 2697 2227 4923 7 Amravati 281 19 316 616 1 617 383 1000 2347 159 2638 5144 8 5153 3197 8350 8 Wardha 235 73 277 584 0 584 416 1000 899 278 1061 2237 0 2237 1595 3832 9 Nagpur 254 86 219 559 2 562 438 1000 1822 619 1570 4012 17 4029 3143 7172 10 Bhandara 186 16 417 619 24 642 358 1000 868 75 1951 2894 111 3006 1674 4679 11 Gondiya 313 58 229 600 22 622 378 1000 1576 295 1153 3023 109 3132 1903 5035 12 Gadchiroli 200 35 392 627 2 629 371 1000 883 154 1729 2766 8 2774 1639 4413 13 Chandrapur 260 40 356 655 0 655 345 1000 1798 274 2465 4537 0 4537 2389 6926 14 Yavatmal 220 49 317 585 1 586 414 1000 2419 535 3485 6438 10 6449 4556 11005 15 Nanded 333 32 154 519 0 519 481 1000 3586 346 1656 5588 1 5589 5181 10770 16 Hingoli 232 30 256 518 1 519 481 1000 1094 142 1209 2444 4 2448 2270 4717 17 Parbhani 393 9 172 574 5 579 421 1000 2107 47 923 3077 27 3104 2257 5361 18 Jalna 278 46 222 546 0 546 454 1000 2082 342 1666 4090 0 4090 3399 7490 19 Aurangabad 270 48 256 574 6 580 420 1000 2887 510 2734 6131 63 6194 4491 10685 20 Nashik 349 58 180 586 0 587 413 1000 4516 746 2325 7587 2 7589 5349 12938 21 Thane 170 150 238 559 16 575 425 1000 2173 1922 3047 7142 204 7346 5433 12780 24 Raigad 210 132 194 537 11 548 452 1000 1640 1033 1517 4190 88 4278 3527 7806

Page 81: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

77

District

code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 all 11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

25 Pune 313 106 200 619 15 634 366 1000 4830 1630 3087 9546 239 9785 5640 15424 26 Ahmednagar 262 44 170 476 9 485 515 1000 4668 786 3029 8482 153 8635 9171 17806 27 Bid 382 20 192 594 0 594 406 1000 3976 207 2002 6185 0 6185 4231 10416 28 Latur 318 45 176 539 0 539 461 1000 3021 423 1675 5119 0 5119 4376 9494 29 Osmanabad 348 43 204 596 0 596 404 1000 1957 243 1149 3348 1 3349 2268 5617 30 Solapur 292 76 220 587 1 588 412 1000 3777 979 2852 7608 13 7620 5330 12950 31 Satara 337 107 155 599 10 609 391 1000 3746 1185 1723 6654 113 6767 4348 11115 32 Ratnagiri 350 33 187 570 2 572 428 1000 2087 197 1110 3394 11 3405 2549 5954 33 Sindhudurg 347 31 212 589 18 608 392 1000 1307 115 796 2218 69 2288 1476 3763 34 Kolhapur 336 92 171 599 8 607 393 1000 4231 1153 2159 7544 98 7642 4954 12596 35 Sangli 356 81 131 567 1 568 432 1000 3788 858 1393 6039 12 6051 4599 10649

Maharashtra 284 61 228 573 5 578 422 1000 80884 17370 64793 163047 1469 164516 120084 284600

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 82: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

78

Table 21: Per thousand distribution of persons by usual activity category taking also into consideration the subsidiary economic status of persons categorized 'not working' in the principal status.

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Rural Pooled sample Female

District code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-

99 all 11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 347 4 192 544 0 544 456 1000 1673 19 925 2617 0 2617 2197 4814 2 Dhule 213 14 212 439 0 439 561 1000 1275 82 1270 2626 0 2626 3362 5989 3 Jalgaon 168 5 265 437 0 437 563 1000 2120 61 3350 5531 5 5536 7122 12657 4 Buldhana 173 3 240 416 0 417 583 1000 1778 31 2474 4283 4 4287 6004 10292 5 Akola 23 7 244 274 4 278 722 1000 101 28 1057 1187 17 1204 3130 4334

6 Washim 24 3 213 241 0 241 759 1000 113 15 997 1125 0 1125 3550 4675

7 Amravati 126 6 237 369 0 369 631 1000 968 44 1825 2837 0 2837 4848 7685 8 Wardha 148 2 276 425 1 426 574 1000 618 9 1153 1780 2 1782 2401 4183 9 Nagpur 168 5 186 359 10 369 631 1000 926 25 1028 1979 55 2034 3481 5516

10 Bhandara 80 4 323 407 3 409 591 1000 351 17 1420 1788 11 1800 2595 4395 11 Gondiya 245 30 209 484 4 488 512 1000 1178 143 1006 2327 20 2347 2465 4812 12 Gadchiroli 116 5 398 519 0 519 481 1000 523 24 1795 2342 0 2342 2166 4508 13 Chandrapur 87 4 319 410 0 410 590 1000 631 31 2321 2983 0 2983 4296 7280 14 Yavatmal 79 13 276 368 2 370 630 1000 769 129 2681 3580 17 3597 6128 9725 15 Nanded 106 1 164 272 3 275 725 1000 1047 14 1614 2675 33 2708 7125 9832 16 Hingoli 80 3 154 238 0 238 762 1000 402 16 770 1187 0 1187 3810 4997 17 Parbhani 214 2 160 375 0 375 625 1000 1183 8 885 2076 0 2076 3457 5533 18 Jalna 186 0 200 386 0 386 614 1000 1323 0 1422 2745 0 2745 4359 7104 19 Aurangabad 154 2 149 305 0 305 695 1000 1379 18 1336 2732 2 2734 6219 8953 20 Nashik 173 20 169 362 0 362 638 1000 2137 241 2090 4469 0 4469 7869 12338 21 Thane 137 22 102 262 9 270 730 1000 1835 296 1372 3504 116 3620 9768 13388 24 Raigad 171 14 103 288 0 288 712 1000 1353 107 815 2275 2 2278 5627 7905 25 Pune 259 5 130 394 1 395 605 1000 3884 81 1941 5905 13 5918 9068 14986

Page 83: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

79

District

code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-

99 all 11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

26 Ahmednagar 197 8 221 426 1 427 573 1000 2889 113 3248 6249 19 6268 8407 14674 27 Bid 151 12 164 327 2 328 672 1000 1374 109 1496 2978 15 2993 6123 9116 28 Latur 64 4 123 192 0 192 808 1000 597 41 1144 1781 0 1781 7514 9296 29 Osmanabad 138 9 148 294 1 295 705 1000 776 48 836 1660 4 1664 3979 5643 30 Solapur 228 23 166 417 0 417 583 1000 2888 287 2105 5280 1 5282 7389 12671 31 Satara 286 21 104 411 5 416 584 1000 2998 225 1089 4311 51 4362 6135 10497 32 Ratnagiri 194 3 66 263 0 263 737 1000 1336 19 456 1811 1 1813 5084 6896 33 Sindhudurg 177 5 53 235 1 236 764 1000 598 17 180 795 3 798 2586 3384 34 Kolhapur 251 9 94 355 3 357 643 1000 3128 117 1172 4417 34 4451 8006 12457 35 Sangli 239 6 89 334 0 334 666 1000 2591 63 969 3623 0 3623 7237 10861 Maharashtra 172 9 178 359 2 361 639 1000 46742 2478 48240 97461 426 97887 173508 271395

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 84: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

80

Table 21: Per thousand distribution of persons by usual activity category taking also into consideration the subsidiary economic status of persons categorized 'not working' in the principal status.

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Rural Pooled sample Persons

District code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-

99 all 11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 359 11 206 575 0 575 425 1000 3513 104 2017 5634 0 5635 4164 9798 2 Dhule 238 40 224 502 0 502 498 1000 3086 516 2906 6508 0 6508 6445 12953 3 Jalgaon 205 35 266 505 1 506 494 1000 5229 886 6792 12907 23 12929 12606 25535 4 Buldhana 207 21 258 486 3 489 511 1000 4298 432 5361 10091 69 10160 10597 20757 5 Akola 98 22 328 447 5 452 548 1000 879 194 2943 4016 42 4058 4918 8976 6 Washim 89 23 286 398 0 398 602 1000 855 222 2745 3821 0 3821 5777 9598 7 Amravati 207 13 278 498 1 498 502 1000 3315 203 4464 7981 8 7990 8045 16035 8 Wardha 189 36 276 501 0 501 499 1000 1517 287 2213 4017 2 4020 3996 8015 9 Nagpur 217 51 205 472 6 478 522 1000 2748 644 2598 5991 73 6063 6624 12688

10 Bhandara 134 10 371 516 14 530 470 1000 1220 92 3371 4683 123 4805 4269 9074 11 Gondiya 280 44 219 543 13 556 444 1000 2754 438 2159 5350 129 5479 4368 9847 12 Gadchiroli 158 20 395 573 1 573 427 1000 1406 178 3524 5107 8 5116 3805 8921 13 Chandrapur 171 21 337 529 0 529 471 1000 2429 305 4787 7520 0 7520 6685 14205 14 Yavatmal 154 32 297 483 1 485 515 1000 3188 664 6166 10018 28 10046 10683 20730 15 Nanded 225 17 159 401 2 403 597 1000 4633 360 3270 8263 34 8296 12306 20602 16 Hingoli 154 16 204 374 0 374 626 1000 1495 157 1979 3631 4 3635 6079 9714 17 Parbhani 302 5 166 473 2 475 525 1000 3290 55 1808 5152 27 5179 5714 10893 18 Jalna 233 23 212 468 0 468 532 1000 3405 342 3088 6836 0 6836 7758 14594 19 Aurangabad 217 27 207 451 3 455 545 1000 4266 528 4070 8863 65 8928 10710 19638 20 Nashik 263 39 175 477 0 477 523 1000 6653 987 4416 12056 2 12058 13218 25276 21 Thane 153 85 169 407 12 419 581 1000 4008 2218 4419 10646 320 10966 15202 26168 24 Raigad 191 73 148 412 6 417 583 1000 2994 1140 2332 6466 90 6556 9155 15710

Page 85: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

81

District code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-

99 all 11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

25 Pune 287 56 165 508 8 516 484 1000 8713 1711 5028 15452 251 15703 14707 30410 26 Ahmednagar 233 28 193 454 5 459 541 1000 7556 899 6276 14731 172 14903 17578 32481 27 Bid 274 16 179 469 1 470 530 1000 5349 316 3498 9163 15 9178 10354 19532 28 Latur 193 25 150 367 0 367 633 1000 3618 463 2819 6900 0 6900 11890 18790 29 Osmanabad 243 26 176 445 0 445 555 1000 2733 291 1984 5008 5 5013 6246 11260 30 Solapur 260 49 193 503 1 504 496 1000 6665 1267 4956 12888 14 12902 12719 25621 31 Satara 312 65 130 507 8 515 485 1000 6743 1409 2812 10964 165 11129 10483 21612 32 Ratnagiri 266 17 122 405 1 406 594 1000 3423 215 1567 5205 13 5218 7633 12850 33 Sindhudurg 267 18 137 422 10 432 568 1000 1905 132 976 3014 72 3086 4062 7147 34 Kolhapur 294 51 133 477 5 483 517 1000 7359 1270 3332 11961 132 12093 12960 25053 35 Sangli 297 43 110 449 1 450 550 1000 6380 921 2361 9662 12 9674 11836 21510 Maharashtra 230 36 203 469 3 472 528 1000 127626 19848 113034 260508 1895 262403 293592 555995

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 86: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

82

Table 21: Per thousand distribution of persons by usual activity category taking also into consideration the subsidiary economic status of persons categorized 'not working' in the principal status.

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Urban Pooled Sample Male

District code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-

99 all 11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 176 237 52 465 7 473 527 1000 153 205 45 403 6 409 457 866 2 Dhule 190 201 101 493 1 493 507 1000 362 384 192 938 2 940 965 1905 3 Jalgaon 244 156 150 550 17 567 433 1000 1029 655 632 2316 72 2388 1822 4210 4 Buldhana 275 123 186 584 1 585 415 1000 536 239 363 1138 2 1140 808 1948 5 Akola 240 188 94 522 32 554 446 1000 676 531 266 1474 91 1564 1258 2823 6 Washim 285 104 127 517 4 521 479 1000 248 91 111 449 4 453 416 869 7 Amravati 268 152 115 536 6 542 458 1000 1136 644 488 2268 25 2293 1937 4230 8 Wardha 195 215 128 538 12 550 450 1000 232 256 152 640 14 654 534 1188 9 Nagpur 232 233 88 554 14 569 431 1000 2924 2941 1114 6979 182 7161 5435 12595

10 Bhandara 234 188 106 529 15 544 456 1000 140 112 64 316 9 325 273 599 11 Gondiya 215 211 97 522 25 547 453 1000 166 163 75 403 20 423 349 772 12 Gadchiroli 196 303 111 609 13 622 378 1000 58 90 33 181 4 185 112 297 13 Chandrapur 188 229 182 600 2 603 397 1000 493 600 477 1570 6 1576 1039 2615 14 Yavatmal 225 148 137 510 1 511 489 1000 570 376 348 1293 3 1296 1239 2535 15 Nanded 208 138 119 465 13 478 522 1000 734 488 421 1643 46 1690 1845 3535 16 Hingoli 251 158 143 552 3 555 445 1000 249 157 142 548 3 551 442 993 17 Parbhani 216 105 199 520 17 537 463 1000 482 235 443 1159 38 1197 1031 2228 18 Jalna 143 187 226 556 18 574 426 1000 267 350 422 1039 34 1073 796 1869 19 Aurangabad 164 251 86 501 7 508 492 1000 982 1498 513 2993 40 3033 2943 5976 20 Nashik 166 191 146 503 6 509 491 1000 1351 1557 1190 4098 47 4145 4005 8150 21 Thane 168 400 26 594 16 611 389 1000 6609 15731 1022 23362 640 24001 15306 39307 22 Mumbai 225 367 23 615 14 630 370 1000 13808 22495 1387 37691 875 38566 22677 61243 24 Raigad 185 373 47 604 10 614 386 1000 649 1310 166 2125 34 2159 1356 3515 25 Pune 173 322 54 548 15 563 437 1000 4616 8579 1430 14625 396 15022 11649 26671 26 Ahmednagar 235 140 123 498 35 533 467 1000 1010 601 527 2139 150 2289 2006 4295

Page 87: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

83

District code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-

99 all 11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

27 Bid 194 175 132 501 22 523 477 1000 369 334 251 954 43 997 908 1904 28 Latur 231 115 107 453 0 453 547 1000 626 311 291 1227 0 1227 1481 2707 29 Osmanabad 265 116 181 562 10 571 429 1000 289 127 197 612 10 623 467 1090 30 Solapur 211 202 119 532 6 538 462 1000 1140 1090 641 2870 33 2903 2495 5399 31 Satara 307 165 69 542 13 554 446 1000 771 414 174 1360 32 1392 1119 2511 32 Ratnagiri 290 195 43 528 60 588 412 1000 367 247 54 668 76 744 522 1266 33 Sindhudurg 252 165 95 512 33 545 455 1000 77 50 29 156 10 166 139 304 34 Kolhapur 311 198 89 598 5 602 398 1000 1568 996 449 3013 23 3035 2004 5039 35 Sangli 248 199 90 537 22 559 441 1000 794 635 288 1716 69 1785 1410 3195 Maharashtra 208 295 66 569 14 583 417 1000 45479 64491 14396 124366 3039 127406 91246 218651

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 88: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

84

Table 21: Per thousand distribution of persons by usual activity category taking also into consideration the subsidiary economic status

of persons categorized 'not working' in the principal status.

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Urban Pooled Sample Female

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 all 11-21 31 41 &

51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 42 85 22 149 0 149 851 1000 28 57 15 100 0 100 572 672 2 Dhule 28 41 32 101 0 101 899 1000 44 65 50 159 0 159 1413 1572 3 Jalgaon 69 7 66 143 0 143 857 1000 265 26 253 545 0 545 3270 3814 4 Buldhana 77 14 82 173 0 173 827 1000 158 28 170 356 0 356 1702 2058 5 Akola 40 39 24 104 3 107 893 1000 100 98 61 259 8 267 2221 2488 6 Washim 38 10 72 120 0 120 880 1000 30 8 59 98 0 98 714 812 7 Amravati 29 40 23 92 0 92 908 1000 112 151 87 350 0 350 3468 3818 8 Wardha 46 40 82 168 16 184 816 1000 54 47 96 197 19 215 957 1173 9 Nagpur 59 52 35 146 15 161 839 1000 711 620 421 1751 178 1929 10068 11998

10 Bhandara 96 26 130 252 16 268 732 1000 56 15 77 149 9 158 432 590 11 Gondiya 39 21 65 125 20 145 855 1000 27 15 45 86 14 100 588 687 12 Gadchiroli 94 39 71 205 0 205 795 1000 30 12 23 66 0 66 255 320 13 Chandrapur 35 59 33 127 4 131 869 1000 103 172 97 371 12 384 2535 2919 14 Yavatmal 38 38 62 138 1 139 861 1000 90 89 146 324 1 326 2020 2346 15 Nanded 25 12 29 67 0 67 933 1000 85 42 97 224 0 224 3128 3352 16 Hingoli 82 21 26 129 25 154 846 1000 70 18 23 111 21 132 722 854 17 Parbhani 45 13 68 126 0 126 874 1000 101 30 151 282 0 282 1950 2233 18 Jalna 4 28 61 92 3 95 905 1000 6 45 99 150 5 155 1477 1631 19 Aurangabad 42 51 37 130 2 132 868 1000 255 305 220 781 14 795 5230 6025 20 Nashik 49 51 48 148 3 151 849 1000 347 358 338 1044 21 1065 6009 7073 21 Thane 45 100 7 153 12 164 836 1000 1477 3247 234 4957 374 5332 27148 32480 22 Mumbai 42 117 4 162 12 174 826 1000 2072 5730 175 7977 586 8564 40565 49129

Page 89: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

85

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 all 11-21 31 41 &

51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

24 Raigad 44 65 12 122 3 125 875 1000 137 201 38 376 10 386 2705 3092 25 Pune 57 75 15 148 5 153 847 1000 1324 1740 352 3416 110 3526 19580 23106 26 Ahmednagar 136 65 54 255 3 258 742 1000 506 244 202 952 10 961 2771 3732 27 Bid 25 45 5 76 19 94 906 1000 50 88 10 148 37 185 1775 1959 28 Latur 11 17 17 45 0 45 955 1000 26 40 42 108 0 108 2312 2420 29 Osmanabad 85 10 49 144 2 146 854 1000 87 10 50 148 3 150 878 1028 30 Solapur 90 93 53 237 0 237 763 1000 483 499 285 1268 0 1268 4090 5358 31 Satara 69 49 34 152 0 152 848 1000 154 109 75 337 0 337 1884 2221 32 Ratnagiri 98 75 7 181 9 189 811 1000 116 89 9 213 10 224 956 1180 33 Sindhudurg 27 63 14 105 0 105 895 1000 8 18 4 29 0 29 249 279 34 Kolhapur 69 43 20 133 5 138 862 1000 319 201 92 612 24 636 3978 4614 35 Sangli 56 29 44 128 2 130 870 1000 159 82 124 364 5 369 2469 2838

Maharashtra 51 76 22 149 8 157 843 1000 9591 14500 4216 28307 1470 29777 160093 189870

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 90: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

86

Table 21: Per thousand distribution of persons by usual activity category taking also into consideration the subsidiary economic status of persons categorized 'not working' in the principal status.

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Urban Pooled Sample Persons

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 all 11-21 31 41 &

51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 117 171 39 327 4 331 669 1000 181 263 60 503 6 509 1029 1538 2 Dhule 117 129 70 316 0 316 684 1000 406 449 242 1098 2 1099 2378 3477 3 Jalgaon 161 85 110 356 9 365 635 1000 1294 682 885 2861 72 2933 5092 8024 4 Buldhana 173 67 133 373 0 373 627 1000 693 268 533 1494 2 1496 2510 4006 5 Akola 146 119 62 326 19 345 655 1000 776 629 327 1732 99 1831 3479 5311 6 Washim 166 59 101 325 2 328 672 1000 278 99 169 547 4 550 1130 1680 7 Amravati 155 99 72 325 3 328 672 1000 1247 795 575 2618 25 2643 5405 8048 8 Wardha 121 128 105 354 14 368 632 1000 286 302 248 836 33 869 1492 2361 9 Nagpur 148 145 62 355 15 370 630 1000 3635 3561 1535 8730 360 9090 15503 24593

10 Bhandara 165 108 118 391 15 407 593 1000 197 128 141 465 18 483 705 1189 11 Gondiya 132 121 82 335 23 358 642 1000 193 177 119 489 33 522 937 1459 12 Gadchiroli 143 166 90 399 6 406 594 1000 89 102 56 247 4 251 367 618 13 Chandrapur 108 139 104 351 3 354 646 1000 596 771 574 1941 18 1959 3575 5534 14 Yavatmal 135 95 101 331 1 332 668 1000 660 465 493 1618 5 1622 3260 4882 15 Nanded 119 77 75 271 7 278 722 1000 819 530 518 1867 46 1914 4973 6887 16 Hingoli 172 95 89 357 13 370 630 1000 318 176 164 658 24 682 1164 1847 17 Parbhani 131 59 133 323 9 332 668 1000 583 265 594 1441 38 1479 2982 4461 18 Jalna 78 113 149 340 11 351 649 1000 273 395 521 1189 38 1228 2273 3500 19 Aurangabad 103 150 61 314 5 319 681 1000 1237 1803 733 3773 55 3828 8173 12002 20 Nashik 112 126 100 338 4 342 658 1000 1698 1915 1528 5142 68 5210 10013 15223 21 Thane 113 264 17 394 14 409 591 1000 8086 18977 1256 28319 1014 29333 42454 71787 22 Mumbai 144 256 14 414 13 427 573 1000 15881 28225 1563 45668 1461 47130 63242 110372 24 Raigad 119 229 31 379 7 385 615 1000 786 1511 204 2501 44 2545 4062 6607 25 Pune 119 207 36 362 10 373 627 1000 5940 10319 1782 18041 506 18547 31229 49776

Page 91: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

87

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 all 11-21 31 41 &

51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

26 Ahmednagar 189 105 91 385 20 405 595 1000 1516 846 729 3091 160 3251 4777 8028 27 Bid 108 109 68 285 20 306 694 1000 419 422 261 1102 79 1181 2683 3864 28 Latur 127 68 65 260 0 260 740 1000 652 351 333 1335 0 1335 3792 5127 29 Osmanabad 177 65 117 359 6 365 635 1000 376 137 247 760 13 773 1345 2118 30 Solapur 151 148 86 385 3 388 612 1000 1623 1589 926 4138 33 4171 6586 10757 31 Satara 195 111 53 359 7 365 635 1000 925 523 249 1697 32 1730 3003 4732 32 Ratnagiri 198 137 26 360 35 396 604 1000 483 336 63 882 86 968 1478 2446 33 Sindhudurg 144 116 56 317 17 334 666 1000 84 68 33 185 10 195 388 583 34 Kolhapur 196 124 56 375 5 380 620 1000 1887 1197 540 3624 47 3671 5982 9653 35 Sangli 158 119 68 345 12 357 643 1000 952 717 412 2080 74 2154 3879 6033

Maharashtra 135 193 46 374 11 385 615 1000 55070 78992 18613 152674 4509 157183 251339 408521

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 92: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

88

Table 21: Per thousand distribution of persons by usual activity category taking also into consideration the subsidiary economic status

of persons categorized 'not working' in the principal status.

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Combined Pooled Sample Male

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 all 11-21 31 41 &

51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 341 50 194 585 1 586 414 1000 1993 291 1136 3421 7 3427 2423 5851 2 Dhule 245 92 206 543 0 544 456 1000 2174 819 1828 4820 2 4822 4048 8870 3 Jalgaon 242 87 238 567 5 572 428 1000 4137 1480 4074 9692 90 9781 7307 17088 4 Buldhana 246 52 262 560 5 565 435 1000 3055 640 3251 6946 66 7013 5401 12413 5 Akola 195 93 288 576 15 592 408 1000 1453 697 2152 4303 116 4418 3047 7465 6 Washim 171 51 321 543 1 544 456 1000 989 298 1858 3146 4 3149 2643 5792 7 Amravati 277 64 249 589 3 592 408 1000 3482 803 3127 7412 33 7445 5134 12579 8 Wardha 225 106 241 573 3 576 424 1000 1131 534 1212 2877 14 2891 2129 5020 9 Nagpur 240 180 136 556 10 566 434 1000 4746 3560 2684 10990 199 11190 8578 19767

10 Bhandara 191 35 382 608 23 631 369 1000 1009 187 2015 3211 120 3331 1947 5278 11 Gondiya 300 79 211 590 22 612 388 1000 1742 457 1227 3426 128 3555 2253 5807 12 Gadchiroli 200 52 374 626 3 628 372 1000 941 244 1762 2947 12 2959 1751 4710 13 Chandrapur 240 92 308 640 1 641 359 1000 2291 873 2942 6107 6 6113 3428 9541 14 Yavatmal 221 67 283 571 1 572 428 1000 2988 911 3832 7732 14 7745 5795 13540 15 Nanded 302 58 145 506 3 509 491 1000 4320 834 2077 7232 47 7278 7027 14305 16 Hingoli 235 52 237 524 1 525 475 1000 1342 299 1351 2992 7 2999 2712 5710 17 Parbhani 341 37 180 558 9 567 433 1000 2589 281 1366 4236 65 4301 3288 7589 18 Jalna 251 74 223 548 4 552 448 1000 2350 692 2088 5130 34 5163 4196 9359 19 Aurangabad 232 121 195 548 6 554 446 1000 3869 2008 3247 9124 103 9227 7434 16661 20 Nashik 278 109 167 554 2 556 444 1000 5867 2303 3515 11685 50 11734 9353 21088 21 Thane 169 339 78 586 16 602 398 1000 8782 17653 4069 30504 844 31348 20739 52087 22 Mumbai 225 367 23 615 14 630 370 1000 13808 22495 1387 37691 875 38566 22677 61243 24 Raigad 202 207 149 558 11 569 431 1000 2289 2343 1683 6315 122 6437 4884 11321

Page 93: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

89

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 all 11-21 31 41 &

51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

25 Pune 224 243 107 574 15 589 411 1000 9445 10209 4517 24172 635 24806 17288 42095 26 Ahmednagar 257 63 161 481 14 494 506 1000 5678 1387 3556 10621 303 10925 11177 22102 27 Bid 353 44 183 579 3 583 417 1000 4345 542 2252 7139 43 7181 5139 12320 28 Latur 299 60 161 520 0 520 480 1000 3647 733 1966 6345 0 6345 5856 12202 29 Osmanabad 335 55 201 590 2 592 408 1000 2245 369 1345 3960 12 3972 2735 6707 30 Solapur 268 113 190 571 2 574 426 1000 4916 2069 3493 10478 45 10523 7825 18349 31 Satara 331 117 139 588 11 599 401 1000 4517 1599 1897 8014 146 8159 5467 13626 32 Ratnagiri 340 61 161 563 12 575 425 1000 2454 443 1165 4062 87 4150 3071 7220 33 Sindhudurg 340 41 203 584 20 603 397 1000 1384 165 825 2374 79 2454 1614 4068 34 Kolhapur 329 122 148 599 7 605 395 1000 5799 2149 2608 10557 120 10677 6958 17635 35 Sangli 331 108 121 560 6 566 434 1000 4582 1493 1680 7755 81 7836 6008 13844

Maharashtra 251 163 157 571 9 580 420 1000 126362 81861 79190 287413 4509 291922 211329 503251

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 94: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

90

Table 21: Per thousand distribution of persons by usual activity category taking also into consideration the subsidiary economic status of persons categorized 'not working' in the principal status.

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Combined Pooled Sample Female

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 all 11-21 31 41 &

51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 310 14 171 495 0 495 505 1000 1701 76 940 2717 0 2717 2769 5486 2 Dhule 174 19 175 368 0 368 632 1000 1318 147 1320 2785 0 2785 4775 7560 3 Jalgaon 145 5 219 369 0 369 631 1000 2385 87 3603 6076 5 6080 10391 16472 4 Buldhana 157 5 214 376 0 376 624 1000 1936 60 2643 4639 4 4643 7706 12350 5 Akola 29 18 164 212 4 216 784 1000 201 126 1118 1446 25 1471 5351 6822 6 Washim 26 4 192 223 0 223 777 1000 143 23 1056 1222 0 1222 4264 5487 7 Amravati 94 17 166 277 0 277 723 1000 1080 195 1912 3187 0 3187 8316 11503 8 Wardha 126 10 233 369 4 373 627 1000 672 56 1248 1976 21 1997 3359 5356 9 Nagpur 93 37 83 213 13 226 774 1000 1637 645 1449 3731 233 3964 13550 17513

10 Bhandara 82 7 300 389 4 393 607 1000 408 32 1497 1937 21 1958 3027 4985 11 Gondiya 219 29 191 439 6 445 555 1000 1205 158 1050 2413 34 2447 3052 5499 12 Gadchiroli 115 7 377 499 0 499 501 1000 553 36 1818 2407 0 2407 2421 4828 13 Chandrapur 72 20 237 329 1 330 670 1000 734 203 2418 3355 12 3367 6832 10198 14 Yavatmal 71 18 234 323 2 325 675 1000 859 218 2827 3904 19 3923 8148 12071 15 Nanded 86 4 130 220 2 222 778 1000 1132 56 1710 2899 33 2931 10253 13184 16 Hingoli 81 6 135 222 4 225 775 1000 471 34 793 1298 21 1319 4532 5851 17 Parbhani 165 5 133 304 0 304 696 1000 1284 38 1036 2358 0 2358 5408 7766 18 Jalna 152 5 174 331 1 332 668 1000 1329 45 1521 2895 5 2900 5835 8735 19 Aurangabad 109 22 104 235 1 236 764 1000 1634 323 1556 3513 16 3529 11450 14979 20 Nashik 128 31 125 284 1 285 715 1000 2485 599 2429 5513 21 5533 13878 19411 21 Thane 72 77 35 184 11 195 805 1000 3312 3543 1606 8461 490 8951 36916 45868 22 Mumbai 42 117 4 162 12 174 826 1000 2072 5730 175 7977 586 8564 40565 49129

Page 95: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

91

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

24 Raigad 136 28 78 241 1 242 758 1000 1490 308 853 2651 13 2664 8333 10996 25 Pune 137 48 60 245 3 248 752 1000 5208 1821 2293 9321 122 9444 28648 38092 26 Ahmednagar 184 19 187 391 2 393 607 1000 3395 357 3449 7201 28 7229 11177 18406 27 Bid 128 18 136 282 5 287 713 1000 1423 197 1507 3127 51 3178 7898 11076 28 Latur 53 7 101 161 0 161 839 1000 623 81 1186 1890 0 1890 9826 11716 29 Osmanabad 129 9 133 271 1 272 728 1000 864 59 886 1808 6 1815 4857 6672 30 Solapur 187 44 133 363 0 363 637 1000 3372 787 2389 6548 1 6549 11480 18029 31 Satara 248 26 91 365 4 370 630 1000 3151 334 1163 4648 51 4699 8018 12718 32 Ratnagiri 180 13 58 251 1 252 748 1000 1452 108 465 2025 11 2036 6040 8076 33 Sindhudurg 165 10 50 225 1 226 774 1000 606 35 184 824 3 827 2836 3663 34 Kolhapur 202 19 74 295 3 298 702 1000 3447 318 1264 5029 58 5087 11984 17071 35 Sangli 201 11 80 291 0 291 709 1000 2750 145 1092 3988 5 3992 9706 13699

Maharashtra 122 37 114 273 4 277 723 1000 56333 16978 52457 125768 1896 127664 333601 461265

Page 96: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

92

Table 21: Per thousand distribution of persons by usual activity category taking also into consideration the subsidiary economic status

of persons categorized 'not working' in the principal status.

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Combined Pooled Sample Persons

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(PS+SS) Estimated persons(00)(PS+SS)

11-21 31 41 & 51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 all 11-21 31 41 &

51 11-51 81 11-81 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 326 32 183 541 1 542 458 1000 3694 367 2076 6137 7 6144 5192 11336 2 Dhule 213 59 192 463 0 463 537 1000 3492 965 3148 7605 2 7607 8823 16430 3 Jalgaon 194 47 229 470 3 473 527 1000 6523 1567 7678 15767 94 15862 17698 33560 4 Buldhana 202 28 238 468 3 471 529 1000 4991 700 5894 11585 71 11656 13107 24763 5 Akola 116 58 229 402 10 412 588 1000 1654 823 3271 5748 141 5889 8398 14287 6 Washim 100 28 258 387 0 388 612 1000 1133 321 2914 4368 4 4372 6907 11278 7 Amravati 189 41 209 440 1 441 559 1000 4562 998 5039 10599 33 10632 13450 24083 8 Wardha 174 57 237 468 3 471 529 1000 1803 589 2461 4853 35 4889 5488 10376 9 Nagpur 171 113 111 395 12 406 594 1000 6383 4205 4133 14721 432 15153 22127 37281

10 Bhandara 138 21 342 502 14 515 485 1000 1416 220 3512 5148 141 5289 4974 10263 11 Gondiya 261 54 201 516 14 531 469 1000 2947 615 2278 5839 162 6001 5305 11306 12 Gadchiroli 157 29 375 561 1 563 437 1000 1495 280 3580 5354 12 5366 4172 9538 13 Chandrapur 153 55 272 479 1 480 520 1000 3025 1076 5360 9461 18 9479 10260 19739 14 Yavatmal 150 44 260 454 1 456 544 1000 3848 1129 6659 11636 33 11668 13943 25611 15 Nanded 198 32 138 369 3 371 629 1000 5452 890 3788 10130 80 10210 17280 27489 16 Hingoli 157 29 185 371 2 373 627 1000 1814 333 2143 4290 28 4318 7244 11561 17 Parbhani 252 21 156 429 4 434 566 1000 3872 320 2402 6594 65 6659 8696 15355 18 Jalna 203 41 199 444 2 446 554 1000 3679 737 3609 8025 38 8063 10031 18094 19 Aurangabad 174 74 152 399 4 403 597 1000 5503 2331 4803 12637 120 12756 18884 31640 20 Nashik 206 72 147 425 2 426 574 1000 8352 2902 5944 17198 70 17268 23231 40499 21 Thane 123 216 58 398 14 411 589 1000 12095 21196 5675 38965 1334 40299 57656 97955 22 Mumbai 144 256 14 414 13 427 573 1000 15881 28225 1563 45668 1461 47130 63242 110372

Page 97: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

93

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

24 Raigad 169 119 114 402 6 408 592 1000 3779 2651 2536 8966 135 9101 13216 22317 25 Pune 183 150 85 418 9 427 573 1000 14653 12030 6810 33493 757 34250 45936 80186 26 Ahmednagar 224 43 173 440 8 448 552 1000 9073 1745 7005 17822 331 18154 22355 40508 27 Bid 247 32 161 439 4 443 557 1000 5768 738 3759 10265 94 10359 13037 23396 28 Latur 179 34 132 344 0 344 656 1000 4270 814 3152 8235 0 8235 15682 23917 29 Osmanabad 232 32 167 431 1 433 567 1000 3109 428 2231 5768 18 5787 7592 13378 30 Solapur 228 79 162 468 1 469 531 1000 8288 2856 5882 17026 47 17073 19305 36378 31 Satara 291 73 116 481 7 488 512 1000 7668 1933 3061 12662 197 12859 13485 26344 32 Ratnagiri 255 36 107 398 6 404 596 1000 3906 551 1630 6087 99 6186 9111 15296 33 Sindhudurg 257 26 131 414 11 424 576 1000 1990 200 1009 3199 82 3281 4450 7730 34 Kolhapur 266 71 112 449 5 454 546 1000 9247 2467 3872 15586 178 15764 18942 34706 35 Sangli 266 59 101 426 3 429 571 1000 7332 1638 2773 11743 85 11828 15715 27543

Maharashtra 189 102 136 428 7 435 565 1000 182695 98840 131647 413182 6404 419586 544931 964517

Page 98: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

94

Table 34: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current weekly activity

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Rural Pooled sample Male

District code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-

72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 350 17 187 553 20 574 426 1000 1745 86 931 2758 97 2859 2126 4985 2 Dhule 258 60 219 538 0 538 462 1000 1795 421 1528 3744 0 3744 3220 6964 3 Jalgaon 226 66 266 556 3 561 439 1000 2911 855 3419 7159 38 7224 5654 12878 4 Buldhana 208 38 297 538 19 562 438 1000 2176 400 3106 5631 197 5880 4585 10465 5 Akola 170 36 397 602 5 607 393 1000 788 166 1841 2794 25 2819 1823 4642 6 Washim 162 42 332 536 17 553 447 1000 795 207 1636 2638 86 2724 2199 4923 7 Amravati 310 19 287 612 1 617 383 1000 2589 156 2396 5113 8 5150 3199 8350 8 Wardha 232 73 278 583 1 584 416 1000 889 278 1065 2232 5 2237 1595 3832 9 Nagpur 247 85 223 553 7 562 438 1000 1772 608 1596 3967 53 4029 3143 7172

10 Bhandara 227 16 351 592 48 642 358 1000 1063 75 1642 2771 227 3006 1674 4679 11 Gondiya 301 45 221 551 40 607 393 1000 1514 226 1115 2772 199 3055 1981 5035 12 Gadchiroli 211 30 386 625 2 629 371 1000 931 133 1702 2759 8 2774 1639 4413 13 Chandrapur 243 40 359 641 13 655 345 1000 1683 274 2489 4438 92 4537 2389 6926 14 Yavatmal 196 48 340 582 2 586 414 1000 2161 523 3743 6401 22 6449 4556 11005 15 Nanded 338 32 148 518 0 518 482 1000 3638 348 1589 5575 3 5578 5192 10770 16 Hingoli 233 30 254 517 1 518 482 1000 1101 142 1198 2440 4 2444 2273 4717 17 Parbhani 393 9 163 565 12 577 423 1000 2106 49 874 3029 63 3092 2269 5361 18 Jalna 264 47 228 539 0 539 461 1000 1977 352 1708 4037 1 4039 3451 7490 19 Aurangabad 270 48 255 563 6 580 420 1000 2889 518 2723 6012 63 6194 4491 10685 20 Nashik 346 56 181 582 0 583 417 1000 4471 725 2340 7535 2 7538 5400 12938

Page 99: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

95

District code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-

72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

21 Thane 206 149 184 536 27 567 433 1000 2636 1909 2346 6845 351 7241 5539 12780 24 Raigad 223 139 141 496 39 543 457 1000 1742 1087 1102 3875 304 4235 3571 7806 25 Pune 321 104 178 602 31 634 366 1000 4950 1609 2749 9284 476 9784 5640 15424 26 Ahmednagar 261 44 161 466 15 482 518 1000 4652 786 2861 8293 275 8574 9232 17806 27 Bid 413 20 154 587 0 587 413 1000 4304 207 1600 6112 0 6112 4304 10416 28 Latur 318 45 176 539 0 539 461 1000 3021 423 1675 5119 0 5119 4376 9494 29 Osmanabad 348 43 204 596 1 597 403 1000 1955 244 1148 3347 6 3353 2264 5617 30 Solapur 290 75 219 578 2 587 413 1000 3755 977 2837 7488 32 7601 5349 12950 31 Satara 314 106 145 563 19 583 417 1000 3488 1174 1611 6258 206 6479 4636 11115 32 Ratnagiri 351 33 185 568 2 570 430 1000 2087 197 1099 3383 11 3394 2560 5954 33 Sindhudurg 345 31 212 587 20 607 393 1000 1298 115 796 2209 77 2286 1478 3763 34 Kolhapur 334 95 156 585 10 596 404 1000 4210 1198 1970 7371 127 7504 5091 12596 35 Sangli 391 80 114 585 1 587 413 1000 4163 856 1214 6232 16 6248 4401 10649 Maharashtra 286 61 217 561 11 574 426 1000 81258 17321 61647 159621 3075 2E+05 121299 284600

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 100: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

96

Table 34: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current weekly activity STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Rural Pooled sample Female

District code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all 11-21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 313 4 151 467 37 505 495 1000 1509 19 726 2250 179 2433 2381 4814 2 Dhule 143 19 217 378 0 378 622 1000 854 111 1301 2266 0 2266 3723 5989 3 Jalgaon 145 5 247 395 8 404 596 1000 1831 61 3127 5004 100 5119 7538 12657 4 Buldhana 90 3 225 312 1 319 681 1000 927 31 2320 3206 7 3286 7006 10292 5 Akola 14 7 258 280 4 284 716 1000 62 32 1120 1214 17 1231 3103 4334 6 Washim 31 3 207 241 0 241 759 1000 143 15 967 1125 0 1125 3550 4675 7 Amravati 127 6 225 355 3 361 639 1000 972 44 1730 2727 26 2772 4913 7685 8 Wardha 147 2 255 403 1 405 595 1000 616 9 1067 1687 2 1695 2489 4183 9 Nagpur 141 5 192 327 15 353 647 1000 775 25 1061 1802 85 1946 3570 5516

10 Bhandara 114 4 216 334 42 376 624 1000 502 17 950 1466 184 1652 2743 4395 11 Gondiya 220 30 204 449 3 457 543 1000 1056 143 984 2161 17 2200 2612 4812 12 Gadchiroli 106 5 366 478 0 478 522 1000 477 24 1652 2153 0 2153 2355 4508 13 Chandrapur 94 4 294 392 0 392 608 1000 683 31 2137 2851 0 2851 4429 7280 14 Yavatmal 79 13 276 360 0 368 632 1000 764 128 2685 3501 1 3579 6147 9725 15 Nanded 109 1 159 269 3 273 727 1000 1071 14 1563 2648 33 2681 7152 9832 16 Hingoli 60 3 174 237 0 237 763 1000 298 16 871 1183 0 1184 3813 4997 17 Parbhani 204 1 157 361 7 368 632 1000 1127 6 866 1999 36 2035 3497 5533 18 Jalna 176 0 200 376 0 376 624 1000 1251 0 1420 2670 0 2670 4434 7104 19 Aurangabad 162 2 115 278 0 279 721 1000 1453 18 1026 2486 2 2499 6455 8953 20 Nashik 178 20 170 367 0 367 633 1000 2197 241 2093 4531 0 4531 7807 12338 21 Thane 122 22 75 209 19 238 762 1000 1636 296 1003 2801 249 3185 10204 13388

Page 101: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

97

District code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all 11-21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

24 Raigad 139 14 58 210 20 231 769 1000 1098 107 457 1661 161 1822 6082 7905 25 Pune 251 7 105 362 26 389 611 1000 3766 100 1577 5427 387 5831 9155 14986 26 Ahmednagar 194 8 199 400 12 412 588 1000 2841 113 2927 5877 170 6051 8624 14674 27 Bid 151 12 134 296 2 298 702 1000 1373 109 1218 2700 15 2715 6402 9116 28 Latur 68 4 121 193 2 195 805 1000 628 41 1126 1794 18 1812 7484 9296 29 Osmanabad 147 9 117 272 0 272 728 1000 827 48 659 1533 1 1536 4107 5643 30 Solapur 227 23 153 383 1 404 596 1000 2881 287 1944 4859 13 5125 7546 12671 31 Satara 213 21 99 333 5 338 662 1000 2233 225 1039 3492 53 3549 6948 10497 32 Ratnagiri 192 3 66 261 0 261 739 1000 1321 23 456 1801 1 1802 5094 6896 33 Sindhudurg 171 5 53 229 1 230 770 1000 579 17 180 774 3 779 2605 3384 34 Kolhapur 226 9 85 319 5 325 675 1000 2815 117 1055 3973 58 4045 8413 12457 35 Sangli 236 6 77 316 0 319 681 1000 2561 63 832 3427 4 3460 7400 10861 Maharashtra 159 9 163 328 7 338 662 1000 43128 2531 44136 89051 1822 91617 179778 271395

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 102: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

98

Table 34: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current weekly activity STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Rural Pooled sample Persons

District code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-

72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,62 31,71,7

2 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 332 11 169 511 28 540 460 1000 3254 104 1656 5009 276 5291 4507 9798 2 Dhule 205 41 218 464 0 464 536 1000 2650 532 2829 6010 0 6010 6943 12953 3 Jalgaon 186 36 256 476 5 483 517 1000 4742 916 6546 12163 138 12343 13192 25535 4 Buldhana 150 21 261 426 10 442 558 1000 3104 432 5427 8837 204 9166 11591 20757 5 Akola 95 22 330 447 5 451 549 1000 850 197 2961 4008 42 4050 4926 8976 6 Washim 98 23 271 392 9 401 599 1000 938 222 2603 3763 86 3849 5750 9598 7 Amravati 222 12 257 489 2 494 506 1000 3562 200 4126 7840 34 7922 8112 16035 8 Wardha 188 36 266 489 1 491 509 1000 1506 287 2132 3919 7 3932 4083 8015 9 Nagpur 201 50 209 455 11 471 529 1000 2548 633 2657 5770 138 5976 6712 12688

10 Bhandara 172 10 286 467 45 513 487 1000 1564 92 2591 4237 410 4658 4416 9074 11 Gondiya 261 38 213 501 22 534 466 1000 2570 370 2098 4934 216 5255 4593 9847 12 Gadchiroli 158 18 376 551 1 552 448 1000 1408 156 3354 4912 8 4927 3994 8921 13 Chandrapur 166 21 326 513 6 520 480 1000 2365 305 4626 7289 92 7387 6818 14205 14 Yavatmal 141 31 310 478 1 484 516 1000 2925 651 6428 9902 23 10027 10702 20730 15 Nanded 229 18 153 399 2 401 599 1000 4708 362 3152 8223 36 8259 12344 20602 16 Hingoli 144 16 213 373 0 374 626 1000 1399 157 2068 3624 4 3628 6086 9714 17 Parbhani 297 5 160 462 9 471 529 1000 3233 55 1740 5028 99 5127 5766 10893 18 Jalna 221 24 214 460 0 460 540 1000 3228 352 3128 6708 1 6709 7885 14594 19 Aurangabad 221 27 191 433 3 443 557 1000 4342 536 3750 8497 66 8693 10946 19638 20 Nashik 264 38 175 477 0 477 523 1000 6668 966 4432 12066 2 12069 13207 25276 21 Thane 163 84 128 369 23 398 602 1000 4272 2205 3348 9646 600 10426 15742 26168 24 Raigad 181 76 99 352 30 386 614 1000 2840 1194 1559 5536 464 6057 9653 15710

Page 103: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

99

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

25 Pune 287 56 142 484 28 513 487 1000 8716 1709 4326 14711 863 15615 14795 30410 26 Ahmednagar 231 28 178 436 14 450 550 1000 7494 899 5788 14170 445 14625 17856 32481 27 Bid 291 16 144 451 1 452 548 1000 5677 316 2819 8811 15 8826 10706 19532 28 Latur 194 25 149 368 1 369 631 1000 3648 463 2801 6913 18 6931 11859 18790 29 Osmanabad 247 26 160 433 1 434 566 1000 2782 292 1806 4880 7 4889 6371 11260 30 Solapur 259 49 187 482 2 497 503 1000 6636 1264 4781 12347 45 12726 12895 25621 31 Satara 265 65 123 451 12 464 536 1000 5720 1399 2650 9750 259 10029 11583 21612 32 Ratnagiri 265 17 121 403 1 404 596 1000 3408 220 1555 5184 13 5196 7654 12850 33 Sindhudurg 263 18 137 417 11 429 571 1000 1877 132 976 2983 79 3064 4083 7147 34 Kolhapur 280 52 121 453 7 461 539 1000 7025 1315 3024 11345 185 11549 13504 25053 35 Sangli 313 43 95 449 1 451 549 1000 6724 919 2046 9659 20 9708 11801 21510 Maharashtra 224 36 190 447 9 458 542 1000 124386 19852 105783 248672 4897 254918 301077 555995

Page 104: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

100

Table 34: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current weekly activity

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Urban Pooled Sample Male

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62

31,71,72

41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all 11-

21,61,6231,71,

72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 176 229 52 458 7 465 535 1000 153 199 45 396 6 402 464 866 2 Dhule 191 198 81 470 24 493 507 1000 365 377 153 895 45 940 965 1905 3 Jalgaon 244 156 149 549 18 567 433 1000 1029 655 628 2312 76 2388 1822 4210 4 Buldhana 255 123 188 564 17 582 418 1000 497 239 366 1100 32 1135 813 1948 5 Akola 230 189 100 514 35 554 446 1000 649 533 283 1450 100 1564 1258 2823 6 Washim 277 107 120 505 12 517 483 1000 241 93 105 439 10 449 420 869 7 Amravati 269 152 112 534 9 542 458 1000 1138 644 475 2257 37 2294 1935 4230 8 Wardha 188 210 124 523 23 546 454 1000 224 250 148 621 27 649 540 1188 9 Nagpur 227 233 88 545 18 567 433 1000 2861 2934 1111 6865 232 7138 5457 12595

10 Bhandara 236 187 104 527 15 542 458 1000 142 112 62 316 9 325 274 599 11 Gondiya 217 211 93 512 26 547 453 1000 168 163 72 395 20 423 349 772 12 Gadchiroli 196 303 111 609 13 622 378 1000 58 90 33 181 4 185 112 297 13 Chandrapur 182 247 164 593 7 600 400 1000 476 646 428 1550 18 1569 1046 2615 14 Yavatmal 225 148 137 504 1 511 489 1000 570 376 348 1278 3 1296 1239 2535 15 Nanded 202 138 119 460 13 473 527 1000 715 488 421 1625 46 1671 1864 3535 16 Hingoli 251 153 143 547 8 555 445 1000 249 152 142 543 8 551 442 993 17 Parbhani 213 102 175 487 51 541 459 1000 474 227 390 1084 113 1205 1024 2228 18 Jalna 143 185 226 554 20 573 427 1000 266 347 422 1035 36 1072 797 1869 19 Aurangabad 161 256 64 481 27 508 492 1000 961 1529 385 2874 159 3033 2943 5976 20 Nashik 164 191 144 498 9 507 493 1000 1337 1557 1170 4061 72 4136 4014 8150 21 Thane 168 400 26 594 18 612 388 1000 6610 15727 1014 23348 699 24050 15257 39307 22 Mumbai 228 360 23 605 18 629 371 1000 13982 22031 1426 37066 1103 38542 22701 61243 24 Raigad 186 370 46 602 11 613 387 1000 655 1299 163 2117 37 2154 1361 3515

Page 105: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

101

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62

31,71,72

41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all 11-

21,61,6231,71,

72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

25 Pune 169 324 49 541 22 564 436 1000 4509 8634 1309 14436 583 15035 11635 26671 26 Ahmednagar 232 138 122 492 39 531 469 1000 997 594 523 2114 166 2280 2015 4295 27 Bid 197 172 105 474 47 521 479 1000 375 328 199 903 90 993 912 1904 28 Latur 233 116 101 446 3 453 547 1000 632 313 273 1209 9 1227 1481 2707 29 Osmanabad 265 108 189 562 10 571 429 1000 289 118 206 612 10 623 467 1090 30 Solapur 218 194 112 514 11 535 465 1000 1179 1047 605 2773 59 2890 2509 5399 31 Satara 302 164 67 534 17 551 449 1000 760 413 168 1341 42 1384 1128 2511 32 Ratnagiri 290 195 43 528 60 588 412 1000 367 247 54 668 76 744 522 1266 33 Sindhudurg 252 165 95 512 24 536 464 1000 77 50 29 156 7 163 141 304 34 Kolhapur 311 198 85 594 5 599 401 1000 1568 996 430 2991 23 3017 2023 5039 35 Sangli 248 199 90 537 22 559 441 1000 794 635 288 1716 69 1785 1410 3195

Maharashtra 207 293 63 561 18 582 418 1000 45364 64043 13873 122728 4031 127311 91340 218651

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 106: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

102

Table 34: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current weekly activity STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Urban Pooled Sample Female

District

code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-

72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,6231,71,7

2 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 35 85 22 142 0 142 858 1000 23 57 15 95 0 95 576 672 2 Dhule 24 41 25 90 7 98 902 1000 38 65 39 142 12 153 1418 1572 3 Jalgaon 61 7 50 118 2 120 880 1000 232 27 192 451 6 458 3357 3814 4 Buldhana 61 14 93 169 0 169 831 1000 126 28 192 347 0 347 1711 2058 5 Akola 39 39 24 102 3 106 894 1000 96 98 61 255 8 263 2225 2488 6 Washim 41 10 61 112 6 118 882 1000 33 8 49 91 5 96 716 812 7 Amravati 29 39 21 89 0 89 911 1000 112 147 82 341 0 341 3478 3818 8 Wardha 42 43 67 147 16 167 833 1000 49 50 78 172 19 196 977 1173 9 Nagpur 53 52 33 138 18 156 844 1000 638 625 391 1655 213 1867 10131 11998

10 Bhandara 96 26 136 256 24 282 718 1000 56 15 80 151 14 166 423 590 11 Gondiya 33 21 65 119 20 139 861 1000 22 15 45 82 14 95 592 687 12 Gadchiroli 89 39 53 180 0 180 820 1000 28 12 17 58 0 58 262 320 13 Chandrapur 31 59 33 123 4 127 873 1000 92 172 97 359 12 372 2547 2919 14 Yavatmal 38 38 58 134 3 137 863 1000 90 89 135 314 6 320 2026 2346 15 Nanded 29 12 29 70 3 72 928 1000 96 40 98 234 9 243 3109 3352 16 Hingoli 84 21 18 115 25 148 852 1000 72 18 16 98 21 127 728 854 17 Parbhani 44 13 32 89 0 90 910 1000 98 30 71 200 1 200 2032 2233 18 Jalna 5 26 61 92 3 95 905 1000 9 43 99 150 5 155 1477 1631 19 Aurangabad 31 51 26 108 14 122 878 1000 187 305 156 649 84 733 5292 6025 20 Nashik 48 50 48 145 3 148 852 1000 339 351 338 1028 21 1049 6024 7073 21 Thane 43 99 7 149 12 162 838 1000 1402 3217 234 4853 394 5247 27233 32480

Page 107: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

103

District

code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-

72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,6231,71,7

2 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

22 Mumbai 41 116 4 160 15 175 825 1000 1998 5683 175 7845 742 8597 40531 49129 24 Raigad 44 65 12 122 3 125 875 1000 137 201 38 376 10 386 2705 3092 25 Pune 53 76 11 139 6 145 855 1000 1225 1748 247 3220 140 3360 19746 23106 26 Ahmednagar 132 65 53 250 3 252 748 1000 491 244 197 932 10 942 2790 3732 27 Bid 19 45 5 69 19 87 913 1000 36 88 10 135 37 171 1788 1959 28 Latur 11 17 17 45 0 45 955 1000 26 40 42 108 0 108 2312 2420 29 Osmanabad 85 10 49 133 2 146 854 1000 87 10 50 137 3 150 878 1028 30 Solapur 87 92 52 227 2 233 767 1000 465 495 278 1218 9 1247 4111 5358 31 Satara 64 49 34 147 0 147 853 1000 142 109 75 326 0 326 1895 2221 32 Ratnagiri 98 75 7 181 9 189 811 1000 116 89 9 213 10 224 956 1180 33 Sindhudurg 27 63 14 105 0 105 895 1000 8 18 4 29 0 29 249 279 34 Kolhapur 66 43 20 129 5 135 865 1000 306 200 91 597 24 621 3993 4614 35 Sangli 56 29 44 128 2 130 870 1000 159 82 124 364 5 369 2469 2838

Maharashtra 48 76 20 143 10 153 847 1000 9036 14422 3824 27225 1831 29113 160757 189870

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 108: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

104

Table 34: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current weekly activity STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector =Urban Pooled Sample Persons

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-

72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 114 166 39 320 4 324 676 1000 176 256 60 491 6 498 1040 1538 2 Dhule 116 127 55 298 16 315 685 1000 403 442 192 1037 57 1094 2383 3477 3 Jalgaon 157 85 102 344 10 355 645 1000 1261 682 820 2763 82 2846 5179 8024 4 Buldhana 156 67 139 361 8 370 630 1000 623 268 558 1447 32 1482 2524 4006 5 Akola 140 119 65 321 20 344 656 1000 745 631 344 1705 108 1828 3483 5311 6 Washim 163 61 92 315 9 324 676 1000 274 102 154 530 15 545 1135 1680 7 Amravati 155 98 69 323 5 327 673 1000 1250 791 557 2598 37 2635 5413 8048 8 Wardha 116 127 96 336 19 358 642 1000 273 300 226 793 46 845 1516 2361 9 Nagpur 142 145 61 346 18 366 634 1000 3499 3560 1502 8520 445 9006 15587 24593

10 Bhandara 167 107 120 392 20 413 587 1000 198 127 143 466 23 491 698 1189 11 Gondiya 130 121 80 327 23 355 645 1000 190 177 117 477 34 518 941 1459 12 Gadchiroli 140 166 81 387 6 393 607 1000 87 102 50 239 4 243 375 618 13 Chandrapur 103 148 95 345 6 351 649 1000 567 818 525 1909 31 1941 3593 5534 14 Yavatmal 135 95 99 326 2 331 669 1000 660 465 483 1592 10 1617 3265 4882 15 Nanded 118 77 75 270 8 278 722 1000 811 528 519 1859 55 1914 4973 6887 16 Hingoli 173 92 85 347 16 367 633 1000 320 171 157 641 29 677 1169 1847 17 Parbhani 128 58 103 288 25 315 685 1000 573 257 461 1284 114 1405 3056 4461 18 Jalna 79 111 149 339 12 350 650 1000 275 389 521 1185 41 1227 2274 3500 19 Aurangabad 96 153 45 294 20 314 686 1000 1149 1834 541 3523 243 3766 8235 12002

Page 109: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

105

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

20 Nashik 110 125 99 334 6 341 659 1000 1676 1908 1508 5090 93 5185 10038 15223 21 Thane 112 264 17 393 15 408 592 1000 8012 18944 1248 28200 1093 29297 42490 71787 22 Mumbai 145 251 15 407 17 427 573 1000 15980 27714 1601 44910 1845 47139 63232 110372 24 Raigad 120 227 30 377 7 384 616 1000 792 1500 201 2493 47 2540 4067 6607 25 Pune 115 209 31 355 15 370 630 1000 5733 10382 1556 17656 723 18396 31381 49776 26 Ahmednagar 185 104 90 379 22 401 599 1000 1489 838 719 3046 176 3222 4805 8028 27 Bid 106 108 54 269 33 301 699 1000 411 416 210 1037 126 1164 2700 3864 28 Latur 128 69 61 257 2 260 740 1000 658 353 315 1317 9 1335 3792 5127 29 Osmanabad 177 61 121 354 6 365 635 1000 376 128 256 749 13 773 1345 2118 30 Solapur 153 143 82 371 6 385 615 1000 1644 1542 883 3992 68 4137 6620 10757 31 Satara 191 110 51 352 9 361 639 1000 902 522 243 1667 42 1710 3023 4732 32 Ratnagiri 198 137 26 360 35 396 604 1000 483 336 63 882 86 968 1478 2446 33 Sindhudurg 144 116 56 317 12 330 670 1000 84 68 33 185 7 192 391 583 34 Kolhapur 194 124 54 372 5 377 623 1000 1874 1196 520 3588 47 3637 6016 9653 35 Sangli 158 119 68 345 12 357 643 1000 952 717 412 2080 74 2154 3879 6033

Maharashtra 133 192 43 367 14 383 617 1000 54400 78465 17697 149953 5862 156424 252098 408521

Page 110: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

106

Table 34: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current weekly activity

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Combined Pooled Sample Male

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-

72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 324 49 167 539 18 557 443 1000 1898 284 976 3154 103 3261 2589 5851 2 Dhule 244 90 190 523 5 528 472 1000 2160 798 1681 4639 45 4684 4185 8870 3 Jalgaon 231 88 237 554 7 562 438 1000 3940 1511 4047 9471 114 9612 7476 17088 4 Buldhana 215 52 280 542 18 565 435 1000 2674 640 3472 6731 229 7015 5398 12413 5 Akola 192 94 285 569 17 587 413 1000 1436 699 2124 4244 125 4384 3081 7465 6 Washim 179 52 300 531 17 548 452 1000 1036 301 1740 3077 97 3173 2619 5792 7 Amravati 296 64 228 586 4 592 408 1000 3728 800 2871 7370 46 7445 5134 12579 8 Wardha 222 105 241 568 6 575 425 1000 1113 528 1212 2854 32 2886 2134 5020 9 Nagpur 234 179 137 548 14 565 435 1000 4634 3542 2707 10832 285 11168 8599 19767

10 Bhandara 228 35 323 585 45 631 369 1000 1204 186 1704 3086 236 3330 1948 5278 11 Gondiya 290 67 204 545 38 599 401 1000 1682 389 1187 3167 220 3477 2330 5807 12 Gadchiroli 210 47 368 624 3 628 372 1000 990 223 1735 2941 12 2959 1751 4710 13 Chandrapur 226 96 306 628 12 640 360 1000 2158 920 2917 5988 110 6105 3435 9541 14 Yavatmal 202 66 302 567 2 572 428 1000 2730 899 4091 7679 26 7745 5795 13540 15 Nanded 304 58 141 503 3 507 493 1000 4353 836 2011 7200 49 7249 7056 14305 16 Hingoli 236 52 235 522 2 524 476 1000 1350 294 1339 2983 12 2995 2715 5710 17 Parbhani 340 36 167 542 23 566 434 1000 2580 276 1264 4113 176 4296 3293 7589 18 Jalna 240 75 228 542 4 546 454 1000 2244 698 2130 5073 38 5110 4248 9359 19 Aurangabad 231 123 187 533 13 554 446 1000 3850 2047 3108 8886 222 9227 7434 16661 20 Nashik 275 108 166 550 4 554 446 1000 5807 2282 3509 11597 74 11673 9415 21088 21 Thane 178 339 64 580 20 601 399 1000 9246 17635 3360 30192 1050 31291 20796 52087

Page 111: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

107

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-

72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

22 Mumbai 228 360 23 605 18 629 371 1000 13982 22031 1426 37066 1103 38542 22701 61243 24 Raigad 212 211 112 529 30 564 436 1000 2397 2386 1265 5992 341 6389 4932 11321 25 Pune 225 243 96 563 25 590 410 1000 9459 10243 4058 23720 1059 24819 17276 42095 26 Ahmednagar 256 62 153 471 20 491 509 1000 5649 1380 3384 10407 442 10855 11247 22102 27 Bid 380 43 146 569 7 577 423 1000 4679 536 1800 7014 90 7104 5216 12320 28 Latur 299 60 160 519 1 520 480 1000 3653 736 1948 6327 9 6345 5856 12202 29 Osmanabad 335 54 202 590 2 593 407 1000 2243 362 1353 3959 17 3975 2731 6707 30 Solapur 269 110 188 559 5 572 428 1000 4934 2024 3442 10261 91 10491 7858 18349 31 Satara 312 116 131 558 18 577 423 1000 4248 1587 1780 7599 248 7863 5763 13626 32 Ratnagiri 340 61 160 561 12 573 427 1000 2454 443 1153 4051 87 4138 3082 7220 33 Sindhudurg 338 41 203 581 21 602 398 1000 1375 165 825 2365 84 2449 1619 4068 34 Kolhapur 328 124 136 588 8 597 403 1000 5778 2194 2399 10362 149 10521 7114 17635 35 Sangli 358 108 108 574 6 580 420 1000 4957 1490 1501 7948 85 8033 5811 13844

Maharashtra 252 162 150 561 14 577 423 1000 126622 81364 75520 282349 7106 290611 212640 503251

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 112: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

108

Table 34: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current weekly activity STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Combined Pooled Sample Female

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-

72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 279 14 135 428 33 461 539 1000 1532 76 741 2346 179 2528 2958 5486 2 Dhule 118 23 177 319 2 320 680 1000 893 176 1339 2408 12 2420 5141 7560 3 Jalgaon 125 5 202 331 6 339 661 1000 2063 88 3319 5455 107 5577 10895 16472 4 Buldhana 85 5 203 288 1 294 706 1000 1054 60 2513 3553 7 3633 8717 12350 5 Akola 23 19 173 215 4 219 781 1000 158 130 1181 1469 25 1494 5327 6822 6 Washim 32 4 185 222 1 222 778 1000 176 23 1016 1216 5 1220 4266 5487 7 Amravati 94 17 158 267 2 271 729 1000 1084 191 1812 3068 26 3113 8391 11503 8 Wardha 124 11 214 347 4 353 647 1000 666 59 1145 1859 21 1891 3465 5356 9 Nagpur 81 37 83 197 17 218 782 1000 1413 651 1452 3457 298 3813 13700 17513

10 Bhandara 112 7 207 324 40 365 635 1000 558 32 1030 1617 198 1818 3166 4985 11 Gondiya 196 29 187 408 6 417 583 1000 1079 158 1028 2243 30 2295 3204 5499 12 Gadchiroli 105 7 346 458 0 458 542 1000 506 36 1669 2211 0 2211 2617 4828 13 Chandrapur 76 20 219 315 1 316 684 1000 774 203 2234 3210 12 3223 6976 10198 14 Yavatmal 71 18 234 316 1 323 677 1000 855 217 2820 3815 7 3899 8173 12071 15 Nanded 88 4 126 219 3 222 778 1000 1166 55 1661 2882 41 2923 10261 13184 16 Hingoli 63 6 151 219 4 224 776 1000 370 34 886 1282 21 1311 4540 5851 17 Parbhani 158 5 121 283 5 288 712 1000 1226 36 937 2199 37 2236 5530 7766 18 Jalna 144 5 174 323 1 323 677 1000 1259 43 1518 2820 5 2825 5910 8735 19 Aurangabad 109 22 79 209 6 216 784 1000 1640 323 1183 3135 86 3232 11747 14979 20 Nashik 131 31 125 286 1 287 713 1000 2536 592 2431 5560 21 5581 13831 19411 21 Thane 66 77 27 167 14 184 816 1000 3038 3514 1237 7654 643 8431 37436 45868 22 Mumbai 41 116 4 160 15 175 825 1000 1998 5683 175 7845 742 8597 40531 49129

Page 113: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

109

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-

72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

24 Raigad 112 28 45 185 16 201 799 1000 1235 308 494 2037 171 2209 8788 10996 25 Pune 131 49 48 227 14 241 759 1000 4991 1848 1824 8647 528 9191 28900 38092 26 Ahmednagar 181 19 170 370 10 380 620 1000 3333 357 3123 6809 179 6993 11414 18406 27 Bid 127 18 111 256 5 261 739 1000 1409 197 1229 2834 51 2886 8190 11076 28 Latur 56 7 100 162 2 164 836 1000 654 81 1168 1902 18 1920 9795 11716 29 Osmanabad 137 9 106 250 1 253 747 1000 915 59 709 1670 4 1686 4985 6672 30 Solapur 186 43 123 337 1 353 647 1000 3346 782 2222 6077 22 6372 11658 18029 31 Satara 187 26 88 300 4 305 695 1000 2375 334 1113 3818 53 3875 8843 12718 32 Ratnagiri 178 14 58 249 1 251 749 1000 1437 112 465 2014 11 2026 6051 8076 33 Sindhudurg 160 10 50 219 1 221 779 1000 586 35 184 803 3 808 2855 3663 34 Kolhapur 183 19 67 268 5 273 727 1000 3121 317 1145 4570 82 4665 12406 17071 35 Sangli 199 11 70 277 1 280 720 1000 2719 145 956 3791 9 3829 9869 13699

Maharashtra 113 37 104 252 8 262 738 1000 52163 16953 47960 116276 3653 120730 340535 461265

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 114: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

110

Table 34: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current weekly activity STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Combined Pooled Sample Persons

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-

72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 303 32 151 485 25 511 489 1000 3430 360 1716 5500 283 5789 5547 11336 2 Dhule 186 59 184 429 3 432 568 1000 3052 974 3021 7047 57 7104 9326 16430 3 Jalgaon 179 48 219 445 7 453 547 1000 6003 1599 7366 14926 221 15188 18371 33560 4 Buldhana 151 28 242 415 10 430 570 1000 3727 700 5985 10284 236 10648 14115 24763 5 Akola 112 58 231 400 11 411 589 1000 1595 828 3305 5713 150 5878 8409 14287 6 Washim 107 29 244 381 9 390 610 1000 1212 324 2756 4292 101 4393 6885 11278 7 Amravati 200 41 194 433 3 438 562 1000 4812 991 4683 10438 71 10557 13525 24083 8 Wardha 171 57 227 454 5 460 540 1000 1779 587 2358 4713 53 4777 5600 10376 9 Nagpur 162 112 112 383 16 402 598 1000 6047 4193 4159 14289 583 14981 22300 37281

10 Bhandara 172 21 266 458 42 502 498 1000 1762 219 2734 4703 434 5149 5114 10263 11 Gondiya 244 48 196 479 22 511 489 1000 2761 547 2215 5411 250 5772 5534 11306 12 Gadchiroli 157 27 357 540 1 542 458 1000 1495 259 3404 5151 12 5170 4369 9538 13 Chandrapur 149 57 261 466 6 473 527 1000 2933 1122 5151 9198 122 9328 10411 19739 14 Yavatmal 140 44 270 449 1 455 545 1000 3585 1116 6911 11494 33 11644 13967 25611 15 Nanded 201 32 134 367 3 370 630 1000 5519 890 3672 10082 91 10172 17317 27489 16 Hingoli 149 28 193 369 3 372 628 1000 1720 328 2226 4265 33 4306 7255 11561 17 Parbhani 248 20 143 411 14 425 575 1000 3806 312 2201 6312 213 6532 8823 15355 18 Jalna 194 41 202 436 2 439 561 1000 3503 741 3649 7893 43 7936 10159 18094

Page 115: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

111

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons(CWS) Estimated persons(00)(CWS)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-

72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

19 Aurangabad 174 75 136 380 10 394 606 1000 5490 2370 4290 12021 308 12459 19181 31640 20 Nashik 206 71 147 424 2 426 574 1000 8344 2874 5941 17156 96 17254 23245 40499 21 Thane 125 216 47 386 17 406 594 1000 12284 21149 4596 37846 1693 39723 58232 97955 22 Mumbai 145 251 15 407 17 427 573 1000 15980 27714 1601 44910 1845 47139 63232 110372 24 Raigad 163 121 79 360 23 385 615 1000 3632 2694 1760 8029 512 8597 13720 22317 25 Pune 180 151 73 404 20 424 576 1000 14449 12092 5883 32367 1587 34010 46176 80186 26 Ahmednagar 222 43 161 425 15 441 559 1000 8982 1737 6507 17217 621 17847 22661 40508 27 Bid 260 31 129 421 6 427 573 1000 6088 732 3028 9849 141 9990 13405 23396 28 Latur 180 34 130 344 1 346 654 1000 4307 816 3116 8230 27 8266 15651 23917 29 Osmanabad 236 31 154 421 2 423 577 1000 3158 421 2062 5629 20 5662 7716 13378 30 Solapur 228 77 156 449 3 464 536 1000 8280 2806 5664 16338 113 16862 19515 36378 31 Satara 251 73 110 433 11 446 554 1000 6622 1921 2893 11417 302 11738 14606 26344 32 Ratnagiri 254 36 106 397 6 403 597 1000 3892 555 1618 6065 99 6164 9133 15296 33 Sindhudurg 254 26 131 410 11 421 579 1000 1961 200 1009 3168 87 3257 4474 7730 34 Kolhapur 256 72 102 430 7 438 562 1000 8899 2511 3545 14932 231 15187 19520 34706 35 Sangli 279 59 89 426 3 431 569 1000 7676 1635 2458 11740 94 11863 15680 27543

Maharashtra 185 102 128 413 11 426 574 1000 178785 98317 123480 398625 10759 411342 553175 964517

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 116: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

112

Table 36: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current daily activity

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Rural Pooled sample Male

District

code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons days Estimated persons days(00) 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all 11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 335 18 161 514 39 554 446 1000 11688 640 5629 17931 1374 19332 15556 34888 2 Dhule 244 62 206 508 1 512 488 1000 11912 3001 10030 24780 37 24980 23767 48747 3 Jalgaon 231 68 227 520 22 548 452 1000 20816 6119 20472 46808 1951 49358 40695 90053 4 Buldhana 204 38 258 496 28 528 472 1000 14917 2803 18926 36362 2058 38704 34552 73256 5 Akola 173 36 330 538 43 582 418 1000 5608 1161 10719 17477 1409 18897 13567 32464 6 Washim 160 42 293 494 45 541 459 1000 5518 1451 10100 17010 1566 18635 15828 34463 7 Amravati 307 18 248 558 38 611 389 1000 17956 1081 14478 32642 2217 35732 22715 58447 8 Wardha 232 73 269 572 6 579 421 1000 6220 1947 7204 15349 170 15540 11284 26824 9 Nagpur 245 85 213 541 10 552 448 1000 12286 4253 10699 27139 497 27736 22467 50203

10 Bhandara 226 16 345 584 55 642 358 1000 7406 524 11315 19140 1794 21039 11716 32755 11 Gondiya 294 59 199 536 53 604 396 1000 10362 2062 6992 18859 1852 21268 13930 35197 12 Gadchiroli 216 30 369 609 9 624 376 1000 6660 928 11404 18808 270 19262 11629 30890 13 Chandrapur 243 40 348 629 24 655 345 1000 11801 1915 16871 30518 1169 31756 16725 48481 14 Yavatmal 203 48 307 538 26 583 417 1000 15642 3661 23617 41438 1994 44914 32118 77032 15 Nanded 338 32 146 516 1 518 482 1000 25474 2418 11043 38935 100 39035 36352 75387 16 Hingoli 231 30 244 505 5 510 490 1000 7586 993 8031 16610 165 16775 16098 32873 17 Parbhani 392 9 147 548 12 560 440 1000 14876 348 5573 20796 442 21238 16696 37934 18 Jalna 260 47 208 510 7 522 478 1000 13657 2462 10890 26715 345 27353 25075 52428 19 Aurangabad 267 49 239 540 19 573 427 1000 19958 3627 17870 40359 1407 42862 31918 74780 20 Nashik 344 56 178 577 2 580 420 1000 31193 5072 16099 52275 167 52531 38034 90566

Page 117: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

113

District

code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons days Estimated persons days(00) 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all 11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

21 Thane 209 149 175 525 32 565 435 1000 18728 13314 15638 47006 2890 50570 38888 89458 24 Raigad 214 139 137 485 52 542 458 1000 11690 7607 7459 26476 2855 29611 25000 54611 25 Pune 322 104 137 560 66 629 371 1000 34749 11258 14788 60459 7102 67897 40073 107970 26 Ahmednagar 263 44 137 442 31 475 525 1000 32838 5501 17072 55130 3857 59268 65377 124645 27 Bid 395 20 145 560 9 569 431 1000 28796 1443 10599 40838 660 41498 31392 72890 28 Latur 318 45 175 537 2 539 461 1000 21124 2958 11614 35696 113 35808 30652 66460 29 Osmanabad 352 43 195 589 2 592 408 1000 13833 1704 7674 23174 66 23277 16041 39317 30 Solapur 295 75 186 542 15 571 429 1000 26752 6838 16858 49158 1330 51778 38836 90615 31 Satara 313 105 128 541 28 574 426 1000 24322 8184 9973 42115 2150 44630 33174 77804 32 Ratnagiri 349 33 168 550 17 567 433 1000 14446 1376 6961 22783 707 23490 17929 41418 33 Sindhudurg 342 31 201 575 27 601 399 1000 8888 804 5227 14919 690 15609 10344 25952 34 Kolhapur 333 94 155 577 11 593 407 1000 29318 8314 13681 50909 1000 52313 35858 88171 35 Sangli 379 80 106 564 5 570 430 1000 28209 5989 7866 42045 404 42469 32056 74525 Maharashtra 284 61 198 538 22 565 435 1000 565229 121755 393372 1070657 44808 1125164 866342 1991506

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 118: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

114

Table 36: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current daily activity

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Rural Pooled sample Female

District

code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00) 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all 11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 281 5 122 407 49 457 543 1000 9454 153 4123 13694 1649 15380 18290 33670 2 Dhule 140 19 188 342 4 350 650 1000 5864 778 7880 14319 170 14692 27228 41921 3 Jalgaon 144 6 202 349 35 387 613 1000 12751 559 17847 30900 3120 34276 54278 88555 4 Buldhana 82 3 152 233 23 261 739 1000 5940 219 10972 16754 1650 18782 53250 72032 5 Akola 13 7 176 196 27 223 777 1000 386 221 5349 5957 822 6778 23557 30335 6 Washim 26 3 171 201 11 211 789 1000 861 105 5598 6564 355 6919 25806 32725 7 Amravati 130 6 159 276 34 328 672 1000 6971 306 8547 14828 1802 17625 36065 53690 8 Wardha 144 2 230 375 5 381 619 1000 4229 62 6737 10978 137 11164 18119 29283 9 Nagpur 137 5 185 319 18 344 656 1000 5276 176 7128 12331 693 13273 25338 38611

10 Bhandara 111 4 192 306 65 372 628 1000 3419 120 5902 9417 2008 11449 19314 30763 11 Gondiya 206 30 191 422 24 451 549 1000 6910 1003 6430 14187 810 15154 18449 33603 12 Gadchiroli 102 5 350 456 7 464 536 1000 3203 166 11047 14399 212 14628 16915 31542 13 Chandrapur 93 4 278 375 0 376 624 1000 4742 217 14181 19117 0 19140 31817 50957 14 Yavatmal 69 13 225 285 26 333 667 1000 4670 899 15292 19401 1778 22639 45437 68076 15 Nanded 99 1 155 255 3 259 741 1000 6802 100 10673 17575 238 17814 51007 68821 16 Hingoli 53 3 152 208 0 208 792 1000 1863 109 5321 7286 0 7293 27686 34979 17 Parbhani 208 1 137 340 8 354 646 1000 8025 43 5310 13155 322 13699 24961 38660 18 Jalna 145 0 166 311 12 323 677 1000 7208 0 8258 15461 583 16049 33680 49729 19 Aurangabad 146 2 97 244 12 257 743 1000 9147 124 6084 15284 764 16120 46554 62674 20 Nashik 158 20 166 341 1 344 656 1000 13640 1688 14336 29457 86 29751 56615 86366 21 Thane 111 22 69 194 21 223 777 1000 10398 2074 6453 18149 1977 20902 72815 93717 24 Raigad 117 14 46 177 21 198 802 1000 6470 749 2568 9769 1136 10923 44357 55280 25 Pune 250 7 75 331 47 379 621 1000 26245 703 7903 34745 4899 39751 65148 104899

Page 119: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

115

District

code

District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00) 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all 11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

26 Ahmednagar 194 7 155 353 24 381 619 1000 19950 765 15872 36225 2515 39102 63618 102720 27 Bid 136 12 110 258 12 270 730 1000 8665 754 7013 16432 778 17210 46574 63784 28 Latur 66 4 119 190 2 192 808 1000 4285 284 7768 12337 141 12478 52591 65069 29 Osmanabad 144 9 112 263 1 265 735 1000 5690 339 4434 10377 24 10488 29014 39502 30 Solapur 224 23 138 367 13 398 602 1000 19897 2011 12270 32585 1114 35292 53406 88698 31 Satara 200 21 85 306 9 315 685 1000 14699 1562 6242 22478 625 23129 50350 73478 32 Ratnagiri 150 3 55 208 6 215 785 1000 7220 163 2662 10046 308 10354 37891 48245 33 Sindhudurg 119 5 46 158 1 171 829 1000 2810 122 1079 3731 23 4034 19545 23579 34 Kolhapur 196 9 78 271 8 291 709 1000 17050 819 6832 23653 706 25408 61794 87202 35 Sangli 217 6 56 276 2 280 720 1000 16463 443 4247 20935 129 21283 54669 75952

Maharashtra 148 9 138 291 17 312 688 1000 281205 17835 262360 552526 31576 592976 1306139 1899116

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 120: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

116

Table 36: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current daily activity

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Rural Pooled sample Persons

District

code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00) 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 308 12 142 461 44 506 494 1000 21143 793 9753 31626 3023 34712 33847 68558 2 Dhule 196 42 198 431 2 438 562 1000 17775 3779 17910 39099 208 39672 50996 90668 3 Jalgaon 188 37 215 435 28 468 532 1000 33567 6678 38319 77708 5071 83635 94973 178608 4 Buldhana 144 21 206 366 26 396 604 1000 20857 3022 29898 53116 3709 57486 87802 145288 5 Akola 95 22 256 373 36 409 591 1000 5994 1382 16068 23434 2231 25675 37124 62799 6 Washim 95 23 234 351 29 380 620 1000 6379 1556 15698 23574 1921 25554 41635 67189 7 Amravati 222 12 205 423 36 476 524 1000 24927 1387 23025 47469 4018 53357 58780 112137 8 Wardha 186 36 248 469 5 476 524 1000 10449 2009 13940 26327 307 26705 29403 56108 9 Nagpur 198 50 201 444 13 462 538 1000 17561 4429 17827 39470 1191 41009 47805 88814

10 Bhandara 170 10 271 450 60 511 489 1000 10825 643 17218 28557 3802 32488 31030 63518 11 Gondiya 251 45 195 480 39 529 471 1000 17272 3065 13423 33046 2662 36421 32379 68800 12 Gadchiroli 158 18 360 532 8 543 457 1000 9863 1093 22450 33207 483 33890 28543 62433 13 Chandrapur 166 21 312 499 12 512 488 1000 16543 2132 31052 49635 1169 50896 48542 99437 14 Yavatmal 140 31 268 419 26 466 534 1000 20312 4560 38909 60839 3772 67553 77555 145108 15 Nanded 224 17 151 392 2 394 606 1000 32277 2518 21716 56510 338 56848 87360 144208 16 Hingoli 139 16 197 352 2 355 645 1000 9449 1102 13352 23896 165 24068 43784 67852 17 Parbhani 299 5 142 443 10 456 544 1000 22901 390 10883 33951 764 34937 41657 76594 18 Jalna 204 24 187 413 9 425 575 1000 20864 2462 19147 42176 928 43402 58755 102157 19 Aurangabad 212 27 174 405 16 429 571 1000 29106 3751 23954 55643 2171 58982 78472 137454 20 Nashik 253 38 172 462 1 465 535 1000 44833 6760 30435 81732 254 82282 94649 176932 21 Thane 159 84 121 356 27 390 610 1000 29126 15388 22091 65155 4867 71472 111703 183174

Page 121: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

117

District

code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00) 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

24 Raigad 165 76 91 330 36 369 631 1000 18160 8356 10027 36245 3991 40534 69357 109891 25 Pune 287 56 107 447 56 506 494 1000 60995 11961 22691 95204 12001 107648 105221 212870 26 Ahmednagar 232 28 145 402 28 433 567 1000 52789 6266 32944 91356 6372 98370 128995 227365 27 Bid 274 16 129 419 11 430 570 1000 37461 2197 17612 57270 1438 58708 77966 136674 28 Latur 193 25 147 365 2 367 633 1000 25409 3242 19382 48033 253 48286 83243 131529 29 Osmanabad 248 26 154 426 1 428 572 1000 19522 2044 12108 33551 90 33764 45055 78819 30 Solapur 260 49 162 456 14 486 514 1000 46649 8849 29129 81743 2443 87070 92243 179313 31 Satara 258 64 107 427 18 448 552 1000 39021 9746 16216 64593 2776 67758 83524 151282 32 Ratnagiri 242 17 107 366 11 377 623 1000 21666 1540 9623 32829 1015 33844 55819 89663 33 Sindhudurg 236 19 127 377 14 397 603 1000 11698 925 6306 18650 713 19643 29889 49531 34 Kolhapur 264 52 117 425 10 443 557 1000 46369 9134 20513 74561 1706 77721 97652 175373 35 Sangli 297 43 80 419 4 424 576 1000 44673 6432 12113 62980 534 63751 86725 150477

Maharashtra 218 36 169 417 20 442 558 1000 846434 139590 655732 1623183 76384 1718141 2172481 3890622

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 122: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

118

Table 36: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current daily activity

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Urban Pooled Sample Male

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all 11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 169 229 49 446 14 462 538 1000 1027 1391 299 2705 84 2801 3261 6062 2 Dhule 191 198 73 461 31 493 507 1000 2553 2636 971 6149 419 6580 6756 13336 3 Jalgaon 243 155 135 529 29 561 439 1000 7151 4565 3963 15598 857 16537 12928 29464 4 Buldhana 254 123 170 541 18 565 435 1000 3465 1676 2312 7380 251 7705 5932 13637 5 Akola 220 189 88 489 39 535 465 1000 4354 3730 1729 9669 764 10578 9178 19756 6 Washim 280 105 115 499 16 515 485 1000 1699 638 698 3031 96 3131 2948 6080 7 Amravati 268 152 101 511 15 536 464 1000 7927 4505 3003 15144 430 15865 13742 29607 8 Wardha 184 207 117 505 37 545 455 1000 1523 1714 972 4185 305 4514 3773 8287 9 Nagpur 228 232 83 537 22 565 435 1000 20107 20476 7278 47286 1931 49791 38331 88122

10 Bhandara 230 187 98 515 20 535 465 1000 962 782 413 2157 84 2240 1950 4191 11 Gondiya 219 209 85 503 35 548 452 1000 1175 1123 457 2703 188 2943 2427 5370 12 Gadchiroli 195 303 105 600 15 617 383 1000 405 630 218 1249 31 1284 798 2081 13 Chandrapur 181 247 162 589 7 598 402 1000 3307 4522 2964 10779 136 10930 7357 18287 14 Yavatmal 224 148 121 483 16 509 491 1000 3978 2632 2140 8575 287 9038 8703 17741 15 Nanded 203 138 118 459 13 472 528 1000 5030 3417 2922 11368 323 11692 13053 24745 16 Hingoli 252 155 137 543 11 554 446 1000 1747 1074 953 3771 76 3850 3096 6945 17 Parbhani 209 104 152 461 68 533 467 1000 3262 1614 2377 7196 1066 8319 7275 15594 18 Jalna 141 185 222 549 24 572 428 1000 1848 2427 2903 7178 309 7487 5597 13084 19 Aurangabad 160 255 61 476 30 506 494 1000 6706 10681 2549 19900 1247 21183 20649 41832 20 Nashik 163 190 141 492 10 504 496 1000 9304 10822 8054 28068 579 28759 28246 57005 21 Thane 166 400 24 589 20 609 391 1000 45570 110005 6624 161955 5419 167618 107533 275151 22 Mumbai 228 360 21 601 20 628 372 1000 97677 154136 8833 257731 8561 269207 159456 428663

Page 123: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

119

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all 11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

24 Raigad 185 370 37 591 20 611 389 1000 4545 9093 911 14550 491 15041 9566 24607 25 Pune 167 324 45 535 26 562 438 1000 31159 60412 8456 99775 4794 104821 81724 186545 26 Ahmednagar 229 138 111 477 52 530 470 1000 6882 4157 3337 14329 1549 15924 14143 30068 27 Bid 193 170 90 452 60 514 486 1000 2574 2268 1204 6028 804 6850 6479 13330 28 Latur 234 116 96 442 7 453 547 1000 4425 2191 1815 8368 137 8567 10353 18920 29 Osmanabad 266 109 177 548 14 565 435 1000 2020 828 1346 4168 107 4300 3307 7607 30 Solapur 219 194 98 493 23 534 466 1000 8268 7314 3697 18630 876 20155 17617 37772 31 Satara 305 165 65 533 17 552 448 1000 5344 2892 1139 9351 303 9678 7856 17534 32 Ratnagiri 290 195 29 513 74 588 412 1000 2567 1728 253 4548 660 5208 3654 8862 33 Sindhudurg 250 166 94 510 24 534 466 1000 530 352 199 1081 51 1131 989 2120 34 Kolhapur 311 198 84 591 5 598 402 1000 10979 6969 2959 20833 171 21079 14196 35275 35 Sangli 248 199 87 533 23 558 442 1000 5549 4449 1955 11926 517 12470 9895 22366

Maharashtra 206 293 59 554 22 580 420 1000 315620 447848 89902 847362 33904 887274 642769 1530043

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 124: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

120

Table 36: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current daily activity STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Urban Pooled Sample Female

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all

11-21,61,6

2

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 35 85 22 142 0 142 858 1000 162 401 104 666 0 666 4035 4702 2 Dhule 24 41 23 88 7 96 904 1000 267 455 258 973 81 1060 9940 11001 3 Jalgaon 59 7 47 114 2 116 884 1000 1583 190 1265 3038 58 3096 23597 26693 4 Buldhana 55 14 58 127 0 127 873 1000 792 199 841 1832 0 1832 12574 14406 5 Akola 37 39 23 99 4 104 896 1000 639 686 406 1731 72 1803 15613 17416 6 Washim 41 10 39 90 10 100 900 1000 232 59 222 513 54 567 5114 5681 7 Amravati 25 39 18 82 0 82 918 1000 678 1031 485 2193 0 2193 24534 26727 8 Wardha 42 43 58 140 20 163 837 1000 347 350 480 1147 163 1340 6867 8207 9 Nagpur 49 52 32 132 19 151 849 1000 4124 4341 2650 11060 1570 12685 71228 83913

10 Bhandara 96 26 126 245 35 282 718 1000 395 107 519 1013 144 1164 2964 4129 11 Gondiya 33 21 62 116 20 136 864 1000 157 103 300 559 95 654 4156 4811 12 Gadchiroli 89 39 52 180 0 180 820 1000 199 87 117 403 0 403 1839 2242 13 Chandrapur 31 59 32 121 4 126 874 1000 641 1201 644 2480 85 2571 17861 20432 14 Yavatmal 38 38 44 118 5 124 876 1000 615 620 725 1938 78 2037 14347 16383 15 Nanded 29 12 29 70 3 72 928 1000 671 282 686 1639 60 1699 21765 23464 16 Hingoli 78 21 18 109 25 142 858 1000 466 128 108 651 147 849 5129 5978 17 Parbhani 41 13 28 82 0 82 918 1000 637 210 437 1284 5 1289 14340 15629 18 Jalna 5 26 56 87 5 92 908 1000 60 298 639 996 58 1054 10364 11418 19 Aurangabad 30 51 24 104 16 120 880 1000 1246 2138 1000 4384 659 5043 37135 42178 20 Nashik 42 48 48 137 1 138 862 1000 2063 2365 2361 6784 60 6849 42663 49512 21 Thane 37 97 6 141 12 154 846 1000 8468 22153 1466 32086 2830 34916 192417 227333 22 Mumbai 34 116 3 152 14 167 833 1000 11661 39878 937 52396 4980 57455 286479 343934

Page 125: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

121

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00)

11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 all

11-21,61,6

2

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

24 Raigad 34 63 7 104 7 111 889 1000 724 1367 146 2238 155 2393 19214 21607 25 Pune 46 75 11 132 6 138 862 1000 7467 12189 1713 21308 940 22310 139427 161737 26 Ahmednagar 83 62 38 182 11 194 806 1000 2166 1616 982 4758 281 5046 21027 26073 27 Bid 15 45 4 64 19 83 917 1000 199 616 61 876 256 1132 12584 13716 28 Latur 11 17 17 45 0 45 955 1000 184 280 293 758 0 758 16182 16940 29 Osmanabad 80 10 42 121 4 135 865 1000 578 71 299 870 26 975 6224 7199 30 Solapur 85 91 45 215 4 225 775 1000 3172 3427 1702 8071 136 8437 29058 37494 31 Satara 62 48 33 144 0 144 856 1000 966 747 511 2224 6 2231 13264 15494 32 Ratnagiri 98 75 4 178 10 188 812 1000 811 621 35 1467 84 1551 6709 8260 33 Sindhudurg 17 63 14 94 1 95 905 1000 33 123 27 183 2 185 1764 1950 34 Kolhapur 66 43 20 129 5 135 865 1000 2143 1402 633 4176 169 4346 27952 32297 35 Sangli 46 29 42 116 2 118 882 1000 904 574 832 2310 37 2347 17519 19867

Maharashtra 42 75 18 135 10 145 855 1000 55448 100315 23881 179003 13293 192936 1135887 1328823

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 126: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

122

Table 36: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current daily activity STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector =Urban Pooled Sample Persons

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00) 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,6231,71,7

2 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 111 166 37 313 8 322 678 1000 1190 1791 403 3372 84 3467 7296 10763 2 Dhule 116 127 50 293 21 314 686 1000 2821 3091 1229 7121 500 7640 16696 24336 3 Jalgaon 156 85 93 332 16 350 650 1000 8734 4755 5228 18636 916 19633 36525 56158 4 Buldhana 152 67 112 329 9 340 660 1000 4256 1876 3152 9212 251 9536 18507 28043 5 Akola 134 119 57 307 22 333 667 1000 4993 4416 2135 11399 836 12381 24792 37172 6 Washim 164 59 78 301 13 314 686 1000 1932 696 920 3544 150 3698 8062 11760 7 Amravati 153 98 62 308 8 321 679 1000 8605 5536 3488 17337 430 18059 38275 56334 8 Wardha 113 125 88 323 28 355 645 1000 1870 2064 1452 5332 469 5855 10640 16494 9 Nagpur 141 144 58 339 20 363 637 1000 24231 24817 9928 58346 3500 62476 109559 172035

10 Bhandara 163 107 112 381 27 409 591 1000 1357 889 931 3169 227 3405 4915 8320 11 Gondiya 131 120 74 320 28 353 647 1000 1331 1225 757 3263 283 3598 6583 10180 12 Gadchiroli 140 166 78 382 7 390 610 1000 604 717 335 1652 31 1687 2636 4323 13 Chandrapur 102 148 93 342 6 349 651 1000 3948 5723 3609 13259 221 13501 25218 38719 14 Yavatmal 135 95 84 308 11 325 675 1000 4593 3252 2865 10514 365 11074 23050 34124 15 Nanded 118 77 75 270 8 278 722 1000 5701 3699 3608 13007 383 13391 34818 48209 16 Hingoli 171 93 82 342 17 364 636 1000 2213 1202 1061 4422 223 4699 8225 12924 17 Parbhani 125 58 90 272 34 308 692 1000 3899 1825 2813 8479 1071 9608 21616 31223 18 Jalna 78 111 145 334 15 349 651 1000 1908 2725 3541 8174 367 8541 15961 24502 19 Aurangabad 95 153 42 289 23 312 688 1000 7951 12819 3549 24284 1906 26226 57785 84011 20 Nashik 107 124 98 327 6 334 666 1000 11367 13187 10415 34852 639 35608 70909 106517 21 Thane 108 263 16 386 16 403 597 1000 54037 132158 8090 194041 8249 202534 299950 502484 22 Mumbai 142 251 13 401 18 423 577 1000 109338 194014 9769 310128 13541 326662 445935 772597 24 Raigad 114 226 23 363 14 377 623 1000 5269 10461 1058 16788 646 17434 28780 46214

Page 127: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

123

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00) 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all 11-

21,61,6231,71,7

2 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-99 11-99

25 Pune 111 208 29 348 16 365 635 1000 38626 72602 10169 121082 5734 127131 221151 348282 26 Ahmednagar 161 103 77 340 33 374 626 1000 9048 5774 4319 19087 1830 20970 35170 56140 27 Bid 103 107 47 255 39 295 705 1000 2773 2884 1265 6904 1060 7982 19064 27046 28 Latur 129 69 59 254 4 260 740 1000 4609 2471 2108 9125 137 9325 26535 35860 29 Osmanabad 175 61 111 340 9 356 644 1000 2598 899 1645 5038 133 5275 9531 14806 30 Solapur 152 143 72 355 13 380 620 1000 11440 10741 5399 26700 1012 28592 46675 75266 31 Satara 191 110 50 350 9 361 639 1000 6310 3638 1650 11575 309 11908 21120 33028 32 Ratnagiri 197 137 17 351 43 395 605 1000 3378 2349 288 6015 744 6759 10363 17122 33 Sindhudurg 138 117 56 310 13 323 677 1000 563 475 226 1264 53 1316 2753 4070 34 Kolhapur 194 124 53 370 5 376 624 1000 13122 8371 3591 25008 340 25424 42148 67572 35 Sangli 153 119 66 337 13 351 649 1000 6453 5023 2787 14237 554 14818 27415 42232

Maharashtra 130 192 40 359 17 378 622 1000 371068 548163 113783 1026365 47196 1080211 1778656 2858867

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 128: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

124

Table 36: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current daily activity

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Combined Pooled Sample Male

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00) 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all

11-21,61,6

2 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 311 50 145 504 36 540 460 1000 12716 2031 5928 20636 1458 22133 18817 40950 2 Dhule 233 91 177 498 7 508 492 1000 14465 5637 11001 30929 456 31559 30523 62083 3 Jalgaon 234 89 204 522 23 551 449 1000 27967 10685 24435 62406 2808 65895 53623 119518 4 Buldhana 212 52 244 503 27 534 466 1000 18381 4479 21238 43742 2310 46409 40484 86893 5 Akola 191 94 238 520 42 564 436 1000 9962 4891 12449 27146 2173 29475 22745 52220 6 Washim 178 52 266 494 41 537 463 1000 7218 2089 10797 20041 1663 21766 18777 40543 7 Amravati 294 63 199 543 30 586 414 1000 25883 5586 17481 47785 2647 51597 36457 88054 8 Wardha 221 104 233 556 14 571 429 1000 7743 3661 8175 19534 475 20055 15057 35111 9 Nagpur 234 179 130 538 18 560 440 1000 32393 24729 17977 74425 2428 77527 60798 138326

10 Bhandara 227 35 317 576 51 630 370 1000 8369 1305 11728 21297 1877 23279 13666 36946 11 Gondiya 284 78 184 532 50 597 403 1000 11537 3184 7450 21562 2040 24211 16356 40567 12 Gadchiroli 214 47 352 608 9 623 377 1000 7065 1558 11622 20057 301 20546 12426 32972 13 Chandrapur 226 96 297 619 20 639 361 1000 15108 6437 19835 41297 1306 42686 24082 66768 14 Yavatmal 207 66 272 528 24 569 431 1000 19620 6293 25757 50013 2282 53952 40821 94773 15 Nanded 305 58 139 502 4 507 493 1000 30504 5835 13965 50303 423 50726 49405 100131 16 Hingoli 234 52 226 512 6 518 482 1000 9333 2067 8984 20381 241 20625 19194 39819 17 Parbhani 339 37 149 523 28 552 448 1000 18138 1962 7949 27992 1508 29557 23971 53528 18 Jalna 237 75 211 517 10 532 468 1000 15505 4889 13792 33893 654 34840 30672 65512 19 Aurangabad 229 123 175 517 23 549 451 1000 26664 14308 20419 60260 2654 64045 52567 116612 20 Nashik 274 108 164 544 5 551 449 1000 40497 15894 24153 80343 747 81290 66280 147571 21 Thane 176 338 61 573 23 598 402 1000 64297 123319 22262 208961 8309 218187 146421 364608 22 Mumbai 228 360 21 601 20 628 372 1000 97677 154136 8833 257731 8561 269207 159456 428663 24 Raigad 205 211 106 518 42 564 436 1000 16234 16700 8371 41025 3346 44652 34566 79218

Page 129: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

125

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00) 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82

91-99 all

11-21,61,6

2 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

25 Pune 224 243 79 544 40 586 414 1000 65908 71670 23243 160234 11896 172718 121797 294516 26 Ahmednagar 257 62 132 449 35 486 514 1000 39720 9658 20409 69459 5406 75193 79520 154713 27 Bid 364 43 137 544 17 561 439 1000 31371 3710 11803 46866 1464 48348 37871 86219 28 Latur 299 60 157 516 3 520 480 1000 25549 5149 13429 44063 249 44376 41005 85380 29 Osmanabad 338 54 192 583 4 588 412 1000 15852 2532 9020 27341 173 27577 19348 46924 30 Solapur 273 110 160 528 17 560 440 1000 35020 14152 20556 67788 2205 71933 56453 128386 31 Satara 311 116 117 540 26 570 430 1000 29666 11076 11112 51466 2454 54307 41031 95338 32 Ratnagiri 338 62 143 544 27 571 429 1000 17013 3104 7213 27331 1366 28697 21583 50280 33 Sindhudurg 335 41 193 570 26 596 404 1000 9418 1156 5426 15999 741 16740 11333 28073 34 Kolhapur 326 124 135 581 9 595 405 1000 40298 15284 16639 71741 1171 73392 50054 123446 35 Sangli 348 108 101 557 10 567 433 1000 33758 10437 9822 53971 921 54939 41951 96890

Maharashtra 250 162 137 545 22 571 429 1000 880849 569604 483274 1918019 78712 2012438 1509111 3521549

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 130: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

126

Table 36: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current daily activity

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Combined Pooled Sample Female

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00) 11-

21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-

99 all 11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 251 14 110 374 43 418 582 1000 9617 553 4227 14361 1649 16046 22326 38372 2 Dhule 116 23 154 289 5 298 702 1000 6131 1233 8137 15292 251 15753 37168 52921 3 Jalgaon 124 7 166 294 28 324 676 1000 14334 749 19112 33938 3178 37372 77875 115248 4 Buldhana 78 5 137 215 19 238 762 1000 6732 419 11812 18585 1650 20613 65824 86438 5 Akola 21 19 121 161 19 180 820 1000 1025 907 5755 7687 894 8581 39171 47752 6 Washim 28 4 152 184 11 195 805 1000 1093 164 5820 7077 409 7486 30920 38406 7 Amravati 95 17 112 212 22 246 754 1000 7648 1337 9032 17021 1802 19819 60598 80417 8 Wardha 122 11 192 323 8 334 666 1000 4575 412 7217 12124 300 12505 24986 37490 9 Nagpur 77 37 80 191 18 212 788 1000 9400 4517 9777 23391 2263 25958 96566 122524

10 Bhandara 109 7 184 299 62 361 639 1000 3814 227 6421 10429 2152 12614 22279 34892 11 Gondiya 184 29 175 384 24 412 588 1000 7066 1106 6730 14747 905 15808 22605 38413 12 Gadchiroli 101 7 330 438 6 445 555 1000 3402 253 11164 14802 212 15031 18753 33784 13 Chandrapur 75 20 208 303 1 304 696 1000 5383 1418 14825 21596 85 21710 49678 71388 14 Yavatmal 63 18 190 253 22 292 708 1000 5285 1519 16017 21339 1855 24675 59784 84459 15 Nanded 81 4 123 208 3 211 789 1000 7473 382 11359 19214 299 19513 72772 92285 16 Hingoli 57 6 133 194 4 199 801 1000 2329 237 5429 7937 147 8142 32815 40957 17 Parbhani 160 5 106 266 6 276 724 1000 8662 253 5747 14438 327 14988 39301 54289 18 Jalna 119 5 145 269 10 280 720 1000 7267 298 8896 16457 641 17102 44045 61147 19 Aurangabad 99 22 68 188 14 202 798 1000 10393 2262 7084 19668 1424 21163 83690 104852 20 Nashik 116 30 123 267 1 269 731 1000 15703 4053 16697 36242 146 36600 99278 135878 21 Thane 59 75 25 156 15 174 826 1000 18866 24226 7918 50235 4807 55818 265232 321050 22 Mumbai 34 116 3 152 14 167 833 1000 11661 39878 937 52396 4980 57455 286479 343934 24 Raigad 94 28 35 156 17 173 827 1000 7195 2116 2714 12007 1291 13316 63571 76887

Page 131: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

127

District code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00) 11-

21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-

99 all 11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

25 Pune 126 48 36 210 22 233 767 1000 33713 12893 9616 56052 5839 62061 204575 266636 26 Ahmednagar 172 18 131 318 22 343 657 1000 22116 2381 16854 40983 2796 44148 84645 128793 27 Bid 114 18 91 223 13 237 763 1000 8864 1370 7074 17308 1034 18342 59158 77500 28 Latur 55 7 98 160 2 161 839 1000 4470 565 8061 13095 141 13236 68773 82009 29 Osmanabad 134 9 101 241 1 245 755 1000 6268 411 4733 11248 50 11462 35238 46701 30 Solapur 183 43 111 322 10 347 653 1000 23068 5438 13972 40655 1250 43728 82464 126193 31 Satara 176 26 76 278 7 285 715 1000 15666 2309 6753 24702 632 25359 63613 88972 32 Ratnagiri 142 14 48 204 7 211 789 1000 8032 784 2697 11513 392 11905 44600 56505 33 Sindhudurg 111 10 43 153 1 165 835 1000 2843 244 1107 3914 25 4219 21309 25529 34 Kolhapur 161 19 62 233 7 249 751 1000 19193 2221 7465 27828 875 29754 89745 119499 35 Sangli 181 11 53 243 2 247 753 1000 17368 1017 5079 23245 166 23630 72188 95819

Maharashtra 104 37 89 227 14 243 757 1000 336653 118150 286241 731529 44869 785913 2442026 3227939

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 132: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

128

Table 36: Per 1000 distribution of persons-days by current daily activity

STATE: MAHARASHTRA Sector = Combined Pooled Sample Persons

District

code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00) 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-

99 all 11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

1 Nandurbar 282 33 128 441 39 481 519 1000 22332 2584 10155 34997 3107 38179 41143 79322 2 Dhule 179 60 166 402 6 411 589 1000 20596 6870 19138 46221 707 47312 67692 115004 3 Jalgaon 180 49 185 410 25 440 560 1000 42301 11434 43547 96344 5986 103268 131498 234766 4 Buldhana 145 28 191 360 23 387 613 1000 25113 4898 33050 62328 3960 67022 106308 173330 5 Akola 110 58 182 348 31 381 619 1000 10987 5798 18204 34833 3067 38056 61916 99972 6 Washim 105 29 210 343 26 371 629 1000 8311 2252 16618 27118 2072 29252 49697 78949 7 Amravati 199 41 157 385 26 424 576 1000 33531 6923 26513 64807 4449 71416 97055 168471 8 Wardha 170 56 212 436 11 448 552 1000 12319 4073 15392 31659 775 32560 40042 72602 9 Nagpur 160 112 106 375 18 397 603 1000 41793 29246 27755 97816 4691 103485 157364 260849

10 Bhandara 170 21 253 442 56 500 500 1000 12182 1532 18149 31726 4029 35893 35945 71838 11 Gondiya 236 54 180 460 37 507 493 1000 18604 4290 14180 36309 2945 40019 38962 78981 12 Gadchiroli 157 27 341 522 8 533 467 1000 10467 1810 22786 34859 514 35577 31180 66756 13 Chandrapur 148 57 251 455 10 466 534 1000 20491 7855 34660 62894 1390 64396 73760 138156 14 Yavatmal 139 44 233 398 23 439 561 1000 24905 7812 41774 71353 4137 78627 100605 179232 15 Nanded 197 32 132 361 4 365 635 1000 37977 6217 25324 69517 721 70239 122177 192417 16 Hingoli 144 29 178 351 5 356 644 1000 11662 2303 14413 28318 388 28766 52009 80776 17 Parbhani 249 21 127 394 17 413 587 1000 26799 2215 13696 42430 1835 44545 63272 107817 18 Jalna 180 41 179 398 10 410 590 1000 22772 5187 22689 50350 1295 51943 74717 126659 19 Aurangabad 167 75 124 361 18 385 615 1000 37057 16570 27503 79927 4078 85208 136257 221464 20 Nashik 198 70 144 411 3 416 584 1000 56200 19947 40850 116585 893 117890 165559 283449 21 Thane 121 215 44 378 19 400 600 1000 83163 147546 30181 259196 13116 274006 411653 685659 22 Mumbai 142 251 13 401 18 423 577 1000 109338 194014 9769 310128 13541 326662 445935 772597 24 Raigad 150 121 71 340 30 371 629 1000 23429 18817 11085 53033 4637 57968 98137 156105

Page 133: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

129

District

code District Name

per thousand distribution of persons_days Estimated persons_days(00) 11-

21,61,62

31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 & 82 11-82 91-

99 all 11-21,61,62 31,71,72 41-51 11-72 81 &

82 11-82 91-99 11-99

25 Pune 178 151 59 385 32 418 582 1000 99621 84563 32860 216286 17736 234779 326372 561151 26 Ahmednagar 218 42 131 390 29 421 579 1000 61836 12039 37263 110443 8202 119340 164166 283506 27 Bid 246 31 115 392 15 407 593 1000 40235 5080 18877 64174 2498 66690 97029 163720 28 Latur 179 34 128 341 2 344 656 1000 30018 5714 21490 57159 390 57612 109777 167389 29 Osmanabad 236 31 147 412 2 417 583 1000 22120 2943 13753 38589 223 39039 54586 93625 30 Solapur 228 77 136 426 14 454 546 1000 58088 19590 34527 108443 3455 115662 138917 254579 31 Satara 246 73 97 413 17 432 568 1000 45331 13384 17866 76168 3085 79666 104644 184310 32 Ratnagiri 235 36 93 364 16 380 620 1000 25045 3888 9911 38844 1758 40602 66182 106785 33 Sindhudurg 229 26 122 372 14 391 609 1000 12261 1400 6532 19913 766 20959 32642 53601 34 Kolhapur 245 72 99 410 8 425 575 1000 59491 17505 24104 99570 2046 103145 139799 242945 35 Sangli 265 59 77 401 6 408 592 1000 51126 11455 14901 77216 1088 78569 114140 192709

Maharashtra 180 102 114 393 18 415 585 1000 1217502 687753 769515 2649548 123581 2798351 3951137 6749488

(Activity status codes as per Annexure 3)

Page 134: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

130

Annexure – 1

Sample size: Number of first stage units (villages/urban frame survey blocks)

District Rural Urban State Central Pooled State Central Pooled

Thane 20 20 40 108 72 180 Mumbai 0 0 0 114 98 212 Raigad 16 16 32 12 8 20 Ratnagiri 16 16 32 8 4 12 Sindhudurg 8 8 16 8 4 12 Pune 24 24 48 80 52 132 Solapur 24 24 48 24 16 40 Satara 20 20 40 12 8 20 Kolhapur 24 24 48 20 12 32 Sangli 20 20 40 12 8 20 Ahmadnagar 24 24 48 20 12 32 Nandurbar 12 12 24 8 4 12 Dhule 12 12 24 12 8 20 Jalgaon 22 24 46 20 12 32 Nashik 23 24 47 40 24 64 Nanded 20 20 40 12 8 20 Hingoli 8 8 16 8 4 12 Parbhani 8 8 16 12 8 20 Jalna 12 12 24 12 8 20 Aurangabad 16 16 32 20 12 32 Bid 16 16 32 12 8 20 Latur 16 16 32 12 8 20 Osmanabad 12 12 24 8 4 12 Buldhana 16 16 32 12 8 20 Akola 8 8 16 12 8 20 Washim 8 8 16 8 4 12 Amravati 16 16 32 20 12 32 Yavatmal 20 20 40 12 8 20 Wardha 8 8 16 12 8 20 Nagpur 12 12 24 47 32 79 Bhandara 8 8 16 8 4 12 Gondiya 12 12 24 8 4 12 Gadchiroli 8 8 16 8 4 12 Chandrapur 12 12 24 12 8 20 State 501 504 1005 753 502 1255

Page 135: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

131

Annexure – 2

Abbreviations used in this Report MPCE : Monthly Per Capita Consumption Expenditure URP : Uniform Reference Period MRP : Mixed Reference Period MMRP : Modified Mixed Reference Period RSE : Relative Standard Error IV : Inverse of Variance MR : Matching Ratio WPR : Worker Population Ratio LFPR : Labour Force Participation Rate PS+SS : Principal Status+ Subsidiary Status CWS : Current Weekly Status CDS : Current Daily Status

Page 136: GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA REPORT ON POOLING OF …€¦ · (JULY, 2009 – JUNE, 2010) HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER EXPENDITURE (TYPE 1 & 2) & EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT Directorate of Economics

132

Annexure – 3 Description of Activity status code Working (or Employed) i) Self-employed 11 - Worked in household enterprises (self-employed) as own-account worker 12 - Worked in household enterprises (self-employed) as an employer 21 - Worked in household enterprises (self-employed) as helper ii) Regular wage / Salaried employee 31- Worked as regular wage/salaried employee iii) Casual labour 41 - Worked as casual wage labour in public works other than Mahatma Gandhi NREG public works 42 - Worked as casual wage labour in Mahatma Gandhi NREG public works 51 - Worked as casual wage labour in other types of works 61 - Did not work owing to sickness though there was work in household enterprise 62 - Did not work owing to other reasons though there was work in household enterprise 71 - Did not work owing to sickness but had regular salaried/wage employment 72 - Did not work owing to other reasons but had regular salaried/wage employment Not working but seeking/available for work (or Unemployed) 81 - Sought work or did not seek but was available for work (for usual status approach) 81 - Sought work (for current weekly status approach) 82 - Did not seek but was available for work (for current weekly status approach) Neither working nor available for work (or Not in Labour Force) 91 - Attended educational institutions 92 - Attended to domestic duties only 93 - Attended to domestic duties and was also engaged in free collection of goods (vegetables, roots, firewood, cattle feed, etc.), sewing, tailoring, weaving, etc. for household use 94 - Rentiers, pensioners, remittance recipients, etc. 95 - Not able to work owing to disability 97 - Others (including beggars, prostitutes, etc.) 98 - Did not work owing to sickness (for casual workers only) 99 - Children of age 0-4 years