Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication
-
Upload
lacota-preston -
Category
Documents
-
view
34 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication
![Page 1: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Andrey Alexeyenko
Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and
prognostication
![Page 2: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
“Data is not information, information is not knowledge,knowledge is not wisdom, wisdom is not truth,”
—Robert Royar (1994)
![Page 3: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
http://www.hdpaperz.com
Biological data production
…and analysis
![Page 4: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Primary molecular processes
Response, recorded with high-throughput
paltforms
Known biological units: processes, pathways
Protein abundance1. 2. 3. 4. …N.
Phosphorylation1. 2. 3. 4. …N.
Methylation1. 2. 3. 4. …N.
mRNA expression1. 2. 3. 4. …N.
ChipSeq1. 2. 3. 4. …N.
Mutation profile1. 2. 3. 4. …N.Metabolites
1. 2. 3. …N.
Pathway analysis: why needed, what it is?
![Page 5: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Cancer heterogeneity
Cancers of a primary site may represent a heterogeneous group of diseases of diverse molecular origin which vary with regard to
– oncogenic mutations that have initiated them, – protein landscape (abundance, functionality) that
maintains the disease progression, and thereby:– their responsiveness to specific drugs.
![Page 6: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
FunCoup is a data integration framework to discover
functional coupling in eukaryotic proteomes with
data from model organisms
Amouse
Bmouse
?F
ind
ort
hol
og
s*
Human
Fly
Rat
Yeast
Hig
h-th
roug
hput
ev
iden
ce
Andrey Alexeyenko and Erik L.L. Sonnhammer (2009) Global networks of functional coupling in eukaryotes from comprehensive data integration. Genome Research.
![Page 7: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
FunCoup: on-line interactome resource
Andrey Alexeyenko and Erik L.L. Sonnhammer (2009) Global networks of functional coupling in eukaryotes from comprehensive data integration. Genome Research.
http:
//Fu
nCou
p.sb
c.su
.se
![Page 8: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Do gene networks tell
any story?
• Yellow diamonds: somatic mutations in prostate cancer
• Pink crosses: also mutated in glioblastome (TCGA)
State-of-the-art method to beat:Frequency analysis of somatic mutations
![Page 9: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Network enrichment analysis:
Altered genes (green) from one individual lung cancer are enriched in network connections to members of ErbB (HER2) pathway (yellow) and GO term “apoptosis” (blue).
Question: How to find something in common between many altered genes?
![Page 10: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Apophenia: the human propensity to see meaningful patterns in random data
(Brugger 2001; Fyfe et al. 2008)
![Page 11: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Network enrichment analysis: compared to a reference and quantified
N links_real = 12
N links_expected = 4.65
Standard deviation = 1.84
Z = (N links_observed – N links_expected) / SD = 3.98
P-value = 0.0000344
FDR < 0.1
Actual network: observed pattern A random pattern
Question:Is ANXA2 related to TGFbeta signaling?
![Page 12: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Functional characterization of novel gene sets
Functional set?
Our alternative:Network enrichment analysis
Altered genes
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
No. of positives, random groups
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
No.
of p
ositi
ves,
rea
l gro
ups
GEA_SIGN GEA_REST NEA_SIGN NEA_REST
State-of-the-art method to beat:Gene set enrichment analysis
Alexeyenko A, Lee W, … Pawitan Y. Network enrichment analysis: extension of gene-set enrichment analysis to gene networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 2012
![Page 13: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Towards even better network predictionpartial correlations:
a way to get rid of spurious links
0.7
0.6
0.4
![Page 14: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Cancer-specific networks:links inferred from
expression, methylation, mutations
Functional couplingtranscription transcription transcription methylation methylation methylation mutation methylation mutation transcriptionmutation mutation
+ mutated gene
State-of-the-art method to beat:
Reverse engeneering froma single
source (usually transcriptome)
![Page 15: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
How informative is a global gene network?
![Page 16: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Now: answering biological questions
![Page 18: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Molecular phenotypes in network space(lung cancer, data from ChemoRes consortium)
P53 signaling
Cell cycle
Apoptosis0 2 4 6 8
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Years since surgery
Re
lap
se-f
ree
su
rviv
al
Predictors:
GO:0001666 response to hypoxiaGO:0005154 EGFR bindingGO:0005164 TNF bindingGO:0070848 response to growth factor stimulus
Question: How to distinguish between different molecular subtypes of cancer?
![Page 19: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Science 29 March 2013: Cancer Genome LandscapesBert Vogelstein, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Victor E. Velculescu, Shibin Zhou, Luis A. Diaz Jr., Kenneth W. Kinzler*
"Though all 20,000 protein-coding genes have been evaluated in the genome-wide sequencing studies of 3284 tumors, with a total of 294,881 mutations reported, only 125 Mut-driver genes, as defined by the 20/20 rule, have been discovered to date (table S2A). Of these, 71 are tumor suppressor genes and 54 are oncogenes. An important but relatively small fraction (29%) of these genes was discovered to be mutated through unbiased genome-wide sequencing; most of these genes had already been identified by previous, more directed investigations. “
“At best, methods based on mutation frequency can only prioritize genes for further analysis but cannot unambiguously identify driver genes that are mutated at relatively low frequencies”
![Page 20: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Is NTRK1 a driver in the GBM tumor TCGA-02-0014?
![Page 21: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Somatic mutations: drivers vs. passengersdata from The Cancer Genome Atlas
![Page 22: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Gains and losses on chromosome 7, in 142 glioblastoma multiforme genomes, TCGA
Driver copy number changesCopy number of MAP3K11
Altered Normal
Point mutation inPTEN
Present 6 (~2) 29 (~33)Absent 2 (~6) 105 (~102)
Cop
y nu
mbe
rC
onfid
ence
![Page 23: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Genetic association of sequence variants near AGER/NOTCH4 and dementia.Bennet AM, Reynolds CA, Eriksson UK, Hong MG, Blennow K, Gatz M, Alexeyenko A, Pedersen NL, Prince JA.J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;24(3):475-84.
Genome-wide pathway analysis implicates intracellular transmembrane protein transport in Alzheimer disease.Hong MG, Alexeyenko A, Lambert JC, Amouyel P, Prince JA.J Hum Genet. 2010 Oct;55(10):707-9. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
Analysis of lipid pathway genes indicates association of sequence variation near SREBF1/TOM1L2/ATPAF2 with dementia risk.Reynolds CA, Hong MG, Eriksson UK, Blennow K, Wiklund F, Johansson B, Malmberg B, Berg S, Alexeyenko A, Grönberg H, Gatz M, Pedersen NL, Prince JA.Hum Mol Genet. 2010 May 15;19(10):2068-78. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
Validation of candidate disease genes(work with Jonathan Prince, MEB, KI)
Question: Is there extra evidence for GWAS-candidates to be involved?Answer: Yes, for some…
![Page 24: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Resistance to vinorelbine in lung cancer: pathways
0 2 4 6 8
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
GO:0001666 response to hypoxia
Years since surgery
Rela
pse-f
ree s
urv
ival
0 2 4 6 8
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
GO:0005154 EGFR binding
Years since surgery
Rela
pse-f
ree s
urv
ival
0 2 4 6 8
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
GO:0005164 TNF binding
Years since surgery
Rela
pse-f
ree s
urv
ival
0 2 4 6 8
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
GO:0070848 response to growth factor stimulus
Years since surgery
Rela
pse-f
ree s
urv
ival
![Page 25: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Overlap between gene signatures of relapse
From Roepman et al., 2007
Usually the overlap between signatures is negligible. Because e.g.:• Different sub-types of patient population, • Different microarray platforms!
However the main reason is:
Dimensionality curse!
![Page 26: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Consistency of molecular landscape:raw genes or network-based pathway scores?
Gene expression
Gene expression => pathway scores
![Page 27: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Relapse
+ -
Treatment
+ A B
- C D
Resistance to vinorelbine in lung cancerT-R- T-R+ T+R- T+R+
-4-3
-2-1
01
23
MED
17
T-R- T-R+ T+R- T+R+
-6-5
-4-3
-2-1
0
AC
005921.3
T-R- T-R+ T+R- T+R+
-4-2
02
4
CD
C2L6
T-R- T-R+ T+R- T+R+
-3-2
-10
12
3
FN
BP4
T-R- T-R+ T+R- T+R+
-5-4
-3-2
-10
12
MED
4
T-R- T-R+ T+R- T+R+
-3-2
-10
12
TB
L1Y
T-R- T-R+ T+R- T+R+
-6-4
-20
2
CD
K8
T-R- T-R+ T+R- T+R+
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
CLPTM
1L
Question: What predicts tumor resistance to chemotherapy?Answer: Depletion of differential transcriptome towards few specific genes
![Page 28: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Resistance to vinorelbine in lung cancer
Functionally coherent genes associated with vinorelbine resistance. A. Network representation of the group. Magenta: genes associated with resistance in NEA and likely producing a protein complex (ranked 1, 3, 5, 6, 11, and 18) plus one more gene CLPTM1L (beyond the ranking but also significantly associated, was previously reported as related to cisplatin resistance); yellow: non-commonly expressed genes linked with the NEA genes and less represented in the susceptible tumors, hence most contributing to the association (see Results for more explanation).B. Box-plots of NEA scores for the genes colored magenta in A.
![Page 29: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Network analysis:how to succeed?
• Analyze prioritized candidates (from genotyping, DE, GWAS…) rather than any genes.
• Do not lean on single “interesting” network links. Employ statistics!i.e.
“concrete questions” => “testable hypotheses” => “concrete answers”
The amount of information in known gene networks is enormous.
Let’s just use it!
![Page 31: Gene interaction networks for functional analysis and prognostication](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070402/568138a5550346895da064a5/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Summary• Raw data production• Data accumulation globally• Ambitions• Need in data interpretation• Functional interpretation• Networks: in reality and as logical models• Significance: as important in bioinformatics as in “core” biology
– Risk of false discovery– Adjustment for multiple testing
• Enrichment analysis: pure gene sets and in the network• Biological questions to answer:
– Driver mutations– Other “driving” events (changed copy number, methylation, expression)– Association between a clinical feature and multiple genes at once