GASOLINE RANGE ETHER SYNTHESIS FROM LIGHT NAPHTHA PRODUCTS OF.pdf

download GASOLINE RANGE ETHER SYNTHESIS FROM LIGHT NAPHTHA PRODUCTS OF.pdf

of 6

Transcript of GASOLINE RANGE ETHER SYNTHESIS FROM LIGHT NAPHTHA PRODUCTS OF.pdf

  • 8/10/2019 GASOLINE RANGE ETHER SYNTHESIS FROM LIGHT NAPHTHA PRODUCTS OF.pdf

    1/6

    A

    \

    GASOLI NE RANGE ETHER SYNTHESI S FROM LI GHT NAPHTHA PRODUCTS OF

    FLUI D CATALYTI C CRACKI NG OF FI SCHER- TROPSCHWAX.

    W

    J . Reagan

    Amoco Oi l Company

    Naperv i l l e, I l l i noi s 60566

    Keywords: Fi scher - Tropsch wax, Fl ui d Cat al yti c Cr acki ng. Et her Synthesi s

    The Fl ui d Catal yti c Cr acki ng of Fi scher- Tropsch wax ( Czof par aff i ns) produces

    two to f our t i mes the concent r ati on of r eacti ve i so- ol ef i ns ( i sobut yl ene,

    i soarnyl enes, i sohexenes) t han obser ved f romconvent i onal gas oi l f eedst ocks.

    Met hanol reacts wi t h these ol ef i ns t o f orm the corr espondi ng t er t i ar y al kyl

    methyl ethers: MTBE. TAME and MTHE' s. These etheri f i cati on r eact i ons ar e

    ml dl y exotherm c and equi l i br i um l i m t ed. The r eact i on t emper at ure and t he

    ol ef i n mol ecul ar st r uct ur e are i mport ant var i abl es f or maxi mum ether yi el ds.

    The base napht ha research oct ane number i ncr eases by 2- 4 number s af t er t he

    et heri f i cat i on react i on.

    on ether yi el ds because of hydr ogenati on of r eacti ve ol efi ns t o par af f i ns.

    The cat al yti c cr acki ng of Fi scher- Tr opsch wax pr ovi des a non-convent i onal

    SOUKCe of ol ef i ns f or et her synt hesi s that can suppl ement exi st i ng and

    dw ndl i ng petr ol eumsuppl i es .

    I NTRODUCTI ON

    Fi scher- Tropsch (F-T) synt hesi s t echnol ogy (1) pr oduces l i qui d hydrocarbons

    f r om synt hesi s gas ( hydrogen and carbon monoxi de) deri ved f r omt he

    gas i f i cat i on of coal O r ef orm ng of nat ur al gas.

    consi st s of a br oad r ange of nor mal par aff i ns (C-C,+ and a smal l quant i t y

    of oxygenates and ol ef i ns. The di st i l l ate f r act i on, C+ i s an excel l ent

    qual i t y f uel . The l argest pr oduct f racti on. C, 8+ i s pr i mar i l y wax and is

    usel ess as a t r anspor t at i on f uel .

    convent i onal petr ol eum processes, such

    as

    hydr otr eat i ng, r efor m ng and

    cat al yt i c cracki ng to produce convent i onal gasol i ne and di st i l l ate

    f uel s .

    2 )

    Fl ui d Catal yt i c cr acki ng and hydr ocracki ng st udi es have been r epor t ed by

    Mobi l ( 3 ) and UOP. 4 ) Heavy wax C,,+) f r act i ons have also been t r eat ed

    wi t h hydroi someri zati on and hydr ocracki ng processes at Exxon. ( 5 )

    Hydr odewaxi ng and cat al yt i c cr acki ng t r eatment s of heavy wax f r omsl urr y F- T

    processi ng are al so repor t ed by Mobi l . ( 6 )

    I n

    addi t i on, pure component

    cr acki ng st udi es (decanol , decanal ) over the i nter medi ate

    -

    pore zeol i t e

    HZSM- 5 have been r epor t ed.

    ( 7 )

    exam ned i n some detai l by Woj ci echowski Over l arge- pore f auj asi t e

    (zeol i te

    Y)

    and over HZSM- 5 zeol i t e cat al yst s. ( 8. 9) Government al

    r egul at i ons, most r ecent l y i n t he Cl ean Ai r Act Amendment s of

    November , 1 9 9 0 . have r esul t ed i n the phaseout of l ead addi t i ves, l ower i ng

    of t he Rei d vapor pl ; essure of gasol i ne and i n some geographi cal ar eas, t he

    mandat ed use of oxygenat es.

    pr oduced and used

    as

    gasol i ne bl endi ng component s. (10) Recent st udi es of

    methyl t ert i ary but yl et her ( MTBE) and t ert i ary amyl methyl et her ( TAME)

    suggest t hat t hese compounds may r educe automat i ve car bon monoxi de

    em ssi ons, have hi gh bl endi ng gasol i ne oct ane r at i ngs, R+M/ 2, ( MTBE-108,

    TAME- 102) and have l o w Rei d Vapor pr essure. These et her s are pr oduced

    commerci al l y by t he ether i f i cat i on of t he appr opr i ate ol ef i n by methanol

    ( MTBE, i sobutyl ene; TAME, i soamyl enes). ( 11. 12) There i s l ess i nf ormati on i n

    the open l i t eratur e about t he et her i f i cat i on r eact i ons of C, ol ef i ns that

    are al so pr esent i n s i gni f i cant quanti t i es i n f l ui d cat al yt i c Cr acki ng

    product napht has.

    f r om C,-C, r eact i ve i so-ol efi ns i n napht has. One r eport

    (14)

    pr ovi des some

    i nf ormati on about t he r eact i on of C, i so- ol efi ns w t h methanol t o pr oduce

    the hi gher et her s, MTHE' s, methyl t ert i ary hexyl et her s. MTBE has attracted

    the most att ent i on i n recent year s.

    coul d reach 25%par year by 1995.

    ( 15. 16)

    There i s e gr owi ng need f or

    al t er nat i ve sour ces of ol efi ns f or ether synt heses as demand f ar t hese

    materi al s escal ates beyond t he capaci t y of conventi onal petr ol eumP KOC~SS ~S.

    There ar e no r eport ed st udi es of t he cat al yti c cracki ng processi ng of F-T

    l i qui ds t o pr oduce C,- C8 ol ef i ns as f eedst ocks f or t he synt hesi s

    of

    gasol i ne

    range

    ethers .

    EXPERI MENTAL

    The f eedst ock OK t hi s wor k i s a sampl e of r eact or wax f r oma commer ci al

    f i xed bed F- T uni t operated by Sasol , L i m t ed.

    char acteri zat i on of t hi s f eedstock i s avai l abl e i n other st udi es. ( 4) The

    smal l scal e (1 gramof f eed,

    3-5 gr ams of cat al yst ) cat al yti c cr acki ng t est s

    wer e perf ormed on a M cro Act i vi t y Test uni t ( MAT) si m l ar i n desi gn t o the

    uni t descr i bed i n ASTM procedur e.

    09907- 86. Thi s test uni t

    i s

    equi pped f or

    detai l ed anal yses of gas and l i qui d pr oduct s and cake yi el ds.

    pl ant t est s were conduct ed i n

    a

    c i rcul at i ng cat al ys t uni t s t m i l n r o i

    desi gn descr i bed by ARCO. Thi s uni t operates wi Lh

    2

    to 3 ki l ogr ams < i

    The presence of hydrogen has a det r i ment al ef f ect

    The F- T l i qui d pr oduct

    These pr oduct s ar e f urt her t r eat ed by

    The cat al yt i c cracki ng of F- T l i qui ds was

    Sever al t ypes of et her s are now commer ci al l y

    The Et her ol process (13) produces a m xed et her product

    The gr owt h r ate f ar i t s pr oduct i on

    The anal yti cal

    The pi l ot

    337

  • 8/10/2019 GASOLINE RANGE ETHER SYNTHESIS FROM LIGHT NAPHTHA PRODUCTS OF.pdf

    2/6

    catal yst and f eed rat es of 10- 30 gr ams/ m nut e.

    exper i ment s were Car r i ed out i n a convent i onal hi gh pressure m cro- r eact or.

    Tht ee FCC catal yst s,

    cont ai ni ng zeol i t e

    Y,

    zeol i t e Beta and zeol i t e HSZM- 5

    arb t he pri mary catal ysts f or t he FCC st udi es, The Y zeol i t e cat a l ys t i s an.

    Ul crastabl e Y f auj as i t e ( USY) zeol i t e cat al yst taken fr om one of Amoco s

    commerc i al FCC uni t s. The HZSM- 5 cat al yst

    is

    a commer ci al sampl e pr oduced by

    I ncer cat Gor p. The Beta s ampl e was prepar ed i n our l abor at ory by spray

    dr yi ng a commer ci al l y avai l abl e Beta zeol i t e and a convent i onal si l i ca-

    al um na matr i x. Two commer ci al i on exchange r esi n cat al yst s, Rohmand

    Haas' s Amber l yst 15 and Bayer ' s K 2 6 3 4 , were used i n t he et her s ynt hesi s

    The et her synt hesi s

    KU115.

    RESULTS AND DI SCUSSI ON.

    A. Cat al yt i c Cr acki ng Test s

    I ni t i a l catal yt i c Cracki ng runs wi t h t he smal l scal e test systemprovi de

    some i nsi ght s i nt o the cat al yt i c cracki ng behavi or of the wax f eedst ock.

    The

    i ni t i al choi ce of f l ui d c at a l yt i c c r ac ki ng

    ( FCC) catal yst and pr ocess

    condi t i ons f ocuses on compar i sons wi t h convent i onai gas oi l , t he usual

    f eedst ock t o commerc i al FCC uni t s. At t hese condi t i ons. (970' F r eacti on

    t emperat ure,

    3 cata l ys t

    to

    oi l wei ght r ati o), t he wax feedst ock readi l y

    COnVeKt S

    ( 8 5 +

    conver si on) t o hi gh yi el ds of C,- gas ( hi gh i n propyl ene and

    C, ol ef i ns) and napht ha (C -430' F). A Summar y of t hi s compari son is

    presented i n Tabl e

    I .

    The conversi on l evel i s def i ned by convent i on

    as

    t he

    sum of t he pr oduct s: napht ha, gas and coke, Thi s hi gh cat al yt i c cracki ng

    conver si on l evel

    f or t he wax f eedst ock agr ees wi t h the publ i shed Mobi l dat a

    3 . 6 ) on F- T wax cr acki ng. I n addi t i on. hi st ori cal pur e component

    hydrocarbon cr acki ng studi es

    ( 17) suggest t hat l ong chai n paraf f i ns cr ack at

    much gr eater Kate5 than t he short er chai n paraf f i ns.

    t he wax f eedst ock wi l l be an i mport ant par amet er when commer ci al heat

    bal anced Operat i ons are eval uat ed.

    wax product napht ha r esul t s f r om t he hi gher concentr at i ons of l ow octane

    number paraf f i ns compared t o t he gasol i ne f r om t he mor e ar omat i c gas oi l

    f eedst ocks. The oct ane number s i n the Tabl e I are est i mat ed resul t s f rom

    detai l ed naphtha anal yses by gas chromat ogr aphy and cor r el ati ons wi t h oct ane

    engi ne t est s. The t arget of t hese st udi es i s to opt i m ze the yi el ds of

    br anched ol ef i n i nter medi ates ( i sobut yl ene and i soamyl enes) f or et her

    synt hesi s . Three FCC catal yst s, cont ai ni ng zeol i t e

    Y,

    zeol i t e Beta, and

    zeol i t e HZSH- 5,

    wer e test ed f or

    wax C O ~ V ~ K S ~ O ~

    nd product sel ect i vi t y as a

    ser i es of b l ends wi t h an i ner t sol i d. Tabl e I1 pr esent s t he det ai l ed

    pr oduct d i st r i but i ons f or t he t hr ee catal ysts at a s i m l ar conver s i on l evel

    of about 8 3 .

    of the desi r abl e ol e f i ns, However . th i s OCCUKS at t he expense of napht ha

    pr oduct .

    pr opyl ene. These scr eeni ng t est r esul t s show t hat FCC catal yst vari at i ons

    can provi de f or w del y di f f erent pr oduct di st r i but i ons.

    8. Pi l ot P l ant Cata l yt i c Cracki ng Test s .

    Some i ni t i a l wax cat al yt i c cr ack i ng screeni ng t ests on the pi l ot pl ant uni t

    ar e pr esent ed i n Tabl e 111.

    t he pi l ot pl ant agree wi t h the smal l

    scal e

    test resul t s .

    cat al yst convert s

    a

    great er f r act i on of the wax f eedstock to l i ght ol e f i ns,

    i ncl udi ng propyl ene, i sobut yl ene and i soamyl enes. t han the

    Y

    zeol i t e

    cat a l ys t .

    napht ha yi el d f or t he Bet a zeol i t e cat al yst compar ed to t he st andard Y

    zeol i t e cat a l ys t .

    s i m l ar to the Beta zeol i t e.

    Hi gh yi el ds of the t argec l i ght ol ef i ns ar e

    produced but t he napht ha yi el d i s much l ower t han the Y zeol i t e cat a l ys t .

    Thi s t rade- of f of l i ght ol ef i n and napht ha yi el ds can be adj ust ed by t he

    amount of t he HZSM- 5 addi t i ve.

    pl ant Catal yti c cr acki ng r uns were combi ned and di st i l l ed ( ASTMKethod

    0 - 2 8 9 2 ) to pr oduce l i ght napht ha (QOO F) f r acti ons f or t he ether i f i cati on

    studi es .

    The l ow coke yi el d of

    The r el at i vel y l ow oct ane number of t he

    Bot h t he Bet a and HZSH- 5 cat al yst s produce much hi gher yi el ds

    I n addi t i on, t he HZSH- 5 cat al yst pr oduces ver y hi gh yi el ds of

    The hi gh conver si ons of the wax f eedstock i n

    The Beta zeol i t e

    The hi gher ol ef i n y i e l ds are off set by a s i gni f i cant l y l ower

    The t est r esul t s for t he HZSH- 5 cat al yst m xture are

    The total l i qui d products f romsever al p i l ot

    C . Et her Synt hesi s.

    Si nce the r eact i on of i sobut yl ene and methanol to f orm MTBE i s wel l known,

    thi s st udy wi l l f ocus on t he producti on of TAME and KTHE ethers f r om the

    l i ght napht ha pr oducts of the pi l ot pl ant wax cracki ng st udi es.

    f i xed bed uni t was used f or t hese et her i f i cat i on st udi es. The i ni t i a l t est

    runs i nvol ve the r eact i on of 2-Kethyl - 2- but ene wi t h methanol to pr oduce

    TAKE.

    i soamyl ene to TAME: mol es TAME out/ mol es i soamyl ene i n*100) .

    condi t i ons are: vari abl e t emperatures, 200

    PSIC

    uni t pr essure, 0 . 6 6 WHSV

    (ol ef i n) and 1. 2 mol rat i o of met hanol / ol ef i n.

    i s Amber l yst 15,

    a

    commerci al ether i f i cat i on cat al yst The r eact i on

    t empcr aLure is

    R

    m a j o r f actor I n L hf s eLher i Cl cnLi on

    re.wt. Ion.

    A smal l .

    Tabl e I V shows t he compar i son of TAME yi el ds ( conver si on of

    The test

    The cat al yst f or t hese r uns

    TIIV a l ~ i ~ r , ,

    338

  • 8/10/2019 GASOLINE RANGE ETHER SYNTHESIS FROM LIGHT NAPHTHA PRODUCTS OF.pdf

    3/6

    c

    I

    I

    r i se i n TAME yi el d at 150 F and t he decl i ne at 200' F suggest s t hat

    equi l i br i uml i m t at i ons exi st at t hese t emper at ur es and r eact i on condi t i ons .

    The maxi mumyi el ds of et her s wi l l occur at t hese equi l i br i umcondi t i ons.

    Tabl e V pr esent s t he det ai l ed composi t i on of the l i ght napht ha sampl es f r om

    t he Pi l ot pl ant wax cat al yt i c cr acki ng KUnS.

    sampl es, f eeds 8 and

    C ,

    are hi gher f r om the pi l ot pl ant wax cat al yt i c

    cr acki ng runs t han t he l i ght naphtha sampl e. f eed " A".

    Use Of hi gh ol ef i n sel ecti ve FCC cat al yst s, Beta and HZSM- 5.

    i n the pi l ot

    pl ant r uns, Nos. 940- 01, 02 and 941- 01. The same

    Y

    zeol i t e cata l ys t w a s used

    i n the r uns f or f eed "A" and

    "C"

    ,

    r esul t s f r om the l ower conver si on l evel . The reacti ve i soamyl enes, 2-

    Methyl - 2-butene and 2- Met hyl - 1- but ene f or TAME synt hesi s and the r eact i ve C,

    i so- ol ef i ns. 2- Methyl - 1- pent ene. 2- Met hyl - 2- pent ene. 2. 3- Di met hyl - 1- but ene.

    and Ci s and t r ans 3- Met hyl - 2- pent ene f or MTHE synt hesi s ar e t he i mpor t ant

    components . Thi s l i ght napht ha. f eed "A" sampl e and met hanol are t he

    f eedst ock f or a seri es of ether i f i cat i on r uns at the same pr ocess condi t i ons

    f or t he 2-Hethyl-2-butene/methanol t es ts . Due to the l i m ted avai l abi l i t y

    of t he napht ha, onl y t wo r eact i on t emperatures ar e avai l abl e.

    t he conversi on of t he vari ous C and C, i so- ol ef i ns to t hei r r espect i ve

    met hyl et her s, Tabl e VI . shows t hat r eact i on t emper at ure

    i s

    a maj or f actor

    i n the et her i f i cat i on r eact i on. The decrease

    i n conver si on

    w t h the

    i ncrease i n the car bon number of the i so-ol efi n agr ees wi t h ot her l i t eratur e

    ether i f i cat i on s tudi es .

    ( 18. 20)

    The r eact i on pr oduct s f r omt hese r uns have

    a s i gni f i cant yel l ow col or, especi al l y at the hi gher r eact i on t emper at ur e of

    150F.

    tests . I t i s l i kel y that pol ymer i zat i on of o l ef i ns to

    C,,+

    hydr ocar bon

    "col or bodi es" i s responsi bl e f or the col or ed pr oduct . The col or of t he

    et her product coul d be a si gni f i cant pr oduct qual i t y i ssue.

    pr esent s t he r esul t s of the et heri f i cat i on r uns wi t h t he "B" and "C"

    l i ght

    napht has at 15OF. I n t hese r uns, both Amber l yst 15 and another CO~e r Ci a l

    et her i f i cat i on cat al yst , gayer' s K2634 ar e under st udy.

    The

    Bayer catal yst

    cont ai ns a nobl e met al i n addi t i on to t he str ong aci d f unct i onal i t y.

    nobl e metal i s avai l abl e f ar o l ef i n i somer i zat i on and di ol ef i n sat urat i on,

    i n the pr esence of hydrogen.

    pr evi ous set of r uns,

    200

    P S I G , 2. 9 gr ams of cat al yst , met hanol 1. 37 g/ hr ,

    napht ha, 5 . 5 g/hr ar e t he same except t hat onl y one r eact i on t emper at ure.

    150'F. i s avai l abl e. The i so- ol ef i n conver si on r esul t s are si m l ar for bot h

    catal yst s and the t hree f eedstocks. i n the absence of hydrogen gas i n t he

    r eact or. The cal cul ated r esearch octane val ues f or t he products of t hese

    ether i f i cat i on r uns ar e 2- 4 number s hi gher t han t he st art i ng l i ght napht ha

    Feedst ocks, Tabl e

    VI I I .

    As expect ed, t hi s oct ane i ncrease depends, t o some

    ext ent upon t he concent r at i ons of t he ether s i n the pr oduct.

    octane number s f or t he m xed ether l i ght napht ha f r act i ons ar e al so shown i n

    Tabl e VI I I . There i s a f ai r agreement wi t h the cal cul ated ( by

    G C

    oct ane

    numbers . When hydr ogen gas i s pres ent , Run No. 034- 1, Tabl e VI I I , t here i s

    a maj or l oss of i so- ol ef i n conver s i on. These react i on condi t i ons resul t i n

    the hydr ogenat i on of bot h react i ve i so- ol ef i ns and l i near o l ef i ns . Thi s i s

    an undesi r abl e r esul t si nce bot h t he pr oducti on of ethers and t he octane

    number of t he pr oduct decr eases si gni f i cant l y. The r un wi t h added hydrogen

    gas, 034- 1, has a l ower r esear ch oct ane r ati ng ( 79. 5) t han t he f eedstock

    ( 84. 6) or t he r un wi t h no added hydr ogen, 034- 3, ( 8 5 . 8 ) . Thi s octane l oss

    i s due t o t he conver si on of hi gh oct ane val ue ol ef i ns to l ow oct ane val ue

    para f f i ns .

    ether i f i cat i on products i n the pr esence of hydr ogen gas.

    These et her i f i cat i on r uns cl ear l y demonst r ate t hat t he l i ght napht ha

    f ract i ons f r om the cat al yt i c cracki ng of Fi scher- Tropsch wax ar e excel l ent

    ether synt hesi s feedst ocks.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    Thi s work

    was

    suppor t ed by t he U S . Depar t ment of Ener gy. Pi t t sbur gh Ener gy

    Technol ogy Cent er . Pi t t sbur gh. Pennsyl vani a under Cont r act No. DE- AC22-

    91PC90057. D. Kovach and R. Br own per f or med t he exper i mental wor k.

    3 .

    Newbur y pr ovi ded the

    GC

    napht ha anal yses.

    REFERENCES

    The i so- ol ef i n content s of the

    Thi s i s due to t he

    The hi gh i so- ol ef i n cont ent of f eed

    C

    A s ummar y of

    Thi s cal or i s not present f or t he pur e component 2- Met hyl butene-:

    Tabl e V I 1

    The

    The nom nal r eact i on condi t i ons f r omt he

    Bl endi ng

    There i s a si gni f i cant i mpr ovement i n the col or of t he

    1.

    2 .

    3.

    4.

    5

    Anderson, R. B. The Fi scher - Tropsch Synthesi s; Academ c ( New York),

    1984.

    Stuar t , J .

    S . ,

    et el . Oi l h Gas J our nal , August 31. 1981, 62.

    Kuo.

    J .

    C.

    W , et al . 1988 AI ChE Annual Meet i ng (Washi ngt on, DC,

    11/ 17/ 88. Pr epr i nt No. 61D) ; 1984 AI ChE Annual Meet i ng ( Anahei m

    Cal i f orni a. Prepr i nt No. 11D); Depart ment of Energy. Fi nal Report ,

    Oct ober, 1985,

    DOE/ PC/ 60019-9A.

    Shah,

    P.

    P.. et al . " F- T Wax Char acter i zat i on and Upgr adi ng"; Fi nal

    Report . Depar t ment of Ener gy. J une

    6 ,

    1988. DOE/ PC/ 80017- T1.

    Exxon RLE Company ,

    U . S .

    L. 832. 819. May 23, 1989.

    339

  • 8/10/2019 GASOLINE RANGE ETHER SYNTHESIS FROM LIGHT NAPHTHA PRODUCTS OF.pdf

    4/6

    6. Hobil

    Oil Company, U.S. 4,684,75 6, August 4 1987.

    7. Riley, M . ; Anthony, R. G. J . Cat.. 103, 87-94, 1987.

    8. Abbot, J.: Wojciechowski. B. W . Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod, Res Dev.1985.24,

    9. Kobolskis. I.; Wojciechowski. B.

    W

    Can.

    J

    Chem. Eng., 6 3, April 1985,

    10

    Piel,

    W .

    J

    Energy Progress,

    8.

    No.

    4

    201.

    1988; Oil

    6

    Gas

    J . .

    11.

    Reychler, A. Bull. SOC . Chim. Belg. ; 21, 71 (1907).

    12.

    Ancillotti,

    F..

    et al.. J . Catalysis; 46, 49-57 (1977).

    13. Halsig, C. P.. et el ., NPRA, 1986 Annual Meeting, Paper AH-86-94.

    14. Krause, A.

    0

    I.. et al.. 8th l n t Gong. Cecal., 5 .

    553,

    1984.

    15. Oil 6 Gas J . , January 27,1992, 21.

    16. Oil 6 Gas J . , November 30,1 992, 48.

    17. C o m a , A, ; Wojclechowski, B. W. Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng ., 27(1),

    501-507.

    269-277.

    December 4 , 1989, 60.

    29-150. 1985

    Convers ion,

    w t X

    P l O h l S t l .

    r t X :

    c

    c.

    C

    430.F

    43O.Ft

    Coke

    I r ob t y l cnc

    I . O ~ l C C I

    Naphtha, u r n

    MOW

    Gas

    o i l UI)I

    61.6 88.1

    2.6 1.8

    11.6 31.4

    6.9 15.9

    36.2 36.8

    38.4 11.9

    4 3 2.2

    1.3 4.5

    2.3 5.8

    90.4 85.8

    79.8 77.6

    T M LE I1

    U T IEST RESILIS--UTALIST

    oDIpARIso*S

    AT mLIF

    Z e o l i t e Befa

    042

    85.3

    C a t a l y s t

    1

    Z e o l i t e Y

    u r n

    Y O.

    c onv e r s i on . U t % 83.0

    le01 t c HLsn-5

    055

    85 . 8

    Product Y i e l d s , Ut :

    c;

    c

    C

    C

    C

    ;

    C,.430 F

    430.F

    Coke

    0.6

    7.4

    0.8

    13.2

    3.7

    11.7

    3.6

    41.7

    17.0

    0.3

    l s o b t y l e n c

    l r o a m y l m e s

    G-430.F

    57.0

    85.2

    16.2

    ON

    K W

    340

  • 8/10/2019 GASOLINE RANGE ETHER SYNTHESIS FROM LIGHT NAPHTHA PRODUCTS OF.pdf

    5/6

    1ABLE 111

    P l l O l pu*T m s

    Feed IO: 92-0490-01A 93-0024-011

    reed

    A*

    reed

    B

    Pilot P l a n t

    939-01. +

    02

    v40-01. 02

    m NOS. 4 us7 CDt.l St 941-01

    conversion = 93.6% 8etalHZSU-5

    C a t a l y s t

    convers ions = 90.96%

    r o t a l P a r a f f i n s w t X 6.69 8.44

    T o t a l I r o - p . r a f f l n 9 U t 42.71 17.64

    To t a l A r m t i c 9 wtX 1.74 2.62

    T o t a l NsPhthems W t X 3.96 5.55

    T ot al o l c f i m YtX 44.51 64.47

    ~ e a c t i v e r o - o le f in r

    wtX

    93-0024-01C

    Feed

    C

    939-04

    4

    SY Cstalyst

    C m e r . i M 3%

    4.32

    22.88

    0.35

    3.16

    68.6

    1.25

    4.26

    C6's

    2 , 3 - d i m t h y l h t c n c

    2-mthyL.l.pnrcne

    Z-nrthyl-2-pntene

    S - m t h y L - t r a n s - 2 - p n t e m

    I - r e t hy l - v i s -Z -pn t em

    2.15

    .67

    0.8 0 . n 0.97

    2.35

    2.49 3.02

    4.01 5.27 5.46

    2.49 3.13 3.29

    3.98 5.48 5.35

    1.76

    5.64

    341

  • 8/10/2019 GASOLINE RANGE ETHER SYNTHESIS FROM LIGHT NAPHTHA PRODUCTS OF.pdf

    6/6

    I so -o le f in C 1Z'F

    2~Wethyl-l-bUtene 85.4

    2-nrthyl -Z-brtme

    2P.P

    2.3 Dimethyl-l-butene

    56.5

    2-Wethyl - l -pntme

    65.9

    2-Methyl.Z-pnttne 20.7

    3-Wethyl-ci~-Z-penCene 21.7

    cs

    C6

    3-Wethy l - t rans-Z -penfene

    20.8

    150'6

    G

    8P.P

    65.5

    83.4

    87.5

    48 6

    38.6

    2P.8

    i r o -o le f in

    c-ent

    2-Methy1-l-butcne

    2-Methy1-2.butane 65.5 62.2 M.2 42.9 38.2 61.2

    89 9 b0.2 87.1 77.2 78.1 87.7

    200.F-

    Naphtha

    Reaction

    T a p .F

    Catalyst

    Feed

    A

    F e d B

    Feed

    C

    P2-04P-OlA

    92-0024-01A PI-0024-01C

    150 150

    50 150 150

    50

    lnberlyrt 15 Ir he r ly st 15 12634 12634 12634

    K2634

    No

    H2 H2 H2

    No

    H2

    TLBLE V I 1 1

    2.3.0Incthyl-l-butene

    C6'r

    2-nechyl- l -pmtme

    2-Methy1-2-pentenc

    3-Mefhyl -Ci s-2-pntene

    3-nc~hy l - t ranr -Z-pntenc

    ...

    eed

    A

    -0-01A

    15586-024-2 125.F

    15586-024-6 15UF

    15586-024-8 150.F

    Feed

    P3-0026-01A

    15586-031-2 150.F

    05586-033-1 150.F

    15586-033-3 150.6

    ...

    83 . 4 ... ...

    87.5 85.5 84.1 72.2 78.6 86.P

    48 6

    56.1 62.7 44.2 31.5 51.5

    38.6 31.0 43.4 23.8 7.3

    25.8

    2P.B

    32.2 43.7 25.P 20.7

    33.3

    ...

    93-0024-OlC

    15586-034-1 1W F

    RV no.

    Feed A

    G O - O l A

    15586-024-2

    15586-024-6

    15586-024-8

    Feed

    15586-031-2

    15586-033-3

    Feed C

    ps-ooi4-OIA

    05586-033.1

    OCtllM

    Nlnber

    80.P2

    w r l y r t 15 80 . OP

    83.76

    w r 1 y r t

    15

    83.88

    I * O .

    P araf fi ns pa raf f in s A ~ m t i ~ s aphthenes O l ef i ns OxyeCnateS V n t n o ~ n s

    6 689

    42.712

    1.736 3.956 44.507

    0.071 0.33

    7.806

    40.230

    1.W5 4.474

    33.762

    11.406 0.34

    6 463

    40.42P

    2.247 4.576

    29.671

    16.294 0.32

    6.337 4 0 . 4 M

    2.263

    4.586 2'9.58

    16 436 0 . 3 3

    m.437

    17.617 2.623

    5 . 5 4 ~ 64.472

    0.17 1.11

    7.381

    1 7 . ~ 0 3 . 6~ 1

    6.583

    41.716

    22.44s 0 .844

    7.417

    17.989

    3.647 6 424

    41.847 21.815 0.821

    8.205 1 7 . M

    3.62 6.512

    45 889

    17.277 0.83

    84.56

    95.9

    ayer

    H2 12634 m.47

    88.P

    Keyer no H2 12634 85.78

    95 9

    ...

    *CBlC l.ted

    342