Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet...

17
Giant planets around young M-dwarfs Henry Ngo (Caltech) D Mawet, B Bowler, J Wang, O Absil, M Bottom, E Choquet, C Gomez, E Huby, L Hillenbrand, R Jensen-Clem, T Meshkat, M Reggiani, E Serabyn

Transcript of Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet...

Page 1: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Giant planets around young M-dwarfs

Henry Ngo (Caltech)

D Mawet, B Bowler, J Wang, O Absil, M Bottom, E Choquet, C Gomez, E Huby, L Hillenbrand,

R Jensen-Clem, T Meshkat, M Reggiani, E Serabyn

Page 2: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Semimajor axis (AU)

Plan

et M

ass

(MJu

p)

Transit Radial Velocity Microlensing

Direct Imaging

Jupiter

Page 3: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Giant Planet Formation

1) Core formation

2) Hydrostatic growth

3) Runaway accretion

4) Planet contracts

Source of gas is removed

Core reaches ~10 Earth masses

Core mass ≈ envelope mass

(and emits energy we can detect)

Page 4: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Challenges •  Gather enough solids for critical mass •  Reach critical mass before gas dissipates

1) Core formation

2) Hydrostatic growth

3) Runaway accretion

4) Planet contracts

Source of gas is removed

Core reaches ~10 Earth masses

Core mass ≈ envelope mass

Page 5: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Batygin et al. (2016)

Page 6: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Enough solids? Minimum Mass Extrasolar Nebula Chiang & Laughlin (2013) Efficient enough? Compact multi-planet systems Boley et al. (2016) Batygin et al. (2016)

in situ formation

Page 7: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

formation then migration

Enough solids? Increase in solids at ice line Lin et al. (1996) Efficient enough? “Pebble accretion” Lambrechts & Johansen (2012)

Page 8: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Predictions •  in situ formation: additional smaller planets, P < 100 d

•  ice line formation & migration: planet reservoir?

iceline(severalAU)

Young planets Old planets

(observed today)

Page 9: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Predictions •  in situ formation: additional smaller planets, P < 100 d

•  ice line formation & migration: planet reservoir?

iceline(severalAU)

Young planets Old planets

(observed today) Q: Does this ice-line planet reservoir exist?

Page 10: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Finding young planets at the ice lines

•  Target young moving group members

Bowler (2016): Recent efforts to find low-mass members creates large number of potential direct imaging targets

Page 11: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Knowing age is important

Bowler (2016)

Page 12: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Maximize detection ability

Bowler (2016)

Young stars Nearby stars Smaller stars

= better contrast

Page 13: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Detection Probability Sample of 200 late K / M-dwarf (<d> = 40 pc)

L’ vortex on Keck/NIRC2 (IWA = 80 mas)Expected yield (microlensing): 10 planets

Page 14: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Sample star in beta Pic43 pc, 20 Myr, rmag ~9.5

Science image, flattened ADI+PCA processed

(VIP; Gomez Gonzalez et al. 2016)

~ 3”

Page 15: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Sample star in beta Pic43 pc, 20 Myr, rmag ~9.5

5x10-4 contrast @ 0.5”3 MJ @ 22 AU

2x10-3 contrast @ 0.3”6 MJ @ 13 AU

Expect improved contrast down to ~ 0.1” with RDI correction

Page 16: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Progress (since Oct 2015) Schedule

Planned:

4 semesters

Completed: 2 semesters

Next semester (2016B) already

allocated.

Apply for final semester (2017A)

next month

Page 17: Giant planets around young M-dwarfs › ~dmawet › meetings › mdwarfs.pdfJupiter. Giant Planet Formation 1) Core formation 2) Hydrostatic growth 3) Runaway accretion 4) Planet contracts

Summary •  Two hot Jupiter formation models –  in situ: predicts additional small planets with

periods < 100 days – migration: predicts reservoir of young planets

near ice line •  Survey of ~200 M-dwarfs in L-band on

Keck/NIRC2 with vortex to confirm or refute ice line planet reservoir

•  Reggiani/Absil: Southern survey on VLT