Gardiner short briefing package

28
Gardiner East Gardiner Expressway East & Lake Shore Boulevard Reconfiguration Environmental Assessment & Urban Design Study 1

description

Gardiner East briefing presentation

Transcript of Gardiner short briefing package

Page 2: Gardiner   short briefing package

What area are we studying?

2

Page 3: Gardiner   short briefing package

Gardiner East Passes Through

Five Emerging Neighborhoods

3

2.4km

2.4km - Gardiner Expressway East Elevated Structure

e.g. King to Bloor

4.2km – Lake Shore Blvd E (Yonge to Leslie)

e.g. Ossington to Jarvis

LowerYonge East Bayfront

Keating Port Lands

South Riverdale

Page 4: Gardiner   short briefing package

Case Studies

4

• A number of cities (e.g. New York, San Francisco, Seoul) have removed urban expressways with positive neighborhood and real estate benefits

• Remove options are typically around $100 million/ kmremove

replace

improve

maintain

• A number of cities (e.g. Boston, Seattle) have elected to replace elevated expressways with below grade tunnels

• Boston replaced expressway with an street level park• Tunnel options are typically more than $1 billion/ km

• A number of cities (e.g. New York, Louisville) have invested in improved lighting and public realm to reduce impact of overhead expressways

• Costs range widely depending if structure is in need of repair

• Many cities (e.g. Buffalo, Washington) have invested in rehabilitating elevated expressways as functional single use infrastructure

• Costs range widely depending on type of construction and local conditions.

Page 5: Gardiner   short briefing package

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Equally Preferred

City Rank CDB Through HighwaysNew York 1 RemoveChicago 9 Never BuiltToronto 10 Under StudyWashington 14 MaintainLos Angeles 17 MaintainSan Francisco 18 RemoveBoston 19 ReplaceHouston 27 MaintainVancouver 28 Never BuiltDallas 32 MaintainAtlanta 33 MaintainSeattle 35 ReplaceMontréal 36 Under StudyMiami 40 MaintainPhiladelphia 48 Improve

Citigroup/ Economist Competitiveness Ranking (North American Cities on World List) 2013

5

Economic Competitiveness

& Downtown HighwaysEconomics

Page 6: Gardiner   short briefing package

Environment

Urban Design

Transportation +

Infrastructure

Economics

Evaluation Approach

• 4 Study Lenses• 16 Criteria Groups

• 60 Measures • Comparison of Relative Advantages & Disadvantages

for each Criteria group

Page 7: Gardiner   short briefing package

7

4 Alternative SolutionsUrban Design

Maintain Replace

Improve Remove

Lake Shore Blvd E @ Sherbourne St

Page 8: Gardiner   short briefing package
Page 9: Gardiner   short briefing package

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

1975 1981 1985 1991 1995 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Tota

l Tri

ps

AM Peak Hour Inbound to Downtown

Auto (Gardiner Westbound @ DVP) Auto (Gardiner Eastbound @ Bathurst)

Auto (All Other Routes) TTC Transit

GO Transit Walk/ Cycle

ProjectionActual

Transportation Demand Growth

9

+115,500 Total

+157,200 Total

+237,900 Total

Source: AM Peak Hour Inbound to Downtown: 1) Transportation City Cordon Count (1975-2011); 2) Transportation Model EMME2

Forecast (2011-2031); 3) 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) for Walk/Cycle Mode and Other Data;

Downtown: Defined as Bathurst to Don River and Waterfront to the rail corridor north of Bloor

Page 10: Gardiner   short briefing package

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Trip

s

Capacity Across the Don River

Auto Transit (Existing) Transit (Planned)

10

Transportation Network CapacityTransportation &Infrastructure

2031FutureTotal Demand

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Equally Preferred 10

Source: AM Peak Hour Westbound at Don River Transportation Cordon (Lake Shore to Bloor): 1) Transportation Model EMME2

Forecast (2011-2031); 2) 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) for Walk/Cycle Mode and Other Data; and 3) Employment/

Population City's Flash Forward Report (2011-2031).

Page 11: Gardiner   short briefing package

11

Downtown vs Through Trips (AM Peak Hour Eastbound)

Spadina/ York-

Bay-Yonge

3,000

54%

Jarvis/

Sherbourne

1,400

25%

DVP

900

16%

Lake Shore

350

6%

Eastbound

@ Dufferin

5,650

Per Hour

5,6502,600

1,200

Gardiner East

Study Area

Source: AM Peak Hour Survey Results (2010 Origin/ Destination Survey)

Page 12: Gardiner   short briefing package

12

Downtown vs Through Trips (AM Peak Hour Westbound)

Jarvis/ Sherbourne

500

7%

DVP

4,500 Per Hour

Lake Shore

2,900

Per Hour

Spadina/

Yonge-Bay-York

2,600

35%

To

Dufferin/427

1,550

21%

Lake Shore

700

9%

4,5001,550

Gardiner East

Study Area

Richmond

1,800

24%

2,7

00

Source: AM Peak Hour Survey Results (2010 Origin/ Destination Survey)

Page 13: Gardiner   short briefing package

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Preferred Moderate Preferred Moderate Preferred Less Preferred

B

C

Victoria Park/Finch

Union Station

Kipling/Lake Shore

Victoria Park/Kingston

Don Mills/Eglinton

A

D

13

Peak Hour Auto Travel TimesTransportation &Infrastructure

E

Actual & Projected Inbound Travel Times AM Peak Hour Average

2001 2012 2031Maintain

2031Improve

2031Replace

2031Remove

A to D 40 min 45 min 50 min 55 min 55 min 60 min

B to D 20 min 25 min 30 min 35 min 35 min 40 min

C to D 20 min 20 min 25 min 25 min 30 min 30 min

E to D 25 min 25 min 25 min 30 min 30 min 30 min

Page 14: Gardiner   short briefing package

Peak Period DelayTransportation &Infrastructure

Page 15: Gardiner   short briefing package

Over three decades, New York City transformed its West Side

Highway into a surface boulevard.

Case Study – Route 9A New York

Page 16: Gardiner   short briefing package

Growth on the West Side has outpaced the rest of New York City.

-1%

2%

4%

Rent JobsNYC MSA NYC

West Side

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

1970-1980 1980-1990 1990-2000 2000-2010

MSA San Francisco Embarcadero

Population growth by decade

Average quarter-over-quarter rent growth, 1996-2013; Job growth, 2002-2012; Vacancy, 1996-2013

0%

10%

20%

30%

19

96

3Q

19

97

3Q

19

98

3Q

19

99

3Q

20

00

3Q

20

01

3Q

20

02

3Q

20

03

3Q

20

04

3Q

20

05

3Q

20

06

3Q

20

07

3Q

20

08

3Q

20

09

3Q

20

10

3Q

20

11

3Q

20

12

3Q

20

13

3Q

West Side

Case Study – Route 9A New York

NYC MSA West SideNYC

Page 17: Gardiner   short briefing package

ConstructionTransportation &Infrastructure

Replace (8 years)• Close Gardiner/ Lake Shore corridor

for majority of construction (8yrs)• Construct new structureRemove (6 years)• Pre-build on/off ramps and re-align

Lake Shore (Cherry and DVP)• Close 3 Gardiner travel lanes in two

stages and demolish (3yrs)• Complete Lake Shore between Jarvis

and Cherry

Yon

ge

Jarv

is

She

rbo

urn

e

Par

liam

en

t

Ch

err

y

DV

P

Car

law

Maintain (6 years)• Close 2 Gardiner travel lanes (6yrs)• Demolish and rebuild deck in segments• Closure of Lake Shore travel lanes at

timesImprove (6 years)• Close 2 Gardiner travel lanes (6yrs)• Demolish and rebuild deck in segments • Closure of Lake Shore travel lanes at

times

17

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Preferred Preferred Less Preferred Moderate Preferred

Page 18: Gardiner   short briefing package

• The intersections of LSB/ Jarvis; LSB/ Sherbourneand LSB/Don Roadway are among the top 20% in the city of intersections on major urban arterial roads in terms of number of collisions between 2007 and 2011.

18

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Less Preferred Moderate Preferred Preferred Preferred

SafetyTransportation &Infrastructure

Road Segments (along Lake Shore) Collisions2007-2011

Yonge to Jarvis 86

Jarvis to Sherbourne 128

Don Rd to Carlaw 82

Intersections (along Lake Shore) Collisions2007-2011

Jarvis 278

Sherbourne 92

Don Rd 149

Carlaw 161

Page 19: Gardiner   short briefing package

• Currently about 10 turning restrictions in the corridor

• Improve alternative will reduce the number of restricted turns to between 3 and 6

• Replace and Remove will have no or limited turning restrictions thus improving local access to/ from the downtown core

19

Turning RestrictionsTransportation &Infrastructure

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Less Preferred Moderate Preferred Preferred

Lake Shore Blvd E @ Sherbourne St

Page 20: Gardiner   short briefing package

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Less Preferred Moderate Preferred Preferred Preferred

Pedestrian CrossingsTransportation &Infrastructure

20

• Existing crossing are interrupted by free-turn lanes

• Improve eliminates most free-turn lanes and regularizes intersections

• Remove has a shorter crosswalk walking distance than University Ave (46m)

• Crossing distances vary widely amongst all the options, while the majority of pedestrians can cross the corridor in one stage in all four alternatives

Lake Shore E @ Cherry St

University Avenue @ Queen St

Crossing Distances

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

35-45.4m 35-42.4m 22.5m 38m

Page 21: Gardiner   short briefing package

Maintain, Improve, Replace

• 4-5 stories of garages and garage entrances, limited retail opportunities, few pedestrians

Remove

• Ground floor retail, shops, office/ residential lobbies, patios and greater pedestrian activity

• Remove creates the most opportunities for active pedestrian spaces such as outdoor patios

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Less Preferred Less Preferred Less Preferred Preferred

Street FrontsEconomics

21

Spadina Ave @ Richmond St W

East of Bay St along Lake Shore E

Page 22: Gardiner   short briefing package

Consistency with Official PlanUrban Design

22

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Less Preferred Less Preferred Moderate Preferred Preferred

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Removing Barriers Least Least Somewhat Most

Building a Network of Spectacular Waterfront Parks and Public Spaces

Least Least Somewhat Most

Promoting a Clean and Green Environment

Least Least Somewhat Most

Creating Dynamic and Diverse New Communities

Least Least Least Most

Central Waterfront Secondary Plan

Principles

Page 23: Gardiner   short briefing package

23

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Less Preferred Moderate Preferred Moderate Preferred Preferred

Social & HealthEnvironment

Mai

nta

in

Imp

rove

Re

pla

ce

Re

mo

ve

Noise Level (Decibles dBA)

69-78 68-78 67-77 61-70

Local Air Quality (NOx emissions t/yr)

336 335 313 300

Local AQ (PM2.5 emissions t/yr )

32.5 30 29 27.4

Regional Air Quality Burden

0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.24%

Regional Greenhouse Gas (GHGs)

0.28% to 0.29% 0.24%

View from South Riverdale

Looking WestSource: Air Quality, Noise and Greenhouse Gas Modeling for

Gardiner East EA Project

Page 24: Gardiner   short briefing package

$0

$250

$500

$750

$1,000

$1,250

$1,500

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Lifecycle Cost (Capital, Operations & Maintenance)

Total Capital Cost Estimate (NPV) Total Operations & Maintenance Cost Estimate (NPV)

$0

$250

$500

$750

$1,000

$1,250

$1,500

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Lifecycle Cost (Capital, Operations & Maintenance)

Capital Cost Estimate Operations & Maintenance Cost Estimate

$70

$50

$20$90

Maintain* Improve Replace Remove

Mill

ion

s o

f $

’s

$300M (+/- 10%)

$360M (+/- 20%)

$700M (+/- 20%)

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Moderate Preferred Moderate Preferred Less Preferred Preferred

Costs (100 Year Lifecycle)Economics

24

$410 $970

$455

$420

$330

$1,390M (+/- 20%)

$470M (+/- 20%)

$140

$870M (+/- 10%)

$865M (+/- 20%)

*Capital cost for Maintain includes: 1) $215M for Jarvis to DVP Ramps; 2) $105M for Transitions (Yonge to Jarvis & DVP Ramps); 3) $25M for Don Mouth Naturalization at Lake Shore and Don River Bridge

$240M (+/- 20%)

Net Present Value 2013$’sCapital Estimate Capital EstimateOperations & Maintenance Estimate Operations & Maintenance Estimate

$128

$90

$215 $290

$70

$525

$650

$50

$220$20

$130$82

Page 25: Gardiner   short briefing package

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

Less Preferred Less Preferred Moderate Preferred Preferred

Revenues from Public Land SalesEconomics

Maintain Improve Replace Remove

New Development Parcels (Acres) 0 0 5 10

New Development Area (Gross Square Feet) 0 0 1,900,000 2,800,000

New Revenue from Public Land Sales (NPV) 0 $2M $65-70M $80-90M

New Revenue from Public Land Sales (2013$) 0 $3M $150-160M $220-$240M

Page 26: Gardiner   short briefing package

26

Preliminary Evaluation ResultsStudy Lens/ Criteria Group Summary MAINTAIN IMPROVE REPLACE REMOVE

TRA

NSP

OR

TATI

ON

&

INFR

AST

RU

CTU

RE

Automobiles

Transit

Pedestrians

Cycling

Movement of Goods

Safety

Constructability

UR

BA

N

DES

IGN

Planning

Public Realm

Built Form

ENV

IRO

NM

ENT

Social & Health

Natural Environment

Cultural Resources

ECO

NO

MIC

S Regional Economics

Local Economics

Direct Cost and Benefit

Preferred Moderately Preferred Least Preferred

Page 27: Gardiner   short briefing package

Hybrid Proposal

Page 28: Gardiner   short briefing package

Consult on Alternative Solutions

Next Steps …

Public Meeting Oct 16, 2013

Mar 4, 2014

2014/ 2015

MOE Review & Decision 2015/ 2016 Onwards

2015

Evaluate & Consult on Four Alternative Solutions

Public Works & Infrastructure Committee Review

Develop & Consult on Alternative Designs

City Council Approval & Submission to MOE

Public Meeting Jun 13, 2013

2009Approved EA Terms of Reference

Public Meeting Feb 6, 2014

Further Study & Stakeholder Consultation on Congestion, Goods Movement, Hybrid Alternative Summer & Fall 2014