GEOPHYS RPT - WHISTLE LAKE E PROJECT - Ontario are compared in a bridge ratiometer circuit, ... and...
Transcript of GEOPHYS RPT - WHISTLE LAKE E PROJECT - Ontario are compared in a bridge ratiometer circuit, ... and...
OntarioMinistry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ministers duDevetoppement du Nord et des Mines
January 9, 1995
Geoscience Approvals Section 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5
Telephone: (705) 670-5853 Fax: (705) 670-5863
Our File: 2.15702 Transaction /: H9480.00537
Mining Recorder Ministry of Northern Development 6 Mines 4 Government Road East Kirkland Lake, Ontario P2N 1A2
Dear Sir/Madam:
Subject: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS OH MINING CLAIM L1200828 IH LEBEL TOWNSHIP
Assessment work credits have been approved as outlined on the report of work form for the submission. The credits have been approved under Section 14 (Geophysical) of the Mining Act Regulations.
The approval date is January 04, 1995.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steven Beneteau at (705) 670-5855.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:
Yours sincerely,
Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section Mining and Land Management Branch Mines and Minerals Division
SBB/dl
cc: Resident GeologistKirkland Lake, Ontario
Assessment Files Library Sudbury, Ontario
/
S2H06SW0019 2.1S693 WABIKON LAKE 010
RECEIVED
MOV 8 1994
MINING LANDS BRANCH
GEOPHYSICAL
REPORT
j 2.15393
WHISTLE LAKE EAST PROJECT
NTS 52-H-6
BY: PHANTOM EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD. 103-79 NORTH COURT STREET THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO P7A 4T7 SEPTEMBER, 1994
S2H06SWD019 2.15693 WABIKON LAKE 01OC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION...................................1
GRIDING,LOCATION AND ACCESS....................1
LIST OF CLAIMS.................................2
PROPERTY GEOLOGY...............................2
THEORY OF OPERATION............................2
SURVEY PROCEDURE...............................5
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS..........................6
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS................7
MAPS INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT
PROTON MAGNETOMETER.......................1:2500
MAXMIN PROFILES 444 HZ....................1:2500
MAXMIN PROFILES 1777 HZ...................1:2500
INTRODUCTION
During the fall of 1994, Phantom Exploration
Services of Thunder Bay, Ontario was contracted by
Cumberland Resources Ltd. of Thunder Bay, Ontario to cut a
grid on their Whistle Lake East Project and subsequently, to
complete MaxMin II+ and proton magnetometer geophysical
surveys on the grid. The property consists of 76 unpatented
mining claims containing 96 units numbered TB 1082884-899
inclusive, TB 1083000-003 inclusive, TB 1083035-036
inclusive, TB 1083041-070 inclusive, TB 1083073-082
inclusive, TB 1083084-092 inclusive, TB 1195981, TB 1088209-
210 inclusive and TB 1209446-447 inclusive which are located
in the Thunder Bay Mining Division.
GRIDING. LOCATION AND ACCESS
Approximately 28.6 kilometres of line were
cut, chained and picketed at 25 metre intervals. The
baseline was orientated east-west and the grid lines were
cut perpendicular to it at 100 metre intervals. The line
cutting was completed by Timmins North Exploration Services
of Timmins, Ontario while the geophysical surveys were
carried out by Phantom Exploration Services Ltd.
The property is located about 100 kilometres due
north of Thunder Bay, Ontario and about 4km east of Highway
#527. Access is provided to the general area by highways
til/417 and #527. At a point about 100 kilometres north of
1
junction of these two highways, access is gained by
travelling (5km) north and east on old logging roads to the
survey area.
CLAIMS COVERED BY THIS REPORT
TB 1082886 TB 1082887 TB 1082888
TB 1082889 TB 1082890 TB 1082891
TB 1082896 TB 1082897 TB 1082898
TB 1082899 TB 1083000 TB 1083001
TB 1083064 TB 1083065 TB 1083076
TB 1083077 TB 1083078 TB 1209446
PROPERTY GEOLOGY
The property is underlain by an east-west trending
sequence of volcanic rocks which are capped by a diabase
sill. This sill, which in general thickens to the east, is
relatively thin in the survey area and in some areas is
completely removed. The volcanics exposed in these windows
are for the most part felsic in composition and exhibit
zones of alteration associated with varying amounts of
sulphides consisting of mainly pyrite and pyrrhotite.
A relatively thin, flat lying, fine grained, white
recrystallized dolomitic limestone is closely associated
spatially with the diabase sill.
THEORY OF OPERATION
The Proton Magnetometer
The proton precession magnetometer is so named
because it utilizes the precession of spinning protons or
nuclei of the hydrogen atom in a sample of hydrocarbon fluid
(kerosene) to measure the total magnetic field intensity.
The spinning protons behave as small, spinning
magnetic dipoles. These magnets are temporarily polarized by
application of a uniform magnetic field generated by a
current in a coil of wire. When the current is removed, the
spin of the protons causes them to precess about the '
direction of the earth's ambient magnetic field. The
precessing protons then generate a small magnetic signal
whose frequency is precisely proportional to the total
magnetic field intensity and independent of the orientation
of the coil (sensor). The proportionality which relates
frequency to the field intensity is called the gyromagnetic
ratio of the proton. The precession frequency, typically
2000 Hz, is measured as the absolute value of the total
magnetic field intensity with an accuracy of 0.1 gamma.
The total magnetic intensity, as measured by the
proton magnetometer is the magnitude of the earth's field
vector which is independent of its direction. The
measurement can be expressed as a length (50,000 gammas) of
the earth's field vector. A local disturbance, say 10
gammas, would add or subtract to the undisturbed field of
50,000 gammas in the usual manner of vector addition. Since
the proton magnetometer measures only the magnitude of the
resultant vector, (whose direction is almost parallel to the
undisturbed total field vector) that which is measured is
very nearly the component of the disturbance vector. Thus
the change in the total field intensity is called the
anomaly.
The Max Min II+
Since the horizontal loop E.M. system is maximum
coupled, measurement at the receiver is most conveniently
made in terms of the ratios of the in phase and out of phase
voltages induced in a reference coil. The reference coil is
mounted directly on the transmitting coil in the orientation
of the maximum coupling. The reference and the receiver
voltage are compared in a bridge ratiometer circuit, the
output of which is displayed on the in and out of phase
meters. These meters will read zero when the signal is
entirely due to the primary field and its phase shift is
ninety degrees (i.e. no E.M. anomaly present). When readings
are taken in the vicinity of a conductor, the in phase and
the out of phase components of the secondary field are
measured as a percentage of the primary field intensity and
phase at the receiver.
SURVEY PROCEDURE
The Max Min II+
The equipment used for this survey was a Max Min
II+ manufactured by Apex Parametrics Limited of Uxbridge,
Ontario. The survey was conducted using the in-line array,
with coplanar coils moving in tandem along survey lines
orientated perpendicular to the geologic strike. The
horizontal separation between the coils is kept constant by
means of accurate secant chaining of the lines. A continuous
inclinometer survey is carried out by the receiver operator
as he travels from station to station. By simple arithmetic
averaging, the percentage slope (tilt) between coils can be
calculated and thus any errors due to elevation differences
between the transmitter and the receiver can be eliminated
by using the tiltmeter to keep the coils coplanar. Both in
and out of pase readings were taken at 25 meter intervals
along the survey lines for two frequencies ( 1777Hz and 444
Hz). These readings are plotted at mid point between the
transmitter and the receiver.
The Proton Magnetometer
The proton magnetometer survey was conducted using
a EDA OMNI IV magnetometer. The total field was read with a
resolution of one gamma and the data was corrected for
diurnal variations using another OMNI IV magnetometer in the
base station mode. Data was collected at 25 metre intervals
along the grid lines.
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
The Proton Magnetometer Survey
The survey area is presented in plan form at a
scale of 1:2500. The corrected magnetic data is plotted on
this map and contoured at 250 gamma intervals.
While the data does not exhibit any strong regional
gradient, it does outline a fairly well defined northwest
southeast regional trend east of line 19+OOE. This trend
consists of two broad magnetic lows separated by a broad
magnetic high. Closely associated magnetic highs and lows
such as are located on line 22+OOE at about 5+OON are'due to
dipole effects. The magnetic features outlined by the survey
are due almost entirely to the diabase sill. The magnetic
differences noted within the diabase (i.e. both broad highs
and lows) may be due to different phases within the diabase
sill itself or possibly due to two different sills that may
have been emplaced during different magnetic reversal
periods. The relatively magnetic featureless eastern portion
of the survey area is due to the absence of the diabase
caprock through erosion. The diabase sill does seem to have
a magnetic signature but it is not consistent and therefore
while broad generalizations are plausible any specific
correlation made between the diabase and the magnetic
features is very tenuous.
The Max Min II+ Survey
The survey area is presented in plan form at a
6
scale of 1:2500 with the vertical scale set at 1 cm = 25*
for the EM profiles with one map for each frequency
surveyed.
Only two conductive trends were located within the
survey area. A-A' is a four line conductive trend that is
not associated with any distinct magnetic feature. It is
picked up on both frequencies and the comparisons of the two
suggests a reasonably strong bedrock conductor. Conductive
trend B-B' is likewise a good bedrock conductor although it
is only a one line response. It too is not associated with
any magnetic feature.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The survey area is underlain by a predominately
felsic volcanic sequence of rocks overlain for the most part
by a diabase sill. The sill or sills are responsible for the
main magnetic features noted in the survey area. Both broad
magnetic highs and lows are found to be underlain by diabase
suggesting the sill may have multiple phases that exhibit
different magnetic signatures. Geological mapping has
suggested that there may be more than one sill. If this is
the case, emplacement of the sills during different magnetic
reversal periods is also a possible cause of the different
magnetic properties of the diabase.
The conductive trends located are not related to
any magnetic features but are good bedrock anomalies and
probably represent sulphide rich horizons located within the
volcanics. The lack of magnetic features associated with
these sulphide horizons is probably due, at least in part,
to the masking effect of the diabase.
Detailed mapping and prospecting should be carried
out to better understand and evaluate the geophysical
results. A lithogeochemical survey of the volcanic sequence
of rocks to outline any alteration halos present should be
done to aid in evaluating the base metal potential of the
area. Sampling and assaying of any showing with respect to
economic sulphides may indicate where along the sulphide
horizon a VMS site is possibly located.
The presence of the diabase sills presents
serious limitations on the success of the above
recommendations. If any bedrock conductors are drilled,
careful logging and analysis of the core is essential to
evaluate the potential of the volcanics since these rocks
are not exposed on the eastern part of the survey area.
Subsequent to the above recommendations, a drill
program should be considered to test any resulting target
areas.
Submitted by
8
million y ol
Northern Development and Mines
Ontario
Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim
Mining Act
Transaction Number
O/W0-V
Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used for correspondence. Questions about this cofleciion should be directed lo Ihe Provincial Manager. Mining Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. Fourth Floor, 159 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
Instructions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for n
Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be compte1- Technical reports and maps must accompany. A sketch, showing the daims the work Is as* TSSSSSSTSSSSSSS
4 m* /\ —. —.156 9 3
900CS*ntNoecorded Jets)
l TP.telephone No.
1± ML l* or G Plan No.MMngbMeton
TVtownship/Area'
/^fCtfDale. Work
IS
Work Perfonned (Check One Work Group Only)WorkGroup
Geotechnical Survey
Physical Work. Including Drillingg^^a-— t^ttHnaljMmi lOnaDnnawon
Other Authorized — Work O
Assays
Assignment from Reserve
Type
(*ebpmuc4L (IU46. -f flU*-Mi.a^
fc
| HtCEIVED
ECTioN IR ONLY i r '^1 jJ MINIM, ^Ar, -Snp.iNCH l
Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of CostsNote: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit aN or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded
holder cannot verify expenditures claimed hi the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.
Person* and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address
r
(attach ' cnsAne M necessary)
Certification of Beneficial Interest ' See Note No. 1 on reverse skte
1 certrly that at the time the work was performed, the daims covered in this work
by the current recorded holder.
Date
Oct. 2./P4Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)
bwhjuiCertification of Work Report
1 certify that 1 have a personal knowhits completion and annexed report is
tdge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or wTftessed true.
Name and Address off Person Certifying
Telepone No. Datefa. 7.7. AA*
same during and/or after
Certified By (Signature)
For Office Use OnlyTotal Value Cr. Recorded : Date Recorded j Mining Recorder
Deemed Approval Date Da'e Approved
- g-c/tvre 'y A*e -mo ''s Se 1"
Received Stamp
—————— —— ~]
r':-L^^.-;'" D 1•- - ' "- ' ' P.M :
A T ;
Total Number ofdalnu
-J
crO \JJ
aVs
r^ 0^1 OJ
g
c?:*ilv o-o--J
ijVPc- ~-J f~-
~-^4 *JJ o *r^-^
^^
S:
X0
^^
OOvl
UJ Oo O
eO"JO
c^
~c--o
c*PQ N)CXJ
~O e^
r^ o-n
VJ e*i -^ -^i
r-
Qo 00
-C, c~^
C WbM oO -^
0 cOV*c^ -^i o
tSJ h-1 oO CO-C
r -
COHtX3 oo &0
^^^^
•7*
OJ T^J ^OD -i
—irtt-, d)V-Jfx"35 ^
— 0
i!fi -1
CO l
iir
woQ -O
ViIA
09oUvVJ
vPlyJt/s
00
S0* (A
J '
OO
c C o
j
V.
cr
l-Ci-i.r
V,
rJ
OJWIA
oq o
UJ JA
!AOl
A;
Credits you are claiming in this report maybe cut backJn orderto minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to pnorize the denton of credRs. Please mark (*^) one of the following:
1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over aN claims contained hi this report of work.3. D CredNs are to be cut back as priorlzed on the attached appendix.
In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one wW be implemented.
rded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., wtth respect
Note 2: N work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:
Hotel: Examples of beneficial Interest art un to the mining claim*.
l certify that the recorded hoWer had a beneficial Interest In the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.
SignatureDate
86 9 S l
fi
156
*i.S)JV
s it s
o -o
oo*
co
Vo00-o
ooO
0oC
o00
WO
-t O*
O
(A
0* V
l rr•ECtiV
MIN N3 L
ID
il
ir 0C
o o
o o
OC
OC
oc o O
K* o\IA
to
Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, piease indicate from which claims you wish to pnorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (•J one of the following:
1. O Credits are lo be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work. f .,i ff\3. CI Credits are to be cut back as pnorized on the attached appendix.
jl In the event that you have not specified ycur choice of priority, option one will be implemented
Note 1: Examples of beneficial Interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreemer.ts, etc., with respect to the mining claims.
2: If has been per*^rrr.r-a c- r patented or leased land p'ease c?rrp'ete th.e f;"crt..-.g.
Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentaid Mines
Ministers du Devetoppement du Nord el des mines
Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit
ttat des couts aux fins du credit devaluation
Mining Act/Lol sur les mines
Transaction No/N* de transaction
Personal information coBected on this form to obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information wil be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining daimfs). Questions about this collection should be directed lo the Provincial Manager. Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 4th Floor. 150 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
Les renseignements personnels conlenus dans la presente formula sort recueilisenveftudalaLolsurleernlnesetservkontaienlraJourunregetre des concessions minieres. Adresser toute queaium sur la cotoce de ces rensekjnemenls au chef provincial des terrains mlniers. mintotere du Devetoppement du Nord et des Mines. 158. rue Cedar. 4* etage. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
1. Direct Costs/CoOts directs
Type
WagesSalalrM
Contractor** and Consultant's FeeaDrafts da ('entrepreneur el de ('expert- consell
tuppHes Used FoumNufM utmsese
Equipment Ronlal Location d*
Description
Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur te terrain
Type (0evfu*fiicAL
Typ*
Type
Amount Montant
'Hflm
Total Direct Coot* Total de* coflt* direct*
Totals Total global
•r.; i** *v~*'' 3**:'-?**•rffc "t.-
W04-
t - i . - " ' "y
••fwa-p'V**'^^vmf:
2. Indirect Costs/Gouts Indirects** Not*: When claiming RehabeHatton work Indirect costs are not
l work.Pour le rer rsernent des Iravaux de rehablMatton. les couls Indirects ne sonl pas admissibtos en lant qua uavaux d'evaluation.
Type
Transportation Transport
Food and Lodging NounHureel hebergenient
rjescripaon
Type
Amount
^r^?-- C/ O
Sub Total of IndVect Coat* Total partial d** coot* Indkect*
able (not greater than 20* of Direct Costa)
Total Value of (Total o* OkM and bidbMl coals)
Me (n-excedant pas 20 W
Totals Total global
Mote: The recorded holder w* be required lo verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. H verification to not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.
Note : Le tftuMre enregjstre sera lenu da verifier to* depenses demands** dans le present eut des coOtt dans to* 30 tours survant une demande a eel effet. Si to vermcation n'est pa* effectuee. le minlstre pent reje ou une parae des l
1. Les travaux deposes danfjtsWork fifed within two years of completion is claimed at KWHi of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.
Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 500.t of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:
"olal Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed
x 0.50
2. Les travaux deposes trois. quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achevemeni son! rembourses a 50 "Vb de la valeur lotale du credit d'evaluation susmentionne. Voir les calculs ci-dessous.
Valeur totate du credit d'evaluation
x 0,50
Evaluation lotale demandfte
edification Verifying Statement of Costs Attestation de I'etat des couts
nereby certify:at the amounts shown are as accurate as poss.ole and these costs ere incurred while conducting assessment worn on the lands shown
the accompanying Report of Work form.
J'alieste par la presente :quo les moniants indiques sent le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer les travaux d'evaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formula de rapport de travail ci-jomt
a; as l am authorized Et qu'a litre de -^^^.^-ii-o 3-e *-'eg'C!'e -ep^fc:
.— je sjisite ice-c* aar.s la cc'r
ihis c re cei'e a"sstat.cr.
Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines
December 9, 1994
Geoscience Approvals Section 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5
Telephone: (705) 670-5853 Fax: (705) 670-5863
Our File: 2.15693 Transaction /: W9440.00280
Mining Recorder Ministry of Northern Development 6 Mines 435 James Street South Suite B003Thunder Bay, Ontario P7E 6E3
Dear S ir /Madam:
Subject: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS ON MINING CLAIMS TB 1082886 et al. IN WABIKON LAKE TOWNSHIP
Assessment work credits have been approved as outlined on the report of work form for the submission. The credits have been approved under Section 14 (Geophysical) of the Mining Act Regulations.
The approval date is December 05, 1994.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steven Beneteau at (705) 670-5855.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:
Yours sincerely,
Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section Mining and Land Management Branch Mines and Minerals Division
SB/dl
cc: Resident GeologistThunder Bay, Ontario
Assessment Files Library Sudbury, Ontario
Meo
ven
Loke
.~Ar
ed f
i-7
29 --
l~r-
.-.-
--r—
-i
,. -
- -
p-- -
-, -- -.
, J- L^.
__
_ .
__
_^1
1
l ^
li
L......_,
- -l-
r —
——
—-j,
_
f^ ^
S-
-T:-
-T'±
^——
——
l
H—
——
—
^
D
Circ
le
Lake
Are
a G
-71
0-t
—
X
—x^O
^^i
^ogii^
o
l
LJo o-f ru
LJ Ld
O O+ ru ro
12+00 N
11 + 00 N
BL 10-CC \
CO N
8-00 N
7-3
TB
6 . ^ ^ Ik i ^^o N
N
4 + 00 N
3 + 00 N
2 + 00 N
1 + OC N
J
2-00 S
3 + 00 S
4 + OOS
5+00 S
r 555 TB 1062866
LAKE
LAKE
LJ LJ
CD CD
uo o
LJ
o o4-in
LJ
OCD
LJ
O CD
LJCDO+00
LJ
oCD
oCU
LJ
CD O
C\J
LJ
CD O + OJ OJ
LJ
CD CD
OJ
Ld
CD CD
OJ
LJ
CD CD4inru
LJo o
ru
LJ
CDCD
nj
LJ
CD CD-I-
C7^OJ
LJ
CD CD
LJ
oCD
ro
LJCD CD*ru ro
12+00 N
DM
3C N
BL 10- N
9 + CO
O~" w J \
7 - " " \7 ^^ \^ *
-:o \
\
\
3+00 N
2-CC \
OCC
~ Ow w
3^00 S
5^00 S
\
100 M 200 M
l
GEOPHYSICAL LEGEND
DATUM: 59000 GAMMAS
INSTRUMENT: SC1NTKEX OMNI IV
B AS f STATION RECORDER: SC1NTR&X OMNI IV
ACCURACY: t nt (GAMMA)
RECORDER INTERVAL; 10 SEC
CONTOUR INTERVAL: ZSO CAM M AS
^RECEIVEDMAGNETIC LOW:•czzNOV8 1994
TOPOGRAPHIC LEGEND
CLAIM POST:
LAKE SHORE:
STREAM:
SWAMP:
ROAD:
^•15693
CUMBERLAND RESOURCES LTD.
WHISTLE LAKE EAST PROJECTTHUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION
WABIKON LAKE AREA
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
Date: SEPT 1994 Scale: 1:2500 N.T.S. 52-H-6
PHANTOM
S2H06SWD019 2.15693 WABIKON LAKE 210
A TION SEJRplCES LTD.
V -
oCD4 OJ
12+00 N
11+00 N
3L : \
00 N
8-CC \
7-00 N
TB 1
6-00 \
N
3-30 N
2 + 00 N
i j- r r, \l w J \
3 + 00 S
4 + OOS
5 + 00 S
LJ
O O4 OJ
LJ
CD O+ ro
LJ
Oo4
LJ
Oo4in
LJ
Oo4 \D
LJ
O O4
LJo o+ 00
LJ
CDo4
UJ
o o4
fu
LJ
CD O4
CVJ
LJ
o O
ru
LJo o
OJ
LJ
Oo4 ID OJ
LJ
CD CD4vD CXJ
LJ
Oo
OJ
LJ
Oo-fGOOJ
LJ
O O
(XJ
LJ
O O 4 CDro
LJ
OCD
n
LJ
CD O+ (VJco
TB 1083062
OLLMTT LAKE
LJ
O O4 CO
LJ
CD CD
LJ
CD O-)-in
LJ oCD4 vD
LJ
oCD
LJ
oCD4- 00
LJ
Oo4-
CP-
LJ
O CD + CD(XJ
LJ
CD O4-
OJ
LJ
CDCD4ru
C\J
Ld
O CD4n ru
CD CD4 •sT OJ
O CD4
LOnj
LJ
CDO4 ^0 OJ
LJ
CD CD4rv
(XJ
LJ
CD O4 CD OJ
LJ
CD O4 C^ OJ
LJ
CD CD 4
CDm
LJ
CD CD4
CO
LJ
CDCD 4 OJn
12+00 N
11+00 N
BL 10+00 N
9+00 N
8 + 00 N
7 + 00
S r* r \ ^UO IN
-cc \
4-CC N
3 + 00 N!
1 + 00 N
\
GEOPHYSICAL LEGENDINSTRUMENT: APEX MAX-MIN 7/4
PROFILE SCALE: 1 CM = 25K POSITIVE READINGS TO THE RIGHT OF LINE
COIL SEPARATION: 2.00 METRES
2-OG S
OCT or rmta fuafOM
3-00 S
RECEIVED
NOV8 1994
MNMGLM0SBRANCH
5 + 00 S
OM 100 M 200 M
52H06SWD019 2 15693 WABIKON LAKE 220
TOPOGRAPHIC LEGEND
CLAIM POST:
LAKE SHORE:
STREAM: . 153 S SROAD:
CUMBERLAND RESOURCES LTD.
WHISTLE LAKE EAST PROJECTTHUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION
WABIKON LAKE AREA
MAX MIN II+ SURVEY 1777 HZ PROFILES
jjcafe; 1:2500 y^T.5. 52-H-G
PH. ATION^ERVICES LTD.
V -*~.
12+90 N
11 + 00 N
BL 10+00 N
9+00 N
8 + 00 N
7+00 N
TB 1DB30C3
6 + 00 N
5 + 30 N
4 + 00 N
3 + 00 M
2 + 00 N
"B i:e?B99
1 + 00 N
0-00
1-CO S
2 + 00 S
3 + 00 S
4 + OOS
LJ
OCD4-n
LJo o4-
LJ
O CD4-in
LJo o-f
LJ
OCD
LJo o4- GO
LJ
CDCD4-
LJ
CD CD
OJ
CD CD4- OJoj
LJ
Oo4- n ru
CDCD4-in ru
LJo o4- \0 ru
LJ
CDCD
oj
LJ oCD4-
CO (XJ
LJCD O4-ON OJ
LJ
o o+ o n
T B 1083063
LAKE5+00 S
•nmuJ
CD CD+ OJ
LJ
CD CD
LJ
CDCD
LJ
CD O4-in
LJ
O CD^ \D
LJ
CD CD
LJ
O CD4- 00
LJ
CD CD4
LJ
O O-f- oCXJ
CD CD
u
LJ
CD CD4- OJ CXJ
LJ
O CD*
CO OJ
LJ
CD CD-f
•5}-OJ
LJ
CD CD4-inOJ
LJ
O O4- vDnj
LJ
CD CD4-rv ru
LJ
O CD4- CO OJ
LJ
CD CD4- ONOJ
LJ
CD CD4- CDD
230
LJCD CD•f ^—iO
LJ
O
si
TB 1083062
-—-.f——f-- - J---k
TT LAKE
LJ
CD CD4-
*—in
LJ
CDCD4-
CXJ CO
OM
12+00 N
11 + 00 N
BL 10+00 N
9+00 N
8 + 00 N
7 + 00 N
6+00 N
\
4 + 00 N
3+00 N
2 + 00 N
1 + 00 N
o rv oo~u J
1 + 00 S
2+00 S
3-00 S
5 + 00 S
100 M
'
f
GEOPHYSICAL LEGENDINSTRUMENT: APEX M AX- M IN
PROFILE SCALE: t CM = 257.POSITIVE READINGS TO THE RIGHT OF LINE
COIL SEPARATION: ±00 METRES
2.15693
TOPOGRAPHIC LEGEND
200 M
CLAIM POST:
LAKE SffORg:
STRE/OI:
SWAMP:
ROAD:
CUMBERLAND RESOURCES LTD.
WHISTLE LAKE EAST PROJECTTHUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION
WABIKON LAKE AREA
MAX MIN II+ SURVEY 444 HZ PROFILES
Date: S EPJ^W&T ~ffi 1:2500 .T.S. 52-H-6
RATIN/SERVICES LTD,