Glendive Public Meeting Presentation - Copy

31
City of Glendive Wastewater System Improvements Public Meeting Public Meeting April 26, 2011 April 2011 Presented by: Craig Pozega, PE Great West Engineering, Inc.

Transcript of Glendive Public Meeting Presentation - Copy

  • City of GlendiveWastewater System Improvements

    Public MeetingPublic MeetingApril 26, 2011

    April 2011

    Presented by:

    Craig Pozega, PEGreat West Engineering, Inc.

  • Why Are We Here?

    City has identified wastewater system needs

    Wastewater System Preliminary Engineering Report

    PUBLIC COMMENT

  • Preliminary Engineering Report

    What is a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER)Problem DefinitionDescribes existing systemEvaluate Alternatives including Selection of a Preferred

    AlternativeEstablishes Costs and Potential Funding ScenariosEstablishes Costs and Potential Funding ScenariosImplementation ScheduleRequired by Funding Agencies to qualify for GrantsPUBLIC COMMENT

  • Problem Definition

    Montana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (MPDES) PermitMust have a MPDES permit to discharge wastewaterThe City of Glendive was issued a new MPDES Permit

    in December 2007Permit contains many new monitoring, reporting and Permit contains many new monitoring, reporting and

    recording requirementsCompliance schedule to meet future permit limits

  • Problem Definition

    Water QualitySecondary StandardsAmmoniaNutrientsWhole Effluent Toxicity (WET)

    Wastewater DisinfectionCurrently no disinfection of discharged effluent

    Exposed BiosolidsVector Attraction

  • Planning Area

  • Evaluation of Existing System

    2010 PopulationGlendive 4,935 people

    Projected Population (2030)Glendive 5,000 peopleWest Glendive 2,226 peopleWest Glendive 2,226 peopleAnnexation Areas 743 peopleTotal With West Glendive 7,969 peopleTotal Without West Glendive 5,743 people

  • Evaluation of Existing System

    Existing and Design FlowsDesign Flow with West Glendive 1,100,000 gpdDesign Flow without West Glendive 800,000 gpd

  • Evaluation of Existing System

    The Collection System comprised of 22 miles of pipe, manholes, and 5 lift stations

    The Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) consists of a three-cell facultative lagoon system with discharge to Glendive Creek

    Collection system installed between 1906 and 2007 - Mostly before 1930

    Lagoons originally constructed in 1959-1960Upgraded in 1976 and 1996

  • Evaluation of Existing System

    Facultative Lagoon3 cells (21.1, 24.1 & 25 acres)Aeration transfer structuresDischarge to Glendive CreekNo effluent disinfection

  • Evaluation of Existing System

    Identified DeficienciesExisting Treatment can not meet some existing and

    future permit limitsCollection (Minor)

    Gravity sewer lines have some O&M issues such as slow flow, root problems, and flat slopesflow, root problems, and flat slopes

    Lift Stations (Minor) Backup power to two lift stations, SCADA system to tie all

    together, possibly new pumps at Husky

    Collection and lift stations are minor deficiencies compared to the treatment deficiencies

  • Alternative Screening Process

    Wastewater Treatment AlternativesMechanically Aerated Lagoons with Storage and

    IrrigationBiological Nutrient Removal (BNR) Package

    Mechanical Treatment PlantSequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) Mechanical Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) Mechanical

    Treatment PlantLagoon/Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (Lagoon/MBBR)

  • Storage & Irrigation

    250-350 acres required for irrigation

  • Storage & Irrigation Advantages & Disadvantages

    Avoids ammonia toxicity & WET issuesAvoids nutrient & TMDL issuesCurrently no discharge permit requiredFuture regulatory permitting?Limited expansion capabilityWater rights (New Legislation)Large land area required

  • New SBR/BNR Site Location

  • BNR Site Layout

  • BNR Plant

  • SBR Site Layout

  • SBR Plant

  • SBR/BNR Plant

    Advantages & DisadvantagesChange point of discharge to Yellowstone RiverMeets ammonia toxicity & WET permit limitsProvides greatest treatment of all alternativesPending nutrient & TMDLCan be upgradedCan be upgraded

  • Lagoon/MBBR Site Plan

  • Lagoon/MBBR Reactor Layout

  • Lagoon/MBBR Hybrid

    Advantages & DisadvantagesChange point of discharge to Yellowstone RiverMeets ammonia toxicity & WET permit limitsProvides greater treatment than existing lagoonsPending nutrient & TMDLEasy to operateEasy to operateCan be upgraded into IFAS system to meet future

    regulations but expensive

  • Preliminary Cost Estimates

    Table 8.4.3Preferred Alternatives

    Present Worth Analysis

    ITEM

    ALTERNATIVE T-1 Mechanically

    Aerated Lagoons with Storage and

    Irrigation

    ALTERNATIVE T-2 Biological Nutrient

    Removal (BNR) Mechanical

    Treatment Plant

    ALTERNATIVE T-3 Sequencing Batch

    Reactor (SBR) Mechanical

    Treatment Plant

    ALTERNATIVE T-4 Lagoon/Moving Bed

    Biofilm Reactor (Lagoon/MBBR)

    Capital Costs $9,569,000 $8,836,000 $7,200,000 $6,007,000

    Annual O&M Costs $231,700 $278,800 $275,100 $200,500

    20-Year Salvage Value $413,000 $1,130,000 $853,000 $200,000

    Present Worth of Salvage Value $128,800 $352,300 $266,000 $62,400

    Present Worth of Annual O&M Cost $72,200 $86,900 $85,800 $62,500

    Present Worth Cost1 $9,512,400 $8,570,600 $7,019,800 $6,007,100

    1Present worth based upon a 20 year life cycle using calculated discount rate.

  • Criteria Used to Rank Alternatives

    1. Technical Feasibility

    2. Environmental Impacts

    3. Life Cycle Cost

    4. Public Health and Safety4. Public Health and Safety

    5. Operational and Maintenance

    6. Public Opinion

  • Selection of Preferred Alternative

    Table 8.5Table 8.5Table 8.5Table 8.5

    Decision MatrixDecision MatrixDecision MatrixDecision Matrix

    AlternativeAlternativeAlternativeAlternative

    Technical Technical Technical Technical

    FeasibilityFeasibilityFeasibilityFeasibility

    Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental

    ImpactsImpactsImpactsImpacts

    Life Cycle Life Cycle Life Cycle Life Cycle

    CostCostCostCost

    Public Health Public Health Public Health Public Health

    and Safetyand Safetyand Safetyand Safety

    Operation and Operation and Operation and Operation and

    MaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenancePublic OpinionPublic OpinionPublic OpinionPublic Opinion

    TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

    Weight:Weight:Weight:Weight:8888

    Weight:Weight:Weight:Weight:5555

    Weight:Weight:Weight:Weight:10101010

    Weight:Weight:Weight:Weight:6666

    Weight:Weight:Weight:Weight:10101010

    Weight:Weight:Weight:Weight:5555

    ScoreScoreScoreScore Wtd.Wtd.Wtd.Wtd. ScoreScoreScoreScore Wtd.Wtd.Wtd.Wtd. ScoreScoreScoreScore WtdWtdWtdWtd.... ScoreScoreScoreScore Wtd.Wtd.Wtd.Wtd. ScoreScoreScoreScore WtdWtdWtdWtd.... ScoreScoreScoreScore WtdWtdWtdWtd....

    Storage & 6.0 48 8.0 40 2.1 21 6.0 36 7.0 70 0 215215215215

    Storage &

    Irrigation6.0 48 8.0 40 2.1 21 6.0 36 7.0 70 0 215215215215

    BNR Plant 8.0 64 7.0 35 4.0 40 7.0 42 6.0 60 0 241241241241

    SBR Plant 8.0 64 7.0 35 5.7 57 7.0 42 5.0 50 0 248248248248

    MBBR4.0 32 5.0 25 7.9 79 5.0 30 6.0 60 0 226226226226

    It is important to note that the above scoring and weighting are subjective. Alternatives that score overall within 10 pts of each other may

    essentially hold the same degree of preference.

  • Selection of Preferred Alternative

    Draft Preferred Alternative for WWTP Mechanical Treatment Plant BNR or SBR Technology

    SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON PUBLIC INPUTSUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON PUBLIC INPUT Estimated Cost of Draft Preferred Alternative = $8,570,600 Annual Estimated Cost for O&M = $278,800

  • Project Funding Strategy

    Target Rate Analysis for Department of Commerce Grant Eligibility

    Median Household Income (MHI) = $30,943

    Department of Commerce Target Rate Threshold

    Water Systems = 1.4% of MHI

    Sewer Systems = 0.9% of MHI

    Combined Rate = 2.3% of MHI

    (Combined Rate Applies to Communities Which Have Both Systems)

    City of Glendive Target Rate = ($30,943)(2.3%)

    = $711.69/year$59.31/month

    Current Average Water Rate $32.97/month

    Current Average Sewer Rate $12.21/month

    Combined Rate $45.18/month

    Low & Moderate Income Percent = 37.3%

  • Project Funding StrategyTable 10.1.2

    City of GlendiveFunding Options for BNR Wastewater Treatment Facility

    ITEM

    SCENARIO #1 SCENARIO #2 SCENARIO #3TSEP, DNRC Grants w/o

    City Reserves, w/ SRF Loan (3.75% / 20 yrs)

    TSEP Grant w/o City Reserves & SRF Loan

    (3.75% / 20 yrs)

    No Grants w/o City Reserves & SRF Loan

    (3.75% / 20 yrs)TOTAL PROJECT COST $8,893,000 $8,893,000 $8,893,000TSEP Grant $500,000 $500,000DNRC Grant $100,000Town Reserves $0 $0 $0TSEP Planning Grant $15,000 $15,000 $15,000DNRC Planning Grant $5,000 $5,000 $5,000SRF Loan (20 Years) $8,273,000 $8,373,000 $8,873,000SRF Loan (20 Years) $8,273,000 $8,373,000 $8,873,000

    User Capital Cost/Month $18.33 $18.56 $19.66

    Total Projected Annual O&M Costs $630,800 $630,800 $630,800

    User O&M Cost/Month $14.49 $14.49 $14.49

    Total Proposed Average Residential Sewer Cost/Month $32.82 $33.05 $34.15

    Percent of Combined Target Rate 110.9% 111.3% 113.2%

  • Where to go from Here?

    Public Comment on Draft PER

    Final PER

    Preliminary Design and Permitting Sept 2011

    Submit Grant Applications April 2012 Submit Grant Applications April 2012

    Advertise and Bid Project February 2014

    Construction Project April November 2014

  • Comments

    www.greatwesteng.comwww.greatwesteng.comwww.greatwesteng.comwww.greatwesteng.com

    HELENA

    PO Box 4817 2030 11th Avenue Helena, MT 59604

    Phone 406.449.8627 Fax 406.449.8631

    BOZEMAN

    602 Ferguson Avenue Suite #1 Bozeman, MT 59718

    Phone 406.587.0504 Fax 406.587.0541

    BILLINGS

    115 N. Broadway, Suite 500 Billings, MT 59101

    Phone 406.652.5000 Fax 406.248.1363