20 April 06 P5 - SLAC Global Design Effort 1 ILC Update from the GDE Barry Barish GDE Caltech.
GDE: Progress Report Barry Barish ILCSC Report CERN 9-Feb-06.
-
date post
22-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of GDE: Progress Report Barry Barish ILCSC Report CERN 9-Feb-06.
GDE: Progress Report
Barry BarishILCSC Report
CERN 9-Feb-06
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 2
Global Design Effort
– The Mission of the GDE • Produce a design for the ILC that includes a
detailed design concept, performance assessments, reliable international costing, an industrialization plan , siting analysis, as well as detector concepts and scope.
• Coordinate worldwide prioritized proposal driven R & D efforts (to demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc.)
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 3
The GDE after ~6 Months
• How have we done?– We are on track – BCD produced by end of 2005
as promised. It will provide a sound basis for entering into a reference design effort, globally coordinate R&D program, begin industrialization, determine costs, etc. next year
• What’s Next?– Undertaking Design/Cost effort toward Reference
Design Report (RDR)– Assessing present R&D program to begin to
provide global guidance in the future.
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 4
Baseline Configuration Document
• Our ‘Deliverable’ by the end of 2005
• A structured electronic document– Documentation (reports, drawings etc)– Technical specs.– Parameter tables
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 5
Structure of the BCD
Summary-like overview for those who want to understand the choice and the why
Technical documentation of the baseline, for engineers and acc. phys. making studies towards RDR
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 6
Alternatives Section(s)
Note ACD is part of the BCD
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 7
The Key Decisions
Critical choices: luminosity parameters & gradient
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 8
Making Choices – The Tradeoffs
Many decisions are interrelated and require input from several WG/GG groups
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 9
From Snowmass to a Baseline
August September October November December
2005Snowmass
WW/GG summaries
Response to list of 40+ decisions
All documented ‘recommendations available on ILC Website (request community feedback)
Review by BCD ECBCD EC publishes‘strawman’ BCD
PublicReview Frascati
GDE meeting
BCD Executive Committee:BarishDugan, Foster, Takasaki Raubenheimer, Yokoya, Walker
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 10
GDE Frascati – The BCD Approved
• December 2005
• Finished the BCD
• Organized the GDE and the broader R&D and Design efforts for next year
http://www.linearcollider.org/
BCD
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 11General Layout Plan 500 Gev
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 12
Next Goal – Reference Design
• Reorganized the GDE toward Design / Cost Effort • A global effort to design / cost the ILC is
underway and working• Configuration Control; International Costing;
Industrialization; Siting
--------------------------• A sound design must be established with
convincing and affordable costing. • Global R&D program to demonstrate the ILC,
improve over the baseline and reduce costs.
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 13
ICFA FALC
FALC Resource Board
ILCSC
GDEDirectorate
GDEExecutive Committee
GlobalR&D Program
RDR Design Matrix
GDER & D Board
GDEChange Control Board
GDEDesign Cost Board
GDE RDR / R&D Organization
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 14
ICFA FALC
FALC Resource Board
ILCSC
GDEDirectorate
GDEExecutive Committee
GlobalR&D Program
RDR Design Matrix
GDER & D Board
GDEChange Control Board
GDEDesign Cost Board
GDE RDR / R&D Organization
Reporting
resourcestechnical
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 15
ICFA FALC
FALC Resource Board
ILCSC
GDEDirectorate
GDEExecutive Committee
GlobalR&D Program
RDR Design Matrix
GDER & D Board
GDEChange Control Board
GDEDesign Cost Board
GDE RDR / R&D Organization
GDE
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 16
GDE MembersChris Adolphsen, SLACJean-Luc Baldy, CERNPhilip Bambade, LAL, OrsayBarry Barish, CaltechWilhelm Bialowons, DESYGrahame Blair, Royal HollowayJim Brau, University of OregonKarsten Buesser, DESYElizabeth Clements, FermilabMichael Danilov, ITEPJean-Pierre Delahaye, CERN, Gerald Dugan, Cornell UniversityAtsushi Enomoto, KEKBrian Foster, Oxford UniversityWarren Funk, JLABJie Gao, IHEPTerry Garvey, LAL-IN2P3Hitoshi Hayano, KEKTom Himel, SLACBob Kephart, FermilabEun San Kim, Pohang Acc LabHyoung Suk Kim, Kyungpook Nat’l UnivShane Koscielniak, TRIUMFVic Kuchler, FermilabLutz Lilje, DESY
Tom Markiewicz, SLACDavid Miller, Univ College of LondonShekhar Mishra, FermilabYouhei Morita, KEKAlex Mueller, LAL - OrsayHasan Padamsee, Cornell UniversityCarlo Pagani, DESYNan Phinney, SLACDieter Proch, DESYPantaleo Raimondi, INFNTor Raubenheimer, SLACFrancois Richard, LAL-IN2P3Perrine Royole-Degieux, GDE/LALKenji Saito, KEKDaniel Schulte, CERNTetsuo Shidara, KEKSasha Skrinsky, Budker InstituteFumihiko Takasaki, KEKLaurent Jean Tavian, CERNNobu Toge, KEKNick Walker, DESYAndy Wolski, LBLHitoshi Yamamoto, Tohoku UnivKaoru Yokoya, KEK
49 members
New MembersMarc Ross (SLAC)Bill Willis (Columbia)Andre Seryi (SLAC)John Sheppard (SLAC)Ewan Patterson (SLAC)Peter Garbincius (Fermilab)Maseo Kuriki (KEK)Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK)Nobuhiro Terunuma (KEK)Norihito Ohuchi (KEK)Susanna Guiducci (INFN)Deepa Angal-Kalinin (CCLRC)
TotalsAmericas 22Europe 23Asia 16
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 17
GDE Structure and Organization
• Executive Committee for Baseline Configuration– GDE Director
• Barish
– Regional Directors • Dugan – Americas • Foster – Europe• Takasaki – Asia
– Accelerator Leaders• Yokoya - Asia• Raubenheimer - Americas• Walker - Europe
• Responsible for decisions and documentation for the Baseline Configuration Document (BCD) and RDR
GDEExecutiveCommittee
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 18
GDE Structure and Organization
• GDE Groups– Design / Cost Engineers
• Shidara – Asia
• Bialowons – Europe
• Garbincius – Americas
– Siting, Civil Construction and Infrastructure• Baldy - Europe
• Enomoto – Asia
• Kuchler – Amercas
– Physics / Detectors (WWS chairs)• Brau - Americas
• Richard - Europe
• Yamamoto - Asia
– Accelerator Experts (44 GDE members)
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 19
GDE Organizational Evolution for RDR
• Selected additions to the GDE following the BCD completion having needed skills in design, engineering, costing, etc
• Change Control Board– The baseline will be put under configuration control and a
Board with a single chair will be created with needed expertise.
• Design / Cost Board– A GDE Board with single chair will be established to
coordinate the reference design effort, including coordinating the overall model for implementing the baseline ILC, coordinating the design tasks, costing, etc.
• R&D Board– A GDE Board will be created to evaluate, prioritize and
coordinate the R&D program in support of the baseline and alternatives with a single chair
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 20
Change Control Board (CCB) Nobu Toge (chair)
Markiewicz US
Mishra US
Funk US
Kubo Asia
Kuriki Asia
Pagani EU
Blair EU
Schulte EU
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 21
Design Cost Board (DCB) Peter Garbincius (chair)
Phinney US
Paterson US
Kephart US
Enomoto Asia
Shidara Asia
Terunuma Asia
Bialowons EU
Delahaye EU
Mueller EU
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 22
Global R&D Board (RDB) Bill Willis (chair)
Padamsee US
Himel US
Wolski US
Hayano Asia
Higo Asia
Elsen EU
Lilje EU
Garvey EU
Damerell EU
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 23
Approach to ILC R&D Program
• Proposal-driven R&D in support of the baseline design. – Technical developments, demonstration experiments,
industrialization, etc.
• Proposal-driven R&D in support of alternatives to the baseline– Proposals for potential improvements to the baseline,
resources required, time scale, etc.
• Develop a prioritized DETECTOR R&D program aimed at technical developments needed to reach combined design performance goals
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 24
ICFA FALC
FALC Resource Board
ILCSC
GDEDirectorate
GDEExecutive Committee
GlobalR&D Program
RDR Design Matrix
GDER & D Board
GDEChange Control Board
GDEDesign Cost Board
GDE RDR / R&D Organization
ILCDesignEffort
ILCR&D
Program
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 25
Request for
Sample Site Information
To be used to study siting issues, in advance of a call for “expressions of interest” to host the ILC
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 26
How and when to involve industry?
• Large Scale Project Characterization– Large Project Management– Precision Engineering– International Coordination– Costing
• Industrialization– Civil Construction & Infrastructure– Cryogenics– Superconducting RF structures, couplers, etc– Electronics and Control Systems– Large Scale Computing
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 27
From Baseline to a RDR
Jan July Dec
2006
Freeze ConfigurationOrganize for RDR
Bangalore
Review Design/Cost Methodology
Review InitialDesign / Cost Review Final
Design / CostRDR Document
Design and Costing ReleaseRDR
Frascati Vancouver Valencia
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 28
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 29
Program
Morning Afternoon Evening May 19 Arrival, registration Rest May 20 Introduction I & II Sources;
Bunch compressors Tutorial & homework
May 21 Damping ring basics Damping ring design Tutorial & homework May 22 ILC linac basics;
ILC linac beam dynamics Field trip to Kamakura Free time
May 23 High power RF; SRF basics
SRF cavity technology
Tutorial & homework
May 24 ILC cryomodule; Room-temperature RF
Beam delivery; Beam-beam interaction
Tutorial & homework
May 25 Instrumentation & feedback
Conventional facilities; Operations
Tutorial & homework
May 26 (*) Sokendai – KEK KEK tour Free time May 27 (*) Detectors;
Physics ATF; Site visit to ATF
Free time
May 28 Departure
• An 8-day program for a complete education in linear colliders
• 6 days of lectures on accelerators at Sokendai
• 2 days at KEK to see and touch the real thing
• Total of 21 lectures covering both basic and advanced accelerator topics
• Emphasis on ILC but also including CLIC
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 30
• All 21 lecturers confirmed• A team of first-class experts
in the field• Good mixture of young and
senior physicists• Good geographical
distribution in the three regions: Asia – America – Europe = 7–7–7
• Good balance among various institutions, including CERN, DESY, INFN, KEK, PAL, Tohoku Univ., SLAC, LBL, JLab and Fermilab
• Overwhelming responses from around the world
• No. of students to take: 80 • Applications received: 400 • Application deadline: Feb 15• A tough job to select students• Preference given to applicants
from HEP countries• A small number given to
exceptional applicants from non-HEP countries
• Selection based on applicant’s CV and one recommendation letter
Lecturers Students
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 31
• All students will receive financial aid for attending the school, including travel
• North America: A total of US$70k received from DOE, Fermilab and SLAC
for students and lecturers from North America• Asia:
Expecting US$70-80k (equiv.) from JSPS for students and lecturers from Asia
KEK to cover local expenses (meeting rooms, A/V, school supplies, computers, local transportation, etc.)
• Europe: The “Big Five” (CERN, DESY, INFN, PPARC, IN2P3) will
support their students and lecturers But we need money for supporting European students who
are not from these laboratories
Funding
7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 32
• Baseline Configuration Complete
• GDE Reorganized for RDR effort
• Design effort should be fully underway by Bangalore
• Design / Cost documented in RDR by 2007
• Beginning process of guiding Global R&D Effort
• Linear Collider Accelerator School looks promising
Conclusions