Glendive Public Meeting Presentation - Copy
Transcript of Glendive Public Meeting Presentation - Copy
-
City of GlendiveWastewater System Improvements
Public MeetingPublic MeetingApril 26, 2011
April 2011
Presented by:
Craig Pozega, PEGreat West Engineering, Inc.
-
Why Are We Here?
City has identified wastewater system needs
Wastewater System Preliminary Engineering Report
PUBLIC COMMENT
-
Preliminary Engineering Report
What is a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER)Problem DefinitionDescribes existing systemEvaluate Alternatives including Selection of a Preferred
AlternativeEstablishes Costs and Potential Funding ScenariosEstablishes Costs and Potential Funding ScenariosImplementation ScheduleRequired by Funding Agencies to qualify for GrantsPUBLIC COMMENT
-
Problem Definition
Montana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (MPDES) PermitMust have a MPDES permit to discharge wastewaterThe City of Glendive was issued a new MPDES Permit
in December 2007Permit contains many new monitoring, reporting and Permit contains many new monitoring, reporting and
recording requirementsCompliance schedule to meet future permit limits
-
Problem Definition
Water QualitySecondary StandardsAmmoniaNutrientsWhole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
Wastewater DisinfectionCurrently no disinfection of discharged effluent
Exposed BiosolidsVector Attraction
-
Planning Area
-
Evaluation of Existing System
2010 PopulationGlendive 4,935 people
Projected Population (2030)Glendive 5,000 peopleWest Glendive 2,226 peopleWest Glendive 2,226 peopleAnnexation Areas 743 peopleTotal With West Glendive 7,969 peopleTotal Without West Glendive 5,743 people
-
Evaluation of Existing System
Existing and Design FlowsDesign Flow with West Glendive 1,100,000 gpdDesign Flow without West Glendive 800,000 gpd
-
Evaluation of Existing System
The Collection System comprised of 22 miles of pipe, manholes, and 5 lift stations
The Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) consists of a three-cell facultative lagoon system with discharge to Glendive Creek
Collection system installed between 1906 and 2007 - Mostly before 1930
Lagoons originally constructed in 1959-1960Upgraded in 1976 and 1996
-
Evaluation of Existing System
Facultative Lagoon3 cells (21.1, 24.1 & 25 acres)Aeration transfer structuresDischarge to Glendive CreekNo effluent disinfection
-
Evaluation of Existing System
Identified DeficienciesExisting Treatment can not meet some existing and
future permit limitsCollection (Minor)
Gravity sewer lines have some O&M issues such as slow flow, root problems, and flat slopesflow, root problems, and flat slopes
Lift Stations (Minor) Backup power to two lift stations, SCADA system to tie all
together, possibly new pumps at Husky
Collection and lift stations are minor deficiencies compared to the treatment deficiencies
-
Alternative Screening Process
Wastewater Treatment AlternativesMechanically Aerated Lagoons with Storage and
IrrigationBiological Nutrient Removal (BNR) Package
Mechanical Treatment PlantSequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) Mechanical Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) Mechanical
Treatment PlantLagoon/Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (Lagoon/MBBR)
-
Storage & Irrigation
250-350 acres required for irrigation
-
Storage & Irrigation Advantages & Disadvantages
Avoids ammonia toxicity & WET issuesAvoids nutrient & TMDL issuesCurrently no discharge permit requiredFuture regulatory permitting?Limited expansion capabilityWater rights (New Legislation)Large land area required
-
New SBR/BNR Site Location
-
BNR Site Layout
-
BNR Plant
-
SBR Site Layout
-
SBR Plant
-
SBR/BNR Plant
Advantages & DisadvantagesChange point of discharge to Yellowstone RiverMeets ammonia toxicity & WET permit limitsProvides greatest treatment of all alternativesPending nutrient & TMDLCan be upgradedCan be upgraded
-
Lagoon/MBBR Site Plan
-
Lagoon/MBBR Reactor Layout
-
Lagoon/MBBR Hybrid
Advantages & DisadvantagesChange point of discharge to Yellowstone RiverMeets ammonia toxicity & WET permit limitsProvides greater treatment than existing lagoonsPending nutrient & TMDLEasy to operateEasy to operateCan be upgraded into IFAS system to meet future
regulations but expensive
-
Preliminary Cost Estimates
Table 8.4.3Preferred Alternatives
Present Worth Analysis
ITEM
ALTERNATIVE T-1 Mechanically
Aerated Lagoons with Storage and
Irrigation
ALTERNATIVE T-2 Biological Nutrient
Removal (BNR) Mechanical
Treatment Plant
ALTERNATIVE T-3 Sequencing Batch
Reactor (SBR) Mechanical
Treatment Plant
ALTERNATIVE T-4 Lagoon/Moving Bed
Biofilm Reactor (Lagoon/MBBR)
Capital Costs $9,569,000 $8,836,000 $7,200,000 $6,007,000
Annual O&M Costs $231,700 $278,800 $275,100 $200,500
20-Year Salvage Value $413,000 $1,130,000 $853,000 $200,000
Present Worth of Salvage Value $128,800 $352,300 $266,000 $62,400
Present Worth of Annual O&M Cost $72,200 $86,900 $85,800 $62,500
Present Worth Cost1 $9,512,400 $8,570,600 $7,019,800 $6,007,100
1Present worth based upon a 20 year life cycle using calculated discount rate.
-
Criteria Used to Rank Alternatives
1. Technical Feasibility
2. Environmental Impacts
3. Life Cycle Cost
4. Public Health and Safety4. Public Health and Safety
5. Operational and Maintenance
6. Public Opinion
-
Selection of Preferred Alternative
Table 8.5Table 8.5Table 8.5Table 8.5
Decision MatrixDecision MatrixDecision MatrixDecision Matrix
AlternativeAlternativeAlternativeAlternative
Technical Technical Technical Technical
FeasibilityFeasibilityFeasibilityFeasibility
Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental
ImpactsImpactsImpactsImpacts
Life Cycle Life Cycle Life Cycle Life Cycle
CostCostCostCost
Public Health Public Health Public Health Public Health
and Safetyand Safetyand Safetyand Safety
Operation and Operation and Operation and Operation and
MaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenancePublic OpinionPublic OpinionPublic OpinionPublic Opinion
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
Weight:Weight:Weight:Weight:8888
Weight:Weight:Weight:Weight:5555
Weight:Weight:Weight:Weight:10101010
Weight:Weight:Weight:Weight:6666
Weight:Weight:Weight:Weight:10101010
Weight:Weight:Weight:Weight:5555
ScoreScoreScoreScore Wtd.Wtd.Wtd.Wtd. ScoreScoreScoreScore Wtd.Wtd.Wtd.Wtd. ScoreScoreScoreScore WtdWtdWtdWtd.... ScoreScoreScoreScore Wtd.Wtd.Wtd.Wtd. ScoreScoreScoreScore WtdWtdWtdWtd.... ScoreScoreScoreScore WtdWtdWtdWtd....
Storage & 6.0 48 8.0 40 2.1 21 6.0 36 7.0 70 0 215215215215
Storage &
Irrigation6.0 48 8.0 40 2.1 21 6.0 36 7.0 70 0 215215215215
BNR Plant 8.0 64 7.0 35 4.0 40 7.0 42 6.0 60 0 241241241241
SBR Plant 8.0 64 7.0 35 5.7 57 7.0 42 5.0 50 0 248248248248
MBBR4.0 32 5.0 25 7.9 79 5.0 30 6.0 60 0 226226226226
It is important to note that the above scoring and weighting are subjective. Alternatives that score overall within 10 pts of each other may
essentially hold the same degree of preference.
-
Selection of Preferred Alternative
Draft Preferred Alternative for WWTP Mechanical Treatment Plant BNR or SBR Technology
SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON PUBLIC INPUTSUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON PUBLIC INPUT Estimated Cost of Draft Preferred Alternative = $8,570,600 Annual Estimated Cost for O&M = $278,800
-
Project Funding Strategy
Target Rate Analysis for Department of Commerce Grant Eligibility
Median Household Income (MHI) = $30,943
Department of Commerce Target Rate Threshold
Water Systems = 1.4% of MHI
Sewer Systems = 0.9% of MHI
Combined Rate = 2.3% of MHI
(Combined Rate Applies to Communities Which Have Both Systems)
City of Glendive Target Rate = ($30,943)(2.3%)
= $711.69/year$59.31/month
Current Average Water Rate $32.97/month
Current Average Sewer Rate $12.21/month
Combined Rate $45.18/month
Low & Moderate Income Percent = 37.3%
-
Project Funding StrategyTable 10.1.2
City of GlendiveFunding Options for BNR Wastewater Treatment Facility
ITEM
SCENARIO #1 SCENARIO #2 SCENARIO #3TSEP, DNRC Grants w/o
City Reserves, w/ SRF Loan (3.75% / 20 yrs)
TSEP Grant w/o City Reserves & SRF Loan
(3.75% / 20 yrs)
No Grants w/o City Reserves & SRF Loan
(3.75% / 20 yrs)TOTAL PROJECT COST $8,893,000 $8,893,000 $8,893,000TSEP Grant $500,000 $500,000DNRC Grant $100,000Town Reserves $0 $0 $0TSEP Planning Grant $15,000 $15,000 $15,000DNRC Planning Grant $5,000 $5,000 $5,000SRF Loan (20 Years) $8,273,000 $8,373,000 $8,873,000SRF Loan (20 Years) $8,273,000 $8,373,000 $8,873,000
User Capital Cost/Month $18.33 $18.56 $19.66
Total Projected Annual O&M Costs $630,800 $630,800 $630,800
User O&M Cost/Month $14.49 $14.49 $14.49
Total Proposed Average Residential Sewer Cost/Month $32.82 $33.05 $34.15
Percent of Combined Target Rate 110.9% 111.3% 113.2%
-
Where to go from Here?
Public Comment on Draft PER
Final PER
Preliminary Design and Permitting Sept 2011
Submit Grant Applications April 2012 Submit Grant Applications April 2012
Advertise and Bid Project February 2014
Construction Project April November 2014
-
Comments
www.greatwesteng.comwww.greatwesteng.comwww.greatwesteng.comwww.greatwesteng.com
HELENA
PO Box 4817 2030 11th Avenue Helena, MT 59604
Phone 406.449.8627 Fax 406.449.8631
BOZEMAN
602 Ferguson Avenue Suite #1 Bozeman, MT 59718
Phone 406.587.0504 Fax 406.587.0541
BILLINGS
115 N. Broadway, Suite 500 Billings, MT 59101
Phone 406.652.5000 Fax 406.248.1363