Germain VirtualPower

download Germain VirtualPower

of 21

Transcript of Germain VirtualPower

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    1/21

    The Method of Virtual Power in Continuum Mechanics. Part 2: Microstructure

    P. Germain

    SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 25, No. 3. (Nov., 1973), pp. 556-575.

    Stable URL:

    http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0036-1399%28197311%2925%3A3%3C556%3ATMOVPI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-V

    SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics is currently published by Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtainedprior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content inthe JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.

    Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained athttp://www.jstor.org/journals/siam.html.

    Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printedpage of such transmission.

    The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academicjournals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers,and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community takeadvantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

    http://www.jstor.orgThu Jul 5 19:38:11 2007

    http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0036-1399%28197311%2925%3A3%3C556%3ATMOVPI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Vhttp://www.jstor.org/about/terms.htmlhttp://www.jstor.org/journals/siam.htmlhttp://www.jstor.org/journals/siam.htmlhttp://www.jstor.org/about/terms.htmlhttp://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0036-1399%28197311%2925%3A3%3C556%3ATMOVPI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-V
  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    2/21

    THE METHOD OF VIRTUAL POWER IN CONTINUUM MECHANICS.

    PART

    2 :

    MICROSTRUCTURE

    Abstract. Th e advantages of a systematic application of the m ethod of virtual power are exemplified

    by the study of continuous media with microstructure. Results on micromorphic media of order one

    are easily found and the equations of motion for the general micromorphic medium are established

    for the first time. Various interesting special cases, which have been previously considered in the

    li terature, may be derived upon imposing some convenient constraints. The paper ends with some

    comparisons with other related work.

    1. Introduction.

    In a recent note ( Ge rma in (1972)). it was emphasized how

    the classical method of virtual work may be used in a more systematic way than

    it has been in the past in order to derive the fundamental equations of a given

    theory in con tinuu m m echanics. As an exam ple, first and second gradient theories

    have been considered with some details in a m ore recent paper (G erm ain (1973a)).

    It is not claimed of course that the idea is new. Nevertheless, it may give new

    insight into som e questions which have been treated so far by more con ventional

    tools. Mo re im portant , i t provides the shortest way to obtain the required equa-

    tions and t o avoid any am biguity or er ror . Recent papers from Casal (1972) and

    Breune val (1973) give new illu stration s of the relev ance of this prop osition .

    The present co ntribu tion is related to co ntinu ous media inside which micro-

    structure may be taken into ac cou nt. This topic has been considered by ma ny

    auth ors, for instance, Mindlin (1964) an d Eringen and his coworkers in m any

    pap ers published since 1964--some of them m ay be found in the References.

    These media are called "microm orphic" in Eringen's termino logy. Th e present

    paper is quite limited in scope. The main steps of the application of the method

    are briefly reviewed in 4 2. Then classical equations for equilibrium in the most

    simple case are derived in

    3.

    The dynamical equations require special attention

    ( 5 4) .

    Generalizations when a more refined description of the kinematics and of

    the stresses is desired follow in 5 5. Special cases and comparison with other

    theories are finally considered in 5 6 and 7. We do not intend in this paper to

    introduce constitutive relations which of course must be taken into account in

    order to be able to apply a micromorphic theory to specific physical problems.

    Numerous papers in the literature deal with these applications. Our aim here is

    just to give a new illustration of the simplicity and usefulness of the method of

    virtual power.

    Th e aut ho r is specially pleased to be able to publish this work in the volume

    dedicated to Professor Prage r a nd t o join his friends and colleagues in this tribute

    of adm iration a nd g ratitud e to this great scientist who, in a q uite different context,

    has shown on many occasions how d'Alembert 's principle of virtual work is a

    very precious tool in various problems of continuum mechanics.

    Received by the editors Ma rch 12. 1973.

    tuniversity of Paris (VI). Place Jussieu, PARIS,

    5 .

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    3/21

    METHOD OF V I R T U A L POWE R

    Th e following n otation is used :

    i v e l o c i t y (c om p on en ts ).

    Di s t r a i n r ate t ensor.

    g r a d i e n t of the relat ive veloc it ies-symmetr ic pa r t : micro-

    X i j

    strain rate tensor, antisymmetric part : microrotation rate

    tensor.

    V i j

    r e l a t i v e mic rove loci ty g rad ien t.

    x i jk

    7

    s e c o n d gradient of the relat ive ve locit ies.

    . I J ~

    0 = 0

    -intrinsic stress tenso r.

    1 J J 1

    S. .

    i n t r i n s i c m ic ro st re ss t en s or .

    v . .

    L ~ -intrinsic second microstress tensor.

    zij aij sij-stress tensor.

    f

    -volumic force.

    y j

    -volumic dou ble force.

    s u r f a c e trac tio n.

    Mi -surface dou ble traction .

    i a c c e l e r a t i o n .

    ' .

    1 1 -microacceleration.

    2

    Description of the method Without going into too many details, i t is

    nevertheless worthwhile to review the main ideas involved in the application of

    the me thod . Forces an d stresses are not introduce d directly but by the value of

    the virtual power they prod uce for a given class of virtual motion s. The n, roughly

    speaking, if one extends the class of virtual motions which are considered, one

    refines the description of forces and stresses.

    M ore precisely, for a given system

    S

    and at a given time, a virtual motion is

    defined by a vector field V on

    S : V

    is the field of virtual velocities.

    A

    class of virtual

    motions is a vector space

    Y

    whose elements are

    V.

    Th e "system of forces" one

    wants to consider is defined by a linear continuous application

    Y

    R

    o r

    Y real number, is the virtual power produced by "this system of forces" in the

    virtual motion V. Obviously, Y must be a topological vector space in order to

    be able to define the continuity of 9 ( V ) .

    In fact, virtual velocities like real velocities are defined with respect to a

    given fram e. Th e velocity fields of th e

    same

    virtual mo tion in two different frames

    differ only by a rigid body velocity field

    C

    Rigid body velocity fields, sometimes

    called distributor define a vector space g It will always be assumed in what

    follows tha t

    g

    is a subspace of Y

    Th e various "forces" which act on the mechanical system are divided in a

    very classical way into two classes :

    externa l forces

    which represent the dynamical

    effects on

    S

    due to the interaction with other systems which have no common

    part with

    S

    a n d internal forces which represent the mutual dynamical effects

    of subsystems of

    S ;

    or in stan ce, if

    S

    and

    S

    are tw o disjoint subsystems of

    S

    the

    action of S on S represents "external forces" acting on S J but "internal forces"

    i on e considers the system

    S

    itself. Let us stretch the m eanin g of the word "forces"

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    4/21

    558 P.

    G E R M A I N

    for the time being an d let it be taken in the vague sense it may have in the com m on

    language and not in any precise mathematical conception it may receive (and

    will eventually receive below).

    It is crucia l to notice tha t the definition of the virtual power of intern al

    forces is subject to a limita tion which may be expressed as the following axiom .

    A X I O MO F POWEROF I N T E R N A L F O R C E S

    Th e virtual polr,er of the inter nal

    forces acting on a syste m S for a given cirtual mo tion is an objective qu an tit y;

    i.e., it has the same value whatecer be th e jkanze in which the m otion is observed.

    I t

    is obviously equivalent to stat e:

    Th e virtual power of the internal forces acting on a syst em

    S

    is null for an y

    dlstributor.

    It is quite clear that this axiom is the counterpart in this presentation of

    dynam ics of the principle of super pose d rigid body motion or of the principle

    of objectivity (material indifference). External forces are no t subjected to a

    similar limitation. It is barely necessary to recall d'Alembert's famous statement

    :

    PRIN IPLE Le t a sys tem be in equilibriunz with respectF

    VIRTUALPOWER.

    to a given G alilean fi.am e; th en, in any virtual ,notion , the cirtual power of all the

    inter nal forces and ex ter na l forces acting on

    S

    is null.

    Looking at the definition of the virtual power, one sees that the natural

    mathem atical frame for such a theory would be the frame of generalized functions

    or distributions. In fact we will not use it, first for simplicity and second because,

    as we are dealing with physical ph eno me na, one may reasonably assume that the

    distributions involved are regular enough in orde r to be represented by func-

    tions ( or densities ). T o be m ore ex plicit, let us close this section by recalling

    briefly the simplest situa tion which leads to th e classical theo ry.

    Assume that

    S

    is a simple connected open do ma in in equilibrium in a given

    Galilean frame. The crucial point in order to build a continuum theory is to

    decide on the kinematical descr iption which will be used, i.e., to choose and V,

    and the linear application

    V +

    Choose V as a velocity field Ui defined on

    S

    ( U i are the comp one nts of a velocity vector in an ortho norm al C artesian frame)

    and state that the definition of

    9

    will involve th e valu e of U i an d of its first deriva-

    tives U i S j .The correspon ding theory is the first gradient theory (G erm ain (1973a)).

    Th e internal forces acting on a given subd om ain of S have a virtual power

    which may be w ritten1

    2 ) i )

    S

    p d v

    with

    p

    a linear form on Ui and U i S j .But with the axiom , only the symmetric part

    of the gradient can be involved and then

    (3)

    p

    = J J

    D . .

    J = % U . . U . . ), l

    g D

    I , J

    Here a defines a symmetric second order tensor called the

    intrinsic stress

    tensor.

    Follo win g the classical assum ption s, external forces acting on B will

    We assume here that p is defined at every point M of S independently of the subdomain 3

    This assum ption mean s that internal forces are short range forces and excludes, as is usually

    done in continuum mechanics, long range internal forces . This more general case, which may also

    be investigated by the present metho d. is not considered in this paper

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    5/21

    559

    ETHOD OF

    V I R T U A L

    POW R

    be of two types first long rang e volume forces, prod uce d on by systems located

    outside S , giving the virtual power

    3

    J

    ( f , u i C i j n i j

    OijDij)

    d r .

    where nijis the antisymm etric part of U i,j.Form ula (4) shows th at f , is the volumic

    force, Ci j and O ij the antisym metric and symmetric volumic double force-Cjj

    is in fact a volumic couple; usually all these quantities

    f , ,

    Cij ,

    c ij

    are considered

    as given (some of them may be zero of course). Second, contact forces are con-

    sidered, produced on by the parts of

    S

    located outside , giving the virtual po wer

    (it is not necessary to w rite here the con tributio ns of R ij and Dij because it may be

    shown that they must be ze ro) ; 7 ; defines the usual traction a cting on the bou nda ry

    of Using

    2 ,(3), (4) , 5 )

    and applying the principle of virtual power, one finds

    after some integrations by pa rts that

    f , oi j , j C . . O . . ) U i

    c

    (7,

    (o i j

    C i j

    @ .

    .)n

    .I

    U .

    d o

    0

    I 1 1 3 1

    [ I

    I

    which must be satisfied for any motion U i. It is easy to show that,

    i f

    one introduces

    the stress tensor zij,

    one must have

    Form ulas (6) an d (7) are the fu ndam ental equations of the first gradient theory,

    which reduces to the classical theory if one assum es tha t Cij Q ij

    0

    3 Equilibrium of a micromorphic continuum of degree 1

    The main point in

    the application of the method, as reviewed above, is to define the kinematics of

    the virtual motions which are being considered. In the classical description, a

    con tinuu m is a contin uous distribution of particles, each of them being represented

    geonletrically by a point M and characterized kinenlatically by a velocity Ui.

    In a theory which takes microstructure into acco unt, from the macroscopic point

    of view (which is the point of view of a continuum theory), each particle is still

    represented by a point M, but its kinematical properties are defined in a more

    refined way. In order to discover how to define the kinematical properties of a

    particle, one has to look at it from a microscopic point of view. At this level of

    observation, a particle appears itself as a continuum

    P

    (M ) of small extent. Let

    us call M its center of.mass, M a point of

    P

    (M ), Ui the velocity of M, xi the co-

    ordinates of M in a Ca rtesian fram e parallel to the given frame xi with M as the

    origin, U: the velocity of M with respect to the given frame, and xi the coordina tes

    of M in the given frame . If on e assume s for the mom ent that the xi ar e given,

    i.e., if one looks at a given particle, the field U I ap pe ars a s a function of the

    x

    defined on

    P

    (M ). As

    P

    (M ) is of small exten t, it is natu ral t o look at the Tay lor

    expansion of U( with respect to the x j an d also, as a first app roxim ation , to s top

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    6/21

    560 P G E R M I N

    this expansion with the terms of degree 1. Then, with this assumption, one can

    write

    (8)

    C'i U .

    + ;C..'u

    I

    1 J . J '

    The physical significance of this assu mption is cle ar : one pos tulates that

    one can get a sufficient description of the relative motion of the various points

    of the particle if one assum es that th is relative motio n is a hom ogen eou s deforma-

    tion. With such an assumption, the macroscopic kinematical description of our

    continuum will be completely defined if one knows two fields on S, the

    velocity

    field U , , and the field x of the gradients of the relative velocities of P

    M),

    also

    called the

    nticrocelocity

    gradient, x obviously being a second order tensor.

    The

    sym metr ic part of ;c,, will be called the nlicrostrain rate tenso r, the antisym met ric

    part-the nlicrorotation rate tensor.

    With such a choice of the vector space V of

    the virtual motions, we say that we are dealing with a micromorphic continuum

    of degree 1 .

    The next step is to choose ou r linear application o be specific and to

    stick to a simple case, we shall be satisfied with a first gradient theory. Let us

    note that

    Th e power of the inter nal forces will be written as in (2) with

    p

    a linear combina-

    tion of U i , U i , j , i j x i j kor equivalently of U i , U i , j , i j , i j k :

    But as is an arbitrary sub dom ain of

    S ,

    and

    p

    is independent of 2-see

    footn ote 1-the axio m on intern al forces tells us th at itself mu st remain un-

    changed w hen com pute d in a different frame. Ob viou sly, such a change of frame

    implies that

    U i

    is to be replaced by

    U i U i O i j x j ,

    where

    Di

    and

    O i j

    are a

    vector and a second ord er tensor respectively, both co ns tan t in S. similar change

    is to be applied to U,: ,the velocity field of the subparticle, which leads to the

    conclusion that z i j has to be replaced by x i j Ti i j . As a result. qi j defined by 9 )

    ren~ uins nvariant

    by this change of frame, a qulte natural conclusion because,

    obviously, q . . is the

    relative microcelocity gradient

    an d then is related t o the local

    I

    relative motion of the particle with respect t o the con tinuu m. Then, one must

    have

    K i D i o i j T i i j

    identically at every point of S , which implies that in l o ) ,K i is zero and o i j is

    a

    symmetric tensor.

    Finally, the virtual power of the internal forces in may be written

    s i j x i j v i j k x i j k ) v ,

    or, after an integration by parts.

    J { o i j s i j ) n j U i s i j k x i j n k ) o .

    ?B

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    7/21

    METHO OF V I R T U A L POWER

    56

    The following step is to introduce the virtual power of the external forces

    applied to 2 We can generalize what has been reviewed in 2 by considering

    long range volumic forces with virtual power

    and contact forces with v irtual pow er

    Expressions (12) and (13) are no t as general a s a systematic first gradient theory,

    but will be quite sufficient for the main applications.

    Note that i jis a volumic double force, and M i j a double surface traction,

    both of them including in the general case a symmetric and an antisymmetric

    par t .

    The last step is to apply the principle of virtual power. First assume that

    U i and

    x j

    are chosen in such a way that U i and

    x j

    are zero outside a compact

    subset interior to

    2

    n the sum

    qi qd

    q c only the volume integral re-

    mains. which m ust be zero for any choice of U iand z i j .As an obvious consequence,

    if one assumes that all the quantities which have been written are continuous

    in

    S

    one must have, when putting

    the two equa tions of equilibrium

    It is natural to call z i j the (Cauchy) stress tensor ai j the intrin sic part of tlze

    stress tensor sij the inicrostress tensor vijk he second inicrostress tensor. With this

    partial result one may write

    and , again. as and

    x l

    may take arbitrary values in every point of 2 9 . one

    obtains the bou ndary conditions

    which express the traction

    (stress vector) and the d oub le surface traction M i j

    as linear functions of the unit n orm al n i the linear ap plication so defined being

    the stress tensor and the second microstress tensor respectively.

    These results are summ arized in the following theorem .

    TH OR M stress in a nzicronzorphic inediunl of degre e is. The s ta te o f

    coinpletely defined b y the intrinsic stress tensor aij-a symm etric tensor-the

    microstress tensor s i j and th e second nzicrostress tensor t Ji jk . et f and i jbe the

    zjolunlic force and dou ble for ce ; and M i j tlze su fa ce tract ion and double surface

    traction respectively. Define the stress tensor b y T~~ a ij s i j . Th en t lze equations

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    8/21

    562

    P. GERMAIN

    in S of equilibriuin are giuen b y 15) and (161, the boundary conditions bjl 17) and

    the volunzic energy of stresses by

    where U and

    x

    are the velocity and the gradient of th e relatice velocities of a

    particle and x the second gradient of the relatice uelocities.

    c

    The above results were announced in a previous note Germain 1972)).

    Their development here is much easier than the way previously proposed in the

    literature.

    4

    Dynam ical equa tions for a micromorphic medium of order

    1 Inertia effects

    must now be taken into account. Before giving the convenient definitions for a

    micromorphic medium and the generalized statement of the principle of virtual

    power, it is worthwhile to derive some preliminary results for a homogeneous

    deformation.

    4 1 Homogeneous deformation

    Let us consider

    a

    body V-which later on

    will represent a particle-and call ~ its mass. p its mass density, the position

    of its center of mass M, x/ the position of a point M of V with respect t o its center

    of mass M. Then

    One also introduces a reduced inertia tensor I i j defined by

    In this section, one has to distinguish between real kinematic concepts and their

    virtual counterparts; the latter will be denoted with

    a

    A-for example, U i is the

    real velocity of M, Qi is the virtual velocity of

    M,

    U i is the real velocity of

    M ,

    ;

    the virtual velocity of M .

    It is assumed that

    any tiine

    the velocity field on

    V

    is defined by 81, where

    z i j

    is independent of the xl Accordingly, the vector space of virtual motions is

    defined by a vector and a second order tensor tijn such a way that the virtual

    velocity field of the body V is given by

    The real) acceleration field of V is given by

    where a dot means the time derivative material derivative, more precisely) and

    where

    y i

    ui is the acceleration of the center of mass

    M.

    But i Is the relative

    velocity of a point

    M

    with respect to the frame of the center of mass M and then,

    as i I U j U j one may write

    Now, the kinetic energy of

    V,

    the virtual power of mass-velocity or of momentum

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    9/21

    563E T H O D

    OF

    V I R T U A L

    POW R

    of

    V,

    and the virtual power of mass-acceleration of

    V

    are given respectively by

    Thu s, a straightforward calculation show s the following result.

    L E M M A

    The quantities

    k . j? j?

    defined

    b y

    ( 2 3 ) , 2 4 ) ,and (2 5) are gicen

    b y

    with

    It is also easy to prove the next lemm a.

    LEMMA. W he n t varies, then

    ( 3 0 )

    ' i j

    XipIpj XjpIpi.

    For , as / i is a constan t, one has by de rivation of ( 2 0 ) :

    p ' ( x y ;

    ~ i j c ; )du'

    p ( i l j p x : x b x ~ , x ~ x ~ )u

    4 2 Dynamics

    of

    a micromorphic medium

    As in previous sections, but here

    with different not atio ns, a virtual mo tion of suc h a me dium will be defined

    by the two fields

    oi

    a n d

    j

    oth functions of the point x i in

    S

    at a given time.

    Th e inertia properties ar e defined by the m ass density and the field of the reduce d

    particle inertia tensor I i j given by ( 2 0 ) .Con serva tion of mass implies, for the real

    mo tion (see in particular ( 3 0 ) ):

    0 ,

    I

    j P p l

    31)

    i J l l p P j ;C I

    Note that the mass of a volume A ( M ) around M , small with respect to the

    dime nsion s of S , but large with respect to the particle size, is approximately given

    by

    l'(M)AV Pi,

    where Au is the volume of A ( M ) ,and is the mass of the (great numbe r of) par-

    ticles included in A ( M ) .With this rem ark, it is clear that one is led to the following

    definitions :

    Kinetic energy

    of S :

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    10/21

    564 P G E R M A I N

    Vir tua l power of mass zjelocity of S

    (33)

    .qK

    Jsp i K

    da

    Jsp ( O i ~ i

    dv 2ijiipIpj

    Virtu al power of m ass acceleration of S :

    (34)

    . A =

    Js

    l a i i i ; . ip~pj

    sP ( ~ i 7 i

    d v .

    Ob viou sly, similar definitions ma y be given for any subd om ain of S. Let us

    denote by V the real velocity field (defined by Ui a n d z j on S) and the real

    accele ration field (defined by y and y j on S-the accele ration an d microaccelera-

    tion) and by p the v irtual velocity fie ld; then .gKs a symmetric bilinear form of

    V an d ?-say 2-and on e ma y write

    Moreover, it is possible to differentiate

    gK

    with respect to time, provided we

    supplement the definition of virtual motion with the following precision: the

    zjirtual moti on of each point of the syst em is a uniform translation. For a micro-

    morph ic medium, this means that the mo tion of each point M of any particle

    P (M ) is a uniform translation. Thus, one must have

    a n d , a s i S

    U j x j k x ; , for any point M of P ( M ) ,one m ust write

    As a consequence, one can state the following lem ma .

    LEMMA.

    Diferentiation of

    a

    virtual veloc ity field must be compute(1 with

    the following formulas

    With such a result one may relate ,, to K .

    LEMMA. If all the quant ities inzjolved are continuously dif ere nti abl e on S,

    then

    The proof is quite eas y; s tart ing with (33 ), one has just to co mpu te

    using (36 ), (30) an d of course the symm etry of I i j .

    It is time now to recall the statem ent of the principle of virtual powe r when

    dynamical effects have to be taken into a ccount.

    Principle of zjirtual power

    (dynamics) .

    Let a sys tem

    S

    be in motion with respect

    to a gicen Galilean p a m e ; at any time , and for any virtual motion, the material

    derivative of the virtual power of mass-zjelocity of S is equal to the zjirtual power

    of all th e internal forces and extern al forces actin g on S.

    Disregarding first the case when discontinuities exist on S, using Lemma 4

    one immediately obtains the following theorem.

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    11/21

    565

    ETHOD OF V I R T U A L POWER

    THEOREM the dynanzics of inicronlorphic med ium of. T h e equations of a

    degree

    1

    are obtained b y replacing, in tlze equations of the statics (see The orem

    I ) ,

    f i by

    i

    pyi Yi b y Yij pyiplPj where

    y i

    and

    y i j

    are the acceleration and the

    nzicroacceleration of a particle (tlze latter be ing given by

    29)).

    It is obviously quite easy to supplement Theorem 2 with the statement

    giving the jump relations ac ross an y surface of discontinuity. If C is the surface

    across which discon tinuities may arise, W the velocity of a point of C, V U W

    the relative velocity of the medium with respect to C, one know s tha t

    where

    v

    is the norm al co mpon ent of V with respect to C ),

    [ h ]

    the jump of

    h

    across

    C

    provided that

    p

    an d are piecewise continuo usly differentiable in

    S .

    By con-

    servation of mass, it is seen that m pv is con tinuo us across C. Then by classical

    reasoning, the following theorem is obtained see, for instance, Ge rm ain 1973b)).

    TH EO RE M. f

    in pv is the mass flux dens ity across an y discontinuity

    sullface

    C,

    then

    4 3

    Energy

    equation The problem is to give significance to the concepts

    involved in the classical statement of the first principle of thermodynamics: the

    inaterial derizjative of th e total ener gy of a systein is the suin of the power of ext ern al

    forces actin g on this systein and of the rate of heat supplied into S-say

    Q.

    Assuming the total energy to be the sum of the kinetic energy

    K

    and the

    inter nal energ y E-this lat ter being defined by a specific int er na l ene rgy e-one

    may write

    B + R = q * + q c + Q .

    But th e theorem of energy in dym amics , i .e., the statem ent of the principle of

    virtual power applied w ith the real mot ion, gives

    and then one ob tains

    If, as usual, we app ly this result to a subsyste m of S and write

    ( r

    the rate of volumic heat,

    q ,

    the heat flow ve ctor), we can derive. by the applica-

    tion of the divergence theorem and the introduction of the expression of .qi

    given in 3,

    It is outside the scope of the present paper to put more emphasis on this result

    an d to continue the theory to considerations of constitutive relations-for this.

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    12/21

    66

    P. G E R M A I N

    the reader is referred t o the literature an d, in particular, t o the pape rs of Eringen

    an d his cowo rkers. We w ant only to point o ut the advan tage of the present method

    which, starting directly with th e expression of the r ate of energy of intern al forces,

    leads immediately t o the expression

    4 0 )

    of the equation of energy

    3 9 ) .

    5 General micromorphic medium In the last two sections a new method has

    been proposed in order to derive quite simply results which were obtained pre-

    viously by different and, according to the author's opinion, more complicated

    methods. This theory for the time being is rich enough to fit various physical

    situations. The principal difficulty indeed is to discover the practical significance

    of some of the concepts which have been in trodu ced, to design a metho d in order

    to exhibit their physical validity i f any

    ),

    and to measure them in some specific

    physical situations. Thus, the generalization proposed in this section is not given

    with the idea of providing a new schematization which can be used at the present

    time, but just for the sake of showing the possibilities of the method and for

    eventual further comparisons with other theories which may be found in the

    literature.

    5 1 Statics Starting again with the model of a continuum with a micro-

    structure. a natural generalization is to describe more accurately the relative

    motion of the particle with respect to its center of mass by replacing

    (8)

    by a

    finite or infinite expansion

    W e begin here with the formal

    the or.^,

    when the full infinite expansion is written.

    Without loss of generality, the zijk1may be assumed to be fully symmetric with

    respect to the indices

    j

    k,

    I

    As in

    3,

    a virtual motion is defined here by a sequence of fields

    W riting the power of intern al forces as in

    2 ) ,

    and restricting ourselves to a

    first gradient theor y, on e is led to define p by

    where

    As above,

    ai j

    s sy mm etric; without loss of generality, the various tens ors which

    have been introduced in order to describe the state of stress may be assumed

    to satisfy som e symm etry properties-for instance, sijk vijk are symmetric with

    respect to the indices and

    k.

    Note also that definition

    42 )

    fulfills the cond ition

    arising from the axi.om of virtual power of internal forces.

    Similarly, form ulas

    12 )

    and

    13 )

    have to be generalized by

    43 )

    .qu J U i

    + Yijl i j

    Yijkzijk

    ) da

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    13/21

    567

    E T H O D

    OF V I R T U A L POWER

    Note again that, for instance, Y a n d M,,, are symmetric with respect to the

    indices j and k. Introducing the stress tensor T , , by 14), one gets by application

    of the principle of virtual work the equations of equ ilibrium for the general nzicro-

    inorphic medium

    5 2

    Dynamics

    If one wants to take into account the m otion of the system.

    one has again to distinguish between the real motion defined by V : U i ,

    x i j

    an d a virtual motion which will be denoted by

    = o i ,Z i j ,

    It is not difficult

    to generalize the above analysis of

    5 ,

    even i the final expressions are evidently

    more involved.

    In order to describe inertia properties of the medium, one must introduce

    the generalized reduced inertia ten sors

    I i j , i j k ,

    j k lully symm etric with respect

    to their indices) an d defined for any particle

    V =

    P M) by form ulas generalizing

    20), such that

    It is not difficult to generalize 30) also . Th e result may be w ritten

    if on e introduce s the following no tatio n :

    Note that formulas

    19)

    are still valid. Accordingly, differentiation with respect

    to time gives the following identity becaus e

    ;

    = Ui Uj) which is satisfied by

    the real mo tion lr

    In wh at follows, it will be assum ed also th at the virtual mo tion satisfies the

    same relation ~ 90.

    The kinetic energy is still a qu ad ra tic form of V-say 2K

    =

    2 V ,V t

    w he re 2 9 , V ) is the expre ssion of the virtual pow er of mass velocity of S , a

    bilinear symmetric form which may be expressed with the inertia components

    I,,, Th e inte gran d of 24) is

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    14/21

    568 P

    GERMAIN

    andthenwemaywrite

    The t e rms in side the braces-say ;,-may a l so bewr i tt en a s

    r -

    with

    Th eabo veresultgivesthe generalization of(33)an dconse quen tlyof( 32).

    W enow have to dea l with acce le rat ions . F i rs t we ob ta in the general iza t ion

    of(22)bydifferentiationof(41)

    :

    L

    3C

    . .

    X

    n l x i j k . . . l ( ? ~ ~ ~

    ;

    =

    y i

    i i j k . . . I ~ j

    -~;)(jk . . . l) ,

    m = l i j m= 1

    if one u s es no ta t ion (48 ), t ak ing a ccoun t of th e s ymme try w i th r espect to th e

    indices j, k. . , I But

    x j , . . . s ~ ~

    53)

    =

    u j

    - u j =

    , , S

    rn' = 1

    Then,wemaywrite

    7,'= 7 7rJk lSJXk . .

    X;

    (54)

    8 ,

    n t = 1

    with

    For ins tance, for the microaccelerationtensorof lowerorderonegets

    Thegeneralizationof(28)iseasilywritten

    (57)

    with

    (58)

    rip q ijljp...q

    j ijkljkp...q

    Finallytheformulawhichreplaces(34)is

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    15/21

    569ETHO OF

    V I R T U A L

    POW R

    if we denote by d the set of acceleration fields y

    q .

    It is essential for

    a later application of conservation of energy) to check that

    for reul moti ons, the

    pon.er of muss uccelerution is tlze time derivutive of tlze kinetic ene rg y:

    d

    d V ,d

    =

    - i 2 ~ , ) )

    dt

    For this purpose it is interesting to give an alternative expression for Tip . . .

    Going back to 52), 53) an d introducing

    7;

    directly in 25), one obtains 57) with

    a n d

    Ajk . . . l p . . .qn l [x ja l

    k . . . l p . . q

    ](jk...l) .

    Th e left-hand side of 60) con tains

    a) terms like

    whos e sum gives the term s of the right-h and side of 60) when th e coefficients

    I in are taken as con stan ts;

    b) terms like

    But it is easily checked th at, according to 47) an d the p roperties of symmetry

    with respect t o th e indices,

    an d these term s give the other terms in 60), i .e., those w hich are obtained by

    material derivatives of the coefficients I .

    A

    sinzilur calculution showss thut Lenlmu 4

    1s still vulid.

    Let the virtual motion of each point of the system be a uniform translation,

    on e may first generalize 36). Differentiation of a virtual velocity field must be

    comp uted with the following formulas see 56) above)

    :

    After all these prelimina ries of kinetics, it is easy to get the final result by a pplic a-

    tion of the principle of virtual work see the statem ent of 4.2). Th e conclusions

    are given in the following theorem.

    TH OR M

    .

    T h e equutions of statics of u general m icromorphic nlediunz ure

    given by 45). T h e equations of dynunlics ure obtuined by replacing

    f

    bjl f

    pyi

    uizd the

    Yi j . , . k

    y

    Yi j . . .k- p r i j . . , k ,

    lzere ma y be expressed in term s of the ucceleru-

    tion fields and the velocity jields und its deriv atice s)

    by 58)

    und

    5 6 t o r 55).

    http:///reader/full/Ajk...lp..http:///reader/full/ak...lp.,http:///reader/full/ak...lp.,http:///reader/full/ak...lp.,http:///reader/full/Ajk...lp..
  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    16/21

    570

    P G E R M A I N

    This general theory is quite formal. For the applications, expansion (41)

    may be reduced to the first

    n

    + 1 terms-and the theory obtained in this way

    will be relative to nzicronlorphic medium of order n. For instance, for

    n

    3, is

    described by

    U i ,

    x i j , x i j k ,

    i j k l ;

    he state of stresses by

    a i j , i j , s i j k , i j k l , i j k ,

    i j k l ,

    vij,,,,: long range forces by f Y i j i j k i j k l;nd generalized surface traction

    by T M i j ,M i j , , M i j , , . On ly the first four lines of (45) have to be w ritten for equ i-

    librium. As far as inertia forces are concerned, we keep y i , r i p , i p q ,ipqrnly.

    It would not be difficult to write the jump relations and the energy equation.

    This m atter is left to the reader.

    6 Micropolar medium and other particular cases

    6 1

    Micropolar medium very interesting particular case is obtained when

    assuming that the particle

    P

    ( M ) of the continuum moves as a rigid body. Th e

    virtual motioils which will be considered will also be assumed to udlzere to this

    condition. In this case, the micromorphic medium is necessurily of order 1, und tlze

    tensor

    z i j

    is antisymmet~ic .As a consequence, x i j , is also antisymmetric with

    respect to the indices

    i

    a n d j (see (9)) .

    Going back to 4 and putt ing T~~ = o i j

    +

    s i j ,as in (14 ), (10) may be w ritten

    P = K i U i + T ~ ~ U ~ , ~i j x i j+ 11,'11

    x

    and without loss of generality,

    s i j

    and

    v i j ,

    may be assumed to be antisymmetric

    with respect to the indices i and j As p is invariant, by superposition of a rigid

    body velocity field, one must have for any constant Di and Rij

    - a J i :

    then

    K i

    0 and

    o i j

    is symm etric. As a result,

    the tensor s ij is nothing else than the

    antisynlnzetric purt of tlze stress teilsor z i j

    Similarly, in (12) an d (13),

    Y i j

    and

    M i j

    may be assumed, without loss of generality, antisymmetric with respect to i a n d

    j :

    they define the long range volumic couple distribution and surface couple stress

    respectively. Again in .qA-see (34)-one has only to consider the antisym me tric

    part of

    T i j

    =

    y i p l P j ,

    say

    T I i j l .

    The equations of motion and boundary conditions

    for a micropolar medium may then be w ritten

    f + 7 . . =

    p q b .

    L J J

    J . J .

    r'

    T T ,

    .n .

    11 =

    1 1 k k .

    ~ijl

    +

    t ' i j k , k Y i j= p T L i j l ,

    M . . n

    It is obviously easy t o get a m ore classical description when one introduces

    the adjoint tensors with respect to the indices i and j P u t

    7 . .

    =

    - . .

    7

    I1

    , ] ,

    ,,

    M i ,

    -

    2 i l k

    M

    ,,

    Y i j k

    -L

    i j k

    Y

    k

    (62)

    Then,

    As only the antisymmetric parts of K i j and T i jplay a role, one may introduce

    and then

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    17/21

    METH O D O F V I R TU A L PO WER

    if on e introduce s the inertia tensor

    Th e interpretation is quite easy :

    x

    is a vector rotation rate,

    M,

    and

    Y,

    are couple

    densities,

    v i j

    the couple stress density, o the spin. The last line of 61) may then

    be written

    and the volumic kinetic energy is

    Then, one recovers the main result given in the paper of Kafadar and Eringen

    1971), in which m any q uite interesting interpretations and applications can be

    found.

    6 2

    Second gradient theory The second gradient theory may be obtained

    very easily from the theo ry of mic rom orph ic m edia of order 1 when on e assumes

    that the particle is subject to the same deform ation a s the general continu um , i.e.,

    Let us investigate briefly the consequences of such an assumption. It will be

    sufficient to use virtual motions which satisfy the condition 68 s a y 2 i ,:,.

    The equa tions of 5

    3

    and 4 have been obtained by writing, for any subdo main

    relation such tha t

    is valid whatever be the fields

    O

    4 . In the present case these two fields are no

    longer independent: in order to apply the principle of virtual work, one must

    write the left-hand side of 69) in such a way tha t only indepen dent quan tities

    related to the virtual motions appear. First, one obtains easily for the volume

    integral,

    A,s the volum e inte gral mus t be zero w hatever the value of

    i

    ne gets first the equa -

    tion

    A

    Bij,j

    0.

    If one assum es equilibrium, this volum e integral comes from

    qd

    .?,,,

    and one has

    A = f + o . . + s . .

    r 11 11

    B . . = y . . + s . . + v i j k , , :

    1 11 L

    and writing

    one gets

    2)

    i

    + T i j j 0.

    Th e term sijdisappears, as is quite clear when one looks at

    1

    1) taking account of

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    18/21

    (68). Intr insic stresses are defined by the symmetric tensor o i j an d the tensor ui jk,

    symmetr ic wi th respect to an d

    k.

    No w consider the term in th e surface integral of (69) ar ising from

    which

    is given by (13). Let us introduce, following Mind lin, the n otat ion DK i an d DjKi

    for wr it ing the no rmal derivat ive o n 2 9 of the vector f ie ld K i and i t s t angentia l

    d er iv at iv es o n 2 9

    O n 2 9 ,

    i

    a n d O^ may be chosen independently , but DjO i may be computed

    from th e values of

    i

    o n 2 9 . Th en

    ;2.l.o.

    J 1 1

    ( : ~ l , , f r , ) , ~

    M , ~ , ~ @ ,

    Dj(h l i jO i )

    r 2 . 1 i j n j ~ o i ( D ~ M ~ ~ ) ~ , .

    The divergence theorem for an open subdom ain C of 2 2 gives

    where

    t

    is the uni t tangent vector to 2C an d v

    ~ t n

    the uni t normal vector

    to ZC, tangent to 2 9 . Then

    Here,

    is a ridge, i.e., a line on

    2 9

    if any) where the tangent p lane of 2 9 s d is -

    continuous. The only tract ion elements which may be defined on 2 9 n terms of

    the stress tensors are the n:

    (i) a surface traction

    r

    DjMij (Dkn, )Mi jnj ,

    ( i i) a norm al dou ble t ract ion Ri Mijn j ,

    (iii) eventually a line traction

    W i

    [[Mij\tj],

    a n d

    Finally, making a similar transformation for the other terms of the surface

    integral of (69) arising from

    4

    4 .

    nd taking into a ccou nt the surface integral

    of (70), one gets the boun dary condit ion o n an y surface

    2 8 :

    which, with the f ield eq uat ion s

    (71)

    an d (72), form a com plete set of equa tions of

    equilibriu m for the second g radien t theo ry (see M indlin an d Eshel (1968)) fully

    equivalent to the system given by Germain (1973).

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    19/21

    573ETHO OF V I R T U A L

    POWER

    he equution of motion ma y be derived b y applicutioil of heo rem

    2. This last

    statemen t show s the significance of the extra inertia term s on e has to in troduce in

    the dynamical equa t ion.

    6 3

    Indeterminate couple stress theory This model ca n be viewed as a micro-

    polar m edium subjected to the constraint

    The particle has a rotation motion which is exactly the rotation of the general

    cont inuum. In order to obtain the corresponding equat ions, one can star t again

    wi th (69) and assume tha t e i ther f i j fi i jwith the same B i j and Fijo r f i j o i , j ,

    as in the preceding subsection, but by keeping only the antisymmetric parts of

    B i j and Fij This last poin t of view leads immediately to th e results we are loo king

    for. Using the not ation (62), (71) an d (72) are replaced by

    ? . . =

    IJ r j i j l Ik .k i j k y k 3

    (77)

    f + z s 0 .

    O n t he o t he r hand , v i j k is ant isymmetric with respect to an d k. Th us (73) reduces to

    (78)

    ;

    zijnj i i j lDj ( ~lk nk) .

    Th e r ight-hand side of (74) is zero. Then 2Ni -ci jkMknj 0. Th e couple M i

    is then nor ma l to an d its intensity is fully indeterm inate: it plays n o role when

    one writes .?,,,which reduces to the pow er of the surface tractio ns T-at least

    if there is no ridge o n 2 . Th en (77) an d (78) are the m ain eq uations of this theory

    which has many applications-see, for instance, Min dlin and Tiersten (1962).

    The relation of this theory with the micropolar theory has been previously

    emphasized in Eringen (1966a), (1966 b). Of course the theories of 6.1 an d 6.3

    originate in the famoh s work of the Cosserat bro thers (1909).

    6 4

    Microstructure without microstresses Looking back again to a micro-

    morphic medium, one may assume that the relat ive motion of the part icles is

    possible without an y expense of energy. In fact,

    i f

    one assumes v j k 0 in (10) an d

    Y ij 0 in (12) , 16) shows that also si j 0 an d thus we recover the classical theory

    where z i j a i j defines completely the state of stress. Nevertheless, the parameters

    which define the o rientation of the particle,

    i f

    they d o not appea r in the equations

    of equilibrium, may be present in the definition of the specific internal energy,

    an d consequently in the constitutive equation s. They then play the role of hidden

    param eters. Such a m odel h as recently been considered by M and el (1971) in its

    general th eor y of viscoplasticity.

    7

    Comparison with other work We conclude this paper with a few remarks

    dealing with the comparison of the present work with other theories presented

    in the li terature.

    The theory of micromorphic media of order one has been extensively con-

    sidered by Eringen an d his cowo rkers. Th e results of

    3 and 4 are then no t new,

    but the method which is proposed seems to be original and is , in the author 's

    opinion , simpler than the me thods which have been prop osed so far. This is why

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    20/21

    574

    P

    G E R M A I N

    it has been possible to develop the general theory of 5 which, to the autho r's

    knowledge, is completely new.

    Mention must be made at this stage of another generalizaticsn proposed by

    Eringen (1968) an d (1970) under the title,

    Micronzorplzic coiztinuum

    of

    higher grades

    Eringen has proposed to obtain the results of 4 an d 5 by a meth od of surface

    and volume averages on the basic concepts valid at the microscopic level. The

    generalization is obtained formally by taking higher moments in this process of

    averaging. Th e present auth or must confess that , in the present s i tuation. the

    physical significance of such a form ulation is no t clear to him. Th e basic kinematics

    of the particle is still given by (8 ); how then is it possible to introduce a description

    of stresses which apparen tly is mo re refined th an th e one given in 3 which is

    based on the fundamental duali ty between the kinematical description and the

    description of stress? What is the significance of the various micro-energies which

    are intro duced ? At first glance, at least, they seem to h ave n o direct relation with

    the usual stateme nt of the first principle of therm odyn amics. If such a refinement

    is worth being considered, what would be i ts coun terpart in the classical continu um

    theory? These are som e of the questions which rem ain, until n ow, without answer,

    an d which seem necessary to elucidate before such a theory ma y be accepted and

    used for the description of physical situations.

    We no w w ant t o com men t on a very interesting n ote by G reen (1965) which

    intends to establish the connection between the micromorphic theory of order

    one and the theories of multipolar continuum introduced by Green and Rivlin

    (1964a, b) an d (196 5). Th e startin g poin t of these theories is quite similar to th e

    one o n which the present paper is based (desp ite som e difference in the wo rds

    used for describing the same concepts) generalized forces ar e introdu ced by their

    power for a given kinematical description. Nevertheless these au tho rs d o not

    apply th e principle of virtual power, bu t instead , an d m ore simply, the first principle

    of thermodynamics or the equation of energy. supplemented by a condition of

    invariance under superpo sed rigid body motions. When applied to th e classical

    continu um m echanics, this meth od provides at the sam e time the three s tatements

    of conservation of mass, mom entum an d energy. Wh en applied to a m ore complex

    situation, this method does not give the same results as the method of virtual

    po w er: obviously th e num ber of equation s obtained by the former is less tha n the

    num ber obtain ed by the latter. Mor e precisely, in case of micromorphic media,

    the last condition (17) is included in an oth er on e in which he at flow concep ts are

    present as well as double surface traction

    M i j

    and the microstress tensor v jk

    Thi s difference app ears still m ore clearly w hen lookin g, for instance, at the p aper

    of Green an d Rivlin (1964a) devote d to w hat is called in th e present terminology

    theory of the second an d higher gradients . If long range forces an d generalized

    surface tractions are essentially those introduced here, the generalized stresses

    are different and consequently the basic dynamics equations are different and

    moreover less in num ber. Of course the number of equatio ns which ar e missing are

    supplem ented by a greater num ber of constitutiv e equations-for instance. when

    the m aterial is assumed t o be elastic. There is no reason to suspect this theory to

    be inconsistent, but the present author does not know if statements of existence,

    uniqueness an d v ariational formulations can be established a s has been d one for

    the second gradient theory (Ge rmain (1973a)).A further study of these questions

  • 8/11/2019 Germain VirtualPower

    21/21

    575ETHOD OF V IRTUAL POWER

    an da mo reextendedanalysisof thephysical significanceof thetheory of Gree n

    andRivlinincomparisonwiththenthgradienttheorywouldbeveryvaluable.

    finalremarkontheworkofGreenandRivlinisrelatedtotheiruseofthe

    tetra hed ronargumentwhichtheysystematicallyapp lyinord erto relategeneralized

    surfacetractionswithgeneralizedstresstensors.Itisnotclearthatsucha nargu-

    mentmaybesafelyappliedwhenhighorderderivativesareinvolved,ashasbeen

    shownindetailintheabovequotedpaperonsecondgradienttheory.

    REFERENCES

    P . BREUNEVAL1973),Principe des travaux virtuels et equations des coques, Mecanique , to appear .

    P.CASAL1972),

    La thdorie du second gradient et la capillarite,

    C.R.Acad.Sci. ParisSer.A,274,pp.

    1571-1574.

    E.COSSERAT (1909), Theorie des corps deformables, Hermann, Par is . ND F COSSERAT

    A. C . ERINGEN

    ND

    E .S. SUHUBI1964),

    Nonlinear theory o fsi mp le m icroelastic solids,

    Internat.

    J

    Engrg.Sc i . ,2 , pp. 189-203, 38 94 04 .

    A. C . ERINGEN1966a),

    Linear theory of micropolar elasticity , J

    Math.Mech., 15,pp.909-924.

    (1966b), Theory of micropolar f luids, Ibid ., 16,pp. 1-18.

    (1968),

    Mechanics of micromorphic continua,

    Mechanicsof Genera l izedCont inua , IUTAM

    Symposium,E.Kro ner, ed .,Springer-V erlag,Berlin,p. 18-35.

    (1970a),

    Mechanics ofmicropo lar continua,

    ContributionstoMechanics,Dabir, ed., Pergamon

    Press,Oxford,pp.23-40.

    (1970b),Balance laws of micromorphic mechanics, Internat. J Engrg.Sci.,8,pp.819-828.

    P. GE RM AIN1972),

    Sur I application de la methode des puissances virtuelles en mecanique des milieux

    continus, C. R. Acad.Sci. ParisS r . A,274,pp. 1051-1055.

    (1973a),

    La metho de des puissances virtuelles en mecaniq ue des mili eux continus-1Pre Partie,

    Theorie du second gradient,

    J

    Mecan ique, 12,pp.235-274.

    (1973b),

    Cours de mecanique des milieux continus,

    Tome1,Masson,Paris.

    A . E . GREEN

    ND

    R. S . R IVL IN 1964a), Simple force and stress multipoles, Arch . Ra t i ona l Mech.

    Anal.,16,pp.325-353.

    (1964b),Multipolar continuum mechanics, Ibid.,17,pp.113-147.

    (1965),Multipolar continuum mechanics: unctional theory, Proc . Roy. Soc . Ser . A, 284, pp.

    303-324.

    A . E. GREEN1965) , Micro-materials and multipolar continuum mechanics, Internat. J Engrg. Sci. ,

    3,pp.533-537.

    C . B . KAFADAR

    ND

    A . C . ER INGEN 1971),Micropo lar media-The classical theo ry, Ibid . , 9 , pp.

    271-305.

    J . MANDEL1971) , Plusticite classique et viscoplasticite, Cou rs a u C . I .S .M . , Udi ne , Ed it io ns du

    C.I .S.M.

    R .

    D.

    MI ND LIN1964),Microstructure in linear elasticity, Arch.RationalMech.Anal., 16,pp.51-78.

    R . D . M INDL IN ND H . F TIERSTEN1962),Effects of couple-stresses in linear elasticity, Ibid . , 11,

    pp . 415448 .

    R . D . MINDLIN

    ND

    N .N .E SHEL1968),

    O n j r s t strain gradient theories in linear elasticity,

    Internat.

    J.

    SolidsSt ru ct., 4,pp. 109-124.

    R . A . TOUPIN 1964), Theory o f elasticity with couple-stress, Arch . Ra t i onal Mech . Ana l ., 17, pp .

    85-1 12.