Garfield Middle School Sailing Toward Success
-
Upload
irma-sharpe -
Category
Documents
-
view
32 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Garfield Middle School Sailing Toward Success
Garfield Middle School
Sailing Toward Success
School wide Plan 2009-2010
Patricia MassaPrincipal
Submitted July 16, 2008By:Elizabeth Anton
Table of Contents1. GMS Schoolwide Plan Introduction
GMS School Profile
Vision
Components of a Schoolwide Program
2. Schoolwide Planning TeamsSchool Council Members Leadership Team Members Instructional Leadership Team
3. Needs AssessmentSchool Demographics
Student Achievement/Assessment
Report Card
3A. Needs Assessment – Students
Grades Offered
Enrollment
Indicators
Selected Populations
Technology
Plans of High School Graduates
Graduation Rate
Student/Teacher Ratio
3B. Teacher Data Staffing
Data by Race, Ethnicity and Gender
3C. MCAS ResultsPercent of Students at Each Performance Level
Item by Item Results (by grade/subject
MCAS Results by Subgroup
Participation Report
High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
ELA and Math Quarterlies
3D. Student Achievement/AccountabilityAdequate Yearly Progress Report
2008-09 NCLB Report Card
Adequate Yearly Progress
3E. Organization of School Year and DaySample Student Schedule
3F. Curriculum and InstructionMathematics
English Language Arts
Three tier Model
3G. Professional Development PlanSchool Professional Development Workshops
3H. Family and Community Involvement Parent Teacher Conference Schedule
Family Events
Quarterly Newsletter
Teacher Webpages
ConnectED
4. Summarize/PrioritizeSummarize Program’s Strengths and Weaknesses
Prioritize Needs
5. GMS School Vision (WIP)
Program Goals
6. School Improvement Plan Theme 1: Students Learning/Curriculum and Instruction
Theme 1A: Response to MCAS
Theme 2: Teacher Learning /Professional Development
Theme 3: School and Community Involvement
Theme 4: Planning and Support Systems
7. PartnershipsCommunity and Professional Partnerships
Coordination and Integration of Federal, State and Local Services and Programs
1. GMS Schoolwide Plan
School Mission and Vision
Ten Essential Components of a School Wide Plan
2. School-wide Planning Teams
Patricia Massa - Principal
Monica Caporale – Asst. Principal
Karin Stolle - Mathematics
Thavary Ung - Parent
Donna Grieco - Technology
Stacey Livote – Special Education
Nichole Ferrante - Mathematics
Julie Venditti – Guidance
Laura Johnson - Science
Pia Dandiya - Mathematics
Michael Rubino - Mathematics
Susan Lanza - English Language Arts
Christine Gray -English Language Arts
Megan Bird – Citizen School
Katie Burt - Science Andrea Dreeszen - Science
School Improvement Council Members
Leadership Teams
Curriculum and Instruction Parent Involvement School Culture Physical Plant
Curriculum and Instruction Team Members
Administrative Team Matt Costa Katie Burt Donna Grieco AnnMarie Serighelli Karin Stolle Megan Bird
Parent Involvement Team Members
Administrative Team Julie Venditti Christine Gray Stacey Livote Megan Bird Susan Lanza Thavary Ung
School Culture Team Members Administrative Team Julie Venditti Lisa Devine Pia Dandiya Laura Johnson Karin Stolle Nichole Ferrante Michael Rubino~ Community Service
Andrea Dreeszen~ Community Service
Physical Plant Team Members
Administrative Team Katie Burt Donna Grieco Megan Bird
Patricia Massa – Principal Monica Caporale - Asst. Principal
Matthew Costa – Mathematics Nichole Ferrante – Mathematics
Julie Venditti – Guidance Susan Lanza – English Language Arts
Megan Bird – Citizen School Stacey Livote – Special Education
ELT Instructional
Leadership Team
3. Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Collect and Analyze School Demographics
Student Achievement and Assessment
Report Card
SIMS
Needs Assessment Procedure Performance Improvement Mapping (PIMS)
Process to analyze yearly English Language Arts and Mathematics MCAS data
(see next two slides) Analysis of District Quarterly/Common
Assessments to inform ELA, Math, History and Science instruction
DESE ELA and Math Performance Agreement s for Expanded Learning Time School
(see slide #15) Parent/Student/Staff /Teacher Surveys
(WIP- implementation June 2010)
Summary Sheet for Questions below the State Average
As you look at the questions where our students performed below the state average, what trends or similarities do you see in some or most of the questions?
1.) 2.)
3.) 4.)
Class or grade-level strategy that will be implemented to address this trend.
School-wide strategies that are suggested to address this trend.
Action Plan
MCAS Question Item Analysis
Question #
MC
SA
OR
% Correct
GMS _______
State _______
Standard:
Why did students have difficulty or success answering this question (or demonstrating mastery of this standard)?
What skills and knowledge are needed to answer this question (or demonstrate mastery of this standard)?
Where and when was this standard (or mastery skill)
instructed?
How was this standard or skill instructed and
assessed?
What different strategies will you use or do you
suggest using?
How can we use this information to help all students master this standard/skill:
Adapted from MA DOE PIMS Worksheet
Complexity:
Low
Moderate
High
Rationale:
ELT Performance Agreement Template 09 25 09.doc
3A. Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Students Grades Offered
Students Enrollment
Indicators
Selected Populations Technology
Plans of High School Graduates
Graduation Rate Student/Teacher Ratio
3B. Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Teachers
Teacher Data
Staffing Data by Race, Ethnicity, Gender
MCAS Results Percent of Students at Each Performance Level
Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
MCAS Annual Comparisons
MCAS Results by Subgroup
Participation Report
High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
.
3C. Comprehensive Needs AssessmentStudent Achievement/ Assessment
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report
2008-09 NCLB Report Card
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) data for every year going back to 1998 (see next slide)
3D. Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Student Achievement/Accountability
Response to AYP status 2009-2010.doc
3E. Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Organization of School Day
DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5 DAY 6
7:15-7:30
Universal Breakfast
Universal Breakfast
Universal Breakfast
Universal Breakfast
Universal Breakfast
Universal Breakfast
7:30-7:45
Homeroom Homeroom Homeroom Homeroom Homeroom Homeroom
Per 17:48-8:48
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Per 28:51-9:51
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Per 39:54-10:54
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Lunch10:57-11:27
Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch Lunch
Per 411:30-12:30
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Core Subject
Per 512:33-1:33
Theme/Technology
Theme/Technology
Theme/Technology
Theme/Technology
Theme/Technology
Theme/Technology
Snack1:36-1:46
Snack Snack Snack Snack Snack Snack
Per 61:49-2:49
Enrichment*
Enrichment Enrichment Enrichment Enrichment Math League
Per 72:52-3:57
Elective/Strategy** (depending on student need)
Elective/Strategy*
Elective/Strategy*
Elective/Strategy*
Elective/Strategy*
Elective/Strategy*
Sample Student Schedule
3F. Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Curriculum and InstructionCurriculum and Instruction
Mathematics 60 minute periods Study Island Fastt Math Mathletics Math Coach Quarterly Assessments Math League Math Strategies AIM (achieving important mastery) Certified Math Tutor working with identified at-risk students
English Language Arts 60 minutes periods Common Assessments Read 180
ELA StrategiesOTHER Scientific Learning DESE STEM Grant – Green in the Middle Service Learning Grant Food and Fitness Grant
3G. Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Professional Development Data
School Professional Development WorkshopsSeptember 30, 2009Charlie Applestein “No Such Thing As A Bad Kid” Presentation (Kris Oldoni, Monica Caporale, Julie Venditti)
October 21, 2009Professional Learning Communities and Team Building
October 29, 2009 Identified Characteristics of 3-5 Best practices in our Instructional Focus
December 9, 2009Finalized 3-5 Best Practices to Support IF
January 13, 2010Curriculum Fair (All Staff Presenting)
February 10, 2010 Salem State College Adjunct Professor Salem State College will present workshops on Brain Based
Learning and Higher Order and 21st Century Thinking Strategies
March 3, 2010-same
March 31, 2010-same
April 28, 2010-TBA
May 26, 2010-TBA
June 9, 2010 Program Evaluation
3H. Comprehensive Needs Assessment Family and Community Involvement
Parent Teacher Conference September 14, 2009 Meet the TeacherNovember 18, 2009 Parent Teacher ConferenceFebruary 3, 2010 Parent Teacher Conference
Family EventsDecember 17, 2009 Citizen School Event (WOW)March Parent MCAS Night (Process of being planned)
Quarterly Newsletter Quarterly Honor Roll Breakfast Citizen Schools 6th grade newsletter Teacher Webpages ConnectED (Principal messages with pertinent school information)
4. Summarize/Prioritize
Strength ELA AYP “On Target” No status ELT
Citizen School Weakness
Math is a priority Restructuring Year 2
5. Program Goals
Program Evaluation Procedure
~ DESE ELT Site Visit Feedback
~ End of Year Evaluation of SIP by members of the Council and ILT
~ ELT program feedback provided by MASS 2020 Mentor/Liaison
~ ELT Reapplication (See next slide)
~ Parent/Student/Staff /Teacher Surveys (WIP- implementations June 2010)
~ Citizen Schools Student and Staff Survey
~ Abt Associates (DESE sponsored) Survey and Focus Group Results
Garfield Middle School 09-10 ELT Reapplication.doc
6. School Improvement Plan
GMS School
2009-2010
SIP - Theme 1 Students Learning/Curriculum and Instruction
In order for our students to reach their potential and strive towards achieving the high expectations set forth by the Revere Public School System and the Garfield Middle School; we provide to our students the tools that they need to achieve their goals. We accomplish this mission by exposing our students to a wide array of programs, initiatives opportunities and state of the art technology that will both foster and encourage student achievement and success.
Theme 1
Theme 1A Response to MCAS
In response to MCAS scores in specific areas and AYP concerns scores, we are identifying significant areas in need of improvement in our curricula that are negatively impacting our MCAS scores, especially in regard to the many subgroups that we serve. We are in the process of developing and implementing various programs, initiatives and incentives that we hope will in turn improve instruction, teaching and learning by better aligning our curricula to match that of the state’s frameworks. These changes will provide opportunities to teachers that will aid in improving instruction for all.
Theme 1A
SIP - Theme 2Teacher Learning/Professional Development
As educators, we realize that in order to effectively teach and challenge our students; we need to continue learning and challenge ourselves. In order to continue to improve instructional practices, strategies, approaches and techniques; it is not only necessary and required, but imperative that all staff actively participate in the professional development process
Theme 2
SIP - Theme 3School and Community Involvement
The Garfield Middle School and the surrounding community are working together to create a partnership of thinkers and learners. Through various programs, clubs, initiatives, opportunities and resources we expose and instill in our students the qualities and ideals of good citizenship and character.
Theme 3
SIP - Theme 4Planning and SupportSystems
The Garfield Middle School embraces the belief that for students to reach their potential they need to know that they are in a safe and healthy environment. It is the goal the entire Garfield School (both Middle and Elementary) to ensure that our building is kept clean, safe and healthy for all.
Theme 4
7. Partnerships
Citizens School Revere Cares Salem State College Mass 2020 Abt Associates Mass General Hospital (webpage being developed)
Teach for America Big Sister MA Executive Office of Transportation - Safe
Routes to School Grant (Spring 2010)
Eurovest
North Shore Mental Health Counseling Agency Center for Family Development