GE Succession Planning - A Case Study
-
Upload
manmohan-anand -
Category
Business
-
view
21.787 -
download
6
description
Transcript of GE Succession Planning - A Case Study
GENERAL ELECTRIC, NEW YORK
Case Study : Succession Planning at GE
M.S.Ramaiah Management Institute, Bangalore | MBA (PRIST-A) | HRM Case Study
Presented By : Team Members
Christ Biswasi Minz
Debarati Sen Gupta
Denny Singh
Kumar Shubham
Krishna Kumar
Kartikey Yamdagni
Kamal Nayan
Maneet Kumar
Manishankar Sonkushre
Man Mohan Anand
M.S.Ramaiah Management Institute, Bangalore | MBA PRIST(A) 2009-11
Succession Planning
Succession planning is a process for identifying and developing internal employees with the potential to fill critical organizational positions
It reduces risk
Create a proven leadership model
Smooth business continuity
Improve staff morale
It encourages “Hiring From Within”
Understand Development
Need
Identify Possible
Successor
Develop & Train
Successor
Promote & Compensate
Ready For Movement
Introduction : General Electric
Established in 1892, Thomas Alva Edison merged his EELC with Thomson-Houston Electric Company to form General Electric.
Business Structure of GE at a glance:
Forbes ranked GE as the world's largest company. The company has 323,000 employees around the world.
In Fortune Magazine's 2005 "Global Most Admired Companies" list, GE ranked first overall.
By June,2010 The Ecomagination Revenue of GE will reach upto $25 Billion
Commercial
Finance Energy Transportation
Health Care
Infrastructure
Case Study : Succession Chart at GE
Thomas Alva Edition (1892)
Charles Coffin (1894)
Gerard Swope (1922)
Charles Wilson (1940)
Ralph Cordiner (1950)
Fred Borch (1964)
Reginald Jones (1972)
Jack Welch (1981)
Jeff R Immelt (2001)
Case Study : Summary
Succession Planning Process at GE – The leading diversified business in the world
Growth of GE from inception and GE’s commitment to succession planning
It explains succession planning and leadership development at GE
It examine CEO’s succession planning under Jack Welch (GE’s CEO 1981-2001)
It shows differences between management style and ideologies of Immelt and Welch
Finally, the future of GE under the leadership of Immelt
Case Study : Discussion Session
Q:1(a)
Critically examine the importance of leadership development and succession planning at GE and explain how it is undertaken at the company?
A:1(a) Adopted Succession Planning from Mid-1900.
Movement of candidates across all its business
Focus on “Talent Differentiation”
Major Tools Used at GE for Differentiating Talent
Vitality Curves
9 Blocks
Accomplishment Analysis
Case Study : Discussion Session
Q:1(b)
Why do you think that involvement of the top leadership in the succession planning process is important?
A:1(b)
Advantages of involving the top management in the succession Planning:
Better Assessment Ability
Employees will be trained under experts
Personal attention to key candidates
Build a health relationship between top management and employees
Case Study : Discussion Session
Q:2(a)
Study and comment on the CEO succession planning process Welch followed.
A:2(a) In 1994, Welch created a list of essential qualities,
skills and characteristics an “Ideal CEO” should posses.
Submitted a list of 23 candidates to GE Board
Organized informal events to look at potential CEO candidates
By 1998, The original list narrowed down to 8 serious candidates.
Developed “Eight Basic Objective for Selecting CEO Successor”.
Case Study : Discussion Session
Q:2(a)
Do you think Welch was right in deciding against retaining final CEO candidate, who failed to make it to the job? Justify your answer.
A:2(a)
Yes, Welch was right.
Each candidate are equally enough to run GE
They could easily become CEOs of any leading company
Retaining candidates may results into personal as well as business conflicts
Work efficiency may reduce after retaining
Case Study : Discussion Session
Q:3(a)
Comment on the performance of GE under Immelt’s leadership.
A:3(a)
Immelt’s Performance at GE
Due to 9/11, GE failed to report double digit earning growth in the fiscal 2002
Measures opted by Immelt:
Cut costs through layoffs
Restructured GE business
Introduced a Customer Service program – ACFC
He focused on “Customer Centric” strategy.
Invested $100 million in R&D to form “Global Research Center”
Case Study : Discussion Session
Q:3(b)
Compare Welch’s and Immelt’s leadership styles and ideologies.
• Money making machine
• Focus on Acquisition • Focus more on Job Rotation • Focus on Short term demand
• Charismatic
Jack Welch
• Customer centric company
• Focus on Innovation • Retain managers to make them specialist
• Focus on Long term strategies • Natural Leader
Jeff.R.Immelt
Case Study : Discussion Session
Q:3(c)
Do you think Immelt is right in investing more in R&D and
innovation, rather than on acquisition? Give reason to support your answer.
A:3(c) Yes, He was right because in case of economic slowdown
the company need to make their own growth.
Growth opportunity through innovation helps in economy slowdown, rather than acquisitions
He spent $100 Millions to “Revamp House of Magic” (Global Research Lab)
New products/technology always attract customers more than existing one thus generates more revenue
Case Study : Discussion Session
Q:4(a) Examine the need for Succession Planning in Companies and
identify various problems a company might have to face due to lack of succession planning system.
A:4(a) Need for succession planning
To have a ready pool of deserving candidates to fill the leadership positions when need arises.
Opportunities for internal employees increases Build a healthy relationship between Top Management &
employees
Problems due to lack of succession planning Affect business performance and reputation Moral of the company’s staff is affected Severance pay, In case external employee is hired
Case Study : Discussion Session
Q:4(b)
Many companies appoint CEOs from outside, rather than from
within the company. Do you support this practice? Justify your answer, citing reasons.
A:4(b)
No, Reasons are explained below:
Non-Familiarity with OC
They don’t understand norms and rules of the company
Increases cost
Demotivate employees
Case Study : Conclusion
Preparing future leader
Building-up the performer
Creating healthy working environment
Overall cost saving.
Case Study : Bibliography
Websites:
http://www.google.co.in
http://www.icmrindia.org/
http://www.ge.com/in/
Books
Human Resource Management – V.S.P Rao
Case Study : Succession Planning At GE
Thank You