Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

download Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

of 56

Transcript of Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    1/56

    Generation Y

    as hospitalitY

    industrY emploYeesAn examination of work attitude differences

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    2/56

    UQ School of Tourism

    The University o Queensland (UQ) is one o Australias

    premier learning and research institutions and is ranked

    among the worlds top 50 Universities. It is the oldest

    university in Queensland and has over 40,000 students

    currently enrolled. UQ is a ounding member o the elite

    Group o Eight (Go8), a coalition o leading Australian

    universities, intensive in research and comprehensive in

    general and proessional education.

    Nested in the aculty o Business, Economics and Law, the

    UQ School o Tourism (UQST) is the earliest established

    university tourism school in Australia, and is the only

    dedicated tourism school within the Go8. The UQST is the

    only University School in Australia to be TedQual accredited

    by the United Nations World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO).

    With over 700 students studying under- and post-graduate

    programs in tourism, hospitality and event management, the

    UQST is recognised, both nationally and internationally, as

    a leading centre o research with close links to government

    and industry. An impressive list o academic sta actively

    publish their research in the worlds top journals in tourism,

    hospitality and related felds and are o ten called upon to

    speak both nationally and internationally, and consult on

    tourism and related matters.

    For more inormation, go to www.uq.edu.au

    Hospitality Training Association

    The Hospitality Training Association Inc (HTA) has been

    serving the needs o the hospitality industry or over twenty

    years. HTA brings together the combined experience

    and knowledge o the fve major associations that are the

    driving orce behind the tourism and hospitality industries in

    Queensland, Australia: the Hotel Motel & Accommodation

    Association; Clubs Queensland; the Restaurant & Catering

    Association o Queensland; the Liquor, Hospitality& Miscellaneous Union; and the Queensland Hotels

    Association.

    Developed to support these associations with specialised

    training in each o their areas o discipline and expertise, HTA

    has assisted thousands o young people establish careers

    in hospitality and tourism. Through the provision o short

    courses, certifcates and diploma qualifcations, HTA College

    provides nationally and internationally recognised training

    in all acets o tourism and hospitality. Situated close to the

    city-centre in Fortitude Valley, HTA's training acilities include

    three commercial kitchens, a pastry lab, two restaurants,

    a cocktail/lounge bar, and multimedia-equipped training

    rooms.

    For more inormation, go to www.hta.org.au

    Acknowledgement: Hotel room photo on front

    cover courtesy of Hilton Hotels and Resorts

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    3/56

    1An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

    7 bruary, 2011

    d r,

    ths rpr aas r a cls wrkg parrshp bw ur rspcv sus. W hav ud gra syrgs bw

    h Hspaly trag Assca a wrld class prva rag rgasa ad h Schl turs a h Uvrsy

    Quslad rakd ag h wrlds tp 50 Uvrss. ths rpr rprss a ubr cllabrav prjcs br

    u ur cpra.

    Hr, w prs h rsuls a rsarch prjc ha had s bggs as a dusry prbl: h challgs , ad h d

    ga a br udrsadg abu Gra Y as hspaly dusry plys. oc hs d was dfd, a cprhsv

    ad rbus rsarch prgra was dsgd ad s dald hs rpr. (n: W wuld als lk ackwldg h crbu

    ad hs prjc by Dr Paul Barr wh has sc rlcad napr Uvrsy Sclad. Paul was a par h rgal

    rsarch a ad was gral h ra ad arly sags h rsarch prjc.)

    th rsarch dsg r hs prjc cludd:

    acomprehensivereviewofalltherelevantpastresearchundertakenregardinggenerationaldifferencesinworkforceattitudes;

    focusgroupstoeshoutthekeyissues;

    theselectionofkeyemployeecriteriamostvaluableintermsofunderstandingdifferencesacrossgenerationalgroups;

    thecreationofaquestionnairedesignedtocaptureactualemployeeattitudes;

    thecollectionofdataacrossdifferentsectorsofthehospitalityindustryinQueensland;

    acomprehensiveandstatisticallyrobustanalysisofthedata;

    somepracticalsuggestionsabouthowtointerpretandusethedata.

    Lg br hs prjc ccd, bca bvus ay ha ply va, larg syls, pcas,

    prrac ad hr rlad acrs vary r r r ay pssbl rass (graal grupg, gdr, dpar,ccupa c.). t da, hwvr, ll scfc vdc has b gahrd rvw hs drcs ad ga a ull

    udrsadg h, spcally as hy pra h hspaly dusry.

    W hp yu fd hs rpr usul, ad w wlc cs ad dback.

    Rgards,

    Plp cl d d sl

    c e o G Y r P L

    Hspaly trag Assca Uvrsy Quslad, Schl turs

    Email:[email protected] Email:[email protected]

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    4/56

    2 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    ecuvSuary

    eply ply

    y b

    . o p, ply glbl y,

    pg bl

    pp,

    ly y l,

    -p, y g. o

    , y lg

    b by l

    ,

    ll- ply.

    may hs ssus s r h

    hr characrscs ad cds

    h dusry .g. s ppl--

    ppl racs, a-scal wrkg

    hurs, ad a pr rpua as a lg-

    r carr p. thr ar pr

    apls hspaly rgasas

    arud h glb ha hav sugh

    cba s hs c

    ssus, alhugh v hy hav b

    challgd by h las hua rsurc

    ssu cr h dusry h

    rac Gra Y (G Y) as h

    ws chr hspaly plys.

    Wh radcally dr wrk-rlad

    valus ad auds prvusgras, h G Y ply has

    cudd wrkplacs arud h

    glb. As a radal plyr

    yugr sa, h hspaly dusry

    has b parcularly acd by hs

    w gra. thr s uch hyp

    surrudg G Y plys h

    ppular da, y hr s ll prcal

    vdc suppr ay h clas

    ad abu h. Rsarch ha has

    b cducd da has b sall-

    scal ad largly dscrpv aur,

    ad has rarly ak h spcfc c

    h hspaly dusry accu.

    Rcgsg hs shrcg, h basc

    as h prjc wr :

    reviewanddistilthecurrentliterature

    abu ply wrk auds ad

    GenY;

    identifyrelevant(academic/

    practical)areasforresearch;

    examinearangeofwork-related

    audal ad bhavural

    csrucs cparg G Y

    othergenerationalgroups;

    developpracticalsolutionsand

    apprachs r hspaly wrs

    ad aagrs.

    ths rpr syhsss h fdgs

    a hr-yar rsarch prjc ad

    a br udrsadg h pac

    h ws ad s--b largs

    gra plys w h

    hspaly dusry. Udrpg

    hs rpr s h prs ha hr

    s rus valu prgrssg ur

    udrsadg h ccs

    bw ply auds ad

    prcps hr wrk vr,

    ad dsrd rgasaal ucs

    such as cusr sasac, cusr

    lyaly, wrd uh advcacy,

    rvu grwh ad prfably.

    icludd hs rpr ar h rsuls

    sascal aalyss ru a survy

    vr 900 hspaly plys

    Queensland.Thequestionnairewas

    dsgd cllc ra

    ply dgraphc varabls, as

    wll as a slc asurs dd

    capur crcal ply auds

    ad ps rgardg hr wrk

    vr. th cludd asurs

    wr slcd basd a sablshd

    lk wh psv rgasaal

    ucs.

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    5/56

    3An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

    Chaprs 1 ad 2 prvd a backgrud

    h rsarch prbl wh a plaa

    h ply auds ha wrdfd as pval bh succssully

    aagg G Y ad achvg pal

    busss ucs h hspaly

    dusry. Chaprs 3 ad 4 dscrb

    h hds ad fdgs r h survy

    phas daa cllc, hghlghg h

    Ten Key Findings (pag 33).

    ms ably ad s rlva hs

    rpr s h spl ac ha G Y

    plys scr lwr audal

    asurs ha a rgasa shuld

    b apg as, ad hghr

    hs whch shuld b lwr. i hr

    wrds, G Y plys ar LeSS

    sasfd wh hr jbs, LeSS gagd

    hr wrk, ad LeSS cd

    h rgasa hy wrk r ha

    hr -G Y curpars. Slarly,

    G Y plys dsplay hghr scrs

    h csrucs ha a rgasa

    wuld wa s s sa.r apl, G Y plys ar

    MORElikelytobeplanningtoquittheir

    jbs, moRe lkly prr prly

    hr c-wrkrs ar dg s, ad ar

    als moRe lkly swch jbs r

    parcular ras.

    Chaprs 5 ad 6 prvd a dald

    dscuss h rsuls as wll as a Ten

    Recommendations or Managing Gen

    Ysc (pag 38) whch ar draw

    r h rsuls hs prjc ad

    whch, pld wh h G Ywrkrc, wll lkly prv h vrall

    wrk prrac hs graal

    grup ad hrr bf ly h

    dvdual hspaly busss, bu als

    h dusry as a whl.

    th rpr ccluds Chapr 7 wh

    somereectionsandnalremarks.

    Sgfca drcs s h

    auds G Y plys h

    wrkplac. ths sudy s h

    frs cllc prcal daa b

    abl spcy wha h drcs

    ar, ad hw hy wll pac h

    aag plys hspaly

    bussss. ths rsarch rprss,

    h had, a ap fll a

    gap h acadc lraur rgardg

    graal drcs wrk-rlad

    auds ad valus. o h hr had,

    ad r praly r hspaly

    busss wrs ad prars,

    hs rsarch has prvdd praccal

    rcdas, basd scfc

    vdc, as hw bs gag wh

    hs graal grup h hspaly

    wrkplac.

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    6/56

    4 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    7/56

    5An exAminAtion o work attitude differences

    executive summary 2

    List of figures 6

    1 Background to the generation y Project 8

    1.1 Wha s a gra ad hw ds uc h wrkplac? 9

    1.2 Wha aks Gra Y ck? 9

    1.3 Lkg ply auds busss succss 11

    2 what we measured and why 14

    2.1 Jb Sasac 14

    2.2 eply egag 15

    2.3 orgasaal Czshp Bhavur 16

    2.4 orgasaal C 16

    2.5 Prcvd Suprvsry ad orgasaal Suppr 17

    2.6 Prcvd arss 17

    2.7 trag ad Dvlp opprus 17

    2.8 Rwards ad Rcg 18

    2.9 Prcvd Jb Scury ad eplyably 18

    2.10 Qu is ad Jb Swchg Bhavur 18

    2.11 iuc C-wrkr Prrac 19

    3 research design and methods 20

    3.1 Sapl characrscs 20

    4 findings 24

    4.1 Rags ky ply dcs 25

    4.1.1 G Y vs -G Y 25

    4.1.2 G Y 1s, 2d ad 3rd wavs 26

    4.2 iprac ky ply dcs 27

    4.2.1 G Y vs -G Y 27

    4.2.2 G Y 1s, 2d ad 3rd wavs 28

    4.3 ohr ucs ky ply dcs 29

    4.3.1 Drcs by dusry scr 294.3.2 Drcs by lgh ply (ur) 30

    4.3.3 Drcs bw suprvsry ad -suprvsry plys 31

    4.3.4 Drcs by ply saus 32

    4.4 t ky fdgs r h survy hspal y plys 33

    5 discussion of resuLts 34

    6 imPLications for the hosPitaLity industry 38

    6.1 t rcdas r aagg G Y 38

    1. G rgh, rgh r h sar 38

    2. G gagd! eply gag s ssal 39

    3. Buld a cpay culur ha s ururg ad cllabrav 40

    4. ecurag pprus r larg ad grwh hrughchallgg wrk 41

    5. D assu ha G Y has had h sa h rag

    as pas gras. 41

    6. G u dal! Us chlgy prv cuca

    wh yur sa 42

    7. Rvals yur ld rcg prgras 42

    8. B prpard b r bl ha yu hugh cssary 43

    9. d ways r h w lar r h ld (ad vc vrsa!) 43

    10. Rcgs ad rspc dvdualy 44

    6.2 t rcdas r aagg G Y: Suary 45

    7 finaL remarks 46

    BiBLiograPhy 48

    aPPendix a emPLoyee indices: survey items 50

    tabl Cs

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    8/56

    g 1: th G Y rsarch dl 12

    g 2: Ky ply dcs 15

    g 3: Rspds by dusry scr 20

    g 4: Rspds by graal grup 21

    g 5: Gdr rspds 21

    g 6: Hghs lvl duca cpld 21

    g 7: tur rspds 22

    g 8: Pss hld by rspds 22

    g 9: eply saus rspds 22

    g 10: Suary ky ply dcs 24

    g 11: Ky ply dcs: G Y vs. -G Y 25

    g 12: Ky ply dcs by G Y wav 26

    g 13: iprac ky dcs: G Y vs. -G Y 27

    g 14: iprac ky dcs by G Y wav 28

    g 15: Ky ply dcs by dusry scr 29

    g 16: Ky ply dcs by ur 30

    g 17: Ky ply dcs by ps 31

    g 18: Ky ply dcs by ply saus 32

    g 19: Cpars characrscs: G Y, G x ad Baby Brs 36

    Ls gurs

    6 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    9/56

    7An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    10/56

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    11/56

    9An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

    the work-related attitudes o Gen Y

    employees are regarded as radically dierent

    to those o previous generations entering theworkorce.

    udrsadg ply va,

    auds ad prrac.

    1.1 what is a Generation and

    how does it inLuence the

    workPLace?

    A gra s dfd as a

    dfabl grup ha shars brh

    yars, ag lca ad sgfca

    l vs a crcal dvlpal

    sags, dvdd by fv [] sv yars

    h frs wav, cr grup ad las

    wav1. A gra, h, s a chr

    ppl wh shar slar scal r

    hsrcal prcs, whch ac h

    way brs vw ad rpr h

    wrld. th shard prcs wll hav

    aninuenceonhowamemberofa

    gra ls wards auhry ad

    rgasas, wha hr wrk-rlad

    valus ar, ad hw a prs wuld ac

    sasy hr valus ad dsrs.

    Asmanagersasserttheirowninuence

    h rag uur ladrs, ach

    gra wll cu r-df

    h rgasaal vr

    ad hw busss pras ar

    cducd, crag plcas r argasas culur, hcs ad hua

    rsurcs plcs ad prcdurs.

    Rsarch cducd acrss dd

    prds has ud ha wrk valus

    aremoreinuencedbygenerational

    prcs ha by ag r aury2.

    thr s s dba bh h

    ppular da ad acadc lraur

    vr h prcs yar rags ach

    graal grup days wrkplac.

    thr wll aurally b s vrlap ad

    slars bw hs br arud

    h dgs ach graal rag.

    Hwvr, a l ds d b draw

    swhr r aalycal purpss.

    Accrdgly, ar csdrg h

    ajry vw, h graal cu-s

    ur sudy ar dfd as llws:

    Generation Y

    br bw 1979 ad 1994

    Generation x

    br bw 1965 ad 1978

    BaBY Boomers

    br bw 1945 ad 1964

    G Y currly ubrs 4.65 ll

    ppl Ausrala, r 21 prc

    h al Ausrala wrkrc3. r h

    hspaly dusry, hs prpr s

    v grar G Y aks up arly

    a hrd (30%) al plys4. ths

    fgurs wll grw draacally h

    dcad. By 2020, h prpr

    G Y plys h wrkrc wll

    dubl 42%, whl Baby Brs wll

    dcl r 36% h (al Ausrala)

    wrkrc jus 15%5. th pac h

    hspaly dusry wll lgcally b acu.

    i ay cs, h wrk-rlad

    characrscs ad auds G Y

    plys ar rgardd as radcally

    dr hs prvus gras

    rg h wrkrc. ths

    characrscs ad auds ar a dds

    wh cval hkg hw w

    ras h wrkplac shuld hk

    ad ac. As radcal as G Ys audsay r ay b, hs auds ar

    hlss udaal drg

    h srvc ra a hspaly

    rgasa ad shuld, hrr, b

    gv srus csdra. Drg

    hw bs alr prvalg ply

    srags ach h vaal,

    rag ad dvlp ds

    G Y plys appars b h

    ajr hua rsurc challg r h

    hspaly dusry h uur.

    i h llwg sc, w prvd a

    suary h basc characrscs G Y. our suary s draw prcpally

    r a rvw acadc ad rad

    publcas ad s grad wh h

    fdgs a rud prlary cus

    grups cducd by h rsarch a

    r hs prjc.

    1.2 what makes Generation Y

    tick?

    G Y chldr hav grw up

    relativeafuence,withglobaleconomic

    prspry ad lw uplyhrughu hr lvs. Alhugh y

    has vr b a ajr ccr, hy

    hav lvd a ucra wrld, a wrld

    wh rrrs ad ajr vral

    shocks,connected24/7totheevents

    h wrld hrugh advacs

    ra chlgy. mul-askg

    1 Kupperschmidt, B.R. (2000) . Multigeneration employees: strategies or eective management. The Health Care Manager, 19:65-76.2 Smola, K.W., & Sutton, C.D. (2002). Generational dierences: revisiting generational work values or the new millennium. Journal o

    Organizational Behaviour, 23( 4): 3 63-382.3 McCrindle Research. (2010). Snapshot: Australia approaching peak labour.

    4 Cairncross, G., & Buultjens, J. (2007). Generation Y and work in the tourism and hospitality industry: problem? what problem?.

    Centre or Enterprise Development and Research, Occasional Paper No. 9.5 See McCrindle (2010) as above.

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    12/56

    10 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    s a hab, whr 30 hurs c

    ca b crad a 7-hur prd6.

    ths s prcs cras a lwlrac r brd ad G Y ca

    b vry slcv h way hy

    rcv ra h r

    racv s, h r wll pull h

    wards .

    G Y s usd lg cludd ad

    havg hr p hard. ths s as

    a rsul havg r vlv

    aly dcss ha prvus

    gras ad lvg a h r lgr

    ar fshg schl. ths c ra

    has ld G Y sprg b lablld

    as KiPPeRS - Kds Pars Pck

    erdg Rr Savgs. i appars

    ha aly s r pra

    G Y ha prvus gras. ths

    uc s dsrad by h rsuls

    a sudy h US ha shw ha ly

    12 13 prc G Y ar wrk-

    crc (.. hs wh plac grar

    prac wrk ha aly) ad 50

    prc ar aly-crc, cpard

    wh 22 prc Baby Brs wh

    ar wrk-crc ad 41 prc bg

    aly-crc7.

    i a wrkg c, h G Y

    ply s dscrbd as r

    dadg ha w plys hav

    vr b br. thy ar arad

    prssg hr ps. Wh a lw

    lrac r brd, G Y hrvs

    w challgs ad pcs b

    shw rspc ad gv rspsbly

    r arly hr ply.

    ths w gra s rlychlgcally lra, sl-rla,

    dpd, ad lkg r sa

    rwards, whr lg-r as

    wlv hs. ths plys ar

    pcg ak a crbu

    shg wrhwhl, hav hr

    pu rcgsd r h sar ad

    ar wllg pu yars srvc

    rdr ga ay sgfca rward

    r hr plyr. i h wrkplac,

    hy sk csa dback, v

    a daly bass. o h whl, hy dslk

    al ad rpv wrk ad sk wchallgs rgularly.

    In the workplace,

    Gen Y seeks constant

    eedback, even on a

    daily basis.

    i gral, G Y rcrus pc

    jy hr jbs, ad ar parcularly

    ccrd wh arss h

    wrkplac barg d ha hr

    da arss ay b h sa as

    yurs! r sac, hy d hk

    s ar ha hy shuld hav wa yars

    b rwardd r hr pu, wh

    hy ar akg a valuabl crbu

    w. G Y plys ar cllabrav

    aur, phassg awrk ad

    pcg b daly rcgsd

    ad rspcd r hr pu. Alhugh

    rc cc crcusacs culd

    hav b pcd alr s

    hs auds, h gral cssus

    s ha hs c G Y ras sll

    hld ru.

    Multi-tasking isa habit, where 30

    hours o content can

    be crammed into a

    7-hour period.

    Gen Y is used to eeling included

    and having their opinion heard.

    6 Millwood, A. (2007) . The young and the restless. Nations Restaurant News, 41(5), 132-133.7 Families & Work Institute. (2002). Generation & gender in the workplace, Families & Work Institute,

    Retrieved rom

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    13/56

    11An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

    G Y pc b prasd r hr

    rs, rahr ha ly r hr rsuls

    - hs s lkly du bg rasd

    -cpv vrs ha

    plac prac parcpa vr

    fshg frs. th plcas hs

    r prrac aag wll b

    sgfca. G Y plys, havg

    pu a l r a ask, y havg

    achvd h dsrd uc, wll sll

    pc hr ap b rcgsd

    ad ackwldgd.

    ergg rsarch suggss ha

    hs gra s r ducad ad

    cfd ha prvus gras8

    ad hy ar h sars gra

    vr9. ths wuld suggs a asr

    ably lar, dvlp ad adap h

    wrkplac. Gv hs, s surprsg

    h ha G Y plys wuld dsr

    grar rspsbly ad vlv

    wrkplac dcss ad prcsss

    r arlr hr ply ur.

    G Y plys pc a wd

    rag agbl rwards, cludg

    pwr, rspc, rcg

    as a dvdual, a havy vs

    rag ad dvlp, vary

    daly wrk, rd wrk s

    w av, scp r cravy

    s wrk, wrkplac vlv,

    ccr r ply wlar ad

    supprv aag (hy d

    wantmuch,dothey?).Sociallyand

    vrally acv rgasas

    ar parcularly aracv h ypcal

    G Y ply. i has b bsrvd

    by s prs ha bg gr ca

    b a cv r sragy r h

    G Y chr.

    Gv chagg ply

    dgraphcs ad auds, supply-

    dad balacs h wrkrc,

    as wll as vr-grwg dad r

    hspaly bussss, s crasgly

    bvus ha a w udrsadg

    ply valus, auds, ad

    bhavurs s dd hspaly

    rgasas ar susa a

    cpv advaag hrugh srvc.

    t ha d, h llwg sc wll

    dscuss h ccpual rawrk ad

    udrpg lgc whch hs G Y

    rsarch prjc s basd.

    1.3 LinkinG emPLoYee

    attitudes to Business

    success

    ths rpr rducs, plas ad

    uss ay ccps ad prcpls

    spusd by h dscpl kw

    as organisational psychology.orgasaal psychlgy cuss

    h pac ha dvduals, grups ad

    srucurs hav bhavur h

    wrkplac. orgasaal psychlgy

    s h applca r s

    psychlgcal acs ad prcpls

    h prbls ccrg hua bgs

    prag wh h c busss

    ad dusry. mr sply, rgasaal

    psychlgy s h scfc sudy h

    rlashp bw ppl ad h

    wrld wrk.

    Gv h hr ppl-rlad ssus

    d h pg paragraphs,

    sudyg h rlashp bw

    ppl ad hr wrk s parcularly

    rlva ad apprpra h sudy

    hspaly aag. Wh w rr

    h psychlgy h wrkrc, w

    rr h auds hld by wrkrs,

    andtheinuencethatattitudeshave

    bhavur, parcularly rla

    bhavur wards c-wrkrs

    ad ward cusrs. i hs sudy,

    w ar spcally ccrd wh

    hw drcs auds acrssgras wll pac bhavur.

    thr ar ay bfs, s

    bvus, hrs lss, gag a br

    udrsadg ply auds.

    r apl, hr s grwg vdc

    ha hr ar drc ccs

    bw wrk vrs as

    prcvd by plys ad

    pra rgasaal ucs,

    such as cusr sasac, cusr

    lyaly ad prfably. th uda

    hs prs s ha rdr

    dlvr css lvls srvc,rgasas bf wh plys

    vw varus aspcs hr wrkg

    vr avurably (: hs s

    h sa as jb sasac, whch w

    rvw lar).

    A prcpal cus rgasaal

    psychlgy s hw prv

    busss ucs by way

    udrsadg h psychlgy r

    Gen Y employees

    are collaborativein nature,

    emphasising

    teamwork and

    expecting to be

    immediately

    recognised and

    respected or theirinput.

    Socially and environmentally active organisations areparticularly attractive to the typical Gen Y employee.

    8 Pew Research Center. (2010) Millenials: A portrait o Generation Next. Pew Research Center, Retrieved rom http://pewresearch.org/millennials/9 Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: how the Net Generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    14/56

    12 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    auds wrkrs. Gag such

    udrsadg ca b achvd va

    a srs asurs ha hav b

    dvlpd ad sd vr yars. r

    h purps hs rsarch prjc, w

    cpld a cprhsv ls h

    s rlva asurs r hspaly

    plyrs ad plys, parcular

    r G Y plys. W rr ach

    h asurs as a ply d,

    ad ach h ky ply dcs

    wll b rvwd grar dal h

    llwg sc.

    t ad udrsadg h rlashps

    bw s h ccps

    dscussd hr, gur 1 llusras h

    dl whch hs rsarch prjc s

    basd. ths dl was dvlpd by

    h rsarchrs h al sags

    hs rsarch prjc ad was rgallypublshd hJournal o Hospitality

    and Tourism Management10. essally,

    externalinuenceshaveaneffecton

    GenYsworkvalues,whichinuence

    G Ys wrk auds, ad ur,

    h bhavurs ha G Y hbs a

    wrk. Ulaly, h ucs ha h

    plyr achvs ar acd by G

    Ys wrk bhavurs.

    iracg wh G Ys wrk-rlad

    valus ad auds ar h hua

    rsurc aag (HRm) srags

    pld by h rgasa, whch

    areinuencedbyinternalcharacteristics

    h rgasa. th rgasaal

    characrscs ad HRm srags

    hav a ably arac pal G

    Y plys, hs ar alg

    wh G Ys wrk valus. th dyac

    rac bw G Ys wrk valus

    ad auds ad h HRm srags theorganisationwillinuenceGenYs

    wrk bhavurs wh a rsulg pac

    rgasaal ucs.

    W ackwldg ha dr yps

    hspaly bussss (fv sar hls

    vs.backpackers;nediningvs.fast

    food)havevaryingrequirementsinterms

    h lvls srvc hy prvd, h

    au rag dd, ad h lk.

    Bu c arly all hspaly

    bussss s a havy rlac sa

    hua bgs wh ar h ac

    h busss ad wh ca ak r

    brak ach cusr prc. o

    parcular rs us (ad hpully

    h radrs hs rpr) s h rvrs

    sd h ppl challgs c,

    ha ay h wrlds bs hspaly

    rgasas vw ppl challgs

    as a ppruy ga cpvadvaag11.

    iGure 1: the Gen Y research modeL

    10 Solnet, D. & Hood, A. ( 2008). Generation Y as hospitality employees: Framing a

    research agenda. Journal o Hospitality & Tourism Management 15(4): 59-68.11 For urther reading and examples o how hospitality organisations are successully

    turning human resource challenges into opportunities, please see Solnet et al. (2010)

    and Ford & Heaton (2001), as cited in the Bibliography.

    ExtErnal InluEncEs

    societal

    political

    technological

    historical

    GEn Y work valuEs

    respect

    recognition

    input & involvement

    continuous development

    supportive management

    fairness, tolerance, equity

    concern for individual

    welareGEn Y work atttItudEs

    job satisfaction

    motivation

    organisational

    commitment

    GEn Y work bEhavIours

    level of absenteeism

    standard of performance

    intention to stay/leave

    orGanIsatIonal

    outcomEs

    Protability

    Turnover

    Market share

    Customer retention

    Reputation as an

    employer

    Competitive advantage

    hrm stratEGIEs

    recruitment & selection

    induction

    training & development

    empowerment

    supervisor support

    intrinsic benets

    extrinsic benets

    communication

    performance management

    orGanIsatIonal

    InluEncEs

    vision

    mission

    values

    resources & costs

    expertise

    strength of culture

    service orientation

    ATTRACTEDB

    Y

    ALIGNED WITH

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    15/56

    In summary, people and eective

    people management are, and

    will always be, central to the

    ultimate success o the hospitality

    businesses. The entrance o Gen

    Y to the hospitality workorce has,

    however, prooundly altered the

    way employment will be viewed and

    managed in the uture. In order to

    fnd new ways o approaching the

    employment relationship, to the mutual

    beneft o employees and employers,

    it is necessary to study generational

    dierences in work attitudes through

    the lens o organisational psychology.

    Thereore, the main purpose o this

    report is to:

    provideinformationtoindustry

    about critical employee attitudes;

    undertakeathoroughexamination

    o dierences in employee

    attitudes that can be attributable

    to generational groups, with a

    particular ocus on Generation Y;

    discusstheimplicationsofthe

    fndings or hospitality operators.

    Having reviewed the background

    and rationale or this project, we will

    identiy the important aspects o

    the hospitality work environment, as

    perceived by employees that we can

    actively measure. In other words,

    we want to isolate the employee

    attitudes that have direct and positive

    links to employee behaviours, as

    demonstrated by scientifcally rigorous

    research.Forexample,weknow

    rom streams o research that highly

    engaged workers are more likely to

    exertgreatereffortonbehalfoftheir

    workplace. So, i we can measure

    levels o engagement and compare

    these across dierent generational

    groups, we can learn about how

    engagement levels vary by age.

    Photo courtesy of Mirvac

    Hotels and Resorts

    13An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    16/56

    14 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    2

    t p b

    ply

    pp ( ) g by b

    p ppl g

    p f. all

    l b

    b p

    gl , plly

    -b

    ply-

    g.

    i h radr hs rpr aks hg

    ls u hs rsarch, w blv

    wuld b hghly usul udrsad

    h ccps suarsd blw ad

    ak vry r prv ply

    prcp hs ccps hr

    wrkplac. A ws prs c sad

    ha rug a hspaly busss s

    lk akg a husad brushsrks

    ach day s pssbl g

    ach ad vry h all rgh

    all h . Hwvr, adg

    ach brush srk r hs cas

    h psychlgcal dcars w hav

    asurd wll craly lad br

    busss ucs ha lavg all

    chac.

    S r ay h ply d

    s lsd blw ay appar b

    h sa r slar. t a , hs

    s ru. Hwvr, yars rsarch ad

    sascal ss hav shw ha ach

    h dcs, alhugh swha

    vrlappg, s sascally dsc. i s

    hrr pra a ach

    dpdly.

    gur 2 prvds a suary ach

    h ky ply dcs. urhr

    dals abu ach ar rd

    h sub-scs blw. r rsd

    radrs, ra all h prvus

    schlarly wrk rrrd , hr

    drcly r drcly, s prvdd h

    Bblgraphy12

    . Radrs ca fd hls survy s ha rla ach

    ply d Appd A.

    2.1 joB satisaction

    Gag a sud grasp h ccp

    jb sasac s ar r cpl ha

    gh ally hk. idd, has

    b h subjc gg rsarch

    r s h las cury. thr s a

    gral bl ha jb sasac, ad

    psv lgs ward s jb, hav

    a psv pac wrk prrac.

    essally, jb sasac dscrbs

    hw c a dvdual s wh hs r

    hr jb, r, h h plasurabl

    r psv al sa, whch

    rsuls r h valua 's

    jb13.

    thr s a surprsg au

    cply vlvd udrsadg

    hs ccp ad s rlashp wh

    pra rgasaal ucs such

    as cusr sasac, sa urvr,

    ad rvu grwh. Rgardlss

    hs cpls, s val udrsad hs pra cava: ha

    sasac a jb shuld vr b

    cusd wh ply va

    r prrac. i s pssbl b

    vry sasfd wh s jb, bu sll

    unmotivatedtoperformtotherequired

    sadard. ths s bcaus hr

    aremanyknowninuencesonjob

    sasac, cludg c-wrkrs, pay

    ad bfs, cds, suprvs,

    aur h wrk, aag syl

    ad h lk.

    thr ar hr rlad ls hugh

    abu jb sasac ad ply

    prrac whch suggs ha jb

    Wha wasurd

    ad why

    12 Should any reader require further information relating to these indices or how they were incorporated

    into the research design, please contact the Generation Y Project Leader, Dr David Solnet, directly.13 Locke, E.A. (1976). The nature and causes o job satisaction. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook o

    Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297-349). Chicago: Rand McNally.

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    17/56

    15An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

    dssasac clarly has gav

    pacs r a rgasa, bu ha jb

    sasac, by sl, s ugh kp wrkrs vad ad prrg

    wll. Rgardlss ay dscrpacy

    rsarch abu jb sasac, w

    blv ha s srucv udrsad

    jb sasac, parcularly h

    c graal drcs.

    2.2 emPLoYee enGaGement

    eply gag s arguably

    theavourofthedayinservice

    rgasas, rs wha s s

    as a crcal asur succss. i s

    crasgly rcgsd as a pra

    acr psg rgasaal

    ucs. th basc s ha h

    r plys l hy ar abl

    prss hr prrrd slvs a wrk,

    h r hy wll vs hr wrk

    rl ad hr rgasa. i hs ss,

    ply gag cprss w

    ajr cps. th frs, lgs

    gag, dscrbs a lvad

    sa rgy ad husas

    wards h rgasa ad h

    wrk asks. th scd cp,

    gag bhavurs, ar hacs dsrad pursu

    achvg rgasaal gals, such as

    ask prssc, bg pracv, ad

    assug addal rspsbls as

    required14.

    i s pra phass h

    dsc bw h ccps jb

    sasac ad ply gag.

    Jb sasac s rlad wha a

    cpay s dg r s plys ad

    vlvs plys valuas such

    drvrs as jb scury, bfs ad

    pprus r advac. o h

    hr had, gag s ccrd

    wh h ull ulsa a plys

    EmPloYEE IndEx brIE dEscrIPtIon

    J ii The pleasurable emotional state that results rom theevaluation o one's job

    Eggee The ull utilisation o an employees skills and abilities;

    a positive link between individual and organisational

    objectives

    ogii iizeip ei Going above and beyond what is generally

    accepted to be a part o an employees ormal role

    requirements

    ogii ie A psychological attachment to the organisation;

    having a strong sense o belonging to the organisation

    Peeie gii pp An employees evaluation o the extent to which their

    employer values their contributions and cares abouttheir well-being

    Peeie pei pp An employees evaluation o the extent to which their

    direct supervisor values their contributions and cares

    about their well-being

    Peeie ie Perceptions o justice relating to how work is

    organised and how eort is acknowledged /rewarded

    tiig & eepe ppiie Perceptions regarding the investment an organisation

    has made in the employee in terms o T&D

    opportunities

    re The extrinsic or nancial benets received in

    exchange or work done

    regii The acknowledgement or credit given or a job well

    done or improvement in perormance

    Peeie j eiy Expectations o uture job continuity in an

    organisation

    Peeie epyiiy How a person views their employment prospects both

    within and outside an organisation

    Qi iei The intention to leave ones job

    J iig ei Changing jobs or changes sake, or un

    c-e pee The negative infuence o poor co-worker

    perormance

    14 May, D. R., R. L. Gilson, et al. (2004). The psychological conditions o meaningulness, saety and availability and

    the engagement o the human spirit at work, Journal o Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77(1): 11-37.

    iGure 2: keY emPLoYee indices

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    18/56

    16 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    sklls ad abls, ad dcas a psv

    lk bw dvdual ad rgasaal

    bjcvs. i hs lgh, a plyca b sasfd wh hs r hr jb,

    ha pays wll ugh, s sabl ad

    rs uur pprus, y sll b

    gagd hr wrk, as h ply

    ls udr-ulsd ad prsally

    salgd wh rgasaal gals ad

    valus.

    2.3 orGanisationaL citiZenshiP

    Behaviour

    eplys ha hb rgasaal

    czshp bhavurs ar hsplys ha bhav a way ha

    gs abv ad byd wha s

    grally accpd b a par

    theirformalrolerequirements.These

    czshp bhavurs rsul prvd

    rgasaal ucs, r apl,

    a br ss awrk rally, r

    crasd cusr sasac rsuls

    rally15.

    Such bhavurs ar als kw

    as ra-rl bhavurs, ad ar

    avurabl ay rgasa,

    parcularly hs ha ar rla hqualityofinterpersonalinteractions,

    such as hspaly bussss. thr

    ar a ubr dr yps

    czshp bhavurs, cludg:

    altruism(helpingotherpeopleinthe

    organisation);

    conscientiousness(goingwell

    byd h u rl

    requirementsintermsofattendance,

    obeyingrules);

    sportsmanship(toleratingless

    ha dal crcusacs whu

    complaining);

    courtesy(takingproactivemeasures

    topreventworkplaceproblems);

    andcivicvirtue(highlevelsof

    ccr abu h rgasa).

    2.4 orGanisationaL

    commitment

    ths ccp dscrbs h psychlgcal

    aach ha a ply ls (r

    ds l) a rgasa. thr

    ar a ubr ways whch s

    ca b psychlgcally aachd hr

    wrk rgasa. r h purpss

    hs prjc, h yp rgasaal

    c ha s s rlva s

    acv (r v) c.

    Acv c vlvs a grar

    ss lyaly ad shard valus

    bw ply ad plyr, as

    ppsd c, whch arss

    r a ss bl ga (rav

    c) r r a lack alrav

    ply ps (cuac

    c)16.

    Acv c a rgasa

    has b shw b a pra

    acr ply lyaly, ddcaad hr pra ply

    prrac asurs. Wh a

    prs s cd, hy dy

    srgly wh, ad hav a pwrul

    ss blgg , h rgasa.

    Cd plys g vlvd

    wrkplac avs ad acvs r

    radly ad dsra a wllgss

    d whavr s cssary pursu

    rgasaal gals. Prvus rsarch

    has shw drc asscas bw

    acv rgasaal c

    ad hr ky pra ply

    prrac dcars such as rducd

    abss, prvd jb prrac

    ad lwr ras sa urvr.

    15 Podsako, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H. & Fetter, R. (1990). Transormational leader behaviours and their eects

    on ollowers trust in leader, satisaction, and organizational citizenship behaviours. The Leadership Quarterly 1(2): 107-142.16 Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J. & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test o a three-

    component conceptualization. Journal o Applied Psychology 78( 4): 538-551.

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    19/56

    17An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

    2.5 Perceived suPervisorY

    and orGanisationaL

    suPPort

    tw rlad, y dsc ccps ha

    ar pra asur, parcularly

    wh lkg a graal drcs

    hspaly ply auds, arprcvd rgasaal suppr (PoS)

    ad prcvd suprvsry suppr

    (PSS). o h had, PoS dscrbs

    h valua ha a ply aks

    rgardg h whch hr

    plyr valus hr crbus ad

    cars abu hr wll-bg. o h

    hr had, hr s als clar vdc

    ha ply auds ar acd

    ly by h acs ad auds

    aagrs ad wrs (.. hs wh

    ar s as sr aagrs r abv),

    bu als by ay h rgasa

    wh s bswd pwr ad

    rspsbly, such as suprvsrs, sh

    ladrs ad capas. Accrdgly, PSS

    rrs h way plys prcv

    suppr r hr drc suprvsr17.

    Suprvsrs d play a v largr

    rl ha sr aag aras

    dvdual assss ad dback.

    Acg as ags r h rgasa,

    suprvsrs hav a prud c

    plys wrk-rlad prcs.

    i shuld b ls wrs ad

    aagrs ha plys d sa busss as a lvg y. S h

    acs ay gv pwr ar

    vwd slarly. ths cras a

    addal lvl cply wh a

    rgasa grws ad wh r

    ppl ar gv grar rspsbly.

    A rsg udrpg

    rgasaal ad suprvsry

    suppr s scal chag hry,

    whrby wrkrs d rad r

    ad ddca a wrkplac r

    agbl cvs such as pay, bu

    als r sc-al bfs,such as s, apprval ad carg.

    Assug ha srvc wrkrs bf

    r prcvd suppr r hr

    rgasa ad r hr suprvsr,

    s pra ad usul udrsad

    h dgr whch hs ccp s

    prcvd drly acrss graal

    grups. idd, hr s a srg

    argu suggs ha h wrk-

    rlad auds G Y plys

    ar r lkly b acd by

    hr prcps suprvsry ad

    rgasaal suppr18.

    2.6 Perceived airness

    th arss (als kw

    as jusc) has gad crasg

    prac rs udrsadg

    h way plys r r h

    workplace.Someofthequestionsa

    prs wll ask hslvs wh askdwh a duy r rspsbly ar, s ha

    fair?andamIbeingpaidappropriately

    r wha i d, cpars wha

    othersdo?.

    Lk ay hr ccps

    rgasaal psychlgy, asurg

    arss s cpl, ad varus ways

    hav b prpsd ad sd vr

    h yars. i gral, s agrd ha

    udrah h brad df

    arss s a ubr rrlad ways

    hkg abu arss ad jusc

    rgasas. Dr aspcs

    arss hav dr cs

    varus ply auds. th aspcs

    prcvd arss ha ar s

    rlva h curr sudy ad ar

    capurd by h hr ky ply

    dcs ar prcdural jusc (ar

    h wrk prcdurs ad rslu

    processesfair?)anddistributivejustice

    (ismyeffortproperlyacknowledged?) 19.

    Basd h backgrud rsarch

    G Y, ss lkly ha hr wrk-

    rlad auds wll b r acd

    by hr prcps arss wha rgasa. S s cssary

    cpar arss prcps acrss

    graal grups.

    2.7 traininG and deveLoPment

    oPPortunities

    Prvdg plys wh rag ad

    dvlp (t&D) pprus has

    lg b s as a ky l,

    ly buldg hua capal, bu als

    as a as prvg sa r

    ad va. ths s parcularly h

    cas h hspaly dusry, whr

    s pra buld vsbl carr

    pahs r plys. r G Y, hs

    pprus r larg ad sl-

    dvlp wuld s b all h

    r crcal h ra wrk-

    rlad auds. Accrdgly, hs d

    ply p was cludd h

    sudy rdr s drcs acrss

    gras prcps rgardg

    h vs a rgasa has

    ad h ply rs t&D

    pprus, ad hw hs prcp

    mightinuenceotherattitudes.

    17 Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Aective commitment to the organization: the

    contribution o perceived organizational support. Journal o Applied Psychology 86(5) : 825-836.18 See Solnet & Hood (2008) or the ull explanation o this argument.19 Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a

    measure. Journal o Applied Psychology 86(3) : 386-400.

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    20/56

    18 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    2.8 rewards and recoGnition

    eply prcps h rwards

    ad rcg hy rcv r h

    r hy r h wrkplac hav

    obviousinuencesontheformationof

    pra ply auds. i hs

    sudy, rwards ar csdrd bh rsc, r facal, bfs ha

    a ply rcvs r hr wrk.

    As d prvusly, valuas

    rgardg pay ad cds hav a

    directinuenceonjobsatisfaction.

    Rcg s csdrd b h

    ackwldg ad crd r

    suprvsrs, whhr prssd vrbally

    r hrugh a agbl award, r a jb

    wll d, r r a prv jb

    prrac.

    thr s a l argu h ppular

    da rgardg G Y plys ha

    hy ar as vad by facal

    rwards as h prvus gras.

    isad, rcg ad bg valud

    ad rspcd r hr pu ar sad

    b bggr vars. ths sudy

    cluds a aa prcps

    bh rwards ad rcg (as

    spara dcs) rdr assss

    drcs acrss gras, s

    agul drcs s ad ar

    rlva hr pra ply

    auds.

    2.9 Perceived joB securitY

    and emPLoYaBiLitY

    Jb scury ca b dfd as a

    psychlgcal sa whr wrkrs

    hav pcas (ragg r vry

    lw vry hgh) uur jb cuy

    wh a rgasa. Wha ss

    happ wh plys s ha hy

    r a subcscus psychlgcal

    crac, whch s basd sgfcaly

    rus ad uual gd wll. Alhughvry wrkplac s dr, ad

    ars rlad a lcal cy,

    dusry, uply lvls ad

    wag cp ca vary, hr s

    cpllg vdc ha prcvd

    jb scury s a pra dcar

    ply r ad va. i

    ac, alg wh jyg a jb, bg

    rad wll ad rcvg ar wags,

    jb scury usually alls h p

    grupg vars ply

    prrac. S ay blv ha

    hs s crrc, blvg rahr ha h

    r plys ar kp dg, r

    l hrad abu hr jb, h r

    r hy wuld lkly apply. Hwvr,

    as a rsul ay suds, hr s

    vdc ha jb scury s ar r

    psv ha gav h lg ru20.

    Rlad h prcvd

    jb scury s ha prcvd

    plyably. ths ccp s dfd as

    hw a prs vws hr plyprspcs wh hr w rgasa

    (.g. pr, sdways v),

    usd hr rgasa, bu wh

    hr curr dusry, r v hr

    urlad flds. Wh a ply

    ls parcularly plyabl, hs

    aurally has cs h prac

    ha jb scury plays hr wrk

    r ad prrac21.

    th w dcs prcvd jb

    scury ad prcvd plyably

    wr cludd as a drc rsul

    csdrg h ypcal prcs

    ha hspaly aagrs hav had

    wh hr G Y plys. G Y

    plys ar dscrbd as

    cfd abu hr jb prspcs

    ad sgly bld h pal

    r uply. Havg grw up

    prsprus cc s, G

    Y hav ly rcly prcd h

    da cc hardshp. ev w,

    ay yug plys Ausrala

    hav sll b advrsly acd

    by h glbal facal crss ha has

    crppld h wrld rc yars.A aa drcs acrss

    gras prcvd jb scury

    ad plyably ad pal

    cs hr auds s hrr

    warrad.

    2.10 Quit intentions and joB

    switchinG Behaviour

    Ahr rlad ccp s wh a

    ply has s lav hr

    jb (rahr ha wh h plyr

    hps hy lav!). ths ccp sknownasintentionstoquitandis

    udrsd b ahr pra

    dcar ply prrac22

    plys ha ar dg

    lav whdraw r h

    wrkplac ad d r as uch

    r as hy hrws culd r

    wuld. Bcaus h hgh cs (bh

    agbl ad agbl) urvr,

    ay rgasas ar rsd

    rducg h ubr plys

    wh lav h rgaza vluarly.

    irsgly, s hav suggsd ha

    asurg s s a r usul

    ha asurg acual urvr, as

    sometimes,highquitintentionsdonot

    20 Khatri, N., Fern, C. T. & Budhwar, P. (2001). Explaining employee turnover in an Asian context.

    Human Resource Management Journal 11(1): 54-74.21 Berntson, E., Sverke, M. & Marklund, S. (2006 ). Predicting perceived employability: Human capital

    or labour market opportunities? Economic and Industrial Democracy 27(2) : 223-244.22 Colarelli, S. M. (1984). Methods o communication and mediating processes in realistic job

    previews. Journal o Applied Psychology 69(4): 633-642.

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    21/56

    equatetoactualturnoverduetohigh

    unemploymentorothereconomic/

    ral acrs.

    th a drc df

    betweenintentionstoquitandjob

    swchg rlas h raal r

    such s. Jb swchg sudrsd as a aud r bhavur

    whr plys gra r jb

    ahr rrspcv h way

    whch hy vw hr curr rl23. ths

    ccp s hghly prval wh h

    labur ark avurs plys, ad

    has v crad a aud ags

    wrkrs ha swchg jbs s sply

    u. G ar h days wh havg s

    jbs w yars s s uavurably

    onaresum!Consequently,itis

    pcd ha G Y plys wll

    scr hghr h jb swchg d

    ha hr G x r Baby Br

    curpars.

    2.11 inLuence o co-worker

    Perormance

    A fal ply d cludd

    hs sudy s rlad h sl-

    reportedinuenceofpoorco-worker

    prrac a plys w

    bhavur. tha s say, a ply

    ay pu lss r ha s accpabl,

    r prr sadard, bcaus

    a c-wrkr s als slackg . thss a ypcal asur ply

    auds ha s wll accpd h

    rgasaal psychlgy lraur.

    Rahr, s a addd by h

    rsarch a llwg h prlary

    cus grups ad survy pl sg

    cducd prr h a daa

    cllc prcss. A ubr

    parcpas h cus grups ad

    pl sg phass suggsd ha

    G Y plys sd b r

    acd by hr prs wh ca

    rg r h wrkplac.

    ths da sd vald, parcularly

    csdrg h rccvy,

    scal wrkg ad cllabrav

    wrkg syls ha appar df hs

    gra.

    23 Khatri, N., Fern, C. T. & Budhwar, P. (2001). Explaining

    employee turnover in an Asian context. Human Resource

    Management Journal 11(1): 54-74. 19An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    22/56

    20 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    3

    Pp y g

    y g g

    ply g bb gl

    Ql.

    th wrs ad Gral maagrs (Gm)

    hspaly frs h hl, rsaura

    ad club scrs wr cacd

    requestaccesstotheiremployeesin

    rdr cllc daa r hs rsarch. i

    gral, Gms wr husasc abu

    h prjc ad ay agrd hav

    hr prprs parcpa. i all, wy

    Quslad hspaly bussss

    parcpad h sudy24.

    th prary daa cllc l r

    hs sudy was a papr-basd survy.

    Rspds wr frs askd rpr

    s dscrpv characrscs,

    such as ag, gdr, ur wh curr

    rgasa, ps rgasa ad

    ply saus. i h a sc

    h survy, rspds dcad

    hr auds ( a scal 1 srgly

    dsagr 7 srgly agr)25

    wards a srs sas dsgd

    capur h ky ply dcs

    rducd h prvus sc hs

    rpr. th survy slcd ra

    r rspds hw hy prcvd

    hr curr wrk sua, as wll as hw

    hy prcvd hr dal wrk sua.

    th rsarch prjc as wr

    plad, parcpa slcd ad

    questionnairesdistributedtoindividualplys durg pr-arragd

    gahrgs sa (.g. dparal

    gs, rag ssss ad Gm

    brfgs). A h d h daa

    cllc prd a ach prpry

    (cpld July 2010), a al

    914usablequestionnaireshadbeen

    cpld. r h purps h yps

    sascal ss w ar s rsd

    , hs ubr, ad h brakdws by

    graal grup, rprs a vald

    sapl.

    3.1 samPLe characteristics

    gur 3 prss h brakdw

    rspds by dusry scr h

    ajry ar r hls, wh a hrd

    r rsauras ad h radr r

    h club scr.

    Rsarchdsg ad

    hds

    24 Our commitment to the participating organisations was that none of the data would be identiable to any

    particular organisation, and that we would not publish the names o participating organisations.25 This scale is known as a Likert Scale which has been ound, over decades o research and testing, to be a

    highly eective way o measuring and capturing the dierences in, and range o, employee attitudes.

    iGure 3: resPondents BY

    industrY sector

    Hl Club Rsaura

    32% 55%

    13%

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    23/56

    21An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

    gur 4 shws h graal

    grupgs h survy rspds. A

    ajry h rspds wr rh G Y ag brack (.. currly

    agd bw 17 ad 31 yars

    age),whichreectsthetraditional

    dusry rlac yugr wrkrs.

    th rag 344 rspds wr

    classfd as -G Y, whch 140

    ca b spcfcally dfd as G x

    (.. agd bw 32 ad 45 a h

    h sudy) ad 91 ca b dfd as

    Baby Brs (.. agd bw 46

    ad 65 a h h sudy)26.

    As dcad gur 5 h sapl s

    sly al, whch s als dcav h ypcal hspaly labur rc.

    urhr characrscs h sapl ar

    prsd h llwg fgurs. ths

    characrscs wr als capurd by

    thequestionnaireastheywerethought

    pssbly hav a pac ply

    auds ad valus, vr ad abv h

    pac h graal chr.

    As ca b s gur 6, r ha

    50% h sapl has ly cpld

    s lvl scdary duca. ths

    fdg s surprsg hwvr, gvh larg rprsa yugr

    rspds h sapl, ay

    wh wuld b cug hr

    schlg whls wrkg.

    iGure 5: Gender oresPondents

    mal al

    41%

    59%

    26 The initial round of completed questionnaires did not distinguish between Gen X and Baby Boomers

    and thereore the sample includes some participants who can only be distinguished as not Gen Y.

    34%30%

    15%

    6%12% 3%

    iGure 6: hiGhest LeveL o education comPLeted

    G Y G x

    Baby Brs n-G Y

    12%

    10%

    15% 63%

    iGure 4: resPondents BYGenerationaL GrouP

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    24/56

    th ur h sapl s rlavly

    rally dsrbud (gur 7), wh jus

    udr a hrd bg h frs yar ply, arly hal h sapl

    havg wrkd r hr rgasa

    bw ad fv yars ad arud

    wy prc havg wrkd wh hr

    rgasa r r ha 5 yars.

    th sapl cas a larg prpr

    d ad Bvrag plys

    (63 prc), wh Huskpg ad

    FrontOfce/Conciergerepresenting

    appraly 22 prc h sapl.

    th ajry rspds hld -

    suprvsry pss (s gur 8).

    i s rsg , hwvr, ha

    rs ply saus (

    gur 9), ull- plys ar s

    rprsd hs sapl, abv

    casual ad par- plys.

    Alhugh hr s a radal rlac

    ras ad -pra

    wrkrs h hspaly dusry, h

    characteristicsofthissamplereectthe

    parcpag rgasas phass

    prvdg ull-, rlabl ad

    prgrssv pss rdr prv

    va ad cba ply

    urvr.

    22 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    iGure 8: Positions heLd

    BY resPondents

    Non-supervisorySupervisor/Manager

    32%

    68%

    iGure 9: emPLoYment status

    o resPondents

    Casual Par- ull-

    21%

    36%

    43%

    iGure 7: tenure o resPondents

    47%

    22%31%

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    25/56

    23An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    26/56

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    27/56

    25An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

    th rsuls ar prsd h

    llwg rdr27:

    1. a p

    (y ply ):

    ofGenYagainstthecombined

    hrs (-G Y)28(4.1.1);

    withintheGenYgroup(1st

    wav, 2d wav, 3rd wav)

    (4.1.2).

    2. a p y

    :

    GenYvs.nonGenY(4.2.1);

    thethreeGenYwaves(4.2.2).

    3. a p l by:

    industrysector(club,hotel,

    restaurant)(4.3.1); tenure(lengthoftimean

    ply has b wrkg

    forthesamecompany)(4.3.2);

    position(supervisorvs.non

    supervisor)(4.3.3);

    employmentstatus(fulltime,

    par , casual) (4.3.4).

    4.1 ratinGs o keY emPLoYee

    indices

    4.1.1 G Y n-G Y

    ths sc prss h rsuls cral

    h udrlyg as hs sudy: Hw

    G Y s, r ay b dr, rs

    wrkplac auds (rbrg

    ha wrkplac auds hav a srg

    inuenceonworkplacebehaviours,

    parcularly wards cusrs ad c-

    wrkrs). gur 11 shws h d rc

    a auds r ach h ky

    ply dcs r bh grups, ad

    h ky fdgs ar hghlghd blw.

    iGure 11: keY emPLoYee indices: Gen Y vs. non-Gen Y

    Gen Y rates Lowerthan non-Gen Y on

    these attitudes

    Engagement

    Job Satisfaction

    Organisational CitizenshipBehaviours

    Organisational Commitment

    Perceived Supervisor Support

    Perceived OrganisationalSupport

    Perceived Fairness

    Perceived Job Security

    Rewards

    Gen Y rateshiGher than non-

    Gen Y on theseattitudes

    Perceived Employability

    Quit Intentions

    Job Switching Behaviours

    Inuence Of Co-WorkerPerformance

    27 Statistical analyses were perormed using the sotware package SPSS a wealth o supporting statistical inormation has

    been generated that will not be reported here. Statistical tests included independent samples t-tests, one-way analysis o

    variance, and factorial design analysis of variance. Please contact the researchers should you require more in-depth information.28 As the focus of this report is on Gen Ys work-related attitudes, the Baby Boomer and Gen X groups have been combined into

    one group named non-Gen Y. This aids the presentation of results and ndings as it focuses attention on Gen Ys attitudes.

    n-G Y G Y

    sgy digee sgy agee

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    28/56

    26 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    4.1.2 G Y 1, 2 3 w

    t vsga whhr h auds rky ply dcs ar slar acrss

    h gra, w brk hs gra

    dw sgs whch w calld

    wavs:

    1. 1s wav (h lds, agd bw

    27and31atthetimeofthesurvey);

    2. 2d wav (h d grup, agd

    bw 22 ad 26 a h h

    survey);

    3. 3rd wav (h yugs grup ad

    sll rlavly w h wrkrc,

    agd bw 17 ad 21 a h h survy)

    gur 12 shws h drc

    auds (as) r ach h hr

    wavs G Y.

    i gral, w ud ha h ldr h

    wav, h br h rag. S h 1s

    wav (lds) grally has h hghs

    rags, llwd by h 2d ad h

    3rd. th rvrs s als ru h 3rd

    iGure 12: keY emPLoYee indices BY Gen Y wave

    the younger

    the employee, themore difcult it is to

    generate attitudes

    linked with positive

    organisational

    outcomes, and the

    more likely they are

    to quit unexpectedlyor perorm poorly.

    1s Wav 2d Wav 3rd Wav

    Photo courtesy of Mirvac

    Hotels and Resorts

    sgy digee sgy agee

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    29/56

    27An exAminAtion o work attitude differences

    (yugs) wav has a hghr rag

    r h auds whr s dsrabl

    hav lw scrs, whl h 1s wav

    grally ras h lws u h

    hr wavs.

    ths suggss ha h yugr h

    ply, h r dfcul s gra auds lkd wh psv

    rgasaal ucs, ad h r

    lkly hy ar qu upcdly r

    prr prly. ths fdg was frs

    rvald h aalyss G Y vrsus

    -G Y, ad urhr supprd h

    aalyss h hr G Y wavs.

    4.2 iMPortance of keY

    eMPLoYee indices

    th aalyss s ar has csdrd

    h auds hspaly plys Quslad wh hy csdr

    hr curr wrk rgasa. W

    als askd rspds prvd

    a rag prac ach h

    dcs rdr br udrsad

    hw ach grup valus ach d

    h wrkplac. th prac (valu)

    ha plys aach ach d s

    aalysd rs G Y ad -

    G Y, as wll as h hr wavs

    G Y.

    4.2.1 G Y n-G Y

    gur 13 llusras h prac

    ach ply d G Y ad -

    G Y rspds.

    All plys, rgardlss gra,

    csdr s pra bsasfd wh hr jbs. llwg hs,

    Jb Scury ad Rwards ar rad

    as s pra by all rspds.

    n-G Y rspds ra s

    dcs as r pra ha G

    Y rspds, alhugh G Y

    plys plac a grar valu

    rcg ha -G Y plys.

    th bggs drc bw h

    rags G Y ad -G Y

    rspds was r h orgasaal

    C d G Y plys

    ra h prac hs d uch

    lwr ha -G Y rspds.

    Gen Y employees

    place a greater

    value on recognition

    than non-Gen Y

    employees.

    fiGure 13: iMPortance of keY indices: Gen Y vs. non-Gen Y

    n-G Y G Y

    Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

    All employees,

    regardless o

    generation,consider it most

    important to be

    satisfed with

    their jobs.

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    30/56

    28 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    4.2.2 G Y 1, 2 3 w

    gur 14 shws h drcs

    bw rags prac r

    ach ply d acrss h

    hr wavs G Y plys.

    Aga, Jb Sasac, Jb Scury

    ad Rwards ar rad as h s

    pra by hs rspds. Aga,

    h yugr plys csdr all

    h dcs b lss pra ha

    h ldr plys. r apl,

    ha h ldr plys s

    valu c h rgasa,

    rcg, suprvsry suppr

    (ad hrs) hghr ha h yugr

    plys. i s pssbl h, ha G

    Ys auds wll prv wh . igh b ha G Y sruggls l

    crabl h wrkplac ally,

    bu as hy ga prc, hy

    als prcv hgs r avurably.

    Whhr hs s as a rsul havg

    moreinuenceontheirworkplaceor

    bcaus hr valus hav chagd vr

    , ca b drd r hs

    rsarch dsg. Rgardlss, a

    ds b pad prvg h

    prcps h yugs ad ws

    wrkrs daly, ad wa r

    h wrk u r hslvs.

    iGure 14: imPortance o keY indices BY Gen Y wave

    1s Wav 2d Wav 3rd Wav

    sgy digee sgy agee

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    31/56

    29An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

    4.3 other inLuences on

    keY emPLoYee indices

    thr ar a hs rlva acrs

    thatcouldinuenceanemployees

    wrk-rlad auds ad valus, vr

    ad abv h c graal

    grupg. i s pssbl crl

    r all such varabls h sudy,

    s a w ky acrs wr slcd as

    potentiallysignicantinuencesonthe

    sapl grups auds.

    Gv ha h survyd plys,

    r h s par, hav dcad

    hr auds wards hr curr

    wrk sua, s pssbl ha

    industrysectorhasaninuenceonthe

    rspss. Dr wrk cds

    prval ach dusry scr, ad s

    lgcal assu ha hs gh hav a

    inuenceonattitudes.

    Lgh sp wh h rgasa

    (ur), ps wh h rgasa

    ad ply saus culd als

    inuencethewayemployeesperceive

    hr wrkg vr. each hs

    acrs wll w b csdrd rs

    ach h ky ply dcs.

    4.3.1 d by iy s

    gur 15 shws h drcs bw

    h rags ach ky ply

    d acrss ach dusry scr:

    hls, rsauras ad clubs acrss all

    graal grupgs. ipra fdgs

    ar hghlghd h sdbar rgh.

    W h ad h cbd

    inuenceofindustrysectorand

    graal grupg ply

    auds. i hs aalyss, w cpard

    h auds G Y plys acrss

    dr dusry scrs, dr

    hr ay subsaal drcs

    sd. i h club scr, w ud ha

    h prcps orgasaal ad

    Suprvsry suppr ar ly lwrr G Y plys ha -G Y

    plys, w als ud ha hy ar

    sgfcaly lwr ha h prcps

    G Y plys hr dusry

    scrs. ths dcas w aras r club

    aagrs cus rdr prv

    hr aag G Y plys.

    r G Y plys hls, w ud

    ha h orgasaal C ad

    orgasaal Czshp Bhavurs

    dcs ar sgfcaly srgr ha G

    Y plys h club ad rsaura

    scrs. thr ay b apls bs

    pracc srags plac hls ha

    rsaura ad club aagrs culd

    adap su hr w pras.

    restaurant emPLoYees

    rate Lower on:

    orgasaal CRwards

    hoteL emPLoYees

    rate hiGher on:

    orgasaal C

    Jb Scury

    Suprvsr Suppr

    orgasaal Suppr

    eplyably

    Rwards

    cLuB emPLoYees

    rate Lower on:

    Jb Scury

    Suprvsr Suppr

    Rsaura Club Hl

    iGure 15: keY emPLoYee indices BY industrY sector

    sgy digee sgy agee

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    32/56

    30 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    Lg md early

    4.3.2 d by Lg

    eply (t)

    gur 16 prss h drcs

    as h ky ply dcs

    acrss hr ur grupgs: arly

    ur (lss ha 1 yar) d-ur (1

    5 yars) ad lg ur (5+ yars).

    majr drcs ar hghlghd h

    sdbar l.

    Wh akg accu h cbd

    inuenceoftenureandgenerational

    grupg, w ud abl cs

    h dcs Jb Scury ad Jb

    Swchg Bhavurs. n surprsgly,

    fdg was ha G Y plys

    wll hav grar lgs jb scury

    a lar sags ur. o h hr

    had, G Y plys arlr sags

    ur, wll b r lkly swch

    jbs upcdly (ha plys wh

    ar G Y bu arly ur, r -

    G Y plys wh ar arly ur).

    earLY-tenure emPLoYees

    rate Lower on:

    egagJb Scury

    rate hiGher on:

    C-wrkr Prrac

    Jb Swchg Bhavurs

    Qu is

    mid-tenure emPLoYees

    rate Lower on:

    Jb Sasac

    Rwards

    arss

    LonG-tenure emPLoYees

    rate hiGher on:

    egag

    orgasaal C

    Czshp Bhavurs

    Jb Scury

    rate Lower on:

    C-wrkr Prrac

    Jb Swchg Bhavurs

    Qu is

    Gen Y

    employees, inearlier stages

    o tenure, will

    be more likely

    to switch jobs

    unexpectedly.

    iGure 16: keY emPLoYee indices BY tenure

    sgy digee sgy agee

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    33/56

    31An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

    Supervisor/ManagerNon-supervisory

    non-suPervisorY

    emPLoYees

    rate Lower on:egag

    orgasaal C

    Czshp Bhavurs

    trag & Dvlp

    opprus

    Prcvd Suprvsry Suppr

    Prcvd orgasaal Suppr

    Jb Scury

    suPervisors/manaGers

    rate Lower on:C-wrkr Prrac

    Jb Swchg Bhavurs

    Qu is

    4.3.3 d b

    spy n-

    spy eply

    gur 17 shws h drcs

    as ach h ky ply

    dcs r -suprvsry plys

    andforsupervisors/managers.A

    ubr pra drcs

    appard, whch ar hghlghd h

    sdbar rgh.

    Aga, w ad h cbd

    inuenceofpositionandgenerational

    grupg ply auds. W

    ud ha h dcs egag,

    Prcvd orgasaal Suppr ad

    Prcvd Jb Scury wr s

    inuencedbypositionandgenerational

    grupg, wh hs w acrs wr

    csdrd ghr. G Y plys

    ar lss gagd grally. Wh hy

    ar suprvsry pss, hs

    prbl s cpudd. th sa

    hlds r bh orgasaal Suppr

    ad Jb Scury.

    Gen Y employees

    are less engagedgenerally, and

    when they are in

    non-supervisory

    positions, this

    problem is

    compounded

    iGure 17: keY emPLoYee indices BY Position

    sgy digee sgy agee

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    34/56

    32 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    ull- Par- Casual

    casuaL emPLoYees

    rate hiGher on:

    C-wrkr Prrac

    Jb Swchg Bhavurs

    Qu is

    Part-time and uLL-time

    emPLoYees

    rate hiGher on:

    egag

    Czshp Bhavurs

    Jb Scury

    orgasaal Suppr

    Suprvsry Suppr

    4.3.4 d by eply

    s

    gur 18 prss h drcs

    as ach h ky ply

    dcs r ach yp ply

    saus: casual, par- ad ull-.

    ipra drcs bw h

    grups ar hghlghd h sdbar

    h l.

    Whl casual plys ar sgfcaly

    lss gagd ha par- r ull-

    plys, hr rag jb

    sasac s hghr ha bh h

    hr grups. ths fdg lds wgh

    h argu ad arlr ha a

    employeecanbequitesatisedwith

    hr jb, bu pssss h dsrd

    levelsofengagementknowntoinuence

    ply bhavurs.

    W als ad h cbd

    inuenceofemploymentstatusand

    graal grupg. th dcs

    trag & Dvlp opprus,

    Jb Scury, Rwards, C-wrkr

    Prrac ad Czshp Bhavurs

    wr s acd by ply

    saus ad graal grupg, wh

    hs w acrs wr csdrd

    ghr. i shr, hs auds ar

    prvd G Y plys wh

    hy ar par- pss, ad v

    r s ull- pss.

    Havg prsd h rsuls h daa

    cllc, w wll w hghlgh wha w

    s as h t ms ipra dgs

    r h survy hspaly plys.

    iGure 18: keY emPLoYee indices BY emPLoYment status

    sgy digee sgy agee

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    35/56

    4.4 ten keY indinGs rom the surveY o hosPitaLitY emPLoYees

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10G Y ply -py l gly Less

    enGaGed py Gen Y ply.

    Lg- ply ll l more

    avouraBLY l ply.

    hl ply glly l more avouraBLY

    lb ply.

    G Y ply, plly ly ply , more LikeLY

    b ply.

    G Y ply pl Lower l bg plly

    g.

    G Y ply pl g l recoGnition

    -G Y ply.

    aLL ply pl g l joB satisaction,

    ll by rewards joB securitY.

    w G Y gp, yg Less avouraBLe

    g l .

    o ll l b, G Y

    hiGher.

    o g b, G Y glly

    Lower.

    33An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    36/56

    34 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    5

    hply ply l

    b

    g , y

    ply ll

    p b

    l. a ,

    ply ll

    y y l by

    g. i y, l

    g

    p b bl

    .

    i s val h, ha hspaly

    bussss, rgardlss sz r

    dusry scr, sablsh cv

    hua rsurc aag

    srags ha acla h dlvry

    ofhighlevelsofservicequality.The

    ply dcs cludd hs sudy

    ar asurs varus aspcs h

    ral ucg a rgasa

    aspcs ha hav b lkd

    pra busss ucs such as

    crasd prfs, cusr r,

    psv wrd--uh ad lwr sa

    urvr.

    th s abl brad fdg rhs sudy was ha h G Y ply

    grup grally ras hs ply

    dcs ha a rgasa shuld

    b apg as as lwr

    ha hr -G Y curpars.

    Crrspdgly, h auds ad

    bhavurs ha a rgasa wuld

    wa s arstronger h G

    Y grup plys.

    i add hs, a aalyss wh h

    G Y ply grup dsras

    ha hr ar sascally sgfca

    drcs p wh hs

    chr. Grally spakg, h

    yugs G Y plys (h 3rd

    wav) ra wha s happg h

    hr rgasa sgfcaly lwr

    ha hr ldr G Y curpars.ths suggss ha h yugr h

    ply, h r challgg s

    psvly ac h crcal auds ha

    ar lkd wh psv rgasaal

    ucs.

    ths fdgs hghlgh h prac

    akg a gd frs prss

    w plys, parcularly wh hy

    ar hr frs jb. ths da s urhr

    supprd by cparg h rsuls

    plys dr ply

    ur. o h whl, h plys

    arly ur ra hr curr

    wrkplac prcs sgfcaly lss

    avurably ha d hr lg-urd

    curpars.

    These fndings

    highlight the

    importance o

    making a good

    frst impression onnew employees,

    particularly when

    they are in their

    frst job.

    th -bardg w plys

    ad succssul scalsa hr

    w rgasa ad wrkplac, s a

    crrs lg-r r

    sa. th ra prcss s crucal

    r all plys, rgardlss hr

    Dscuss rsuls

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    37/56

    35An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

    graal grupg. th fdgs

    hs sudy shw ha wh w

    plys ar als yug G Y sa,hs prcss s all h r challgg

    g rgh.

    tha s say ha plys

    hr d- ad lg-ur shuld

    b rg! ths sudy ud ha

    d-ur plys had h lws

    lvls jb sasac h hr

    ur grupgs, as wll as h lws

    prcps rwards ad arss.

    ogg ply dvlp ad

    suppr srags ar pra s

    ha lgr-r sa ar ak r

    grad r rg. Apg

    as h ur plys s

    a bvusly sud bjcv r ay

    busss. Hwvr, whl h bf

    lwr urvr s usually prssd

    rs rducd css h shr-

    r, wha bcs appar r

    hs sudy s ha crasg h lgh

    ply ur has advaags

    rs prvd ply auds,

    ad hrr, psv busss

    prrac h lg-r.

    ths sudy als ud ha all hdcs, Jb Sasac s s

    pra plys, rgardlss

    graal grupg r hr varabls.

    llwg hs, was grally ud

    ha Jb Scury ad Rwards ar h

    pra acrs r plys.

    All plys, rgardlss hr

    gra, plac a hgh valu

    bg sasfd wh hr jb, lg

    scur ad bg wll rwardd r

    dg .

    o curs s pssbl kw

    whhr h Jb Scury fdg s

    partinuencedbytheGlobalFinancial

    Crss (GC). Br h GC, G Y

    had vr prcd s facal

    hardshp, ad hs had b suggsd

    by ay as h rass r

    h radcal drcs hr wrk-

    rlad auds. i a cus grup ru

    by h rsarchrs a h bgg

    hs rsarch prjc (jus prr

    h 2008 sck-ark crash), a 18

    yar ld apprc ch, wh acd

    withthequestionwhatwillyoudoifyoucantndajob?,simplycouldnot

    cprhd wha sh was bg askd.

    th rsuls h curr sudy suggs

    ha G Y plac a hghr valu

    bg scur hr jbs ha has b

    suggsd acdally.

    turg h prac rwards,

    s als rsg ha plys

    ra hs h p hr s pra

    dcs. i cras, wh ag

    wha h plys acually prcv

    as happg hr curr wrkplac,

    h Rwards d has h lws ragu all h crcal ply asurs.

    thr s bvusly a gap bw wha

    plys wa ad wha hy ar

    rcvg.

    ths sudy als ud ha G Y

    plys plac a hghr valu

    bg rcgsd r hr wrk ha d

    -G Y plys. Rcg was

    h ly d ha G Y rspds

    rad as r pra ha -G

    Y rspds. o h c

    dscrps G Y h ppular

    da s ha hy d csa

    rcg hr crbu h

    wrk, v r asks ha ay s

    uda ad rval. th fdgs

    hs sudy ay ld s wgh hs

    argu.

    By grag h fdgs r ach

    phas h G Y rsarch prjc

    (lraur rvw, cus grups ad

    survy), w ar abl cpar

    h aur wrkplacs ha Baby

    Brs, G x, ad G Y pcd

    as ach rd h wrkrc. th ky

    l vs, da characrscs ad

    prrrd aag syls r ach

    gra ar suarsd gur 19.

    ths suary s dd as a gud

    r hw cc ach gra,

    bu rahr, prvd a udrsadg

    ad pahy r h prcs ad

    pcas ha dr ag grups

    ay brg h wrkplac. As scy

    has vlvd, s hav wrkplacs

    ad h pca h wrkrs

    h. Yu wll prbably fd ha s

    h G Y apprachs dcad ursummarywillbeequallyaseffectivefor

    Baby Br ad G x plys.

    t wrap up h dscuss h

    sudy rsuls, shuld b d ha

    all plys ar dvduals wh

    hr w prsals. n w ar

    vr gg b alk. Whl ca b

    usul dscvr rds auds

    ad ps acrss grups ppl,

    such as graal chrs, hr ar

    manyotherfactorsthatcaninuence

    wrk-rlad auds ad valus. As

    has b dsrad hr, ur,

    ps ad ply saus

    inuenceattitudes,beforeweeven

    There is obviously a gap between what

    employees want and what they are receiving.

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    38/56

    36 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    bg csdr a rag hr

    inuencessuchasculturalbackground,

    aly sz, ad prsaly ras.

    Theconsequenceofthisforhospitality

    bussss s ha, r pal busss

    ucs, all plys us b

    csdrd as dvduals. thr s

    blak apprach aagg all

    hua rsurcs. A paralll h

    dvlp arkg ca b

    draw hr. th v away r ass

    prduc ass cussa s

    ha s dd r h aag

    hua rsurcs.

    ths s gg a fgurg u whavas ach ad vry ply,

    G Y r . i s a ar wha

    vas yu wll va h, r

    v wha yu hk wll va h.

    Suprvsrs wll cssarly bc

    r ad r gral h hua

    rsurc aag prcss, as

    therstandmostfrequentpointof

    ply cac. Accrdgly, hy

    wll d h apprpra sklls ad

    kwldg cvly aag h

    ply rlashp.

    ths dscuss has shd s lgh hw h ky fdgs r hs survy

    gh pac h aag

    hua rsurcs hspaly

    bussss. Bu wha ca aagrs

    andownersdoaboutallofthis?The

    sc wll prs s praccal

    suggss ha ca prv h

    ply rlashp bw

    hspaly bussss ad hr G Y

    plys.

    iGure 19: comParison o characteristics: Gen Y, Gen x and BaBY Boomers 30

    boomErs

    b 1945 - 1964

    GEnEratIon x

    b 1965 - 1978

    GEnEratIon Y

    b 1979 - 1994

    ie ie

    ee

    Post-war prosperity

    Largest generation

    Globalisation

    Downsizing

    Technology boom

    Prosperity / uncertainty

    Violence / terrorism

    Skills shortages

    ve Work ethic

    Loyalty

    Hierarchy

    Achievement

    Independence

    Equity

    Ownership / involvement

    Individuality

    Social responsibility

    mii

    Financial security

    Responsibility

    Career progression

    Opportunity

    Job variety

    Creativity

    Ip

    qiie

    Social skills Technology skills

    Education

    IQ / inquisitive

    Networking / tolerance

    Multitasking

    Piy ig i Technology skil ls Socia l / networking skil ls Interpersonal / sot skills

    Direction / ocus

    Ifee e

    ee ie

    Parents

    Authorities

    Career advisors

    Experts

    Parents

    Internet

    Peers / social networks

    spe ee

    peepi

    ie

    Tradition

    Reputation

    Observation

    Recommendation

    Perception

    Experience

    key gee

    Recruiting

    Supervising

    Training

    Promoting

    Innovating

    Empowering

    key

    ii

    Technical data

    Evidence

    Visual examples

    Demonstrations

    Hands-on learning

    Participation

    typi iig

    ye

    Formal

    Monologue

    Programmed

    Dialogue

    Interactive

    Multi-ormat

    typi eeip

    ye

    Control

    Thinkers

    Coordination

    Doers

    Consensus

    Feelers

    Ifee

    e

    Local

    Long-term needs

    Regional

    Medium-term goals

    Global

    Short-term wants

    mgee

    pp

    Telling

    Yes boss

    Selling

    Whats in it or me?

    Involving

    Heres what I think

    All employees, regardless o their generation,

    place a high value on being satisfed with

    their job, eeling secure in it and being well

    rewarded or doing it.

    30 Adapted by the researchers from the ndings of this project and a combination

    o other sources, including Downing (2006) ; Eisner (2005) and QAS A (n.d.).

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    39/56

    37An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences 37An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    40/56

    38 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    6

    iplcasr h

    hspalydusry

    Gen Y needs to be seen as a management

    opportunity rather than a challenge. They

    are, ater all, the leaders o the uture.

    w p p

    G Y ply l b

    g ppy llg. ty ,

    ll, l .

    Ladg rgasas arud h

    wrld dy challgs ad cra

    srags ad acs whch ur

    hs challgs val cpv

    advaag. Accrdgly, w suggs

    ha hr ar hua rsurc

    srags ha ay hspaly busss

    ca alr hr parcular pras

    ad ply bas ha ca prduc

    psv ucs r h busss,

    whhr rs crasd rvus

    ad prfs, hghr prducvy,

    prvd cusr r, r

    dcrasd sa urvr.

    Basd h varus phass h

    G Y rsarch prjc, cludg a

    sv rvw rad ad acadc

    publcas, a srs cus grups

    withhospitalityemployeesandowners/

    aagrs ad a larg-scal survy

    hspaly plys Quslad,

    w hav draw s ccluss abu

    bs pracc h aag G Y hspal y plys. W

    prs ur ccluss h r

    Ten Recommendations or Managing

    Gen Y. ths suggss d

    cssarly all crrspd drcly

    h fdgs h prvus sc,

    bu rahr, r a hlsc aalyss

    all ra ad daa surcd

    hrughu h rsarch prjc.

    6.1 ten recommendations or

    manaGinG Gen Y

    1. Get it riGht, riGht rom

    the start

    Prhaps r pra ha vr s

    surg ha yu hr wll. Ad hs s

    ly bcaus h agbl ad

    agbl css urvr, bu rahr

    bcaus h prac G Y

    placs c-wrkr rlashps advalu alg wh hr plyr.

    Rcru ad slc s ad

    hocinthehospitalityindustry.Frequently

    s d by l aagrs wh ll r

    rag h cssary kwldg,

    sklls ad arbus cssary r hs

    ask). Y hr s dub ha cv

    HRm praccs (parcularly rcru

    ad slc) d happ by

    accd! Br rcrug ad hrg,

    csdr h valus h pal

    rcru, G Y r hrws, ad hw h

    prs wll f wh h rgasa. t, rcrurs cus a caddas

    curr lvl sklls ad kwldg,

    rahr ha h bggr pcur

    h dvdual, wha hy blv ad

    hr gral dsps wrk ad

    l. Capals r r h

    Photo courtesy of Mirvac

    Hotels and Resorts

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    41/56

    39An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences

    ay ls avalabl hs days, such

    asbehaviouralinterviewingtechniques.

    ths ca allw yu srk h prcbalac bw sklls dd r a

    parcular rl, ghr wh a bld

    valus bw h prspcv

    ply ad h rgasa. Hrg

    s always pra, bu w blv ha

    cvly aag G Y, s v

    r pra.

    oc hrd, h prs wh rgh

    valus ad h rgh ra r yur

    busss ca dvlp h spcfc sklls

    ha ar cssary b ully cp

    h apprpra rl. i a rcprcal

    prcss, wh a busss prvds

    dvlp ad larg pprus

    r h w G Y ply, hy wll

    lkly rspd kd wh c

    h rgasa ad psv

    cusr-rd bhavurs. r

    G Y rcrus, ds sp hr,

    as hy d gg prrac

    apprasals ad rcg ( jus

    aually!).

    llwg carul rcru prcsss,

    h ra ad scalsa w

    plys s crucal. Dvlpg hkds psv auds ha lad

    pra busss ucs s r

    challgg arly ur plys,

    parcularly hy ar G Y, s carul

    a us b pad h a hs

    sag. Rgular llw-ups chck

    prgrss ad prvd dback wll b

    psvly rcvd by G Y plys.

    D lav s wks (r wrs sll,

    ll h 3 h prba prd s up!)

    fd u hw yur w ply s

    fg say uch wh h a

    wkly, v daly, bass (clvr us

    chlgy ca b hlpul hr).

    2. Get enGaGed! emPLoYee

    enGaGement is essentiaL

    eply gag has b

    shw b h s pra

    drvrs psv busss ucs.

    Bchark glbal hspaly cpas

    cla b abl prdc chags

    h prag prrac dvdual

    busss us basd chags h

    lvl ply gag!

    egagg h G Y ply s abu

    vlvg h hw ad why h

    busss pras, rahr ha jus

    llwg a s srucs whuaskingquestions.Onewaytodo

    hs s gvallyur plys h

    ppruy prc yur busss

    as a cusr wuld, s hy rally ca

    pu hslvs h cusrs shs.

    r h G Y ply, hs wll b

    parcularly pra. may h wll

    cssarly hav vr prcd

    h yp hspaly pras yu

    ar rug r hperspective o a

    customer. may h larg hl chas

    alrady r hr plys a r gh

    -hus. Rsauras ad clubs, sad rg a r sa dscu, shuld

    csdr rg r r sgfcaly

    dscud dg pprus

    hr sa. ths s shg haany

    busss ca d, rgardlss sz r

    dusry scr s a larg cs

    ad h rurs ar asurabl.

    Ahr way cras h lvl

    gag yur G Y sa s

    rally shw ha yu valu hr

    pu. Acvly sk hr dback

    praal prcsss ad cusr

    srvc ssus. o curs, yu wll

    vr b abl ac vryhg

    hy suggs, bu wh a asphr

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    42/56

    40 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    p dalgu, yu wll b abl

    pla why yu gh b abl

    cu parcular suggss. As aaddd bf, vry w ad h, yu

    wll g a g a da (r r!) ha

    wll r-shap yur busss ad s prf

    args r h br.

    W ca phass ugh h

    prac ply gag

    r yur busss alrady h larg

    hl cpas acvly asur hw

    gagd hr plys ar a rgular

    bass, ad aagrs ar rwardd,

    par, h bass prvg hs

    scrs. W wuld lk spd r

    addrssg hs pc, bu s

    byd h scp hs rpr. isad

    w rr h radr a cll

    bk ha s ly asy rad bu

    als rly sghul eply

    egag: tls r Aalyss, Pracc

    ad Cpv Advaag31.

    3. BuiLd a comPanY cuLture

    that is nurturinG and

    coLLaBorative

    G Y placs gra valu rdshps,c-wrkr rlashps ad rus,

    ad hy hrv wrkg ghr

    achv gals. Ds yur busss

    haveastatementofvalues?Establish

    s yu d alrady hav ay! i

    yur plys wr ayusly

    survyd, wuld hy ss ha h

    wrk vr was whch card

    forthewellbeingoftheemployees?

    th culur a rgasa h

    vr (physcal, prcdural ad

    scal) ha h ply prcs

    whl a wrk plays a larg par

    drg ply auds. Ds

    yur cpays culur sd ssags

    31 Macey, W.H., Schneider, B., Barbera, K.M. & Young, S.A.

    (2009) . Employee engagement: Tools or analysis, practice, and

    competitive advantage. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.40 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    43/56

    41An exAminAtion o work attitude differences

    Following careful recruitment,

    the orientation and socialisation

    of new employees is crucial.

    32 Michelli, J. A. (2008) . The New Gold S tandard: 5 Leadership Principles for Creating a Legendary

    Customer Experience Courtesy of the Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company. New York, McGraw-Hill.

    yur plys ha hy ar valud

    ad rspcd? i s hg say yu

    valu ad rspc yur plys, buplcs ad acs ha ar algd

    wh hs prcpls wll udr

    such sas ad sd h pps

    ssag h sa.

    t curag ad suppr awrk,

    r as ad bas s asurs

    a prrac whrvr pssbl.

    r sac, a cv sys culd

    rward dvdual prrac (.g.

    al sals pr hur) whl a h sa

    prvdg cvs r h u

    as a whl wh cusr sasac

    args ar achvd. Always kw yur

    cpays audal udrcurr

    ad r G Y, h r ururg ad

    cllabrav, h br.

    Aga, a -dph dscuss

    rgasaal culur s pssbl

    hs rpr. Alhugh hr ar ay

    sal s rgasaal culur

    (s ably ha edgar Sch),

    r rsd radrs w rcd

    a r rlva ad praccal bk

    r hspaly wrs ad aagrs

    A nw Gld Sadard32

    . thsbk as h phlsphs ad

    srags h Rz-Carl hl

    cpay ha hav b srual

    h cra s wrld-rwd

    cpay culur.

    4. encourage opportunities

    for learning and growth

    through challenging

    work

    G Y placs hgh valu larg

    ad dvlp. thy br asly ad

    crav plyrs ha r prks such as

    u rburs, sabbacals, ad

    hr grwh ad rag pprus.

    obvusly, hs ar hgs ha s

    hspaly bussss (hr ha hvry larg ulaals) ca ard,

    s cus wha yu ca d. ral

    rag ad dvlp prgras

    asd, hr ar rqu pprus

    r larg ad grwh wh h

    hspaly wrkplac ha g

    grd. ms sasd hspaly

    prssals ak hr w lvl

    kwldg r grad. Ask yursl:

    Wha busss acvs ca i vlv

    y sa s ha hy ca lar ad

    grw prssally? Udrsadg

    par lvls, placg sck rdrs, larg

    rad ad udrsad acal

    fash rprs all hs sgly

    uda asks ca b a wrld

    larg r a prcd ply

    ha hy gh hrws b

    psd hr prary rl.

    i wll als pay dvdds d a

    hs apprasal yur rag budg.

    Sall bu css vs

    rag prgras wll pay lg-r

    dvdds ly ply lyaly

    bu als hr lvls c

    ad gag. Rbr ha allgra hspaly cpas vr vw

    rag as a gd s ly ps.

    Rahr, rag ad sa dvlp

    bc h urs dd r a

    halhy ad susaabl wrkrc.

    Lk r , G Y vws sl as

    qual ldr plys. i hr ys,

    hr crbu s jus as valuabl as

    ay lss, rgardlss prvus

    prc. thy wll s as ar

    ha hy hav d a parcular ask

    jus bcaus hy ar w (has rgh,

    yur gg hav d a w

    raal r wh has rv h

    chwg gu r udr h abls!).

    thy dslk bg hadd h gru

    jbs, r jbs whch hy hav

    pay hr dus. thy sk challggwrk rgh r h sar. oc

    wrk cass b a challg, w

    prcs ad larg pprus

    wll d b ud. Pla ahad s

    as b caugh ll-prpard. Ad

    always rbr ha G Y s asly

    dsracd! mulaskg s lk brahg

    hs plys. Yull d b

    h ball kp h vlvd, wh w

    ad challgg asks, s ha hy d

    ls rs.

    5. do not to assume thatgen Y has had the same

    home training as past

    generations

    Prhaps du hr rlac

    chlgy, hs graal grup

    ss b a b bhd ac-

    -ac cuca sklls. Wha

    usd b gd h rag s

    cssarly ru r hs gra.

    ths ssu s parcularly rlva r

    havy ac--ac cac pss.

    Rl play rag ad qupracc r srvc plys wh

    ar gg b rgular cac wh

    cusrs (spcally ldr cusrs)

    s r cssary ha yu gh

    hk! Cusr dssasac asd,

    awkward ad barrassg racs

    wh cusrs gh b ugh ur

    a G Y ply hr jb. may

    hs prcs ca b avdd

    by gvg h ply r sgh

    wha s ha ach cusr s

    pcg.

    Suprvsrs shuld b gv apprpra

    rag ad suppr dvlp h sklls

    cssary dal wh h rcacs

  • 8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences

    44/56

    42 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS

    communicating with

    your employees in their own

    language will help to engage

    your Gen Y employees.

    33 Palrey, J., & Gasser, U. ( 2008). Born digital: Understanding

    the rst generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.

    aagg ppl. th ral

    carr pah sppg up r

    srvr suprvsr ha s c h dusry s cll r carr

    prgrss, y lacks h

    associatedtrainingrequiredinthe

    w s cssary sklls. G Y

    plys wll lk hr suprvsrs

    forrolemodelsandwilloftenequate

    (as cusrs d) h ra

    hy rcv r h suprvsr as

    cg r h rgasa. A pr

    prc wh a prcd ad

    urad suprvsr culd ls yu a

    valud rl ply.

    6. Get out o deniaL! use

    technoLoGY to imProve

    communication with

    Your sta

    is g u chlgy dal

    ha hugh ha i jus gr , wll

    g away! Ulk ay h hspaly

    ld schl, G Y plys ak

    lcrc cllabra r grad.

    Whrvr pssbl, us a chlgcal

    plar prvd cpay ra

    ad rag duls plys - bu

    ak sur wrks ad s slw ad

    rusrag us. obvusly sz ad

    rsurcs wll dr h

    whch ra chlgy ca b

    usd hac a busss, bu hr

    ar ways ha sall cpas ca

    br uls lcrc cuca

    whu gra ps. tap h way

    yur G Y plys cuca

    wh ach hr. Ca pra s

    r aucs b shrd f

    intoacomputer-generatedSMS?Can

    yu advrs days shs hrugh

    acbk ssag all avalabl

    employees?

    Crag a scal da prsc ad

    cucag wh yur plys

    hr w laguag wll hlp gagyur G Y plys. Wh a ll

    va, s pssbl wak hs

    plars g h plys sar

    buldg hyp abu yur busss

    whch aus r advrsg.

    Alhugh h sallr busss prars

    radg hs gh hk byd

    hr scp, h raly s ha scal

    da ss ar a r srvc. t

    adsrg such ss s bvusly a

    ssu, bu hs ca b a rspsbly

    yu gv a rusd ad agr G Y

    ply.

    i add hs cuca

    plars, rvw yur plcs abu

    usg bl chlgy a wrk

    csdr lsg h ruls a b. r

    yu, usg bl phs sd

    ssags ad chckg acbk

    whl a wrk s dsrspcul, bu

    G Y, s par lvg. Csdr hs:

    a survy h US ud ha a gra

    ajry G Y plys wuld ak

    a jb wh lss pay ha hr curr

    allwd h grar us

    bl dvcs whl a wrk. Scpas day allw a cra ubr

    us pr day sur h ad

    d alg, c. Alhugh hs ay

    always f wh h cs rsras a

    hospitalityoperation,reectonhowthis

    ccp gh b adapd f yur

    business.Allowingemployeestoquickly

    chck ad rspd s hr

    dw, wh rasabl budars

    (hr ar da cusr

    ds srv, c.), s as bcg a

    cssary ccss ak rdr

    kp G Y plys vad

    ad cusd. i yur busss has a

    brak r, pug a cpur hr

    (nothingash,anoldoneoracheap

    w ) s yur sa ca say uch

    br hr sh ad hr braks wll

    b wll rcvd.

    thr ar ay rsg bks ad

    arcls avalabl whch prvd sghs

    h way chlgy s usd

    cuca bh prsally ad

    h wrkplac. As a gd apl, w

    suggs Br Dgal: Udrsadg

    h rs Gra Dgal navs33.

    7. revitaLise Your oLd

    recoGnition ProGrams

    Bcaus h valu hy plac pras, gu wrk rcg

    prgras ar wll rcvd by G

    Y plys. eply rcg

    ca ak ay rs ca b r

    suprvsr ply (haks, gra

    jb day, yu rally ar gg br a

    aagg yur sc!), r pr-

    -pr (plys ag hr

    a brs r spcal rcg),

    a-basd (rcg rvu,

    prf r cusr sasac args

    achvd by h a), r rgasa-

    wd (publcsd awards r usadgprrac r dsra

    cpay valus).

    B crav wh yur rcg

    schs wh G Y, h r

    vav ad -h-wall h da,

    h r lkly s va h.

    Brg vary h way yur rcgs

    plys vry wll b

    vad prr h sa way,

    s b prpard rcgs ppl r

    dr als ad sklls.

    tak c