Global income changes: effects on export opportunities for developing countries Jörg Mayer Division...
-
Upload
francis-oconnor -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Global income changes: effects on export opportunities for developing countries Jörg Mayer Division...
Global income changes: effects on export
opportunities for developing countries
Jörg MayerDivision on Globalisation and Development Strategies
UNCTAD
UNCTAD Training Course onKey Issues on the International Economic Agenda
Global income and trade trends: Implications for export opportunities for developing
countries
Geneva, 7 March 2013
Main points – diagnosis• What happened? Onset of current crisis led
to global trade collapse with ensuing loss of dynamism in consumer goods imports by the US
• Why is this important?– US-consumption was a key driver of global growth
in pre-crisis period
– The growth slowdown in advanced economies is unlikely to be a temporary phenomenon
– Crisis transmission through trade channel affects products whose exports to developed countries boosted developing country growth prior to the crisis and that have historically supported productive transformation
Main points – response
• What to do? Develop domestic and South-South markets to compensate for loss of export potential to advanced economies
• Is demand in developing countries large enough to compensate for lower demand growth in developed countries? In some sectors, demand in the large emerging economies is likely to exceed that in developed countries within the coming 10–15 years
• Policy implications? Pursue macroeconomic, trade and industrial policies that allow creating employment and purchasing power – to support demand – and expanding productive capacity – to benefit from arising market opportunities
Overview
1. The great trade collapse – evidence for selected product categories
3. Potential growth of consumer demand in developing countries
4. Policy considerations
5. Conclusions
1. The global trade collapse in 2008–2009
• The sharp, sudden and synchronized fall in trade in 2008–09 is striking because real world trade fell by about 15%, exceeding the fall of real world GDP roughly by a factor of 4
• Changes in real final expenditure bear main responsibility
• Reasons for large size of impact: high import content of exports (GVCs) and high import content of household consumption in developed countries, especially the US
• The widely expected slow recovery towards a weak growth path in advanced economies is reducing the opportunities to export to these countries beyond the short term, during which developing countries might compensate resulting potential growth shortfalls by countercyclical macroeconomic policies
The impact of the global trade collapse varied considerably across individual economies,
depending on their pattern of export specialization
The price and volume effects of the global trade collapse in 2008–09, selected developing economies, trade shock as a percent of GDP
Economies with more than 40 per cent of exports in the manufacturing sector
-35 -25 -15 -5 5
Singapore
Hong Kong SAR of China
Malaysia
Viet Nam
Taiwan Province of China
Cambodia
Thailand
Mexico
China
Tunisia
Demand effect ToT effect
Economies with more than 40 per centof exports in the energy sector
-35 -25 -15 -5 5
Brunei Darussalam
Bahrain
Iraq
Gabon
Saudi Arabia
Trinidad and Tobago
Kuwait
Oman
Qatar
Algeria
Demand effect ToT effect
US-imports of consumer goods lost pre-crisis dynamism
Consumer goods imports, United States, 1999 I – 2012 III, $bn
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
99-I
00-I
01-I
02-I
03-I
04-I
05-I
06-I
07-I
08-I
09-I
10-I
11-I
12-I
Automotive vehicles, parts, and engines
Consumer goods (nonfood), except automotive
Linear (trend 1999 I – 2008 II): automotive vehicles, parts, and engines)
Linear (trend 1999 I – 2008 II): consumer goods (nonfood), except automotive)
Loss of dynamism especially for durable consumer goods (excl automobiles), where
developing countries have a large market shareConsumer goods imports, United States, selected categories and source countries,
1999–2011, $bn
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Durable total (left) Durable China (left) Durable Mexico (left) Non-durable total (left)
Non-durable China (left) Semi-durable total (right) Semi-durable China (right)
2. Potential growth of consumer demand in developing countries
• The potential growth of consumer demand in developing countries depends on five variables:
– Income elasticity of demand– Export orientation– Income distribution– Per-capita income growth– Demographic developments
• Simulations indicate that, in some sectors, demand in large emerging economies will exceed that in developed countries within the coming 10–15 years
Demand for consumer goods goes through periods of acceleration and deceleration – rapidly growing
developing countries are in acceleration phaseRelationship between per capita income and income elasticity of demand, selected consumer
good categories
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000
Per capita income (constant 2005 international dollars)
Inc
om
e el
asti
city
(cr
oss
-co
un
try
aver
ag
es;
77
cou
ntr
ies;
19
90–2
011)
Durables Semi-durables Food and non-alcoholic beverages
Services United States China
Brazil India Indonesia
Germany Japan
India Indon-esia
China
Brazil
JapanGermany
United States
Country-specific positions and movements relative to the cross-country benchmark are related to the
importance of consumption and exports in aggregate demandRelationship between per capita income and expenditure on durable consumer goods, selected
economies, ‘90–‘11
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000
Per capita income (ourchasing power in 2005 prices)
Ex
pe
nd
itu
re o
n d
ura
ble
co
ns
um
er
go
od
s,
co
ns
tan
t U
S d
oll
ars
in
20
11
pri
ce
s
United States
Germany
Japan
Indo-nesia
Brazil
Chile
China
Taiwan Province of China
Rep of Korea
Czech Republic
Income distribution affects the number of people that belong to the
middle classPer capita income and different income classes, selected countries, 2005
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Country decile
Lo
g o
f p
er c
apit
a in
com
e (p
urc
has
ing
po
we
r p
arit
y in
20
05
pri
ces)
India
China
Brazil
United States
Russian Fed
Nigeria
Indonesia
Per-capita expenditure on durable consumer goods in some developing and transition economies may overtake that in the United States within a decade
or twoProjections based on assumed growth rates, 2011–2050
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 2033 2035 2037 2039 2041 2043 2045 2047 2049
Per capita income (purchasing power parity in 2005 prices)
Co
ns
tan
t d
ollars
in
20
11 p
ric
es
India China US Brazil Russian Federation
3. Policy considerations• Demand potential in developing
countries provides sizeable opportunities for development of productive capacity and boost productive transformation, driven by fixed investment
• Wage and employment policies must ensure sufficient growth of domestic purchasing power to create middle class
• Macroeconomic, trade and industrial policies must ensure that domestic firms meet emerging demand
Why developing country enterprises may be well placed to meet newly
arising demand• MNEs used “their existing high-end products and
services through standard distribution channels to target the most affluent tier of customers in the largest cities” (Boston Consulting Group)
• Due to differences in consumer tastes etc., proximity to markets is important when targeting less affluent consumers – path of innovation
• Developing country firms can develop less material- and energy-intensive consumer goods, which may not match existing technologies or appeal to Western consumers, and preserve their environment – green industrial policies
4. Conclusions• Policies in developed economies should strive for
sustained rapid growth and refrain from protectionism
• Yet, the two-speed world economy makes export-led growth strategies less viable in developing countries
• Greater importance of domestic consumption in developing countries lowers the per capita income of the median global consumer with attendant changes in the composition of demand
• Developing country enterprises may be well placed to meet newly arising demand
• Not all developing countries can easily change their production structure to match the emerging domestic demand structure – international trade remains important