ll llif l

JH

l

l

l

i iii,.,

|;

,

i ilij-.-

l

a.11224 BEEMER 010

HSK MINERALS LTD

GEOPHYSICAL REPORT

ON THE

MUSKASENDA LAKE PROPERTY

ENGLISH AND BEEMER TOWNSHIPS

RECEIVEDMAY 24 1988

MINING LANDS SECTION

March 198B Timmins, Ontario

Eduard Ludwig HB.Sc. Geologist

010C

l

i

l;

i i i i i i iil i i ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l

2. O PROPERTY LOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

3.0 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND CLAIM LIST . . . . . . . . . 3

4.0 TOPOGRAPHY, VEGETATION, OVERBURDEN . . . . . . . . 4

5.0 PREVIOUS EXPLORATION WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

6.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

7.0 PROPERTY GEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

8.0 MAGNETOMETER SURVEY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

8.1 MAGNETOMETER SURVEY RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

9.0 HORIZONTAL LOOP, ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY . . . . . . 17

9. l RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . 19

ia i LIST OF MAPS

lMap #1 Magnetometer Survey

m Map #2 Max Min II Survey at 444 Hz

l Map #3 Max Min II Survey at 1777 Hz

l Map tt4 Diamond Drill Hole Location Plan

il

i ii i iii

lili ii iiiifi

i i il

t.-;.'

mf' " ' ii1

i PI i

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure l Location Map

Figure 2 Claim Sroup Map

LIST OF TABLES

Table l Table of Formations

lli i l l lfi lll li iili i

1.0 INTRODUCTION

During the months of July and August 1987, Hussey Geophysics

Ltd. carried out linecutting and two geophysical surveys covering

the land portions of the 39 claim Muskasenda Lake Property.

Approximately 56 kilometers of grid lines were established

as control, with lines at 125 meter centers and stations spaced

every 25 meters.

Horizontal Loop and Magnetometer surveys were carried out,

in efforts to identify geological structures and stratigraphy

which may be associated with base metals or gold mineralization.

Commencing September l, 1988, a diamond drill program was

carried out totalling 2,594 feet.

1 m

l

l

l l j

li ii il

ii-,ij*'

l

2.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Muskasenda Lake Property (NTS 42 A/3) is located in the

west central part of English Township, with the northern portion

straddling the English-Beemer Township boundary, near the 4-mile

post (Figs l k 2 ').

Access to the property is by bush road, 50 miles south of

Timmins, Ontario, with winter access by helicopter or

ski-equipped airplane.

The Sudbur y-Ti rnmi ns high voltage power-line passes about 4

miles east of Muskasenda Lake.

O mn

l|V JI

llIlII i ii i i i i i

i

HSK MINERALS LTD

aUEBEC

CNMMANMI

ii l

HSK MINERALS LTD.CLIENT:

PROPERTY: ENGLISH a BEEMER TOWNSHIPTITLE:

LOCATION HAP

Pitt: MARCH I98B

Drawn:

Sctlt: 1"*Interp:——

FI*. 1NTS; Job No.

lt',,J1/ 1"'

l

l

i liiii

i B

l

i

J

l

l

i••mfy' i

l

3.0 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, CLAIM LIST

At this date, the following claims are

Ltd., Suite 1116, ill Richmond Street West,

(Fig 2).

ENGLISH TOWNSHIP

969247-969266 inclusive

969342-969347 inclusive

969928-969930 inclusive

987532

BEEMER TOWNSHIP

969348-969351 inclusive

969903-969907 inclusive

987138-987145 inclusive

2 Filed Only Claims

held by HSK Minerals

Toronto, Ontario

Assessment Date

April, 1988

April, 1988

April, 1988

April, 1988

April, 1988

April, 1988

June, 1988

Inspection Pending

3-

HSK MINERALS LTD. CLAIM GROUP MAP ENGLISH-BEEMER TOWNSHIPS MARCH 1988 l"- 1/2 MILE

FIGURE 2

\

lf*"'1 "

il

l

ii i i iH

l

l

ii iii .

l

4.0 TOPOGRAPHY, VEGETATION, OVERBURDEN

Relief is extreme along the shores of Muskasenda Lake, with

large swamps interspersed by northeast trending ridges with

topographic highs to 100 feet.

Second growth spruce, Jackpine and poplar are locally dense,

with cedars and alders in the lower areas.

Overburden is extensive and probably quite variable in

depth. The rock exposures, in general, are confined to ridges

and knolls in the swampy areas.

Muskasenda Lake is an excellent source of water, for all

needs, year round.

4

I i i iip- -

ii i l l l l l l l i l

5.0 PREVIOUS (EXPLORATION WORK

The area has received sporadic attention over the years as a

gold and copper prospect.

A tabulated history of the English Township property is as

follows:

1920- Gold discovered by J.C. Nelson near the west shore of

Muskasenda Lake. He carried out limited trenching on this

showing, at the same time prospecting the shores of Musk

asenda Lake and areas around Telluride Lake in Beemer

Township (File-264, Erie Canadian Mines Limited).

1935- Sylvanite Gold Mines Limited optioned the Nelson prospect

in 1935 and carried out a trenching and sampling program.

On the west showing, a shear 80 feet wide and traceable

for 700 feet, was uncovered in which a 28-foot length

assayed 0.144 ounce of gold per ton over 3.2 feet.

Sylvanite concluded that this zone was open to the

5

i il iiillliip,..,,;,... j;-i ir* y/

i i i ii

liP" 'I-. :

II

northeast (N 75o E) with gold values and widths

increasing. Grab samples from different areas within the

aforementioned zone assayed from 0.20-1.32 ounces of gold

per ton. The option was dropped in early 1937. Nelson

allowed the claims to lapse, eventually being reverted

back to the crown.

1965- Transterre Exploration Limited optioned the claims encom

passing the south showing from Ned Bragagnola in early

1965. Detailed geological work in the immediate vicinity

of the showing was initially completed, followed by 1800

feet of diamond drilling. Five holes were put down to

test a gold-bearing sericite schist and associated quartz

veining, along strike and at depth. Directly beneath the

showing, at a vertical depth of 260 feet, the schist was

intersected for 5 feet and assayed 0.14 ounce of gold per

ton. In the same hole, 20 feet below the schist, a quartz

vein was intersected which assayed 0.32 ounce of gold per

ton over two feet. A second hole (T-4) was put down be

neath the showing at a shallower depth, intersecting

-6-

lf:''.

ll l l i iiiii i i i l i i i

similar geology, but no assays were reported. The other 3

holes intersected mineralization in the range of

0.01-0.03 ounce of gold per ton over short sections. The

option was dropped in 1966.

1968- Frank Boychuck, of Timmins, Ontario, acquired 44 claims

encompassing both the south and west showings. Nineteen

of the 44, along the west shore of Muskasenda Lake, were

optioned to Cyprus Exploration Limited as part of their

base metal exploration program. These claims also sur

rounded the west gold showing, but apparently were not

examined or evaluated by Cyprus Exploration Limited. On

the south showing Frank Boychuck trenched and blasted a

20-foot section, exposing three gold-bearing veins. An

engineer's report was completed on these veins by C.T.

Bischoff of Noranda, Quebec, in 1974, in which he chip

sampled the veins and reported the following results:

No. l Vein, Au: 0.96 oz/ton, Agt 3.40 oz/ton over 0.5 feet

No. 2 Vein, Au: 0.11 oz/ton, Ags 0.10 oz/ton over 3.0 feet

No. 3 Vein, Aus 0.02 oz/ton, Ags 0.14 oz/ton over 2.0 feet

i l l l l l l l lll l l

i iii

Boychuck drilled 2 holes south of the showing (B-l, B-2,

Fig. 2), totalling 1,200 feet, of which the first hole

(B-l) drilled vertically intersected 30 feet of

porphyritic material. The entire 30 feet was mineralized

with about 10X pyrite. Only 3 feet of this material was

assayed, yielding O.18 ounce of gold per ton. The second

hole (B-2) did not intersect any economic mineralization

(personal communication).

1982- Amax Minerals Exploration (now Canamax Resources Inc)

acquired 24 claims encompassing both showings. Work com

pleted included an airborne geophysical survey and a

geological survey using airphotos at a scale of l ""51/4 mi.

Amax assayed material from a small shear on the south

showing returning values up to 0.244 ounce of gold per

ton. No work is evident on the west showing, with only

minor work indicated on the south showing. The claims

were dropped in late 1983.

1984- In July, 1984, Marjel Resources acquired 19 claims

covering the known gold deposits around Muskasenda Lake.

Line-cutting, blasting and chip sampling were completed

l ll flB

l

i

i ii iii iim

over both the south and west showings to date. Gold

values returned from both showings are as follows:

a) South Showing!

b) West Showing: Trench #6

Trench #7

O.14 oz/ton

3.5 feet

0.447 oz/ton

12.8 feet

0.686 oz/ton

6.58 feet

i i

-9-

l[S'1 ?'. ;

"M

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

i ll i

i

6.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY

The property is situated between Timmins and Shiningtree in

the west-central part of the Abitibi Metavolcanic-Metasedimentary

Belt in the Superior province of the Canadian Shield. Bedrock

units (Table 1) consist mainly of Early Precambrian (Archean)

metavolcani cs and mafic to felsic plutonic rocks; however, a few

Middle to Late Precambrian diabase dykes are present. Most of

the bedrock is mantled by thick Pleistocene glacial deposits of

silt and sand, or recent alluvium (Bright, 1984). English

Township and surrounding areas were intitially folded into broad

easterly plunging anticlines with later north to northeast

plunging open cross-folds created by the late tectonic

emplacement of the Moher Pluton. Faults, trending

north-northwest, interpreted by offset, are the Mattagami River

Fault extending through Beemer and Moher Townships, and the

Grassy River Fault (Burrows-Benedict Fault) extending across

southern Zavitz and northern Halliday Townships. The most

prominent northeast trending faults are the Parting Lake Fault,

located in southwest Semple Township, and the Redwing Fault,

located in northeastern Hutt Township (Bright, 1984).

-10-

l ii i t i i i i i i i ii 1

fi-

iiif '

l

l

TABLE lTable of Formations Phanerozoic

CenozoicQuaternaryPleistocene and Recent

Sand, Silt, Gravel, Till, Swamps Precambrian

ProterozoicMafic Intrusive Rocks

Olivine Diabase, Quartz Diabase Early Precambrian

Mafic Intrusive Rocks Diabase

Intrusive Contact

Felsic Intrusive and Metamorphic Rocks Late Granitic Rocks

Biotite Granite, Hornblende Granodiorite, Aplite, Lamprophyre, Quartz-Feldspar Porphyry

Early Granitic RocksQuartz Monzonite, Trondjemite, Diorite Gneiss Amphibole Gneiss, Gneissic Granodiorite

Intrusive ContactMetamorphosed Mafic and Ultramafic Intrusive Rocks

Gabbro, Quratz Gabbro, Diorite, PeridotiteIntrusive Contact

Metavolcanics and Metasediments Metasediments

Conglomerate, with minor Tuffaceous Siltstone and Graphitic slate interbedsIron Formation: Pyritic Graphitic Slate, Magnetite

Intermediate to Felsic MetavolcanicsDacitic to Rhyolitic Massive Flows, Tuff, Lapilli Tuff, Volcanic Breccia, Amygdaloidal and Pillowed Dacitic Flows; Sericite Schist, Chlorite-Sericite Schist

Mafic to Intermediate MetavolcanicsMassive and Pillowed Basaltic to Andesitic Flowsj Variolitic, Amygdaloidal and Porphyritic Flows, minor Tuff and Agglomerate

Table 1. (Bright, 1984)

-11-

lii

i ii

l i li il

iiiii i

7.0 PROPERTY GEOLOGY

A preliminary survey was carried out by HSK Minerals in the

1987 field season, emphasis being placed on evaluating the

economic potential of the known gold showings.

Precambrian rocks of Archean age are exposed within the

property boundaries. There are probably Nipissing and Matachewan

diabase dykes in the area. The basic metavolcanics are tightly

folded and relatively steep dropping to the north, intercalated

with rhyolites and dacites. Tuffs, lapilli tuffs and

agglomerates are abundant as chlorite and chlorite-sericite

schists and make up a large percentage of the property.

Epiclastic sedimentary rocks are not verified on the property,

although sericite schists containing minor fuchsite can be

interpreted as such. Metavolcanics have been intruded by

gabbroic to dioritic dykes, which have been interpreted as having

sill proportions.

Metamorphism is variable, grading from lower greenschist to

mid amphibolite facies. Contact metamorphism is visible around

12-

l i i i i i i i i ii i i i il

i i

the edges of mafic to felsic intrusives, demonstrating a range of

hornfelsic rocks. Schistose rocks are probably the most abundant

on the property and exhibit varying degrees of alteration.

Interpreted through the centre of Muskasenda Lake is a

broad, northeast trending, plunging anticline, caused by

east-west compression during geologic time. Cross-folding of the

lithologies is said to have taken place as a result of the late

tectonic emplacement of the Moher Pluton. Quartz veining

paralleling the axial trace of the anticline through the centre

of Muskasenda Lake is very abundant, healing fractures caused by ,

the broad folding. Minor, small-scale structural features

included shear fractures and tension fractures, caused by pure

shear.

13-

li i i ii i i

if '

i

i

i ii1

8.0 MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

The entire grid was surveyed at 25 meter station intervals

with a Scintrex MP-2 Total Field, Proton Precession Magnetometer

(Appendix A).

Diurnal variations in the earth's total magnetic field were

removed by the "Baseline Looping Method". The baseline 0+00 was

surveyed from L 0+00 to L 30+OOW with readings taken where each

cross-line initiates. The surveyor returned to L 0+00 to re-read

the field at that point. This was completed for baselines

located at 700 North and 17+50 South, respectfully. Therefore,

all baseline values were valid tie-in stations relative to L O,

0+00, L O, 7+00 N, and LO, 17+50 S. As a loop of two north-south

cross lines were surveyed, the operator re-read the stations on

the baseline "tie-ins" to check for a change in the field froml' the time that the baseline was first surveyed. Any change in the

field from the last baseline tie-in would be removed by linear

interpolation based on the time elapsed. This procedure resulted

in data which is precise to within 10 gammas.

-14-

i

l l

l l l l

The corrected data was plotted on a base map at a scale of

1:5000, and contoured at an interval of +X- 100 gammas (Map 1).

A base level of 58,000 gammas was removed from each reading for

ease of data manipulation and interpretation.

l

l

lm

ii i i

-15-

ll

ltm

8.l MAGNETOMETER SURVEY RESULTS

l

i

l In the vicinity of Muskasenda Lake, two sub-parrallei,

' magnetic - high trends cross the property at approximately N20oE. m The trend west of Telluride Bay (trend *A') has been identified

M as a gabbroic, sill-like intrusive which appears to be fault

contacted towards the northwest. This is evident by each magnetic

l high being associated with an adjoining magnetic low or negative

value. Magnetic highs are located crossing trend 'A', which can

l be explained by oblique angle fracturing caused by movement

m ( extension) along this trend.

The second trend which lies southeast of Telluride Bay

l (Trend "B') is interpeted as rock of gabbroic composition which

may or maynot be the anticlinial/synclinal flank of Trend 'A'.

Dyklets and small bodies of coarse grained gabbro may account for

j other magnetic high trends on the property.

Diamond Drilling did encountered up to 10X disseminated

l magnetite within core between 2+5QW and 1+25W, 1+iOON.

-16-

l

l l lli lll

i i i i i im

m

iiii

9.0 HORIZONTAL LOOP, ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY

A horizontal loop, moving coil EM survey was done over the

entire grid, with the Apex Parametrics Max Min II System in

maximum coupled, horizontal loop mode (see Appendix B). Data was

recorded from 444 Hz and 1777 Hz frequency transmissions at 25

meter station intervals. The plot point was considered to be

located at exactly half the distance between the receiver coils

and the transmitter coil. Both the inphase and quadrature phase

of the secondary field were recorded as percentages with a

precision of -f-/- l percent.

The data for the two different frequencies was plotted on

two separate base maps ( see maps no's. 2&S). Both phases (in

phase and quadrature) were profiled at a scale of lcm- 10X

-17-

ll lii lii i

9.1 HORIZONTAL LOOP SURVEY - RESULTS

The HEM survey's failed to locate any conductive lithogies,

sulfides or structures

i

i ii

•'"•'JHb

l

-18-

lll fi l l l l l l ll li l l l

10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Max Min II Survey results would indicate that

electromagnetic surveys are not satisfactory geological tools to

use to explore for minerals on this property. Any sulphides on

the property may be disseminated, and therefore, non conductive.

If a shear zone were present, the sulphides and other associated

chargeable minerals may be aligned along strike in such a way as

to be non-conductive.

This author feels that this property would be an ideal one

on which to use the induced polarization, time-domain method. A

survey of this type would detect any significant disseminated Cor

massive) sulphide deposit comprising as little as 1-2X. of the

total mineralization. The accompanying resistivity data would be

useful in describing any anomalies and structural anomalies and

bedrock changes.

-19-

ll l ll

wl

l(l

l l l liii iiFr* '

Vff. , ,

i

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION

I, Eduard H. Ludwig of Box 599 in the City of Timmins in

the Provice of Ontario,

DO HEREBY CERTIFY*

1) That I am a graduate of Sir Sandford Fleming College C19BO)

with a Geological Technicians Diploma, and Laurentian University

(1984) with the degree of Bachelor of Science (B.Se.) with honors

in Geological Science.

2) That I have been practising my profession as a Geologist and

engaged in exploration since 1980.

2) That this report is based on the author's field experience in

the area and on a comprehensive study of all assessment work

records and on geological maps and reports published for the area

by the Onatrio Ministry of Northern Development and Mines.

3) That I do not own directly or indirectly any securities of HSK

Minerals Ltd.

May 10,1988 Eduard H. Ludwig

Consulting Geologist

Timmins, Ontario, Can.

-20-

l'f''..'l

ll

i

i

l l lii l

APPENDICES

l l l

il li i i

i i i i i

iii l

APPENDIX A

iSCIIMTREXearth science division

Proton Precession Magnetometer for Portable or Base Station Use

l l l

; B

l

l

features

i l l l i i l

^

l

MP-2

7 gamma sensitivity and accuracy over range of 20,000 to 100,000 gammas.Operates in very high gradients, to 5000 gammas per metre.Ultra small size and weight.Up to 25,000 readings from only 8 D cells.Battery pack isolated from electronics for corrosion protection.Battery pack easily extended for winter use.Light-emitting diode digital display, with complete test feature.Unique no-glare polarized reflector permits easy reading in bright sunlight.Indicator light warning of excessive gradient, ambient noise or electronic failure.Digital readout of battery voltage.Rugged all metal housing for rough field use at all temperatures.Automatic recycling or external trigger features permit ready conversion to base station use.Short reading time.Broad operating temperature range.

The MP-2 Is a portable one gamma proton precession magnetometer for field survey or base station use. The optimized design of sen sor and circuitry using the latest CMOS com ponents has resulted In a very light weight, low power consumption, rugged and reliable magnetometer.

Light emitting diodes coupled with an In genious optically polarized reflector combine solid state reliability with easy reading even In bright sunlight.

A standard automatic recycling feature allows ready use of the MP-2, with suitable (optional) Interfacing,'as a base station recorder In analogue or dltlgal form. Alternatively, a remote trigger can be used.The noise-cancelling dual-coll sensor and elec tronics have been so designed as to effectively eliminate reading problems due to virtually all magnetic gradients which may be encountered In field survey conditions.

a world of discovery

l ll

TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF MP-2 (MAGNETOMETER SCINTREX

l

ll'

i i

l

i i iiii li l

RESOLUTION

TOTAL FIELD ACCURACY

RANGE

INTERNAL MEASURING PROGRAMME

EXTERNAL TRIGGER

DISPLAY

RECORDER OUTPUT (Optional)

GRADIENT TOLERANCE

POWER SOURCE

SENSOR

HARNESS

OPERATING TEMPERATURE TANGE

SIZE

WEIGHTS

1 Gamma.

± 1 Gamma over full operating range.20,000 to 100,000 gammas in 25 overlapping steps.

Single reading — 3.7 seconds. Recyc. feature permits automatic repetitive readlnqt, 3.7 seconds intervals.

External trigger Input permits use of sampling intervals longer than 3.7 seconds.5 digit LED (Light Emitting Diode) readout dis playing total magnetic field in gammas or nor- malized battery voltage.

Multiplied precession frequency and gate time outputs for interfacing with Incremental tape recorders (eg. Increlogger) for digital recor ding. As an additional option a digital to analogue converter Is available for use with analogue recorders.

Up to 5000 gammas/metre.

8 alkaline "O" cells provlce up to 25,000 readings at 25 e C under reasonable signal/noise conditions (less at lower temperatures). Premium carbon-zinc cells provide about 40V* of this number.Omnidirectional, shielded, noise-cancelling dual coil, optimized for high gradient tolerance.Complelo for operation with staff or back pack sensor.-350C to

Console, with batteries: 80 x 160 x 250mm. Sensor: 80 x 150mm. Staff: 30 x 1550mm. (extended)

30 x 600 mm. (collapsed)Console, with batteries: 1.8kg. Sensor: 1.3kg. Staff: 0.6kg.

SCINTREX LIMITED 222 Snldercroft Road,Concord. Ontario. Canada L4K 105 (net er-9-tseo. tfLCx vt-

l l l l

'•!

l

lt -:

lflT"i: -

l

l

iii

i i

K-

i

l

APPENDIX B

MAXMIM IIEM

l l l l

m Five frequencies: 22S, 444, BBS, 1777 and 3EBB Hz.m Maximum coupled t horizontal-loop ) operation with reference cable.m M inimum coupled operation with reference cable. m Vertical-loop operation without reference cable.m Coll separations: BB, BO, 1OO, 15O, BOO .and BBOm C with cable 3 or IDD, EDO, 300,400, BOO and BOO ft.m Reliable data from depths of up to ISO m CBOOftl.m Built-in voice communication circuitry with cable.m T ilt meters to control coil orientation.

P w 1 .- ' tW- "il^vW.

l l l l l ll

ll

ip^

lls ,'i ii i

BPECIFICATIONS :

Frequencies: 222. 444, BBS. 1777 and 3555Hz. Repeatability i

Modes of Operation; MAX: Transmitter coll plane and re ceiver coil plane horizontal (Max-coupled; Horizontal-loop mode). Used with refer, cable.

MIN: Trensmitter coil plane horizon tal and receiver coil plane ver tical (Min-coupled mode). Used with reference cable.

V.L. s Transmitter coil plane verti cal and receiver coil plane hori zontal (Vertical-loop mode). Used without reference cable , in parallel linea.

25,50.TOO. 15O.2OO S25Om (MMD) or 1OO, 2OO, SOO, 4OO,BOOend BOO ft. (MMEF). Coil separations in VL.mode not re- etricted to fixed valuee.

Parameters Read) - In-Phase and Quadrature compo nents of the aecondary field l n MAX and MIN modea.

- Tilt-angle of the total field in V.L. mode. '

O.25%tot1% normally, depending on conditione. frequenciea end coil separation used.

Transmitter Output i 222Hz :22OAtme444Hz i 2OO Atme BSBHz : 12OAtme

1777 Hz : BOAtme 3555 Hz i 3OAtme

Receiver Batteries) BV trans, radio type batteries (4). Life: approx. 35hrs. continuous du ty (alkaline, O.5 Ah), lees in cold weather.

Coil Separations!

Readouts!

Boale Ranges:

-Automatic, direct readout on 9Omm (3.5") edgewise metera in MAX end MIN modea. No null ing or compensation neceeaary .

- Tilt angle end null in BOmm edge wise meters in V.L. mode .

In-Phase: t2OV., 1OC^ by puah- button awitch .

Quadrature: 2O V.,*1OOV. by push button switch.

Tilt: 1 75V. slope.NulKVLJ: Sensitivity adjustable

by separation awitch.

Transmitter Batteries i

Referenoe Cable t

Voice Link i

Indicator Lights t

12V B Ah Gel-type rechargeable battery. (Charger supplied).

Light weight 2-conductor teflon cable for minimum friction. Unshield ed. All reference cables optional at extra coat. Please specify.

Built-in intercom system for voice communication between re ceiver end trensmltter operetore In MAX and MIN modes, vie re ference cable .

Built-in eignal and reference warn ing lighta to Indicate erroneous readings.

Readability: In-Phase and Quadrature : to O.BV. ; Tilt: 1V..

O.25 V.

Temperature Range: -4O*C to*SO*C (-4O*Fto*14CrF).

Receiver Weight) B kg (13 Ibs.)

Transmitter Weight: 13kg (29lbs.)

Shipping Weight) Typlcelly BOkg C135Ibs.), depend ing on quantities of reference cable and batteries included. Shipped in two field/shipping cases.

Specification* subject to change without notification -

PARAMETRICS LIMITED2OO STEELCASE RD. E.. MARKHAM, ONT. CANADA. L3R 1G2

B : (418) 495-1612 Cablea: APEXPARA TORONTO Telex i OB-968773 NORDVIK TOR

l

li

lii i

APPENDIX C

i iii ii ll i

Ministry of Geophysical-Geologlcal-Geochemlcal Northern Development Technical Data Statementand MinesV n ^ ]f: i ! '" 'I'"'r "^' ^r^^f.^^ff^f.'M.:V??^. 5 * :^•J/'.i-i^v, .': - ; '.'' - -.''.'i-.'- . " •:.-,-' -. ;,-V?.vi -'-f'' .''•- ! - ; '' v " File^^-.————

rV : TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT A;FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT : "7

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

o:-,'

Type ,of Survey(s),i\ Township or Area

•.

LIL

Claim,

^ KQ ne/

iof*

~ fi/t i i i

•..' t --.

ii i

Survey Company.. Author of Report. Address of Author J-^JL

\jLo.frA n

0/rfCovering Dates of Snrwy Ju.lv/ l- ~ flue,'?)/ M #7

' . l (linecuttingu/offioe) - ; v \t~

Total Miles of Line Cut.

•••- SPECIAL PRO VISIONS ; ; CREDITS REQUESTED ,;

. . :' n "- 1

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first i y "survey. l '' :' ~ - . \VENTER 20 days for each

, additional survey usingr same grid."'";, ,:": ;^;"j' : """:"".'

DAYS ''Geophysical y —Electromagnetic———Magnetometer.—Radiometric——Other—^——Geological.Geochemical,

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit* do not apply to airborne lurveyi) J

Magnetometer.•"' - - '-' --'V if • •- "'' ''- - : ;.'

DATEUJ '

.Electromagnetic. . Radiometric-' (enter dayi per claim)

SIGNATUREAuthor o? Reporflor Agent

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.

i i i i

Previous Surveys /- ; File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED ;; , List numerically

(number)

• ••••••l Jf **Af*Vi*rf*******t************flo*t***Hii*i*t********i.....4., ,.. . L ,. . . ^. .^ . . ,. . . . - .

t*tt***i*^{tMLH^'i'**H**

.,,,,.l^.fj^t),,,,M.5iX3i5.(,,,;,,J^^.5fti..,

**r^*f?*in ATn*T*************4**rm(*****nWt*f**: .' ; '."' '' '' ." X...... ,... ''' '"•'.' "*i

***i*n*t miTvlrfvvvVjif **************t*A*|*W**H**

••f'. r' ; ' :( ' -'

.. ;:i.-v"! -,1 .-, r:-i'

i

"TOTAL CLAIMS.

837 (85/12)

^r.^*?^':r'i:^:^r.i r*"v*^"*:'i^v*.*'r '^™^™1.'* 1 '^1 "''-'""- •'•"'-•'•'••'••^ ''. -..."••.•vv^!-.-*.: 'r^v*;*;**J.*T^e^^'vy^j^ - -;.-"t-..,.".,^.:-.--.(-^^^'-.'.-^- i

' ,. y GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA V: -,, ;,;, -. ' 1^x)U U'V''. Ofr'-'''*- 1 ' !'.'. :;P'i't:.'y- t.'' i: . ..i. s ^ : iv.;U.';'f,' . , . .' ' ' . .'. :-. ' 'V "( '""f !' '-I * k .

t-'-'t. ''^H '' J"-'--' 1 i| ; .''!'"'"'*fs''f - f^ii^ltyrt^SJi1^ l 1 ft 'j'.'tfiUiVr'i j! *^V'V'SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type pf.mrvey^. i, f \ V

Number of Stffti'"nf- *fi bo . Mo-if ^t'K J?-—--——-.^..Number of .Readings 3(72.0 r^f______, Line ^paring . j ^"5 M^———i yps ^ ' . .- - v ," - • ••."..••f'.r-!.:*' . ;'-.v ;v •••..j.v . :O A, '••••'" •"•••-'•:' '- V rS(^"^i^O-... V'-f?.--"-"- -

l l• Station interval

l

•fc -'i

If--:-

' 1 S\^ /-o

9 ;'-.'CJ ^;-'-' ' -; f,fr "- -,, ,.. ; J p ; Accuracy — Scale constant ———

V '* ' IW 7'-i ' ' ' ' - ' ' - ' ' "r" "' -"*JJ " ^"

•2*VftfoH

^ Diurnal correction method——KccT)

I ' jVrf . . . - '.* ' . . ', -' . - t Is Base Station check-in interval (hours).

.

fe1.•..rr*, :j ' ' '" ; "

" ? | A ' ;: Base Statipn( location and value.

l

i

-M.'.:ui;L,,'l

1 ' ; o

l l i

f- Instrument;il configuration —— i lQ if i ' 2-P "l f** f f- " X Af

^JL.' Coil separation (OO KM.t4! '-"-'/'^^Method: A " D Fixed transmitter^!^ D Shoot .backXf^:;': D In line

V ' 1777' ff^ " l(ipedfy V.L.F. lUtton)

Instrument.

d•vi-; Base station value and location,

accuracy. '.•• i --i*'^.'rtv^V*^^* : '^-:*1^-'.''?r*)-^*-v^jpnf:

i Instrumentzl!"' •'•- Method - D Time Domain :^i i . '*—~——* - .', , l)' '" " ^ ' "' \ .•'• v Parameters^On timeL^.

rw

, ! . ., ' Q Frequency Domain? '.'.'"'"' "'1;' ',,;'.,Frequency,-;';""

,-.. ... ^ , . r;Range

;; ^ ~ Delay time —— ;i-;.* 4 -.:— Integration time.

Power.Electrode arrayElectrode spacing .

t,..,:,,,..

|^;, Type of electrode

jtr

I23TaraUel line

-4

o

l l l l l l l l l l l l ll l lll l

SELF POTENTIAL ••• :-' ; : '; ' . ' '' ' ' \-' ' ''; ' - ' " ; " ; "./:''": f .' ;: ; ''7'' ; J v' "' '' '' : Instrument————————————————————————————————————— Range. Survey Method —————————————————————————————————————————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.-——Values measured.Energy windows (levels)__________' ' _______',,^——-.i-—-—^—Height of instrument________ ...'____' _________Background Count.•- - 1; -.': .;i.. ' - : ; ,'. .-, ,v. ' :' ' ; "'- - - l - ••- "'••••'- '• ! ', ' ' :Size of detector___________________________]-^—^^-^^^-^^-^.Overburden ____________________!—————————————^—--^^^^^.-^

. (type, depth — include outcrop nup) -

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.). , . ' . /'' " , i - . . ' T . IH ',(

Type of surveyInstrument ——---—------—^—-——-—-—^-—--—--—-Accuracy _______ ', —-^—.——-.—————--—--—Parameters measured

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s)———— Instrument(s) ——————

(specify for each type of lurvey)Accuracy.-——-.-.^——^^-.^.-.^^—

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used____________________ -'...'.—-.——-.-^.Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude—^_______' ______________Line Sparing, Miles flown over total area————————————————————————Over claims only.

l l GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

imbers of claims from which samples taken.

ttal Number of Samples. , pe of Sample——————

(Nature of Material)

terage Sample Weight———————— :thod of Collection—————————

tH Horizon Sampled. Iferizon Development, ftmple Depth————

Drainage Development——————————— Btimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

t

lSAMPLE PREPARATION

(Includes drying, screening, cruihing, uhing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis.

tneraL

I

T

ANALYTICAL METHOD3•- ' y . H-. - -f, . '.

Values expressed in: ' percent D""•""•'•'•' ~* " " --'-r^ ; v:--..--- —- p, p t m t ' Q

p. p. b. CD

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical i Reagents Used.

"' J Field Laboratory Analysis No,{________-—i i i - ' - ' - - s ' * .' . i. -, i;

Analytical Method. Reagents

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory—

' , ' ' " ] ' -'\'.''Extraction Method—-— Analytical Method —— Reagents '

General.

.tests)

.tests)

l,:(i,a: ( Ministry ofNorthern Development and Mines

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Gfiochfepiical and Expenn Oeocnernical and hxpenouj4 2 *11224

ooa•i. \fJ 8*C ti;r"t)

Mi.3.11234 BEEMER 900

Type of Sorvey(s)

H - 6 Township or Area

Claim Holder(s) Prospector's Licence No'T~7a?lAddress

gg)0- I IISurvey Company

i. . ,

i O*kftoMSH20iDate of Survey (from Si to)\ DI ri i /s

Day l Mo. | Yr. l Day | Mo. | Yr.

Total Miles of line Cut

37- sName and Ad ft r ess of Author (o* Gee-Technical report)

•EJu*rrl LuJw* " Boxiuii Duk/.'o

Credits Requested per Each Cliim in Columns at rightSpecial Provitiont

For f irst survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days [^ j;

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here A F

MINING

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Wi U', l: DR "isrw1"*

- Magnetometer

LAN^'-S^flON- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

Ho-LO

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)

:*n .'

Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claimd)

at the claim holder's Choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date Rejbjded Hb l der/or Xlgent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Total -^vered by this

report of work.

Date Approved as Recorded

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

.JI'Q 8oxS*?q Pgfgfc.jP/Vie..,vj bate Certified ed by

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand MinesMinistere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

June 15, 1988 Your File: W8806-068 Our file: 2.11224

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and Mines60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

RE: Notice of Intent dated May 30, 1988 ^- Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetome submitted on Mining Claims P 969247 et al in the Townships of English and Beemer——————

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

B' 1988

W.R. Cowan, ManagerMining Lands SectionMines and Minerals Division

Whitney Block, Room 6610 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

Telephone: (416) 965-4888

AB: piEnclosure: Technical Assessment Work Credits

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining b Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

H.S.K. Minerals Ltd.Suite 800111 Richmond Street WestToronto, OntarioM5H 2G4

Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario

, Mjnlstry of Northern Development and Mines

Technical Assessment Work Credits_

Ontario1

Date

June 9, 1988

File

2.11224Mlnlno Recorder's Report of Work No.

W8806-068AMENDED

Recorded Holder

townshipH.S.K. MineralsEnglish and Beemer

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Mining Claims Assessed

Geophysical Electromagnetic. 34

Magnetometer.

Radiometric_

17

Induced polarization.

Other————^

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

P 969247 to 60 inclusive 969263 to 66 inclusive 969346 to 51 inclusive 969903 to 07 inclusive 969928-29

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological _________________days

Geochemical ________________ days

Man days | |

Special provision QJ

Airborne l l

Ground (x]

Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

f'

J Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claimsnot sufficiently covered by the survey

P 969261-62 969342 to 45 inclusive 969930 987532

insufficient technical data filed

Li The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19)-60.

626 (85/12)

Hass

ard

Twp.

"M.9

21

H) G Q

S- CO

O)

CD

"V

S

SV

1 ! 3'

."**

o

-^

o^

oV

'3

r-K

|\! I

'l

i l•s

T l

tt

i *

u

'l

*

Jl

w

l -1

" l

**.J

SL J

^ L

'^.

j. -2

Lz'-4

— "

—i—

?1— -4

——

rK

x -

'HsT

r ~2

-S| /

*^^

"5 -oi

5 T

~s

(D

"O O

Engl

ish

Twp.

, M

.787

D

R 13

O 2

3- S

>

H2

o O

S1

S Z rn en

H m U)

m

*P

r m Q m z D

U)

O

> r m "Z. o I O

i2o I z en

2 2-D

z

o o

g <m

O Z

(7)

U)C

H

O

33g

o33

H

K o

H

I m

00 z 0) I

Bartlett Twp.-M.262

02^629 1027618 .998469 199648

p ip1027619

998490JI037322 l (03731/1003168 l

P P Ip |P P 1027627 ' 1027620 I99B49I 11037321

11031398 11031397 , !03!3p—k- --*O(\ \f Wo373l6i'003185V ii0373l9j^ — JA— — — ilQOff|

1031700 ' 1031701 l IQ3I694 "l W l

l j Jp3l683]| 031681 ^1031^^103168^1"p IP ^ P* IP r

L |p | p /i

983122 Q 1028328

—— —— —— —— —— -4 |P l

X IjLBTITT. J'Ji

•9G92/3 l 9*3^6' TZf'BJia^a |fMcTy|Bt"^T— F — - *—

'

L IL \ L ;LP996973 |p *P*9772I !P997720

, i 9969721^ ___1 ___ T ___l( -^-4-

i l L l L . l—i __-l L lP997706 P997707^99770B

r7 fi n L fl-jfli. j j K R Q ? , l 7 ? R\flO3 ^T P fi 7 O ^

L L i L i L \ l LP997702 P997695[P997694

^ A - — i— _ _ _ _ _ _ i--'-''"" r~t- --""yj -_ _P966769 P996975 | **7704JP9977001 ^97B97 l P99T696\^

'986770 l R9867GBIP996976 i P997703, P997699,P99769B

'-3 i-* v v 9v r i * f v r u p j t -*-* w J ' ^ * p v u u -71 P 5 ft 6 9 l -X 244^-4 UAA^ TW UPVI

r L l L i r "" ,L [L —--[7 ~~ - i|P98677I IP9B6767| P9B6763P99T7I3 P9977I4

- "1

s*Ef388aPi^o flSiji^i S ** i

. Sempl-rTwp.-M.NOO( 42A*3See218 3.11224 BEEMER

Bob K l .

THE TOWNSHIP" OF "

ENGLISHDISTRICT

SUDBURY

PORCUPINEMINING DIVISION .

SCALE:MNCH-4O CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLEDPATENTED S.R O

c.e

NOTES400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all ./lakes ana - rivers.

^Tas withdrawn from staking under Sectionof the Mining Act t H.ro. 1970).

**v j; No F ile Date DispositionW 16/77

W. 19/7 B ff 30/78

63502

188343 IO/1/78 ?. / 6 / 7 H

S. R O,

S-fl.O.S R. D.

APR S 1988

PLAN NO M.787

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES' ' SURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

o LOIO CM

CD

CM ...J

3: o o

m CM

in r- K)

CM -J

Q m CM CM -J

m CM

CM

O O o CM -l

00

o mCM

o

o

min

N-

roO m CM -J

m

CMc c o _l

o LO

CM

ir: ..j

8+oc

N

OGN

400

-fv

700

635

~670

-6

80 628

l- 60

1i

645

^605

-5

89 ,

"572

^ 50

5h6

06

-l 62

6650

^67

6-6

94

-l 63

2

624

r63

l 694

*-64

5 j-

640

•J 66

4 1-

629

j-66

2 l- 6

96

617

MU

SK

A S

EN

D A

L

AK

E

-532

-520

551

-565

-538

^-4

8CT

-335

W32

6J 3

22 322

/, *l

69!

-69

7-6

3 670

6^6,6

1648

-906

•917

2900-^

-294

-9^9

^890

-860

85

6

1-87

5

221

2162

2139

2301

1000

910

90 89

483

1

H64

0 H

642

1267

12

33

I230

/20

6 l

1152

1197

3- ,fl

pQ /600 2.1

1224

E. L

UCW

1G 8

^ AS

SOCI

ATES

INST

RUME

NT:

Scin

trex

MP-

2 Pr

oton

Pre

cess

ion

Mag

neto

met

erPA

RAME

TRES

MEA

SURE

D:

Earth

's T

oW M

agne

tic F

ield

ACCU

RACY

: */

- 10

gam

mas

OIUR

NALS

: Co

rrect

ed b

y Ba

se L

ine L

oopin

gCO

NTOU

R IN

TERV

AL:-*

-/- I

OO g

amm

asCONTOURED

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

o

42Aa3SE9219 2.11224 BEEMER

ea©

d"M

MS

.*p:1

"M**

lfc"M

o

-st, f

C'x

i

-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 -2—

——

— 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 o -1 -2 -2

-1 + 1.

- (T ^ * 1 -2 -3 -U -3 -2 -2 -2 -1 -1 -2

^^2

0

r;r2

L !i-2

1 2

f2 -!i-2

i;. 2

Ti-2

*j~2

J !i-2 /'.-2

•-K

i

•H -

t-

V-2

'.(-^

.Ji-2

1-1

j-1

••I fi'

V'^2 -i 2 ^3

#-1 lw /r*'-i

! Lf 2 *-2

-Ai

*-y -^7

41

'Z?

1 il 2

-y"

1

^7

'li

-1 -1 -1 -1

-1

969926 -1 -1 -1

-1 -2 -1 -1 ri -1 0 -i -2

9693*V

-2

0 -1 -1 -2 -1 -1 ? i -2 -2 -2

96

92

65

- —

——

——

— - —

——

—

A

i- 'j-1

-#0

rf^ +

2

ti •-V2

4-2

r!f2

-i/2 if 1-1 1-1

- i-i -i S-1 V lil Vr2 7-1 K! i2 4-2

T"

1

iiM 11 i/3 "

-1 -1 -1 -2 -2 -1 -1 -2 -3 -2 -1 0 -2 -1 -2 -1 -1 -1 + 1 -1

-1 -1 0 -1 -1 -o 0 +1 0 -1 -2 ...V

.

,*-1

^2 !r2 y 4 - 1 V2|

•A 1 i^-i l: ' Vi ^7 *-

L

f2 i-i 1 2 /i-2 V2 f-1 1-1

.4-1l

1i-1

i-1

-T^-

2-k-

1f i-

1*-1 .1-

1 i

- "r

O LO

Is- C\J

vn CM

O)

C\J .J

O OJ

ro

c\i .J

i;

"^ "- -^ o o

LO N-

00

O LO

N-

in C^J

CD

O

O LO J

LO

i^ ro .J

O LOC

LO N-

COLO r-

BL

17^5

05

MA

X-M

IN

3CO

NDUC

TOR

-30

AXIS

2OO

OS

22+O

OS

24-O

OS

LEGE

ND

INST

RUM

ENT:

Ape

x Pa

ram

etric

s M

ax-M

in 1

1 HO

PE:

Maxim

um C

oupl

ed,

Horiz

onta

l Lo

op S

urve

y PA

RAM

ETRE

S ME

ASUR

ED:

Inph

ase

(V.|

Out

of p

hase

[Va

l FR

ECLU

ENCY

: 41

4 HZ

CO

IL SE

PARA

TION

: OP

ERAT

OR:

PROF

ILE

SCAL

E:JO

HN

:1

UJ:

-

l .m

- i

C7o

- 2 r 2

-i /-i

-i -i-i

-2 f 1

O A

-2o

!;-i

-2

V2

O 4

-2+1

/1-1

O U

-2-2

^-

1O

A-2

-1

..-2

-i p

-1 k-2

-i ;- 2

o J-

2

:! ?,~1

-1 M

-1

k-2

-i !i-2

*1

l '-

9*

l 'ir-

/- 1

r 1-1

l\-

2-2

-t

2

96

93

46

96

934

596

9 2

44

O V

.

O o -1 -2

969542

96

93

43

-E?.

:. A

'•\*L

9893

81

-L -1M

- 7 2

r L : -2 1

-1l

' :

-2

-1-

-2 .2i

-2-

-2 -2 -2 -2n •1 -2 0 0 -1 - 0 ,

+1 J '

-1 -2 -

-1 -1 \ '

-1 •!- 1 +1 \

-i j :? •o i -2 -1 T

-1

-

•

Jk-2

-J

J-

2 "

-2 -

* 7

•f-1

~

L

atl

" 2-p

^

i-2

"l

-T2

~ 1

f 2

- 1 -

4-

2 -2

4-2

-24-

2 -2

]-2

-2.

4-2

-2-1

-2

-1|-

2

-2/j-

1 -2

-,

J+1

-2J-

1 -2

3^

2- —

——

T2-n

i2 - 2 1

7 0

fit- 2

0

U-2

-1

^ fi

-1

-42

o

M?

17 t

~

l

lfl

-1

) 2

o -

42

.3f 1

J 9- 2

•1*2

i'*2

Q

-r 1

-i^2

.1

4-

1 -2

"TT?

——

42

o .

•f2

-2^2

-1

-1

2

.1

,j 'L?

o

'*ri

-t/

'

^

-^:*-

2 o

^V

74-

2 -1

f-1

-1 -1 -1~

-- - —

——

4i2

-1

^1

-2H

f-2

-1

J-2

.i^h

-4—

Ai1

"ir

2 "j

fc

:l-4

9

-1r f-2

-1

4-2

- 1|-

2

0 -

J-2

-1*-1

-4

-1

'

J 2

9*9"

*Q

\

j- 2 ^

4-2

-1

'J-2

^

XH?-

1 0

Xf"

1 " 1

f ~ 2

" 1

J-1

0 -

f-1

-1

IT ^ ^

\2

-3-

^1

-4i/1

- 2AM

0

;li

-1 -

f2

-1

f 2

-2fi

oiM

—

— 0—

M

o ,

l' O

•f

— 7

H

h U

i2

7/li

~IJ-

2 n

-/!

u

-ir

2 -1

l2

-2^2

-1

/--

'"'"'-l

l-':

- 1l-'1

-1V 2

-i

nf?

" 1

r1

-1.

t? i/ r 1 P '

*-1 /' i-i i-i ^"? li 2

42

4-1 i" 1 n i-2 J/-1

T-1

1-1

5 1.7

^

y ^

^1 H2 •X r 1 t\-2

A-2 f:! ^

— 1 —

——

—

i-2 ' i r 1 b i- 2 S-

1 i-2 .4^2 h

2jf-

2it-

2

* -*

7

: *3

--?"-7

*-^

I

' 96

9Z3B

~*

-^

; l

)

M

' —

-^

\ y

'

*2^-

1

; --

2^-2

*2' :*

-1

' '

-2

"S-1

i•

3 4

- 1

, ___

-'

-1

-^-^

1

-•—

A .

. -^ —

—

- y

oTi

+1*.

;-!

i o

-jf-

2/

i *?

\-5u2

'(

'0

^-2

'*i\ij'-

) .

U

i f

*-

*i^-i

i: J

- i l 0

n nJ

-1

! -

7-^-

1U

/'

f '

- "

'.I*^

' I4-2

'' i

- 1 Ji-

17

J-

li y/

1

^!l-1

^•p

f3

\\

^ ,7

- 2

ji-

10

^-1

V

/'X

- 1

^-1

r

\^

-" ^-

^ '

!10

H-2

\\

"'^^

*~ " l

^"

1-2

f 2

^T

^"^

-2

*-1

-1

1-1

o -H

- 9

692"

-i f-1

-i

1-1-i-

\- 1

-2 -t

2 - 1

n|-1

~ 1 " ~

1-2

fr1

.2

|2

-2

|fj

-1

71

|-1

-1-1

-1

-1 -

|!i-2

-2

-jl-i

*1 J

ji-2

-1

J--]

-2 If 2

-1

4~2

-1

U-2

0 -L

i -1

|f-

1 -1

S

-2

j-1

ji-1

-i . L o

-i

!3-i

-i -to

-i

Hf-1

-2-1

-0

-1 -

i|.-1

-2

-j;-

1 -2

-i^-1

9

id

1 1

lil

1 O

iii-1

1

Ut-

1— z

v~

i —

if"1

~ z.

i"\

— i r

'^ i

r? |

T

1

* '

— J

j ^

TV

J

V

-1 p

0

.^2

+1/

4-2

1+1

;4-2

-Hi- 2

M ^

i3

+

VJ-2

0

-J^2

:

-2

e-1

0 -^

2 *2

; J4

-2

0 U

-2^

36

9Z

5G

-

1 l

' h

.1

,i—

1

+1

- —

k."

^ *?

' ""i.^

—1

W—

1

li

'p'

l ,'

('

*?/

; 1

~ 1

l^2

* 1

i^"

1 0

i ^1

*V-f

f2

0 - f

f2

+1

**-1

!Q

-V-1

J 4

-2

.1 (f

2 .1

fe

-2

-+1

/H

0 V

2

0 V

i .1

!M

-l .1

^1

i -2

4-

2 .1

'i-

1

.1

|lf-i

l r

^

-)

l' 1

n

\"', f

'i

1 M

;

' -5 ^

- 2 f

2 o

I-i

-5

[*'-

-2

ti-2

^

U-2

-4

-W

-4

ff]-2

0 fi-2

i-4

-iM

-3

-JM

i .1

^'-1

i

i ir

i i

li^

.L 9

-+ 1

f-1

-4

*-

1 -1

w

-2

; -1

V-

1 -3

M

/2

Q M

t J

' |

n ^

-1

Ji-2

.3

-*

I2

.1

iV-1

i

C0

Yi-2

-^

-/]-

| i

J-1

:

'-^-1

li 2

...-4

T-5

i-1

n i-1

!

C'J

-1

J*-2

-4

ii-

fl i

-ti-1

'

—'[ -

2 *- 2

-4 iUi

o

Vi

i0

1-1

-143

^2

0 i-1

!*Y

^2

0 i-1

-1

&-

1*2

!j-2

-1

|-

1

-2

HM _

_ ^

i i-

-1

J -4

-——

"T

2 . 1122 4

E. L

UDW

IG

a AS

SOCI

ATES

MA

X-M

IN

II444

Hz

1:50

0042A03SE*21* 2.11224 BEEMER

230

O

y") KiC

J .j

f™*- V.-

- c CSi

X)

rr*

OLO CM

CO

BS o o inro

Co CM

4-C

ON

2+O

ON

BL

0+

00

2+O

OS

4+O

OS

6+O

OS

8+O

OS

TELL

UR

IDE

B

AY

MU

SKAS

END

A LA

KE

-2

-2

Bea

ver

Pon

d

IOO

OS

14+O

OS

16+O

OS

BL I

7+50

S

18+O

OS

20-t-

OO

S

22+O

OS

?4*O

OS

o

o

o ro

OQ

S

6-O

OS

8+O

OS

12+O

OS

14+O

OS

16*0

03

iB+O

OS

2.

11224

LEGE

ND

INST

RUME

NT:

Apex

PvM

Mtr

fcs

Max-

Min

11 HO

PE:

Maxk

fium

Coup

lid,

Iterh

onW

Loo

p Su

rvey

PA

RAME

TOES

MEA

SUftE

D: I

nphw

t (V

*lOu

t of

pfta

sc

SEPA

RATI

ON:

[COM

O

PgUT

OR:

JQ

riN H

USSE

Y SC

ALE:

ELU

DWIG

ASSO

CIA

TES

MA

X-M

IN

IIO

;t

m

f17

77

Hz

O