God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

40
Sovereignty Free Will & Salvation

description

This presentation is the first part in a series that examines how God's sovereignty can be reconciled with human free will. It looks at the history of the debate and the main areas of discussion.

Transcript of God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

Page 1: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

Sovereignty

Free Will &

Salvation

Page 2: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

Is everyone going to be saved?

Page 3: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

The History of Unitarian Universalism

In the sixteenth century, Laelius Socinus and his nephew Faustus revived the fourth

century heresy of Arianism and taught that the Trinity was a false doctrine and that Christ was not God. In that sense, they were “Unitarian” in their teaching.

But they went further and said that some of God‟s attributes were optional and not

necessary. They claimed that God‟s justice is optional, but is mercy is

mandatory. Therefore, if justice is optional and mercy mandatory, then according to Socinianism, all people will be saved by

God. In this respect, they were “universalists”.

Page 4: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

Answer: No, there will be few saved, many lost

“Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it. “For the gate is

small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it. ” (Matthew 7:13–14)

“Many will say to Me on that day, „Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many

miracles?‟ “And then I will declare to them, „I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness.‟ ” (Matthew 7:22–23)

Page 5: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

Answer: No, there will be few saved, many lost

“Then I saw a great white throne and Him who sat upon it, from whose presence earth and heaven fled away, and no place was found for them. And I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne, and books were opened; and another book was opened, which is the book of life; and the dead were judged from the things which

were written in the books, according to their deeds. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead which were in them; and they were

judged, every one of them according to their deeds. Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. And if anyone‟s

name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire. ” (Revelation 20:11–15)

Page 6: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

Who decided that the plan of salvation included the fact that few would be saved

and many lost?

Page 7: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

Answer: God Decided the plan

“For indeed, the Son of Man is going as it has been determined; but woe to that man by whom He is

betrayed!” ” (Luke 22:22)

“this Man [Jesus], delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you

nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death. ” (Acts 2:23)

“But the things which God announced beforehand by the mouth of all the prophets, that His Christ would suffer, He has thus fulfilled. ” (Acts 3:18)

“For truly in this city there were gathered together against Your holy servant Jesus, whom You

anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do

whatever Your hand and Your purpose predestined to occur. ” (Acts 4:27–28)

Page 8: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

Who ultimately determines who is going to be saved?

Page 9: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

Is it Ultimately God or Us?

“But we should always give thanks to God for you, brethren beloved by the Lord, because God has

chosen you from the beginning for salvation

through sanctification by the Spirit and faith in the truth. ”

(2 Thessalonians 2:13)

“They said, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you

and your household.” ” (Acts 16:31)

Page 10: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

If it‟s God, then He determined who He would save.

If it‟s us, then God determined that it would be us, using our free will choice.

Either way, God is in sovereign control over our salvation.www.confidentchristians.org

Page 11: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

Let‟s look at a brief history of the sovereignty, free will, and salvation

debate.www.confidentchristians.org

Page 12: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

“Grant what thou commandest, and

command what thou dost desire.” - Augustine

Page 13: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

Pelagius vs. Augustine

Pelagius (c.354-after 418) was a British monk who emerged as a spiritual leader of both clergy and laity in Rome around A.D.

380. He bristled greatly at Augustine‟s statement and

took issue with his views on the inherited sinfulness of man from

Adam and the moral inability that Augustine believed

Scripture taught.

Page 14: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

Pelagius vs. Augustine

Pelagius‟ teachings can be summarized in three basic positions:

1. There is no connection between Adam‟s sin and the state all people are born into. People are born innocent without sin

2. People have the free will to choose good or evil

3. There is a grace of God active in the world, but it is only an „illuminating grace‟ that influences people, but it can be resisted

Page 15: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

Pelagius vs. Augustine

Augustine opposed Pelagius and argued that Scripture clearly teaches

every human is born in sin and their conscience is marred so that they, by nature rebel against God. In short,

Augustine‟s position was that people do not save themselves, because they

cannot, nor are they saved against their will, because they will not. God needs to

make their will compliant: “Neither the grace of God alone, nor he alone, but

the grace of God with him…”

At the council of Carthage in A.D. 412, Augustine won and had Pelagius‟

views officially condemned.

Page 16: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

Thomas Aquinas Follows Augustine

Thomas Aquinas followed Augustine where the free will of

humanity is concerned and stated that all people are absolute debtors to God and cannot merit salvation

on their own or by their choice.

“It is impossible that any creature should cause grace.”

“Hence, however much a man prepares himself, he does not

necessarily receive grace from God.”

Page 17: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

On All Saints Day in 1517, Martin Luther nailed his 95 thesis to the door of the Castle Church in Wittenburg Germany in hopes of stirring an

academic discussion with church leaders. Most historians will say that the core issue was Luther‟s position of salvation by faith alone. But also at

issue was something more.

www.confidentchristians.org

Page 18: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

SoliSolus

SolaSolaSola

To the Glory of God Alone

Christ Alone

Scripture Alone

Faith Alone

Grace Alone

The Five „Solas‟ of the

Reformation

www.confidentchristians.org

Page 19: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

"It is wrong to suppose that the doctrine of justification by faith alone, that storm center

of the Reformation, was the crucial question in the minds of such theologians as Martin

Luther, Ulrich Zwingli, Martin Bucer, and John Calvin. This doctrine was important to the Reformers because it helped to express

and to safeguard their answer to another, more vital, question, namely, whether sinners are wholly helpless in their sin, and whether God is to be thought of as saving them by

free, unconditional, invincible grace, not only justifying them for Christs' sake when they come to faith, but also raising them from the

death of sin by His quickening Spirit in order to bring them to faith."

-Michael HaykinProfessor of Church History

Page 20: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

Martin Luther called his book “The Bondage of

the Will” his most important work. In it he

argues that humanity is in bondage to sin, freely

choosing to sin by their own will, yet still a slave to sin and unable to choose

God on their own.

Martin Luther on Free Will

Page 21: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

“I praise and command you highly for this also, that unlike all the rest

you alone have attacked the real issue, the

essence of the matter in dispute.”

Martin Luther to ErasmusResponse to Diatribe of the

Freedom of the Will

Page 22: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

“Free will without God‟s grace is not free at all, but is the permanent prisoner

and bondslave of evil, since it cannot turn itself

to good.”- Martin Luther

Martin Luther on Free Will

Page 23: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

Like Luther, the Genevan Reformer embraced the notion of original sin in humanity and the inability of a sinful person

to freely choose God.

“When the will is enchanted as the slave of sin, it cannot make a movement towards goodness,

far less steadily pursue it.”

John Calvin on Free Will

Page 24: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

Calvin (with Luther) affirmed humanity does have free will in that people can and do act voluntarily,

without compulsion. Men and women make choices every day that are

carried through freely via their will. But concerning the things of God,

Calvin says humanity is “blinder than moles.”

How they can a person freely choose God according to Calvin?

John Calvin on Free Will

Page 25: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

“God, therefore, begins the good work in us by exciting in our hearts a desire, a

love, and a study of righteousness, or (to speak more correctly) by turning, training, and guiding our hearts unto

righteousness. . . . I say the will is abolished, but not in so far as it is [a]

will, for in conversion everything essential to our original nature remains”

I also say, that it is created anew, not because the will then begins to exist, but because it is turned from evil to

good.”- John Calvin

John Calvin on Free Will

Page 26: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

“Historically, it is a simple matter of fact that Martin Luther and

John Calvin . . . and all the leading Protestant theologians

of the first epoch of the Reformation, stood on precisely the same ground here. On other points they had their differences; but in asserting the helplessness

of man and the sovereignty of God in grace, the were entirely

at one." - J. I. Packer

Page 27: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

At the Council of Trent (1545-1563) , the Catholic Church met to consider the Reformation, with the

goal being to defend their beliefs and distance themselves from the

reformers.

The Council affirmed the doctrine of original Adamic sin; humanity is born into the world separated from

God. Thus, infants born need cleansing from Adam‟s sin and so need to be baptized to wash away

Adam‟s disobedience.

The Catholic Church Responds

www.confidentchristians.org

Page 28: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

Baptism, said the Council, removes the guilt of Adam from every child and

leaves them in a state of innocence with a free will that may or may not choose to

sin. The position is clear: “If any one denies, that, by the grace of our Lord

Jesus Christ, which is conferred in baptism, the guilt of original sin is

remitted; or even asserts that the whole of that which has the true and proper nature of sin is not taken away . . . Let

him be anathema.”

In essence, they are returned to a state enunciated by Pelagius.

The Catholic Church Responds

www.confidentchristians.org

Page 29: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

The Catholic Church & Molinism

To counter the intellectual and Biblical arguments of the reformers regarding

God‟s sovereignty and humanity‟s free will, the Catholic Church responded

with the Jesuit Luis de Molina.

According to Molina, God has three kinds of knowledge:

1. Natural – Knowledge of everything that could be

2. Free - Knowledge of everything that will be

3. Middle - Knowledge of everything that would be

Page 30: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

The Catholic Church & Molinism

It is Middle Knowledge – scientiamedia – that distinguishes Molinism. This concept says God does not know future free acts of individuals

like He does other things; He knows them contingently. He has intuited what each, according to their innate

liberty, would do if placed in a certain situation. God, in essence, waits to

see what a free creature does before He selects those who will be saved.

But since God is eternal, the sequence is only logical and not

chronological.

Page 31: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

Jacob Arminius (1560-1609), one of the reformers, moved away from

Calvin‟s and Luther‟s teachings where sovereignty and free will are concerned. Arminius said the relationship between

God and humanity is one of cooperative assistance. The Holy

Spirit is not overcoming a hostile will to make it compliant so much as it is

assisting and increasing a person‟s natural faculties to respond to God.

The Holy Spirit only succeeds so far as a person concurs. People can

prevent the grace of God by resisting it.

The Rise of Arminius

www.confidentchristians.org

Page 32: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

The Synod of Dort was held in 1618-1619 to debate the teachings of Arminius and the reformers. There were key issues

at the center of the debate:

• A person‟s ability to choose God• God‟s election based on foreknowledge

or His divine choice• Whether Christ died for all• Whether a person can resist grace• If a person could lose their salvation

The end result was that Arminianism was rejected and reformed teachings was

upheld.

Arminianism vs. Reformed Teachings

www.confidentchristians.org

Page 33: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

T – Total Depravity

U – Unconditional Election

L – Limited Atonement

I – Irresistible Grace

P – Perseverance of the Saints

www.confidentchristians.org

Page 34: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

Pelagianism Arminianism(Semi-Pelagianism)

Calvinism(Reformed Theology)

State at birth Innocent Totally depraved(conscience corrupted)

Totally depraved(conscience effaced)

Ability Can obey God Cooperate with God Cannot cooperate with God

Guilt None Potential Judicial/actual

“In Adam” Not at all Potentially Legally/naturally

Inherited from Adam

Bad example Propensity to sin;necessity to die

Necessity to sin; necessity to die

What is imputed One‟s own sin One‟s own sin One‟s own sin and Adam‟s sin

Spiritual image of God

Retained Effaced Effaced

Effect of grace None Sufficient for all Efficient on those God chooses

Overview of the Positions on Sin/Free Will

Page 35: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

John Wesley – a Calvin/Arminian Mix

John Wesley (1703-1791) adopted a position that was a middle ground between Reformed and Arminian

teaching. He affirmed humanity was totally depraved and could not

cooperate with God. However, he said that because of Christ‟s work on the

cross, God‟s grace comes upon all people – a grace termed preventing or „prevenient‟ grace – and that people at

that point are capable of freely cooperating with God where their

salvation is concerned.

“Without it (prevenient grace), the Calvinist logic is irrefutable.”

– Robert E. Chiles

Page 36: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

Calvinism Arminianism Wesleyanism

Total Depravity Unable to respond to God without grace

Able to respond to God with help from God

Unable to respond to God without Prevenient grace

UnconditionalElection

Elected to Salvation by God alone

God‟s call goes out to all; humanityfreely believes and is saved

God‟s call goes out to all and must be freely accepted by a person via a restored will

LimitedAtonement

Christ died only for the Elect

Christ died for everyone

Christ died for everyone

IrresistibleGrace

God‟s call effectual; it cannot fail; a person will freely come to God when called

Can resist God‟s call

Can resist God‟s call

Perseverance of the Saints

Cannot lose salvation

Can lose salvation Can lose salvation

Positions on Sovereignty and Free Will

Page 37: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

www.confidentchristians.org

Open Theism – A Heresy to Avoid

Open Theism is a theological position dealing with human free will and God‟s sovereignty. It is the teaching that God has granted to humanity free will and that in order for the free will to

be truly free, the future free will choices of individuals cannot be known ahead of time by God. In Open Theism, the future is either knowable or not knowable. Some open theists say God knows the future, but voluntarily limits His knowledge of free will choices so that

they can remain truly free. Other open theists maintain that the future, being non existent, is not knowable, even by God. Gregory Boyd, an advocate of Open Theism says, "Much of

it [the future], open theists will concede, is settled ahead of time, either by God's predestining will or by existing earthly causes, but it is not exhaustively settled ahead of time.

To whatever degree the future is yet open to be decided by free agents, it is unsettled."

Page 38: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

Concluding Thoughts and Questions…

Page 39: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

It‟s not fair…!

Sovereignty is just fatalism…!

Why evangelize…?

Does God choose some people for hell…?

Am I truly free…?

Can I lose my salvation…?

Can God fail…?

Page 40: God's Sovereignty, Free Will, and Salvation - Introduction

Sovereignty

Free Will &

Salvation