Government Construction Strategy - EBDOG · Government Construction Strategy: Objective Overarching...
Transcript of Government Construction Strategy - EBDOG · Government Construction Strategy: Objective Overarching...
Government Construction Strategy
UNCLASSIFIED
Government Construction Change Programme
UNCLASSIFIED
Client focused
initiatives
Industry focused
initiatives
Government
Construction Strategy
Industrial Strategy for
Construction
Joint vision to 2025
setting out aspirations
Infrastructure Cost
Review
Green Construction
Board
Government Construction Strategy: Objective
Overarching target:
• Achieve a sustainable 15-20% reduction in the
cost of construction by the end of this parliament
(“Sustainable”: without adversely impacting either whole life value or
the long term financial health of the construction industry)
Already delivering:
• FY 2011/12: £72m; FY 2012/13: £447m
• First Half of FY 2013/14: £293m
• Some already achieving 15-20% vs FY 2009/10
UNCLASSIFIED
Government Construction Strategy: Overview
• Publication Construction Pipeline & Cost Benchmarks
• Trial New Procurement Models
• Building Information Modelling (BIM) / Gov Soft Landings
• Fair Payment: Project Bank Accounts / SMEs
• Effectiveness of Frameworks
• Pre-Qualification: PAS 91
• Performance Management / Six Monthly Government
Supplier Conference
• Government Construction Summit (2 July)
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Public Construction Initiatives Landscape
Evidence
Government Construction• Annual savings• Trial project case studies
Guidance
Government Construction• Effectiveness of frameworks report• Achieving Excellence in Construction (OGC)• Benchmarking methodology
IUK • Procurement routemap
(relaunch Jan 2014)
IUK • Routemap case studies
Peer support
HMEP• Tools and standards• Business improvement
toolkit
BIM • Mobile phone app• Guidance and tools• Videos / newsletters
MPLA • Leadership Academy
procurement module
MPLA • Project leaders network
CCS• CS Learning• Standard documents
IUK• Client working group
Event/ training / update
Online Hard copy document
Advocacy
Key
BIM • Case studies• Lessons learned
BIM • Mentors• Regional hubs• Early adopters (e.g., GSL)• Departmental engagement
Events
BIM• Events (tbc)
• Eco Build (Spring)
• GSL Conf (Jan 2014)
HMEP• Case studies
Government Construction• GCS Wrap up event (Feb 2014)
• Trial projects Winter event (March 2014)
• Construction Summit (July 2014)
SOPO• Procurement network
CCS –Crown Commercial Services
HMEP – Highways Maintenance Efficiency ProgrammeBIM – Business Information Modelling
RCUK• Industry / Supplier Events
(Spring / Summer 2014)
LGA• Regional hubs (will be
established in Spring 2014)
IUK • Routemap Re-launch
Roadshows (Q1 2014 /15)
LGA• National Conf (Jan 2014)
Government Construction• Trial project mentors
Professional bodies and Academia• To be explored in latter
part of 2014
Technology Strategy Board • Collaboration toolkit
Industrial Strategy• Details of activities of the
Procurement workstream tbc
To achieve 15-20% savings….
…leading public & private practitioners do the following:
• Leverage data – identify opportunities / inform decisions
• Standardise requirement
• Aggregate demand
• Engage with lower tiers
• Commit spend – promote supply chain investment in efficient delivery
• Create integrated client and supplier teams – minimise process
waste
remove waste / maximise
buying power }
UNCLASSIFIED
Outcomes vary depending on the “menu” adopted
1. Public Regional
Framework
2. Public Housing
Framework
3. Private Retail
Framework
Leverage data
Standardise requirement (constr.
process + product) X
Multiple clients /
products
Single client /
product
Single client /
product
Aggregate demand X
Multiple clients /
products
Single client /
product
Single client /
product
Engage with lower tiers
Commit spend Multiple projects
£200m p.a.
Single programme
£75m p.a.
Raised £400m to
£800m p.a.
Create integrated client and
supplier teams X
Savings achieved on construction
(excl. £50k+ saving from avoiding
single procurements)
1-2% 10% 20%+
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Cost led
procurement
Integrated Project Insurance Cost Led Procurement
Client goes to market with:
functional requirement
affordable quality benchmark
challenging cost ceiling (“should cost” capability)
IPI: integrated team backed by assurance and insurance product
Two Stage Open Book IPI without the insurance product
Lean Procurement Reducing procurement timescales
Driving changed behaviours and practices / exchanging experiences through client delivery group
Monitoring these changes, publishing outcomes and mentoring clients through industry support group
£
£ £
Trialling of New Models of Procurement
New Models: Common Characteristics
• “Intelligent client”: knows what they want, what it
should cost, how best to go to market
• Transparent pipelines of work
• Client standardises requirement and specifies output
for £x/m2 (set against downward cost curve)
• Early contractor involvement
• Client works with fully integrated supply chain to
create design and construction solution
• Open book
• Independent validation
UNCLASSIFIED
Trial Projects Programme: Case Study Reports
UNCLASSIFIED
Trial Project Case Studies and the “Menu”
UNCLASSIFIED
How the reported 17% savings were achieved
Strategic context Client Collaborative Supply chain
Aggregation of demand Yes MoJ Alliance
Agreement
Significant committed spend Yes Alliance Work
Progamme
Standardised procurement /
streamlined approval processes
Yes MoJ systems and
PPC2000
Lean programming Yes MoJ system and team
proposals
Client cost data base Yes Published benchmarks
Performance management Yes Framework
performance initiatives
Common new delivery model
characteristics deployed
Client Collaborative Supply chain
Challenging cost target / open book Yes 10% with open book
measurement
Affordable standardised output /
outcome requirement
Early contractor involvement Yes Tier 1 contractor and
Tier 2 subcontractors
Lower tier engagement: fully
integrated supply chain
Yes Tier 2 early
appointments
Lower tier engagement: innovation
encouraged / achieved
Yes EMCOR and SCC
innovations
Standard form of contract with
minimum amendments
Yes PPC2000 SPC2000
Effectively led change in team
behaviours and practices
Yes Commitment of key
individuals
Two Stage Open Book characteristics deployed
Client Collaborative Supply chain
First stage selection of integrated
team on open book basis and ability to
deliver savings / project objectives
Yes Open-book MoJ
Alliance Agreement
and PPC2000
• Embed new models as business as usual
• Common construction procurement narrative
• Outline governance / support arrangements for roll out
• New group to oversee roll out programme (Winter 13/14)
– Central government department representative / end user
– Local government representative / end user
– Cabinet Office, trial project mentors, industry representative
– Non Execs: HMEP, BIM / GSL, BIS Industrial Strategy etc
• Publication of draft guidance (early 2014)
• Launch of guidance, support arrangements (July 2014)
UNCLASSIFIED
Roll Out of New Models of Procurement
Benchmarking Document: BSF Schools
UNCLASSIFIED
£-
£1,000
£2,000
£3,000
£4,000
£5,000
£6,000
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000
Cost
per
m2
GIFA (m2)
BSF 2009-10 Baseline Costs
Benchmarking Document: LA Schools
UNCLASSIFIED
Project Type: Secondary Schools Project
Subtypes Benchmarks Units 2012/13
(Baseline) Single point
average Range
20th-80th
Percentile
GIFA 0 - 2500 m2
Type 1: Total
construction
cost [1]
£/m2 2297 2132 2486
GIFA 2500-
5000 m2 £/m2 2107 Insuff.
data GIFA 5000-
7500 m2 £/m2 2284 Insuff.
data GIFA 7500-
10000 m2 £/m2 2402 Insuff.
data GIFA 10000-
12500 m2 £/m2 2345 2092
2565 GIFA 12500-
15000 m2 £/m2 2255 2154
2360
Project Type: Primary Schools
Project
Subtypes Benchmarks Units 2012/13
(Baseline) Single
point
average
Range 20th-80th
Percentile
GIFA 0 - 750 m2
Type 1: Total
construction
cost [1]
£/m2 2636 2555 2720
GIFA 750 -
1500 m2 £/m2 2746 2635
2886 GIFA 1500 -
2250 m2 £/m2 2586 2338
2897 GIFA 2250 -
3000 m2 £/m2 2714 2507
2955 GIFA 3000 -
3750 m2 £/m2 2570 2419
2721
Note [1]: Includes: External works, professional fees, fixed FF+E (fittings, furnishings and equipment); Excludes: Loose FF+E (fittings, furnishings and
equipment).
Other notes:
All prices have been brought to a common price base of Q3 2012.
All projects have been procured through local authority / regional frameworks and therefore represent a different set of projects to those presented in
Table 11 above which were procured through Local Education Partnerships (LEPs) and EFA’s Academies Framework.
Table 17: National Delivery Cost Benchmarking (prepared by Hampshire CC and Manchester City Council): New Build Schools
Benchmarking Document: Trend for DoH/P21
UNCLASSIFIED
Benchmarking Document: Trend for MoD (SLA)
UNCLASSIFIED
Benchmarking Document: Trend for HCA
UNCLASSIFIED
Q&A
Questions / Discussions
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/government-
construction
UNCLASSIFIED