GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental...
Transcript of GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental...
![Page 1: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 1/31
G O V E R N M E N T A N D P O L I C Y N E W S , N E W D E V E L O P M E N T , N O R T H A M E R I C A
![Page 2: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 2/31
This article provides a comprehensive review of the laws and federal actions that encouraged
hydropower development, beginning in the 1920s. Recent legislation and executive actions
beginning in 2013 make it evident there is a similar, if not more aggressive, movement to once
again revitalize the hydropower industry. Where the goal of government to diversify and
increase energy sources at a national level remains the same, public interest has shifted from
the initial hydropower era’s potential for economic improvement to this hydropower era’s
transitioning of the nation’s energy to clean, renewable sources.
By Anne E. Sibree
It has been a century since the Federal Water Power Act (now the Federal Power Act or FPA)
was enacted, and the U.S. is entering a second era of renewed interest in hydropower
development. This revitalization of hydropower development will be accomplished
through three ideals popular with the current administration, the industry and
communities alike: reduction of greenhouse gases; addition of reliable energy sources to
the grid; and less regulatory burden and cost to the industry. Increased hydropower
generation could alter the percentages of reliance on nonrenewable energy sources and
improve air quality. For example, based on the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA)
2018 e-GRID data, the Colorado region (all of Colorado, most of Wyoming, and western
portions of Nebraska and South Dakota), relies on 51.3% coal, 20.2% gas, 15.1% wind,
12.1% hydro, 0.8% solar, and 0.3% biomass.1 This region’s emissions exceed the
national average.1
Hydro Review: The Revitalizationof Hydropower10.16.19
![Page 3: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 3/31
The hydropower industry may soon see the regulatory reform and �nancial incentives it
has been seeking for many years. Within the past six years, there has been noticeable
recognition by the federal government of the importance and value of hydropower, as
demonstrated through legislative and executive actions to promote simpli�ed and more
e�cient authorizations for new or increased generation at hydropower projects.
The �rst section of this article describes the �rst hydropower era (1920 to 2010),
discussing federal actions that encouraged the development of hydropower from the
time the government began regulating its construction, operation and maintenance and
the changes made to the Federal Power Act over almost a century. The second section
describes the second hydropower era (2013 to today), discussing the recent revitalization
of hydropower development through legislation promoting e�cient authorizations of
hydropower projects that have, over time, become costly and time-consuming.
The underlying motivation of the federal government to develop national energy
resources remains the same, but the equally important element of public support has
shifted. In the �rst hydropower era, particularly during the time of the New Deal,
citizens were in favor of economic drivers and employment. Today, citizens are in favor
of reducing GHG emissions and altering the nation’s reliance on non-renewable energy
sources to clean, renewable energy sources.
![Page 4: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 4/31
This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of
renewable generation in each region of the U.S.
Federal government actions encouraging hydropower development in the �rst
hydropower era (1920-2010)
1. The 1920 Federal Water Power Act/1935 FPA
In 1920, the federal government began regulating nonfederal hydropower projects
through the Federal Water Power Act, amended in 1935 as the FPA.2 The Federal Power
Commission was given sole authority to issue licenses for the construction, operation
and maintenance of hydropower projects and to regulate interstate transmission and
sale of electricity.3 In 1950, this commission was terminated and its powers were
transferred to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).4
1930-1940 New Deal Era
To revive the U.S. economy after the Great Depression, President Franklin Roosevelt’s
New Deal era passed numerous acts and created new agencies — such as the Tennessee
Valley Authority, Public Works Administration, and Civil Work Administration —
leading to funding, employment and the construction of infrastructure and hydropower
facilities, including Bonneville and Grand Coulee dams.5
1978 Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act
Signi�cant changes to hydropower regulation came almost 40 years later, with the
Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), following on the heels of a wave of new
environmental laws (inter alia the National Environmental Policy Act or NEPA in 1969
and the 1972 amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Clean Water
Act or CWA). The FPA authorized FERC to grant licenses for all projects subject to the
FPA and to grant exemptions only for small conduit hydroelectric projects.6 PURPA
expanded FERC’s ability to grant exemptions to other projects. PURPA also de�ned
“small hydroelectric power projects” – projects 15 MW or less that use the water
potential of an existing dam or a natural water feature (e.g. natural lake, waterfall,
![Page 5: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 5/31
gradient of a stream) – and required FERC to develop a program for “simple and
expeditious licensing procedures” for these projects.7 In addition, it authorized FERC to
grant exemptions for a subset of small hydroelectric projects, at its discretion.
Exemption in this context does not mean that small hydropower projects determined
eligible will be exempt from federal jurisdiction or environmental review pursuant to
NEPA. Rather, these exemptions are, in fact, an order from FERC authorizing the
hydropower project, but they allow the project to operate without expiration and without
being subject to many FPA licensing requirements.
In addition to establishing small hydroelectric power project exemptions, PURPA
encouraged small power production by establishing how electric utilities are to interact
with small energy producers. It required electric utilities to purchase energy from small
hydropower producers at a rate equal to the cost of purchasing an equal amount of
energy from another source (de�ned as “avoided costs”) and to provide the project an
interconnect to the grid.8
Note: In April 2019, the Ninth Circuit added an important consideration when
calculating “avoided cost:” if the purchasing utility is meeting state renewable portfolio
standards from a renewable energy source, “avoided cost” should be the cost of an equal
amount of energy from “another renewable source,” as opposed to the cost of energy
from “another source.”9 This decision helps align rates paid to the hydroelectric power
developer with other renewable sources. On Sept. 19, 2019, FERC issued its proposed
revisions to PURPA that would change how and when rates for qualifying hydropower
producers would be established and would add circumstances when utilities are not
obligated to purchase such power.
1980 Energy Security Act
Two years later, Section 408 of the Energy Security Act of 1980 amended PURPA by
expanding the size of a “small hydroelectric project” from 15 MW to 30 MW, meaning
PURPA’s mandate for “simple and expeditious licensing procedures” will apply to
projects up to 30 MW. However, FERC has yet to promulgate “simple and expeditious
![Page 6: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 6/31
licensing procedures” speci�c to small hydroelectric projects. Additionally, the Energy
Security Act incorporated FERC’s discretionary small hydroelectric power project
exemption for projects 5 MW or less.10 Under this act, Congress also urged the secretary
of the Department of Energy (DOE) to study the development and commercialization of
“small scale” hydropower.
1986 Electric Consumers Protection Act
The Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986 amended the FPA by increasing the role of
state and federal �sh and wildlife agencies in the licensing process.11 FERC would be
required to give “equal consideration” to energy conservation and protection in addition
to mitigation of damages, enhancement of �sh and wildlife, protection of recreation and
preservation of environmental quality.11 These new considerations, though important,
would result in a more time-consuming and costly licensing process that often results in
a license that imposes numerous measures on the licensee. At the same time, however,
Congress asked for more studies on “small power production,” reminding us that under
PURPA, small hydropower projects should receive simple and expeditious licensing
procedures.
1992 MOU between FERC and the Bureau of Reclamation
In 1992, the Bureau of Reclamation and FERC signed a memorandum of understanding
(MOU) “for the expeditious non-Federal development of hydroelectric energy,”
whereby the agencies would identify the proper agency for authorizing hydropower
projects at Reclamation facilities.12 When a Reclamation facility is an “asset authorized
for federal hydropower development,” Reclamation will authorize hydropower
development in the form of a Lease of Power Privilege (LOPP).
Note: Reclamation’s authority over hydropower projects that use Reclamation facilities
would be expanded by Congress in 2013 through the Bureau of Reclamation Small Conduit
Hydropower Development and Rural Jobs Act (see section on 2013 Bureau of Reclamation
Small Conduit Hydropower Development and Rural Jobs below).
![Page 7: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 7/31
1992 and 2005 energy policy acts
The Energy Policy Act of 1992 set a goal to increase clean energy and reduce reliance on
imported energy, and it incentivized renewable energy projects through tax credits.13
Thirteen years later, attention was turned again to renewable energy incentives in the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005). However, the incentives for hydropower were
minimal.14 It was not until 2014 that Congress �nally appropriated funds under Section
242 of EPAct 2005, providing direct cash incentives for new small hydropower
generation using existing infrastructure. Unfortunately, the program expired only one
year later. Annual funding has continued to be available for projects that met the
quali�cations in 2014.
Nevertheless, Section 241 of EPAct 2005 amended Sections 4 and 18 of the FPA, sections
notorious in certain hydropower authorizations because of the sometimes costly and
unpredictable mandatory conditions imposed by resource agencies (e.g. the U.S. Forest
Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service).15 EPAct 2005 introduced a procedure for the
hydropower applicant to propose alternative conditions or request trial-type hearings
when there are factual disputes regarding those mandatory conditions. Additionally, it
eliminated the requirement under PURPA for a utility to purchase energy from a
qualifying facility if the hydropower producer has nondiscriminatory access to the
market, allowing the developer access to competitive rates.16
Shortly after EPAct 2005 was enacted, interim rules went into place implementing
procedures for the trial-type hearings. In 2016, the departments of Agriculture, Interior
and Commerce jointly issued �nal rules for these procedures.17 Although each agency’s
rules are substantially similar, each has its own.17 EPAct 2005 gave licensees the ability
to challenge or propose alternatives to mandatory hydropower conditions, over which
FERC has limited ability to challenge itself. These agency rules gave a licensee a set
procedure to follow, as well as a process that results in documentation of the resource
agency’s considerations regarding mandatory hydropower conditions.
Secure Water Act of 2009
![Page 8: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 8/31
In 2009, the Secure Water Act was passed, requiring more collaboration among the
federal water agencies.18 It also asked DOE to report the impacts of global climate
change on hydropower generation to Congress every �ve years.18 The �rst report was
issued in 2013, with a second report following in 2017 (see 2013 Department of Energy’s
Climate Report below).
1. 2010 multi-agency MOU
In 2010, the departments of Energy, Interior and Army signed a “Memorandum of
Understanding for Hydropower.”19 Through partnership and collaboration, the agencies
agreed to “harmonize the production of clean, renewable power generation with
avoidance or reduction of environmental impacts and maintenance or enhancement of
the viability of ecosystems.”19 In 2015, the MOU was extended �ve years, implementing
a Phase II Action Plan, and committing to continue to improve regulatory processes for
hydropower development.20 The extension provided that “the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the Department of Energy intend to work collaboratively with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission to improve regulatory e�ciency for private and
municipal development and operation of power facilities at the U.S Army Corps of
Engineers non-powered dams.”20
Federal government e�orts to revitalize hydropower in the second hydropower era
(2013-today)
In 2013, we see the beginning of a new hydropower era with renewed momentum at a
federal level to revitalize hydropower development. Every year since has brought
exciting changes to regulations regarding authorizations and the procedures to acquire
authorization for new or increased hydropower production.
![Page 9: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 9/31
Executive summary of Hydropower Vision: A New Chapter for America�s 1st Renewable Electricity Source, an
analysis of the sustainable expansion of hydropower.
This map from the U.S. Department of Energy shows the status of hydropower ownership in
the U.S.
1. 2013 Hydropower Regulatory E�ciency Act
One of the most signi�cant laws to change the regulatory landscape since PURPA was the
Hydropower Regulatory E�ciency Act (HREA) in 2013. With its goal to reduce costs and
regulatory burdens during licensing, this law provided a boost to hydropower
development in numerous ways. First, it increased the maximum installed capacity for
small hydroelectric power project exemptions from 5 MW to 10 MW.21 Second, it
amended Section 30 of the FPA’s de�nition of small conduit hydroelectric facility
exemptions, now allowing these projects on both federal and non-federal lands, and
increased this exemption’s maximum installed capacity from 15 MW to 40 MW (an
amount that had previously only been available to municipal conduits).22
Third, and perhaps most signi�cant, it codi�ed FERC’s regulatory determination in 2010
that a subset of small conduit exemptions called “qualifying conduit hydropower
facilities” are truly exempt from regulation under the FPA. A qualifying conduit
![Page 10: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 10/31
hydropower facility is a conduit hydropower project 5 MW or less located on an existing,
non-federal conduit that is used for municipal, agricultural or industrial purposes.23
FERC evaluates these projects solely on the basis of their eligibility as a “qualifying
facility.” The hydropower developer merely submits a notice of intent (NOI) to FERC for
con�rmation that the project quali�es to move forward without additional evaluation or
authorization.
Last, Congress tasked FERC with investigating the feasibility of authorizing new
hydropower development at non-powered dams and closed-loop pump storage projects
within a two-year timeframe.
Note: Subsequently, FERC explored this endeavor through a pilot project for each type of
hydropower development.24 In 2017, FERC’s report to Congress concluded that without
necessitating change to its regulations (i.e. the licensing processes), authorizations
could be accomplished in two-year’s time as demonstrated through the pilot projects.25
Two years later, in April 2019, FERC issued regulations for a two-year licensing process
for non-powered, existing dam projects and closed-loop pump storage projects (see
2019 expedited licensing for existing non-powered dam and closed loop pump storage
projects below).
2013 Bureau of Reclamation Small Conduit Hydropower Development and Rural Jobs
Act
In the same year as the HREA, another signi�cant game-changer for hydropower
development came by way of the Bureau of Reclamation Small Conduit Hydropower
Development and Rural Jobs Act. 26 Recall that in 1992 Reclamation and FERC signed an
MOU distinguishing the agencies’ regulatory authorities for certain hydropower projects
on Reclamation facilities. The MOU provided that assets authorized for federal
hydropower developments were within Reclamation’s jurisdiction, but Reclamation
assets that had not been authorized for federal hydropower development would be under
FERC’s jurisdiction. In 2013, Congress made this determination simpler, giving
jurisdiction over all hydropower development using existing Reclamation conduits (i.e.
![Page 11: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 11/31
even if it was not authorized for federal hydropower development) to Reclamation
through issuance of a LOPP.26 It also provided that hydropower development using
Reclamation dams can proceed through a LOPP or a FERC license, per the 1992 MOU, but
shall only require one authorization unless there are multiple federal assets involved.
This act amended the Federal Reclamation Law and was described as giving local
irrigation districts and water agencies a “permanent process … [to] develop this very
valuable, renewable carbon-free energy at our reclamation facilities.”27 In recognizing
“the beauty of this hydropower legislation … used on much smaller scaled, reliable
projects in which we already have the infrastructure in place,” this would help
streamline those hydropower projects through Reclamation’s regulations.27
2013 Department of Energy’s Climate Report
Pursuant to the Secure Water Act of 2009, DOE reported in 2013 that signi�cant changes in
temperature had occurred in all regions of the country.28 The report also drew a direct
correlation between the variability of runo� and the variability of hydropower
generation.28 Except for the Rio Grande and Apalachicola rivers, “the annual generation
in assessment areas was highly correlated with observed runo� values (observed data
from USGS).”28 Additionally, the report described the bene�t of large water storage
reservoirs in the West, helping to spread out the variability of runo�/hydropower
generation. “In four of the areas in Western’s region, generation was more related to
multi-year runo� than single-year runo�.”28 The report also concluded that the e�ects
of climate change on annual hydropower generation were not signi�cant. In the 2017
report, DOE reported that some regions of the country showed “signi�cant to negligible
changes, which can be further explained by watershed storage. Watershed storage may
provide a bu�er to help absorb part of the runo� variability, resulting in a stable future
annual hydropower projection that supports the result in the �rst study, which used
di�erent modeling methods.”29 The 2017 report concluded that “with the relatively
large storage capacity at many U.S. federal hydropower reservoirs, the �eet is likely to be
able to absorb part of the runo� variability and hence may continue to provide stable
annual hydropower generation in the projected near-term and midterm future periods,”
![Page 12: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 12/31
and that “change in federal hydropower production is mainly controlled by precipitation
and runo� and indirectly by temperature.”29
2014 Water Resources Reform and Development Act
In Section 1008 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act in 2014, Congress
declared that “it is the policy of the United States that— (1) the development of non-
Federal hydroelectric power at Corps of Engineers civil works projects, including locks
and dams, shall be given priority; (2) Corps of Engineers approval of non-Federal
hydroelectric power at Corps of Engineers civil works projects, including permitting
required under section 14 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (The Rivers and Harbors Act, 33
U.S.C. §408), shall be completed by the Corps of Engineers in a timely and consistent
manner.”30 Still, however, neither Congress nor FERC has granted or delegated
authority to the Corps to issue hydropower authorizations using Corps facilities
equivalent to Reclamation’s authority. Therefore, although two agency authorizations
will be required for projects developed at Corps facilities, this act and the 2016 MOU (see
2015 FAST 41 below) requires e�cient and coordinated review by the agencies.
2015 Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act
In 2015, Congress again extended Reclamation’s authority under the Bureau of
Reclamation Small Conduit Hydropower Development and Rural Jobs Act to issue a LOPP for
conduit hydropower projects using Reclamation facilities (see 1992 and 2005 energy
policy acts above) to more broadly apply to all water resource assets of Reclamation that
were constructed under the 1939 Water Conservation and Utilization Act (WCUA).31 Thus,
now all non-federal hydropower projects that use a WCUA Reclamation asset can acquire
hydropower authorization through a Reclamation LOPP procedure rather than a FERC
license.
Note: Reclamation posts a list of facilities available for development, with the most
recent list issued in August 2018.32 As an example, using assessment data from 2011 and
2012, Reclamation identi�es 48 facility-sites in Colorado that are available for
![Page 13: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 13/31
development.33 “Twenty of those sites have a high cost-bene�t ratio, and in total, those
twenty sites could produce 46,647 kW.”33
2015 FAST 41
Also enacted in 2015 was Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act.34 Title 41, referred
to as “the FAST-41,” established that agency coordination and consultation for
permitting and environmental review must be made more e�cient through project-
speci�c timelines for eligible FAST-41 projects. To be eligible, a proposal must meet the
de�nition of a “covered project” under the statute. A FAST-41 hydropower project is one
that: 1) involves the construction of a non-federal hydropower facility that is subject to
NEPA; and 2) is likely to require a total investment of more than $200,000,000.34
2016 MOU between FERC and the Corps
In 2016, the Corps and FERC entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on Non-
Federal Hydropower Projects to coordinate their respective regulatory processes under
NEPA.35 This MOU establishes FERC as the lead agency and sets forth how the agencies
are to coordinate during the preparation of NEPA documents. It also commits the parties
to complete the NEPA documents according to FERC’s process schedule with “speci�c
and expeditious timeframes for licensing.”35
2017 DOE report on hydropower development in canals
DOE’s e�orts to promote and in�uence hydropower initiatives are key to the industry’s
progress. Through its Water Power Technologies O�ce, DOE is dedicated to researching,
funding and cost-sharing projects to advance clean energy e�orts, including
hydropower.36 In 2017, DOE released a report describing how to evaluate facilities and
performance when considering hydropower development on canals and open
channels.37 Considerations include the structure of canals best-suited for hydropower
units and potential e�ects on existing canals when hydropower is added to unlined
channels (e.g., increased water levels, changes in �ow, changes in channel morphology
and turbidity).
![Page 14: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 14/31
DOE releases an annual hydropower market update, with the most recent (2018) data
released in May 2019, providing interesting statistics about annual hydropower
increases and types of authorizations issued over the years.38 And, in April 2019 DOE
committed more than $20 million towards new hydropower, hydrokinetic and marine
power technologies.39
1. 2017 Executive Order on promoting energy independence and economic growth
In March 2017, Executive Order No. 13783 was issued, promoting energy independence
by holding other regulatory agencies accountable to the lead agency’s review and
approval timelines to authorize energy infrastructure. “To enable the timely
construction of the infrastructure needed to move our energy resources through
domestic and international commerce, the Federal Government must promote e�cient
permitting processes and reduce regulatory uncertainties that make energy
infrastructure projects expensive and discourage new investment.”40 This Executive
Order asked agencies to review their regulations, orders, guidance and policies to
determine which ones potentially burden the development of domestic energy sources.
2017 FERC’s policy on license terms and its �nal report responding to Executive
Order 13783
In October 2017, FERC issued a policy statement regarding license terms. The FPA limits
licenses to a maximum of 50 years.41 FERC’s policy sets a 40-year term for licenses as
the default. A few weeks later, FERC issued its “voluntary” report (because it is an
independent regulatory agency not subject to Executive Order 13783), listing nine FERC
actions that “potentially materially burden the development or use of domestic energy
resources.” 42Seven of the nine items pertain to hydropower authorizations. Thus, the
hydropower industry can anticipate the following regulatory or policy changes.
First, FERC identi�ed a burden associated with assigning the Integrated Licensing
Process (ILP) as the default process, which results in additional time and cost in the
process for a project proponent who wants to use a di�erent licensing process because
the proponent must request FERC’s approval. It recognized that the ILP could be
![Page 15: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 15/31
optional, with no authorization from FERC required to use any of the three licensing
processes.43 A second regulatory “�x” is to eliminate the requirement for, and make
optional, sharing a copy of the draft license or exemption application with stakeholders
for review and comment before �ling the application with FERC.43 Third, review and
comment periods during the ILP could be made shorter to reduce the overall 3 to 3 ½
year total licensing process.43 Fourth, license terms, which are discretionary so long as
they do not exceed the FPA’s maximum term of 50 years, could be extended from the
frequently used 30- and 40-year terms (by the time this report was issued, FERC had
already acted on this �x). Fifth, hydropower application �ling requirements could be
simpli�ed for projects under 10 MW.
The sixth identi�ed “burden” to �x could have signi�cant bene�t to many small
hydropower licensees whose licenses are nearing expiration. FERC recognized that the
regulatory requirement to add generating capacity to qualify for a small hydroelectric
power project exemption of 10 MW or less could be eliminated. This would allow small
hydropower projects to continue operating in perpetuity under the terms of an
exemption order. Nevertheless, until this regulatory change is made, existing licensees
should contemplate the option of converting a license to an exemption by adding
generating capacity if it is economically viable. At least one municipal licensee has
converted a license to an exemption by adding capacity.44
Seventh, FERC’s regulations require an applicant whose exemption application is denied
to subsequently submit a license application rather than FERC sta� simply requesting
any additional information necessary to consider the submittal as a license application.
This regulatory change has also not happened, but other ways to �le an application have
been used, including �ling a dual application in which FERC is asked to �rst consider the
application for exemption and, if for whatever reason it is denied, to consider the
simultaneously �led, and likely very similar, application for a license.45 In fact, the
current regulations describe this approach.46 Last, FERC acknowledged that its
prohibition on re�ling an application after the �rst application is denied during re-
![Page 16: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 16/31
relicensing could be eliminated, which would allow the licensee to correct de�ciencies
and resubmit its application if it wishes to proceed with its project.
2017 Executive Order on One Federal Decision
On August 15, 2017, President Trump issued Executive Order No. 13807, “Establishing
Discipline and Accountability in the Environmental Review and Permitting for
Infrastructure Projects.”47 Major infrastructure projects involving multiple agencies
will be issued a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and a single Record of
Decision (ROD) signed by all agencies with authorization, environmental review or
consultation responsibilities, with authorizations from each agency following 90 days
later.47 All of this is to be done within two years from publication of the NOI to prepare
an EIS.48 Federal agencies signed a Memorandum of Understanding Implementing One
Federal Decision. FERC, as well as other agencies, committed to complete the necessary
environmental reviews and authorizations for “major infrastructure projects” (projects
requiring multiple federal authorizations) within two years.49
2017 Secretarial Order 3355 – Streamlining NEPA
On August 31, 2017, Interior Secretary David Bernhardt signed Secretarial Order 3355,
implementing One Federal Decision (Executive Order 13807) to improve NEPA review
processes, with page and time limits for an EIS. Under this guidance, when Reclamation
is the lead agency for hydropower authorization it will strive to complete an EIS within
one year from the date of issuance of the NOI to prepare an EIS.
2018 America’s Water Infrastructure Act
Signed into law in 2018, America’s Water Infrastructure Act tasked FERC with multiple
improvements under the current regulatory regime.50 It required FERC to: 1) establish a
two-year decision process for qualifying facilities at existing non-powered dams; 2)
develop a list of non-powered Federal dams with the greatest potential for hydropower
development; 3) create a two-year decision process for licensing of closed-loop pumped
storage projects; and 4) explore development opportunities for closed-loop pump
![Page 17: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 17/31
storage projects at abandoned mine sites. Twenty-one days later, FERC issued a notice
setting a schedule to accomplish these tasks.51
Note: During the time that FERC was developing regulatory e�ciencies pursuant to the
AWIA, the courts resolved an important issue about delays that occur during licensing
that are beyond FERC’s control. In N.Y. State Dep’t of Environmental Conservation v.
FERC, FERC took the position that the state’s water quality department waived its CWA
Section 401 water quality certi�cation authority when it failed to act on a CWA Section
401 application within one year.52 The Second Circuit court of appeals agreed with FERC,
holding that Section 401 of the CWA outlines a “bright line” mandate that a state has one
year to review a request for water quality certi�cation under Section 401, and if action is
not taken within that timeframe, the state has waived its certi�cation requirements.53
The court noted that an applicant could withdraw and resubmit its application to the
state department, which would start the one-year clock anew.
However, in a similar case before the D.C. Circuit in 2019, the court rejected the Second
Circuit’s suggested approach to restart the clock by resubmitting an application, saying
that withdrawal and resubmission of a CWA Section 401 application does not trigger a
new statutory period of review when the application that is being withdrawn and
resubmitted is essentially the same.54 Describing the approach as an “attempt to
circumvent FERC’s regulatory authority” of whether and when to issue a federal license,
the court put its foot down on regulatory delays a�ecting FERC’s licensing authority and
took a step further than the Second Circuit in enforcing the one-year CWA Section 401
certi�cation review period. This issue was being heard by the court during the time FERC
was �nalizing its expedited licensing process rule, and the issue is clearly carried over in
that rule. The ELP rule requires a hydropower applicant to submit to FERC a copy of its
request for a CWA Section 401 certi�cation, including proof of the date it was received by
the state, or a copy of the certi�cation or waiver at the same time it submits its
hydropower application to FERC.55
Also under the AWIA is a provision to encourage hydropower owners to make
improvements to their existing projects rather than wait until re-licensing. This AWIA
![Page 18: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 18/31
provision gives “credit” for investments made to a currently licensed project by
extending, upon request to FERC, the term of the existing license. For example, a
licensee could replace a runner with a new, more e�cient runner, increasing production
of kilowatt-hours (though not increasing the overall generating capacity) and seek from
FERC a 10-year extension on the term of its 40-year license. FERC’s policy statement on
extending the term of an existing license provides, “The Commission will consider, on a
case-by-case basis, measures and actions that enhance non-developmental project
purposes (i.e., environmental, project recreation, water supply), and those that enhance
power and developmental purposes, together with the cost of those measures and
actions to determine whether they are signi�cant and warrant the granting of a longer
license term. Maintenance measures and measures taken to support the licensing
process will not be considered.”56
2019 Executive Order on Promoting Energy Infrastructure and Economic Growth
Next came an April 2019 Executive Order, “Promoting Energy Infrastructure and
Economic Growth,” issued to “enable the timely construction of the infrastructure
needed to move our energy resources through domestic and international commerce” by
promoting “e�cient permitting processes and reduc[ing] regulatory uncertainties.” In
furtherance of promoting private investment in energy infrastructure, the EPA was
charged with reviewing CWA Section 401 Certi�cation rules, policies and procedures and
developing new guidance and proposed rules within 13 months after this Executive
Order.56 Additionally, for energy infrastructure requiring rights-of-way from federal
land managers, there shall be developed a “master agreement for energy infrastructure
that will enable timely and e�cient renewals when those permits expire.”56
Note: EPA issued its proposed rules revising CWA Section 401 certi�cations on August 8,
2019, published in the Federal Register on August 22, 2019.57
2019 expedited licensing for existing non-powered dam and closed loop pump
storage projects
![Page 19: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 19/31
Also in April 2019, FERC issued its rule for expedited decisions. FERC states that its new
regulations setting forth expedited licensing decisions for “qualifying facilities” and
closed-loop pumped storage projects “ful�lls the spirit of the One Federal Decision
MOU.”58 This does not add a fourth licensing process but rather asks that FERC expedite
its decision after the applicant has selected its preferred licensing process (from one of
three existing licensing procedures, each requiring pre-�ling consultation with agencies
and stakeholders). Expedited licensing begins after an applicant has submitted a license
application, and it may be used for two types of hydropower projects: qualifying
facilities at existing, non-powered dams and closed-loop pump storage projects.
Expedited licensing ensures a decision from FERC within two years from the date of
application.59 It is available only for an original license (i.e. it does not apply for project
re-licensing or exemption), and an applicant must request FERC to use the expedited
process. In the preamble to this rule, FERC noted that this expedited process could also
be used for projects qualifying as “major infrastructure projects” subject to the One
Federal Decision MOU.58
Conclusion
At the federal level, all three branches have taken recent steps to promote streamlined
hydropower authorizations and encourage development of hydroelectric energy. Soon
we should see a public list of non-powered federal dams with the greatest potential for
hydropower development from FERC (which was anticipated in August 2019), FERC’s
guidance on closed-loop pumped storage projects at abandoned mine sites (anticipated
in September 2019) and EPA’s �nal CWA Section 401 regulations.
The appeal of hydropower energy is not going away. After the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change report in 2018, we are likely to see various bills in the coming years
with titles including “clean,” “green,” and “renewable” to promote the country’s
conversion from non-renewable to renewable energy sources. For instance, in February
2019 Representative Ocasio-Cortez introduced the New Green Deal, and in May 2019
Senator Wyden introduced the Clean Energy for America Act. Hydropower development
will certainly be key to achieving these goals.
![Page 20: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 20/31
The recent mandates for streamlined authorizations and environmental reviews
combined with the ever-growing desire to reducing GHG emissions make certain an
increased demand for renewable energy sources. Hydropower is key to near-term
achievements towards ambitious local and statewide goals to become 100% reliant on
renewable energy sources.
Anne E. Sibree is Of Counsel with law �rm Trout Raley Montano Freeman Sinor
Thompson. She advises clients through the various phases of project planning,
permitting, construction and permit compliance with regard to environmental and
natural resources laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act, Clean Water Act,
Endangered Species Act and Federal Power Act.
Notes
1 Power Pro�ler, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
D.C.,https://www.epa.gov/energy/power-pro�ler (accessed August 6, 2019)
2 16 U.S.C. § 791 et. seq.
3 16 U.S.C. §§ 791-828
4 Historical note to 16 U.S.C. §797
5 The Living New Deal, https://livingnewdeal.org/what-was-the-new-deal/timeline/
(accessed July 3, 2019), and National Archives at Seattle: The Great Depression and the
New Deal, https://www.archives.gov/seattle/exhibit/picturing-the-century/great-
depression.html (accessed July 3, 2019)
6 FPA §30, 16 U.S.C §823a
7 Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act of 1978, 16 U.S.C. § 2705 (2012)
8 16 U.S.C. 796(17)(C)
9 Californians for Renewable Energy v California Pub. Util. Comm’n, 922 F.3d 929, 937 (9
Cir. 2019)
th
![Page 21: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 21/31
10 Energy Security Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-294 (1980)
11 Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-495 (1986)
12 Memorandum of Understanding Between the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
and the Bureau of Reclamation Department of the Interior for the Early Resolution of
Issues Related to the Timely Development of Non-Federal Hydroelectric Power at
Bureau of Reclamation Facilities, November 6, 1992.
13 Energy Policy Act of 1992, Pub. L. No. 202-486 (1992)
14 Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58 (2005) and Energy Policy Act of
2005 Fact Sheet, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (August 8, 2006)
15 See e.g. 16 U.S.C. § 797(e) (authorizing the federal land management agency to impose
mandatory conditions on a license when the project involves federal facilities or lands).
16 16 U.S.C. § 824a-3(m)
17 81 Fed. Reg. 84389 (November 23, 2016)
18 Secure Water Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-11 (2009)
19 Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower, March 24, 2015
20 Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower Sustainable Hydropower Action
Plan (Phase II), Executive Summary at 3 (March 2015)
21 16 U.S.C. §2707, as amended by the Hydropower Regulatory E�ciency Act of 2013,
Pub. L. No. 113-23,3
22 16 U.S.C. § 823(a) (2012), as amended by Pub. L. No 113-23, §4.
23 Pub. L. No. 113-23, §3
24 Pub. L. No. 113-23, §6
![Page 22: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 22/31
25 Report on The Pilot Two-Year Hydroelectric Licensing Process for Non-Powered
Dams and Closed-Loop Pumped Storage Projects and Recommendations Pursuant to
Section 6 of the Hydropower Regulatory E�ciency Act of 2013, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (May 2017).
26 Bureau of Reclamation Small Conduit Hydropower Development and Rural Jobs Act of
2013, Pub. L. No. 113-24 (2013)
27 H.R. 678, �oor speech by Representative Jim Costa, April 10, 2013.
28 E�ects of Climate Change on Federal Hydropower, Department of Energy, 8 (August
2013)
29 E�ects of Climate Change on Federal Hydropower, Second Report to Congress,
Department of Energy, 6 (January 2017)
30 Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014, Pub. L. No. 113-121 (2014), Sec.
1008
31 Levin, Carl, and Howard P. Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act of 2015,
Pub L. No. 113-291 (2015)
32 Bureau of Reclamation Resource Assessment Sites Available for Development,
https://www.usbr.gov/power/ResourceAssessment/2018_Available_Sites_8-17-18.pdf
(last visited August 6, 2019)
33 Bureau of Reclamation. Hydropower Program,
https://www.usbr.gov/power/AssessmentReport/ (last visited August 6, 2019)
34 Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-94 (2015)
35 Memorandum of Understanding between the United States Army Corps of Engineers
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Non-Federal Hydropower Projects
(July 20, 2016).
![Page 23: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 23/31
36 Department of Energy, About the Water Power Technologies O�ce (WPTO),
https://www.energy.gov/eere/water/about-water-power-program (last visited August
7, 2019)
37 Assessing and Testing Hydrokinetic Turbine Performance and E�ects on Open Channel
Hydrodynamics: An Irrigation Canal Case Study, Department of Energy. March 2017
38 Department of Energy, Hydropower Market Report,
https://www.energy.gov/eere/water/hydropower-market-report (last visited August 7,
2019)
39 Department of Energy, DOE Announces Up to 261 Million to Advance Hydropower and
Marine Energy, https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-announces-261-million-advance-
hydropower-and-marine-energy
40 Exec. Order No. 13783, 82 Fed. Reg. 16093 (2017)
41 161 FERC ¶ 61,078 (October 19, 2017)
42 82 Fed. Reg. 50517 (November 1, 2017)
43 82 Fed. Reg. 50519 (November 1, 2017)
44 116 FERC ¶ 62, 244 (September 29, 2006)
45 116 FERC ¶ 62, 244 (September 29, 2006) This was the approach used for the
Williams Fork project, which was the �rst project to convert a license to exemption by
adding generating capacity to qualify.
46 18 CFR §4.33(d) (providing that if there an unexpired permit or license in e�ect for
the project, FERC will accept an application from the licensee for exemption of that
project)
47 82 Fed Reg. 40,463 (August 24, 2017)
![Page 24: GOVERNMENT AND POLICY NEWS, NEW DEVELOPMENT, NORTH … · This map, from the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, shows the percentage of renewable generation in each region](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022050118/5f4e59ce15c8bb1bec272c0d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
11/5/2019 Hydro Review: The Revitalization of Hydropower - Hydro Review
https://www.hydroreview.com/2019/10/16/hydro-review-the-revitalization-of-hydropower/ 24/31
48 Exec. Order No. 13807, 82 Fed. Reg. 40463 (2017). Agencies may exceed these
timelines by following certain protocols or choose not to do a single EIS/ROD under
circumstances that are identi�ed in E.O. 13807.
49 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
https://www.ferc.gov/legal/mou/2018/MOU-One-Federal-Decision.pdf (last visited
August 7, 2019)
50 America’s Water Infrastructure Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-270 (2018)
51 83 Fed. Reg. 58243 (2018).
52 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation v. Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 884 F.3d 450 (2d Cir. 2018)
53 33 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(1)
54 Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 913 F.3d 1099 (D.C. Cir.
2019)
55 167 FERC ¶ 61,050 at 51-53.
56 161 FERC ¶ 61,078 (October 19, 2017)
57 84 Fed. Reg. 44080 (2019)
58 FERC Final Rule 18 CFR Pt. 7, Hydroelectric Licensing Regulations Under the America’s
Water Infrastructure Act of 2018, Order No. 858, 167 FERC ¶ 61,050 (2018) at P 115 (p 55)
59 FERC Final Rule 18 CFR Pt. 7, Hydroelectric Licensing Regulations Under the America’s
Water Infrastructure Act of 2018, Order No. 858, 167 FERC ¶ 61,050 (2018)