GJCAT_2012_0129

download GJCAT_2012_0129

of 5

description

Log periodic UWB sinuous antenna design

Transcript of GJCAT_2012_0129

  • ISSN: 2249-1945

    Ravi Kishore et al, GJCAT, Vol 2 (1), 2012, 952-956

    952

    1S.Nagarani,

    1Ch.Ravi Kishore,

    1A.Prudhvi Raj

    2T.V.Rama Krishna, 2K.Sarat Kumar, 3M.S.G Prasad, 3B.T.P. Madhav

    1Project Students, Department of ECE, K L University, Guntur DT, AP, India 2Professor and Associate DEAN-R&D, Department of ECE, KL University

    3Associative Professor LCRC-R&D, Department of ECE, K L University, Guntur DT, AP, India

    Abstract: There is lot of demand for ultra high frequency

    broadband antennas in wireless communications due to

    requirements of more bandwidths. Sinuous antenna is a

    type of log- periodic spiral antennas which is having

    spectral efficiency over other patch antennas. Using the

    commercial Ansoft HFSS software 2-petals and 4-petals

    sinuous antennas were designed and simulated. The

    operating frequency range is 4 to 10 GHz. Return loss,

    input impedance, gain, radiation patterns, axial ratio,

    polarization and directivity are simulated and presented in

    this paper.

    Keywords: sinuous, broadband, return loss, polarization.

    1. Introduction

    Log-periodic planar sinuous antennas come

    under the category of frequency independent

    antennas and they are mostly used in the wideband

    applications[1]. The characteristics of logarithmically

    periodic antenna structures repeat periodically with

    the logarithm of frequency. Sinuous antenna is the

    special type of spiral antenna in the microstrip

    antennas which is a low profile antenna that is having

    number of advantages over other antennas. It is light

    weight, inexpensive and electronics like LNAs and SSPAs can be integrated with these antennas quite easily. It can be integrated with circuit elements and

    can be designed for dual or multi frequency

    operations. The usage of wideband antennas are

    increasing due to its extremely fine time and range

    solution even through lossy, opaque media, large

    processing gains, immunity from multipath[1,2].

    Sinuous antenna is having some specific

    characteristics like dual polarization, broadband,

    small size, and low directivity. Sinuous antennas can

    be used in defence industry for sensing purpose, in

    military aircrafts, in RADAR warning receivers, in

    general ESM applications, feed for Square Kilometre

    Array(SKA). Reliable antenna patterns can be

    obtained over the given band by the designed sinuous

    antennas[3].

    2. Antenna Geometry

    The log periodic structure is considered to

    be composed of "cells", with each cell being a scaled

    version of its predecessor. The "cells" of the sinuous

    structure were generated from the sinuous curve

    which is defined by the equation provided by R. H.

    Du Hamel[5].

    Where, p : Angular width of arc(pth cell) c : Number of Cells/Resonators

    r, : Polar coordinates of the curve

    Active resonant Region r = /4(+) Where , in radians 2.1 Design Specifications

    4-Petals Sinuous antenna

    The dimensions of the 4-petal sinuous

    antenna are shown in the Table (1). The proposed

    antenna is simulated between the solution frequencies

    4 to 10 GHz.

    S.no Input parameters Dimensions

    1. Desired frequency range 4.0 to 10.4 GHz

    2. No. of points along arm 200

    3. No. of cells 8

    4. Alpha 45 deg

    5. Growth rate 0.79 cm

    6. Outer radius 1.99 cm

    7. Delta 22.5 deg

    8. No. of petals 4

    9. Port extension Height 0.1 cm

    Table (1) 4-petal sinuous antenna dimensions

  • ISSN: 2249-1945

    Ravi Kishore et al, GJCAT, Vol 2 (1), 2012, 952-956

    953

    2-Petals Sinuous antenna

    The dimensions of the 2-petal sinuous antenna

    are shown in the Table (2). The proposed antenna is

    simulated between the solution frequencies 4 to 10

    GHz.

    S.no Input parameters Dimensions

    1. Desired frequency range 3.95 to 10.15

    GHz

    2. No. of points along arm 200

    3. No. of cells 8

    4. Alpha 45 deg

    5. Growth rate 0.79 cm

    6. Outer radius 1.99 cm

    7. Delta 22.5 deg

    8. No. of petals 2

    9. Port extension Height 0.1 cm

    Table (2) 2-petal sinuous antenna dimensions

    Figures (1) and (2) show 4-petals and 2-petals

    broadband sinuous antennas respectively designed in

    HFSS for the above specifications.

    Figure(1) 4-petals sinuous antenna model

    Figure(2) 2-petals sinuous antenna model

    3. Results and Discussion

    Return loss or VSWR is good when the

    curve has a deep and wide dip, which shows the

    antenna with good bandwidth. If the Return loss is -

    3dB then the antenna absorbs 50% of the signal and

    50% is reflect back. The proposed antennas are

    showing acceptable return loss over the entire range

    in the figures (3) and (4). For 4-petals sinuous

    antenna the return loss of -17.66, - 26.21, -37.20, and

    -25.93dB is obtained at 4.12, 4.35, 5.86 and 7.85

    GHz respectively. For 2-petals sinuous antenna the

    return loss of -14.79, - 30.75 and -29.57dB is

    obtained at 4.81, 6.18 and 8.17 GHz respectively

    4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00Freq [GHz]

    -40.00

    -35.00

    -30.00

    -25.00

    -20.00

    -15.00

    -10.00

    dB

    (S

    t(1

    ,1)

    )

    Ansoft Corporation Sinuous_Antenna_ADKv1Return Loss

    m1

    m2

    m3

    m4

    Curve Info

    dB(St(1,1))

    Setup1 : Sw eep1

    Name X Y

    m1 4.1286 -17.6612

    m2 4.3538 -26.2146

    m3 5.8653 -37.2010

    m4 7.8593 -25.9370

    Figure (3) Return loss for 4-petals

    3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00Freq [GHz]

    -35.00

    -30.00

    -25.00

    -20.00

    -15.00

    -10.00

    -5.00

    0.00

    dB

    (S

    t(

    1,1

    ))

    Ansoft Corporation Sinuous_Antenna_ADKv1Return Loss

    m1

    m2m3

    Curve Info

    dB(St(1,1))

    Setup1 : Sw eep1

    Name X Y

    m1 4.8123 -14.7948

    m2 6.1887 -30.7518

    m3 8.1733 -29.5774

    Figure (4) Return loss for 2-petals

  • ISSN: 2249-1945

    Ravi Kishore et al, GJCAT, Vol 2 (1), 2012, 952-956

    954

    Figures (5) and (6) show the input

    impedance smith chart for the proposed models.

    Maximum power will be transferred if the impedance

    of the antenna is matched to those of the load. Rms of

    0.0907 and bandwidth of 4 is attained from the 4-

    petals sinuous antenna simulated results and rms of

    0.2572 and bandwidth of 3.98 is attained from the 2-

    petals sinuous antenna simulated results.

    5.002.001.000.500.20

    5.00

    -5.00

    2.00

    -2.00

    1.00

    -1.00

    0.50

    -0.50

    0.20

    -0.20

    0.00-0.000

    10

    20

    30

    40

    5060

    708090100

    110120

    130

    140

    150

    160

    170

    180

    -170

    -160

    -150

    -140

    -130-120

    -110-100 -90 -80

    -70-60

    -50

    -40

    -30

    -20

    -10

    Ansoft Corporation Sinuous_Antenna_ADKv1Input Impedance

    Curve Info rms

    St(1,1))

    Setup1 : Sw eep10.0907

    Figure (5) Smith chart for 4-petals

    5.002.001.000.500.20

    5.00

    -5.00

    2.00

    -2.00

    1.00

    -1.00

    0.50

    -0.50

    0.20

    -0.20

    0.00-0.000

    10

    20

    30

    40

    5060

    708090100

    110120

    130

    140

    150

    160

    170

    180

    -170

    -160

    -150

    -140

    -130-120

    -110-100 -90 -80

    -70-60

    -50

    -40

    -30

    -20

    -10

    Ansoft Corporation Sinuous_Antenna_ADKv1Input Impedance

    Curve Info rms

    St(1,1))

    Setup1 : Sw eep10.2572

    Figure (6) Smith chart for 2-petals

    Gain is always related to the main lobe and

    it is expressed in dBi or dBd. Figures (6) and (7)

    show the gain of RHCP 0f 4-petals and 2-petals

    sinuous antennas respectively and figure (8) and (9)

    show gain of LHCP for the same in 3D view.

    Figure (6) Gain RHCP for 4-petals

    Figure (7) Gain RHCP for 2-petals

    Figure (8) Gain LHCP for 4-petals

    Figure (9) Gain LHCP for 2-petals

    The polarization of an antenna is the

    orientation of the electric field (E-plane) of the radio

    wave with respect to the earth surface and is

    determined by the physical structure of the antenna

    and by its orientation. Polarization is the sum of the

    E-plane orientation over time projected on to an

    imaginary plane perpendicular to the direction of

    motion of the radio wave. Figure (10) and (11) show

    the polarization of the 4-petals and 2-petals sinuous

    antennas in RHCP respectively and figure (12) and

    (13) in LHCP.

  • ISSN: 2249-1945

    Ravi Kishore et al, GJCAT, Vol 2 (1), 2012, 952-956

    955

    Figure (10) Polarization RHCP for 4-petals

    Figure (11) Polarization RHCP for 2-petals

    Figure (12) Polarization LHCP for 4-petals

    Figure (13) Polarization LHCP for 2-petals

    The axial ratio describes the electromagnetic

    radiation with elliptical or circular polarization. The

    axial ratio is the ratio of the magnitudes of the major

    and minor axis defined by the electric field vector.

    Figure (14) and (15) show the axial ratio for the 4-

    petals and 2-petals sinuous antennas in 3D.

    Figure (14) Axial ratio for 4-petals

    Figure (15) Axial ratio for 2-petals

    4. Conclusion

    The objective was achieved by designing 4-

    petals and 2-petals broadband sinuous antennas. The

    proposed antennas were simulated and these are

    giving good results for entire wide band. The

    return loss of 4-petal sinuous antenna is better than 2-

    petal sinuous antenna. Remaining parameters almost

    same for both. Parameters of these antennas are

    tabulated below.

    S.no parameter 4-petals

    sinuous

    2-petals

    sinuous

    1. Wide band gain 3.867 dB 3.654dB

    2. Peak gain 4.833 dB 4.567 dB

    3. Peak directivity 4.773 dB 4.522 dB

    4. Radiation

    efficiency

    1.265 1.262

    5. Input impedance 0.0907 rms 0.2572 rms

    Table (3) comparison of two antennas

  • ISSN: 2249-1945

    Ravi Kishore et al, GJCAT, Vol 2 (1), 2012, 952-956

    956

    One of the advantages of these models is cost

    effectiveness.

    5. Acknowledgements

    The authors like to express their thanks to the

    management of K L University and the department of

    ECE for their encouragement and support during this

    work. 6. References [1]. Emily McMilin and Doug Henke, A Low-Cost Directional Log Periodic Log Spiral Antenna, IEEE, 2010. [2]. G. Cortes-Medellin, Novel non planar ultra wide band Quasi Self-Complementary antenna," in Antennas and Propagation

    Society International Symposium, 2007 IEEE, pp. 5733{5736,

    June 2007.

    [3]. V. H. Rumsey, Frequency Independent Antennas. New York:

    Academic Press, 1966.

    [4]. R. Olsson, P.-S. Kildal, and S. Weinreb, The Eleven antenna: a compact low-profile decade bandwidth dual polarized feed for

    reflector antennas," Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions

    on, vol. 54, pp. 368{375, Feb. 2006.

    [5]. M.J. Ammann and Z.N. Chen, Wideband Monopole Antennas for Multi-band Wireless Systems, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 45 (2003), 146150. [6]. R Carrel, The design of the log-periodic dipole antenna, IRE Int. Conv. Rec., 9, pp. 6175, 1961. [7]. P.S. Hall, Multi octave bandwidth log-periodic microstrip antenna array, IEEE Proc., vol.133, Part H, pp127-136, April 1986.

    [8]. Runa kumari and S K Behera, Log Periodic Dielectric Resonator Antenna for Broadband Applications, International Symposium on Devices MEMS, Intelligent Systems &

    Communication (ISDMISC) 2011