Global Air Quality and Pollution By Hajime Akimoto Summary by Ricky Paredes Critique by Jesse Kantor...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Global Air Quality and Pollution By Hajime Akimoto Summary by Ricky Paredes Critique by Jesse Kantor...
Global Air Quality and Global Air Quality and PollutionPollution
By Hajime AkimotoBy Hajime Akimoto
Summary by Ricky ParedesSummary by Ricky ParedesCritique by Jesse KantorCritique by Jesse Kantor
EE563 Winter 2004EE563 Winter 2004
SummarySummary
•IntroductionIntroduction
•Remote Sensing Remote Sensing
•Tropospheric OzoneTropospheric Ozone
•Carbon Monoxide (CO)Carbon Monoxide (CO)
•AerosolsAerosols
•Intercontinental TransportIntercontinental Transport
•MegacitiesMegacities
IntroductionIntroduction
• The impact of global air pollution on climate and the environment is a new focus in atmospheric science
• Air pollution jeopardizes agricultural and natural ecosystems
• Air pollution has strong effect on climate change– Aerosols change global climate through their direct and indirect
effects on radiative forcing.– Radiative forcing is the change in the balance between radiation
coming into the atmosphere and radiation going out. A positive radiative forcing tends to warm the surface of the Earth, and negative forcing tends to cool the surface.
• In the 1990’s nitrogen oxide emissions from Asia surpassed those from North America and Europe and should continue to exceed them for decades.
IntroductionIntroduction
• Air pollution is international issue– First became clear when MAPS (1981)
measured high levels of CO in Asia, Africa, and South America.
– Major contributors:• Fossil fuel combustion• Biomass burning
– Forest fires – Agricultural waste burning– Vegetable fuel combustion
IntroductionIntroduction
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
• MAPS (Measurement of Air Pollution from Satellite)– Launched in 1981
– Global distribution of CO
– High concentrations of CO over:• Tropical Asia• Africa• South America
– Air pollution as an international issue
Remote SensingRemote Sensing• TOMS (Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer)
– Tropospheric and Stratospheric Ozone measurements– On Nimbus 7 satellite– Measurements in Antarctica are shown below (notice the growing ozone
hole)
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
• The TOMS is the first instrument to allow observation of aerosols as the particles cross the land/sea boundary.
• Using this data, it is possible to observe a wide range of phenomena such as desert dust storms, forest fires and biomass burning.
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
Remote SensingRemote Sensing• MOPITT (Measurement of Pollution in the Troposphere)
– Measures carbon monoxide (CO) in the troposphere
Remote SensingRemote Sensing• MOPITT in action
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
• GOME (Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment)– Measures nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in the troposphere
Tropospheric OzoneTropospheric Ozone• Potent greenhouse gas that is toxic to
– Humans• May cause permanent damage to lungs
• Inhaling it triggers chest pains, coughing, nausea, throat irritation, and congestion.
– Animals– Plant life
Tropospheric OzoneTropospheric Ozone
• Lifetime of tropospheric ozone:– 1 to 2 weeks in the summer– 1 to 2 months in the winter
• Hemispherical transport – Characteristical timescale = 1 month– Occurs in all seasons except summer
• Therefore tropospheric ozone can be transported intercontinentally
Tropospheric OzoneTropospheric Ozone
• Model-Calculated surface O3 during the growing season in the Northern Hemisphere in 1860 and 1993
Tropospheric OzoneTropospheric Ozone• Spatial extent of global ozone pollution
– The average concentration of ozone in remote areas of East Asia is already high enough to jeopardize agricultural and natural ecosystems there.
• Hence, long range transport of ozone can cause the addition of ozone produced locally or regionally to exceed critical levels.
• Small increments of ozone concentrations caused by contributions from other continents an issue of great concern
Carbon Monoxide (CO)Carbon Monoxide (CO)• Atmospheric lifetime of CO is also long
enough to allow intercontinental transport and hemispherical air pollution
• Significant portion of CO pollution is from automobiles and biomass burning
• Global pollution by CO is worrisome because of its effect on the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere
Aerosols Aerosols • Aerosols are tiny particles suspended in the air.• Some occur naturally, originating from volcanoes, dust
storms, forest and grassland fires, living vegetation, and sea spray.
• Human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels and the alteration of natural surface cover, also generate aerosols.
• Averaged over the globe, aerosols made by human activities currently account for about 10 percent of the total amount of aerosols in our atmosphere.
• Most of that 10 percent is concentrated in the Northern Hemisphere, especially downwind of industrial sites, slash-and-burn agricultural regions, and overgrazed grasslands.
AerosolsAerosols• Lifetime of aerosol is about 1 to 2 weeks
– Have a more uneven distribution than ozone– More concentrated near their source regions
over continents and in the boundary layer
• The more uneven distribution of tropospheric aerosols causes highly heterogeneous radiative forcing, which can lead to climate effects occurring regionally and globally
AerosolsAerosols
Intercontinental TransportIntercontinental Transport
• Studies of transboundary air pollution led – To the investigation of possible
intercontinental transport and hemispheric air pollution
• Trans-Pacific transport of trace gases from Asia to North America has been reported most frequently
• This Asian outflow enhances the concentration of surface ozone in the US by a few ppbv
Intercontinental TransportIntercontinental Transport
• Trans-Atlantic transport from North America to Europe has been investigated– North America pollution contributes an
average of 5 ppbv to surface O3 on the west coast of Ireland
– And about 2 to 4 ppbv over Europe in the summer
• The influence of North American pollution on European air quality is seen most frequently in the free troposphere.
Intercontinental TransportIntercontinental Transport• Transport of European outflow across Eurasia to
Asia has scarcely been studied• Substantial amount of air travels from Europe to
East Asia in winter and early Spring.• Measurements of air pollutants over Eurasia
made using commercial airlines have revealed high concentrations of O3 in the upper troposphere
• Export of nitrogen oxides are the major sources over polluted continents and the clean ocean.
Intercontinental TransportIntercontinental Transport• Study of the intercontinental transport and
chemical transformation of O3 between North America, Europe, and Asia using a global chemical transport model
Intercontinental TransportIntercontinental Transport
Intercontinental TransportIntercontinental Transport
• Intercontinental transport of O3 from East Asia (to North America and Europe) occurs mostly in the middle and upper troposphere.
• Intercontinental Transport of O3 from Europe affects mainly near-surface O3 concentrations in East Asia.
• The O3 from the US affects Europe in the boundary layer and middle and upper troposphere.
Intercontinental TransportIntercontinental Transport• NOx emissions from North America and Europe have been nearly
equal since 1980• Stringent emission control in western European countries after 1990• Asian emissions have increased rapidly and are expected to
continue for at least the next couple of decades
Intercontinental TransportIntercontinental Transport
• Future increases of emissions from Africa and South America, because of the economic growth there, would make global air quality more of an issue in the Southern Hemisphere
• Southern Hemisphere is a region where only biomass burning has been considered important so far.
MegacitiesMegacities
• Important source of regional and global pollution
• Defined as a metropolitan area with over 10 million inhabitants
• 17 megacities in 2001
• With rapid growth in developing countries, megacities become major contributors of pollution
MegacitiesMegacities
• Megacities that have three or more pollutants that exceed the WHO (World Health Organization) health protection guidelines:– Beijing (China)
– Sao Palo (Brazil)
– Moscow (Russia)
– Los Angeles (USA)
– Cairo (Egypt)
– Jakarta (Indonesia)
– Mexico City (Mexico)• Mexico City was classified as having serious problems for sulfur
dioxide, carbon monoxide, and ozone in addition to heavy pollution for lead and nitrogen dioxide. Mexico City suffers in particular due to its high altitude and climate which results in poor ventilation, in addition to the large number of old and poorly maintained vehicles.
MegacitiesMegacities
Author’s ConclusionAuthor’s Conclusion
• Local, regional, and global air-quality issues, and regional and global environmental impacts, including climate change, should be viewed in an integrated manner.
CritiqueCritique
By Jesse KantorBy Jesse Kantor
CRITIQUECRITIQUE
• Why should we believe his conclusions about the increasing global pollution?
• Does he have enough data to support his conclusions?
Many SatellitesMany Satellites
• Air Pollution Measuring Satellites– MAPS(Measurement of Air Pollution from Satellite)– MOPITT(Measurement of pollution in Troposphere)– SCHIAMACHY(Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectro-meter for
Atmospheric Cartography)• Ozone Measuring Satellites
– TOMS(Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer)– GOME(Global Ozone Monitoring Experiments)
• Aerosol Measuring Satellites– SEAWIFS(Sea Viewing Wide-Field-of-View Sensor Data)– AVHRR(Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometers)– MODIS(Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer on Terra Satellite)– SAGE(Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment on Nimbus 7 satellite)
• Total– 9 Satellites (A large amount of information sources)
ReferencesReferences
• 48 sources(A large amount)
• Only 3 written by Akimoto– This is 6.25 percent
• Many of sources were written in the past 10 years
• The large amount of references gives credibility to the paper
No Old SourcesNo Old Sources
• Is it good to have only recent sources?– J. Lelieveld, F. Dentener wrote “high-latitude Eurasian and North
American continents was 15 to 25 parts per billion by volume (ppbv) in 1860 but has increased to 40-50 ppbv even in relatively remote areas” (2000)
– Brings into doubt their estimation of historical information since satellite sensor technology is relatively new
– It is excellent to have current sources which show that experts currently believe we have greatly increasing global pollution
– It is difficult to believe they are entirely correct about how fast it is increasing
– They may also not know all the causes• Many factors contribute to pollution such as biomass pollution
(forest fires, agricultural waste burning)
Critique of Major ArgumentCritique of Major Argument
• His major claim is that small concentrations of ozone from other continents can push endangered regions to a “critical mass”
• His arguments are very convincing that we have pollution problems• It was not as believable that one continents pollution is having a
great effect on other countries• Akimoto writes “One example of the special extent of global ozone
pollution is that the average concentration of ozone in remote areas of East Asia is already high enough to jeopardize agriculture and natural ecosystems there”
• He assumes that these remote areas are polluted by other continents
• It is more likely that pollution in rural Asia comes from urban Asia
Good PointGood Point
• The lifetime of these pollutants last long enough to spread (1 week-2 months) globally– We need to be concerned with this possibility
• Some pollutants have more effect globally than others– Tropospheric ozone and CO are more harmful
globally because their lifetimes are 1-2 months– Aerosol is not as global
• Its lifetime is 1-2 weeks• Any global effects are episodic• It mainly affects local and regional areas
Same Old ArgumentSame Old Argument
• It is just difficult to prove how much 1 continent is affected by another
• It is difficult to see the effects of pollution.– This makes it difficult to motivate people to do
something about it
Final Argument: Intercontinental Final Argument: Intercontinental PollutionPollution
• He has 11 sources showing some evidence of intercontinental transport of gases– Note: These were not harmful gases they tracked– They have not observed ozone transport, only
measured increases of ozone in certain areas– On the other hand, just because we haven’t observed
it, it doesn’t mean it is not there– If it is true for other gases, we should be concerned
about ozone
Counter Arguments to Counter Arguments to Intercontinental PollutionIntercontinental Pollution
• Trans Atlantic transport of O3 and CO from North America to Europe were studied for 6 years but few episodes of intercontinental pollution were identified
• Transport of European outflow across Eurasia has scarcely been studied
• Most of evidence presented by Akimoto that supports global pollution more clearly was done through modeling
• Hard evidence is more concrete than modeling• Last page showed more proof of the large amount of
pollution rather than the intercontinental effects of pollution
ConclusionConclusion
• This was a good article
• It may not completely prove all its points but it does show we need to be concerned and do more studies of intercontinental pollution
The EndThe End
• Questions?
• Comments?