OntarioMinistry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministers duDevetoppement du Nord et des Mines

January 9, 1995

Geoscience Approvals Section 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: (705) 670-5853 Fax: (705) 670-5863

Our File: 2.15702 Transaction /: H9480.00537

Mining Recorder Ministry of Northern Development 6 Mines 4 Government Road East Kirkland Lake, Ontario P2N 1A2

Dear Sir/Madam:

Subject: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS OH MINING CLAIM L1200828 IH LEBEL TOWNSHIP

Assessment work credits have been approved as outlined on the report of work form for the submission. The credits have been approved under Section 14 (Geophysical) of the Mining Act Regulations.

The approval date is January 04, 1995.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steven Beneteau at (705) 670-5855.

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

Yours sincerely,

Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section Mining and Land Management Branch Mines and Minerals Division

SBB/dl

cc: Resident GeologistKirkland Lake, Ontario

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, Ontario

/

S2H06SW0019 2.1S693 WABIKON LAKE 010

RECEIVED

MOV 8 1994

MINING LANDS BRANCH

GEOPHYSICAL

REPORT

j 2.15393

WHISTLE LAKE EAST PROJECT

NTS 52-H-6

BY: PHANTOM EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD. 103-79 NORTH COURT STREET THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO P7A 4T7 SEPTEMBER, 1994

S2H06SWD019 2.15693 WABIKON LAKE 01OC

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION...................................1

GRIDING,LOCATION AND ACCESS....................1

LIST OF CLAIMS.................................2

PROPERTY GEOLOGY...............................2

THEORY OF OPERATION............................2

SURVEY PROCEDURE...............................5

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS..........................6

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS................7

MAPS INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT

PROTON MAGNETOMETER.......................1:2500

MAXMIN PROFILES 444 HZ....................1:2500

MAXMIN PROFILES 1777 HZ...................1:2500

INTRODUCTION

During the fall of 1994, Phantom Exploration

Services of Thunder Bay, Ontario was contracted by

Cumberland Resources Ltd. of Thunder Bay, Ontario to cut a

grid on their Whistle Lake East Project and subsequently, to

complete MaxMin II+ and proton magnetometer geophysical

surveys on the grid. The property consists of 76 unpatented

mining claims containing 96 units numbered TB 1082884-899

inclusive, TB 1083000-003 inclusive, TB 1083035-036

inclusive, TB 1083041-070 inclusive, TB 1083073-082

inclusive, TB 1083084-092 inclusive, TB 1195981, TB 1088209-

210 inclusive and TB 1209446-447 inclusive which are located

in the Thunder Bay Mining Division.

GRIDING. LOCATION AND ACCESS

Approximately 28.6 kilometres of line were

cut, chained and picketed at 25 metre intervals. The

baseline was orientated east-west and the grid lines were

cut perpendicular to it at 100 metre intervals. The line

cutting was completed by Timmins North Exploration Services

of Timmins, Ontario while the geophysical surveys were

carried out by Phantom Exploration Services Ltd.

The property is located about 100 kilometres due

north of Thunder Bay, Ontario and about 4km east of Highway

#527. Access is provided to the general area by highways

til/417 and #527. At a point about 100 kilometres north of

1

junction of these two highways, access is gained by

travelling (5km) north and east on old logging roads to the

survey area.

CLAIMS COVERED BY THIS REPORT

TB 1082886 TB 1082887 TB 1082888

TB 1082889 TB 1082890 TB 1082891

TB 1082896 TB 1082897 TB 1082898

TB 1082899 TB 1083000 TB 1083001

TB 1083064 TB 1083065 TB 1083076

TB 1083077 TB 1083078 TB 1209446

PROPERTY GEOLOGY

The property is underlain by an east-west trending

sequence of volcanic rocks which are capped by a diabase

sill. This sill, which in general thickens to the east, is

relatively thin in the survey area and in some areas is

completely removed. The volcanics exposed in these windows

are for the most part felsic in composition and exhibit

zones of alteration associated with varying amounts of

sulphides consisting of mainly pyrite and pyrrhotite.

A relatively thin, flat lying, fine grained, white

recrystallized dolomitic limestone is closely associated

spatially with the diabase sill.

THEORY OF OPERATION

The Proton Magnetometer

The proton precession magnetometer is so named

because it utilizes the precession of spinning protons or

nuclei of the hydrogen atom in a sample of hydrocarbon fluid

(kerosene) to measure the total magnetic field intensity.

The spinning protons behave as small, spinning

magnetic dipoles. These magnets are temporarily polarized by

application of a uniform magnetic field generated by a

current in a coil of wire. When the current is removed, the

spin of the protons causes them to precess about the '

direction of the earth's ambient magnetic field. The

precessing protons then generate a small magnetic signal

whose frequency is precisely proportional to the total

magnetic field intensity and independent of the orientation

of the coil (sensor). The proportionality which relates

frequency to the field intensity is called the gyromagnetic

ratio of the proton. The precession frequency, typically

2000 Hz, is measured as the absolute value of the total

magnetic field intensity with an accuracy of 0.1 gamma.

The total magnetic intensity, as measured by the

proton magnetometer is the magnitude of the earth's field

vector which is independent of its direction. The

measurement can be expressed as a length (50,000 gammas) of

the earth's field vector. A local disturbance, say 10

gammas, would add or subtract to the undisturbed field of

50,000 gammas in the usual manner of vector addition. Since

the proton magnetometer measures only the magnitude of the

resultant vector, (whose direction is almost parallel to the

undisturbed total field vector) that which is measured is

very nearly the component of the disturbance vector. Thus

the change in the total field intensity is called the

anomaly.

The Max Min II+

Since the horizontal loop E.M. system is maximum

coupled, measurement at the receiver is most conveniently

made in terms of the ratios of the in phase and out of phase

voltages induced in a reference coil. The reference coil is

mounted directly on the transmitting coil in the orientation

of the maximum coupling. The reference and the receiver

voltage are compared in a bridge ratiometer circuit, the

output of which is displayed on the in and out of phase

meters. These meters will read zero when the signal is

entirely due to the primary field and its phase shift is

ninety degrees (i.e. no E.M. anomaly present). When readings

are taken in the vicinity of a conductor, the in phase and

the out of phase components of the secondary field are

measured as a percentage of the primary field intensity and

phase at the receiver.

SURVEY PROCEDURE

The Max Min II+

The equipment used for this survey was a Max Min

II+ manufactured by Apex Parametrics Limited of Uxbridge,

Ontario. The survey was conducted using the in-line array,

with coplanar coils moving in tandem along survey lines

orientated perpendicular to the geologic strike. The

horizontal separation between the coils is kept constant by

means of accurate secant chaining of the lines. A continuous

inclinometer survey is carried out by the receiver operator

as he travels from station to station. By simple arithmetic

averaging, the percentage slope (tilt) between coils can be

calculated and thus any errors due to elevation differences

between the transmitter and the receiver can be eliminated

by using the tiltmeter to keep the coils coplanar. Both in

and out of pase readings were taken at 25 meter intervals

along the survey lines for two frequencies ( 1777Hz and 444

Hz). These readings are plotted at mid point between the

transmitter and the receiver.

The Proton Magnetometer

The proton magnetometer survey was conducted using

a EDA OMNI IV magnetometer. The total field was read with a

resolution of one gamma and the data was corrected for

diurnal variations using another OMNI IV magnetometer in the

base station mode. Data was collected at 25 metre intervals

along the grid lines.

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

The Proton Magnetometer Survey

The survey area is presented in plan form at a

scale of 1:2500. The corrected magnetic data is plotted on

this map and contoured at 250 gamma intervals.

While the data does not exhibit any strong regional

gradient, it does outline a fairly well defined northwest

southeast regional trend east of line 19+OOE. This trend

consists of two broad magnetic lows separated by a broad

magnetic high. Closely associated magnetic highs and lows

such as are located on line 22+OOE at about 5+OON are'due to

dipole effects. The magnetic features outlined by the survey

are due almost entirely to the diabase sill. The magnetic

differences noted within the diabase (i.e. both broad highs

and lows) may be due to different phases within the diabase

sill itself or possibly due to two different sills that may

have been emplaced during different magnetic reversal

periods. The relatively magnetic featureless eastern portion

of the survey area is due to the absence of the diabase

caprock through erosion. The diabase sill does seem to have

a magnetic signature but it is not consistent and therefore

while broad generalizations are plausible any specific

correlation made between the diabase and the magnetic

features is very tenuous.

The Max Min II+ Survey

The survey area is presented in plan form at a

6

scale of 1:2500 with the vertical scale set at 1 cm = 25*

for the EM profiles with one map for each frequency

surveyed.

Only two conductive trends were located within the

survey area. A-A' is a four line conductive trend that is

not associated with any distinct magnetic feature. It is

picked up on both frequencies and the comparisons of the two

suggests a reasonably strong bedrock conductor. Conductive

trend B-B' is likewise a good bedrock conductor although it

is only a one line response. It too is not associated with

any magnetic feature.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The survey area is underlain by a predominately

felsic volcanic sequence of rocks overlain for the most part

by a diabase sill. The sill or sills are responsible for the

main magnetic features noted in the survey area. Both broad

magnetic highs and lows are found to be underlain by diabase

suggesting the sill may have multiple phases that exhibit

different magnetic signatures. Geological mapping has

suggested that there may be more than one sill. If this is

the case, emplacement of the sills during different magnetic

reversal periods is also a possible cause of the different

magnetic properties of the diabase.

The conductive trends located are not related to

any magnetic features but are good bedrock anomalies and

probably represent sulphide rich horizons located within the

volcanics. The lack of magnetic features associated with

these sulphide horizons is probably due, at least in part,

to the masking effect of the diabase.

Detailed mapping and prospecting should be carried

out to better understand and evaluate the geophysical

results. A lithogeochemical survey of the volcanic sequence

of rocks to outline any alteration halos present should be

done to aid in evaluating the base metal potential of the

area. Sampling and assaying of any showing with respect to

economic sulphides may indicate where along the sulphide

horizon a VMS site is possibly located.

The presence of the diabase sills presents

serious limitations on the success of the above

recommendations. If any bedrock conductors are drilled,

careful logging and analysis of the core is essential to

evaluate the potential of the volcanics since these rocks

are not exposed on the eastern part of the survey area.

Subsequent to the above recommendations, a drill

program should be considered to test any resulting target

areas.

Submitted by

8

million y ol

Northern Development and Mines

Ontario

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act

Transaction Number

O/W0-V

Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used for correspondence. Questions about this cofleciion should be directed lo Ihe Provincial Manager. Mining Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. Fourth Floor, 159 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

Instructions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for n

Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be compte1- Technical reports and maps must accompany. A sketch, showing the daims the work Is as* TSSSSSSTSSSSSSS

4 m* /\ —. —.156 9 3

900CS*ntNoecorded Jets)

l TP.telephone No.

1± ML l* or G Plan No.MMngbMeton

TVtownship/Area'

/^fCtfDale. Work

IS

Work Perfonned (Check One Work Group Only)WorkGroup

Geotechnical Survey

Physical Work. Including Drillingg^^a-— t^ttHnaljMmi lOnaDnnawon

Other Authorized — Work O

Assays

Assignment from Reserve

Type

(*ebpmuc4L (IU46. -f flU*-Mi.a^

fc

| HtCEIVED

ECTioN IR ONLY i r '^1 jJ MINIM, ^Ar, -Snp.iNCH l

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of CostsNote: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit aN or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded

holder cannot verify expenditures claimed hi the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Person* and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address

r

(attach ' cnsAne M necessary)

Certification of Beneficial Interest ' See Note No. 1 on reverse skte

1 certrly that at the time the work was performed, the daims covered in this work

by the current recorded holder.

Date

Oct. 2./P4Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

bwhjuiCertification of Work Report

1 certify that 1 have a personal knowhits completion and annexed report is

tdge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or wTftessed true.

Name and Address off Person Certifying

Telepone No. Datefa. 7.7. AA*

same during and/or after

Certified By (Signature)

For Office Use OnlyTotal Value Cr. Recorded : Date Recorded j Mining Recorder

Deemed Approval Date Da'e Approved

- g-c/tvre 'y A*e -mo ''s Se 1"

Received Stamp

—————— —— ~]

r':-L^^.-;'" D 1•- - ' "- ' ' P.M :

A T ;

Total Number ofdalnu

-J

crO \JJ

aVs

r^ 0^1 OJ

g

c?:*ilv o-o--J

ijVPc- ~-J f~-

~-^4 *JJ o *r^-^

^^

S:

X0

^^

OOvl

UJ Oo O

eO"JO

c^

~c--o

c*PQ N)CXJ

~O e^

r^ o-n

VJ e*i -^ -^i

r-

Qo 00

-C, c~^

C WbM oO -^

0 cOV*c^ -^i o

tSJ h-1 oO CO-C

r -

COHtX3 oo &0

^^^^

•7*

OJ T^J ^OD -i

—irtt-, d)V-Jfx"35 ^

— 0

i!fi -1

CO l

iir

woQ -O

ViIA

09oUvVJ

vPlyJt/s

00

S0* (A

J '

OO

c C o

j

V.

cr

l-Ci-i.r

V,

rJ

OJWIA

oq o

UJ JA

!AOl

A;

Credits you are claiming in this report maybe cut backJn orderto minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to pnorize the denton of credRs. Please mark (*^) one of the following:

1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over aN claims contained hi this report of work.3. D CredNs are to be cut back as priorlzed on the attached appendix.

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one wW be implemented.

rded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., wtth respect

Note 2: N work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:

Hotel: Examples of beneficial Interest art un to the mining claim*.

l certify that the recorded hoWer had a beneficial Interest In the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.

SignatureDate

86 9 S l

fi

156

*i.S)JV

s it s

o -o

oo*

co

Vo00-o

ooO

0oC

o00

WO

-t O*

O

(A

0* V

l rr•ECtiV

MIN N3 L

ID

il

ir 0C

o o

o o

OC

OC

oc o O

K* o\IA

to

Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, piease indicate from which claims you wish to pnorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (•J one of the following:

1. O Credits are lo be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work. f .,i ff\3. CI Credits are to be cut back as pnorized on the attached appendix.

jl In the event that you have not specified ycur choice of priority, option one will be implemented

Note 1: Examples of beneficial Interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreemer.ts, etc., with respect to the mining claims.

2: If has been per*^rrr.r-a c- r patented or leased land p'ease c?rrp'ete th.e f;"crt..-.g.

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentaid Mines

Ministers du Devetoppement du Nord el des mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

ttat des couts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Lol sur les mines

Transaction No/N* de transaction

Personal information coBected on this form to obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information wil be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining daimfs). Questions about this collection should be directed lo the Provincial Manager. Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 4th Floor. 150 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

Les renseignements personnels conlenus dans la presente formula sort recueilisenveftudalaLolsurleernlnesetservkontaienlraJourunregetre des concessions minieres. Adresser toute queaium sur la cotoce de ces rensekjnemenls au chef provincial des terrains mlniers. mintotere du Devetoppement du Nord et des Mines. 158. rue Cedar. 4* etage. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costs/CoOts directs

Type

WagesSalalrM

Contractor** and Consultant's FeeaDrafts da ('entrepreneur el de ('expert- consell

tuppHes Used FoumNufM utmsese

Equipment Ronlal Location d*

Description

Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur te terrain

Type (0evfu*fiicAL

Typ*

Type

Amount Montant

'Hflm

Total Direct Coot* Total de* coflt* direct*

Totals Total global

•r.; i** *v~*'' 3**:'-?**•rffc "t.-

W04-

t - i . - " ' "y

••fwa-p'V**'^^vmf:

2. Indirect Costs/Gouts Indirects** Not*: When claiming RehabeHatton work Indirect costs are not

l work.Pour le rer rsernent des Iravaux de rehablMatton. les couls Indirects ne sonl pas admissibtos en lant qua uavaux d'evaluation.

Type

Transportation Transport

Food and Lodging NounHureel hebergenient

rjescripaon

Type

Amount

^r^?-- C/ O

Sub Total of IndVect Coat* Total partial d** coot* Indkect*

able (not greater than 20* of Direct Costa)

Total Value of (Total o* OkM and bidbMl coals)

Me (n-excedant pas 20 W

Totals Total global

Mote: The recorded holder w* be required lo verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. H verification to not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Note : Le tftuMre enregjstre sera lenu da verifier to* depenses demands** dans le present eut des coOtt dans to* 30 tours survant une demande a eel effet. Si to vermcation n'est pa* effectuee. le minlstre pent reje ou une parae des l

1. Les travaux deposes danfjtsWork fifed within two years of completion is claimed at KWHi of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 500.t of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

"olal Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed

x 0.50

2. Les travaux deposes trois. quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achevemeni son! rembourses a 50 "Vb de la valeur lotale du credit d'evaluation susmentionne. Voir les calculs ci-dessous.

Valeur totate du credit d'evaluation

x 0,50

Evaluation lotale demandfte

edification Verifying Statement of Costs Attestation de I'etat des couts

nereby certify:at the amounts shown are as accurate as poss.ole and these costs ere incurred while conducting assessment worn on the lands shown

the accompanying Report of Work form.

J'alieste par la presente :quo les moniants indiques sent le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer les travaux d'evaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formula de rapport de travail ci-jomt

a; as l am authorized Et qu'a litre de -^^^.^-ii-o 3-e *-'eg'C!'e -ep^fc:

.— je sjisite ice-c* aar.s la cc'r

ihis c re cei'e a"sstat.cr.

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

December 9, 1994

Geoscience Approvals Section 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: (705) 670-5853 Fax: (705) 670-5863

Our File: 2.15693 Transaction /: W9440.00280

Mining Recorder Ministry of Northern Development 6 Mines 435 James Street South Suite B003Thunder Bay, Ontario P7E 6E3

Dear S ir /Madam:

Subject: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS ON MINING CLAIMS TB 1082886 et al. IN WABIKON LAKE TOWNSHIP

Assessment work credits have been approved as outlined on the report of work form for the submission. The credits have been approved under Section 14 (Geophysical) of the Mining Act Regulations.

The approval date is December 05, 1994.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steven Beneteau at (705) 670-5855.

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

Yours sincerely,

Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section Mining and Land Management Branch Mines and Minerals Division

SB/dl

cc: Resident GeologistThunder Bay, Ontario

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, Ontario

Meo

ven

Loke

.~Ar

ed f

i-7

29 --

l~r-

.-.-

--r—

-i

,. -

- -

p-- -

-, -- -.

, J- L^.

__

_ .

__

_^1

1

l ^

li

L......_,

- -l-

r —

——

—-j,

_

f^ ^

S-

-T:-

-T'±

^——

——

l

H—

——

—

^

D

Circ

le

Lake

Are

a G

-71

0-t

—

X

—x^O

^^i

^ogii^

o

l

LJo o-f ru

LJ Ld

O O+ ru ro

12+00 N

11 + 00 N

BL 10-CC \

CO N

8-00 N

7-3

TB

6 . ^ ^ Ik i ^^o N

N

4 + 00 N

3 + 00 N

2 + 00 N

1 + OC N

J

2-00 S

3 + 00 S

4 + OOS

5+00 S

r 555 TB 1062866

LAKE

LAKE

LJ LJ

CD CD

uo o

LJ

o o4-in

LJ

OCD

LJ

O CD

LJCDO+00

LJ

oCD

oCU

LJ

CD O

C\J

LJ

CD O + OJ OJ

LJ

CD CD

OJ

Ld

CD CD

OJ

LJ

CD CD4inru

LJo o

ru

LJ

CDCD

nj

LJ

CD CD-I-

C7^OJ

LJ

CD CD

LJ

oCD

ro

LJCD CD*ru ro

12+00 N

DM

3C N

BL 10- N

9 + CO

O~" w J \

7 - " " \7 ^^ \^ *

-:o \

\

\

3+00 N

2-CC \

OCC

~ Ow w

3^00 S

5^00 S

\

100 M 200 M

l

GEOPHYSICAL LEGEND

DATUM: 59000 GAMMAS

INSTRUMENT: SC1NTKEX OMNI IV

B AS f STATION RECORDER: SC1NTR&X OMNI IV

ACCURACY: t nt (GAMMA)

RECORDER INTERVAL; 10 SEC

CONTOUR INTERVAL: ZSO CAM M AS

^RECEIVEDMAGNETIC LOW:•czzNOV8 1994

TOPOGRAPHIC LEGEND

CLAIM POST:

LAKE SHORE:

STREAM:

SWAMP:

ROAD:

^•15693

CUMBERLAND RESOURCES LTD.

WHISTLE LAKE EAST PROJECTTHUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

WABIKON LAKE AREA

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

Date: SEPT 1994 Scale: 1:2500 N.T.S. 52-H-6

PHANTOM

S2H06SWD019 2.15693 WABIKON LAKE 210

A TION SEJRplCES LTD.

V -

oCD4 OJ

12+00 N

11+00 N

3L : \

00 N

8-CC \

7-00 N

TB 1

6-00 \

N

3-30 N

2 + 00 N

i j- r r, \l w J \

3 + 00 S

4 + OOS

5 + 00 S

LJ

O O4 OJ

LJ

CD O+ ro

LJ

Oo4

LJ

Oo4in

LJ

Oo4 \D

LJ

O O4

LJo o+ 00

LJ

CDo4

UJ

o o4

fu

LJ

CD O4

CVJ

LJ

o O

ru

LJo o

OJ

LJ

Oo4 ID OJ

LJ

CD CD4vD CXJ

LJ

Oo

OJ

LJ

Oo-fGOOJ

LJ

O O

(XJ

LJ

O O 4 CDro

LJ

OCD

n

LJ

CD O+ (VJco

TB 1083062

OLLMTT LAKE

LJ

O O4 CO

LJ

CD CD

LJ

CD O-)-in

LJ oCD4 vD

LJ

oCD

LJ

oCD4- 00

LJ

Oo4-

CP-

LJ

O CD + CD(XJ

LJ

CD O4-

OJ

LJ

CDCD4ru

C\J

Ld

O CD4n ru

CD CD4 •sT OJ

O CD4

LOnj

LJ

CDO4 ^0 OJ

LJ

CD CD4rv

(XJ

LJ

CD O4 CD OJ

LJ

CD O4 C^ OJ

LJ

CD CD 4

CDm

LJ

CD CD4

CO

LJ

CDCD 4 OJn

12+00 N

11+00 N

BL 10+00 N

9+00 N

8 + 00 N

7 + 00

S r* r \ ^UO IN

-cc \

4-CC N

3 + 00 N!

1 + 00 N

\

GEOPHYSICAL LEGENDINSTRUMENT: APEX MAX-MIN 7/4

PROFILE SCALE: 1 CM = 25K POSITIVE READINGS TO THE RIGHT OF LINE

COIL SEPARATION: 2.00 METRES

2-OG S

OCT or rmta fuafOM

3-00 S

RECEIVED

NOV8 1994

MNMGLM0SBRANCH

5 + 00 S

OM 100 M 200 M

52H06SWD019 2 15693 WABIKON LAKE 220

TOPOGRAPHIC LEGEND

CLAIM POST:

LAKE SHORE:

STREAM: . 153 S SROAD:

CUMBERLAND RESOURCES LTD.

WHISTLE LAKE EAST PROJECTTHUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

WABIKON LAKE AREA

MAX MIN II+ SURVEY 1777 HZ PROFILES

jjcafe; 1:2500 y^T.5. 52-H-G

PH. ATION^ERVICES LTD.

V -*~.

12+90 N

11 + 00 N

BL 10+00 N

9+00 N

8 + 00 N

7+00 N

TB 1DB30C3

6 + 00 N

5 + 30 N

4 + 00 N

3 + 00 M

2 + 00 N

"B i:e?B99

1 + 00 N

0-00

1-CO S

2 + 00 S

3 + 00 S

4 + OOS

LJ

OCD4-n

LJo o4-

LJ

O CD4-in

LJo o-f

LJ

OCD

LJo o4- GO

LJ

CDCD4-

LJ

CD CD

OJ

CD CD4- OJoj

LJ

Oo4- n ru

CDCD4-in ru

LJo o4- \0 ru

LJ

CDCD

oj

LJ oCD4-

CO (XJ

LJCD O4-ON OJ

LJ

o o+ o n

T B 1083063

LAKE5+00 S

•nmuJ

CD CD+ OJ

LJ

CD CD

LJ

CDCD

LJ

CD O4-in

LJ

O CD^ \D

LJ

CD CD

LJ

O CD4- 00

LJ

CD CD4

LJ

O O-f- oCXJ

CD CD

u

LJ

CD CD4- OJ CXJ

LJ

O CD*

CO OJ

LJ

CD CD-f

•5}-OJ

LJ

CD CD4-inOJ

LJ

O O4- vDnj

LJ

CD CD4-rv ru

LJ

O CD4- CO OJ

LJ

CD CD4- ONOJ

LJ

CD CD4- CDD

230

LJCD CD•f ^—iO

LJ

O

si

TB 1083062

-—-.f——f-- - J---k

TT LAKE

LJ

CD CD4-

*—in

LJ

CDCD4-

CXJ CO

OM

12+00 N

11 + 00 N

BL 10+00 N

9+00 N

8 + 00 N

7 + 00 N

6+00 N

\

4 + 00 N

3+00 N

2 + 00 N

1 + 00 N

o rv oo~u J

1 + 00 S

2+00 S

3-00 S

5 + 00 S

100 M

'

f

GEOPHYSICAL LEGENDINSTRUMENT: APEX M AX- M IN

PROFILE SCALE: t CM = 257.POSITIVE READINGS TO THE RIGHT OF LINE

COIL SEPARATION: ±00 METRES

2.15693

TOPOGRAPHIC LEGEND

200 M

CLAIM POST:

LAKE SffORg:

STRE/OI:

SWAMP:

ROAD:

CUMBERLAND RESOURCES LTD.

WHISTLE LAKE EAST PROJECTTHUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

WABIKON LAKE AREA

MAX MIN II+ SURVEY 444 HZ PROFILES

Date: S EPJ^W&T ~ffi 1:2500 .T.S. 52-H-6

RATIN/SERVICES LTD,