Linknrl.northumbria.ac.uk/36501/1/Farokhi, Ghayesh... · Web viewBeing of partial differential...
Transcript of Linknrl.northumbria.ac.uk/36501/1/Farokhi, Ghayesh... · Web viewBeing of partial differential...
Viscoelastic shear deformable microplates: nonlinear forced resonant characteristics
Hamed Farokhi a, Mergen H. Ghayesh b,*
a Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK
b School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Abstract
A viscoelastic model for a shear-deformable microplate is developed in this paper while accounting for geometric nonlinearities. Nonlinear numerical solutions are conducted to examine the resonant oscillations of the microsystem. The geometrically nonlinear theoretical model is developed utilising the Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic model, to account for nonlinear dissipation, the modified version of the couple-stress theory, to account for small-scale characteristics, and the third-order deformation theory, to account for shear stress. The constitutive relations for both the classical and higher-order stress tensors are constructed and are divided into elastic and viscous components. The elastic components are used to develop the potential strain energy and the viscous components are employed to model the virtual work of damping (energy dissipation). Additionally, the microplate motion energy is developed while accounting for all in-plane, out-of-plane, and rotational motions. A distributed harmonic load, as the representative an external force, is applied to the microsystem and the corresponding virtual work is obtained. The generalised Hamilton’s principle is applied to the virtual works and variations of the energy terms, resulting in the nonlinear equations of motion of the microsystem. Being of partial differential type, the equations of motion are discretised into a set of nonlinearly coupled ordinary differential equations consisting of nonlinear geometric and nonlinear damping terms. A solution procedure for the forced oscillation analysis of the microsystem is developed using a continuation method. Different diagrams are constructed to examine the nonlinear resonant characteristics of the viscoelastic shear deformable microplate and to highlight the nonlinear dependency of the Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic damping mechanism on the oscillation amplitude, for a geometrically nonlinear model.
keywords: viscoelastic shear deformable microplates; Kelvin–Voigt model; resonant oscillations; nonlinear damping
1. Introduction
The bending and oscillations of microscale beams and plates are commonly used to measure external parameters in different microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) [1-4] such as microscale sensors, resonators, energy harvesters, and accelerometers [5-16]. It is shown that microresonators display nonlinear energy dissipation and that the internal energy dissipation plays an important role in the forced or free motions of microscale structures. In the presence of geometric nonlinearities, the material damping mechanisms such as Kelvin-Voigt, Zener, and Maxwell, become nonlinearly amplitude-dependent and hence are capable of capturing the damping nonlinearities associated with large-amplitude oscillations. In this paper, Kevin-Voigt material damping is utilised to highlight the effect of damping nonlinearities in the nonlinear forced resonant oscillations of a shear deformable microplate. Furthermore, it has been discovered experimentally [17-19] that when a structure becomes small, the size affects the motion/bending behaviour of the system which is characterised by an additional stiffness in a linear sense. An advanced continuum mechanics theory should be employed to capture the size effects [20, 21]; this paper utilises the modified couple stress (MCS) theory [22-27].
The number of studies on the elastic models of microplates incorporating linear damping mechanism is quite large, which includes both geometrically linear and nonlinear studies. For instance, using the modified strain-gradient theory, Ashoori et al. [28] obtained the linear out-of-plane equation of motion of a microscale plate. Hashemi and Samaei [29] employed the nonlocal Mindlin plate theory to conduct a linear buckling investigation on micro/nonoplates under in-plane forces. Further investigation was conducted by Wang et al. [30], who employed the strain gradient theory in conjunction with the Kirchhoff plate theory, so as to study the linear size-dependent behaviour of microplates. Jomehzadeh et al. [31] conduced a linear vibration analysis on a microplate making use of the MCS theory. The investigations were continued by Nabian et al. [32], who analysed the stability of a functionally graded microplate under electrostatic and hydrostatic pressure. Employing a meshless method together with MCS theory, Roque et al. [33] examined the bending characteristics of a shear deformable microplate. Based on the nonlocal Eringen theory, Farajpour et al. [34] investigated the linear buckling response of a graphene plate. Apart from the linear studies in the literature, there are also several studies of microplates utilising geometrically nonlinear models. For instance, employing the MCS theory, Asghari [35] developed the geometrically nonlinear size-dependent equations of motion of a microplate. Thai and Choi [36] developed size-dependent nonlinear functionally graded Kirchhoff and Mindlin plate models on the basis of the MCS theory.
All the aforementioned valuable studies analysed the linear/nonlinear behaviour of microplates through use of elastic models with linear damping mechanism. The present study analyses for the first time the forced nonlinear resonant oscillations of a shear deformable viscoelastic microplate while accounting for stiffness and damping nonlinearities. The nonlinear equations of motion of the microplate are derived through use of the (i) MCS theory, (ii) the third-order shear deformable plate theory, (iii) the Kelvin–Voigt viscoelastic material damping model, and (iv) generalised Hamilton’s principle. Furthermore, von-Kármán strain-displacement nonlinearities are accounted for, which due to employment of a Kelvin-Voigt material damping model, results in both geometric and damping nonlinearities. Though use of a double-dimensional Galerkin technique and via incorporating basis functions consistent with the fully clamped boundary conditions, the partial differential equations of motion are reduced and transformed into equations of ordinary differential type. Extensive numerical calculations are then conduced employing a continuation technique. The nonlinear resonant characteristics of the viscoelastic shear deformable microplate are examined while highlighting the nonlinear dependency of the damping to oscillation amplitude.
2. Model development for a viscoelastic microplate
A geometrically nonlinear model of the third-order shear deformable microplate is developed in this section taking into account two different damping mechanisms, i.e. the linear viscous damping mechanism and the Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic internal damping mechanism which consists of linear and nonlinear parts due to presence of geometric nonlinearities. The reason for the presence of two damping mechanisms is to be able to compare them in the numerical simulations. The considered microplate is shown in Fig. 1 within a Cartesian coordinate system (x,y,z). The microplate’s dimensions in the x and y directions are denoted by a and b, respectively, while its dimension in the z direction (i.e. thickness) is shown by h. The microplate is under a distributed excitation load of with F1 and being the forcing amplitude and frequency, respectively, and t being time. The employed third-order shear deformation theory contains five independent variables, i.e. three displacements and two rotations. The mid-plane displacement components are denoted by u, v, and w, in the x, y, and z directions, respectively. The rotations of the transverse normal at z=0 are shown by and . Furthermore, the components of the displacement vector are denoted by ux, uy, and uz.
In what follows, the third-order sear deformation theory, the modified couple stress theory, the Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic model, and the generalised Hamilton’s principle are employed to develop a discretised nonlinear model for the microplate.
Taking into account the von Kármán strain nonlinearities, the strain tensor components for a third-order shear deformable microplate can be written as [37]
The symmetric rotation gradient tensor can be formulated as [38]
where the rotation vector can be formulated in terms of the displacement vector u as . Hence, the components of the symmetric rotation gradient tensor can be derived as [37]
Based on the Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic model, the components of the stress tensor () are given by
where and E stand for Poisson’s ratio and Young’s modulus, respectively, and η represents the material viscosity. Additionally, the subscripts (v) and (e) denote viscous and elastic, respectively.
The components of the deviatoric part of the symmetric couple stress tensor (m) can be similarly formulated as
in which l denotes the characteristic length-scale parameter; here again subscripts (v) and (e) denote viscous and elastic, respectively.
The variation of the potential strain energy of the microsystem can be written as
The variation of the microplate kinetic energy is given by
The virtual work of the Kelvin-Voigt (KV) internal damping can be formulated as
The virtual work of the viscous linear damping (LD) mechanism is given by
where c is the linear damping coefficient.
The virtual work of the external distributed dynamic load exerted on the microplate in the z direction is expressed as [10, 39]
Substituting Eqs. 8-12 into generalised Hamilton’s principle and substituting the instances of by and similarly those of by , the equations of motion of the viscoelastic third-order shear deformable microplate can be derived in a compact form, for u, v, w, , and motions, as:
Expanding these equations and writing them in terms of the mid-plane displacements and rotations results in the final equations of motion of the microsystem as
Equations (18)-(22) must be reduced into a set of nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) in order to be able to conduct numerical simulations. A double-dimensional Galerkin technique is utilised to construct the reduced-order model of the viscoelastic third-order shear deformable microplate. First, the mid-plane displacements and rotations are expanded as
where , , , , and represent the time-dependent generalised coordinates to be calculated numerically. and are eigenfunctions for the longitudinal and transverse displacements of a linear doubly-clamped beam. The formulations for ,, and are given by
where , and is the mth root of the characteristic frequency equation of a doubly-clamped beam. Using hyperbolic trial functions, i.e. and , increases the computational costs, but yields more accurate results since they satisfy both geometric and dynamic boundary conditions of a fully clamped microplate. Application of the double-dimensional Galerkin technique yields a set of coupled equations consisting of linear terms as well as quadratic and cubic nonlinear terms. Due to presence of linear, quadratic, and cubic stiffness and damping terms, the discretised equations of motion can be written in a compact matrix form as
in which M is the linear non-diagonal mass matrix and F is the harmonic forcing amplitude vector; additionally, C1, C2, and C3 denote the linear, quadratic, and cubic damping matrices, respectively, while K1, K2, and K3 represent the linear, quadratic, and cubic stiffness matrices, respectively. Furthermore, r is a vector of the generalised coordinates given by
To write the discretised equations in a form suitable for numerical simulations, the discretised set should be decoupled inertially by pre-multiplying both sides of Eq. (25) by M-1 as
The discretised set of equations given in Eq. (27) is then solved numerically using a continuation technique [40, 41]. In this study, a 40-degree-of-freedom (DOF) reduced-order model is constructed by retaining the generalised coordinates u(2,1), u(4,1), u(6,1), u(2,3), u(4,3), u(2,5), u(8,1), u(6,3), u(4,5), u(2,7), u(10,1), v(1,2), v(1,4), v(1,6), v(3,2), v(3,4), v(5,2), v(1,8), v(3,6), v(5,4), v(7,2) and v(1,10) for the in-plane motions, w(1,1), w(3,1), w(5,1), w(1,3), w(3,3), and w(1,5) for the out-of-plane motion, and , , , , , , , , , , , and for the rotational motions.
3. Numerical results
Large-amplitude nonlinear resonant characteristics of the size-dependent viscoelastic shear deformable microplate is studied in this section. The nonlinear resonant response of the microsystem is analysed when the excitation frequency is varied in the vicinity of the fundamental natural frequency associated with linear (1,1) transverse vibration mode. A thorough comparison between different damping mechanisms, i.e. Kelvin-Voigt model and linear viscous damping model, is conducted. The small-scale effects on the large-amplitude oscillation of the microsystem are also highlighted. The numerical simulations are carried out for an aluminium microplate of dimensions h=3 µm ad a=b=200 µm, and mechanical properties of E=69 GPa, ρ=2700 kg/m3, and ν=0.33. The characteristic length-scale parameter for aluminium is calculated as l=1.0653 µm employing the experimental data reported in Ref. [42] as well as the formula suggested in Ref. [43]. The following dimensionless quantities are introduced to the numerical calculations
where and . cd is replaced by 2ζω1,1 with ζ and ω1,1 being the modal damping ratio and the fundamental out-of-plane dimensionless natural frequency.
Figure 2 illustrates the frequency-amplitude diagrams of the shear deformable viscoelastic microplate; ηd=0.00025, f1=35.0, and cd=0. For this case, the fundamental out-of-plane dimensionless natural frequency is calculated as ω1,1 = 44.1065. Sub-figures (a-d) show the generalised coordinates of the out-of-plane motion, while sub-figures (e) and (f) show the fundamental in-plane and rotational generalised coordinates, respectively. It should be noted that due to equal in-plane dimensions of the microplate, the frequency-amplitude diagrams of v(1,2) and are the same as those of u(2,1) and , respectively. As seen, the microsystem shows nonlinear resonant response of hardening type, originating from the nonlinear in-plane tension induced due to mid-plane stretching. The viscoelastic shear deformable microplate undergoes two jumps at points SN1 (Ωe/ω1,1= 1.2150) and SN2 (Ωe/ω1,1= 1.0561), characterised by saddle-node bifurcations. The dashed line between the two saddle-node bifurcations indicates that the solution is unstable.
A comparison between the two damping mechanisms, i.e. the viscoelastic nonlinear damping (i.e. nonlinearly amplitude-dependent) and the linear damping, at different forcing amplitudes is shown in Fig. 3. It should be noted that the presence of geometric nonlinearities in the strain-displacement relation renders the Kelvin-Voigt model a geometrically nonlinear damping mechanism. Furthermore, for the model with viscoelastic nonlinear damping ζ is set to zero while for the model with linear damping ηd is set to zero. In order to be able to compare the two damping mechanisms, first a value should be selected for the linear damping coefficient. To do so, the frequency-amplitude diagrams for both viscoelastic nonlinear damping and linear damping models are plotted for a small forcing amplitude (here f1=4.0), for which the effect of nonlinear terms is negligible, and the value of ζ is chosen such that both curves coincide. Based on the dimensionless material viscosity of ηd=0.00025, ζ is obtained as 0.0055. Having set the damping coefficients to fixed values, the forcing amplitude is increased to 14.0 and the frequency-amplitude curves are constructed for both models. As seen in the figure, the model with the linear damping mechanism predicts a larger peak amplitude of oscillation compared to the one consisting a viscoelastic nonlinear damping mechanism. The difference between the two models increases even further as the forcing amplitude is set to f1=28.0. This is due to the fact that at larger oscillation amplitudes, the geometrically nonlinear damping terms become larger which in turn increases the amount of energy dissipation and hence results in a smaller peak amplitude of oscillations.
In order to better illustrate the differences between the viscoelastic nonlinear damping mechanism and the linear damping one, the frequency-amplitude diagrams are obtained for the two models when f1=1.0, 2.0, …, 30. Afterwards, at each forcing amplitude, the nonlinear resonant frequency and amplitude at drop point are extracted for both models; for convenience, the nonlinear resonant frequency and amplitude at drop point are referred to as drop frequency and drop amplitude. Figures 4 and 5 are then constructed by plotting the forcing amplitude versus the drop frequency and drop amplitude, respectively. Figure 4 shows the forcing amplitude versus the drop frequency for the two models; as seen in Fig. 4, both models, i.e. the one with the viscoelastic nonlinear damping mechanism and the one including a linear damping mechanism, predict almost the same drop frequency for small forcing amplitudes up to f1≈5.0; however, as the forcing amplitude is increased to larger values, the drop frequency predicted by the model with linear damping mechanism starts to deviate from that predicted by the model with viscoelastic nonlinear damping mechanism. Hence, Fig. 4 shows clearly that the geometric nonlinearities associated with damping become more significant at larger forcing amplitudes and large-amplitude oscillations; therefore, the damping nonlinearities should be accounted for when the microsystem undergoes large-amplitude vibrations.
Figure 5 demonstrates the variation of the drop amplitude as a function of the forcing amplitude for the two damping models through plots of generalised coordinates w(1,1), w(3,1), w(3,3), and w(5,1). At first glance, it is seen that as the forcing amplitude is increased, the difference between the drop amplitude predicted by the two models, i.e. one consisting of a viscoelastic nonlinear damping mechanism and the other including a linear damping model, increases accordingly. It is interesting to note that for the model with linear damping, the drop amplitudes of w(1,1) and w(3,1) do not change much at large forcing amplitudes, i.e. near 30; however, a different scenario is observed for w(3,3) and w(5,1) generalised coordinates whose drop amplitudes increases sharply at large forcing amplitudes. This behaviour is due to presence of modal interactions and internal resonances [44, 45] where the energy is transferred between modes of vibration.
A comparison between the nonlinear primary resonant responses of the viscoelastic shear deformable microplate obtained via the MCS and classical continuum theories is depicted in Fig. 6. For both models, ηd=0.00025, f1=35.0, and cd=0. It should be mentioned that when the characteristic material length-scale parameter is set to zero, the model developed in Section 2 based on the MCS theory reduces to a model based on the classical continuum theory. As seen in Fig. 6, both models predict a geometrically hardening-type nonlinear behaviour with similar magnitude of oscillations in the primary out-of-plane and rotational vibration modes; for higher out-of-plane modes as well as the in-plane modes, the MCS theory predicts smaller magnitude of oscillation. Furthermore, it is seen that when the characteristic length-scale parameter is accounted for, i.e. when the MCS theory is employed, the primary resonant region is clearly shifted to larger values of Ωe, signalling an increase in the fundamental natural frequency of the microsystem.
4. Conclusions
The nonlinear small-scale-dependent resonant vibration characteristic of a third-order shear deformable viscoelastic microplate has been investigated numerically while highlighting the nonlinear dependency of the damping to amplitude. To this end, the MCS theory is employed together with the third-order shear deformable plate theory as well as the Kelvin–Voigt viscoelastic damping model to derive the coupled nonlinear equations governing the in-plane, out-of-plane, and rotational motions of the microplate. The presence of von-Kármán strain-displacement nonlinearities renders the Kelvin-Voigt model a geometrically nonlinear damping model. The developed nonlinear continuum model is reduced to a set of discretised equations with the aid of a double-dimensional Galerkin technique, utilising trial functions consistent with the fully clamped boundary conditions of the microplate. The nonlinear resonant behaviour of the viscoelastic shear deformable microplate is investigated numerically via a continuation technique. It was shown that the induced mid-plane tension due to large-amplitude oscillations results in a hardening-type nonlinear behaviour. A comparison between microplate models consisting of viscoelastic damping and linear damping showed that at small forcing levels, both models predict similar resonant response with similar peak oscillation amplitudes; however, as the oscillation amplitude increases (as a result of increased forcing amplitude) the difference between the drop frequencies and drop amplitudes of the two models starts to manifest itself due to the strong dependency of the damping in the viscoelastic model to oscillation amplitude. More specifically, as the forcing amplitude is increased, the model consisting of viscoelastic nonlinear damping mechanism predicts smaller drop frequency and drop amplitude in comparison to the model including linear damping.
Appendix A
In the present study, 40 generalised coordinates are retained in the discretised model of the viscoelastic shear deformable microplate to ensure reliable results. A convergence analysis is conducted in this section by comparing the frequency-amplitude diagram of w(1,1) obtained based on the 40-DOF model to that of obtained using 5-DOF, 13-DOF, and 24-DOF models of the microsystem. The retained generalised coordinates are: u(2,1), v(1,2), w(1,1), , and for the 5-DOF model, u(2,1), u(4,1), v(1,2), v(1,4), w(1,1), w(3,1), w(1,3), , , , , , and for the 13-DOF model, and u(2,1), u(4,1), u(6,1), u(2,3), u(4,3), u(2,5), v(1,2), v(1,4), v(1,6), v(3,2), v(3,4), v(5,2), w(1,1), w(3,1), w(1,3), w(3,3), , , , , , , , and for the 24-DOF model. As seen in Fig. 7, the 5-DOF and 13-DOF discretised models do not predict converged results. Going from 24-DOF to 40-DOF results in only slight change in drop frequency and amplitude, indicating that the 40-DOF model employed in this study gives accurate results.
References
[1] T.H. Hanley, B.J. Gallacher, H.T.D. Grigg, On the exploitation of mode localization in surface acoustic wave MEMS, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 89 (2017) 27-36.
[2] A.B. Sabater, J.F. Rhoads, Parametric system identification of resonant micro/nanosystems operating in a nonlinear response regime, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 84, Part B (2017) 241-264.
[3] H. Madinei, H.H. Khodaparast, S. Adhikari, M.I. Friswell, Design of MEMS piezoelectric harvesters with electrostatically adjustable resonance frequency, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 81 (2016) 360-374.
[4] G. Zhang, J. Ding, W. Xu, Y. Liu, R. Wang, J. Han, B. Bai, C. Xue, J. Liu, W. Zhang, Design and optimization of stress centralized MEMS vector hydrophone with high sensitivity at low frequency, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 104 (2018) 607-618.
[5] R.A. Rojas, A. Carcaterra, An approach to optimal semi-active control of vibration energy harvesting based on MEMS, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 107 (2018) 291-316.
[6] Y. Wei, Y. Dong, X. Huang, Z. Zhang, Nonlinearity measurement for low-pressure encapsulated MEMS gyroscopes by transient response, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 100 (2018) 534-549.
[7] I. Sari, T. Balkan, H. Kulah, An electromagnetic micro power generator for low-frequency environmental vibrations based on the frequency upconversion technique, Microelectromechanical Systems, Journal of, 19 (2010) 14-27.
[8] J.S. Go, Y.-H. Cho, B.M. Kwak, K. Park, Snapping microswitches with adjustable acceleration threshold, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 54 (1996) 579-583.
[9] W.H. Lin, Y.P. Zhao, Casimir effect on the pull-in parameters of nanometer switches, Microsystem Technologies, 11 (2005) 80-85.
[10] H. Farokhi, M.H. Ghayesh, Nonlinear dynamical behaviour of geometrically imperfect microplates based on modified couple stress theory, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 90 (2015) 133-144.
[11] G. Feng, N. Hu, Z. Mones, F. Gu, A.D. Ball, An investigation of the orthogonal outputs from an on-rotor MEMS accelerometer for reciprocating compressor condition monitoring, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 76–77 (2016) 228-241.
[12] S. Chong, S. Rui, L. Jie, Z. Xiaoming, T. Jun, S. Yunbo, L. Jun, C. Huiliang, Temperature drift modeling of MEMS gyroscope based on genetic-Elman neural network, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 72–73 (2016) 897-905.
[13] H. Shi, S. Fan, W. Xing, J. Sun, Study of weak vibrating signal detection based on chaotic oscillator in MEMS resonant beam sensor, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 50–51 (2015) 535-547.
[14] A. Martowicz, T. Uhl, Reliability- and performance-based robust design optimization of MEMS structures considering technological uncertainties, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 32 (2012) 44-58.
[15] G. De Pasquale, A. Somà, Dynamic identification of electrostatically actuated MEMS in the frequency domain, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24 (2010) 1621-1633.
[16] R.M. Lin, W.J. Wang, Structural dynamics of microsystems—current state of research and future directions, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20 (2006) 1015-1043.
[17] D.C.C. Lam, F. Yang, A.C.M. Chong, J. Wang, P. Tong, Experiments and theory in strain gradient elasticity, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 51 (2003) 1477-1508.
[18] A.W. McFarland, J.S. Colton, Role of material microstructure in plate stiffness with relevance to microcantilever sensors, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 15 (2005) 1060.
[19] N.A. Fleck, G.M. Muller, M.F. Ashby, J.W. Hutchinson, Strain gradient plasticity: Theory and experiment, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia, 42 (1994) 475-487.
[20] H. Farokhi, M.H. Ghayesh, Nonlinear mechanics of electrically actuated microplates, International Journal of Engineering Science, 123 (2018) 197-213.
[21] C. Chen, J. Yuan, Y. Mao, Post-buckling of size-dependent micro-plate considering damage effects, Nonlinear Dynamics, 90 (2017) 1301-1314.
[22] M.H. Ghayesh, M. Amabili, H. Farokhi, Three-dimensional nonlinear size-dependent behaviour of Timoshenko microbeams, International Journal of Engineering Science, 71 (2013) 1-14.
[23] M.H. Ghayesh, H. Farokhi, M. Amabili, Nonlinear dynamics of a microscale beam based on the modified couple stress theory, Composites Part B: Engineering, 50 (2013) 318-324.
[24] H. Farokhi, M.H. Ghayesh, M. Amabili, Nonlinear dynamics of a geometrically imperfect microbeam based on the modified couple stress theory, International Journal of Engineering Science, 68 (2013) 11-23.
[25] M.H. Ghayesh, Dynamics of functionally graded viscoelastic microbeams, International Journal of Engineering Science, 124 (2018) 115-131.
[26] M.H. Ghayesh, H. Farokhi, M. Amabili, Nonlinear behaviour of electrically actuated MEMS resonators, International Journal of Engineering Science, 71 (2013) 137-155.
[27] H. Farokhi, M.H. Ghayesh, Thermo-mechanical dynamics of perfect and imperfect Timoshenko microbeams, International Journal of Engineering Science, 91 (2015) 12-33.
[28] A. Ashoori Movassagh, M.J. Mahmoodi, A micro-scale modeling of Kirchhoff plate based on modified strain-gradient elasticity theory, European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 40 (2013) 50-59.
[29] S.H. Hashemi, A.T. Samaei, Buckling analysis of micro/nanoscale plates via nonlocal elasticity theory, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 43 (2011) 1400-1404.
[30] B. Wang, S. Zhou, J. Zhao, X. Chen, A size-dependent Kirchhoff micro-plate model based on strain gradient elasticity theory, European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 30 (2011) 517-524.
[31] E. Jomehzadeh, H.R. Noori, A.R. Saidi, The size-dependent vibration analysis of micro-plates based on a modified couple stress theory, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 43 (2011) 877-883.
[32] A. Nabian, G. Rezazadeh, M. Almassi, A.-M. Borgheei, On the stability of a functionally graded rectangular micro-plate subjected to hydrostatic and nonlinear electrostatic pressures, Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 26 (2013) 205-220.
[33] C.M.C. Roque, A.J.M. Ferreira, J.N. Reddy, Analysis of Mindlin micro plates with a modified couple stress theory and a meshless method, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37 (2013) 4626-4633.
[34] A. Farajpour, A.R. Shahidi, M. Mohammadi, M. Mahzoon, Buckling of orthotropic micro/nanoscale plates under linearly varying in-plane load via nonlocal continuum mechanics, Composite Structures, 94 (2012) 1605-1615.
[35] M. Asghari, Geometrically nonlinear micro-plate formulation based on the modified couple stress theory, International Journal of Engineering Science, 51 (2012) 292-309.
[36] H.-T. Thai, D.-H. Choi, Size-dependent functionally graded Kirchhoff and Mindlin plate models based on a modified couple stress theory, Composite Structures, 95 (2013) 142-153.
[37] J.N. Reddy, J. Kim, A nonlinear modified couple stress-based third-order theory of functionally graded plates, Composite Structures, 94 (2012) 1128-1143.
[38] F. Yang, A.C.M. Chong, D.C.C. Lam, P. Tong, Couple stress based strain gradient theory for elasticity, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 39 (2002) 2731-2743.
[39] M.H. Ghayesh, H. Farokhi, Nonlinear dynamics of microplates, International Journal of Engineering Science, 86 (2015) 60-73.
[40] H.D. Mittelmann, A pseudo-arclength continuation method for nonlinear eigenvalue problems, SIAM journal on numerical analysis, 23 (1986) 1007-1016.
[41] E.L. Allgower, K. Georg, Introduction to Numerical Continuation Methods, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2003.
[42] M.A. Haque, M.T.A. Saif, Strain gradient effect in nanoscale thin films, Acta Materialia, 51 (2003) 3053-3061.
[43] S.H. Chen, B. Feng, Size effect in micro-scale cantilever beam bending, Acta Mechanica, 219 (2011) 291-307.
[44] M.H. Ghayesh, H. Farokhi, M. Amabili, In-plane and out-of-plane motion characteristics of microbeams with modal interactions, Composites Part B: Engineering, 60 (2014) 423-439.
[45] A. Gholipour, H. Farokhi, M.H. Ghayesh, In-plane and out-of-plane nonlinear size-dependent dynamics of microplates, Nonlinear Dynamics, 79 (2015) 1771-1785.
(a)
(b)
Figure 1: (a) Schematic representation of a viscoelastic shear deformable microplate under distributed load; (b) deformed configuration of the microplate.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Figure 2: Nonlinear frequency-amplitude diagrams of the shear deformable viscoelastic microplate: (a-d) the maximum amplitudes of w(1,1), w(3,1), w(3,3), and w(5,1), respectively; (e) the minimum amplitude of u(2,1); (f) the maximum amplitude of φ1 (1,1).
(a)
(b)
Figure 3: Nonlinear frequency-amplitude diagrams of the shear deformable microplate obtained employing linear and nonlinear damping mechanisms: (a,b) the maximum amplitudes of w(1,1) and w(3,1), respectively.
Figure 4: Forcing amplitude versus the drop frequency obtained employing linear and nonlinear damping mechanisms.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 5: Forcing amplitude versus the drop amplitude obtained employing linear and nonlinear damping mechanisms: (a-d) the drop amplitudes of w(1,1), w(3,1), w(3,3), and w(5,1), respectively.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 6: Nonlinear frequency-amplitude diagrams of the shear deformable microplate obtained employing the MCS and classical theories: (a,b) the maximum amplitudes of w(1,1) and w(3,1), respectively; (c) the minimum amplitude of u(2,1); (d) the maximum amplitude of φ1 (1,1).
Fig. 7. Nonlinear resonant response of the viscoelastic shear deformable microplate based on different discretised models. Thick and thin lines show stable and unstable solutions, respectively.
1
w
F
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
sin
coshcossinhsin,
sinhsincoshcos,
m
mmmmmm
mmmmmm
xamxa
xaxaxaxaxa
xaxaxaxaxa
p
bbabb
bbabb
Y=
C=---
éùéù
ëûëû
F=+--
éùéù
ëûëû
coshcos
sinhsin
mm
m
mm
bb
a
bb
æö
-
=
ç÷
-
èø
m
b
13
++()+()++()+()=cos(),
t
w
MrCrCrrCr,rrKrKrrKr,rrF
&&&&&
2123
{
}
T
(,)(,)(,)1(,)2(,)
(),(),(),(),(),
mnmnmnmnmn
utvtwttt
ff
=
r
1111111
13
++()+()++()+()=cos(),
t
w
-------
rMCrMCrrMCr,rrMKrMKrrMKr,rrMF
&&&&&
2123
1(1,1)
f
1(3,1)
f
1
f
1(5,1)
f
1(1,3)
f
1(3,3)
f
1(1,5)
f
2(1,1)
f
2(3,1)
f
2(5,1)
f
2(1,3)
f
2(3,3)
f
2(1,5)
f
2
f
4
4
*
1
1,11,11
ˆ
,,,,,,
edd
Fa
tca
tfc
DhD
h
wtwwth
ttt
=W=====
(
)
(
)
32
121
DhE
n
=-
4
ahD
tr
=
2(1,1)
f
1(1,1)
f
2
1
2
3
2
2
12
1
2
14
23
11
1
22
2
xx
yy
xy
w
u
x
x
x
vwz
z
yyyh
uv
ww
yxyx
xy
f
e
f
e
ff
e
ìü
¶
æö
ìüìü
¶
¶
ìü
ïï
ç÷
ïïïï
¶
èø
ïï
ïï
¶
¶
ïïïï
ïï
ïï
ïïïï
¶
¶¶
æö
ïïïïïïïï
=++-
íýíýíýíý
ç÷
¶¶¶
èø
ïïïïïïïï
ïïïïïïïï
¶¶
¶¶
æöæö
¶¶
æö
++
ïïïïïïïï
ç÷ç÷
ç÷
îþ
¶¶¶¶
¶¶
ïïïï
èøèø
ïï
îþèøîþ
îþ
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
12
,
1
2
2
w
xx
w
yy
w
yxxy
f
f
ff
ìü
¶
¶
ïï
+
¶¶
ïï
ïï
¶
¶
ïï
+
íý
¶¶
ïï
ïï
æö
¶¶
¶
++
ïï
ç÷
¶¶¶¶
ïï
èø
îþ
z x y a b h u w v F1 cos(ωt)
∂w/∂x (u,w) (ux, uz) x z
W
e
/
w
1
,
1
w
(
1
,
1
)
/
h
0
.
9
1
1
.
1
1
.
2
1
.
3
0
0
.
1
0
.
2
0
.
3
0
.
4
0
.
5
0
.
6
S
N
1
S
N
2
W
e
/
w
1
,
1
w
(
3
,
1
)
/
h
0
.
9
1
1
.
1
1
.
2
1
.
3
0
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
4
W
e
/
w
1
,
1
w
(
3
,
3
)
/
h
0
.
9
1
1
.
1
1
.
2
1
.
3
0
0
.
0
0
1
0
.
0
0
2
0
.
0
0
3
0
.
0
0
4
0
.
0
0
5
W
e
/
w
1
,
1
w
(
5
,
1
)
/
h
0
.
9
1
1
.
1
1
.
2
1
.
3
0
0
.
0
0
1
0
.
0
0
2
0
.
0
0
3
W
e
/
w
1
,
1
u
(
2
,
1
)
/
h
0
.
9
1
1
.
1
1
.
2
1
.
3
-
0
.
0
0
3
-
0
.
0
0
2
-
0
.
0
0
1
0
W
e
/
w
1
,
1
f
1
(
1
,
1
)
0
.
9
1
1
.
1
1
.
2
1
.
3
0
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
4
0
.
0
5
W
e
/
w
1
,
1
w
(
1
,
1
)
/
h
0
.
9
1
1
.
1
1
.
2
1
.
3
0
0
.
1
0
.
2
0
.
3
0
.
4
0
.
5
0
.
6
0
.
7
L
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
V
i
s
c
o
e
l
a
s
t
i
c
n
o
n
l
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
f
1
=
4
.
0
f
1
=
2
8
.
0
f
1
=
1
4
.
0
W
e
/
w
1
,
1
w
(
3
,
1
)
/
h
0
.
9
1
1
.
1
1
.
2
1
.
3
0
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
4
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
6
L
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
V
i
s
c
o
e
l
a
s
t
i
c
n
o
n
l
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
f
1
=
4
.
0
f
1
=
2
8
.
0
f
1
=
1
4
.
0
W
d
r
o
p
/
w
1
,
1
f
1
1
1
.
0
5
1
.
1
1
.
1
5
1
.
2
1
.
2
5
0
5
1
0
1
5
2
0
2
5
3
0
L
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
V
i
s
c
o
e
l
a
s
t
i
c
n
o
n
l
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
w
(
1
,
1
)
d
r
o
p
/
h
f
1
0
0
.
1
0
.
2
0
.
3
0
.
4
0
.
5
0
.
6
0
.
7
0
5
1
0
1
5
2
0
2
5
3
0
L
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
V
i
s
c
o
e
l
a
s
t
i
c
n
o
n
l
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
w
(
3
,
1
)
d
r
o
p
/
h
f
1
0
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
4
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
6
0
5
1
0
1
5
2
0
2
5
3
0
L
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
V
i
s
c
o
e
l
a
s
t
i
c
n
o
n
l
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
w
(
3
,
3
)
d
r
o
p
/
h
f
1
0
0
.
0
0
5
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
1
5
0
.
0
2
0
.
0
2
5
0
.
0
3
0
5
1
0
1
5
2
0
2
5
3
0
L
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
V
i
s
c
o
e
l
a
s
t
i
c
n
o
n
l
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
1
2
2
2
14
1.
2
xz
yz
w
z
x
w
h
y
e
f
f
e
¶
ìü
ìü
+
ïï
æö
¶
ïïïï
=-
íýíý
ç÷
¶
èø
ïïïï
+
îþ
¶
ïï
îþ
w
(
5
,
1
)
d
r
o
p
/
h
f
1
0
0
.
0
0
5
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
1
5
0
.
0
2
0
5
1
0
1
5
2
0
2
5
3
0
L
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
V
i
s
c
o
e
l
a
s
t
i
c
n
o
n
l
i
n
e
a
r
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
W
e
w
(
1
,
1
)
/
h
3
0
3
5
4
0
4
5
5
0
5
5
0
0
.
1
0
.
2
0
.
3
0
.
4
0
.
5
0
.
6
C
l
a
s
s
i
c
a
l
t
h
e
o
r
y
M
C
S
t
h
e
o
r
y
W
e
w
(
3
,
1
)
/
h
3
0
3
5
4
0
4
5
5
0
5
5
0
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
4
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
6
0
.
0
7
C
l
a
s
s
i
c
a
l
t
h
e
o
r
y
M
C
S
t
h
e
o
r
y
W
e
u
(
2
,
1
)
/
h
3
0
3
5
4
0
4
5
5
0
5
5
-
0
.
0
0
5
-
0
.
0
0
4
-
0
.
0
0
3
-
0
.
0
0
2
-
0
.
0
0
1
0
C
l
a
s
s
i
c
a
l
t
h
e
o
r
y
M
C
S
t
h
e
o
r
y
W
e
f
1
(
1
,
1
)
3
0
3
5
4
0
4
5
5
0
5
5
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
2
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
4
C
l
a
s
s
i
c
a
l
t
h
e
o
r
y
M
C
S
t
h
e
o
r
y
W
e
/
w
1
,
1
w
(
1
,
1
)
/
h
0
.
9
1
1
.
1
1
.
2
1
.
3
1
.
4
0
0
.
1
0
.
2
0
.
3
0
.
4
0
.
5
0
.
6
0
.
7
4
0
-
D
O
F
2
4
-
D
O
F
1
3
-
D
O
F
5
-
D
O
F
c
(
)
T
11
22
11
,
222
11
22
y
xxxz
yyy
xz
y
xzzz
xyxzx
yxyzy
zxzyz
q
qqqq
qqq
q
qqqq
é¶ù
æö
¶¶¶¶
æö
++
êú
ç÷
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶
èø
èø
êú
êú
¶¶¶
Ñ+Ñ
æöæö
¶¶
êú
=++
ç÷ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶
êú
èøèø
êú
¶
æö
¶¶¶¶
æö
êú
++
ç÷
ç÷
êú
¶¶¶¶¶
èø
èø
ëû
c=
1
2
=´
u
qÑ
22
22
22
11
2
2
2121
2222
1212
222
1
2
2
11
22
xx
yy
zz
xy
ww
xyxxxy
ww
yxyyxy
z
h
xyxy
www
yxxyxxy
ff
c
ff
c
ffff
c
ffff
c
ìü
¶¶
¶¶
ìü
---
ïï
¶¶¶¶¶¶
ïï
ïï
ïï
ïï
¶¶
¶¶
ïï
-+
ïï
¶¶¶¶¶¶
ïï
ïï
=-
íýíý
¶¶¶¶
ïïïï
--
ïïïï
¶¶¶¶
ïïïï
æö
¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶
ïïïï
-+-+--
ç÷
îþ
ïï
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
îþ
2
,
w
y
ìü
ïï
ïï
ïï
ïï
ïï
íý
ïï
ïï
ïï
æö
ïï
ç÷
ïï
¶
èø
îþ
22
22
22
12
12
2
22
22
3
2
2222
22
12
12
2
2
1
22
12
4
1
43
12
4
xz
yz
w
vu
xyxhy
xxyxyx
z
z
h
vu
w
xyy
yxy
yxyhx
ff
ff
f
c
ff
ff
c
f
ìü
æö
¶¶
¶
æö
ì
ìü
¶¶
¶¶
--+
ìü
--
ïï
ç÷
ç÷
ï
ïï
¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ïïïïïï
èø
=-+
íýíýíýí
¶¶¶¶
æö
¶¶
¶
æö
ïïïïïï
-
-
-++
ç÷
ç÷
îþ
ïïïï
¶¶¶
¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶
îþ
èø
èø
îþ
.
ü
ï
ïï
ý
ïï
ïï
îþ
s
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
xx
xxxxyyyy
yy
yyyyxxxx
xyxyxy
xzxz
xz
yzyz
yz
EE
tt
EE
tt
E
t
E
t
E
t
s
ehenehe
n
s
ehenehe
n
sehe
n
ehe
s
n
ehe
s
n
ì
鶶ù
æö
ìü
+++
ç÷
êú
-¶¶
èø
ïï
ëû
ïï
鶶ù
æö
ïï
+++
ç÷
êú
ïï
-¶¶
èø
ëû
ïï
¶
ïï
æö
=+
íýí
ç÷
+¶
èø
ïï
ïï
¶
æö
+
ïï
ç÷
+¶
èø
ïï
ïï
¶
æö
+
ïï
ç÷
îþ
+¶
èø
()()
()()
()()
()()
()()
,
xxexxv
yyeyyv
xyexyv
xzexzv
yzeyzv
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ü
ìü
+
ïï
ïï
ïï
ïï
ïï
ïï
+
ïï
ïï
ïï
ïï
ïï
ïïïï
=+
ýíý
ïïïï
ïïïï
ïïïï
+
ïïïï
ïïïï
ïïïï
+
îþ
ïï
îþ
n
2
()()
,
1
ijijijijeijv
mEmm
t
chc
n
¶
æö
=+=+
ç÷
+¶
èø
l
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
}
2
()()()()()
002
()()()
()()()
2
2ddd.
h
ab
xxexxyyeyyxyexyxzexzyzeyz
h
xxexxyyeyyzzezz
xyexyxzexzyzeyz
mmm
mmmzxy
dPsdesdesdesdesde
dcdcdc
dcdcdc
-
ì
ï
é
=++++
í
ë
ï
î
+++
ù
+++
û
òòò
22
3
1122
00
2222
12
174174
315315315315
1414
dd
252315252315
ab
ww
Kh
txtttytt
wwww
yx
xttxtyttyt
u
h
t
ffff
drdd
ff
dd
rd
ì
æöæö
¶¶¶¶
¶¶
ï
æöæö
=-+-
í
ç÷ç÷
ç÷ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èøèø
ï
èøèø
î
ü
æöæöæöæö
¶¶
¶¶¶¶
ï
+-+-
ý
ç÷ç÷ç÷ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
ï
èøèøèøèø
þ
¶¶
+
¶
òò
00
dd.
ab
uvvww
yx
ttttt
dd
鶶¶¶ù
æöæöæö
++
ç÷ç÷ç÷
êú
¶¶¶¶¶
èøèøèø
ëû
òò
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
}
2
()()()()()
002
()()()
()()()
2
2ddd.
h
ab
KVxxvxxyyvyyxyvxyxzvxzyzvyz
h
xxvxxyyvyyzzvzz
xyvxyxzvxzyzvyz
W
mmm
mmmzxy
dsdesdesdesdesde
dcdcdc
dcdcdc
-
ì
ï
é
=-++++
í
ë
ï
î
+++
ù
+++
û
òòò
22
2
12
12
00
22
12
174174
315315315315
1414
dd
252315252315
L
b
D
a
ww
Wch
txttyt
wwww
yx
xttxytty
uvw
cuv
tt
ff
ddfdf
ff
dd
dd
ì
æöæö
¶¶
¶¶
ï
=-+-
í
ç÷ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶
ï
èøèø
î
ü
æöæö
¶¶
¶¶¶¶
æö
ï
æö
+-+-
ý
ç÷ç÷
ç÷
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ï
èø
èøèø
þ
¶¶¶
æöæö
+++
ç÷ç÷
¶¶¶
èøèø
òò
00
dd,
ab
wyx
t
d
éù
æö
ç÷
êú
èø
ëû
òò
(
)
1
00
cos()dd.
ab
Ex
WwFtyx
ddw
=
òò
()()
ijeijv
ss
+
ij
s
()()
ijeijv
mm
+
ij
m
1
f
2
f
2222
2
2
2
22
2222
11
dddd0,
22
hhhh
xyyz
xxxz
hhhh
m
m
uu
hczzzz
ttxyxyy
s
s
r
----
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
+----=
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
òòòò
2222
2
2
2
22
2222
11
dddd0,
22
hhhh
xyyyyz
xz
hhhh
m
m
vv
hczzzz
ttxyxyx
ss
r
----
¶¶¶
¶
¶¶
+--++=
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
òòòò
33
244
3
12
2222222
22
33
2
12
22
222
222
1144
252252315315
1144
252252315315
44
1
yz
xz
xyxx
www
hh
txtytxtyt
www
cch
txtytxtyt
m
wzzww
xyhxhxxx
ff
rr
ff
s
ss
æö
¶¶
¶¶¶
+--++
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
æö
¶¶
¶¶¶
++--++
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
¶
æö
¶¶
¶¶¶
--+-++
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
2
2
2
222
222
2
2
22
2
2323
222222
2
d
44
1d
144144
1d1
2323
h
xy
xx
h
h
yzxyyy
xz
xyyy
h
h
xyxy
xx
h
w
z
xyx
m
wzzwww
z
xyhyhyxyyyy
mm
zzzz
z
hxhxhy
s
s
sss
ss
s
-
-
-
æö
¶
¶
+
ç÷
¶¶¶
èø
æö
¶¶¶
æö
¶
¶¶¶¶
-++-+++
ç÷
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
èø
éù
¶¶
æöæö
¶
-++++-
êú
ç÷ç÷
¶¶¶
èøèø
ëû
ò
ò
ò
2
2
22
2
2
22
2
23
1
22
2
d
148
1dcos()0,
23
h
yy
h
h
yyxy
xx
h
z
hy
m
m
zz
zFt
hxyxyhxy
s
s
w
-
-
éù
êú
êú
ë
éù
¶
êú
¶
ëû
æö
¶¶
æö
¶
-+---=
ç÷
ç÷
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
èø
û
ò
ò
2
32
32
11
22
22
2
323
222
22
23
2
174174
315315315315
14144
d1d
2323
144
1
23
hh
xy
xzxx
hh
yy
zz
ww
hch
txttxt
m
m
zzz
zzzz
hxyhxhx
m
m
zz
z
hyyh
ff
r
s
--
æöæö
¶¶
¶¶
-+-
ç÷ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶
èøèø
¶
æöæöæö
¶¶
----+-
ç÷ç÷ç÷
¶¶¶¶
èøèøèø
¶
æö
æö
¶
---+-
ç÷
ç÷
¶¶
èø
éù
ê
ø
ú
ëû
è
òò
2
2
2
22
2
23
2222
22
d
4414
1dd0,
23
h
xy
h
hh
yz
xzyz
hh
z
y
m
zzz
mzzz
hhhy
s
s
-
--
éù
¶
æö
êú
ç÷
¶
èø
ëû
¶
æöæö
+---
éù
-
ê
=
ç÷ç÷
¶
è
ú
èø
ëû
ø
ò
òò
2
32
32
22
22
22
2
2
33
222
22
32
22
2
174174
315315315315
1414
dd
2323
414
1d
32
hh
yz
xz
hh
xy
xxzz
h
ww
hch
tyttyt
m
m
zz
zzzz
hxyhx
mm
zz
zz
hxhxx
ff
r
s
--
-
æöæö
¶¶
¶¶
-+-
ç÷ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶
èøèø
¶
æöæö
¶
+-+-
ç÷ç÷
¶¶¶
èøèø
éù
¶
æöæö
¶¶
æö
-----
êú
ç÷ç÷
ç÷
¶¶¶
èø
èøèø
ëû
òò
2
22
322
2222
22
41444
1d1d0.
32
h
hh
yyxy
yzxz
hh
m
zzzz
zzmz
hyhyhh
s
s
--
éùéù
+
êú
¶¶
æöæöæö
----
êú
ëûëû
+-=
ç÷ç÷ç÷
¶¶
èøèøèø
ò
òò
22222
2222
33223223
2222
222
2
1
1
1
21
uEhuwwvwwu
hc
txxxxyyxyt
huwwwwvwwww
xtxxtxxtxytxyytyxyt
Ehvwwu
xyyxyy
rn
n
h
n
n
n
éù
æö
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
-++++
êú
ç÷
¶-¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ëû
éù
æö
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
-+++++
êú
ç÷
-¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ëû
¶¶¶¶
-+++
+¶¶¶¶¶¶
2
2
33322223
222
24444
22433
25555
2243
1
21
1
81
1
81
ww
yx
huvwwwwwwww
ytxytxytyxtxyytyxyt
Ehluuvv
xyyxyxy
hluuvv
xytytxyt
h
n
n
h
n
æö
¶¶
ç÷
¶¶
èø
æö
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
-+++++
ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
æö
¶¶¶¶
++--
ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
¶¶¶¶
++--
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
3
0,
xyt
æö
=
ç÷
¶¶
èø
22222
2222
33223223
2222
222
2
1
1
1
21
vEhvwwuwwv
hc
tyyyxyxxyt
hvwwwwuwwww
ytyytyytxytxtxyxxyt
Ehuwwv
xyxxyx
rn
n
h
n
n
n
éù
æö
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
-++++
êú
ç÷
¶-¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ëû
éù
æö
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
-+++++
êú
ç÷
-¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ëû
¶¶¶¶
-+++
+¶¶¶¶¶¶
2
2
33322223
222
24444
22433
25555
4223
1
21
1
81
1
81
ww
yx
huvwwwwwwww
xytxtyxtxytxtxyxxyt
Ehlvvuu
xyxxyxy
hlvvuu
xtxytxyt
h
n
n
h
n
æö
¶¶
ç÷
¶¶
èø
æö
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
-+++++
ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
æö
¶¶¶¶
++--
ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
¶¶¶¶
++--
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
3
0,
xyt
æö
=
ç÷
¶¶
èø
33
244
3
12
2222222
22
33
2
12
1
22
3444
24224
14
252315
14
cos()
252315
1
2
1252
www
hh
txtytxtyt
www
Ftcch
txtytxtyt
Ehwww
xxyy
ff
rr
ff
w
n
æöæö
¶¶
¶¶¶
-+-+
ç÷ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èøèø
æö
¶¶
¶¶¶
-+-+-+
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
æö
¶¶¶
+++
ç÷
-¶¶¶
éù
êú
ëû
éù
æö
êú
ç÷
è
û
¶
è
ø
ø
ë
3333
1212
3322
4444
3555
1212
242243322
2444
4224
4
315
14
2
1252315
7
2
130
xyxyxy
hwww
xtxytytxtytxytxyt
Ehlwww
xxyy
ffff
ffff
h
n
n
éù
æö
¶¶¶¶
-+++
êú
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ëû
æöæö
¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶
+++-+++
ç÷ç÷
-¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èøèø
æö
¶¶¶
+++
ç
+¶
éù
ê
¶
û
¶
ú
è
ë
¶
ø
3333
1212
3322
4444
2555
1212
42243322
2
22
22
1
10
71
2
13010
111
1222
xyxyxy
hlwww
xtxytytxtytxytxyt
Ehwwuw
yxyx
ffff
ffff
h
n
n
éù
æö
¶¶¶¶
-+++
êú
÷ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ëû
éù
æöæö
¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶
+++-+++
êú
ç÷ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èøèø
ëû
¶¶¶¶¶
æö
-+
ç÷
+¶¶¶¶
èø
+
2
2222
22
22222
12
22
11
2
22
44441
151515152
vwwwwvwww
xyxxyxyxyxy
wwuwuwvw
xyxyxyyyxyxxy
ff
é
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
æö
+++
ê
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ê
ë
ù
¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
+++++++
ú
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
û
2
332222
222
3332222
2
222
2
1113
12222
11
22
31
22
hwwuwwwwwww
ytxytxyxtxxyytx
wvwwwwvwuwv
xxytyxxytyxtxyytxyxt
wwwww
xyyxtxy
h
n
+
é
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
æö
-++
ê
ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ê
ë
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
+++++
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶¶
++
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
2
233
22
22
33
12
2
2
2
222222
2222222
2
2
14
215
4441
1515152
33
122
1
2
wwww
ytyxtxt
wwu
ytxtytyxyt
Ehwwuwvwuwwwvw
xxxxyyxxyyyy
w
y
ff
n
n
¶¶¶¶
æö
++
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ù
¶¶
¶¶¶
++++
ú
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
û
é
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
æö
æö
-++++
ê
ç÷
ç÷
-¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
èø
ê
¶
+
ë
+
¶
2
2
222
2
222
22
2
33222222
222222
1
2
2
2
1
wvwwwwww
xxyxxyxyxy
vwuwwu
yxxyyxy
hwwwuwwwwuwv
xtxxxtxxxtxxtyyt
w
y
h
n
æ
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
æö
æö
++
ç
ç÷
ç÷
ç
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
èø
è
ù
ö
¶¶¶¶¶¶
+++
ú
÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
ø
û
é
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
æö
-+++
ê
ç÷
-¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ê
ë
¶¶
+
¶
+
+
2
3322
222
2222222222
2222
22333
2
2
vwwwww
ytyytyyyt
wuwvwwwwwwwww
yxtxytyxyxtyxxtxyyt
wwwvwuwwww
xyxytxytxxytyyxxyt
n
¶¶¶¶¶
æö
++
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
æ
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
+++++
ç
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
è
ö
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
++++
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
22
222233
1212
2222
22
0,
3131
Elwwlww
hxyxyhxtytxtyt
ffff
h
nn
ù
ú
÷
ø
û
æö
æö
¶¶¶¶
¶¶¶¶
-+++-+++=
ç÷
ç÷
+¶¶¶¶+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
èø
2
32
32
11
22
22
333
12
2322
33
344
12
2322
174174
315315315315
417417
1315315315315
417417
1315315315315
ww
hch
txttxt
Ehww
xxxyxy
hww
xtxtxytx
ff
r
ff
n
n
ff
h
n
n
æöæö
¶¶
¶¶
-+-
ç÷ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶
èøèø
éù
æö
¶¶
¶¶
+-+-
êú
ç÷
-¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ëû
¶¶
¶¶
+-+-
-¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
22
33
21
1
22
33
342
121
22
23
4171744
131563063011515
4171744
131563063011515
1
110
yt
EhwEhw
xyxyyx
hwhw
xytytxytxtt
Ehlw
xy
ff
f
nn
fff
hh
nn
n
éù
æö
êú
ç÷
¶¶
èø
ëû
æö
¶¶
¶¶
æö
+--++
ç÷
ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶+¶
èø
èø
æöæö
¶¶¶
¶¶
+--++
ç÷ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶+¶¶¶
èøèø
¶
+
+¶¶
222
3
211
2322
333
244
112
3222
4444
2
1122
1
24223
2
1112
15101515
11121
11010151515
217
132520
w
xyxxy
hlww
xtxytxtytxyt
Ehlwh
hxyxyxyx
fff
fff
h
n
ffff
f
n
æö
¶¶¶
¶
++--
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶
èø
æö
¶¶¶
¶¶
++--+
ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
¶¶¶¶
¶
æö
++++--
ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
3
5555
22
11122
242233
2
217
0,
132520
y
hlwh
hxttytxytxytxyt
fffff
h
n
éù
æö
êú
ç÷
èø
ëû
éù
æöæö
¶¶¶¶¶
¶
++++--=
êú
ç÷ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èøèø
ëû
w
1
cos()
Ft
2
32
32
22
22
22
333
21
2322
33
344
21
2322
174174
315315315315
417417
1315315315315
417417
1315315315315
ww
hch
tyttyt
Ehww
yyxyxy
hww
ytytxytx
ff
r
ff
n
n
ff
h
n
n
æöæö
¶¶
¶¶
-+-
ç÷ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶¶
èøèø
éù
æö
¶¶
¶¶
+-+-
êú
ç÷
-¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
ëû
¶¶
¶¶
+-+-
-¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
22
33
12
2
22
33
342
212
22
23
2
4171744
131563063011515
4171744
131563063011515
1
110
yt
EhwEhw
xyxyxy
hwhw
xytxtxytytt
Ehlw
x
ff
f
nn
fff
hh
nn
n
éù
æö
êú
ç÷
¶¶
èø
ëû
æö
¶¶
¶¶
æö
+--++
ç÷
ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶+¶
èø
èø
æöæö
¶¶¶
¶¶
+--++
ç÷ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶+¶¶¶
èøèø
¶
+
+¶¶
222
3
122
322
333
244
221
2322
4444
2
2211
2
24223
2
1121
15101515
11211
11010151515
217
132520
w
yxyyxy
hlww
xytytxtytxyt
Ehlwh
hyxxyxyx
fff
fff
h
n
ffff
f
n
æö
¶¶¶
¶
++--
ç÷
¶¶¶¶¶
èø
æö
¶¶¶
¶¶
++--+
ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
¶¶¶¶
¶
æö
++++--
ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èø
3
5555
22
22211
242233
2
217
0.
132520
y
hlwh
hyttxtxytxytxyt
fffff
h
n
éù
æö
êú
ç÷
èø
ëû
éù
æöæö
¶¶¶¶¶
¶
++++--=
êú
ç÷ç÷
+¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
èøèø
ëû
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
11
22
33
44
55
(,)
11
(,)
11
(,)
11
11(,)
11
22(,)
11
(),
(),
()
(),
(),
MN
mnmn
mn
MN
mnmn
mn
MN
mnmn
mn
MN
mnmn
mn
MN
mnmn
mn
uxaybut
vxaybvt
wxaybwt
xaybt
xaybt
ff
ff
==
==
==
==
==
=YY
=YY
=CC
=FC
=CF
åå
åå
åå
åå
åå
(,)
()
mn
ut
(,)
()
mn
vt
(,)
()
mn
wt
1(,)
()
mn
t
f
2(,)
()
mn
t
f
Y
C