GNR_630_Spring2012_3-GPS_MajorSignalDealyModelling.pdf
-
Upload
srinivasgeo -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of GNR_630_Spring2012_3-GPS_MajorSignalDealyModelling.pdf
-
4/3/2012
1
1
GPS: Errors in Pseudorange Measurements and Their Modelling
30/03/2012
Announcements:Quiz on 13th April (Friday)Final Exam : 50 marks / 10 questions1-DIP, 4 GIS, 5 GPS
2
Uses measurements from 4+ satellitesdistance = travel time x speed of light
-
4/3/2012
2
Sources Of Errors in GPS Data
Ephemeris DataErrors in the Transmitted Location of the satellite
Satellite ClockErrors in transmitted Clock signal
IonosphereErrors in Pseudorange caused by Ionospheric effect
TroposphereErrors in Pseudorange caused by Tropospheric effect
MultipathErrors due to reflected signal sensed by the receiver Antena
ReceiverErrors due to Thermal Noise, Inter-channel biases and Software accuracy
-
4/3/2012
3
Troposphere Begins from Surface of Earth and Ends where the Temperature in the Atmosphere Stops decreasing (10 Km altitude)
IONOSPHERE
Ionosphere has a significant influence on advanced communication and navigation systems like GPS
-
4/3/2012
4
Atmospheric Layers
Passage of GPS Signal Through Atmosphere
Space to Ground and Space to Space GPS path delay measurement setup
-
4/3/2012
5
Generalised Atmospheric Circulation Model
AttenuationScintillation 0.5 dbDelay (2 - 25 M)
EFFECT OF TROPOSHERE
75% of Total, rest 25% comes from Tropopause region
Also varies with Elevation Angle and Gas density profile with altitude
-
4/3/2012
6
The variation of pressure with altitude
-
4/3/2012
7
=
v
cn=
The refractive index of a medium, n, is defined as the ratio of the speed of propagation of an electromagnetic wave in a vacuum, c, to the speed of propagation in this medium, v:
Usually instead of the refractive index n, the refractivity N is used as the electromagnetic waves in the atmosphere propagate just slightly slower than in a vacuum and it is given by
)1(106 = nN Trop
Hopfield (1969) shows the possibility of separating N into a dry and a wet component
-
4/3/2012
8
The dry refractivity is directly proportional to atmospheric pressure and can be accurately modeled. The hydrostatic refractivity can be expressed as
where ,
P is the hydrostatic air pressure in mb and T is temperature in Kelvins
In the presence of water vapor and hydrometeors, refractivity can be modeled with the aid of additional measurements. The wet refractivity of water vapor can be expressed as (Smith et al., 1953).
where k = 64.8 Kmb-1 , k = 3.776x105 K2 mb-1 ,Pv is the partial pressure of water vapor (e) in mb and T in Kelvins. So, Tropospheric refractivity (N Trop ) will be
Actually the values of k , k & k are empirically determined and dependent of local situations
-
4/3/2012
9
Tropospheric Delay
Since the tropospheric refractive index is higher than unity varying as a function of altitude, a wave propagating between the ground and a satellite has a radio path length exceeding the geometrical path length. The difference in length can be obtained by the following integral:
OR
Where N Trop is the tropospheric refractivity.
Delay Structure of Radio Waves
-
4/3/2012
10
The tropospheric delay can be separated into two main components: Hydrostatic delay Wet delay.
Hydrostatic delay is caused by the dry part of the atmospheric constituents and can be estimated precisely using surface temperature and pressure measurements. By removing the hydrostatic delay from the total tropospheric delay, the remaining signal delay is called the wet delay, About 90% of the tropospheric refraction arises from the dry and about 10% from the wet component (Hofmann, 2001).
The slant tropospheric delays at arbitrary elevation angles can be expressed in terms of the zenith delays and mapping functions. This representation allows the use of separate mapping functions for the hydrostatic and wet delay components:
is elevation Angle of satellite
-
4/3/2012
11
-
4/3/2012
12
-
4/3/2012
13
-
4/3/2012
14
-
4/3/2012
15
Principle
Total Delay = Ionosphere Delay + Neutral Delay
Neutral Delay = Total Delay - Ionosphere Delay
Zenith Neutral Delay = Zenith Hydrostatic Delay + Zenith Wet Delay
Zenith Wet Delay = Zenith Neutral Delay - Zenith Hydrostatic Delay
Ground Based Method
-
4/3/2012
16
-
4/3/2012
17
-
4/3/2012
18
-
4/3/2012
19
-
4/3/2012
20
GPS signals are slowed and refracted as they passthrough the Earths atmosphere.
Measurement of the bending angle produced byatmospheric refraction provides the observable that isthe basis of space-based GPS meteorology.
Resolving the delay of GPS signals caused by the atmosphere using the most accurate geodetic receivers provides the observable that is the basis for ground-based GPS meteorology.
Noise for Some is the Signal to Others
-
4/3/2012
21
GPS Meteorology(Estimation of PRECIPITABLE WATER Vapor in Atmosphere from the observed delay from to troposphere
-
4/3/2012
22
Modelling of IONOSPHERIC Delay
-
4/3/2012
23
Atmospheric Layers
Ionospheric:10 100 m delay in Pseudo range
Tropospheric:
2.3 to 30 m depending on elevation and atmospheric conditions
Clock Sensitivity:
Typically GPS satellite orbital velocity is 1 Km/Sec, thus it moves by 66 meters in the position by the time the GPS signal reaches earth surface (20000Km away) in 66 msec.
An error of 1 msec would result in pseudorange error of 300 Km
For Phase processing ( 1 microSec) data is needed so that 300 m errors in pseudorange is tolerated by the solution.
Normal Ranges for Pseudorange Errors
In conventional applications these are modelled as functions of atmospheric parameters such as TEC in Ionosphere, Temperature, Pressure and Humidity of the atmosphere etc.
-
4/3/2012
24
IONOSPHERE
Ionosphere has a significant influence on advanced communication and navigation systems like GPS
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Geographic Longitude ( oE)
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Geographic Latitude (oN)
TEC in TECU
37+
34 to 37
31 to 34
27 to 31
24 to 27
21 to 24
18 to 21
15 to 18
12 to 15
9 to 12
6 to 9
2 to 6
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
(e)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Geographic Longitude ( oE)
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Geographic Latitude (oN)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
(a)0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Geographic Longitude ( oE)
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Geographic Latitude (oN)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
(b)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Geographic Longitude ( oE)
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Geographic Latitude (oN)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
(c)0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Geographic Longitude ( oE)
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Geographic Latitude (oN)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
(d)
LT: 9:30 AM LT: 11:30 AM
LT: 1:30 PM LT: 3:30 PM
LT: 5:30 PM
SPACE WEATHER
-
4/3/2012
25
IONOSPHERIC ERRORS: 1) TIME DELAYS
Radio signals are bent and therefore delayed by the F layer and absorbed by the D-layer
1 TECU = 10+16 e-/m2
1 ns = 0.3 m = 2.852 TECU40 TECU = 4.2 m200 TECU = 570.04 ns = 171.01 m
Receiver
400 km
Center of Earth
Sub-Ionospheric Point
x
Ionosphere
Plasmasphere
9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5
Universal Time (Hr)
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
dTEC/min (TECU/min)Radio signals experience
scintillations due to electron density irregularities
2) SCINTILLATIONS
Plasma bubble
9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5
Universal Time (Hr)
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Vertical TEC (TECU)
equatorial
plasma bubble
11.5 UT
21.5 LT
TEC fluctuations
GPS phase scintillation
-
4/3/2012
26
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25
Universal Time (Hr)
150
200
250
300
350
400
h'F (km)
11 UT, 21 LT
352 km
225 km
HEIGHT VARIATIONS
Radio signals experience scintillations due to
ionospheric height variations
IONOSPHERIC MODELLING Based on TEC count
The TEC is expressed in units of electrons/m2 or occasionally TEC units (TECU)
1 TECU is defined as 1016 electrons/m2. The TEC is a function of time of day, user location, satellite
elevation angle, season, ionizing flux, magnetic activity, sunspot cycle, and scintillation.
Nominally ranges between 1016 and 1019, with the twoextremes occurring around midnight and mid-afternoon
-
4/3/2012
27
where = (fL1/fL2)2. Here ionospheric delay errors are removed, Drawback : measurement errors are significantly magnified through thecombination.
-
4/3/2012
28
A preferred approach is to use the L1 and L2 pseudorangemeasurements to estimate the ionospheric error on L1 using the following expression:
? Single frequency Receivers
In case of a single-frequency receivers, models such as the Klobuchar
model based on observed ionospheric variatios with Latitude and local
time of the Day is used
Removes (on average) about 50% of the ionospheric delay at midlatitudes
through a set of coefficients included in the GPS navigation message.
Assumption is that the vertical ionospheric delay can be approximated by
half a cosine function of the local time during daytime and by a constant
level during nigh time
-
4/3/2012
29
END
Almost three times as much delay is incurred when viewing satellites at low elevationthan at the zenith. For a signal arriving at vertical incidence, the delay rangesfrom about 10 ns (3m) at night to as much as 50 ns (15m) during the day. At low satelliteviewing angles (0 through 10), the delay can range from 30 ns (9m) at nightup to 150 ns (45m) during the day [15]. A typical 1-sigma value for residual ionosphericdelays, averaged over the globe and over elevation angles, is 7m [17].
Almost three times as much delay is incurred when viewing satellites at low elevation than at the zenith. For a signal arriving at vertical incidence, the delay rangesfrom about 10 ns (3m) at night to as much as 50 ns (15m) during the day. At low satellite viewing angles (0 through 10), the delay can range from 30 ns (9m) at night up to 150 ns (45m) during the day A typical 1-sigma value for residual ionosphericdelays, averaged over the globe and over elevation angles, is 7m
-
4/3/2012
30
-
4/3/2012
31
-
4/3/2012
32
-
4/3/2012
33