Global Best Practices in Residential Electric Rate Design · Global Best Practices in Residential...

38
The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT 05602 Phone: 802-223-8199 web: www.raponline.org Global Best Practices in Residential Electric Rate Design Jim Lazar Senior Advisor May, 2013

Transcript of Global Best Practices in Residential Electric Rate Design · Global Best Practices in Residential...

The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT 05602

Phone: 802-223-8199 web: www.raponline.org

Global Best Practices in Residential Electric Rate Design

Jim Lazar Senior Advisor

May, 2013

2

Global Best Practices

• RAP has published three recent papers on rate design:

– Time-Varying and Dynamic Rate Design (Faruqui)

– Rate Design Where Advanced Metering Infrastructure Has Not Been Fully Deployed (Lazar)

– Pricing Do’s and Don’ts (Lazar et. al.)

• First two seek to identify examples of creative and forward-looking rate design from around the world.

• Part of RAP Global Best Practices series. Also looked at resource planning, finance, and other topics.

• All focus on the need to align rates with long-run marginal costs, so consumers make good long-run choices.

From Simple to Complex

• Residential Rate Types

– Flat Rate: Uniform rate per kWh for all usage

– Inclining Block: two or more blocks of usage, with incremental usage at a higher price.

– TOU: Two or more time of use periods, with higher prices during higher-cost periods

– TOU with Inclining Block: A TOU rate that includes a lower price for lower levels of usage.

– Critical Peak: A TOU price that has a much higher price for a limited number of hours that are not known until 1 day ahead.

3

4

Peak Load Benefits of Different

Residential Rate Designs

5

Usage Impacts of Rate Design

Start With Example Bill Frequency

Bills

kWh Usage

by Customers

Ending in

Block

% of Sales to

Customer Using

More than Block

Total Block

Sales Including

Sales to

Customers

Exceeding

Block Limit

% of Sales In

Block

0 - 250 154,281 22,705,353 92% 118,791,853 42%

250 - 500 176,985 64,370,066 69% 71,964,066 25%

500 - 750 94,209 57,617,207 49% 38,800,707 14%

750 - 1,000 49,741 42,864,074 34% 21,411,074 8%

>1,000 63,411 95,831,158 0% 32,420,158 11%

538,627 283,387,858 283,387,858

6

Flat vs. Inclining Block

Flat Rate Design

Total Sales 283,387,858

Flat Rate: 0.15$

Revenue 42,508,179$

Inclining Block Rate Design, 2 blocks, 1 : 1.5 Ratio

Block Sales Rate Revenue

0 - 250 118,791,853 0.11624$ 13,808,643$

>250 164,596,005 0.17436$ 28,699,536$

Total: 42,508,179$

7

Elasticity Impact of Inclining

Block Rate Design

Elasticity Effect of 2 Block Rate

Block

Sales Subject

to End Block

Rate Change

From Flat

Rate % Rate Change

Change In

Usage With

-0.2 Elasticity

0 - 250 22,705,353 (0.0338)$ -22.5% 1,021,973

>250 260,682,505 0.0244$ 16.2% -8,468,186

Net Impact on Consumption: -7,446,213

% Change in Consumption -2.6%

Inclining Block Rate with Constant Elasticity of -0.20 for Both Blocks

8

Effect of a

High Customer Charge • Instead of an inclining block rate, what happens if we

introduce a $25/month customer charge?

Imposing a Customer Charge of $25/month

Monthly Bills 538,627

Customer Charge Revenue @ $25/month 13,465,675$

Energy Revenue Requirement 29,042,504$

Energy Sales (kWh) 283,387,858

Price per kWh 0.1025$

Rate change (0.0475)$

Percent Rate change -31.7%

Elasticity Effect at -0.2 17,954,233

% Increase in Sales 6.3%

9

The Most Common Residential

Rate Design: Inclining Block

• Globally, we found that the most common residential rate design was the inclining block rate. Nearly universal in the Western US, Mexico, China, India, Brazil, South Africa, and parts of Europe.

• Most have zero or very low service charges.

• Goals include:

– Allocation of limited low-cost resources

– Recognition of declining load factor as usage increases

– Encouragement of conservation

– Providing for essential needs at affordable cost

– Benefit to low-income consumers

What Does This Rate Design Say?

The average cost of ice cream is $1.50/scoop, $1.125/scoop, and $.9167/scoop? Or:

10

Eat more ice cream!

Inclining Block Rate

Based on Resource Types

• Start with typical cost of resources;

• Determine how much of each the utility has available for the class;

• Set blocks to recover costs;

11

Block kWh Energy Delivery Total

Hydro 250 0.02$ 0.06$ 0.08$

Coal 251 - 750 0.04$ 0.06$ 0.10$

New Supply >750 0.10$ 0.06$ 0.16$

Inclining Block Rate

Based on Load Factor

• Start with a typical Commercial rate:

–$10/kW/month + $.08/kWh

• Determine Load Factor of Each Usage Block

• Compute Block Rates

12

Primary Usage kWh

Load

Factor Demand Energy Total

Lights/Appliances 400 70% 0.020$ 0.08$ 0.100$

Water Heat 401- 800 40% 0.035$ 0.08$ 0.115$

Space Conditioning >800 20% 0.069$ 0.08$ 0.149$

13

California

• California IOUs have steeply inclining block rates with low customer charges, as do some POUs.

• CPUC is examining possible changes, including mandatory TOU and higher customer charges.

Palo Alto

Customer Charge None

First 300 kWh 0.0954$

Next 300 kwh 0.1302$

Over 600 kWh 0.1740$

PG&E

Customer Charge None

Baseline Usage 0.1323$

101% - 130% 0.1504$

131% - 200% 0.3111$

Over 200% 0.3511$

Baseline = 270 - 1,200 kWh/mo

SCE

Customer Charge 3.00$

Baseline Usage 0.1295$

101% - 130% 0.1607$

131% - 200% 0.2719$

Over 200% 0.3119$

Baseline = 270 - 1,200 kWh/mo

14

China and India • One-third of the world’s population.

• Developing countries, but with near-universal service

• Steeply inclining blocks, with zero customer charge

Zhejiang Province Rates China Daily, July 2, 2012

Annual Usage

Equivalent

Monthly

Usage RMB/kWh $/kWh

<2,760 <230 0.538 0.087$

2,761 - 4,800 230 - 400 0.558 0.090$

>4,800 >400 0.838 0.136$

15

South Africa • Half of electricity consumption in Africa

• Very sophisticated utility; moving to TOU and CPP

16

Mexico

• One national utility, serving 100 million people.

• Multiple rate zones; slightly different rates

• Huge step-up above 450 kWh/month

• Solar water heating nearly universal in new construction.

Federal Electricity Commission

Zone 1C Rates at 4/25/2013

kWh Pesos USD

Customer Charge None

<150 kWh $0.69 $0.056

150 - 300 $0.80 $0.065

300 - 450 $1.03 $0.084

Over 450 kwh $2.74 $0.225

17

Hungary

• High costs, including about 25% in taxes, embedded in electricity rates.

• Very low usage per household; little A/C and mostly district heating and hot water.

18

Indonesia: Differentials Based on

Connected Load

• PLN is the world’s largest electric utility, serving about 250 million people.

• Government support provided for line extensions to unserved population.

• Limited low-cost government-owned hydro

19

Arizona Public Service

Seasonal + Inclining Block • Arizona has a very distinct summer daytime peak,

driven by air conditioning load.

• Load-Factor Based Inclining Block Rate

• Optional TOU Rate Available

Arizona Public Service Company

Standard Plan (Optional TOU Available)

Winter Summer

0 - 400 kWh 0.0942$ 0.0969$

401 - 800 kWh 0.0942$ 0.1382$

801 - 3,000 kWh 0.0942$ 0.1617$

Over 3,000 kWh 0.0942$ 0.1726$

20

Fixed Period TOU Rates • Many utilities have introduced fixed-period TOU rates.

• These require interval meters, but not AMI

• France (70% nuclear) has been a leader.

• Annual subscription is a 100% demand ratchet

EDF Heures

Rate:

21

Fixed-Period Time of Use Rates

California: Pro-Rated Usage • California IOUs retain the inclining block rate design

within their TOU (optional) rate designs;

• Usage is pro-rated among the tiers (if 15% of your total use is on-peak, then 15% of your use is charged on-peak)

PG&E TOU Rate Rate E-6 Off-Peak Mid-Peak Peak

Customer Charge 7.59$

Baseline Usage 0.1007$ 0.1753$ 0.2872$

101% - 130% 0.1188$ 0.1934$ 0.3053$

131% - 200% 0.2798$ 0.3543$ 0.4662$

Over 200% 0.3198$ 0.3943$ 0.5062$

22

Fixed-Period TOU Rates

With Inclining Block Design • An alternative to pro-rating is to provide a fixed $/kWh

discount (or surcharge) below (above) the baseline level.

• Puget Sound Energy did this for their TOU rate

23

Peak Load Management

Without AMI • Many utilities

have peak interruption programs controlled by the utility.

• Midwest coops often REQUIRE that electric water heaters be under utility control.

24

Rates That Require AMI

PTR; CPP; VPP; RTP

• Peak-Time Rebate: A customer gets a credit if they reduce their usage during peak events. No penalty if they do not.

• Critical Peak Price: A high price defined in advance that takes effect on a day-ahead notice basis.

• Variable Peak Price: A price that is set one day ahead that takes effect when noticed by the utility

• Real-Time Price: A price that is set by the market, and may change with one-hour notice.

25

Peak Time Rebate (PTR)

• Risk-Free: Customer can win, but cannot lose.

• Events are noticed, generally day-ahead

• San Diego Gas and Electric “Reduce Your Use” Rate

– A “Use Less Than” amount is set at program signup

– Email or Text notification when events occur

– 11 AM to 6 PM time period

– $.75/kWh for manual reduction

– $1.25/kWh for technology-enabled reduction

– No minimum or maximum periods per year

• “Training wheels” for Critical Peak Pricing (CPP)

26

Critical Peak Pricing

Eskom South Africa “RuralFlex”

• 17 days per year maximum; Day-Ahead Notice

27

Critical Peak Pricing:

France: TEMPO • Tempo unit shows what price in effect

• All days have on-peak and off-peak

• Inclining customer charge tied to kVa

• Maximum 22 Red days per year

EDF Tempo

Rate

28

Enabling Technology

For CPP and RTP

• Installation of energy management devices that automatically adjust energy use when a price signal is received.

– Air conditioning

– Process and water heat

– Cold storage refrigeration

– Eventually, minor loads like refrigerators, freezers, and laundry equipment

29

Enabling Technology Improves

Price Response

30

Peak Load Reduction

Varies by Pricing Approach

31

Peak Reduction vs.

Energy Reduction

• Inclining block rates produce the most overall reduction in energy usage. This occurs because incremental usage is most discretionary.

• Time-varying prices produce peak load reduction, but may or may not reduce total energy use

– Pre-cooling of buildings may increase total kWh usage

– Curtailment of A/C may lead customers to “not be home” at all, reducing other energy usage

• More complex rates work best with technology enablement.

32

Inclining Block Rates Save Energy

Complex Rates Save Peak

USEPA, Customer Incentives for Energy Efficiency Through Electric and Natural Gas Rate Design, September, 2009

Bill Simplification

33

Which Pricing Approach is More Useful

to You as a Consumer?

Crude Oil 2.237$

Tanker to Refinery 0.114$

Refinery Capital 0.213$

Refinery Operating 0.235$

Product Pipeline 0.113$

Terminal Rack 0.023$

Truck to MiniMart 0.114$

Mini-Mart Profit 0.217$

State Taxes 0.349$

Federal Taxes 0.184$

So Why Do We

Confuse Electric Consumers?

35

Your Usage: 1,266 kWh

Base Rate Rate Usage Amount

First 500 kWh 0.04000$ 500 20.00$

Next 500 kWh 0.06000$ 500 30.00$

Over 1,000 kwh 0.08000$ 266 21.28$

Fuel Adjustment Charge 0.03456$ 1,266 43.75$

Infrastructure Tracker 0.00789$ 1,266 9.99$

Decoupling Adjustment (0.00057)$ 1,266 (0.72)$

Conservation Program Charge 0.00123$ 1,266 1.56$

Nuclear Decommissioning 0.00037$ 1,266 0.47$

Subtotal: 126.33$

State Tax 5% 6.32$

City Tax 6% 7.96$

Total Due 140.60$

When This is What It Really Means

SIMPLIFY WHAT YOU

PUT ON THE BILL!

36

EFFECTIVE RATE INCLUDING ALL ADJUSTMENTS

First 500 kWh 0.09291$ 500 46.46$

Next 500 kWh 0.11517$ 500 57.59$

Over 1,000 kwh 0.13743$ 266 36.56$

140.60$

37

Recommended Publications

Rate Design Where Advanced Metering Infrastructure Has Not

Been Fully Deployed

http://www.raponline.org/document/download/id/6516

Time-Varying and Dynamic Rate Design

http://www.raponline.org/document/download/id/5131

Pricing Do's and Don'ts: Designing Retail Rates as if

Efficiency Counts

http://www.raponline.org/document/download/id/939

Customer Incentives for Energy Efficiency Through Electric

and Natural Gas Rate Design

http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/documents/suca/rate_design.

pdf

About RAP

The Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP) is a global, non-profit team of experts that focuses on the long-term economic and environmental sustainability of the power and natural gas sectors. RAP has deep expertise in regulatory and market policies that:

Promote economic efficiency Protect the environment Ensure system reliability Allocate system benefits fairly among all consumers

Learn more about RAP at www.raponline.org

Jim Lazar, RAP Senior Advisor

[email protected]