Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The...

24
A step towards the improvement of A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications geo-applications The case of OpenStreetMap The case of OpenStreetMap Vyron Antoniou, Muki Haklay, Jeremy Morley Vyron Antoniou, Muki Haklay, Jeremy Morley Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering

Transcript of Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The...

Page 1: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

A step towards the improvement of spatial A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applicationsdata quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications

The case of OpenStreetMapThe case of OpenStreetMap

Vyron Antoniou, Muki Haklay, Jeremy MorleyVyron Antoniou, Muki Haklay, Jeremy MorleyDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering

Page 2: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

A fundamental GIS problemA fundamental GIS problem

Information SystemInformation SystemReal WorldReal World

http://www.bing.com/maps Google Earth

Page 3: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap
Page 4: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

OSM Map FeaturesOSM Map Features

Page 5: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

WikiWiki DemocracyDemocracy++

Page 6: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

OSM DataOSM Data

Geometry

Attributes (Tags)

+

Page 7: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

OSM’s GeometryOSM’s Geometry

Haklay et al.Haklay et al. Antoniou et al.Antoniou et al.

CompletenessCompleteness Positional AccuracyPositional Accuracy

Page 8: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Tags?Tags?

Page 9: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap
Page 10: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Unique Tags vs Total Tags for each OSM Feature Unique Tags vs Total Tags for each OSM Feature Category (GB)Category (GB)

Sum: 2.25M tags

Page 11: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

How many tags do we have for each entity?How many tags do we have for each entity?

Page 12: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Residential (2826)

Primary (623)

How often there is a new Tag introduced?How often there is a new Tag introduced?

Page 13: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

How often there is a new Tag introduced?How often there is a new Tag introduced?

Page 14: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Unique Tags vs Popular Tags (95% of population)Unique Tags vs Popular Tags (95% of population)

Page 15: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

From OSM wiki-pages to XML SchemaFrom OSM wiki-pages to XML Schema

XML SchemaXML Schema

==

OSM OSM SpecificationSpecification

Page 16: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

From OSM wiki-pages to XML SchemaFrom OSM wiki-pages to XML Schema

Page 17: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Data Quality changes whenever there is a change in:Data Quality changes whenever there is a change in:

• The data (e.g. due to a transformation)

• The ground truth

• The specifications of the product

Page 18: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Data Quality changes whenever there is a change in:Data Quality changes whenever there is a change in:

• The data (e.g. due to a transformation)

• The ground truth

• The specifications of the product

Page 19: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

MerkaartorMerkaartor

PotlatchPotlatch

JOSMJOSM

Freedom, Formalization and Quality Standards?Freedom, Formalization and Quality Standards?

Page 20: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Freedom, Formalization and Quality Standards?Freedom, Formalization and Quality Standards?

Page 21: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap
Page 22: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap
Page 23: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

Final PointsFinal Points

•Tags can greatly affect the quality of a VGI Map. •The loose structure of Feature extraction and attribution introduces errors.

• Errors are proportional to the tags’ population.

• The uncontrolled voting system deteriorates the overall quality of the OSM data.

• Errors or discrepancies in Features’ Tags can spread around.

• Formalization can be achieved under the hood.

Page 24: Gisruk2010 - A step towards the improvement of spatial data quality of Web 2.0 geo-applications.The case of OpenStreetMap

ThankThank youyou