GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
-
Upload
sumitsrivastav -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
1/72
Standard Costs4/26/04
Chapter 10
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
2/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Standard Costs
StandardCosts are
Predetermined.
Used for planning labor, materialand overhead requirements.
Benchmarks formeasuring performance.
Used to simplify theaccounting system.
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
3/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Standard Costs
DirectMaterial
Managers focus on quantities and coststhat differ from standards by a significant amount,a practice known as management by exception.
Type of Product Cost
Amount
DirectLabor Manufactur
ingOverhead
Standard
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
4/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Accountants, engineers, personnel
administrators, and production managers
combine efforts to set standards based onexperience and expectations.
Setting Standard Costs
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
5/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Setting Standard Costs
Should we usepractical standardsorideal standards?
Engineer Managerial
Accountant
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
6/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Setting Standard Costs
Practical standards should beset at levels that are currentlyattainable with reasonable and
efficient effort.
Production
manager
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
7/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Setting Standard Costs
I agree. Ideal standards,based on perfection,are unattainable and
discourage mostemployees.
Human Resources
Manager
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
8/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Note
The argument that ideal standards arediscouraging has been persuasive for manyyears. So normal defects and waste werebuilt into the standards.
In recent years, TQM and other initiativeshave sought to eliminate all defects andwaste.
Ideal standards, that allow for no waste, havebecome more popular.
The emphasis is on improvement over time, notattaining the ideal standards right now.
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
9/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Setting Direct MaterialStandards (example p. 428)
PriceStandards
Final, deliveredcost of materials,net of discounts.
QuantityStandards
Material required perspec plus allowance for
waste, etc.
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
10/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Setting Direct LaborStandards (example p. 429)
RateStandards
Use wage surveysand labor contracts,
include fringes.
TimeStandards
Time required tocomplete a unit of
product, use time and
motion study
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
11/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Setting Variable OverheadStandards (example p. 430)
RateStandards
The rate is thevariable portion of the
predetermined overhead
rate.
ActivityStandards
The activity is thebase used to apply
overhead to units of
product
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
12/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Standard Cost Card Variable Production Cost
A standard cost card for one unit ofproduct might look like this:
A A x B
Standard Standard Standard
Quantity Pr ice Cost
Inputs or Hours or Rate per Unit
Direct materials 3.0 lbs. 4.00$ per lb. 12.00$
Direct labor 2.5 hours 14.00 per hour 35.00
Variable mfg. overhead 2.5 hours 3.00 per hour 7.50
Total standard unit cost 54.50$
B
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
13/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Standard Cost Variances
Co
st
Standard
Thi
s vari
ancei
s unfavorablebecause the actual costexceeds the standard cost.
A standard cost variance is the amount by whichan actual cost differs from the standard cost.
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
14/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Standard Cost Variances
Mr.D: I see thatthere is anunfavorable
variance.
But why arevariances
important to me?
First, they point to causes ofproblems and directions
for improvement.
Second, they trigger
investigations in departmentshaving responsibility
for incurring the costs.
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
15/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Standard Cost Variances
Standard Cost Variances
Price Variance
The difference betweenthe actual price and the
standard price
Quantity Variance
The difference betweenthe actual quantity andthe standard quantity
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
16/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A General Model for VarianceAnalysis (Exhibit 10-3)
Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity
Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price
Price Variance Quantity Variance
Standard price is the amount that shouldhave been paid for the resources acquired.
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
17/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Price Variance Quantity Variance
Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity
Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price
A General Model for VarianceAnalysis
Standard quantity is the quantity allowed forthe actual good produced.
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
18/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A General Model for VarianceAnalysis
AQ(AP - SP) SP(AQ - SQ)
AQ = Actual Quantity SP = Standard PriceAP = Actual Price SQ = Standard Quantity
Price Variance Quantity Variance
Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity
Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
19/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Favorable/UnfavorableVariances
IfAQ(AP-SP) = positive = unfavorable
(actual is greater than standard)
IfAQ(AP-SP) = negative = favorable
(actual is less than standard)
If SP
(A
Q-SQ) = positive = unfavorableIf SP(AQ-SQ) = negative = favorable
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
20/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Standard Costs
Lets use the general modelto calculate all standard cost
vari
ances, starti
ng wi
thdirect material.
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
21/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hanson Inc. has the following direct materialstandard to manufacture one Zippy:
1.5 pounds per Zippy at $4.00 per pound
Last week 1,700 pounds of material werepurchased and used to make 1,000 Zippies.
The material cost a total of $6,630.
Material VariancesExample
Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
22/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
What is the actual price per pound
paid for the material?a. $4.00 per pound.
b. $4.10 per pound.
c. $3.90 per pound.d. $6.63 per pound.
Quick Check Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
23/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
What is the actual price per pound
paid for the material?a. $4.00 per pound.
b. $4.10 per pound.
c. $3.90 per pound.d. $6.63 per pound.
AP = $6,630 1,700 lbs.
AP = $3.90 per lb.
Quick Check Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
24/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hansons material price variance (MPV)
for the week was:a. $170 unfavorable.
b. $170 favorable.
c. $800 unfavorable.d. $800 favorable.
Quick Check Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
25/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hansons material price variance (MPV)
for the week was:a. $170 unfavorable.
b. $170 favorable.
c. $800 unfavorable.d. $800 favorable.
MPV = AQ(AP - SP)MPV = 1,700 lbs. ($3.90 - 4.00)MPV = $170 Favorable
Quick Check Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
26/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The standard quantity of material that
should have been used to produce1,000 Zippies is:
a. 1,700 pounds.
b. 1,500 pounds.
c. 2,550 pounds.
d. 2,000 pounds.
Quick Check Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
27/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The standard quantity of material that
should have been used to produce1,000 Zippies is:
a. 1,700 pounds.
b. 1,500 pounds.
c. 2,550 pounds.
d. 2,000 pounds.SQ = 1,000 units 1.5 lbs per unitSQ = 1,500 lbs
Quick Check Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
28/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Quick Check
Hansons material quantity variance (MQV)
for the week was:a. $170 unfavorable.
b. $170 favorable.
c. $800 unfavorable.d. $800 favorable.
Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
29/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hansons material quantity variance (MQV)
for the week was:a. $170 unfavorable.
b. $170 favorable.
c. $800 unfavorable.d. $800 favorable.MQV = SP(AQ - SQ)MQV = $4.00(1,700 lbs - 1,500 lbs)MQV = $800 unfavorable
Quick Check Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
30/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
1,700 lbs. 1,700 lbs. 1,500 lbs.
$3.90 per lb. $4.00 per lb. $4.00 per lb.
= $6,630 = $ 6,800 = $6,000
Price variance$170 favorable
Quantity variance$800 unfavorable
Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity
Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price
Material VariancesSummary
Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
31/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Material Variances
Hanson purchased andused 1,700 pounds.
How are the variancescomputed if the amountpurchased differs from
the amount used?
The price variance iscomputed on the entire
quantity purchased.The quantity varianceis computed only on
the quantity used.
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
32/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hanson Inc. has the following materialstandard to manufacture one Zippy:
1.5 pounds per Zippy at $4.00 per pound
Last week 2,800 pounds of material werepurchased at a total cost of $10,920, and
1,700 pounds were used to make 1,000Zippies.
Material VariancesContinued
Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
33/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Actual Quantity Actual QuantityPurchased Purchased
Actual Price Standard Price
2,800 lbs. 2,800 lbs.
$3.90 per lb. $4.00 per lb.
= $10,920 = $11,200
Price variance$280 favorable
Price variance increasesbecause quantity
purchased increases.
ZippyMaterial Variances
Continued
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
34/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Actual QuantityUsed Standard Quantity
Standard Price Standard Price
1,700 lbs. 1,500 lbs.
$4.00 per lb. $4.00 per lb.
= $6,800 = $6,000
Quantity variance$800 unfavorable
Quantity variance isunchanged becauseactual and standard
quantities are unchanged.
Material VariancesContinued
Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
35/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Responsibility for MaterialVariances
I am not responsible forthis unfavorable material
quantity variance.You purchased cheap
material, so my peoplehad to use more of it.
You used too much material
because of poorly trainedworkers and poorlymaintained equipment.
Also, your poor schedulingsometimes requires me to
rush order material at ahigher price, causing
unfavorable price variances.
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
36/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Material Price VarianceCauses
Odd lot sizes
Price discounts
Rush orders
Lower quality materials
Special pricingTransportation method
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
37/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Material Quantity VarianceCauses
Faulty/poorly maintained machinery
Poor quality material
Untrained workers
New workers
P
oor supervision
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
38/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Standard Costs Direct Labor
Now lets calculatestandard cost
variances fordirect labor.
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
39/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Note
Materials variances:
Material price variance
MPV = AQ (AP - SP)
Material quantity variance MQV = SP (AQ - SQ)
Labor variances:
Labor rate variance
LRV = AH (AR - SR)
Labor efficiency variance
LEV = SR (AH - SH)
Actual hours
Actual rate
Standard rate
Standard hours allowedfor the actual good output
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
40/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hanson Inc. has the following direct laborstandard to manufacture one Zippy:
1.5 standard hours perZippy at $12.00 perdirect labor hour
Last week 1,550 direct labor hours wereworked at a total labor cost of $18,910to make 1,000 Zippies.
Labor Variances Example Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
41/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
What was Hansons actual rate (AR)for labor for the week?
a. $12.20 per hour.
b. $12.00 per hour.
c. $11.80 per hour.
d. $11.60 per hour.
Quick Check Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
42/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
What was Hansons actual rate (AR)for labor for the week?
a. $12.20 per hour.
b. $12.00 per hour.
c. $11.80 per hour.
d. $11.60 per hour.
Quick Check
AR = $18,910 1,550 hoursAR = $12.20 per hour
Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
43/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hansons labor rate variance (LRV) forthe week was:
a. $310 unfavorable.
b. $310 favorable.
c. $300 unfavorable.
d. $300 favorable.
Quick Check Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
44/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hansons labor rate variance (LRV) forthe week was:
a. $310 unfavorable.
b. $310 favorable.
c. $300 unfavorable.
d. $300 favorable.
Quick Check
LRV = AH(AR - SR)
LRV = 1,550 hrs($12.20 - $12.00)LRV = $310 unfavorable
Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
45/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The standard hours (SH) of labor thatshould have been worked to produce
1,000 Zippies is:a. 1,550 hours.
b. 1,500 hours.
c. 1,700 hours.d. 1,800 hours.
Quick Check Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
46/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The standard hours (SH) of labor thatshould have been worked to produce
1,000 Zippies is:a. 1,550 hours.
b. 1,500 hours.
c. 1,700 hours.d. 1,800 hours.
Quick Check
SH = 1,000 units 1.5 hours per unitSH = 1,500 hours
Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
47/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hansons labor efficiency variance (LEV)for the week was:
a. $590 unfavorable.
b. $590 favorable.
c. $600 unfavorable.
d. $600 favorable.
Quick Check Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
48/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hansons labor efficiency variance (LEV)for the week was:
a. $590 unfavorable.
b. $590 favorable.
c. $600 unfavorable.
d. $600 favorable.
Quick Check
LEV = SR(AH - SH)LEV = $12.00(1,550 hrs - 1,500 hrs)LEV = $600 unfavorable
Zippy
L b V i
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
49/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours
Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
Labor VariancesSummary
Rate variance$310 unfavorable
Efficiency variance$600 unfavorable
1,550 hours 1,550 hours 1,500 hours
$12.20 per hour $12.00 per hour $12.00 per hour
= $18,910 = $18,600 = $18,000
Zippy
L b R t V i
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
50/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
LaborRate Variance A Closer Look
Production managers who make work assignmentsare generally responsible for rate variances.
OvertimePremium
Wageincrease
Using highly paid skilled workers toperform unskilled tasks results in an
unfavorable rate variance.
Turnover of
Employees
L b Effi i V i
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
51/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Labor Efficiency Variance A Closer Look
UnfavorableEfficiency
Variance
Poorsupervisionof workers
Poorlymaintainedequipment
Poorlytrainedworkers
Poorquality
materials
Insufficientdemand for product
R ibilit f
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
52/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Responsibility forLabor Variances
Production Manager
Poorly trained/motivated workers
Poorly maintained equipment
Poor supervision of workers
Inaccurate standards
Purchasing Manager
Poor quality of materials
St d d C t V i bl
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
53/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Standard Costs VariableManufacturing Overhead
Now lets calculatestandard cost
vari
ances for thelast of the variableproduction costs
variable
manufacturingoverhead.
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
54/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Note
Labor variances:
Labor rate variance
LRV = AH (AR - SR)
Labor efficiency variance LEV = SR (AH - SH)
Variable overhead variances:
Variable overhead spending variance
VOSV = AH (AR - SR) Variable overhead efficiency variance
VOEV = SR (AH SH)
A
ctual hours ofthe allocationbase
Actual variable
overhead rateStandardvariableoverhead rate
Standard hours allowed forthe actual good output
V i bl M f t i
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
55/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Variable ManufacturingOverhead Example
Hanson Inc. has the following variablemanufacturing overhead standard:
1.5 standard hours per Zippy at a POHR of$3.00 per direct labor hour
Last week, 1,550 direct labor hours wereworked to make 1,000 Zippies, and a total
cost of $5,115 was incurred for variablemanufacturing overhead. OH cost per hour is$5,115/1,550 = $3.30
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
56/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hansons spending variance (VOSV) forvariable manufacturing overhead for
the week was:a. $465 unfavorable.
b. $400 favorable.
c. $335 unfavorable.d. $300 favorable.
Quick Check Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
57/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hansons spending variance (VOSV) forvariable manufacturing overhead for
the week was:a. $465 unfavorable.
b. $400 favorable.
c. $335 unfavorable.d. $300 favorable.
Quick Check
SV = AH(AR - SR)
SV = 1,550 hrs($3.30 - $3.00)SV = $465 unfavorable
Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
58/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hansons efficiency variance (VOEV) forvariable manufacturing overhead for the
week was:a. $435 unfavorable.
b. $435 favorable.
c. $150 unfavorable.d. $150 favorable.
Quick Check Zippy
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
59/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hansons efficiency variance (VOEV) forvariable manufacturing overhead for the
week was:a. $435 unfavorable.
b. $435 favorable.
c. $150 unfavorable.d. $150 favorable.
Quick Check
EV = SR(AH - SH)EV = $3.00(1,550 hrs - 1,500 hrs)EV = $150 unfavorable
1,000 units 1.5 hrs per unit
Zippy
Variable Manufacturing
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
60/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Spending variance$465 unfavorable
Efficiency variance$150 unfavorable
1,550 hours 1,550 hours 1,500 hours
$3.30 per hour $3.00 per hour $3.00 per hour
= $5,115 = $4,650 = $4,500
Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours
Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate
Variable ManufacturingOverhead Variances
Zippy
Variable Manufacturing Overhead
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
61/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Variable Manufacturing OverheadVariances Causes
Timing of overhead spending
Changes in costs of overhead items
Difference between actual and standardallocation base activity
Spent more than what was budgeted
Variance Analysis and
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
62/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Variance Analysis andManagement by Exception
How do I know whichvariances toinvestigate?
Larger variances, in
dollar amount or asa percentage of the
standard, areinvestigated first.
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
63/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Advantages of Standard Costs
Management byexception
Improved cost controland performance
evaluation
Better Informationfor planning anddecision making
Possible reductionsin production costs
Advantages
Simplify
BookkeepingResponsibility
Accounting
Disadvantages of
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
64/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
PotentialProblems
Emphasis onnegative may
impact morale.
Emphasizing standardsmay exclude other
important objectives.
Favorable variancesmay be
misinterpreted.
Continuousimprovementmay be moreimportant than
meeting standards.
Standard costreports may
not be timely.
Incentives to buildInventories, to
absorb
excess overhead
Disadvantages ofStandard Costs
Delivery Performance
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
65/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Delivery PerformanceMeasures
Delivery time cycle time from when an orderis received from a customer to when it is
shippedManufacturing cycle time (throughput time) time required to turn raw materials intocompleted products
Objective is to reduce/eliminate non-valueadded activities such as waiting, inspection,move, rework, test and queue time
Delivery Performance
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
66/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
What time is the only value-added time?
Delivery PerformanceMeasures
Wait TimeP
rocess Time + Inspection Time+ Move Time + Queue Time
Delivery Cycle Time
OrderReceived
ProductionStarted
GoodsShipped
Throughput Time
Delivery Performance
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
67/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Delivery PerformanceMeasures
ManufacturingCycle
Efficiency
Value-added time
Manufacturing cycle time=
Wait TimeProcess Time + Inspection Time
+ Move Time + Queue Time
Delivery Cycle Time
OrderReceived
ProductionStarted
GoodsShipped
Throughput Time
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
68/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Quick Check
A TQM team at Narton Corp has recorded thefollowing average times for production:
Wait 3.0 days Move 0.5 days
Inspection 0.4 days Queue 9.3 daysProcess 0.2 days
What is the throughput time?
a. 10.4 days
b. 0.2 days
c. 4.1 days
d. 13.4 days
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
69/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A TQM team at Narton Corp has recorded thefollowing average times for production:
Wait 3.0 days Move 0.5 days
Inspection 0.4 days Queue 9.3 daysProcess 0.2 days
What is the throughput time?
a. 10.4 days
b. 0.2 days
c. 4.1 days
d. 13.4 days
Quick Check
Throughput time = Process + Inspection + Move + Queue= 0.2 days + 0.4 days + 0.5 days + 9.3 days= 10.4 days
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
70/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Quick Check
A TQM team at Narton Corp has recorded thefollowing average times for production:
Wait 3.0 days Move 0.5 days
Inspection 0.4 days Queue 9.3 daysProcess 0.2 days
What is the Manufacturing Cycle Efficiency?
a. 50.0%
b. 1.9%
c. 52.0%
d. 5.1%
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
71/72
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A TQM team at Narton Corp has recorded thefollowing average times for production:
Wait 3.0 days Move 0.5 days
Inspection 0.4 days Queue 9.3 daysProcess 0.2 days
What is the MCE?
a. 50.0%
b. 1.9%
c. 52.0%
d. 5.1%
Quick Check
MCE = Value-added time Throughput time= Process time Throughput time= 0.2 days 10.4 days= 1.9%
-
8/3/2019 GarCh10 -- Standard Costs
72/72
End of Chapter 10