Global Deck: 2011 Capital Staffers Index
-
Upload
edelman-insights -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
7.118 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Global Deck: 2011 Capital Staffers Index
2011 Capital Staffers IndexA Global Analysis of Digital Media’s Impact on Shaping PolicyNovember 2011
Research methodology and objectives
2
This survey tests the perceived value of various communication strategies as tools for policymakers to connect with local residents and communities; determines the credibility and trust associated with social media networks; and compares the Internet’s influence on policymakers internationally.
Washington, DC Congress 50
Ottawa, CA Parliament 25
Mexico City, MX Congress 50
Buenos Aires, AR Congress 50
Brasilia, BR Congress 50
London, UK Parliament 91
Brussels. BE Parliament 51
Paris, FR Assembly 50
Berlin, DE Bundestag 50
New Delhi, IN Parliament 55
Beijing, CN Congress 20
The overall margin of error is +4.2% in 95
out of 100 cases.
StrategyOne surveyed 542 senior staff members from key capitals around the world from September 26 to October 31, 2011.
From Policy Issue to Policy Priority
“It’s the Economy Stupid” & “All Politics is Local”
3
How important are each of the following in turning a policy issue into a policy priority for you?
95% 95%86% 84% 77%
Outside research and briefing overviews play an
important role when staffers meet with lobbyists
4
When you meet with lobbyists, which THREE of the following things do you pay the most attention to?
academicwhitepapers
NGOResearch
one pagebriefings
editorials industrygroups
polls ads blogs
Making Life EasierEvidence-based analysis is important
5
Present clear analysis with evidence 23%
Be focused on message 20%
Know the issue 11%
Don’t be overwhelming/fewer e-mails 7%
Better communication 6%
Use more technology 4%
Better cooperation 4%
Personal contact 3%
Local support 2%
Schedule meetings in advance 1%
What is the ONE thing that advocacy groups or lobbyists could do that would do the MOST to make YOUR job easier?(Open ended)
Top Two Factors
Fact Supported Messaging
Top Two Factors
Fact Supported Messaging
Which ONE of these is typically the reason why a public affairs campaign fails?
Campaign “Fail Factors”
6
Poor mes-sage
23%
Poorly de-signed
strategy
14%
Limited support
12%
Poor spokesman
11%
Narrow corporate in-terests
11%
Small & narrow coalition
8% Weak media relations
8%Poorly exe-
cuted adver-tising
7%No studies
that support goals
4%Weak team
2%
Advocacy is Personal
7
When hearing from local advocacy groups, which of the following things help that group ’s cause, and which of the following hurt that group’s cause?
constituentoffice visits
communityleader letters emailsvoter
letterslocal
editorialssocialmedia
onlinepetitions
Effectiveness of reaching members through social networks and Twitter is growing,
rapidly approaching more traditional modes that maintain their lead
8
Traditional Channel Digital Communication Paid Media
*2010 for Through a member’s website and Mobile interaction through applications or text messagesWhen constituents contact your member, how effective are each of the following modes of contact?
Reaching Members% Total Effective
2009 2010 2011Change from 2009*
In-person visits with constituents N/A N/A 94% --Constituent-sent e-mails 87% 92% 85% -2Telephone calls 85% 83% 83% -2Written letters 90% 88% 81% -9Through a member’s website N/A 72% 79% +7Newspaper columns N/A N/A 72% --In-person visits with a professional lobbyist N/A N/A 70% --Television appearances N/A N/A 70% --Through a trade association N/A N/A 64% --Press releases N/A N/A 62% --Radio appearances N/A N/A 62% --Through a member’s Facebook, Orkut or other social network profile 22% 37% 54% +32Op-eds N/A N/A 54% --Television advertising N/A N/A 47% --Print advertising N/A N/A 45% --Mobile interaction through applications or text messages N/A 32% 44% +12Through Twitter 7% 15% 41% +34Radio advertising N/A N/A 40% --Comments posted on YouTube N/A 14% 30% --
The internet is a driver in informing and shaping
policy issues
9In the last 30 days, have you:
81%in 2009
67%NO
Changed your position on a policy issue, based on something you read online (globally)
Energized
33%YES
Learned about a public policy issue for the first time online (globally)
Educated
60%YES
54%in 2009 40%
NO 19%in 2009
46%in 2009
Globally, the effectiveness of Twitter and social networks are experiencing
the most significant growth
10When constituents contact your member, how effective are each of the following modes of contact?
Current Member use of Facebook and Twitter is already outpacing
last year’s forecast for three-year growth
11
Thinking about several different technologies, please indicate whether or not your Member was using them to communicate with constituents on key issues 3 years ago, is using them now, and will be using them 3 years from now.
+8+8
Twitter’s ability to provide news and politics is a large
factor motivating who staffers choose to follow
12If you use Twitter, please select each of the types of people YOU follow on Twitter?
The focus on members of the
media highlights a
need for focus on direct media
relations
The focus on members of the
media highlights a
need for focus on direct media
relations
A majority of staffers use Twitter as an issues and news first alert
system
13
Thinking just about Twitter, which ONE of the following do you feel is the biggest benefit you get from using Twitter?
There is a clear desire to influence the
flow of information: using Twitter
to receive news quickly
and call attention to
issues bypasses traditional
news sources and allows
staffers to act as a source of information
themselves.
There is a clear desire to influence the
flow of information: using Twitter
to receive news quickly
and call attention to
issues bypasses traditional
news sources and allows
staffers to act as a source of information
themselves.
Twitter Use by Country(60% Overall)
Designing the Perfect Campaign
14
Tell a Compelling Story
Master NarrativeStatistics
AnecdotesConcise, impactful supporting content
Take the issue onlineSearch optimizationCompelling content
Tweets & blogs
Personalize Your OutreachGrassroots/Advocacy
Constituent letters/e-mailsMember outreach days
Business/Community leader testimonials
Supplement Traditional with DigitalGovernment relations
Media relationsTwitter/Facebook
Social media/blogs/websites
Make it relevantNational Economics/Local Impact
Analysis and research White Papers
15
2011 Capital Staffers IndexA Global Analysis of Digital Media’s Impact on Shaping PolicyNovember 2011
16
AppendixNational Score CardsNovember 2011
Summary of United States%
Tot
al E
ffecti
veM
embe
rs’ D
igita
l U
sage
Effectiveness of Inbound Digital Communication 2009 2011 Change
Constituent-sent e-mails 84% 78% -6
Through a member’s website n/a 74% - -
Through Twitter 16% 40% +24
Through a member’s Facebook, Orkut or other social network profile 40% 38% -2
Comments posted on YouTube n/a 30% - -
Mobile interaction through applications or text messages n/a 26% - -
Top Twitter
Members of the media 48%
Political professionals 48%
Bloggers 40%
Legislative Colleagues 38%
Federal Government Entities 38%
Local Interest Groups 33%
Constituents 31%
Community Organizations 26%
% F
ollo
w o
n Tw
itter
Top
3 Tw
itter
Ben
efits
Summary of United Kingdom%
Tot
al E
ffecti
veM
embe
rs’ D
igita
l U
sage
Effectiveness of Inbound Digital Communication 2009 2011 Change
Constituent-sent e-mails 94% 97% +3
Through a member’s website n/a 89% - -
Through a member’s Facebook, Orkut or other social network profile 15% 41% +26
Through Twitter 9% 34% +25
Mobile interaction through applications or text messages n/a 23% - -
Comments posted on YouTube n/a 12% - -
Top Twitter
Members of the media 83%
Political professionals 75%
Bloggers 73%
Local Interest Groups 60%
Federal Government Entities 53%
Community Organizations 53%
Legislative Colleagues 47%
Constituents 28%
% F
ollo
w o
n Tw
itter
Top
3 Tw
itter
Ben
efits
Summary of Brussels (European Union)%
Tot
al E
ffecti
veM
embe
rs’ D
igita
l U
sage
Effectiveness of Inbound Digital Communication 2009 2011 Change
Constituent-sent e-mails 82% 84% +2
Through a member’s website n/a 76% - -
Through a member’s Facebook, Orkut or other social network profile 22% 61% +39
Mobile interaction through applications or text messages n/a 37% - -
Through Twitter 7% 22% +15
Comments posted on YouTube n/a 12% - -
Top Twitter
Members of the media 71%
Political professionals 71%
Bloggers 54%
Community Organizations 46%
Legislative Colleagues 42%
Local Interest Groups 38%
Federal Government Entities 29%
Constituents 25%
% F
ollo
w o
n Tw
itter
Top
3 Tw
itter
Ben
efits
Summary of France%
Tot
al E
ffecti
veM
embe
rs’ D
igita
l U
sage
Effectiveness of Inbound Digital Communication 2009 2011 Change
Through a member’s website n/a 72% - -
Constituent-sent e-mails 88% 70% -18
Mobile interaction through applications or text messages n/a 54% - -
Through a member’s Facebook, Orkut or other social network profile 3% 36% +33
Comments posted on YouTube n/a 24% - -
Through Twitter 0% 16% +16%
Top Twitter
Legislative Colleagues 100%
Members of the media 81%
Political professionals 75%
Federal Government Entities 63%
Bloggers 56%
Community Organizations 38%
Local Interest Groups 31%
Constituents 31%
% F
ollo
w o
n Tw
itter
Top
3 Tw
itter
Ben
efits
Summary of Germany%
Tot
al E
ffecti
veM
embe
rs’ D
igita
l U
sage
Effectiveness of Inbound Digital Communication 2009 2011 Change
Constituent-sent e-mails 88% 94% +6
Through a member’s website n/a 90% - -
Through a member’s Facebook, Orkut or other social network profile 32% 40% +8
Mobile interaction through applications or text messages n/a 24% - -
Through Twitter 4% 12% +8
Comments posted on YouTube n/a 8% - -
Top Twitter
Constituents 67%
Legislative Colleagues 60%
Members of the media 53%
Political professionals 53%
Local Interest Groups 40%
Federal Government Entities 27%
Bloggers 20%
Community Organizations 13%
% F
ollo
w o
n Tw
itter
Top
3 Tw
itter
Ben
efits
Summary of India%
Tot
al E
ffecti
veM
embe
rs’ D
igita
l U
sage
Top Twitter
Local Interest Groups 35%
Members of the media 31%
Federal Government Entities 27%
Bloggers 23%
Community Organizations 23%
Political professionals 23%
Constituents 19%
Legislative Colleagues 19%
% F
ollo
w o
n Tw
itter
Top
3 Tw
itter
Ben
efits
Effectiveness of Inbound Digital Communication 2011
Constituent-sent e-mails 89%
Mobile interaction through applications or text messages 78%
Through a member’s website 69%
Through a member’s Facebook, Orkut or other social network profile 51%
Through Twitter 40%
Comments posted on YouTube 36%
Summary of Argentina%
Tot
al E
ffecti
veM
embe
rs’ D
igita
l U
sage
Top Twitter
Constituents 21%
Political professionals 18%
Legislative Colleagues 15%
Community Organizations 15%
Members of the media 12%
Local Interest Groups 9%
Federal Government Entities 6%
Bloggers 0%
% F
ollo
w o
n Tw
itter
Top
3 Tw
itter
Ben
efits
Effectiveness of Inbound Digital Communication 2011
Constituent-sent e-mails 74%
Through a member’s Facebook, Orkut or other social network profile 72%
Through a member’s website 70%
Through Twitter 62%
Mobile interaction through applications or text messages 58%
Comments posted on YouTube 54%
Summary of Brazil%
Tot
al E
ffecti
veM
embe
rs’ D
igita
l U
sage
Top Twitter
Political professionals 72%
Legislative Colleagues 55%
Federal Government Entities 52%
Members of the media 48%
Local Interest Groups 41%
Constituents 38%
Bloggers 34%
Community Organizations 28%
% F
ollo
w o
n Tw
itter
Effectiveness of Inbound Digital Communication 2011
Constituent-sent e-mails 90%
Through a member’s website 82%
Through Twitter 68%
Through a member’s Facebook, Orkut or other social network profile 56%
Mobile interaction through applications or text messages 28%
Comments posted on YouTube 28%
Top
4 Tw
itter
Ben
efits
Summary of Mexico%
Tot
al E
ffecti
veM
embe
rs’ D
igita
l U
sage
Top Twitter
Members of the media 43%
Federal Government Entities 25%
Constituents 5%
Political professionals 5%
Community Organizations 5%
Local Interest Groups 2%
Legislative Colleagues 0%
Bloggers 0%
% F
ollo
w o
n Tw
itter
Effectiveness of Inbound Digital Communication 2011
Through a member’s Facebook, Orkut or other social network profile 96%
Constituent-sent e-mails 92%
Through a member’s website 92%
Through Twitter 82%
Mobile interaction through applications or text messages 80%
Comments posted on YouTube 70%
Top
3 Tw
itter
Ben
efits
Summary of China%
Tot
al E
ffecti
veM
embe
rs’ D
igita
l U
sage
Top Twitter
Federal Government Entities 38%
Local Interest Groups 31%
Constituents 15%
Bloggers 15%
Community Organizations 8%
Members of the media 8%
Legislative Colleagues 8%
Political professionals 0%
% F
ollo
w o
n Tw
itter
Effectiveness of Inbound Digital Communication 2011
Constituent-sent e-mails 50%
Through a member’s website 50%
Mobile interaction through applications or text messages 50%
Comments posted on YouTube 45%
Through a member’s Facebook, Orkut or other social network profile 35%
Through Twitter 30%
Top
3 Tw
itter
Ben
efits
Summary of Canada%
Tot
al E
ffecti
veM
embe
rs’ D
igita
l U
sage
Top Twitter
Members of the media 67%
Local Interest Groups 58%
Constituents 58%
Legislative Colleagues 58%
Community Organizations 54%
Political professionals 46%
Federal Government Entities 38%
Bloggers 29%
% F
ollo
w o
n Tw
itter
Effectiveness of Inbound Digital Communication 2011
Constituent-sent e-mails 96%
Through a member’s website 80%
Through a member’s Facebook, Orkut or other social network profile 76%
Through Twitter 56%
Mobile interaction through applications or text messages 40%
Comments posted on YouTube 28%
Top
3 Tw
itter
Ben
efits