GO_NA18_E1_1 GSM TCH Assignment Failure & Solutions-22
-
Upload
lechihuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
159 -
download
5
Transcript of GO_NA18_E1_1 GSM TCH Assignment Failure & Solutions-22
GSM TCH Assignment Failure & Solutions
Zte university
Training goals
This guidebook mainly describes TCH allocation failure and investigation of the problem.
Contents
TCH Assignment Failure & Investigation Relevant Counters & Assignment success Rate Typical Cases
Definition of TCH assignment failure
It refers to the number of TCH call attempts after MS occupies SDCCH;
The statistics counted is the number of “Assignment Request” sent from MSC to BSC.
number of busy hour TCH call attempts (excl. HO)
It refers to the number of calls when MS fails to occupy TCH after it seizes SDCCH.
The statistics gathered is “Assignment Failure + Clear
Request (radio interface failure)”. Allocation failure may be
caused due to lack of TCHs or problems on lower layers.
Number of busy hour TCH assignment failures (excl. HO)
MS fails to access into TCH after it sends out request for TCH
assignment to BSC.
Definition of TCH assignment failure
BSC
Assi gnment Command
Channel Acti vati on
Channel Acti vati onAck
Assi gnment Fai l ure(1)
MSC BTS Ms
Assi gnment Request
Assi gnment Fai l ure(2)
Assi gnment Command
SABM
UA
Assi gnment Compl eteAssi gnment Compl eteAssi gnment Compl ete
Assi gnment Fai l ure(3)
Remarks:Assi gnment Fai l ure(1):BSC can’ t compl ete MSC’ s request f or TCHAssi gnment Fai l ure(2):BTS can’ t compl ete MSC’ s request f or TCH
Assi gnment Fai l ure(3):MS i s not abl e to occupy TCH assi gned by BSC
Main causes of TCH allocation failureTraffic congestion in cellsTraffic congestion in cells
Hardware problemHardware problem
Co-channel or adjacent channel interference Co-channel or adjacent channel interference
Antenna feeder problem Antenna feeder problem
Unreasonable setting of parametersUnreasonable setting of parameters
Transmission problem at A interface or Abis interface Transmission problem at A interface or Abis interface
Influence of repeater Influence of repeater
TCH allocation failureTCH allocation failure
Problem handling procedures
Check hardware Check hardware
Check if traffic congestion exists Check if traffic
congestion exists
Check if radio parameters areset reasonable
Check if radio parameters areset reasonable
Check indicators like BER, idle interference
band class
Check indicators like BER, idle interference
band class
Check antenna system
Check antenna system
TC
H a
ssig
nm
en
t fa
ilure
Contents
TCH Assignment Failure & Investigation Relevant Counters & Assignment success
Rate Typical Cases
Relevant counters_V2
C11609 total number of attempts for TCH (excl.HO)
C11653 total number of successful TCH assignments (excl.HO)
Definition: It represents the total number of attempts to acquire TCHs (seizure attempts) after all SDCCHs in cells are seized. It includes MOC and MTC, and very early assignment of TCH as SDCCH, but handovers are excluded. TCH falls into TCH/F and TCH/H.
Definition: It represents the number of received activation response messages after channels are activated for TCH assignment (signaling, speech and data).
Relevant counters_V2
C11654 total number of TCH
allocation failures (excl.HO)total number of unsuccessful TCH
assignments (excl.HO)
Definition: It represents the number of negative replies in response to TCH activation request for assignment or the number of activation acknowledge which haven’t been received (signaling, voice and data).
Definition: It represents the number of negative replies in response to TCH assignment command (signaling, speech and data), or the number of unreceived “Establish Indication” or “Assignment Complete”.
Relevant counters_V3 & TCH assignment success rate
KPI TCH allocation success rate(%)(exclude handover)
Definition Number of TCH assignment success times (excl. HO)/number of TCH assignment attempts (excl. HO)
Counter formula
V2(1- ( C11654+C11610+C11658 ) / C11609)*100%
V3
V6.0
(C100030017+C100030028+C100030036+C100030235 +C100030199+C100030210)*100%/(C100030010+C100030019+C100030030+C100030038+C100030042+C100030046)
V6.2
(C900060017+C900060028+C900060036+C900060235 +C900060199+C900060210)*100%/(C900060010+C900060019+C900060030+C900060038+C900060042+C900060046)
Contents
TCH Assignment Failure & Investigation Relevant Counters & Assignment success Rate Typical Cases
Low TCH allocation success rate in a cell
Indicator statistics at OMCR showed that TCH allocation success rate was low in Cell2 under BTS D1A.
Checked radio parameters, but no problem was found. From the dynamic management at OMCR, we found that one TRX in the cell couldn't be seized.
We confirmed the TRX has problem. After the TRX board with problem was replaced, TCH allocation success rate increased greatly and problem was solved.
1 2 3
Problem description
Problem analysis
Adjustment
Low TCH allocation success rate in a cell
Total number of TCH allocation requests
Total number of TCH Allocation success
TCH Requests success rate
Antenna connection problem
TCH allocation success rate was low in Cell1 in an area, which was below 94.0%.
From analysis of OMCR performance indicators, we found the problem was caused by the low TCH assignment success rate at air interface. From further analysis, we found the assignment failure rate of TRX3 was high (Maio=2), and DL signal was weak
Hardware engineers went to the site and checked, finding that antenna system was connected wrong (the TRX3 of Cell1 was connected to the antenna of Cell2.)
1 2 3
Problem description
Problem analysis
Adjustment
Antenna connection problem
Antenna connection problem
Change LAPD
TCH assignment success rate was low in three cells under a BTS (S111), just around 10%.
We made CQT on site and found that call completion rate was very low during idle hours, just one or two out of ten was completed. From hardware checking, no problem was found. Therefore, we confirmed it’s caused by LAPD timeslot problem.
Changed LAPD from 1:4 multiplex to non-multiplex. The TCH assignment success rate improved from 10% to 99%.
1 2 3
Problem description
Problem analysis
Adjustment
Interference within network
Performance statistics showed that TCH assignment failure rate was high in Cell2 and Cell3, which led to low TCH allocation success rate.
From the planning software, we could see the two cells were right opposite each other, and their overlapped coverage area was large, and co-channel existed, thus TCH assignment failure rate was high
After we changed frequency point in Cell3 from 119 to 101, number of TCH assignment failures in the two cells reduced greatly, from 20times/h to 1time/hour.
1 2 3
Problem description
Problem analysis
Adjustment
Discrepancy in time at BSC and OMCR
A customer reported that call completion rate exceeded 100%, almost reached115%.
Analysis of basic measurement data showed that Sum of CallProceeding and CallConfirm was 4955, while that measured by customer was 9428. We found that time at BSC was 5mins 30secs behind the time at OMCR.
We adjusted time at OMCR and renewed data of OMCR with PMDR, and the data in OMCR and signaling device conformed to each other
1 2 3
Problem description
Problem analysis
Adjustment
Questions for thinking
Which parameters can influence TCH allocation success rate?
Please introduce counters and signaling statistical points relating to TCH allocation success rate.