German Village 3rd Street Corridor Study
-
Upload
german-village-society -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
description
Transcript of German Village 3rd Street Corridor Study
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
1
THIRD STREET STREETSCAPETRAFFIC CORRIDOR STUDYAUGUST 7, 2010
CITY OF COLUMBUS
GERMAN VILLAGE SOCIETY
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
PROJECTTEAM
acknowledgementsMany German Village residents, individuals, committees and
City administrators contributed their time and ideas to this
planning effort. The following individuals and groups are to be
recognized for their significant contribution of thoughts, ideas
and collaboration that were integral to the development of a
responsive, successful Traffic Corridor Study
German Village Residents
German Village Society
German Village Streetscape Committee
German Village Board of Trustees
German Village Commission
Dr. Brian Santin, German Village Streetscape Committee Chair
Mark Kelsey, Director of Columbus Public Service Department
Tim Bell, Transportation Division, City of Columbus
Susan Delay, Columbus Department of Development
Gary Wilfong, Columbus Transportation Division Project Manager
Cristina Parady, Columbus Utility Coordinator
design teamKinzelman Kline Gossman, project lead, corridor design and
planning
Chambers, Murphy & Burge, historical appropriateness
Prime Engineering, site base preparation
executive summaryThe City of Columbus authorized Kinzelman Kline
Gossman to prepare the Third Street Corridor Study in
early 2009. This study addresses the public right-of-way
with a focus on the pedestrian environment. Third Street
was resurfaced with asphalt pavement in 2005 and the
City does not intend to re-surface or rebuild the street
pavement in the near future. The German Village Society
obtained the grant that made this study possible; one of
their primary goals is to restore the street to the historic
brick surface. Resurfacing the street with historic brick
pavement must be funded through sources other than the
Columbus Public Services Department.
This study resulted from a typical planning process with
significant public input throughout the process. Key
initial tasks included understanding the German Village
community vision for the Third Street Corridor and
conducting a thorough review of the historic archival
material to understand the historic streetscape conditions.
This was followed by an assessment of the physical
conditions. Preliminary concepts were generated to test
various strategies for the physical development of the
corridor. The best ideas were further developed into the
final preferred Third Street Corridor Concept described
in this document. The design team researched potential
funding sources available through grants and other
programs to assist the implementation of the project. An
implementation strategy was generated, including phasing
and preliminary budgets for each phase of work.
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
3
FINDIT
table of contentsHistorical precedents ..............................................1
Urban Assessment
Building Density.................................................4
Building Heights................................................4
Building/Land Uses............................................5
Circulation................................................5
Village Districts..................................................6
Existing Conditions............................................7
Existing Utilities..................................................8
German Village Vision .................................................9
Third Street Corridor Vision.........................................13
Corridor Concept.....................................................15
Streetscape Components
Roadway........................................................19
Sidewalks.......................................................23
Utilities..........................................................26
Lighting.........................................................29
Plantings........................................................30
Furnishings...................................................32
Signage.........................................................33
Sustainable.....................................................34
Composite Concept.........................................35
Key Areas
Livingston Gateway..........................................37
Commercial District.........................................43
Village Green.................................................49
Residential District / Schiller Park Gateway........54
Implementation Strategy
Phasing/
Budgets..................................................................60
Funding Sources.............................................71
Next Steps......................................................79
Appendix
Composite Plan..............................................81
Historical Photography.....................................82
Early Concepts & Studies.................................86
Private Development Recommendations............88
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
4
HISTORICAL PRECEDENT
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
5
Historical SettingGerman Village is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is also designated as a Preserve-America neighborhood. It was and continues to be characterized by narrow brick streets and homogeneous brick architecture. The Third Street Corridor has retained many of its historic attributes: a 47’ pavement width, lack of setbacks for structures, stone curbs, tidy private gardens, primarily residential use with scattered businesses and civic uses. The street was originally paved with brick; the parking lanes remained brick until the 1990’s. Key features of the Third Street Corridor that need to be protected include:
The street width and curb location; localized adjustments for traffic calming purposes are acceptable.The existing historic brick contained within the asphalt pavement profile must be protected. If funding becomes available, the historic brick should be reset to re-establish the historic street pavement. New curbs should be stone curbs to match the existing.The sidewalks should be re-surfaced with brick.Brick should be laid to replicate the existing patterns. Pavements, landscaping and hardscape features should be designed to retain the eclectic nature of the corridor.
•
•
•
•
• • •
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
6
URBAN ASSESSMENT
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
7
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
F R A N K F O R T
K O S S U T H
L I V I N G S T O N
W H I T T I E R
S C H I L L E R
P A RK
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyFigure Ground
Key
1-Story
2-Story
3-Story
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
F R A N K F O R T
K O S S U T H
L I V I N G S T O N
W H I T T I E R
S C H I L L E R
P A RK
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyBuilding Heights
Key
1-Story
2-Story
3-Story
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
F R A N K F O R T
K O S S U T H
L I V I N G S T O N
W H I T T I E R
S C H I L L E R
P A RK
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyBuilding Heights
Building HeightBuilding Density
Building DensityThe density and building placement contribute greatly to
the historic feel and charm of the streetscape
The density and building sizes are fairly consistent for the
length of the corridor; minor variations contribute to the
human scale and feel of the corridor.
Building HeightBuilding heights range from one to four story structures
The majority of the structures are one and a half or two
stories.
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
8
Key Civic
Office
Retail
Residential
Open Space
Parking Lot
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
F R A N K F O R T
K O S S U T H
L I V I N G S T O N
W H I T T I E R
S C H I L L E R
P A RK
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyLand Use
Key Civic
Office
Retail
Residential
Open Space
Parking Lot
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
F R A N K F O R T
K O S S U T H
L I V I N G S T O N
W H I T T I E R
S C H I L L E R
P A RK
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyLand Use
Vehicular Circulation
PedestrianCirculation
Traffic Light
Bus Stop
Key
Existing Street Parking Spaces
approx. 215
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
F R A N K F O R T
K O S S U T H
L I V I N G S T O N
W H I T T I E R
S C H I L L E R
P A RK
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyCirculation
Vehicular Circulation
PedestrianCirculation
Traffic Light
Bus Stop
Key
Existing Street Parking Spaces
approx. 215
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
F R A N K F O R T
K O S S U T H
L I V I N G S T O N
W H I T T I E R
S C H I L L E R
P A RK
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyCirculation
Building / Land Use Circulation
Building / Land UseThe predominant land use along Third Street is residential
Secondary land uses include office, commercial and institutional
CirculationThird Street is the primary north/south vehicular spine of German Village
Traffic signals at Livingston Avenue and Whittier Street
Third Street is two way traffic with parallel parking on both sides
Most side streets that intersect Third Street are two-way traffic
Small parking lots feed into Third Street at the north end of the corridor
Transit stops for COTA and buses for St. Mary’s school are located along the corridor
Existing on-street parking is approximately 215 spaces
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
9
Gaps in building frontage and density on
north end
Only surface parking lots along the corridor
(8 lots)
More generous front and side yards
Two 1-story structures & eight 3-story
structures out of 81
22 parcels contain office, commercial or
civic uses
27 parcels are residential
•
•
•
•
•
•
Commercial District
“Village Green”
Anomaly in streetscape character
Consistent high density on west side of street
Building frontage breaks down on east side
of street
Large setbacks for St. Mary’s, outdoor
courtyards and other yards
One 1-story structures & four 3-story
structures out of 23
6 parcels contain office, commercial or civic
uses
55 parcels are residential
Significant pedestrian activity
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Residential District
Consistent building frontage, scale and use
Structures are predominately placed on
ROW
Zero 1-story structures & one 3-story
structures out of 44
5 parcels are office or commercial use
39 parcels are residential
•
•
•
•
•
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
F R A N K F O R T
K O S S U T H
L I V I N G S T O N
W H I T T I E R
S C H I L L E R
P A RK
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyDistrict Zones
Gaps in building frontage and density on
north end
Only surface parking lots along the corridor
(8 lots)
More generous front and side yards
Two 1-story structures & eight 3-story
structures out of 81
22 parcels contain office, commercial or
civic uses
27 parcels are residential
•
•
•
•
•
•
Commercial District
“Village Green”
Anomaly in streetscape character
Consistent high density on west side of street
Building frontage breaks down on east side
of street
Large setbacks for St. Mary’s, outdoor
courtyards and other yards
One 1-story structures & four 3-story
structures out of 23
6 parcels contain office, commercial or civic
uses
55 parcels are residential
Significant pedestrian activity
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Residential District
Consistent building frontage, scale and use
Structures are predominately placed on
ROW
Zero 1-story structures & one 3-story
structures out of 44
5 parcels are office or commercial use
39 parcels are residential
•
•
•
•
•
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
F R A N K F O R T
K O S S U T H
L I V I N G S T O N
W H I T T I E R
S C H I L L E R
P A RK
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyDistrict Zones
Gaps in building frontage and density on
north end
Only surface parking lots along the corridor
(8 lots)
More generous front and side yards
Two 1-story structures & eight 3-story
structures out of 81
22 parcels contain office, commercial or
civic uses
27 parcels are residential
•
•
•
•
•
•
Commercial District
“Village Green”
Anomaly in streetscape character
Consistent high density on west side of street
Building frontage breaks down on east side
of street
Large setbacks for St. Mary’s, outdoor
courtyards and other yards
One 1-story structures & four 3-story
structures out of 23
6 parcels contain office, commercial or civic
uses
55 parcels are residential
Significant pedestrian activity
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Residential District
Consistent building frontage, scale and use
Structures are predominately placed on
ROW
Zero 1-story structures & one 3-story
structures out of 44
5 parcels are office or commercial use
39 parcels are residential
•
•
•
•
•
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
F R A N K F O R T
K O S S U T H
L I V I N G S T O N
W H I T T I E R
S C H I L L E R
P A RK
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyDistrict Zones
Gaps in building frontage and density on
north end
Only surface parking lots along the corridor
(8 lots)
More generous front and side yards
Two 1-story structures & eight 3-story
structures out of 81
22 parcels contain office, commercial or
civic uses
27 parcels are residential
•
•
•
•
•
•
Commercial District
“Village Green”
Anomaly in streetscape character
Consistent high density on west side of street
Building frontage breaks down on east side
of street
Large setbacks for St. Mary’s, outdoor
courtyards and other yards
One 1-story structures & four 3-story
structures out of 23
6 parcels contain office, commercial or civic
uses
55 parcels are residential
Significant pedestrian activity
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Residential District
Consistent building frontage, scale and use
Structures are predominately placed on
ROW
Zero 1-story structures & one 3-story
structures out of 44
5 parcels are office or commercial use
39 parcels are residential
•
•
•
•
•
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
F R A N K F O R T
K O S S U T H
L I V I N G S T O N
W H I T T I E R
S C H I L L E R
P A RK
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyDistrict Zones
17
Village Districts
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
10
Key
Brick Pavement
Street Tree
Crosswire
Architectural Landmarks
Open Yard
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
L I V I N G S T O N
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyLandscape Features
Key
Brick Pavement
Street Tree
Crosswire
Architectural Landmarks
Open Yard
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
L I V I N G S T O N
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyLandscape Features
Key
Brick Pavement
Street Tree
Crosswire
Architectural Landmarks
Open Yard
F R A N K F O R T
K O S S U T H
W H I T T I E R
S C H I L L E R
P A RK
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyLandscape Features
Key
Brick Pavement
Street Tree
Crosswire
Architectural Landmarks
Open Yard
B E C K
S Y C A M O R E
L I V I N G S T O N
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyLandscape Features
Existing Conditions - Northern Half Existing Conditions - Southern Half
PavementApproximately 50 percent of the sidewalk pavement is brick and the other half is concrete
Areas of both brick and concrete pavement are in poor conditions and are a danger to pedestrians
Brick pavement consists of a variety of different paver types, colors and patterns, including herringbone, running bond and basketweave
TreesThere are numerous street trees of varying species and in varying conditions
The street tree are located on an irregular spacing with large areas of sidewalk having no trees at all
Utility LinesThere are approximately 70 utility lines that cross Third Street
Utility poles are wooden and many are not plumb
Street lights are attached to the poles along the east side of the street only
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
11
City of Columbus Department of Public Utilities: Division of Sewers & Drainage-Inventory: -Combined Storm/Sanitary Main Line -Storm Inlets: 33 and Manholes: 17.-Size: Main Combined Storm/Sanitary Lines: 24”-48”-Clearance: 1’ Vertical (5’ if brick) and 3’ Horizontal (10’ if brick)-Depth: Varies from 6’-15’
City of Columbus Department of Public Utilities: Division of Water-Inventory: -Main Water Line -Fire Hydrant: 10-Size: Main Water Line: 6”-Clearance: 1’ Vertical and 3’ Horizontal
City of Columbus Department of Public Utilities: Division of Power-Inventory: -MELP owned and operated poles within Third St ROW: 28 (+10?) -MELP owned and operated Transformers within Third St ROW: 12
AEP: American Electric Power-Inventory: -AEP owned and operated poles within Third St ROW: 33 -AEP Transformers within Third St ROW: 16
Columbia Gas-Inventory: -Main Gas Line along both East and West Sidewalks -Size: Main Gas Line: 3”-Clearance: 1’ Vertical and 3’ Horizontal
Telecommunication Companies-Time Warner-ATT Ohio (formerly SBC)-WOW
Existing Utilities
Storm/Sanitary Main
Water MainWater Main Clearance
Storm/Sanitary Clearance
GasClearance
GasClearance
Gas MainGas Main
AEP
Telecommunications
MELP
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
12
RESIDENTS’ VISION
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
13
The following ideas were generated by the German Village Society, residents and the design team during the Corridor Walk-through and the Visioning Session.
General1. A celebrated, vibrant downtown neighborhood- historic integrity - a charming, pedestrian-friendly streetscape2. Balance a more pedestrian friendly street with the historic character3. Third Street should accommodate Oktoberfest4. German Village as the #1 tourist destination in Central Ohio5. Enhance the gateway at Livingston Avenue and Schiller Park6. Explore options for something like Worthington’s summer market7. Current interesting individuality & diversity should be preserved8. Don’t turn Third Street into Disney Main Street… be careful not to be too sterile9. Address the historic Gothic Revival Church of St. Mary’s as the defining landmark of the street10. The Schwartz Castle is a landmark, which could become part of the Gateway 11. Explore methods to increase the available parking without increasing pavement 12. Explore putting angled parking in certain, more commercial areas along Third Street. 13. Favor the pedestrian environment over vehicles, if a choice must be made.14. Sidewalks must be ADA accessible the entire length of the corridor.15. Identify and address major crossings along Third Street that should have crosswalks16. Resolve safety issues for dangerous intersections (Beck and Third).17. Explore curb extensions18. Explore mid street traffic calming19. Address high speed traffic20. Consider COTA bus stops and routes as part of overall design21. Re-grade curb ramps where needed to eliminate buildup of mud and debris.22. Explore variations of width of Third Street, curb-to-curb.
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
14
Pavements/Materials23. Make Third Street all brick again. 24. Brick at the intersections to enhance traffic calming and announce the pedestrian zone25. Explore long-term options for providing brick parking lanes26. Explore historic, aesthetic and traffic calming effects of brick streets27. Provide stone curbs and brick pavement in the street and sidewalks28. Restore the appropriate elevation of the stone curb29. Replace the brick where it was taken out when the new curb ramps were installed.30. One should know German Village by its high quality materials and charming environment31. The residents do not want concrete or asphalt pavement32. Maintain the same scale, proportions and materials of the surrounding predominant architecture.33. Brick seems to be the unifying element in the diverse German Village
Utilities34. Bury all utilities35. Explore options to remove cross-wires and any unnecessary lines36. Short term, can the utility poles be straightened or the material changed?37. Possibly use taller, metal poles so that fewer poles are needed and wires are higher and out of view.38. Explore if the utility lines can be moved to the rear of properties39. Solve the drainage issues and diminish maintenance costs to the City40. Provide better street lighting that addresses both sides of the street for safety.41. Explore using pedestrian scale lights and eliminating the traditional tall street lights.42. Sidewalks need to be better lit, using a pedestrian scale light.43. Address the combined sewer that runs through Third Street as much as this project will permit.44. Consider long-term streetscape solutions for utilities, drainage, materials and so on.45. Pedestrian lamps reminiscent of the cast iron gas lamps are desired.46. There are still some remains of cast stone storm sewer inlet installed at the curb. Some of them dated to . 47. Keep the design elements of this drainage system because of its historic significance.
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
15
Landscape Features48. Establish a minimum acceptable level of richness of materials, details and plantings49. Discourage turf grass in R.O.W.50. Place benches in the public R.O.W. so people feel comfortable sitting in them.51. Provide guidance on acceptable methods for tree plantings to prevent root upheaval.52. Address portions of the corridor that lack streetscape and pedestrian amenities.53. Strengthen the edge between the public and private property to maintain the scale and density of the corridor.54. Prevent successive properties from having a break in fencing/building frontage to preserve the historic urban character.55. Maintain the variety and diversity of brick patterns, details and plantings to maintain the charm of German Village.56. Organize magazine and newspaper stands and locate at strategic points.57. Group post office boxes and benches to encourage community.58. Provide opportunities for residents to hang plants and banners from new pedestrian lights59. Establish appropriate locations for bike racks throughout the corridor.60. Place street trees sporadically and with different species. 61. Consider eliminating street trees in front of commercial properties to be true to the historic character 62. Incorporate historic hitching posts, columns and limestone stepping stones to the extent possible.
Signage63. Reduce the amount of directional and regulatory street signage along Third Street. Change the appearance to minimize the visual impact.64. Explore unique street signage for German Village.65. Consider putting street signage on the side of buildings.66. Minimize the visual clutter at the Livingston gateway67. GVS Guidelines should be recognized but not perceived as confining the streetscape design.
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
16
CORRIDORVISION
create a BALANCE between contemporary function and historic integrity
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
17
4 requirements to ensure balanced design safety historic character functionality sustainable community
SAFETY HISTORICCHARACTER
FUNCTIONALITY
SUSTAINABLECOMMUNITY
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
18
CORRIDORCONCEPT
ECLECTIC: a range of patterns and colors of brick, plantings, and other furnishings
DISTRICTS: commercial and residential
VILLAGE GREEN: celebration of open space
COMMUNITY: a thriving, urban community
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
19
KEY
MAJOR INTERSECTION
MINOR INTERSECTION
BUS STOP
GATEWAY
**
**
*
KEY
VILLAGE GREEN
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
B L E N K N E R S T R E E T
L I V I N G S T O N A V E N U E
H O S T E R S T R E E T
B E C K S T R E E T
W I L L O W S T R E E T
S Y C A M O R E S T R E E T
F R A N K F O R T S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
S T I M M E L S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
W H I T T I E R S T R E E T
R E I N H A R D A V E N U E
C O N C O R D P L A C E
KEY
VILLAGE GREEN
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
MAJOR INTERSECTION
MINOR INTERSECTION
BUS STOP
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
GATEWAY
**
**
*
Intersections & Gateways Districts Composite
Precepts • Retain eclectic character.
• Celebrate the corridor with gateways.
• Distinguish major intersections with
curb extensions.
• Commercial District: fewer street
trees, more pavement.
• Village Green: visually ‘borrow’ the
open space for community.
• Residential District: more green,
tree lawns
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
20
KEY KEY
B L E N K N E R S T R E E T
L I V I N G S T O N A V E N U E
H O S T E R S T R E E T
B E C K S T R E E T
W I L L O W S T R E E T
S Y C A M O R E S T R E E T
F R A N K F O R T S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
S T I M M E L S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
W H I T T I E R S T R E E T
R E I N H A R D A V E N U E
C O N C O R D P L A C E
KEY
OVERHEAD UTILITIES OVERHEAD UTILITIES
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
SIGNIFICANT TREES TO REMAIN
SIGNIFICANT TREES TO REMAIN
PROPOSED TREES
PROPOSED TREES
Utility Corridors Street Trees Composite
Precepts • Clean up and eliminate visual utilities
where possible.
• Retain existing trees that are healthy
and have reasonable life spans.
• Tree planting varies per district.
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
21
-Roadway-Sidewalk-Utilities-Lighting-Plantings-Furnishings-Signage
STREETSCAPECOMPONENTS
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
22
ROADWAYMATERIALS
Three options of roadway materials brick asphalt brick parking lanes and asphalt travel lanes
BRICK
SPLIT
ASPHALT
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
23
ROADWAYHISTORIC CURBS
Maintain existing curb layout between all major intersections maintain historic road width replace with stone curbs reestablish full height curbs
+/- 46’
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
24
ROADWAYCURB EXTENSIONS
Provide curb extensions at all major intersections safer pedestrian crosswalks protection to on-street parking spots broaden cone of vision for stopped traffic at cross streets
34’
6’
6’
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
25
ROADWAYMULTI-MODAL
9’
PAR
KIN
GBI
KE L
ANE
CAR
LAN
E
CAR
LAN
E
BIKE
LAN
EPA
RKI
NG
4’10’
10’4’
9’
Promote multiple modes of transportation calm traffic by narrowing the width of the travel lanes encourages an active lifestyle enhance pedestrian travel
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
26
SIDEWALKZONES
The sidewalk has three primary zones walkway zone generally provides an 8 foot wide path free of objects and meets ADA standards amenity zone includes all furnishings, lights, and signs clear zone allows for the people to move between their car and the amenity zone
5’+/-8’
2’
AMEN
ITY
ZON
EW
ALKW
AY
CLE
AR Z
ON
E
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
27
SIDEWALKMATERIALS
Sidewalk materials: brick sidewalks with varying patterns reuse existing brick when possible variety of colors that matches the existing brick match textures and styles of the existing brick match or maintain existing patterns of brick
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
28
SIDEWALKACCESSIBILITY
Maximize the accessibility along the entire corridor follow ADA guidelines to ensure accessibility to all pedestrians provide curb ramps at all intersections provide a smooth surface design a consistent cross slope across sidewalk
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
29
UTILITIESEXISTING
Existing utilities overhead utility lines crisscross the street and clutter the environment other utilities run below the pavement and parallel to the curb
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
30
UTILITIESOVERHEADOPTION 1
Overhead utility lines consolidate overhead wires and eliminate cross wires provide fewer, taller metal poles to reduce visual clutter eliminate all signs and lights from utility poles
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
31
UTILITIESOVERHEADOPTION 2
Below grade utility lines and transformer vaults bury all overhead utilities underneath street bury transformers within vaults at curb extensions as needed
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
32
LIGHTINGPEDESTRIANROADWAYMAST ARMS
General characteristics of the lighting design provide even light distribution to increase visibility
black poles and fixtures with appropriate character: recommend City standard fixtures
accessorize light poles with banners and hanging baskets
all pedestrian lights preferred; or provide roadway lights on one side of street, pedestrian lights on the pother side
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
33
PLANTINGSLANDSCAPE BEDS
General characteristics of the landscape beds raised stone curbing around proposed trees flush planters around existing trees tree lawn south of Kossuth Street plant low groundcovers and perennials in all tree planters
EXISTING
PROPOSED
TREE LAWN
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
34
PLANTINGSSTREET TREESGROUNDCOVERSPERENNIALS
General characteristics of the plant palette street trees: urban tolerant, high canopy, and seasonal color groundcovers: low, evergreen, and salt tolerant perennials: array of seasonal colors and textures
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
35
FURNISHINGSSEATINGBIKE RACKWASTE/RECYCLINGNEWS CORRALS
General characteristics of the furnishing design furnishings should compliment historical context durable furnishings with black finish family of benches, waste/recycling receptacles, and bike racks historic remnants
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
36
SIGNAGEINFORMATIONALDIRECTIONALREGULATORY
General characteristics of the signage design family of signs distinct to Third Street pick up on traditional German Village symbols and colors simplify signs and posts
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
37
SUSTAINABLEGREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
General characteristics of the sustainable design recycle/reuse of material use of local/regional materials promote walkability and community green methods to treat stormwater quality
Detain water in planters
Brick Sidewalk
DrainageDrainage
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
38
COMPOSITECOMPOSITECONCEPT
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
39
KEYAREAS
1 Livingston Gateway
2 Commercial District
3 Village Green
4 Residential District / Schiller Park Gateway
1
2
3
4
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
40
LIVINGSTONGATEWAY
-Brick Piers
-Flush Brick Intersection
-Mast Arms
-Simple, Elegant MaterialsKA
TZIN
GER
’S D
ELI
LIVINGSTON AVENUE
CO
LDW
ELL
BAN
KER
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
41
-Expanded Dining
-Variety of Paving Patterns
-Brick Crosswalks
LIVINGSTON GATEWAY
Mast Arm
Planters
Outdoor Dining
Plant Bed
News Corral
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
42
-Asphalt Street Option
-Flush Brick Intersection
KATZ
ING
ER’S
DEL
I
LIVINGSTON AVENUE
CO
LDW
ELL
BAN
KER
LIVINGSTON GATEWAY
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
43
LIVINGSTON GATEWAY
SIDEWALK SIDEWALKROADWAYCURBEXTENSION
CURBEXTENSION
BIKE LANE
BIKE LANE
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
44
LIVINGSTON GATEWAY
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
45
LIVINGSTON GATEWAY: ASPHALT OPTION
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
46
COMMERCIALDISTRICT
-Trees and Perennials in Planters
-Maintain Significant Trees
-More Random Tree Planting
-Enhance Visibility SYCAMORE STREET
STAR
BUC
KS
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
47
-Transit Stop Enhances Community:
-News Corrals -Benches
-Post Office Box
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Bus Shelter
Bench
Planter Bed
Litter Receptacle
Informational Sign
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
48
-Asphalt Street Option
SYCAMORE STREET
STAR
BUC
KS
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
49
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
SIDEWALK SIDEWALKROADWAYPARKING PARKINGBIKE LANE
BIKE LANE
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
50
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
51
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT: ASPHALT OPTION
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
52
VILLAGEGREEN
-German Village “civic” area
-Open Lawn Area
-Private Ownership
-Semi-Public Use
-Visual Open Space
SAINT MARY’S ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SAINT MARY’SCHURCH
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
53
-Asphalt Option
SAINT MARY’S ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SAINT MARY’SCHURCH
VILLAGE GREEN
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
54
VILLAGE GREEN
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK VILLAGE GREENROADWAYPARKING PARKINGBIKE LANE
BIKE LANE
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
55
VILLAGE GREEN
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
56
VILLAGE GREEN: ASPHALT OPTION
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
57
RESIDENTIALDISTRICT &SCHILLER PARK GATEWAY-Tree Lawns
-More Street Trees
-More Residential
-More Green Transitions to the Park
REINHARD STREET
SCHILLER PARK
CONCORD PLACE
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
58
-Asphalt Option
REINHARD STREET
SCHILLER PARK
CONCORD PLACE
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT &SCHILLER PARK GATEWAY
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
59
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT &SCHILLER PARK GATEWAY
SIDEWALK SIDEWALKROADWAYPARKINGFRONT YARD PARKINGBIKE LANE
BIKE LANE
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
60
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT &SCHILLER PARK GATEWAY
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
61
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT &SCHILLER PARK GATEWAY: ASPHALT OPTION
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
62
BUILDIT
develop a STRATEGY that will enable the implementation of the streetscape to occur either as a single, large project; or as a series of smaller projects, over time, to respond to funding opportunities
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
63
This Traffic Corridor Study is the first part of an extensive design and documentation process that must be completed before any construction can actually begin. The next steps that must be budgeted for and executed are a survey and Preliminary Engineering. The Columbus Division of Transportation has indicated that the soft costs for this project should be in the range of 10% to 14% of the construction value; including survey, geotechnical investigations, preliminary and final engineering, and permits
This Traffic Corridor Study has been prepared using available base maps and record documents to determine the locations of utilities and other physical features This information is reasonably accurate; sufficient for a high level planning document such as this. An actual survey that includes topography, easements, underground and overhead utilities and all physical features must be procured before Preliminary Engineering can begin. Preliminary Engineering is a much more detailed design and engineering exercise. It will be valid to the extent that current, accurate survey information serves as the basis for those activities. The Preliminary Engineering will also require the collection and assessment of geotechnical information about the conditions of the existing soils and base materials. Preliminary engineering will address the corridor as a whole. Sufficient information will be developed during this phase of work to generate more detailed and precise estimates of probable construction costs. The potential phasing of the project can then be re-evaluated and fund-raising can be targeted to better-defined projects and capital costs. The Final Engineering can be performed for the entire corridor or broken down by phase.
Fund Raising
Preliminary Engineering
Final Engineering
Re-assess Budgets
and Project Phasing
Survey
PHASING /BUDGETING Geotechnical
Investigation
Phase One Construction
Fund Raising
Final Engineering
Future Phased Construction
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
64
This page outlines a conventional phasing strategy that accomplishes complete sections of the Third Street corridor over time. A major benefit of this strategy is that the streetscape environment is completed, albeit in only a portion of the Third Street Corridor. This would demonstrate the benefits of the upgrades and potentially could enhance fund-raising efforts. Certain features of the proposed streetscape enhancements are challenging to implement in a piecemeal fashion: especially grading and utilities. There would likely be additional costs incurred to provide temporary transitions to fit the new systems into the existing conditions.
These preliminary budgets are order-of-magnitude estimates of likely costs and are based on the limited information available at the time of this design study. The budgets are based on 2010 construction costs and include a modest design contingency. These budgets should be updated when Preliminary Engineering is conducted and actual survey information is available.
The estimated probable cost of the construction for the Corridor will range between $7.8M and $10M. If the utilities are all buried underground and the street is rebuilt with brick, the overall cost will increase to $23.6M to $26.9M. The cost breakdown for this phasing strategy is as follows: Base Project With UpgradesLivingston Gateway $550,000 - $650,000Livingston to Sycamore $2.5M to $3.2M $8.0M to $9.1MSycamore to Kossuth $2.5M to $3.2M $8.0M to $9.1MKossuth to Reinhard $2.1M to $2.7M $6.8M to $7.8MReinhard Gateway $250,000 to $300,000
Livi
ngst
on
Syc
amor
e
Bec
k
Fran
kfor
t
Kos
suth
Whi
ttier
Rei
nhar
d
LivingstonGateway
LivingstonGateway to Sycamore Avenue
ReinhardGateway
Sycamore Avenue to Kossuth Avenue
Kossuth Avenue to Reinhard Gateway
PHASING /BUDGETING
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
65
This page and the subsequent diagrams outline a phased systems construction strategy that can be accomplished in smaller pieces, over time. This will allow progress to be made in achieving the vision with more modest fund-raising targets. Each phase of work indicated in this plan is described and budgeted as a complete project in itself. Phasing the work will require some duplication of efforts and temporary measures. If the project can be accomplished in fewer, larger phases, the costs, temporary measures and complexity of the process will be reduced.
The gateway improvements are listed in this sequential phasing, but would be great stand-alone projects that would be strong physical manifestations of the vision and planning process for the Third Street Corridor. Early implementation of the recommended gateway improvements could continue the momentum generated by this planning process and build enthusiasm for the fund raising and completion of the Corridor Plan.
The cost range for each phase of work and any potential upgrades is indicated on each of the phase diagram sheets that follow.
*The decision for above ground vs below ground utilities shall be made prior to the Sidewalk Improvements Project to ensure that appropriate connections for buried utilities can be designed.
Below Ground
Above Ground
Curbs Sidewalks*
Gateways
Planting
Lighting
Furnishings
Signage
RoadwayUtilities
PHASING /BUDGETING
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
66
DESCRIPTIONThe first phase of work will be replacement of the existing curbs with new stone curbs on both sides of Third Street for the entire corridor between East Livingston Avenue and Reinhard Avenue. The new stone curbs will be set at the same location and elevation as the existing curbs. A narrow strip of street pavement and sidewalk pavement on each side of the curb will need to be removed and replaced to enable the construction process. We recommend that when the street pavement is patched, the surface be sloped down towards the face of the curb to provide a consistent 4” to 6” exposed curb face. This will facilitate better drainage of the street pavement and re-establish a legitimate curb edge along Third Street until the street pavement can be replaced at some future date.• Stone curbs• Repair 18-inch width sidewalk• Repair 18-inch width pavement with asphalt• Salvage historic brick• Replace 50% curb inlets
ASSUMPTIONS•All historic brick that is embedded within the existing street pavement in the affected area will need to be salvaged and stored for future use.
•The new curb shall have downspout drain sleeves provided at appropriate locations to accommodate future sidewalk and drainage improvements.
•The street drainage primarily occurs in curb inlet drainage structures. Any curb inlets that do not meet current City standards or that are in poor condition should be replaced and/or repaired at this time.
•Any conduit needed for future utility work should be placed beneath the new curbs at this time.
•New curbs shall extend around the radius at cross-street intersections.
•Recently installed ADA wheelchair ramps will remain in place unless their location directly conflicts with future crosswalk locations.
CONSTRUCTION BUDGET: $800,000 - $1,000,000
CURBS
Stone Curb
Drainage Sleeve
Adjacent Pavement
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
67
DESCRIPTIONThis phase of work centers on rebuilding the sidewalks on both sides of the street for the entire corridor between East Livingston Avenue and Reinhard Avenue. The existing sidewalks are approximately half brick and half concrete over the corridor. Most of the existing walks do not meet ADA because the surface is very uneven due to the pavement heaving from tree roots and poor base conditions. The existing sidewalk surface material and base will be removed. The subbase will be removed and/or repaired where needed to correct the situation. All new or salvaged brick shall be placed on an asphalt setting bed over a concrete base. Existing tree and plant beds will be removed if they conflict with the new design. Where new plant beds surround existing trees to remain, edging, curbs or walls shall be completed per the design.• Re-use existing brick • All brick surface• Utility conduit placed• Some plant bed edging• Foundations for future structures, poles• Structural topsoil in plant beds
ASSUMPTIONS•The type and pattern of existing brick sidewalks will be documented, for salvage and resetting in the same location.
•Private and public utilities will have the opportunity to upgrade and repair their services while the sidewalk pavement is open.
•Underground downspout connections will be provided between the curbs and the R.O.W. line.
•Conduit shall be placed for future underground electric, cable, telephone and other utilities that are currently overhead.
•Private drive aprons shall be rebuilt with brick to fit within the re-graded sidewalk surface.
•Where existing trees are designated to remain, the plant beds shall be fully constructed, including structural topsoil, curbs and other edge treatments.
•No new landscaping is included, except seeding of all new plant beds and tree lawns.
CONSTRUCTION BUDGET: $3.5M - $3.8M
SIDEWALKS
Downspout Connection
Brick Pavement
New Plant Bed
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
68
DESCRIPTIONThis phase of work focuses on reducing the visual impact of overhead utilities on both sides of the street for the entire corridor between East Livingston Avenue and Reinhard Avenue. Currently AEP has lines on one side of the street and Columbus Division of Power has lines on the opposite side of the street. Each utility serves mostly customers on the opposite side of the street from where their lines are located. There are approximately 70 occurrences of utility lines crossing this section of Third Street. The existing utility poles have numerous lines attached; some of which may be redundant or inactive. We recommend that the existing wooden utility poles be replaced with metal poles. The metal poles should be taller and hopefully fewer in number. All inactive, redundant lines shall be removed. The majority, if not all, of the cross wires shall be eliminated. • Replace wooden poles with high mast arm metal poles• Eliminate cross wires• Remove unneeded lines
ASSUMPTIONS•The new metal utility poles will have no signs or light fixtures attached to them.
•Overhead utility lines on cross streets that intersect Third Street are not included in this work.
•Any street lights or signs currently mounted on utility poles will need to be relocated to dedicated posts.
CONSTRUCTION BUDGET: $1.8M - $2.1M
OVERHEAD UTILITIES
Telecommunications
AEP MELP
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
69
DESCRIPTIONA potential upgrade to clean up the overhead utilities is to bury them. The existing overhead lines, located on both sides of Third Street, include AEP, Columbus Division of Power, AT&T, Sprint, WOW and other cable and telecommunications companies. Each private or public utility that is required to bury its lines must be reimbursed for the expense as part of the project costs. Existing utilities beneath the pavement reduce the available space for underground electric lines to a ten-foot strip adjacent to the curb on both sides of the street. Preliminary investigations indicate that the electric service may require the entire width, other utilities such as cable and telecommunications would need to be placed beneath the sidewalk pavement. This 10-foot wide parking aisle is where historic brick is buried beneath the asphalt pavement. Transformers that are currently mounted on utility poles will need to be located in underground vaults. The number of transformers should be able to be reduced, but these must be carefully located to reduce the visual impact.• Bury overhead utilities• Sub-grade vaults for transformers• Street repaired with asphalt• Sidewalk repaired with brick to match existing
ASSUMPTIONS•The historic brick in the street pavement will be salvaged and stored for future use.
•Overhead utility lines on cross streets will remain.
•The underground connections will go back to the nearest existing utility pole on cross streets and other perpendicular connections.
•Private property owners will likely be caused to move and/or upgrade their electric panels.
CONSTRUCTION BUDGET: $13.8M - $15.8M
PROJECT UPGRADES•Repair street pavement with historic brick. Additional cost: $1.2M - $1.4M
UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES
Connection to Property
Underground Utilities
Underground Utilities
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
70
GATEWAYSDESCRIPTIONThe Plan calls for enhanced gateways at the intersections of Livingston Avenue and Reinhard Avenue to announce the entrance onto this important corridor. Brick pavement is to be provided in the intersections of Livingston Avenue and Reinhard Avenue with Third Street. Brick and stone piers are located on the north side of Livingston Avenue to frame that entrance. If the street pavement is surfaced in brick, we recommend that the brick pavement in these intersections be a different color and pattern to further distinguish the intersections. The mast arms at Livingston Avenue will be relocated into the curb extensions to maintain the appropriate relationship to the traffic lanes. Benches, planters and special planting will further enhance both of the gateways.•Livingston Avenue intersection•Reinhard intersection•Brick pavement in intersection, distinct color•Brick crosswalks•Relocate mast arms•Benches, planters, plantings•Brick piers at Livingston Avenue•Provide pedestrian signals
ASSUMPTIONS•The curb extensions on Third Street at these intersections shall be constructed as part of this phase of work.
•The Livingston Avenue gateway has been coordinated with current plans for the I-71/I-70 Improvements. Further coordination will be required as the highway plans advance and are implemented.
•We recommend this work be deferred until the decision is made on whether or not to bury overhead utilities along the Third Street Corridor, but the gateways improvements could be completed as stand-alone projects at almost any point.
•This budget assumes that the curbs, street improvements and overhead utility work have been completed in previous phases of work.
CONSTRUCTION BUDGET:
Livingston Avenue Gateway $550,000 - $650,000
Reinhard Avenue Gateway $250,000 - $300,000
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
71
PLANTINGSDESCRIPTIONPlant street trees and other plant materials in plant beds and tree lawns. Plants will primarily consist of trees, low evergreen ground covers and some seasonal perennials that are tolerant of urban conditions such as drought, salt and alkaline soils.•Street Trees•Evergreen Groundcovers•Seasonal Perennials
ASSUMPTIONS•Plant beds and tree lawns will have been constructed during the previous sidewalk phase.
•Structural topsoil will have been provided during the previous sidewalk phase.
•All new plants will be watered and maintained during the initial one-year period by the German Village Society and resident volunteers to provide consistent, timely maintenance and enhance the establishment of the plant materials.
•All permanent planting in plant beds and tree lawns shall be installed as part of the planned streetscape improvements in accordance with the approved design.
CONSTRUCTION BUDGET: $275,000 - $350,000
Street Tree
Planting Bed
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
72
LIGHTINGDESCRIPTIONReplace existing street lights with a combination of new pedestrian and street lights. The existing City of Columbus standard light fixtures are very compatible with the historic setting of German Village and are recommended for the Third Street corridor. The Plan calls for taller street light fixtures on one side of the street and shorter pedestrian scale pole lights on the opposite side of the street. We recommend the corridor be evaluated to ascertain if pedestrian scale pole lights on both sides of the street will provide adequate light levels. If pedestrian scale lights provide adequate lights; these should be provided instead of standard street lights as an upgrade to the project.•Street lights •Pedestrian light poles
ASSUMPTIONS•New lights shall be connected and powered via underground lines installed in conduit.
•The conduit was previously installed in the sidewalk phase of work.
•All existing light poles and foundations shall be removed as part of this work.
•Foundations for new light poles have been constructed during the sidewalk phase of work.
CONSTRUCTION BUDGET: $750,000- $850,000
Pedestrian Light
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
73
FURNISHINGSDESCRIPTIONProvide comprehensive streetscape furnishings including seating, bike racks, kiosks, transit shelters, news corrals, waste and recycling containers, and planters. The furnishings will help to further define the special environment of German Village.•Seating•Bike Racks•Kiosks•Transit Shelters•News Corrals•Waste and Recycling Containers•Planters
ASSUMPTIONS•All needed electrical conduit will be installed during the sidewalk phase of work.
•All needed foundations will be installed during the sidewalk phase of work.
•All furnishings will be bolted down to the concrete sub-base and will not require an additional foundation (except transit shelters).
CONSTRUCTION BUDGET: $150,000 - $200,000
Bench
Planter
Bike Rack
LitterReceptacle
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
74
SIGNAGEDESCRIPTIONProvide comprehensive streetscape signage including informational and historical signage, seasonal banners, directional signs, and regulatory signs. The signage will help to further define the historic legacy of German Village while providing direction to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic.•Historical Signs•Seasonal Banners (to be placed atop pedestrian light poles)•Directional Signs•Regulatory Signs
ASSUMPTIONS•All signs will be core drilled through concrete sub-base and set within aggregate sub-grade below the sidewalk. No further foundations will need to be poured.
•Signs will not be illuminated and therefore not require conduit to be run prior to completing the sidewalk phase of work.
CONSTRUCTION BUDGET: $80,000 - $120,000
Informational Sign
Directional / Regulatory Sign
Banner
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
75
ROADWAYDESCRIPTIONBuild new curb extensions and patch existing pavement as needed on Third Street with a surface of asphalt. The brick that currently exists within the pavement profile in the curb extension areas will be salvaged and stored for future use. The existing subbase and base materials may be replaced or repaired as needed to provide for sound construction. Curb extensions shall be provided at designated intersections to slow traffic and enhance pedestrian safety. The curb extensions will require that some catch basins be added or relocated to preserve and enhance the drainage patterns.• Provide curb extensions• Stripe in bike lanes on existing pavement and when construction occurs
ASSUMPTIONS• Any remaining historic brick in the street pavement will be salvaged and cleaned for re-use.
• Private and public utilities will upgrade and/or repair any utilities in need of attention while the street pavement is open.
• The gateway improvements are not included as part of the basic work of this phase.
• Existing mast arms will be relocated at the Whittier Street intersection.
• Assume 20% of subbase will need to be removed and replaced.
CONSTRUCTION BUDGET: $475,000 - $600,000 POTENTIAL UPGRADES
• Construct the street surface with salvaged historic brick. The quantity available may need to be supplemented.
Additional Cost: $3,800,000 - $4,200,000
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
76
FUNDINGSOURCES
Third Street is a significant streetscape project; it will be complex, expensive and will require a joint public and private effort to come to fruition. The City of Columbus Public Utilities Department has indicated that certain upgrades desired by the local community, such as brick pavement and burial of utilities are beyond the normal scope of improvements funded by the City. These upgrades must be paid for with private funds, grants and other sources of financing outside of the Columbus capital budget.
Fund raising will be significant task in the implementation of the Third Street Corridor Plan. The funding needed to complete the engineering and construction of the recommendations will likely come from a number of sources, both public and private. The Implementation Strategy has been devised to respond to the potential funding and enables the construction to progress in smaller, incremental steps. The Preliminary Engineering process should address the corridor as a whole: many of the streetscape components are systemic features that span the length of the corridor and greatly impact one another.
This section provides a summary of potential funding sources that may be possible for the Implementation of the Third Street Corridor improvements. Some of the grants and other sources identified apply to the design and engineering process; others are targeted towards actual capital expenditures.
Columbus Capital Funds
Private Donations
Preliminary Engineering
Final Engineering
Phased Construction
Grants
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
77
In this country’s bicentennial year, German Village and many other historic centers, were fortunate enough to take advantage of preservation funding made available by the Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the excitement of the bicentennial celebrations. Almost four decades later, the fruits of those investments are apparent as the concepts touted by the HPA of 1966 have become more mainstream. For those who have been proponents of recycling and restoring our built environment, each project that brings a few more people to the reality of preserving our history is a milestone worth marking.
However, the ways of “doing business” have changed. Clearly, the voice of the United States government echoes these sentiments in unique programs like the Save America’s Treasures and Preserve America programs. Not every grass roots effort can meet the criteria for these programs. Raising funds to continue the good work is a continuous struggle. The included information is a condensed version of research toward that end. The granting and financing opportunities that are listed herein represent the beginning of a concentrated effort to secure funding for preservation programs for Third Street and for German Village. It should be understood that most major projects cannot be funded by grants alone. Most projects require a good sound base of support that includes volunteers, staffers, private and public funding, grants, loans, community fund-raising events, and generally good fund-raising counsel. And there is one more thing… …effort.
The information included herein is divided into three categories – State Programs, Non-Profit Programs, and Corporate and Family Foundation Programs. Each program is noted with its application date or the cycle on which it is reviewed or awarded. The grant amounts are listed, if they are fixed, with the contact information, the match amounts and the eligibility restrictions. It is important to note that the eligibility restrictions do not always eliminate possibilities. With creative counsel and open-minded trustees, often public and private partnerships can be established which expand the opportunities.
One significant piece of information listed herein is the DESCRIPTION. The descriptions often address the goals or the mission of the agency or of the particular fund. If the goal of the particular project accurately addresses the goals of the fund or funding agency, the chances are greatly increased for an award. To be quite pointed, in the past, there was an expectation of cash falling from the sky just because it is a “great project”. Reality will demonstrate that the organizations who are the most successful at receiving grants are those who are not afraid to 1) ask, 2) do homework, 3) work collaboratively, 4) expect restrictions, and 5) be patient. It is important to note as well, groups who work closely with the agency are more likely to understand the shared goals. What is it that makes this project worth funding?
FINDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR GERMAN VILLAGE SOCIETY AND CITY OF COLUMBUS
ORGANIZATION/GRANTPROGRAM
APPLICATIONDATES DESCRIPTION GRANT
AMOUNT MATCH ELIGIBILITY CONTACT
STATE PROGRAMSOhio Historical Society/Ohio Historic Preservation OfficeCertified Local Governments CFDA #15.904
June 1, 2010
Projects to develop comprehensive plans for the preservation of historic, architectural, and archaeological resources, to survey and/or nominate properties to the NRHP, to develop master plans and/or feasibility studies for NRHP properties, to acquire and to develop properties listed on the NRHP, and conduct public education programs related to historic preservation.
$5,000minimumrequest.Grantstypically
$9,000 to $15,000
60 / 40 CLG
Grants ManagerOhio Historic Preservation OfficeOhio Historical Society567 E. Hudson StreetColumbus, OH 43211-1030(614) 298-2000(614) 298-2037 (Fax)www.ohiohistory.org/resource/[email protected]
Ohio General AssemblyState Capital Appropriations Bill
Talk to your legislator by
summer of odd numbered years.
(Capital Bill enacted spring
of even numbered
years.)
Biennial state capital appropriations bill funds acquisitions, rehabilitation, restoration, and exhibit curation for local historical organization improvement projects sponsored by state legislators. Bill enacted spring of even numbered years. Funded projects are administered by the Ohio Cultural Facilities Commission. Although there is not a formal application process, the commission offers guidance on how to pursue funding on its web site: www.culture.ohio.gov
Varies None
State Senator or Representative from your district.www.ohio.gov
Ohio Department of Development Economic Development Program
Open Window Cycle
Provides funds to units of local government to provide gap financing for local business development. Except for local infrastructure needs, Economic Development Program funds are repaid to the local community's Revolving Loan Fund to provide funding for additional business assistance activities. LG
Office of Housing and CommunityPartnershipsEconomic and Community DevelopmentOhio Dept. of Development77 S. High StreetColumbus, OH 43216(614) 466-2285www.odod.state.oh.us
Microenterprise Business Development Program
FY 2010:August 6, 2010
Provides grants to eligible cities and counties and non-profit organizations to assist in the development of local microenterprise businesses and to create and retain long-term jobs in the private sector. Microenterprises are defined as for-profit entities with five or fewer employees, one of whom owns the business.
LG, NP, NPO
Office of Housing and CommunityPartnershipsEconomic & Community DevelopmentOhio Dept. of Development77 S. High StreetColumbus, OH 43216(614) 466-2285www.odod.state.oh.us
Ohio Department of Natural Resources
Chambers, Murphy & Burge copyright 2010 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES‐‐THIRD STREET CORRIDOR‐‐KKG 1 of 6
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
78
FINDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR GERMAN VILLAGE SOCIETY AND CITY OF COLUMBUS
ORGANIZATION/GRANTPROGRAM
APPLICATIONDATES DESCRIPTION GRANT
AMOUNT MATCH ELIGIBILITY CONTACT
Natureworks
February 1, 2010 Yearly
Cycle
Nature Works provides up to 75% state reimbursement funds for acquisitions, development or rehabilitation of public park and recreation areas.
75/25 LG, PD, CD
Mary FitchODNR, Real Estate & Land Management2045 Morse Road, Bldg. C-4Columbus, OH 43229-6693(614) [email protected]
Ohio Department of TransportationTransportation EnhancementProgram
Solicitationsbegin
January 1 Yearly Cycle; Letter of Interest due to District officeFebruary 1
Yearly Cycle
The Federal Highway Administration's Transportation Enhancement Program provides funds for projects that enhance the transportation experience by improving the cultural, historic, aesthetic and environmental aspects of transportation infrastructure. Each state decides how to use it's enhancement funds. In Ohio, funds are split between Ohio's 17 MPOs and the rest of the state. MPO and statewide funds are distributed competitively. Funds can be used for construction or major rehabilitation only.
Typical:$500,000 to$1,000,000,
No Max
80/20cash only GE, MPD
Randy Lane, Program ManagerOhio Dept. of TransportationOffice of Local Projects1980 W. Broad St., 2nd FloorColumbus, OH 43223(614) 644-8211www.dot.state.oh.us/local
National Scenic Byways
April(Applicationsavailable in February)
The National Scenic Byways Program provides technical and financial assistance to help preserve America's scenic roads and promote tourism and economic development. The National Scenic Byways Discretionary Grants program provides funding for byway-related projects each year, as part of the Federal Highway Administration's Discretionary Grants Program. Projects to support and enhance National Scenic Byways, All-American Roads and State-designated byways are eligible. Applications are prepared online but submitted through the State's byway program agency.
Varies 80/20
Paul StaleyOhio Department of TransportationCentral Office1980 West Broad StreetColumbus, OH 43223(614) 728-5078
Ohio Arts Council (OAC)Capacity Building
Ongoing
Capacity building funds are designed to strengthen Ohio's non-profit arts and cultural sector by helping applicants improve internal governance and leadership, cultivate strategic community linkages, and develop financial and human resources for long-term stability. Building organizational capacity is a long-term, evolutionary process that organizations must engage in purposefully. The program provides funding for work in three areas of capacity: Organizational Governance and Leadership, Strategic Community Linkages and Assets and Resources Development.
$500 to $5,000 50/50 CAC, CE, LI,
NPO
Ohio Arts Council727 E. Main St.Columbus, OH 43205-1796(614) 466-2613www.oac.state.oh.us
Ohio Humanities Council (OHC)
Chambers, Murphy & Burge copyright 2010 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES‐‐THIRD STREET CORRIDOR‐‐KKG 2 of 6
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
79
FINDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR GERMAN VILLAGE SOCIETY AND CITY OF COLUMBUS
ORGANIZATION/GRANTPROGRAM
APPLICATIONDATES DESCRIPTION GRANT
AMOUNT MATCH ELIGIBILITY CONTACT
Major Grants
February 1September 1 (Proposalsconsidered
twice a year.)
Humanities must be the central focus. Best suited for projects with regional or statewide impact; those which attract large & diverse audiences, humanities institutes for teachers or professionals, film/video documentaries and media projects.
$5,001-$20,000 50/50 NP
Jack ShortlidgeOhio Humanities Council471 E. Broad Street, Suite 1620Columbus, OH 43215-3857(614) 461-7802(800) 293-9774(614) 461-4651 (Fax)www.ohiohumanities.org
Regular Grants
First businessday of each
month (minimum 8 weeks
prior to project start).
Short term projects of limited scope; one component of a larger project which receives funding from several sources, lectures for special occasions, panel discussion, and other singe-site programs.
$2,001-$5,000 50/50 NP
Frank Dunkle or Jack ShortlidgeOhio Humanities Council471 E. Broad Street, Suite 1620Columbus, OH 43215-3857(614) 461-7802(800) 293-9774(614) 461-4651 (Fax)www.ohiohumanities.org
Mini-Grant
Applicationsaccepted year-
round(minimum of 5 weeks prior to
projectstart).
Short term projects of limited scope; one component of a larger project which receives funding from several sources, lectures for special occasions, panel discussion, and other singe-site programs.
Up to $2,000 50/50 NP
Frank DunkleOhio Humanities Council471 E. Broad Street, Suite 1620Columbus, OH 43215-3857(614) 461-7802(800) 293-9774(614) 461-4651 (Fax)www.ohiohumanities.org
NON-PROFIT PROGRAMS
Heritage OhioOhio Main Street Program
1. Call for Application
Workshop 2. Letter of Intent
A program of professional advice and guidance in the use of the proven Main Street Four-Point Approach to start or strengthen revitalization efforts.
noncash -technical
assistanceLG
Heritage Ohio846 1/2 East Main StreetColumbus, OH 43205(614) 258-6200www.heritageohio.org
Chambers, Murphy & Burge copyright 2010 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES‐‐THIRD STREET CORRIDOR‐‐KKG 3 of 6
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
80
FINDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR GERMAN VILLAGE SOCIETY AND CITY OF COLUMBUS
ORGANIZATION/GRANTPROGRAM
APPLICATIONDATES DESCRIPTION GRANT
AMOUNT MATCH ELIGIBILITY CONTACT
National Trust for Historic PreservationJoanna Favrot Fund
February 1, 2010
Provides nonprofit organizations and public agencies grants for projects that contribute to the preservation or the recapture of an authentic sense of place. Individuals and for-profit businesses may apply only if the project for which funding is requested involves a National Historic Landmark. Funds may be used for professional advice, conferences, workshops and education programs.
$2,500 -$10,000
50/50Cashonly
NP, GE
National Trust for Historic PreservationMidwest Regional Office53 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 350Chicago, IL 60604(312)[email protected]
Jeffris Heartland Fund
February 1,June 1 andOctober 1
Established by the Jeffris Family Foundation to support important historic preservation projects in the states of Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri and Ohio. Applicants must be able to demonstrate the viability of their project through the submittal of early planning studies, and must be ready for the preparation of a Historic Structure Report or other advanced planning studies, leading toward a community-centered capital fund drive.
$5,000 -$50,000 NP, LG
Koren Vanzo, Program AssistantNational Trust for Historic PreservationMidwest Regional Office53 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 350Chicago, IL 60604(312)[email protected]
National TrustPreservation Funds February 1,
June 1 andOctober 1
(Contract the NTHP
Regional Office prior
to submittingapplication).
National Trust Preservation Funds provide two types of assistance to nonprofit organizations and public agencies:1) matching grants for preservation planning and educational efforts, and2) intervention funds for preservation emergencies. Matching grant funds may be used to obtain professional expertise in areas such as architecture, archeology, engineering, preservation planning, land-use planning, fund raising, organizational development and law as well as to provide preservation education activities to educate the public.
Matchinggrants
are $500 -$5,000
50/50Cashonly
NP, LG, CDC, CE
National Trust for Historic PreservationMidwest Regional Office53 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 350Chicago, IL 60604(312) [email protected]
National Trust CommunityInvestment Corporation(NTCIC)
N/A
The NTCIC makes equity investments in real estate projects that qualify for federal historic rehabilitation tax credits and when available, state historic tax credits and New Markets Tax Credits. NTCIC works with a wide variety of property owners including for-profit developers, non-profit organizations and local governments. Our focus is on projects that have a strong economic revitalization impact on the surrounding community. The timing of the equity contributions is flexible and negotiable. Frequently used pay-in benchmarks include admission to the LLC, placement in-service, Part 3 approval, and project stabilization.
N/A NP, LG, CDC, CE
National Trust Community InvestmentCorporation1785 Massachusetts Ave., NWWashington, DC 20036(202) 588-6001(202) 588-6436 (Fax)[email protected]
National Park Service - Department of the Interior
Chambers, Murphy & Burge copyright 2010 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES‐‐THIRD STREET CORRIDOR‐‐KKG 4 of 6
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
81
FINDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR GERMAN VILLAGE SOCIETY AND CITY OF COLUMBUS
ORGANIZATION/GRANTPROGRAM
APPLICATIONDATES DESCRIPTION GRANT
AMOUNT MATCH ELIGIBILITY CONTACT
Preserve America
Most recent:Applicationdeadline
February 12, 2010
The Preserve America matching-grant program provides funding to designated Preserve America Communities to support preservation efforts through heritage tourism, education and historic preservation planning. NOTE: Designated Preserve America communities, neighborhoods, SHPOs, THPOs, CLGs that have applied for PA status
$20,000 -$250,00 50/50 See note in
description
Heritage Preservation GrantsNational Park Service1201 Eye Street NW (2256)Washington, DC 20005(202) 354-2020www.preserveamerica.gov
National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH)Challenge GrantCFDA # 45.130
May 5, 2010
NEH challenge grants help institutions and organizations secure long-term improvements in and support for their humanities programs and resources. Awards are made to museums, public libraries, colleges, research institutions, historical societies and historic sites, public television and radio stations, universities, scholarly associations, state humanities councils, and other nonprofit entities. Where clearly related to the humanities, direct expenditures from Challenge Grant awards are allowable for items that have inherent longevity such as renovation of facilities.
$30,000 -$1,000,000 25/75
Office of Challenge GrantsNational Endowment for the HumanitiesRoom 4201100 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.Washington, DC 20506(202) [email protected]
CORPORATE and FAMILY FOUNDATION PROGRAMSCorporate Grant ProgramsAmerican Electric Power (AEP)
N/A
AEP Sponsors special programs to encourage economic development, education, the environment, hunger, housing, health, and safety within its traditional service territory. Priority is based on the perceived overall benefit to the community in Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia.
Varies NP
Deffers by State… Ohio Contact Info:AEP Ohio850 Tech Center DriveGahanna, OH 43230http://www.aep.com/citizenship/community/corpGive/
The Eaton Charitable Fund
N/A
The highest priority is local organizations that serve the needs of Eaton employees and offers to them the opportunity to provide leadership, voluntary services, and personal financial support. Program support and capital grants are given to health, human services, civic, and cultural organizations. Support to educational institutions is given but the trust has a preference for engineering, scientific, technological and business-related projects. The fund also has expressed interest in arts and cultural programs, higher education, children and youth services, family services, community development, neighborhood development, and economic development. Eaton lends it support through general or operating funds, capital campaigns, building/ renovation, program development, employee matching gifts and in-kind gifts.
Varies NP
Eaton Charitable FundEaton Center1111 Superior AvenueCleveland, OH 44114-2584216/523-4944http://www.eaton.com/ecm/groups/public/@pub/@eaton/@corp/documents/content/ct_242488.pdf
Chambers, Murphy & Burge copyright 2010 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES‐‐THIRD STREET CORRIDOR‐‐KKG 5 of 6
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
82
FINDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR GERMAN VILLAGE SOCIETY AND CITY OF COLUMBUS
ORGANIZATION/GRANTPROGRAM
APPLICATIONDATES DESCRIPTION GRANT
AMOUNT MATCH ELIGIBILITY CONTACT
JP Morgan Chase
N/A
JP Morgan Chase awards funding in the following areas: community asset development, youth education and community life.
VariesNP (with additional
restrictions)
Deffers... Central Ohio Contact Info:Jeffrey LyttleP.O. Box 710157Columbus, OH [email protected] regarding Cybergrants / application process, please e-mail [email protected]://www.jpmorganchase.com/corporate/Corporate-responsibility/corporate-responsibility.htm
Coporate and Family FoundationsDuke Energy Foundation
Applications for following year
reviewed middle of current year
The Duke Energy Foundation seeks to improve the quality of life in its community through the areas of environment, economic development and community vitality.
Varies NP, GE
Lisa TeasdellDuke Energy Foundation [email protected] APPLY ONLINEhttp://www.duke-energy.com/community/foundation.asp
Nationwide Foundation
Sept. 1, 2010 (Application not available until
May 2010)
The Nationwide Foundation makes operating, project and capital grants. Capital grants are limited and considered on a case-by-case basis. In order of emphasis, Nationwide supports efforts that meet: emergency and basic needs, stabilization needs, individual development needs, and community enrichment needs (such as arts and culture organizations, higher education and civic improvement). Varies NP
MUST APPLY ONLINEhttp://www.nationwide.com/about-us/nationwide-foundation.jsp
Surdna
Review in Feb, May, & Sept.Submit 3 to 4
months prior to desired review
The Surdna Foundation makes grants to nonprofit organizations in the areas of environment, community revitalization, effective citizenry, the arts, and the nonprofit sector.
Varies NP, 501(c)(4)
(212) [email protected] APPLY ONLINEhttp://www.surdna.org
Chambers, Murphy & Burge copyright 2010 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES‐‐THIRD STREET CORRIDOR‐‐KKG 6 of 6
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
83
WHAT ARETHE NEXT STEPS
Publicize the plan (all)
Conduct preliminary engineering (City)
Capital budgeting (City)
Assign fund raising tasks (GVS)
Prepare grant applications (GVS)
Final design and engineering (City)
Phase Construction
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
84
APPENDIX COMPOSITE PLAN
HISTORICAL PHOTOGRAPHY
EARLY CONCEPTS & STUDIES
PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
85
COMPOSITEPLAN
LIVI
NG
STO
N A
VEN
UE
BLEN
KNER
STR
EET
HO
STER
STR
EET
BEC
K S
TREE
T
WIL
LOW
STR
EET
SYC
AMO
RE S
TREE
T
FRAN
KFO
RT S
TREE
T
CO
LUM
BUS
STR
EET
REIN
HAR
D A
VEN
UE
LAN
SIN
G S
TREE
T
WH
ITTI
ER S
TREE
T
LAN
SIN
G S
TREE
T
KOSS
UTH
STR
EET
CO
LUM
BUS
STR
EET
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
86
475 S Third 479 S Third
492 S Third
480 S Third
1975LIVINGSTON
HISTORICALPHOTOGRAPHY
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
87
571 S Third
595 S Third
624 S Third
1880’s
1963
BECK
541 S Third
1990
1960’s 1960’s
HISTORICALPHOTOGRAPHY
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
88
631 S Third627 S Third
664 S Third
1961
1890
SYCAMORE
650 S Third
1912
HISTORICALPHOTOGRAPHY
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
89
793 S Third769 S Third
858 S Third 911 S Third
KOSSUTH
WHITTIER
HISTORICALPHOTOGRAPHY
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
90
B L E N K N E R S T R E E T
L I V I N G S T O N A V E N U E
H O S T E R S T R E E T
B E C K S T R E E T
W I L L O W S T R E E T
S Y C A M O R E S T R E E T
F R A N K F O R T S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
S T I M M E L S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
W H I T T I E R S T R E E T
R E I N H A R D A V E N U E
C O N C O R D P L A C E
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
Concept 1:
Minimalist approach Mixture of brick and concrete sidewalks Curb extensions Striped crosswalks Flush brick intersection at Reinhard Avenue Variety of street tree planting treatments
••••••
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyConcept 1: Eclectic
B L E N K N E R S T R E E T
L I V I N G S T O N A V E N U E
H O S T E R S T R E E T
B E C K S T R E E T
W I L L O W S T R E E T
S Y C A M O R E S T R E E T
F R A N K F O R T S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
S T I M M E L S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
W H I T T I E R S T R E E T
R E I N H A R D A V E N U E
C O N C O R D P L A C E
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
F R A N K F O R T S T R E E T
Concept 2:
Brick “threshold” at Livingston Avenue Brick sidewalks Striped crosswalks Consistent street width Uniform street tree planting
•••••
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyConcept 2: Uniformity
B L E N K N E R S T R E E T
L I V I N G S T O N A V E N U E
H O S T E R S T R E E T
B E C K S T R E E T
W I L L O W S T R E E T
S Y C A M O R E S T R E E T
F R A N K F O R T S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
S T I M M E L S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
W H I T T I E R S T R E E T
R E I N H A R D A V E N U E
C O N C O R D P L A C E
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
VILLAGE G
REENC
OM
MERC
IAL DISTRIC
TRESID
ENTIAL D
ISTRICT
CO
MM
ERCIAL D
ISTRICT
Concept 3:
Brick sidewalks Curb extensions Gateway crosses Livingston Flush brick intersections at Livingston, Whittier and Reinhard Raised brick intersections at Blenkner, Sycamore and Frankfort Striped crosswalks at all other intersections Landscape reflects different districts
••••
•
••
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyConcept 3: Districts
B L E N K N E R S T R E E T
L I V I N G S T O N A V E N U E
H O S T E R S T R E E T
B E C K S T R E E T
W I L L O W S T R E E T
S Y C A M O R E S T R E E T
F R A N K F O R T S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
S T I M M E L S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
W H I T T I E R S T R E E T
R E I N H A R D A V E N U E
C O N C O R D P L A C E
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
Concept 1:
Minimalist approach Mixture of brick and concrete sidewalks Curb extensions Striped crosswalks Flush brick intersection at Reinhard Avenue Variety of street tree planting treatments
••••••
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyConcept 1: Eclectic
B L E N K N E R S T R E E T
L I V I N G S T O N A V E N U E
H O S T E R S T R E E T
B E C K S T R E E T
W I L L O W S T R E E T
S Y C A M O R E S T R E E T
F R A N K F O R T S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
S T I M M E L S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
W H I T T I E R S T R E E T
R E I N H A R D A V E N U E
C O N C O R D P L A C E
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
F R A N K F O R T S T R E E T
Concept 2:
Brick “threshold” at Livingston Avenue Brick sidewalks Striped crosswalks Consistent street width Uniform street tree planting
•••••
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyConcept 2: Uniformity
B L E N K N E R S T R E E T
L I V I N G S T O N A V E N U E
H O S T E R S T R E E T
B E C K S T R E E T
W I L L O W S T R E E T
S Y C A M O R E S T R E E T
F R A N K F O R T S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
S T I M M E L S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
W H I T T I E R S T R E E T
R E I N H A R D A V E N U E
C O N C O R D P L A C E
K O S S U T H S T R E E T
L A N S I N G S T R E E T
C O L U M B U S S T R E E T
VILLAGE G
REENC
OM
MERC
IAL DISTRIC
TRESID
ENTIAL D
ISTRICT
CO
MM
ERCIAL D
ISTRICT
Concept 3:
Brick sidewalks Curb extensions Gateway crosses Livingston Flush brick intersections at Livingston, Whittier and Reinhard Raised brick intersections at Blenkner, Sycamore and Frankfort Striped crosswalks at all other intersections Landscape reflects different districts
••••
•
••
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyConcept 3: Districts
Concept 1: Eclectic Concept 2: Uniformity Concept 3: Districts
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
91
Back In Parking
Designated Bike LanesExisting Conditions
Channelized IntersectionCurb Extensions
Turn Lane / Flush Median
Drive Lane
Parking
46’9’ 10’ 10’ 9’4’ 4’
Bike BikeParking
46’
Drive Lane
9’ 14’ 9’14’ParkingDrive Lane Parking Drive
Lane
49’
9’ 10’ 13’ 17’Parking Drive
LaneDriveLane
ParkingParking TurnLane
46’9’ 10’ 8’ 10’ 9’
ParkingDriveLane
DriveLane
Parking
46’
Drive Lane
9’ 10’ 10’ 9’8’ParkingDrive
LaneMedianDrive
LaneParking
46’9’ 10’ 10’ 9’4’ 4’
Bike Bike
Parking Drive Lane
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyTraffic Calming Studies
Flush Intersection with Paved CrosswalksFlush Intersection w/ Striped Crosswalks
Raised Intersection with BrickFlush Intersection w/ Brick
Striped crosswalk, typ.
Curb extension, typ.
5’
9’
5’
9’
T H
I R
D
S
T R
E E
T
Detectable warning pavers, typ.
Brick paved crosswalk, typ.
Curb extension, typ.
Concrete band, typ.
Detectable warning pavers, typ.
10’ Wide slope transition6’ Wide slope transition
Brick paved intersection
T H
I R
D
S
T R
E E
T
5’
9’
Brick paved crosswalk, typ.
Curb extension, typ.
Concrete band, typ.
Detectable warning pavers, typ.
T H
I R
D
S
T R
E E
T
Brick paved intersection
5’
9’
Brick paved crosswalk, typ.
Curb extension, typ.
Concrete band, typ.
Detectable warning pavers, typ.
T H
I R
D
S
T R
E E
T
Existing Condition
T H
I R
D
S
T R
E E
T
Detectable warning pavers, typ.
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyIntersection Studies Early Intersection Studies Early Traffic Calming Studies
Third Street Streetscape Traffic Corridor Study1.27.2010
92
Preliminary Design Recommendations: Private Development
Maintain the building frontage line with wrought iron fencing, hedge row & landscaping Express owner’s individuality in front yard gardens Brick driveways / parking areas Stone or terra cotta planters
•
•••
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyPrivate Development
Preliminary Design Recommendations: Private Development
Maintain the building frontage line with wrought iron fencing, hedge row & landscaping Express owner’s individuality in front yard gardens Brick driveways / parking areas Stone or terra cotta planters
•
•••
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyPrivate Development
Preliminary Design Recommendations: Private Development
Maintain the building frontage line with wrought iron fencing, hedge row & landscaping Express owner’s individuality in front yard gardens Brick driveways / parking areas Stone or terra cotta planters
•
•••
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyPrivate Development
Preliminary Design Recommendations: Private Development
Maintain the building frontage line with wrought iron fencing, hedge row & landscaping Express owner’s individuality in front yard gardens Brick driveways / parking areas Stone or terra cotta planters
•
•••
Third Street Streetscape - Traffic Corridor StudyPrivate Development
PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
General characteristics of the private development maintain building frontage line with wrought iron fencing, hedge row and landscaping express owner’s individuality in front yard gardens stone or terra cotta planters