1 Parametric Polymorphism Polymorphism Techniques C++ Templates.
Genetic polymorphism at nine STR loci in two ethnic groups of China
Click here to load reader
Transcript of Genetic polymorphism at nine STR loci in two ethnic groups of China
Announcement of population data
Genetic polymorphism at nine STR loci in two
ethnic groups of China
Teng Chen, Shengbin Li*
Department of Forensic Science, Medical College of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, PR China
Received 24 September 2003; received in revised form 2 February 2004; accepted 5 April 2004
Available online 17 June 2004
Abstract
Genotype polymorphism studies at nine short tandem repeat (STR) loci (D3S1358, FGA, TH01, D7S820, VWA, CSF1PO,
D5S818, D13S317, TPOX) were carried out in two Ethnic Groups (Tu, Sala) living in Qinhai, a North–West province of China.
All loci were in accordance with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P ¼ 0:05).
# 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Forensic science; Short tandem repeats (STR); Population genetics; China
Population: The Tu (n ¼ 120) and Sala (n ¼ 125) Ethnic
Group selected for present study living in Qinhai belong to
North–West China. Blood samples were collected from
unrelated healthy individuals who self-declared their ethnic
origin over four generations.
Extraction: Genomic DNA was extracted by the salting
out method and quantified with electrophoresis.
PCR: Amplification was performed using 5 ng genomic
DNA of template according to the manufacture’s protocol
[1] (AmpF‘STR1 ProfilerTM PCR Amplification kit,
Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA).
Typing: The amplified DNA products were separated
and detected using an ABI PrismTM377 DNA sequencer
(Applied Biosystems). The resultant data analysis and allele
designation were carried out using the GeneScanTM and
GenotypeTM softwares.
Analysis of date: To check genetic stability of Tu and
Sala Ethnic Groups, the allele frequencies data were ana-
lyzed based upon Hardy–Weinberg probability test. The
discrimination power (DP), paternity of exclusion (CE)
and the heterozygosity (H) were calculated [2,3].
Results: The DP, CE, H, and the polymorphism informa-
tion content (PIC) for the nine STR loci in Tu and Sala ethnic
groups from China are given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.
Access to date: The complete data are available to any
interested reader upon request made to Shengbin Li, MD,
Forensic Science International 146 (2004) 53–55
Table 1
Allele frequency for nine STR loci in Tu population of China (n ¼ 120)
Allele D3S1358 VWA TH01 FGA TPOX CSF1PO D5S818 D7S820 D13S317
5 – – 0.0096 – – – – – –
6 – – 0.0913 – 0.0048 – – – –
7 – – 0.2548 – 0.0192 0.0048 0.0096 0.0096 0.0048
8 – – 0.0913 – 0.4952 – 0.0096 0.1827 0.2260
9 – – 0.4663 – 0.1394 0.0240 0.0673 0.0865 0.1106
9.3 – – 0.0625 – – – – – –
10 – – 0.0240 – 0.0192 0.2019 0.2308 0.1250 0.1442
* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ86-29-82656244; fax: þ86-29-82656244.
E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Li).
0379-0738/$ – see front matter # 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.004
Table 1 (Continued )
Allele D3S1358 VWA TH01 FGA TPOX CSF1PO D5S818 D7S820 D13S317
11 – – – – 0.2981 0.2644 0.3462 0.3029 0.2452
12 – – – – 0.0240 0.4471 0.1923 0.2404 0.1971
13 – 0.0048 – – – 0.0529 0.1346 0.0481 0.0577
14 0.0481 0.2115 – – – 0.0048 0.0048 0.0048 0.0096
15 0.3510 0.0288 – – – – 0.0048 – 0.0048
15.2 0.0048 – – – – – – – –
16 0.3606 0.1923 – – – – – – –
17 0.1490 0.2837 – – – – – – –
18 0.0817 0.1731 – 0.0529 – – – – –
19 0.0048 0.0913 – 0.0817 – – – – –
20 – 0.0096 – 0.0577 – – – – –
20.2 – – – 0.0048 – – – – –
21 – – – 0.0913 – – – – –
21.2 – – – 0.0048 – – – – –
22 – – – 0.1587 – – – – –
22.2 – – – 0.0048 – – – – –
23 – – – 0.2308 – – – – –
23.2 – – – 0.0240 – – – – –
24 – – – 0.1202 – – – – –
25 – – – 0.0962 – – – – –
25.2 – – – 0.0096 – – – – –
26 – – – 0.0481 – – – – –
27 – – – 0.0048 – – – – –
28 – – – 0.0048 – – – – –
29 – – – 0.0048 – – – – –
H 0.7156 0.7985 0.6963 0.8736 0.6452 0.6860 0.7671 0.7916 0.8135
PD 0.8560 0.9257 0.8632 0.9691 0.7964 0.8504 0.9084 0.9197 0.9289
CE 0.5722 0.7410 0.5856 0.8838 0.4610 0.5015 0.6480 0.7219 0.7417
PIC 0.7089 0.7871 0.6888 0.8735 0.6353 0.6569 0.7436 0.7771 0.8043
H: observed heterozygosity; DP: discrimination power; CE: paternity of exclusion; PIC: polymorphism information content.
Table 2
Allele frequency for nine STR loci in Sala population of China (n ¼ 125)
Allele D3S1358 VWA TH01 FGA TPOX CSF1PO D5S818 D7S820 D13S317
6 – – 0.0847 – – – – – –
7 – – 0.2661 – 0.0040 – 0.0121 – 0.0040
8 – – 0.0323 – 0.5081 – 0.0040 0.1895 0.2460
9 – – 0.5081 – 0.1210 0.0323 0.0605 0.0645 0.1008
9.3 – – 0.0968 – – – – – –
10 – – 0.0121 – 0.0605 0.2782 0.2298 0.2097 0.1290
11 – – – – 0.2823 0.2581 0.3750 0.3065 0.2460
12 – – – – 0.0202 0.3831 0.1976 0.1694 0.1734
13 0.0040 – – – 0.0040 0.0323 0.1210 0.0605 0.0766
14 0.0524 0.1653 – – – 0.0161 – – 0.0242
15 0.3468 0.0323 – – – – – – –
16 0.3387 0.3065 – – – – – – –
17 0.2218 0.2702 – – – – – – –
18 0.0363 0.1371 – 0.0202 – – – – –
19 – 0.0806 – 0.0565 – – – – –
20 – 0.0081 – 0.0363 – – – – –
21 – – – 0.1411 – – – – –
21.2 – – – 0.0040 – – – – –
54 T. Chen, S. Li / Forensic Science International 146 (2004) 53–55
Department of Forensic Science, Medical College of Xi’an
Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, PR China.
Other remarks: All loci were found to be highly poly-
morphic and no deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equili-
brium was observed in the two ethnic groups (P ¼ 0:05).
The discrepancy of the two ethnic groups in this study is not
notable, but they are different compared to Kazak ethnic
group of China for TH01 locus. We also compared the two
ethnic groups with Han nation population and Japanese
population, respectively, there are no significant differences
observed [4–6].
This paper follows the guidelines for publication of
population data requested by the journal [7].
Acknowledgements
This Study is supported by National Nature Science
Foundation of China (grant no. 39970401). The authors
are thankful to Dr. Jianghua Lai and Yanjiong Chen for
their assistance.
References
[1] AmpF‘STR ProfilerTM PCR Amplification Kit User’s Manual.
PE Applied Biosystems, San Jose CA, 1998.
[2] Y. Ohno, I.M. Sebetan, S. Akaishi, A simple method for
calculating the probability of excluding paternity with any
number of codominant alleles, Forensic Sci. Int. 19 (1982)
93–98.
[3] M. Nei, A.K. Roychoudhury, Sampling variances of hetero-
zygosity and genetic distance, Genetics 76 (1974) 379–390.
[4] K. Yoshida, N. Mizuno, K. Fujii, H. Senju, K. Sekiguchi, K.
Kasai, H. Sato, Japanese population database for nine STR loci
of the AmpF‘STR Profiler kit, Forensic Sci. Int. 132 (2003)
166–167.
[5] X.H. Wang, S.H. Gao, J.H. Lai, S.B. Li, STR data for the
AmpF‘STR1 ProfilerTM loci from Sinkiang NW China,
Forensic Sci. Int. 129 (2002) 214–215.
[6] S.B. Li, J.D. Feng, S.D. Li, J.L. Yu, H.M. Yang, GeneScan
for STR analysis and genetic distribution in a population
sample from Han, China, Acta Genet. Sin. 27 (6) (2000)
477–484.
[7] P. Lincoln, A. Carracedo, Publication of population data of
human polymorphisms, Forensic Sci. Int. 110 (2000) 3–5.
Table 2 (Continued )
Allele D3S1358 VWA TH01 FGA TPOX CSF1PO D5S818 D7S820 D13S317
22 – – – 0.1653 – – – – –
22.2 – – – 0.0202 – – – – –
23 – – – 0.1613 – – – – –
23.2 – – – 0.0363 – – – – –
24 – – – 0.2016 – – – – –
25 – – – 0.1008 – – – – –
25.2 – – – 0.0040 – – – – –
26 – – – 0.0363 – – – – –
27 – – – 0.0161 – – – – –
H 0.7118 0.7794 0.6533 0.8677 0.6435 0.7069 0.7491 0.7897 0.8157
PD 0.8650 0.9113 0.8342 0.9629 0.8142 0.8672 0.9008 0.9277 0.9336
CE 0.5802 0.7028 0.5295 0.8630 0.4824 0.5005 0.6107 0.6854 0.7580
PIC 0.6997 0.7624 0.6468 0.8675 0.6352 0.6869 0.7217 0.7752 0.8081
H: observed heterozygosity; DP: discrimination power; CE: paternity of exclusion; PIC: polymorphism information content.
T. Chen, S. Li / Forensic Science International 146 (2004) 53–55 55