Gas Dispersion and de-Inking in Flotation Column
-
Upload
alonso-patricio-herrera-guzman -
Category
Documents
-
view
21 -
download
3
Transcript of Gas Dispersion and de-Inking in Flotation Column
-
5/20/2018 Gas Dispersion and de-Inking in Flotation Column
Gas dispersion and de-inking in a flotation column
H. Hernaandez 1, C.O. Goomez, J.A. Finch *
Department of Mining, Metals & Materials Engineering, McGill University, 3610 University, Montreal, Qc., Canada H3A 2B2
Received 14 March 2003; accepted 2 May 2003
Abstract
The role of four gas dispersion parameters in ink particle collection was investigated in 4 00 and 2000 flotation columns. Gas holdup
(eg) and superficial gas velocity (Jg) were measured on-line and bubble size (db) was estimated using drift flux analysis that enabled
bubble surface area flux (Sb) to be calculated. Operating with approximately zero froth depth ink recovery as a function of retention
time (controlled by underflow rate) was determined. Using a mixing model, the collection zone flotation rate constant (kc) wasestimated from the recoverytime data. The rate constant was not related to Jg or db but was linearly dependent on eg and Sb,
similar to findings in mineral flotation studies.
2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Froth flotation; Flotation kinetics; Modeling
1. Introduction
Flotation involves contacting particles (typically
-
5/20/2018 Gas Dispersion and de-Inking in Flotation Column
the gas holdup and to control the position of the pulp/
froth interface (i.e., level). The air rate was regulated by
a mass flowmeter/controller. A peristaltic pump (with I/
O card) and a centrifugal pump controlled the flow of
feed and underflow, 3 respectively. The feed and un-
derflow rates were measured by magnetic flowmeter with
signal conversion and were regulated using control
valves. Bubble generation used three porous stainless
steel spargers supplied by Mott Industrial with nominal
pore size 0.5, 2 and 20 lm. The temperature was mea-
sured with an ICTD probe. All instruments were mon-
itored using a serial communication interface OPTO and
a computer. The software package for data collection
and column operation was FIXDMACS version 6.1.
The general set-up and layout is shown in Fig. 2.
2.2. Procedure
The columns were fed continuously with pulp (45C, 1.2% w/w solids, pH 10 (NaOH) and surfactant,a blend of stearic and oleic fatty acid soaps) from the
feed end of the de-inking plant flotation circuit (ca. 1.2%w/w solids). The chemical conditions were not altered.
Level was controlled with the feed rate and set to within
12 cm of the column overflow lip, i.e., operation with
essentially zero froth depth. The feed and underflow
rates, gas rate and gas holdup were monitored during
each experiment. Samples of 1 L were taken from the
underflow and feed streams as a function of time when
steady-state conditions were achieved. The particle re-
tention time was controlled with the underflow rate. Ink
recovery was measured according to Bowaters proce-
dure and calculated as follows:
RinkCiSiQiqi CoSoQoqo
CiSiQiqi 1
whereSis the % w/w solids, Q the volumetric flowrate, q
the stream density and the subscripts refer to initial (i)
and final (o) values. The ink concentration C(ppm) was
measured using the reflectance of paper pads at a
wavelength of 950 nm in a Technidyne Micro TB-1C
machine. An average of 10 values (5 per side) was ob-
tained.
2.3. Pulp (collection) zone mixing model
Recovery in the collection zone (Rc) is a function of
the rate constant (kc), ink particle residence time (sp) and
degree of mixing, represented by the vessel dispersion
number (Nd). One extreme of mixing is plug flow
(Nd! 0), where all elements have the same residencetime and there is a concentration gradient of floatable
particles along the axis of the column. The other ex-
treme is a completely mixed reactor (Nd! 1), where adistribution of residence time exists and the concentra-
tion is the same throughout the vessel (Levenspiel,
1999). For a first-order rate process with plug flow and
perfect mixing transport Rc is given by Eqs. (2) and (3)respectively:
Rc Req1 expkcsp 2
Rc Req 1
"
1
1 kcsp
# 3
where Req is the equilibrium (or maximum) recovery at
long flotation time.
For vessels with levels of mixing between the two
extremes, the relationship between Rc and Nd can be
given by the axial dispersion model (Levenspiel, 1999):
Fig. 1. Column flotation test facility at Bowaters de-inking plant.
3 In de-inking the underflow is called the accepts.
Fig. 2. General experimental set-up.
740 H. Hernaandez et al. / Minerals Engineering 16 (2003) 739744
-
5/20/2018 Gas Dispersion and de-Inking in Flotation Column
Rc Req 1
24 4A exp 12Nd
1 A
2exp A
2Nd
1 A
2exp A
2Nd
35
4
where: A 1 4kcsinkNd1=2
An expression for the vessel dispersion number Nd asa function of design and operating variables for the
system had been previously derived (Hernandez et al.,
2001) based on the form suggested by Luttrell et al.
(1990), namely:
Nd 1:3 Dc
Hc
Jg
Jl1
eg0:67
5
where Dc and Hc are column diameter and height, re-
spectively. With the estimate of vessel dispersion num-
ber from Eq. (5) substituted in Eq. (4) the rate constant
was calculated.
2.4. Bubble size
In the absence of direct bubble size measurement,
which is only now becoming available for flotation
systems (Hernandez-Aguilar et al., 2002; Grau and
Heiskanan, 2002; Randall et al., 1989), bubble size is
estimated. A method derived from drift flux analysis
using gas rate and gas holdup is employed (Banisi and
Finch, 1994).
3. Results
The rate equations require Req, which, from inspec-
tion of the data, was 87%, a consistent finding in test
work at this Bowater operation (Watson, 1996; Leichtle,
1998; Hardie, 1998). In the lab column where the height/
diameter ratio is 60 plug flow can be assumed (Finchand Dobby, 1990) where the flotation rate constant (kc)
is the slope of the plot ln1 Rc=Req against residencetime (sp). Fig. 3 shows this assumption is supported.
Nevertheless to be consistent the rate constants for alltests, lab and pilot scale, were determined using the axial
dispersion model given by Eq. (4).
The dependence of kc on the various gas dispersion
parameters was explored. Against gas rate (Fig. 4) the
data divide into a set for each column while against gas
holdup a reasonably linear dependence was found (Fig.
5). Against bubble size (Fig. 6) no relationship is ap-
parent (if anything, an inverse dependence is antici-
pated) while the dependence on Sb shows agreement
with a linear relationship (Fig. 7). The slope (i.e., P) is
ca. 104 (dimensionless).
Fig. 3. Test of plug flow assumption for lab column (sparger, 0.5 lm).
Fig. 4. Flotation rate constant as a function of superficial gas velocity.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Gas holdup, Eg (%)
Flotationrateconstant,
kc(1/min)
4" Lab 20" Pilot
Fig. 5. Flotation rate constant as a function of gas holdup.
H. Hernaandez et al. / Minerals Engineering 16 (2003) 739744 741
-
5/20/2018 Gas Dispersion and de-Inking in Flotation Column
4. Discussion
To test the dependence of rate constant on the gas
dispersion parameters requires integration of several
measurements. The work of Gorain et al., Heiskanen
(2000) and Heiskanen et al. (2001) illustrate some of the
issues. The system employed here offered the advantages
of operation without a froth (thus collection rate con-
stant is determined directly rather than having to de-
couple from froth effects) and low % solids (thus
approaching the assumption of a first-order process,
which Fig. 3 indicates was met. The disadvantages are
the need to estimate the rate constant from a mixing
model and the need to compute db. Experience in col-
umns suggests the estimate ofdb is within 15% of the
Sauter mean (Yianatos et al., 1988). The particle size
range may be considered wide, ink particles are typically
1implies that bubble size has more impact on the rate
constant than a linear dependence onSb would indicate.
It may be that the variation in bubble size is too limited
(Fig. 6 shows a range of only 0.1 to 0.2 cm) and a linear
dependence on Sb emerges as an approximation. The
range of bubble size available in an operating machine
tends, however, to be limited and thus the approxima-
tion may be practical. Bubble size is controlled by ma-chine design and operating variables, most of which are
fixed except for gas rate and frother dosage. If frother
concentration is constant the dbJg relationship could
be calibrated, then Sb becomes a function of Jg only
(Xu et al., 1991; Gomez and Finch, 2002). Fig. 4 hints at
this (surfactant dosage was not varied in our tests): the
rate constant is reasonably correlated with gas rate for
the two columns individually.
The linear kcSb relationship has excited much at-
tention, forming the basis of one approach to flotation
modeling (Gorian et al., 2000; Harris and Harris, 2002).
Apart from the database being limited in bubble size
range it is also dominated by relatively fine particles
(again the case here). Heiskanen et al. (2001) found
linearity was approached only for the finest particles
(
-
5/20/2018 Gas Dispersion and de-Inking in Flotation Column
have been used to remedy instrument and machine
malfunctions and define the cell operating range (Dahlke
et al., 2001). We have used measurement ofSb to help
unravel summer/winter metallurgy swings (communica-
tion in preparation); to evaluate changes in rotor speed
and location in a mechanical machine (as reported by
Kerr et al., 2003); and, in scaling up a de-inking column,to select from among candidate sparger types, finding
that while all operated on the same recoverySb line
some could not deliver sufficient Sb (Finch et al., 1999).
Surveys show Sb in the range 2050 s1 (Deglon et al.,
2000) with a maximum ca. 100120 s1 before the
cell floods (or boils) (Finch et al., 1999; Gorain
et al., 1997; Xu et al., 1991). Being well below the
maximum may imply the operating Sb seeks a compro-
mise among rate of flotation, entrainment and froth
transport. In a bank of cells, a certain profile of Sbmay be optimal (Gomez and Finch, 2002; Dahlke et al.,
2001).
5. Conclusions
De-inking in a flotation column was used to test the
dependence of the pulp zone rate constant on the gas
dispersion parameters. A linear relationship with bubble
surface area flux was found as reported in mineral flo-
tation in mechanical machines. A linear dependence on
gas holdup was also found supporting a previous sug-
gestion that these two gas dispersion parameters can be
interchanged.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Bowater Gatineaus mill
for providing equipment and test facilities. Special
thanks are also given to the Mechanical and Chemi-
mechanical Wood-Pulps Network (Natural Sciences and
Engineering Council of Canada Network of Excellence)
for their financial support, and the Consejo Nacional de
Ciencia y Tecnologa (CONACYT) of Mexico for a
scholarship to H.H.
References
Ahmed, N., Jameson, G.J., 1989. Flotation kinetics. Miner. Process.
Extra. Metall. Rev. 5, 7199.
Banisi, S., Finch, J., 1994. Reconciliation of bubble size estimation
methods using drift flux analysis. Miner. Eng. 7 (12), 15551559.
Dahlke, R., Scott, D., Leroux, D., Gomez, C.O., Finch, J.A., 2001.
Trouble shooting flotation cell operation using gas velocity
measurements. Proceedings 33rd Annual Meeting of the Canadian
Mineral Processors, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 359370.
Deglon, D.A., Egya-Mensah, D., Franzidis, J.P., 2000. Review of
hydrodynamics and gas dispersion in flotation cells on the South
African platinum concentrators. Miner. Eng. 13 (3), 235244.
Finch, J., Dobby, G., 1990. Column Flotation. Pergamon Press.
Finch, J., Gomez, C., Hardie, C., Leichtle, G., Filippone, R., Leroux,
D., 1999. Bubble surface area flux: a parameter to characterize
flotation cells. Proceedings 31st Annual Meeting of the Canadian
Mineral Processors, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 199210.
Finch, J., Xiao, J., Hardie, C., Gomez, C., 2000. Gas dispersion
properties: bubble surface area flux and gas holdup. Miner. Eng. 13
(14), 365372.
Gomez, C.O., Finch, J.A., 2002. Gas dispersion measurements inflotation machines. CIM. Bull. 95 (1066), 7378.
Gorain, B.K., Franzidis, J.-P., Manlapig, E.V., 1995a. Studies on
impeller speed and air flow rate in an industrial scale flotation cell.
Part 1. Effectof bubblesize distribution.Miner. Eng. 8 (6), 615635.
Gorain, B.K., Franzidis, J.-P., Manlapig, E.V., 1995b. Studies on
impeller speed and air flow rate in an industrial scale flotation cell.
Part 2. Effect of gas holdup. Miner. Eng. 8 (12), 15571570.
Gorain, B.K., Franzidis, J.-P., Manlapig, E.V., 1996. Studies on
impeller speed and air flow rate in an industrial scale flotation cell.
Part 3. Effect of superficial gas velocity. Miner. Eng. 9 (6), 639654.
Gorain, B.K., Franzidis, J.-P., Manlapig, E.V., 1997. Studies on
impeller type, impeller speed and air flow rate in an industrial scale
flotation cell. Part 4: Effect of bubble surface area flux on flotation
performance. Miner. Eng. 10 (4), 367379.
Gorian, B.K., Franzidis, J.-P., Ward, K., Johnson, N.W., Manlapig,
E.V., 2000. Modeling of the Mount Isa rougher-scavenger copper
flotation circuit using size-by-liberation data. Miner. Metall.
Process. 17 (3), 173180.
Gorain, B.K., Napier-Mun, T., Franzidis, J.-P., Manlapig, E.V., 1998.
Studies in impeller type, impeller speed, and air flow rate in an
industrial scale flotation cell. Part 5: Validation ofkSb relationship
and effect of froth depth. Miner. Eng. 11 (7), 615626.
Grau, R.A., Heiskanan, K., 2002. Visual technique for measuring
bubble size in flotation machines. Miner. Eng. 15, 507513.
Hardie, C., 1998. In-plant comparison of internal and external
spargers for column flotation de-inking. Master Thesis, McGill
University.
Harris, C.C., Harris, T., 2002. A pilot-scale evaluation of the effect of
grind size on the recovery of a UG2 platinum ore. Proceedings 34th
Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors, Ottawa,
Canada, pp. 485502.
Heiskanen, K., 2000. On the relationship between flotation rate and
bubble surface area flux. Miner. Eng. 13 (2), 141149.
Heiskanen, K., Junnikkala, S., Fohr, K., 2001. Results from Phyha-
salmi concentrator on bubble surface area flux and flotation rate
relationship as a function of particle size. 33rd Annual Meeting of
the Canadian Mineral Processors, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 107118.
Hernandez, H., Gomez, C.O., Finch, J.A., 2001. A test of the flotation
rate constant vs. bubble surface area flux relationship, Interactions
in Mineral Processing. Proceedings of 4th UBC-McGill Interna-
tional Symposium on the Fundamentals of Mineral Processing,
40th Annula Conference of Metallurgists of CIM, August 2629,
Toronto, Canada.
Hernandez-Aguilar, J.R., Gomez, C.O., Finch, J.A., 2002. A techniquefor the direct measurement of bubble size distributions in industrial
flotation cells. 34th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral
Processors, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 389402.
Kerr, A., Barrett, J., Bouchard, A., Labonte, G., Truskoski, J., 2003.
The Mill Redesign Project at INCOs Clarabelle mill. Proceedings
35th annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors, Ottawa,
Canada, pp 2950.
Leichtle, G.F., 1998. Analysis of bubble generating devices in a de-
inking column. Master Thesis, McGill University.
Levenspiel, O., 1999. Chemical Reaction Engineering, third ed. John
Wiley & Sons, New York.
Lindsay, J.D., Mostafa, S., 1995. Macroscopic flow structures in
bubbling paper pulp-water slurry. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. (34), 3342
3353.
H. Hernaandez et al. / Minerals Engineering 16 (2003) 739744 743
-
5/20/2018 Gas Dispersion and de-Inking in Flotation Column
Luttrell, G., Yan, S., Adel, G.T., Yoon, R.H., 1990. A computer-aided
design package for column flotation. Society of Mining Engineers,
Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, USA.
Randall, E.W., Goodall, C.M., Fairlamb, P.M., Dold, P.L., OCon-
nor, C.T., 1989. A method for measuring sizes of bubbles in two
and three phase systems. Journal of Physics, E: Science and
Instrumentation 22, 827833.
Ventura-Medina, E., Cilliers, J.J., 2002. A model to describe flotation
perfromance based on the physics of foams and froth imageanalysis. Int. J. Min. Process. 67, 7999.
Watson, J.A., 1996. De-inking recycled paper using column flotation,
Master Thesis, McGill University.
Xu, M., Uribe-Salas, A., Finch, J.A., 1991. Maximum gas and bubble
surface area rates in column flotation. Int. J. Min. Process 32, 233
250.
Yianatos, J.B., Finch, J.A., Dobby, G.S., Xu, M., 1988. Bubble
size estimation in a bubble swarm. J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 126, 37
44.
Yoon, R.H., 1993. Microbubble flotation. Miner. Eng. 6 (6), 619630.
744 H. Hernaandez et al. / Minerals Engineering 16 (2003) 739744