GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for...
-
Upload
sabina-park -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for...
![Page 1: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
GLD Calorimetry
2005/Mar/03K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U
![Page 2: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
• Current design– To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PF
A) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E) resolution for jets– ECAL: W/Scinti with SiPM analog readout– HCAL: Pb(Fe)/Scinti with SiPM (semi-) digital r
eadout– Other options ?
• SiW ?? (no manpower…)
![Page 3: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The “GLD” model under consideration
SiVTX pixel (cold version)
HCAL(Pb(Fe)/scinti or digital)
W/Scinti ECAL
TPC(Jet chamber as option)
Si intermedi.-Trk
SC-coil
SiVTX pixel
Pb/scinti HCAL
Pb/Scinti ECAL
Jet chamber
Si intermedi.-Trk
SC-coil
“GLC” design (ACFA) “GLD” (world-wide)
![Page 4: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• Area of EM CAL (Barrel + Endcap)– SiD: ~40 m2 / layer– TESLA: ~80 m2 / layer– GLD: ~100 m2 / layer– (GLC: ~130 m2 /layer)
GLD
~2.1m
Comparison of size of EM CAL surface
![Page 5: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Layout of scintillator layers• We have an experience of
– Strip-array ECAL (20cm x 1cm)– Small tile ECAL (4cm x 4cm)
• Ghost clusters from strip-array layers would be easily removed with additional small-tile layers (effective cell size 1cm x 1cm).
• This idea SHOULD be well confirmed by full simulation studies.– If NOT, we would need ECAL with smaller tiles
(2cm x 2cm or less ?)• Strip & Tile CAL can be achieved with SiPM
readout (directly attached to WLS fibers) .
![Page 6: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Common layout for ECAL and HCAL
![Page 7: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Number of readout channels
• With 20cm x 1cm strips and 4cm x 4cm tiles
• ECAL prototype– 650 analog readout channels
• Calorimetry for the real detector– ECAL: ~2.0M analog readout channels.– HCAL: ~5.5M (semi-)digital readout channels– A big challenge !!
• Number of channels could easily change the order depending on the strip/tile size.
![Page 8: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
R&D issues
• Design optimization (scintillator shape and size)– to remove “ghost” clusters– to match tracks and clustersfor particle flow algorithm
• Photo-sensors (SiPM)• Readout electronics• Gain monitoring system • Mechanical structure
![Page 9: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Possible schedule (as of Sep. 2004, very very
preliminary)• 2004-2005
– Design optimization– R&D of SiPM (DPPD)– R&D of readout electronics
• 2005-2006– Construction of an ECAL test module– Tests with cosmic-rays
• 2006-2008– Test beam studies of the ECAL test module
“standalone”– Test beam studies in combination with CALICE
HCAL
![Page 10: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Simulation studies
• Jupiter simulation– Weekly acfa-sim-j TV meeting– CAL and MUD structures are implemented.– Ready for physics studies ?– Study of particle flow algorithm (S. Yamamoto)
• G4 Simulation with simple structure– Energy resolution by M.C. Chuan (Tohoku)– Strip-array ECAL (Tsukuba)– DigiCAL simulation (Shinshu)– Clustering/particle flow algorithm (Kobe)
![Page 11: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Hardware studies
• Scintillator strips/tiles– Being studied in Niigata
• SiPM– Being developed in Hamamatsu– Being tested in Niigata and Kobe
• Readout electronics– Being designed by M. Tanaka at KEK
![Page 12: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Mon power in Japan
• Japanese staffs– KEK (J. Kanzaki)– Kobe U. (K. Kawagoe)– Konan U. (F. Kajino)– Niigata U. (H. Miyata)– Shinshu U. (T. Takeshita)– Tsukuba U. (S. Kim, H. Matsunaga)
• No core staffs at KEK– Problem in keeping activity – Problem in getting budget from KEK
![Page 13: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Budget crisis in FY2005• No money for CAL R&D via KEK ILC group
– Because we have no core staffs at KEK• Japan-US program failed for CAL R&D
– (Partly) because we have no core staffs at KEK• We currently have
– Kakenhi (Takeshita, 2004+2005)– KEK Collaborative development research (Takeshita, 2004+200
5)– Japan-Germany joint project (CAL+TPC, travel money, 2005+200
6)• We are applying / going to apply
– Several Kakenhi proposals– Japan-Russia joint project (with JINR)– Japan-Korea joint project ??
![Page 14: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
International collaborations• Korea
– Kyungpook National U. (K. Cho, D.H. Kim, Y.D. Oh, J.S. Suh )– Seoul National U. (S. Kim )– SungKunKwan U. (I. Yu)– Monthly Japan-Korea TV meeting (2005 Feb ~ )– Japan-Korea CAL meeting in Daegu (2005 July)– They are going to make their own EM prototype
• W-plates, Scintillator, SiPM, electronics• CAL simulation with Mokka
• Russia– JINR (P. Evtukhovitch, et al.) – Peter will visit Japan for 2 months in 2005.– ISTC3000 failed. Planning to apply a new proposal to ISTC.– Applying to the new Japan-Russia joint project (JSPS)
• Good relation with CALICE– Communication with Analog HCAL group at DESY– Tsukuba DC for SiW ECAL beamtest at DESY (2005 Feb ~, a half year)– Japan-Germany joint project approved (2005+2006, CAL + TPC)– Japan-France joint project ?
![Page 15: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
CAL-related talks at LCWS05• From Japan
– H. Miyata: R&D of calorimeter using striplet/cube scintillators with SiPM
– T. Takeshita: Progress of photosensors for scintillator– H. Matsunaga: Simulation study of scintillator-based calorimeter– N. Nakajima: Correlation matrix method for Pb/Scinti sampling ca
lorimeter– T. Takeshita for M. Tanaka: Electronics for scintillator-based calo
rimeter (title to be confirmed)• From Korea
– D.H. Kim: The status of the scintillator-based calorimetry R&D activities in Korea
– S. Nam: CERN beam test of Silicon-Tungsten calorimeter test module
![Page 16: GLD Calorimetry 2005/Mar/03 K. Kawagoe / Kobe-U. Introduction Current design –To be optimized for Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) aiming at 30%/sqrt(E)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f305503460f94c4a99d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Summary• Our default calorimeter design
– ECAL W+Scinti+SiPM, analog readout– HCAL Pb(Fe)+Scinti+SiPM, (semi-)digital readout
• R&D issues– Design optimization– Scinti./SiPM– Readout electronics– Gain monitoring– Mechanical structure
• Schedule– Test beam for ECAL prototype in 2006 ?
• International collaborations growing• Lack of
– Core staffs at KEK– Budget for prototype/test beam