Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
-
Upload
pablo-alarcon -
Category
Documents
-
view
228 -
download
0
Transcript of Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
1/56
Generation Y
as hospitalitY
industrY emploYeesAn examination of work attitude differences
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
2/56
UQ School of Tourism
The University o Queensland (UQ) is one o Australias
premier learning and research institutions and is ranked
among the worlds top 50 Universities. It is the oldest
university in Queensland and has over 40,000 students
currently enrolled. UQ is a ounding member o the elite
Group o Eight (Go8), a coalition o leading Australian
universities, intensive in research and comprehensive in
general and proessional education.
Nested in the aculty o Business, Economics and Law, the
UQ School o Tourism (UQST) is the earliest established
university tourism school in Australia, and is the only
dedicated tourism school within the Go8. The UQST is the
only University School in Australia to be TedQual accredited
by the United Nations World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO).
With over 700 students studying under- and post-graduate
programs in tourism, hospitality and event management, the
UQST is recognised, both nationally and internationally, as
a leading centre o research with close links to government
and industry. An impressive list o academic sta actively
publish their research in the worlds top journals in tourism,
hospitality and related felds and are o ten called upon to
speak both nationally and internationally, and consult on
tourism and related matters.
For more inormation, go to www.uq.edu.au
Hospitality Training Association
The Hospitality Training Association Inc (HTA) has been
serving the needs o the hospitality industry or over twenty
years. HTA brings together the combined experience
and knowledge o the fve major associations that are the
driving orce behind the tourism and hospitality industries in
Queensland, Australia: the Hotel Motel & Accommodation
Association; Clubs Queensland; the Restaurant & Catering
Association o Queensland; the Liquor, Hospitality& Miscellaneous Union; and the Queensland Hotels
Association.
Developed to support these associations with specialised
training in each o their areas o discipline and expertise, HTA
has assisted thousands o young people establish careers
in hospitality and tourism. Through the provision o short
courses, certifcates and diploma qualifcations, HTA College
provides nationally and internationally recognised training
in all acets o tourism and hospitality. Situated close to the
city-centre in Fortitude Valley, HTA's training acilities include
three commercial kitchens, a pastry lab, two restaurants,
a cocktail/lounge bar, and multimedia-equipped training
rooms.
For more inormation, go to www.hta.org.au
Acknowledgement: Hotel room photo on front
cover courtesy of Hilton Hotels and Resorts
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
3/56
1An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
7 bruary, 2011
d r,
ths rpr aas r a cls wrkg parrshp bw ur rspcv sus. W hav ud gra syrgs bw
h Hspaly trag Assca a wrld class prva rag rgasa ad h Schl turs a h Uvrsy
Quslad rakd ag h wrlds tp 50 Uvrss. ths rpr rprss a ubr cllabrav prjcs br
u ur cpra.
Hr, w prs h rsuls a rsarch prjc ha had s bggs as a dusry prbl: h challgs , ad h d
ga a br udrsadg abu Gra Y as hspaly dusry plys. oc hs d was dfd, a cprhsv
ad rbus rsarch prgra was dsgd ad s dald hs rpr. (n: W wuld als lk ackwldg h crbu
ad hs prjc by Dr Paul Barr wh has sc rlcad napr Uvrsy Sclad. Paul was a par h rgal
rsarch a ad was gral h ra ad arly sags h rsarch prjc.)
th rsarch dsg r hs prjc cludd:
acomprehensivereviewofalltherelevantpastresearchundertakenregardinggenerationaldifferencesinworkforceattitudes;
focusgroupstoeshoutthekeyissues;
theselectionofkeyemployeecriteriamostvaluableintermsofunderstandingdifferencesacrossgenerationalgroups;
thecreationofaquestionnairedesignedtocaptureactualemployeeattitudes;
thecollectionofdataacrossdifferentsectorsofthehospitalityindustryinQueensland;
acomprehensiveandstatisticallyrobustanalysisofthedata;
somepracticalsuggestionsabouthowtointerpretandusethedata.
Lg br hs prjc ccd, bca bvus ay ha ply va, larg syls, pcas,
prrac ad hr rlad acrs vary r r r ay pssbl rass (graal grupg, gdr, dpar,ccupa c.). t da, hwvr, ll scfc vdc has b gahrd rvw hs drcs ad ga a ull
udrsadg h, spcally as hy pra h hspaly dusry.
W hp yu fd hs rpr usul, ad w wlc cs ad dback.
Rgards,
Plp cl d d sl
c e o G Y r P L
Hspaly trag Assca Uvrsy Quslad, Schl turs
Email:[email protected] Email:[email protected]
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
4/56
2 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
ecuvSuary
eply ply
y b
. o p, ply glbl y,
pg bl
pp,
ly y l,
-p, y g. o
, y lg
b by l
,
ll- ply.
may hs ssus s r h
hr characrscs ad cds
h dusry .g. s ppl--
ppl racs, a-scal wrkg
hurs, ad a pr rpua as a lg-
r carr p. thr ar pr
apls hspaly rgasas
arud h glb ha hav sugh
cba s hs c
ssus, alhugh v hy hav b
challgd by h las hua rsurc
ssu cr h dusry h
rac Gra Y (G Y) as h
ws chr hspaly plys.
Wh radcally dr wrk-rlad
valus ad auds prvusgras, h G Y ply has
cudd wrkplacs arud h
glb. As a radal plyr
yugr sa, h hspaly dusry
has b parcularly acd by hs
w gra. thr s uch hyp
surrudg G Y plys h
ppular da, y hr s ll prcal
vdc suppr ay h clas
ad abu h. Rsarch ha has
b cducd da has b sall-
scal ad largly dscrpv aur,
ad has rarly ak h spcfc c
h hspaly dusry accu.
Rcgsg hs shrcg, h basc
as h prjc wr :
reviewanddistilthecurrentliterature
abu ply wrk auds ad
GenY;
identifyrelevant(academic/
practical)areasforresearch;
examinearangeofwork-related
audal ad bhavural
csrucs cparg G Y
othergenerationalgroups;
developpracticalsolutionsand
apprachs r hspaly wrs
ad aagrs.
ths rpr syhsss h fdgs
a hr-yar rsarch prjc ad
a br udrsadg h pac
h ws ad s--b largs
gra plys w h
hspaly dusry. Udrpg
hs rpr s h prs ha hr
s rus valu prgrssg ur
udrsadg h ccs
bw ply auds ad
prcps hr wrk vr,
ad dsrd rgasaal ucs
such as cusr sasac, cusr
lyaly, wrd uh advcacy,
rvu grwh ad prfably.
icludd hs rpr ar h rsuls
sascal aalyss ru a survy
vr 900 hspaly plys
Queensland.Thequestionnairewas
dsgd cllc ra
ply dgraphc varabls, as
wll as a slc asurs dd
capur crcal ply auds
ad ps rgardg hr wrk
vr. th cludd asurs
wr slcd basd a sablshd
lk wh psv rgasaal
ucs.
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
5/56
3An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
Chaprs 1 ad 2 prvd a backgrud
h rsarch prbl wh a plaa
h ply auds ha wrdfd as pval bh succssully
aagg G Y ad achvg pal
busss ucs h hspaly
dusry. Chaprs 3 ad 4 dscrb
h hds ad fdgs r h survy
phas daa cllc, hghlghg h
Ten Key Findings (pag 33).
ms ably ad s rlva hs
rpr s h spl ac ha G Y
plys scr lwr audal
asurs ha a rgasa shuld
b apg as, ad hghr
hs whch shuld b lwr. i hr
wrds, G Y plys ar LeSS
sasfd wh hr jbs, LeSS gagd
hr wrk, ad LeSS cd
h rgasa hy wrk r ha
hr -G Y curpars. Slarly,
G Y plys dsplay hghr scrs
h csrucs ha a rgasa
wuld wa s s sa.r apl, G Y plys ar
MORElikelytobeplanningtoquittheir
jbs, moRe lkly prr prly
hr c-wrkrs ar dg s, ad ar
als moRe lkly swch jbs r
parcular ras.
Chaprs 5 ad 6 prvd a dald
dscuss h rsuls as wll as a Ten
Recommendations or Managing Gen
Ysc (pag 38) whch ar draw
r h rsuls hs prjc ad
whch, pld wh h G Ywrkrc, wll lkly prv h vrall
wrk prrac hs graal
grup ad hrr bf ly h
dvdual hspaly busss, bu als
h dusry as a whl.
th rpr ccluds Chapr 7 wh
somereectionsandnalremarks.
Sgfca drcs s h
auds G Y plys h
wrkplac. ths sudy s h
frs cllc prcal daa b
abl spcy wha h drcs
ar, ad hw hy wll pac h
aag plys hspaly
bussss. ths rsarch rprss,
h had, a ap fll a
gap h acadc lraur rgardg
graal drcs wrk-rlad
auds ad valus. o h hr had,
ad r praly r hspaly
busss wrs ad prars,
hs rsarch has prvdd praccal
rcdas, basd scfc
vdc, as hw bs gag wh
hs graal grup h hspaly
wrkplac.
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
6/56
4 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
7/56
5An exAminAtion o work attitude differences
executive summary 2
List of figures 6
1 Background to the generation y Project 8
1.1 Wha s a gra ad hw ds uc h wrkplac? 9
1.2 Wha aks Gra Y ck? 9
1.3 Lkg ply auds busss succss 11
2 what we measured and why 14
2.1 Jb Sasac 14
2.2 eply egag 15
2.3 orgasaal Czshp Bhavur 16
2.4 orgasaal C 16
2.5 Prcvd Suprvsry ad orgasaal Suppr 17
2.6 Prcvd arss 17
2.7 trag ad Dvlp opprus 17
2.8 Rwards ad Rcg 18
2.9 Prcvd Jb Scury ad eplyably 18
2.10 Qu is ad Jb Swchg Bhavur 18
2.11 iuc C-wrkr Prrac 19
3 research design and methods 20
3.1 Sapl characrscs 20
4 findings 24
4.1 Rags ky ply dcs 25
4.1.1 G Y vs -G Y 25
4.1.2 G Y 1s, 2d ad 3rd wavs 26
4.2 iprac ky ply dcs 27
4.2.1 G Y vs -G Y 27
4.2.2 G Y 1s, 2d ad 3rd wavs 28
4.3 ohr ucs ky ply dcs 29
4.3.1 Drcs by dusry scr 294.3.2 Drcs by lgh ply (ur) 30
4.3.3 Drcs bw suprvsry ad -suprvsry plys 31
4.3.4 Drcs by ply saus 32
4.4 t ky fdgs r h survy hspal y plys 33
5 discussion of resuLts 34
6 imPLications for the hosPitaLity industry 38
6.1 t rcdas r aagg G Y 38
1. G rgh, rgh r h sar 38
2. G gagd! eply gag s ssal 39
3. Buld a cpay culur ha s ururg ad cllabrav 40
4. ecurag pprus r larg ad grwh hrughchallgg wrk 41
5. D assu ha G Y has had h sa h rag
as pas gras. 41
6. G u dal! Us chlgy prv cuca
wh yur sa 42
7. Rvals yur ld rcg prgras 42
8. B prpard b r bl ha yu hugh cssary 43
9. d ways r h w lar r h ld (ad vc vrsa!) 43
10. Rcgs ad rspc dvdualy 44
6.2 t rcdas r aagg G Y: Suary 45
7 finaL remarks 46
BiBLiograPhy 48
aPPendix a emPLoyee indices: survey items 50
tabl Cs
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
8/56
g 1: th G Y rsarch dl 12
g 2: Ky ply dcs 15
g 3: Rspds by dusry scr 20
g 4: Rspds by graal grup 21
g 5: Gdr rspds 21
g 6: Hghs lvl duca cpld 21
g 7: tur rspds 22
g 8: Pss hld by rspds 22
g 9: eply saus rspds 22
g 10: Suary ky ply dcs 24
g 11: Ky ply dcs: G Y vs. -G Y 25
g 12: Ky ply dcs by G Y wav 26
g 13: iprac ky dcs: G Y vs. -G Y 27
g 14: iprac ky dcs by G Y wav 28
g 15: Ky ply dcs by dusry scr 29
g 16: Ky ply dcs by ur 30
g 17: Ky ply dcs by ps 31
g 18: Ky ply dcs by ply saus 32
g 19: Cpars characrscs: G Y, G x ad Baby Brs 36
Ls gurs
6 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
9/56
7An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
10/56
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
11/56
9An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
the work-related attitudes o Gen Y
employees are regarded as radically dierent
to those o previous generations entering theworkorce.
udrsadg ply va,
auds ad prrac.
1.1 what is a Generation and
how does it inLuence the
workPLace?
A gra s dfd as a
dfabl grup ha shars brh
yars, ag lca ad sgfca
l vs a crcal dvlpal
sags, dvdd by fv [] sv yars
h frs wav, cr grup ad las
wav1. A gra, h, s a chr
ppl wh shar slar scal r
hsrcal prcs, whch ac h
way brs vw ad rpr h
wrld. th shard prcs wll hav
aninuenceonhowamemberofa
gra ls wards auhry ad
rgasas, wha hr wrk-rlad
valus ar, ad hw a prs wuld ac
sasy hr valus ad dsrs.
Asmanagersasserttheirowninuence
h rag uur ladrs, ach
gra wll cu r-df
h rgasaal vr
ad hw busss pras ar
cducd, crag plcas r argasas culur, hcs ad hua
rsurcs plcs ad prcdurs.
Rsarch cducd acrss dd
prds has ud ha wrk valus
aremoreinuencedbygenerational
prcs ha by ag r aury2.
thr s s dba bh h
ppular da ad acadc lraur
vr h prcs yar rags ach
graal grup days wrkplac.
thr wll aurally b s vrlap ad
slars bw hs br arud
h dgs ach graal rag.
Hwvr, a l ds d b draw
swhr r aalycal purpss.
Accrdgly, ar csdrg h
ajry vw, h graal cu-s
ur sudy ar dfd as llws:
Generation Y
br bw 1979 ad 1994
Generation x
br bw 1965 ad 1978
BaBY Boomers
br bw 1945 ad 1964
G Y currly ubrs 4.65 ll
ppl Ausrala, r 21 prc
h al Ausrala wrkrc3. r h
hspaly dusry, hs prpr s
v grar G Y aks up arly
a hrd (30%) al plys4. ths
fgurs wll grw draacally h
dcad. By 2020, h prpr
G Y plys h wrkrc wll
dubl 42%, whl Baby Brs wll
dcl r 36% h (al Ausrala)
wrkrc jus 15%5. th pac h
hspaly dusry wll lgcally b acu.
i ay cs, h wrk-rlad
characrscs ad auds G Y
plys ar rgardd as radcally
dr hs prvus gras
rg h wrkrc. ths
characrscs ad auds ar a dds
wh cval hkg hw w
ras h wrkplac shuld hk
ad ac. As radcal as G Ys audsay r ay b, hs auds ar
hlss udaal drg
h srvc ra a hspaly
rgasa ad shuld, hrr, b
gv srus csdra. Drg
hw bs alr prvalg ply
srags ach h vaal,
rag ad dvlp ds
G Y plys appars b h
ajr hua rsurc challg r h
hspaly dusry h uur.
i h llwg sc, w prvd a
suary h basc characrscs G Y. our suary s draw prcpally
r a rvw acadc ad rad
publcas ad s grad wh h
fdgs a rud prlary cus
grups cducd by h rsarch a
r hs prjc.
1.2 what makes Generation Y
tick?
G Y chldr hav grw up
relativeafuence,withglobaleconomic
prspry ad lw uplyhrughu hr lvs. Alhugh y
has vr b a ajr ccr, hy
hav lvd a ucra wrld, a wrld
wh rrrs ad ajr vral
shocks,connected24/7totheevents
h wrld hrugh advacs
ra chlgy. mul-askg
1 Kupperschmidt, B.R. (2000) . Multigeneration employees: strategies or eective management. The Health Care Manager, 19:65-76.2 Smola, K.W., & Sutton, C.D. (2002). Generational dierences: revisiting generational work values or the new millennium. Journal o
Organizational Behaviour, 23( 4): 3 63-382.3 McCrindle Research. (2010). Snapshot: Australia approaching peak labour.
4 Cairncross, G., & Buultjens, J. (2007). Generation Y and work in the tourism and hospitality industry: problem? what problem?.
Centre or Enterprise Development and Research, Occasional Paper No. 9.5 See McCrindle (2010) as above.
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
12/56
10 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
s a hab, whr 30 hurs c
ca b crad a 7-hur prd6.
ths s prcs cras a lwlrac r brd ad G Y ca
b vry slcv h way hy
rcv ra h r
racv s, h r wll pull h
wards .
G Y s usd lg cludd ad
havg hr p hard. ths s as
a rsul havg r vlv
aly dcss ha prvus
gras ad lvg a h r lgr
ar fshg schl. ths c ra
has ld G Y sprg b lablld
as KiPPeRS - Kds Pars Pck
erdg Rr Savgs. i appars
ha aly s r pra
G Y ha prvus gras. ths
uc s dsrad by h rsuls
a sudy h US ha shw ha ly
12 13 prc G Y ar wrk-
crc (.. hs wh plac grar
prac wrk ha aly) ad 50
prc ar aly-crc, cpard
wh 22 prc Baby Brs wh
ar wrk-crc ad 41 prc bg
aly-crc7.
i a wrkg c, h G Y
ply s dscrbd as r
dadg ha w plys hav
vr b br. thy ar arad
prssg hr ps. Wh a lw
lrac r brd, G Y hrvs
w challgs ad pcs b
shw rspc ad gv rspsbly
r arly hr ply.
ths w gra s rlychlgcally lra, sl-rla,
dpd, ad lkg r sa
rwards, whr lg-r as
wlv hs. ths plys ar
pcg ak a crbu
shg wrhwhl, hav hr
pu rcgsd r h sar ad
ar wllg pu yars srvc
rdr ga ay sgfca rward
r hr plyr. i h wrkplac,
hy sk csa dback, v
a daly bass. o h whl, hy dslk
al ad rpv wrk ad sk wchallgs rgularly.
In the workplace,
Gen Y seeks constant
eedback, even on a
daily basis.
i gral, G Y rcrus pc
jy hr jbs, ad ar parcularly
ccrd wh arss h
wrkplac barg d ha hr
da arss ay b h sa as
yurs! r sac, hy d hk
s ar ha hy shuld hav wa yars
b rwardd r hr pu, wh
hy ar akg a valuabl crbu
w. G Y plys ar cllabrav
aur, phassg awrk ad
pcg b daly rcgsd
ad rspcd r hr pu. Alhugh
rc cc crcusacs culd
hav b pcd alr s
hs auds, h gral cssus
s ha hs c G Y ras sll
hld ru.
Multi-tasking isa habit, where 30
hours o content can
be crammed into a
7-hour period.
Gen Y is used to eeling included
and having their opinion heard.
6 Millwood, A. (2007) . The young and the restless. Nations Restaurant News, 41(5), 132-133.7 Families & Work Institute. (2002). Generation & gender in the workplace, Families & Work Institute,
Retrieved rom
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
13/56
11An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
G Y pc b prasd r hr
rs, rahr ha ly r hr rsuls
- hs s lkly du bg rasd
-cpv vrs ha
plac prac parcpa vr
fshg frs. th plcas hs
r prrac aag wll b
sgfca. G Y plys, havg
pu a l r a ask, y havg
achvd h dsrd uc, wll sll
pc hr ap b rcgsd
ad ackwldgd.
ergg rsarch suggss ha
hs gra s r ducad ad
cfd ha prvus gras8
ad hy ar h sars gra
vr9. ths wuld suggs a asr
ably lar, dvlp ad adap h
wrkplac. Gv hs, s surprsg
h ha G Y plys wuld dsr
grar rspsbly ad vlv
wrkplac dcss ad prcsss
r arlr hr ply ur.
G Y plys pc a wd
rag agbl rwards, cludg
pwr, rspc, rcg
as a dvdual, a havy vs
rag ad dvlp, vary
daly wrk, rd wrk s
w av, scp r cravy
s wrk, wrkplac vlv,
ccr r ply wlar ad
supprv aag (hy d
wantmuch,dothey?).Sociallyand
vrally acv rgasas
ar parcularly aracv h ypcal
G Y ply. i has b bsrvd
by s prs ha bg gr ca
b a cv r sragy r h
G Y chr.
Gv chagg ply
dgraphcs ad auds, supply-
dad balacs h wrkrc,
as wll as vr-grwg dad r
hspaly bussss, s crasgly
bvus ha a w udrsadg
ply valus, auds, ad
bhavurs s dd hspaly
rgasas ar susa a
cpv advaag hrugh srvc.
t ha d, h llwg sc wll
dscuss h ccpual rawrk ad
udrpg lgc whch hs G Y
rsarch prjc s basd.
1.3 LinkinG emPLoYee
attitudes to Business
success
ths rpr rducs, plas ad
uss ay ccps ad prcpls
spusd by h dscpl kw
as organisational psychology.orgasaal psychlgy cuss
h pac ha dvduals, grups ad
srucurs hav bhavur h
wrkplac. orgasaal psychlgy
s h applca r s
psychlgcal acs ad prcpls
h prbls ccrg hua bgs
prag wh h c busss
ad dusry. mr sply, rgasaal
psychlgy s h scfc sudy h
rlashp bw ppl ad h
wrld wrk.
Gv h hr ppl-rlad ssus
d h pg paragraphs,
sudyg h rlashp bw
ppl ad hr wrk s parcularly
rlva ad apprpra h sudy
hspaly aag. Wh w rr
h psychlgy h wrkrc, w
rr h auds hld by wrkrs,
andtheinuencethatattitudeshave
bhavur, parcularly rla
bhavur wards c-wrkrs
ad ward cusrs. i hs sudy,
w ar spcally ccrd wh
hw drcs auds acrssgras wll pac bhavur.
thr ar ay bfs, s
bvus, hrs lss, gag a br
udrsadg ply auds.
r apl, hr s grwg vdc
ha hr ar drc ccs
bw wrk vrs as
prcvd by plys ad
pra rgasaal ucs,
such as cusr sasac, cusr
lyaly ad prfably. th uda
hs prs s ha rdr
dlvr css lvls srvc,rgasas bf wh plys
vw varus aspcs hr wrkg
vr avurably (: hs s
h sa as jb sasac, whch w
rvw lar).
A prcpal cus rgasaal
psychlgy s hw prv
busss ucs by way
udrsadg h psychlgy r
Gen Y employees
are collaborativein nature,
emphasising
teamwork and
expecting to be
immediately
recognised and
respected or theirinput.
Socially and environmentally active organisations areparticularly attractive to the typical Gen Y employee.
8 Pew Research Center. (2010) Millenials: A portrait o Generation Next. Pew Research Center, Retrieved rom http://pewresearch.org/millennials/9 Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: how the Net Generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
14/56
12 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
auds wrkrs. Gag such
udrsadg ca b achvd va
a srs asurs ha hav b
dvlpd ad sd vr yars. r
h purps hs rsarch prjc, w
cpld a cprhsv ls h
s rlva asurs r hspaly
plyrs ad plys, parcular
r G Y plys. W rr ach
h asurs as a ply d,
ad ach h ky ply dcs
wll b rvwd grar dal h
llwg sc.
t ad udrsadg h rlashps
bw s h ccps
dscussd hr, gur 1 llusras h
dl whch hs rsarch prjc s
basd. ths dl was dvlpd by
h rsarchrs h al sags
hs rsarch prjc ad was rgallypublshd hJournal o Hospitality
and Tourism Management10. essally,
externalinuenceshaveaneffecton
GenYsworkvalues,whichinuence
G Ys wrk auds, ad ur,
h bhavurs ha G Y hbs a
wrk. Ulaly, h ucs ha h
plyr achvs ar acd by G
Ys wrk bhavurs.
iracg wh G Ys wrk-rlad
valus ad auds ar h hua
rsurc aag (HRm) srags
pld by h rgasa, whch
areinuencedbyinternalcharacteristics
h rgasa. th rgasaal
characrscs ad HRm srags
hav a ably arac pal G
Y plys, hs ar alg
wh G Ys wrk valus. th dyac
rac bw G Ys wrk valus
ad auds ad h HRm srags theorganisationwillinuenceGenYs
wrk bhavurs wh a rsulg pac
rgasaal ucs.
W ackwldg ha dr yps
hspaly bussss (fv sar hls
vs.backpackers;nediningvs.fast
food)havevaryingrequirementsinterms
h lvls srvc hy prvd, h
au rag dd, ad h lk.
Bu c arly all hspaly
bussss s a havy rlac sa
hua bgs wh ar h ac
h busss ad wh ca ak r
brak ach cusr prc. o
parcular rs us (ad hpully
h radrs hs rpr) s h rvrs
sd h ppl challgs c,
ha ay h wrlds bs hspaly
rgasas vw ppl challgs
as a ppruy ga cpvadvaag11.
iGure 1: the Gen Y research modeL
10 Solnet, D. & Hood, A. ( 2008). Generation Y as hospitality employees: Framing a
research agenda. Journal o Hospitality & Tourism Management 15(4): 59-68.11 For urther reading and examples o how hospitality organisations are successully
turning human resource challenges into opportunities, please see Solnet et al. (2010)
and Ford & Heaton (2001), as cited in the Bibliography.
ExtErnal InluEncEs
societal
political
technological
historical
GEn Y work valuEs
respect
recognition
input & involvement
continuous development
supportive management
fairness, tolerance, equity
concern for individual
welareGEn Y work atttItudEs
job satisfaction
motivation
organisational
commitment
GEn Y work bEhavIours
level of absenteeism
standard of performance
intention to stay/leave
orGanIsatIonal
outcomEs
Protability
Turnover
Market share
Customer retention
Reputation as an
employer
Competitive advantage
hrm stratEGIEs
recruitment & selection
induction
training & development
empowerment
supervisor support
intrinsic benets
extrinsic benets
communication
performance management
orGanIsatIonal
InluEncEs
vision
mission
values
resources & costs
expertise
strength of culture
service orientation
ATTRACTEDB
Y
ALIGNED WITH
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
15/56
In summary, people and eective
people management are, and
will always be, central to the
ultimate success o the hospitality
businesses. The entrance o Gen
Y to the hospitality workorce has,
however, prooundly altered the
way employment will be viewed and
managed in the uture. In order to
fnd new ways o approaching the
employment relationship, to the mutual
beneft o employees and employers,
it is necessary to study generational
dierences in work attitudes through
the lens o organisational psychology.
Thereore, the main purpose o this
report is to:
provideinformationtoindustry
about critical employee attitudes;
undertakeathoroughexamination
o dierences in employee
attitudes that can be attributable
to generational groups, with a
particular ocus on Generation Y;
discusstheimplicationsofthe
fndings or hospitality operators.
Having reviewed the background
and rationale or this project, we will
identiy the important aspects o
the hospitality work environment, as
perceived by employees that we can
actively measure. In other words,
we want to isolate the employee
attitudes that have direct and positive
links to employee behaviours, as
demonstrated by scientifcally rigorous
research.Forexample,weknow
rom streams o research that highly
engaged workers are more likely to
exertgreatereffortonbehalfoftheir
workplace. So, i we can measure
levels o engagement and compare
these across dierent generational
groups, we can learn about how
engagement levels vary by age.
Photo courtesy of Mirvac
Hotels and Resorts
13An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
16/56
14 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
2
t p b
ply
pp ( ) g by b
p ppl g
p f. all
l b
b p
gl , plly
-b
ply-
g.
i h radr hs rpr aks hg
ls u hs rsarch, w blv
wuld b hghly usul udrsad
h ccps suarsd blw ad
ak vry r prv ply
prcp hs ccps hr
wrkplac. A ws prs c sad
ha rug a hspaly busss s
lk akg a husad brushsrks
ach day s pssbl g
ach ad vry h all rgh
all h . Hwvr, adg
ach brush srk r hs cas
h psychlgcal dcars w hav
asurd wll craly lad br
busss ucs ha lavg all
chac.
S r ay h ply d
s lsd blw ay appar b
h sa r slar. t a , hs
s ru. Hwvr, yars rsarch ad
sascal ss hav shw ha ach
h dcs, alhugh swha
vrlappg, s sascally dsc. i s
hrr pra a ach
dpdly.
gur 2 prvds a suary ach
h ky ply dcs. urhr
dals abu ach ar rd
h sub-scs blw. r rsd
radrs, ra all h prvus
schlarly wrk rrrd , hr
drcly r drcly, s prvdd h
Bblgraphy12
. Radrs ca fd hls survy s ha rla ach
ply d Appd A.
2.1 joB satisaction
Gag a sud grasp h ccp
jb sasac s ar r cpl ha
gh ally hk. idd, has
b h subjc gg rsarch
r s h las cury. thr s a
gral bl ha jb sasac, ad
psv lgs ward s jb, hav
a psv pac wrk prrac.
essally, jb sasac dscrbs
hw c a dvdual s wh hs r
hr jb, r, h h plasurabl
r psv al sa, whch
rsuls r h valua 's
jb13.
thr s a surprsg au
cply vlvd udrsadg
hs ccp ad s rlashp wh
pra rgasaal ucs such
as cusr sasac, sa urvr,
ad rvu grwh. Rgardlss
hs cpls, s val udrsad hs pra cava: ha
sasac a jb shuld vr b
cusd wh ply va
r prrac. i s pssbl b
vry sasfd wh s jb, bu sll
unmotivatedtoperformtotherequired
sadard. ths s bcaus hr
aremanyknowninuencesonjob
sasac, cludg c-wrkrs, pay
ad bfs, cds, suprvs,
aur h wrk, aag syl
ad h lk.
thr ar hr rlad ls hugh
abu jb sasac ad ply
prrac whch suggs ha jb
Wha wasurd
ad why
12 Should any reader require further information relating to these indices or how they were incorporated
into the research design, please contact the Generation Y Project Leader, Dr David Solnet, directly.13 Locke, E.A. (1976). The nature and causes o job satisaction. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook o
Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297-349). Chicago: Rand McNally.
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
17/56
15An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
dssasac clarly has gav
pacs r a rgasa, bu ha jb
sasac, by sl, s ugh kp wrkrs vad ad prrg
wll. Rgardlss ay dscrpacy
rsarch abu jb sasac, w
blv ha s srucv udrsad
jb sasac, parcularly h
c graal drcs.
2.2 emPLoYee enGaGement
eply gag s arguably
theavourofthedayinservice
rgasas, rs wha s s
as a crcal asur succss. i s
crasgly rcgsd as a pra
acr psg rgasaal
ucs. th basc s ha h
r plys l hy ar abl
prss hr prrrd slvs a wrk,
h r hy wll vs hr wrk
rl ad hr rgasa. i hs ss,
ply gag cprss w
ajr cps. th frs, lgs
gag, dscrbs a lvad
sa rgy ad husas
wards h rgasa ad h
wrk asks. th scd cp,
gag bhavurs, ar hacs dsrad pursu
achvg rgasaal gals, such as
ask prssc, bg pracv, ad
assug addal rspsbls as
required14.
i s pra phass h
dsc bw h ccps jb
sasac ad ply gag.
Jb sasac s rlad wha a
cpay s dg r s plys ad
vlvs plys valuas such
drvrs as jb scury, bfs ad
pprus r advac. o h
hr had, gag s ccrd
wh h ull ulsa a plys
EmPloYEE IndEx brIE dEscrIPtIon
J ii The pleasurable emotional state that results rom theevaluation o one's job
Eggee The ull utilisation o an employees skills and abilities;
a positive link between individual and organisational
objectives
ogii iizeip ei Going above and beyond what is generally
accepted to be a part o an employees ormal role
requirements
ogii ie A psychological attachment to the organisation;
having a strong sense o belonging to the organisation
Peeie gii pp An employees evaluation o the extent to which their
employer values their contributions and cares abouttheir well-being
Peeie pei pp An employees evaluation o the extent to which their
direct supervisor values their contributions and cares
about their well-being
Peeie ie Perceptions o justice relating to how work is
organised and how eort is acknowledged /rewarded
tiig & eepe ppiie Perceptions regarding the investment an organisation
has made in the employee in terms o T&D
opportunities
re The extrinsic or nancial benets received in
exchange or work done
regii The acknowledgement or credit given or a job well
done or improvement in perormance
Peeie j eiy Expectations o uture job continuity in an
organisation
Peeie epyiiy How a person views their employment prospects both
within and outside an organisation
Qi iei The intention to leave ones job
J iig ei Changing jobs or changes sake, or un
c-e pee The negative infuence o poor co-worker
perormance
14 May, D. R., R. L. Gilson, et al. (2004). The psychological conditions o meaningulness, saety and availability and
the engagement o the human spirit at work, Journal o Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77(1): 11-37.
iGure 2: keY emPLoYee indices
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
18/56
16 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
sklls ad abls, ad dcas a psv
lk bw dvdual ad rgasaal
bjcvs. i hs lgh, a plyca b sasfd wh hs r hr jb,
ha pays wll ugh, s sabl ad
rs uur pprus, y sll b
gagd hr wrk, as h ply
ls udr-ulsd ad prsally
salgd wh rgasaal gals ad
valus.
2.3 orGanisationaL citiZenshiP
Behaviour
eplys ha hb rgasaal
czshp bhavurs ar hsplys ha bhav a way ha
gs abv ad byd wha s
grally accpd b a par
theirformalrolerequirements.These
czshp bhavurs rsul prvd
rgasaal ucs, r apl,
a br ss awrk rally, r
crasd cusr sasac rsuls
rally15.
Such bhavurs ar als kw
as ra-rl bhavurs, ad ar
avurabl ay rgasa,
parcularly hs ha ar rla hqualityofinterpersonalinteractions,
such as hspaly bussss. thr
ar a ubr dr yps
czshp bhavurs, cludg:
altruism(helpingotherpeopleinthe
organisation);
conscientiousness(goingwell
byd h u rl
requirementsintermsofattendance,
obeyingrules);
sportsmanship(toleratingless
ha dal crcusacs whu
complaining);
courtesy(takingproactivemeasures
topreventworkplaceproblems);
andcivicvirtue(highlevelsof
ccr abu h rgasa).
2.4 orGanisationaL
commitment
ths ccp dscrbs h psychlgcal
aach ha a ply ls (r
ds l) a rgasa. thr
ar a ubr ways whch s
ca b psychlgcally aachd hr
wrk rgasa. r h purpss
hs prjc, h yp rgasaal
c ha s s rlva s
acv (r v) c.
Acv c vlvs a grar
ss lyaly ad shard valus
bw ply ad plyr, as
ppsd c, whch arss
r a ss bl ga (rav
c) r r a lack alrav
ply ps (cuac
c)16.
Acv c a rgasa
has b shw b a pra
acr ply lyaly, ddcaad hr pra ply
prrac asurs. Wh a
prs s cd, hy dy
srgly wh, ad hav a pwrul
ss blgg , h rgasa.
Cd plys g vlvd
wrkplac avs ad acvs r
radly ad dsra a wllgss
d whavr s cssary pursu
rgasaal gals. Prvus rsarch
has shw drc asscas bw
acv rgasaal c
ad hr ky pra ply
prrac dcars such as rducd
abss, prvd jb prrac
ad lwr ras sa urvr.
15 Podsako, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H. & Fetter, R. (1990). Transormational leader behaviours and their eects
on ollowers trust in leader, satisaction, and organizational citizenship behaviours. The Leadership Quarterly 1(2): 107-142.16 Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J. & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test o a three-
component conceptualization. Journal o Applied Psychology 78( 4): 538-551.
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
19/56
17An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
2.5 Perceived suPervisorY
and orGanisationaL
suPPort
tw rlad, y dsc ccps ha
ar pra asur, parcularly
wh lkg a graal drcs
hspaly ply auds, arprcvd rgasaal suppr (PoS)
ad prcvd suprvsry suppr
(PSS). o h had, PoS dscrbs
h valua ha a ply aks
rgardg h whch hr
plyr valus hr crbus ad
cars abu hr wll-bg. o h
hr had, hr s als clar vdc
ha ply auds ar acd
ly by h acs ad auds
aagrs ad wrs (.. hs wh
ar s as sr aagrs r abv),
bu als by ay h rgasa
wh s bswd pwr ad
rspsbly, such as suprvsrs, sh
ladrs ad capas. Accrdgly, PSS
rrs h way plys prcv
suppr r hr drc suprvsr17.
Suprvsrs d play a v largr
rl ha sr aag aras
dvdual assss ad dback.
Acg as ags r h rgasa,
suprvsrs hav a prud c
plys wrk-rlad prcs.
i shuld b ls wrs ad
aagrs ha plys d sa busss as a lvg y. S h
acs ay gv pwr ar
vwd slarly. ths cras a
addal lvl cply wh a
rgasa grws ad wh r
ppl ar gv grar rspsbly.
A rsg udrpg
rgasaal ad suprvsry
suppr s scal chag hry,
whrby wrkrs d rad r
ad ddca a wrkplac r
agbl cvs such as pay, bu
als r sc-al bfs,such as s, apprval ad carg.
Assug ha srvc wrkrs bf
r prcvd suppr r hr
rgasa ad r hr suprvsr,
s pra ad usul udrsad
h dgr whch hs ccp s
prcvd drly acrss graal
grups. idd, hr s a srg
argu suggs ha h wrk-
rlad auds G Y plys
ar r lkly b acd by
hr prcps suprvsry ad
rgasaal suppr18.
2.6 Perceived airness
th arss (als kw
as jusc) has gad crasg
prac rs udrsadg
h way plys r r h
workplace.Someofthequestionsa
prs wll ask hslvs wh askdwh a duy r rspsbly ar, s ha
fair?andamIbeingpaidappropriately
r wha i d, cpars wha
othersdo?.
Lk ay hr ccps
rgasaal psychlgy, asurg
arss s cpl, ad varus ways
hav b prpsd ad sd vr
h yars. i gral, s agrd ha
udrah h brad df
arss s a ubr rrlad ways
hkg abu arss ad jusc
rgasas. Dr aspcs
arss hav dr cs
varus ply auds. th aspcs
prcvd arss ha ar s
rlva h curr sudy ad ar
capurd by h hr ky ply
dcs ar prcdural jusc (ar
h wrk prcdurs ad rslu
processesfair?)anddistributivejustice
(ismyeffortproperlyacknowledged?) 19.
Basd h backgrud rsarch
G Y, ss lkly ha hr wrk-
rlad auds wll b r acd
by hr prcps arss wha rgasa. S s cssary
cpar arss prcps acrss
graal grups.
2.7 traininG and deveLoPment
oPPortunities
Prvdg plys wh rag ad
dvlp (t&D) pprus has
lg b s as a ky l,
ly buldg hua capal, bu als
as a as prvg sa r
ad va. ths s parcularly h
cas h hspaly dusry, whr
s pra buld vsbl carr
pahs r plys. r G Y, hs
pprus r larg ad sl-
dvlp wuld s b all h
r crcal h ra wrk-
rlad auds. Accrdgly, hs d
ply p was cludd h
sudy rdr s drcs acrss
gras prcps rgardg
h vs a rgasa has
ad h ply rs t&D
pprus, ad hw hs prcp
mightinuenceotherattitudes.
17 Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Aective commitment to the organization: the
contribution o perceived organizational support. Journal o Applied Psychology 86(5) : 825-836.18 See Solnet & Hood (2008) or the ull explanation o this argument.19 Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a
measure. Journal o Applied Psychology 86(3) : 386-400.
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
20/56
18 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
2.8 rewards and recoGnition
eply prcps h rwards
ad rcg hy rcv r h
r hy r h wrkplac hav
obviousinuencesontheformationof
pra ply auds. i hs
sudy, rwards ar csdrd bh rsc, r facal, bfs ha
a ply rcvs r hr wrk.
As d prvusly, valuas
rgardg pay ad cds hav a
directinuenceonjobsatisfaction.
Rcg s csdrd b h
ackwldg ad crd r
suprvsrs, whhr prssd vrbally
r hrugh a agbl award, r a jb
wll d, r r a prv jb
prrac.
thr s a l argu h ppular
da rgardg G Y plys ha
hy ar as vad by facal
rwards as h prvus gras.
isad, rcg ad bg valud
ad rspcd r hr pu ar sad
b bggr vars. ths sudy
cluds a aa prcps
bh rwards ad rcg (as
spara dcs) rdr assss
drcs acrss gras, s
agul drcs s ad ar
rlva hr pra ply
auds.
2.9 Perceived joB securitY
and emPLoYaBiLitY
Jb scury ca b dfd as a
psychlgcal sa whr wrkrs
hav pcas (ragg r vry
lw vry hgh) uur jb cuy
wh a rgasa. Wha ss
happ wh plys s ha hy
r a subcscus psychlgcal
crac, whch s basd sgfcaly
rus ad uual gd wll. Alhughvry wrkplac s dr, ad
ars rlad a lcal cy,
dusry, uply lvls ad
wag cp ca vary, hr s
cpllg vdc ha prcvd
jb scury s a pra dcar
ply r ad va. i
ac, alg wh jyg a jb, bg
rad wll ad rcvg ar wags,
jb scury usually alls h p
grupg vars ply
prrac. S ay blv ha
hs s crrc, blvg rahr ha h
r plys ar kp dg, r
l hrad abu hr jb, h r
r hy wuld lkly apply. Hwvr,
as a rsul ay suds, hr s
vdc ha jb scury s ar r
psv ha gav h lg ru20.
Rlad h prcvd
jb scury s ha prcvd
plyably. ths ccp s dfd as
hw a prs vws hr plyprspcs wh hr w rgasa
(.g. pr, sdways v),
usd hr rgasa, bu wh
hr curr dusry, r v hr
urlad flds. Wh a ply
ls parcularly plyabl, hs
aurally has cs h prac
ha jb scury plays hr wrk
r ad prrac21.
th w dcs prcvd jb
scury ad prcvd plyably
wr cludd as a drc rsul
csdrg h ypcal prcs
ha hspaly aagrs hav had
wh hr G Y plys. G Y
plys ar dscrbd as
cfd abu hr jb prspcs
ad sgly bld h pal
r uply. Havg grw up
prsprus cc s, G
Y hav ly rcly prcd h
da cc hardshp. ev w,
ay yug plys Ausrala
hav sll b advrsly acd
by h glbal facal crss ha has
crppld h wrld rc yars.A aa drcs acrss
gras prcvd jb scury
ad plyably ad pal
cs hr auds s hrr
warrad.
2.10 Quit intentions and joB
switchinG Behaviour
Ahr rlad ccp s wh a
ply has s lav hr
jb (rahr ha wh h plyr
hps hy lav!). ths ccp sknownasintentionstoquitandis
udrsd b ahr pra
dcar ply prrac22
plys ha ar dg
lav whdraw r h
wrkplac ad d r as uch
r as hy hrws culd r
wuld. Bcaus h hgh cs (bh
agbl ad agbl) urvr,
ay rgasas ar rsd
rducg h ubr plys
wh lav h rgaza vluarly.
irsgly, s hav suggsd ha
asurg s s a r usul
ha asurg acual urvr, as
sometimes,highquitintentionsdonot
20 Khatri, N., Fern, C. T. & Budhwar, P. (2001). Explaining employee turnover in an Asian context.
Human Resource Management Journal 11(1): 54-74.21 Berntson, E., Sverke, M. & Marklund, S. (2006 ). Predicting perceived employability: Human capital
or labour market opportunities? Economic and Industrial Democracy 27(2) : 223-244.22 Colarelli, S. M. (1984). Methods o communication and mediating processes in realistic job
previews. Journal o Applied Psychology 69(4): 633-642.
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
21/56
equatetoactualturnoverduetohigh
unemploymentorothereconomic/
ral acrs.
th a drc df
betweenintentionstoquitandjob
swchg rlas h raal r
such s. Jb swchg sudrsd as a aud r bhavur
whr plys gra r jb
ahr rrspcv h way
whch hy vw hr curr rl23. ths
ccp s hghly prval wh h
labur ark avurs plys, ad
has v crad a aud ags
wrkrs ha swchg jbs s sply
u. G ar h days wh havg s
jbs w yars s s uavurably
onaresum!Consequently,itis
pcd ha G Y plys wll
scr hghr h jb swchg d
ha hr G x r Baby Br
curpars.
2.11 inLuence o co-worker
Perormance
A fal ply d cludd
hs sudy s rlad h sl-
reportedinuenceofpoorco-worker
prrac a plys w
bhavur. tha s say, a ply
ay pu lss r ha s accpabl,
r prr sadard, bcaus
a c-wrkr s als slackg . thss a ypcal asur ply
auds ha s wll accpd h
rgasaal psychlgy lraur.
Rahr, s a addd by h
rsarch a llwg h prlary
cus grups ad survy pl sg
cducd prr h a daa
cllc prcss. A ubr
parcpas h cus grups ad
pl sg phass suggsd ha
G Y plys sd b r
acd by hr prs wh ca
rg r h wrkplac.
ths da sd vald, parcularly
csdrg h rccvy,
scal wrkg ad cllabrav
wrkg syls ha appar df hs
gra.
23 Khatri, N., Fern, C. T. & Budhwar, P. (2001). Explaining
employee turnover in an Asian context. Human Resource
Management Journal 11(1): 54-74. 19An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
22/56
20 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
3
Pp y g
y g g
ply g bb gl
Ql.
th wrs ad Gral maagrs (Gm)
hspaly frs h hl, rsaura
ad club scrs wr cacd
requestaccesstotheiremployeesin
rdr cllc daa r hs rsarch. i
gral, Gms wr husasc abu
h prjc ad ay agrd hav
hr prprs parcpa. i all, wy
Quslad hspaly bussss
parcpad h sudy24.
th prary daa cllc l r
hs sudy was a papr-basd survy.
Rspds wr frs askd rpr
s dscrpv characrscs,
such as ag, gdr, ur wh curr
rgasa, ps rgasa ad
ply saus. i h a sc
h survy, rspds dcad
hr auds ( a scal 1 srgly
dsagr 7 srgly agr)25
wards a srs sas dsgd
capur h ky ply dcs
rducd h prvus sc hs
rpr. th survy slcd ra
r rspds hw hy prcvd
hr curr wrk sua, as wll as hw
hy prcvd hr dal wrk sua.
th rsarch prjc as wr
plad, parcpa slcd ad
questionnairesdistributedtoindividualplys durg pr-arragd
gahrgs sa (.g. dparal
gs, rag ssss ad Gm
brfgs). A h d h daa
cllc prd a ach prpry
(cpld July 2010), a al
914usablequestionnaireshadbeen
cpld. r h purps h yps
sascal ss w ar s rsd
, hs ubr, ad h brakdws by
graal grup, rprs a vald
sapl.
3.1 samPLe characteristics
gur 3 prss h brakdw
rspds by dusry scr h
ajry ar r hls, wh a hrd
r rsauras ad h radr r
h club scr.
Rsarchdsg ad
hds
24 Our commitment to the participating organisations was that none of the data would be identiable to any
particular organisation, and that we would not publish the names o participating organisations.25 This scale is known as a Likert Scale which has been ound, over decades o research and testing, to be a
highly eective way o measuring and capturing the dierences in, and range o, employee attitudes.
iGure 3: resPondents BY
industrY sector
Hl Club Rsaura
32% 55%
13%
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
23/56
21An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
gur 4 shws h graal
grupgs h survy rspds. A
ajry h rspds wr rh G Y ag brack (.. currly
agd bw 17 ad 31 yars
age),whichreectsthetraditional
dusry rlac yugr wrkrs.
th rag 344 rspds wr
classfd as -G Y, whch 140
ca b spcfcally dfd as G x
(.. agd bw 32 ad 45 a h
h sudy) ad 91 ca b dfd as
Baby Brs (.. agd bw 46
ad 65 a h h sudy)26.
As dcad gur 5 h sapl s
sly al, whch s als dcav h ypcal hspaly labur rc.
urhr characrscs h sapl ar
prsd h llwg fgurs. ths
characrscs wr als capurd by
thequestionnaireastheywerethought
pssbly hav a pac ply
auds ad valus, vr ad abv h
pac h graal chr.
As ca b s gur 6, r ha
50% h sapl has ly cpld
s lvl scdary duca. ths
fdg s surprsg hwvr, gvh larg rprsa yugr
rspds h sapl, ay
wh wuld b cug hr
schlg whls wrkg.
iGure 5: Gender oresPondents
mal al
41%
59%
26 The initial round of completed questionnaires did not distinguish between Gen X and Baby Boomers
and thereore the sample includes some participants who can only be distinguished as not Gen Y.
34%30%
15%
6%12% 3%
iGure 6: hiGhest LeveL o education comPLeted
G Y G x
Baby Brs n-G Y
12%
10%
15% 63%
iGure 4: resPondents BYGenerationaL GrouP
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
24/56
th ur h sapl s rlavly
rally dsrbud (gur 7), wh jus
udr a hrd bg h frs yar ply, arly hal h sapl
havg wrkd r hr rgasa
bw ad fv yars ad arud
wy prc havg wrkd wh hr
rgasa r r ha 5 yars.
th sapl cas a larg prpr
d ad Bvrag plys
(63 prc), wh Huskpg ad
FrontOfce/Conciergerepresenting
appraly 22 prc h sapl.
th ajry rspds hld -
suprvsry pss (s gur 8).
i s rsg , hwvr, ha
rs ply saus (
gur 9), ull- plys ar s
rprsd hs sapl, abv
casual ad par- plys.
Alhugh hr s a radal rlac
ras ad -pra
wrkrs h hspaly dusry, h
characteristicsofthissamplereectthe
parcpag rgasas phass
prvdg ull-, rlabl ad
prgrssv pss rdr prv
va ad cba ply
urvr.
22 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
iGure 8: Positions heLd
BY resPondents
Non-supervisorySupervisor/Manager
32%
68%
iGure 9: emPLoYment status
o resPondents
Casual Par- ull-
21%
36%
43%
iGure 7: tenure o resPondents
47%
22%31%
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
25/56
23An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
26/56
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
27/56
25An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
th rsuls ar prsd h
llwg rdr27:
1. a p
(y ply ):
ofGenYagainstthecombined
hrs (-G Y)28(4.1.1);
withintheGenYgroup(1st
wav, 2d wav, 3rd wav)
(4.1.2).
2. a p y
:
GenYvs.nonGenY(4.2.1);
thethreeGenYwaves(4.2.2).
3. a p l by:
industrysector(club,hotel,
restaurant)(4.3.1); tenure(lengthoftimean
ply has b wrkg
forthesamecompany)(4.3.2);
position(supervisorvs.non
supervisor)(4.3.3);
employmentstatus(fulltime,
par , casual) (4.3.4).
4.1 ratinGs o keY emPLoYee
indices
4.1.1 G Y n-G Y
ths sc prss h rsuls cral
h udrlyg as hs sudy: Hw
G Y s, r ay b dr, rs
wrkplac auds (rbrg
ha wrkplac auds hav a srg
inuenceonworkplacebehaviours,
parcularly wards cusrs ad c-
wrkrs). gur 11 shws h d rc
a auds r ach h ky
ply dcs r bh grups, ad
h ky fdgs ar hghlghd blw.
iGure 11: keY emPLoYee indices: Gen Y vs. non-Gen Y
Gen Y rates Lowerthan non-Gen Y on
these attitudes
Engagement
Job Satisfaction
Organisational CitizenshipBehaviours
Organisational Commitment
Perceived Supervisor Support
Perceived OrganisationalSupport
Perceived Fairness
Perceived Job Security
Rewards
Gen Y rateshiGher than non-
Gen Y on theseattitudes
Perceived Employability
Quit Intentions
Job Switching Behaviours
Inuence Of Co-WorkerPerformance
27 Statistical analyses were perormed using the sotware package SPSS a wealth o supporting statistical inormation has
been generated that will not be reported here. Statistical tests included independent samples t-tests, one-way analysis o
variance, and factorial design analysis of variance. Please contact the researchers should you require more in-depth information.28 As the focus of this report is on Gen Ys work-related attitudes, the Baby Boomer and Gen X groups have been combined into
one group named non-Gen Y. This aids the presentation of results and ndings as it focuses attention on Gen Ys attitudes.
n-G Y G Y
sgy digee sgy agee
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
28/56
26 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
4.1.2 G Y 1, 2 3 w
t vsga whhr h auds rky ply dcs ar slar acrss
h gra, w brk hs gra
dw sgs whch w calld
wavs:
1. 1s wav (h lds, agd bw
27and31atthetimeofthesurvey);
2. 2d wav (h d grup, agd
bw 22 ad 26 a h h
survey);
3. 3rd wav (h yugs grup ad
sll rlavly w h wrkrc,
agd bw 17 ad 21 a h h survy)
gur 12 shws h drc
auds (as) r ach h hr
wavs G Y.
i gral, w ud ha h ldr h
wav, h br h rag. S h 1s
wav (lds) grally has h hghs
rags, llwd by h 2d ad h
3rd. th rvrs s als ru h 3rd
iGure 12: keY emPLoYee indices BY Gen Y wave
the younger
the employee, themore difcult it is to
generate attitudes
linked with positive
organisational
outcomes, and the
more likely they are
to quit unexpectedlyor perorm poorly.
1s Wav 2d Wav 3rd Wav
Photo courtesy of Mirvac
Hotels and Resorts
sgy digee sgy agee
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
29/56
27An exAminAtion o work attitude differences
(yugs) wav has a hghr rag
r h auds whr s dsrabl
hav lw scrs, whl h 1s wav
grally ras h lws u h
hr wavs.
ths suggss ha h yugr h
ply, h r dfcul s gra auds lkd wh psv
rgasaal ucs, ad h r
lkly hy ar qu upcdly r
prr prly. ths fdg was frs
rvald h aalyss G Y vrsus
-G Y, ad urhr supprd h
aalyss h hr G Y wavs.
4.2 iMPortance of keY
eMPLoYee indices
th aalyss s ar has csdrd
h auds hspaly plys Quslad wh hy csdr
hr curr wrk rgasa. W
als askd rspds prvd
a rag prac ach h
dcs rdr br udrsad
hw ach grup valus ach d
h wrkplac. th prac (valu)
ha plys aach ach d s
aalysd rs G Y ad -
G Y, as wll as h hr wavs
G Y.
4.2.1 G Y n-G Y
gur 13 llusras h prac
ach ply d G Y ad -
G Y rspds.
All plys, rgardlss gra,
csdr s pra bsasfd wh hr jbs. llwg hs,
Jb Scury ad Rwards ar rad
as s pra by all rspds.
n-G Y rspds ra s
dcs as r pra ha G
Y rspds, alhugh G Y
plys plac a grar valu
rcg ha -G Y plys.
th bggs drc bw h
rags G Y ad -G Y
rspds was r h orgasaal
C d G Y plys
ra h prac hs d uch
lwr ha -G Y rspds.
Gen Y employees
place a greater
value on recognition
than non-Gen Y
employees.
fiGure 13: iMPortance of keY indices: Gen Y vs. non-Gen Y
n-G Y G Y
Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree
All employees,
regardless o
generation,consider it most
important to be
satisfed with
their jobs.
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
30/56
28 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
4.2.2 G Y 1, 2 3 w
gur 14 shws h drcs
bw rags prac r
ach ply d acrss h
hr wavs G Y plys.
Aga, Jb Sasac, Jb Scury
ad Rwards ar rad as h s
pra by hs rspds. Aga,
h yugr plys csdr all
h dcs b lss pra ha
h ldr plys. r apl,
ha h ldr plys s
valu c h rgasa,
rcg, suprvsry suppr
(ad hrs) hghr ha h yugr
plys. i s pssbl h, ha G
Ys auds wll prv wh . igh b ha G Y sruggls l
crabl h wrkplac ally,
bu as hy ga prc, hy
als prcv hgs r avurably.
Whhr hs s as a rsul havg
moreinuenceontheirworkplaceor
bcaus hr valus hav chagd vr
, ca b drd r hs
rsarch dsg. Rgardlss, a
ds b pad prvg h
prcps h yugs ad ws
wrkrs daly, ad wa r
h wrk u r hslvs.
iGure 14: imPortance o keY indices BY Gen Y wave
1s Wav 2d Wav 3rd Wav
sgy digee sgy agee
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
31/56
29An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
4.3 other inLuences on
keY emPLoYee indices
thr ar a hs rlva acrs
thatcouldinuenceanemployees
wrk-rlad auds ad valus, vr
ad abv h c graal
grupg. i s pssbl crl
r all such varabls h sudy,
s a w ky acrs wr slcd as
potentiallysignicantinuencesonthe
sapl grups auds.
Gv ha h survyd plys,
r h s par, hav dcad
hr auds wards hr curr
wrk sua, s pssbl ha
industrysectorhasaninuenceonthe
rspss. Dr wrk cds
prval ach dusry scr, ad s
lgcal assu ha hs gh hav a
inuenceonattitudes.
Lgh sp wh h rgasa
(ur), ps wh h rgasa
ad ply saus culd als
inuencethewayemployeesperceive
hr wrkg vr. each hs
acrs wll w b csdrd rs
ach h ky ply dcs.
4.3.1 d by iy s
gur 15 shws h drcs bw
h rags ach ky ply
d acrss ach dusry scr:
hls, rsauras ad clubs acrss all
graal grupgs. ipra fdgs
ar hghlghd h sdbar rgh.
W h ad h cbd
inuenceofindustrysectorand
graal grupg ply
auds. i hs aalyss, w cpard
h auds G Y plys acrss
dr dusry scrs, dr
hr ay subsaal drcs
sd. i h club scr, w ud ha
h prcps orgasaal ad
Suprvsry suppr ar ly lwrr G Y plys ha -G Y
plys, w als ud ha hy ar
sgfcaly lwr ha h prcps
G Y plys hr dusry
scrs. ths dcas w aras r club
aagrs cus rdr prv
hr aag G Y plys.
r G Y plys hls, w ud
ha h orgasaal C ad
orgasaal Czshp Bhavurs
dcs ar sgfcaly srgr ha G
Y plys h club ad rsaura
scrs. thr ay b apls bs
pracc srags plac hls ha
rsaura ad club aagrs culd
adap su hr w pras.
restaurant emPLoYees
rate Lower on:
orgasaal CRwards
hoteL emPLoYees
rate hiGher on:
orgasaal C
Jb Scury
Suprvsr Suppr
orgasaal Suppr
eplyably
Rwards
cLuB emPLoYees
rate Lower on:
Jb Scury
Suprvsr Suppr
Rsaura Club Hl
iGure 15: keY emPLoYee indices BY industrY sector
sgy digee sgy agee
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
32/56
30 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
Lg md early
4.3.2 d by Lg
eply (t)
gur 16 prss h drcs
as h ky ply dcs
acrss hr ur grupgs: arly
ur (lss ha 1 yar) d-ur (1
5 yars) ad lg ur (5+ yars).
majr drcs ar hghlghd h
sdbar l.
Wh akg accu h cbd
inuenceoftenureandgenerational
grupg, w ud abl cs
h dcs Jb Scury ad Jb
Swchg Bhavurs. n surprsgly,
fdg was ha G Y plys
wll hav grar lgs jb scury
a lar sags ur. o h hr
had, G Y plys arlr sags
ur, wll b r lkly swch
jbs upcdly (ha plys wh
ar G Y bu arly ur, r -
G Y plys wh ar arly ur).
earLY-tenure emPLoYees
rate Lower on:
egagJb Scury
rate hiGher on:
C-wrkr Prrac
Jb Swchg Bhavurs
Qu is
mid-tenure emPLoYees
rate Lower on:
Jb Sasac
Rwards
arss
LonG-tenure emPLoYees
rate hiGher on:
egag
orgasaal C
Czshp Bhavurs
Jb Scury
rate Lower on:
C-wrkr Prrac
Jb Swchg Bhavurs
Qu is
Gen Y
employees, inearlier stages
o tenure, will
be more likely
to switch jobs
unexpectedly.
iGure 16: keY emPLoYee indices BY tenure
sgy digee sgy agee
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
33/56
31An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
Supervisor/ManagerNon-supervisory
non-suPervisorY
emPLoYees
rate Lower on:egag
orgasaal C
Czshp Bhavurs
trag & Dvlp
opprus
Prcvd Suprvsry Suppr
Prcvd orgasaal Suppr
Jb Scury
suPervisors/manaGers
rate Lower on:C-wrkr Prrac
Jb Swchg Bhavurs
Qu is
4.3.3 d b
spy n-
spy eply
gur 17 shws h drcs
as ach h ky ply
dcs r -suprvsry plys
andforsupervisors/managers.A
ubr pra drcs
appard, whch ar hghlghd h
sdbar rgh.
Aga, w ad h cbd
inuenceofpositionandgenerational
grupg ply auds. W
ud ha h dcs egag,
Prcvd orgasaal Suppr ad
Prcvd Jb Scury wr s
inuencedbypositionandgenerational
grupg, wh hs w acrs wr
csdrd ghr. G Y plys
ar lss gagd grally. Wh hy
ar suprvsry pss, hs
prbl s cpudd. th sa
hlds r bh orgasaal Suppr
ad Jb Scury.
Gen Y employees
are less engagedgenerally, and
when they are in
non-supervisory
positions, this
problem is
compounded
iGure 17: keY emPLoYee indices BY Position
sgy digee sgy agee
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
34/56
32 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
ull- Par- Casual
casuaL emPLoYees
rate hiGher on:
C-wrkr Prrac
Jb Swchg Bhavurs
Qu is
Part-time and uLL-time
emPLoYees
rate hiGher on:
egag
Czshp Bhavurs
Jb Scury
orgasaal Suppr
Suprvsry Suppr
4.3.4 d by eply
s
gur 18 prss h drcs
as ach h ky ply
dcs r ach yp ply
saus: casual, par- ad ull-.
ipra drcs bw h
grups ar hghlghd h sdbar
h l.
Whl casual plys ar sgfcaly
lss gagd ha par- r ull-
plys, hr rag jb
sasac s hghr ha bh h
hr grups. ths fdg lds wgh
h argu ad arlr ha a
employeecanbequitesatisedwith
hr jb, bu pssss h dsrd
levelsofengagementknowntoinuence
ply bhavurs.
W als ad h cbd
inuenceofemploymentstatusand
graal grupg. th dcs
trag & Dvlp opprus,
Jb Scury, Rwards, C-wrkr
Prrac ad Czshp Bhavurs
wr s acd by ply
saus ad graal grupg, wh
hs w acrs wr csdrd
ghr. i shr, hs auds ar
prvd G Y plys wh
hy ar par- pss, ad v
r s ull- pss.
Havg prsd h rsuls h daa
cllc, w wll w hghlgh wha w
s as h t ms ipra dgs
r h survy hspaly plys.
iGure 18: keY emPLoYee indices BY emPLoYment status
sgy digee sgy agee
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
35/56
4.4 ten keY indinGs rom the surveY o hosPitaLitY emPLoYees
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10G Y ply -py l gly Less
enGaGed py Gen Y ply.
Lg- ply ll l more
avouraBLY l ply.
hl ply glly l more avouraBLY
lb ply.
G Y ply, plly ly ply , more LikeLY
b ply.
G Y ply pl Lower l bg plly
g.
G Y ply pl g l recoGnition
-G Y ply.
aLL ply pl g l joB satisaction,
ll by rewards joB securitY.
w G Y gp, yg Less avouraBLe
g l .
o ll l b, G Y
hiGher.
o g b, G Y glly
Lower.
33An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
36/56
34 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
5
hply ply l
b
g , y
ply ll
p b
l. a ,
ply ll
y y l by
g. i y, l
g
p b bl
.
i s val h, ha hspaly
bussss, rgardlss sz r
dusry scr, sablsh cv
hua rsurc aag
srags ha acla h dlvry
ofhighlevelsofservicequality.The
ply dcs cludd hs sudy
ar asurs varus aspcs h
ral ucg a rgasa
aspcs ha hav b lkd
pra busss ucs such as
crasd prfs, cusr r,
psv wrd--uh ad lwr sa
urvr.
th s abl brad fdg rhs sudy was ha h G Y ply
grup grally ras hs ply
dcs ha a rgasa shuld
b apg as as lwr
ha hr -G Y curpars.
Crrspdgly, h auds ad
bhavurs ha a rgasa wuld
wa s arstronger h G
Y grup plys.
i add hs, a aalyss wh h
G Y ply grup dsras
ha hr ar sascally sgfca
drcs p wh hs
chr. Grally spakg, h
yugs G Y plys (h 3rd
wav) ra wha s happg h
hr rgasa sgfcaly lwr
ha hr ldr G Y curpars.ths suggss ha h yugr h
ply, h r challgg s
psvly ac h crcal auds ha
ar lkd wh psv rgasaal
ucs.
ths fdgs hghlgh h prac
akg a gd frs prss
w plys, parcularly wh hy
ar hr frs jb. ths da s urhr
supprd by cparg h rsuls
plys dr ply
ur. o h whl, h plys
arly ur ra hr curr
wrkplac prcs sgfcaly lss
avurably ha d hr lg-urd
curpars.
These fndings
highlight the
importance o
making a good
frst impression onnew employees,
particularly when
they are in their
frst job.
th -bardg w plys
ad succssul scalsa hr
w rgasa ad wrkplac, s a
crrs lg-r r
sa. th ra prcss s crucal
r all plys, rgardlss hr
Dscuss rsuls
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
37/56
35An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
graal grupg. th fdgs
hs sudy shw ha wh w
plys ar als yug G Y sa,hs prcss s all h r challgg
g rgh.
tha s say ha plys
hr d- ad lg-ur shuld
b rg! ths sudy ud ha
d-ur plys had h lws
lvls jb sasac h hr
ur grupgs, as wll as h lws
prcps rwards ad arss.
ogg ply dvlp ad
suppr srags ar pra s
ha lgr-r sa ar ak r
grad r rg. Apg
as h ur plys s
a bvusly sud bjcv r ay
busss. Hwvr, whl h bf
lwr urvr s usually prssd
rs rducd css h shr-
r, wha bcs appar r
hs sudy s ha crasg h lgh
ply ur has advaags
rs prvd ply auds,
ad hrr, psv busss
prrac h lg-r.
ths sudy als ud ha all hdcs, Jb Sasac s s
pra plys, rgardlss
graal grupg r hr varabls.
llwg hs, was grally ud
ha Jb Scury ad Rwards ar h
pra acrs r plys.
All plys, rgardlss hr
gra, plac a hgh valu
bg sasfd wh hr jb, lg
scur ad bg wll rwardd r
dg .
o curs s pssbl kw
whhr h Jb Scury fdg s
partinuencedbytheGlobalFinancial
Crss (GC). Br h GC, G Y
had vr prcd s facal
hardshp, ad hs had b suggsd
by ay as h rass r
h radcal drcs hr wrk-
rlad auds. i a cus grup ru
by h rsarchrs a h bgg
hs rsarch prjc (jus prr
h 2008 sck-ark crash), a 18
yar ld apprc ch, wh acd
withthequestionwhatwillyoudoifyoucantndajob?,simplycouldnot
cprhd wha sh was bg askd.
th rsuls h curr sudy suggs
ha G Y plac a hghr valu
bg scur hr jbs ha has b
suggsd acdally.
turg h prac rwards,
s als rsg ha plys
ra hs h p hr s pra
dcs. i cras, wh ag
wha h plys acually prcv
as happg hr curr wrkplac,
h Rwards d has h lws ragu all h crcal ply asurs.
thr s bvusly a gap bw wha
plys wa ad wha hy ar
rcvg.
ths sudy als ud ha G Y
plys plac a hghr valu
bg rcgsd r hr wrk ha d
-G Y plys. Rcg was
h ly d ha G Y rspds
rad as r pra ha -G
Y rspds. o h c
dscrps G Y h ppular
da s ha hy d csa
rcg hr crbu h
wrk, v r asks ha ay s
uda ad rval. th fdgs
hs sudy ay ld s wgh hs
argu.
By grag h fdgs r ach
phas h G Y rsarch prjc
(lraur rvw, cus grups ad
survy), w ar abl cpar
h aur wrkplacs ha Baby
Brs, G x, ad G Y pcd
as ach rd h wrkrc. th ky
l vs, da characrscs ad
prrrd aag syls r ach
gra ar suarsd gur 19.
ths suary s dd as a gud
r hw cc ach gra,
bu rahr, prvd a udrsadg
ad pahy r h prcs ad
pcas ha dr ag grups
ay brg h wrkplac. As scy
has vlvd, s hav wrkplacs
ad h pca h wrkrs
h. Yu wll prbably fd ha s
h G Y apprachs dcad ursummarywillbeequallyaseffectivefor
Baby Br ad G x plys.
t wrap up h dscuss h
sudy rsuls, shuld b d ha
all plys ar dvduals wh
hr w prsals. n w ar
vr gg b alk. Whl ca b
usul dscvr rds auds
ad ps acrss grups ppl,
such as graal chrs, hr ar
manyotherfactorsthatcaninuence
wrk-rlad auds ad valus. As
has b dsrad hr, ur,
ps ad ply saus
inuenceattitudes,beforeweeven
There is obviously a gap between what
employees want and what they are receiving.
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
38/56
36 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
bg csdr a rag hr
inuencessuchasculturalbackground,
aly sz, ad prsaly ras.
Theconsequenceofthisforhospitality
bussss s ha, r pal busss
ucs, all plys us b
csdrd as dvduals. thr s
blak apprach aagg all
hua rsurcs. A paralll h
dvlp arkg ca b
draw hr. th v away r ass
prduc ass cussa s
ha s dd r h aag
hua rsurcs.
ths s gg a fgurg u whavas ach ad vry ply,
G Y r . i s a ar wha
vas yu wll va h, r
v wha yu hk wll va h.
Suprvsrs wll cssarly bc
r ad r gral h hua
rsurc aag prcss, as
therstandmostfrequentpointof
ply cac. Accrdgly, hy
wll d h apprpra sklls ad
kwldg cvly aag h
ply rlashp.
ths dscuss has shd s lgh hw h ky fdgs r hs survy
gh pac h aag
hua rsurcs hspaly
bussss. Bu wha ca aagrs
andownersdoaboutallofthis?The
sc wll prs s praccal
suggss ha ca prv h
ply rlashp bw
hspaly bussss ad hr G Y
plys.
iGure 19: comParison o characteristics: Gen Y, Gen x and BaBY Boomers 30
boomErs
b 1945 - 1964
GEnEratIon x
b 1965 - 1978
GEnEratIon Y
b 1979 - 1994
ie ie
ee
Post-war prosperity
Largest generation
Globalisation
Downsizing
Technology boom
Prosperity / uncertainty
Violence / terrorism
Skills shortages
ve Work ethic
Loyalty
Hierarchy
Achievement
Independence
Equity
Ownership / involvement
Individuality
Social responsibility
mii
Financial security
Responsibility
Career progression
Opportunity
Job variety
Creativity
Ip
qiie
Social skills Technology skills
Education
IQ / inquisitive
Networking / tolerance
Multitasking
Piy ig i Technology skil ls Socia l / networking skil ls Interpersonal / sot skills
Direction / ocus
Ifee e
ee ie
Parents
Authorities
Career advisors
Experts
Parents
Internet
Peers / social networks
spe ee
peepi
ie
Tradition
Reputation
Observation
Recommendation
Perception
Experience
key gee
Recruiting
Supervising
Training
Promoting
Innovating
Empowering
key
ii
Technical data
Evidence
Visual examples
Demonstrations
Hands-on learning
Participation
typi iig
ye
Formal
Monologue
Programmed
Dialogue
Interactive
Multi-ormat
typi eeip
ye
Control
Thinkers
Coordination
Doers
Consensus
Feelers
Ifee
e
Local
Long-term needs
Regional
Medium-term goals
Global
Short-term wants
mgee
pp
Telling
Yes boss
Selling
Whats in it or me?
Involving
Heres what I think
All employees, regardless o their generation,
place a high value on being satisfed with
their job, eeling secure in it and being well
rewarded or doing it.
30 Adapted by the researchers from the ndings of this project and a combination
o other sources, including Downing (2006) ; Eisner (2005) and QAS A (n.d.).
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
39/56
37An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences 37An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
40/56
38 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
6
iplcasr h
hspalydusry
Gen Y needs to be seen as a management
opportunity rather than a challenge. They
are, ater all, the leaders o the uture.
w p p
G Y ply l b
g ppy llg. ty ,
ll, l .
Ladg rgasas arud h
wrld dy challgs ad cra
srags ad acs whch ur
hs challgs val cpv
advaag. Accrdgly, w suggs
ha hr ar hua rsurc
srags ha ay hspaly busss
ca alr hr parcular pras
ad ply bas ha ca prduc
psv ucs r h busss,
whhr rs crasd rvus
ad prfs, hghr prducvy,
prvd cusr r, r
dcrasd sa urvr.
Basd h varus phass h
G Y rsarch prjc, cludg a
sv rvw rad ad acadc
publcas, a srs cus grups
withhospitalityemployeesandowners/
aagrs ad a larg-scal survy
hspaly plys Quslad,
w hav draw s ccluss abu
bs pracc h aag G Y hspal y plys. W
prs ur ccluss h r
Ten Recommendations or Managing
Gen Y. ths suggss d
cssarly all crrspd drcly
h fdgs h prvus sc,
bu rahr, r a hlsc aalyss
all ra ad daa surcd
hrughu h rsarch prjc.
6.1 ten recommendations or
manaGinG Gen Y
1. Get it riGht, riGht rom
the start
Prhaps r pra ha vr s
surg ha yu hr wll. Ad hs s
ly bcaus h agbl ad
agbl css urvr, bu rahr
bcaus h prac G Y
placs c-wrkr rlashps advalu alg wh hr plyr.
Rcru ad slc s ad
hocinthehospitalityindustry.Frequently
s d by l aagrs wh ll r
rag h cssary kwldg,
sklls ad arbus cssary r hs
ask). Y hr s dub ha cv
HRm praccs (parcularly rcru
ad slc) d happ by
accd! Br rcrug ad hrg,
csdr h valus h pal
rcru, G Y r hrws, ad hw h
prs wll f wh h rgasa. t, rcrurs cus a caddas
curr lvl sklls ad kwldg,
rahr ha h bggr pcur
h dvdual, wha hy blv ad
hr gral dsps wrk ad
l. Capals r r h
Photo courtesy of Mirvac
Hotels and Resorts
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
41/56
39An exAminAtion o work attitude dierences
ay ls avalabl hs days, such
asbehaviouralinterviewingtechniques.
ths ca allw yu srk h prcbalac bw sklls dd r a
parcular rl, ghr wh a bld
valus bw h prspcv
ply ad h rgasa. Hrg
s always pra, bu w blv ha
cvly aag G Y, s v
r pra.
oc hrd, h prs wh rgh
valus ad h rgh ra r yur
busss ca dvlp h spcfc sklls
ha ar cssary b ully cp
h apprpra rl. i a rcprcal
prcss, wh a busss prvds
dvlp ad larg pprus
r h w G Y ply, hy wll
lkly rspd kd wh c
h rgasa ad psv
cusr-rd bhavurs. r
G Y rcrus, ds sp hr,
as hy d gg prrac
apprasals ad rcg ( jus
aually!).
llwg carul rcru prcsss,
h ra ad scalsa w
plys s crucal. Dvlpg hkds psv auds ha lad
pra busss ucs s r
challgg arly ur plys,
parcularly hy ar G Y, s carul
a us b pad h a hs
sag. Rgular llw-ups chck
prgrss ad prvd dback wll b
psvly rcvd by G Y plys.
D lav s wks (r wrs sll,
ll h 3 h prba prd s up!)
fd u hw yur w ply s
fg say uch wh h a
wkly, v daly, bass (clvr us
chlgy ca b hlpul hr).
2. Get enGaGed! emPLoYee
enGaGement is essentiaL
eply gag has b
shw b h s pra
drvrs psv busss ucs.
Bchark glbal hspaly cpas
cla b abl prdc chags
h prag prrac dvdual
busss us basd chags h
lvl ply gag!
egagg h G Y ply s abu
vlvg h hw ad why h
busss pras, rahr ha jus
llwg a s srucs whuaskingquestions.Onewaytodo
hs s gvallyur plys h
ppruy prc yur busss
as a cusr wuld, s hy rally ca
pu hslvs h cusrs shs.
r h G Y ply, hs wll b
parcularly pra. may h wll
cssarly hav vr prcd
h yp hspaly pras yu
ar rug r hperspective o a
customer. may h larg hl chas
alrady r hr plys a r gh
-hus. Rsauras ad clubs, sad rg a r sa dscu, shuld
csdr rg r r sgfcaly
dscud dg pprus
hr sa. ths s shg haany
busss ca d, rgardlss sz r
dusry scr s a larg cs
ad h rurs ar asurabl.
Ahr way cras h lvl
gag yur G Y sa s
rally shw ha yu valu hr
pu. Acvly sk hr dback
praal prcsss ad cusr
srvc ssus. o curs, yu wll
vr b abl ac vryhg
hy suggs, bu wh a asphr
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
42/56
40 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
p dalgu, yu wll b abl
pla why yu gh b abl
cu parcular suggss. As aaddd bf, vry w ad h, yu
wll g a g a da (r r!) ha
wll r-shap yur busss ad s prf
args r h br.
W ca phass ugh h
prac ply gag
r yur busss alrady h larg
hl cpas acvly asur hw
gagd hr plys ar a rgular
bass, ad aagrs ar rwardd,
par, h bass prvg hs
scrs. W wuld lk spd r
addrssg hs pc, bu s
byd h scp hs rpr. isad
w rr h radr a cll
bk ha s ly asy rad bu
als rly sghul eply
egag: tls r Aalyss, Pracc
ad Cpv Advaag31.
3. BuiLd a comPanY cuLture
that is nurturinG and
coLLaBorative
G Y placs gra valu rdshps,c-wrkr rlashps ad rus,
ad hy hrv wrkg ghr
achv gals. Ds yur busss
haveastatementofvalues?Establish
s yu d alrady hav ay! i
yur plys wr ayusly
survyd, wuld hy ss ha h
wrk vr was whch card
forthewellbeingoftheemployees?
th culur a rgasa h
vr (physcal, prcdural ad
scal) ha h ply prcs
whl a wrk plays a larg par
drg ply auds. Ds
yur cpays culur sd ssags
31 Macey, W.H., Schneider, B., Barbera, K.M. & Young, S.A.
(2009) . Employee engagement: Tools or analysis, practice, and
competitive advantage. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.40 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
43/56
41An exAminAtion o work attitude differences
Following careful recruitment,
the orientation and socialisation
of new employees is crucial.
32 Michelli, J. A. (2008) . The New Gold S tandard: 5 Leadership Principles for Creating a Legendary
Customer Experience Courtesy of the Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company. New York, McGraw-Hill.
yur plys ha hy ar valud
ad rspcd? i s hg say yu
valu ad rspc yur plys, buplcs ad acs ha ar algd
wh hs prcpls wll udr
such sas ad sd h pps
ssag h sa.
t curag ad suppr awrk,
r as ad bas s asurs
a prrac whrvr pssbl.
r sac, a cv sys culd
rward dvdual prrac (.g.
al sals pr hur) whl a h sa
prvdg cvs r h u
as a whl wh cusr sasac
args ar achvd. Always kw yur
cpays audal udrcurr
ad r G Y, h r ururg ad
cllabrav, h br.
Aga, a -dph dscuss
rgasaal culur s pssbl
hs rpr. Alhugh hr ar ay
sal s rgasaal culur
(s ably ha edgar Sch),
r rsd radrs w rcd
a r rlva ad praccal bk
r hspaly wrs ad aagrs
A nw Gld Sadard32
. thsbk as h phlsphs ad
srags h Rz-Carl hl
cpay ha hav b srual
h cra s wrld-rwd
cpay culur.
4. encourage opportunities
for learning and growth
through challenging
work
G Y placs hgh valu larg
ad dvlp. thy br asly ad
crav plyrs ha r prks such as
u rburs, sabbacals, ad
hr grwh ad rag pprus.
obvusly, hs ar hgs ha s
hspaly bussss (hr ha hvry larg ulaals) ca ard,
s cus wha yu ca d. ral
rag ad dvlp prgras
asd, hr ar rqu pprus
r larg ad grwh wh h
hspaly wrkplac ha g
grd. ms sasd hspaly
prssals ak hr w lvl
kwldg r grad. Ask yursl:
Wha busss acvs ca i vlv
y sa s ha hy ca lar ad
grw prssally? Udrsadg
par lvls, placg sck rdrs, larg
rad ad udrsad acal
fash rprs all hs sgly
uda asks ca b a wrld
larg r a prcd ply
ha hy gh hrws b
psd hr prary rl.
i wll als pay dvdds d a
hs apprasal yur rag budg.
Sall bu css vs
rag prgras wll pay lg-r
dvdds ly ply lyaly
bu als hr lvls c
ad gag. Rbr ha allgra hspaly cpas vr vw
rag as a gd s ly ps.
Rahr, rag ad sa dvlp
bc h urs dd r a
halhy ad susaabl wrkrc.
Lk r , G Y vws sl as
qual ldr plys. i hr ys,
hr crbu s jus as valuabl as
ay lss, rgardlss prvus
prc. thy wll s as ar
ha hy hav d a parcular ask
jus bcaus hy ar w (has rgh,
yur gg hav d a w
raal r wh has rv h
chwg gu r udr h abls!).
thy dslk bg hadd h gru
jbs, r jbs whch hy hav
pay hr dus. thy sk challggwrk rgh r h sar. oc
wrk cass b a challg, w
prcs ad larg pprus
wll d b ud. Pla ahad s
as b caugh ll-prpard. Ad
always rbr ha G Y s asly
dsracd! mulaskg s lk brahg
hs plys. Yull d b
h ball kp h vlvd, wh w
ad challgg asks, s ha hy d
ls rs.
5. do not to assume thatgen Y has had the same
home training as past
generations
Prhaps du hr rlac
chlgy, hs graal grup
ss b a b bhd ac-
-ac cuca sklls. Wha
usd b gd h rag s
cssarly ru r hs gra.
ths ssu s parcularly rlva r
havy ac--ac cac pss.
Rl play rag ad qupracc r srvc plys wh
ar gg b rgular cac wh
cusrs (spcally ldr cusrs)
s r cssary ha yu gh
hk! Cusr dssasac asd,
awkward ad barrassg racs
wh cusrs gh b ugh ur
a G Y ply hr jb. may
hs prcs ca b avdd
by gvg h ply r sgh
wha s ha ach cusr s
pcg.
Suprvsrs shuld b gv apprpra
rag ad suppr dvlp h sklls
cssary dal wh h rcacs
-
8/2/2019 Generation Y as Hospality Employees: An examination of work attitude differences
44/56
42 Generation Y AS HoSPitALitY inDUStRY emPLoYeeS
communicating with
your employees in their own
language will help to engage
your Gen Y employees.
33 Palrey, J., & Gasser, U. ( 2008). Born digital: Understanding
the rst generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.
aagg ppl. th ral
carr pah sppg up r
srvr suprvsr ha s c h dusry s cll r carr
prgrss, y lacks h
associatedtrainingrequiredinthe
w s cssary sklls. G Y
plys wll lk hr suprvsrs
forrolemodelsandwilloftenequate
(as cusrs d) h ra
hy rcv r h suprvsr as
cg r h rgasa. A pr
prc wh a prcd ad
urad suprvsr culd ls yu a
valud rl ply.
6. Get out o deniaL! use
technoLoGY to imProve
communication with
Your sta
is g u chlgy dal
ha hugh ha i jus gr , wll
g away! Ulk ay h hspaly
ld schl, G Y plys ak
lcrc cllabra r grad.
Whrvr pssbl, us a chlgcal
plar prvd cpay ra
ad rag duls plys - bu
ak sur wrks ad s slw ad
rusrag us. obvusly sz ad
rsurcs wll dr h
whch ra chlgy ca b
usd hac a busss, bu hr
ar ways ha sall cpas ca
br uls lcrc cuca
whu gra ps. tap h way
yur G Y plys cuca
wh ach hr. Ca pra s
r aucs b shrd f
intoacomputer-generatedSMS?Can
yu advrs days shs hrugh
acbk ssag all avalabl
employees?
Crag a scal da prsc ad
cucag wh yur plys
hr w laguag wll hlp gagyur G Y plys. Wh a ll
va, s pssbl wak hs
plars g h plys sar
buldg hyp abu yur busss
whch aus r advrsg.
Alhugh h sallr busss prars
radg hs gh hk byd
hr scp, h raly s ha scal
da ss ar a r srvc. t
adsrg such ss s bvusly a
ssu, bu hs ca b a rspsbly
yu gv a rusd ad agr G Y
ply.
i add hs cuca
plars, rvw yur plcs abu
usg bl chlgy a wrk
csdr lsg h ruls a b. r
yu, usg bl phs sd
ssags ad chckg acbk
whl a wrk s dsrspcul, bu
G Y, s par lvg. Csdr hs:
a survy h US ud ha a gra
ajry G Y plys wuld ak
a jb wh lss pay ha hr curr
allwd h grar us
bl dvcs whl a wrk. Scpas day allw a cra ubr
us pr day sur h ad
d alg, c. Alhugh hs ay
always f wh h cs rsras a
hospitalityoperation,reectonhowthis
ccp gh b adapd f yur
business.Allowingemployeestoquickly
chck ad rspd s hr
dw, wh rasabl budars
(hr ar da cusr
ds srv, c.), s as bcg a
cssary ccss ak rdr
kp G Y plys vad
ad cusd. i yur busss has a
brak r, pug a cpur hr
(nothingash,anoldoneoracheap
w ) s yur sa ca say uch
br hr sh ad hr braks wll
b wll rcvd.
thr ar ay rsg bks ad
arcls avalabl whch prvd sghs
h way chlgy s usd
cuca bh prsally ad
h wrkplac. As a gd apl, w
suggs Br Dgal: Udrsadg
h rs Gra Dgal navs33.
7. revitaLise Your oLd
recoGnition ProGrams
Bcaus h valu hy plac pras, gu wrk rcg
prgras ar wll rcvd by G
Y plys. eply rcg
ca ak ay rs ca b r
suprvsr ply (haks, gra
jb day, yu rally ar gg br a
aagg yur sc!), r pr-
-pr (plys ag hr
a brs r spcal rcg),
a-basd (rcg rvu,
prf r cusr sasac args
achvd by h a), r rgasa-
wd (publcsd awards r usadgprrac r dsra
cpay valus).
B crav wh yur rcg
schs wh G Y, h r
vav ad -h-wall h da,
h r lkly s va h.
Brg vary h way yur rcgs
plys vry wll b
vad prr h sa way,
s b prpard rcgs ppl r
dr als ad sklls.
tak c