Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University

Gabriel Kotliar

Physics Department and

Center for Materials Theory

Rutgers University

ISSP-Kashiwa 2001

Tokyo 1st-5th October

THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY

RUTGERS

the Mott phenomena

Evolution of the electronic structure between the atomic limit and the band limit in an open shell situation.

The “”in between regime” is ubiquitous central them in strongly correlated systems, gives rise to interesting physics.

New insights and new techniques from the solution of the Mott transition problem within dynamical mean field of simple model Hamiltonians

Use the ideas and concepts that resulted from this development to give physical insights into real materials.

Steps taken to turn the technology developed to solve the toy models into a practical electronic structure method.


RUTGERS

Outline

Background: DMFT study of the Mott transition in a toy model. Behavior of the compressibility near the Mott transition endpoint.

DMFT as an electronic structure method. From Lda to LDA+U to LDA+ DMFT.

DMFT results for delta Pu, and some qualitative insights into the “Mott transition across the actinide series”

Fe and Ni, a new look at the classic itinerant ferromagnets


RUTGERS

Goal of the talk Describe some recent steps

taken to make DMFT into an electronic structure tool.

model Hamiltonian review see A. Georges talk in this workshop and consult reviews:

Prushke T. Jarrell M. and Freericks J. Adv. Phys. 44,187 (1995)

A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth and M. Rozenberg Rev. Mod. Phys. 68,13 (1996)]


RUTGERS

Outline:

Choice of Basis. Realistic self consistency

condition Brief Comment on Impurity

Solvers Integration with LDA. Effective

action formulation. Comparison with LDA and LDA+U

Some examples in real materials, transition metals and actinides.


RUTGERS

Acknowledgements: Collaborators, Colleagues, Support for realistic work………….

S. Lichtenstein (Nijmeigen), E Abrahams (Rutgers)

G. Biroli (Rutgers), R. Chitra (Rutgers-Jussieux), V. Udovenko (Rutgers), S. Savrasov (Rutgers-NJIT)

G. Palsson, I. Yang (Rutgers) NSF, DOE and ONR


RUTGERS

1

10

1( ) ( )

( )n nn k nk

G i ii t i

w ww m w

-

-é ùê ú= +Sê ú- + - Sê úë ûå

DMFT Impurity cavity construction: A. Georges, G. Kotliar, PRB, (1992)]

†

0 0 0

[ ] ( )[ ( , ')] ( ')o o o oS Go c Go c U n nb b b

s st t t t ¯= +òò ò

† †

, ,

( )( )ij ij i j j i i ii j i

t c c c c U n n

0

†( )( ) ( ) ( )L n o n o n S GG i c i c iw w w=- á ñ

10 ( ) ( )n n nG i i iw w m w- = + - D

0

1 † 10 0 ( )( )[ ] ( ) [ ( ) ( ) ]n n n n S Gi G G i c i c ia bw w w w- -S = + á ñ

Weiss field


RUTGERS

Good method to study the Mott phenomena

Evolution of the electronic structure between the atomic limit and the band limit. Basic solid state problem. Solved by band theory when the atoms have a closed shell. Mott’s problem: Open shell situation.

The “”in between regime” is ubiquitous central them in strongly correlated systems. Strategy, look electronic structure problems where this physics is absolutely essential , Fe, Ni, Pu …………….


RUTGERS

Elements of the Dynamical Mean Field Construction and C-DMFT.

Definition of the local degrees of freedom

Expression of the Weiss field in terms of the local variables (I.e. the self consistency condition)

Expression of the lattice self energy in terms of the cluster self energy.


RUTGERS

Cellular DMFT : Basis selection. Exact spectra is basis independent DMFT results are not.


RUTGERS

Lattice action


RUTGERS

Elimination of the medium variables


RUTGERS

Determination of the effective medium.


RUTGERS

Connection between cluster and lattice self energy.

The estimation of the lattice self energy in terms of the cluster energy

has to be done using additional information Ex. Translation invariance

•C-DMFT is manifestly causal: causal impurity solvers result in causal self energies and Green functions (GK S. Savrasov G. Palsson and G. Biroli)•Improved estimators for the lattice self energy are available (Biroli and Kotliar)•In simple cases C-DMFT converges faster than other causal cluster schemes.


RUTGERS

Convergence of CDMFT, test in a soluble problem (G. Biroli and G. Kotliar)


RUTGERS

Realistic DMFT self consistency loop

( )k LMTOt H k E® -LMTO

LL LH

HL HH

H HH

H H

é ùê ú=ê úë û

ki i Ow w®

10 niG i Ow e- = + - D

0 0

0 HH

é ùê úS =ê úSë û

0 0

0 HH

é ùê úD=ê úDë û

0

1 †0 0 ( )( )[ ] ( ) [ ( ) ( )HH n n n n S Gi G G i c i c ia bw w w w-S = + á ñ

110

1( ) ( )

( ) ( ) HH

LMTO HH

n nn k nk

G i ii O H k E i

w ww w

--é ùê ú= +Sê ú- - - Sê úë ûå


RUTGERS

Realistic implementation of the self consistency condition

110

1( ) ( )

( ) ( ) HH

LMTO HH

n nn k nk

G i ii O H k E i

w ww w


•H and S, do not commute•Need to do k sum for each frequency •DMFT implementation of Lambin Vigneron tetrahedron integration V. Anisimov, A. Poteryaev, M. Korotin, A. Anokhin and G. Kotliar, J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 35, 7359-7367 (1997). •Transport Coeff (G. Palsson V. Udovenko and G. Kotliar)


RUTGERS

Solving the DMFT equations

G0 G

I m p u r i t yS o l v e r

S .C .C .

•Wide variety of computational tools (QMC, NRG,ED….)•Semi-analytical Methods

G0 G

Im puritySo lver

S .C .C .


RUTGERS

DMFT+QMC (A. Lichtenstein, M. Rozenberg)


RUTGERS

Solving the impurity Multiorbital situation and several

atoms per unit cell considerably increase the size of the space H (of heavy electrons).

QMC scales as [N(N-1)/2]^3 N dimension of H

Fast interpolation schemes (Slave Boson at low frequency, Roth method at high frequency, + 1st mode coupling correction), match at intermediate frequencies. (Savrasov et.al 2001)


RUTGERS

Schematic DMFT phase diagram one band Hubbard model (half filling, semicircular DOS, partial frustration) Rozenberg et.al PRL (1995)


RUTGERS

Recent QMC phase diagram of the frustrated Half filled Hubbard model with semicircular DOS ( Joo and Udovenko).


RUTGERS

Case study: IPT half filled Hubbard one band (Uc1)exact = 2.1 (Exact diag, Rozenberg,

Kajueter, Kotliar PRB 1996) , (Uc1)IPT =2.4

(Uc2)exact =2.97+_.05(Projective self consistent method, Moeller Si Rozenberg Kotliar Fisher PRL 1995 ) (Uc2)IPT =3.3

(TMIT ) exact =.026+_ .004 (QMC Rozenberg Chitra and Kotliar PRL 1999), (TMIT )IPT =.5

(UMIT )exact =2.38 +- .03 (QMC Rozenberg Chitra and Kotliar PRL 1991), (UMIT )IPT =2.5

For realistic studies errors due to other sources (for example the value of U, are at least of the same order of magnitude).


RUTGERS

Compressibility near a Mott transition

Interaction driven Mott transition Brinkman Rice . ~ (Uc –U)

Doping driven Mott transition (Gutzwiller, Brinkman Rice, Slave Boson method) . is non singular

Numerical simulations T=0 QMC , . diverges

As 1/ (Furukawa and Imada)


RUTGERS

The Mott transition as a bifurcation

At different points in the phase diagram, different behaviors. vanishes at Uc2

(interaction driven Mott transition)

At zero temperature is non singular, at the doping driven Mott transition

Behavior at UMIT TMIT ?


RUTGERS

The Mott transition as a bifurcation in effective action

[ , ]G [ , ]0

G

G

2 [ , ]0cG

G G

Zero mode with S=0 and p=0, couples generically

Divergent compressibility


RUTGERS

Qualitative phase diagram in the U, T , plane (Murthy Rozenberg and Kotliar 2001)


RUTGERS

QMC calculationof n vs (Murthy Rozenberg and Kotliar 2001, 2 band model, U=3.0)


RUTGERS

QMC n vs (Murthy Rozenberg and Kotliar 2001, 2 band, low T


RUTGERS

Compresibility vs T


RUTGERS

Two Roads for calculations of the electronic structure of correlated materials

Crystal Structure +atomic positions

Correlation functions Total energies etc.

Model Hamiltonian


RUTGERS

LDA functional

2log[ / 2 ] ( ) ( )

1 ( ) ( ')( ) ( ) ' [ ]

2 | ' |

n KS KS

LDAext xc

Tr i V V r r dr

r rV r r dr drdr E

r r

w r

r rr r

- +Ñ - -

+ +-

ò

ò ò

[ ( )]LDA r

[ ( ), ( )]LDA KSr V r

Conjugate field, VKS(r)


RUTGERS

Minimize LDA functional

[ ]( )( ) ( ) '

| ' | ( )

LDAxc

KS ext

ErV r V r dr

r r r

d rrdr

= + +-ò

0*2

( ) { )[ / 2 ]

( ) ( ) n

n

ikj kj kj

n KSkj

r f tri V

r r ew

w

r e yw

y +=

+Ñ -=å å


RUTGERS

LDA+U functional

2 *log[ / 2 . ( ) ( )]

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

1 ( ) ( ')( ) ( ) ' [ ]

2 | ' |

[ ]

aR bR

n

KS abn KS

R

KS KS

i

LDAext xc

DC

R

Tr i V B r r

V r r dr B r m r dr Tr n

r rV r r dr drdr E

r r

G

w

w s fl f

r l

r rr r

- +Ñ - - - -

- - - +

+ + +-

F - F

å

åò ò

ò òå

1[ ] ( 1)

2DC G Un nF = - ( )0( ) iab

abi

n T G i ew

w+

= å

[ ( ), ( ), ]LDA U abr m r n

, KS KS ab [ ( ), ( ), V ( ), ( ), ]LDA U a br m r n r B r

1

2 ab abcd cdn U n


RUTGERS

Double counting term (Lichtenstein et.al)


RUTGERS

LDA+DMFT

The light, SP (or SPD) electrons are extended, well described by LDA

The heavy, D (or F) electrons are localized,treat by DMFT.

LDA already contains an average interaction of the heavy electrons, substract this out by shifting the heavy level (double counting term)

The U matrix can be estimated from first principles of viewed as parameters


RUTGERS

Spectral Density Functional : effective action construction (Fukuda, Valiev and Fernando , Chitra and GK).

DFT, consider the exact free energy as a functional of an external potential. Express the free energy as a functional of the density by Legendre transformation. DFT(r)]

Introduce local orbitals, R(r-R)orbitals, and local GF

G(R,R)(i ) =

The exact free energy can be expressed as a functional of the local Greens function and of the density by introducing sources for (r) and G and performing a Legendre transformation, (r),G(R,R)(i)]

' ( )* ( , ')( ) ( ')R Rdr dr r G r r i r


RUTGERS

Spectral Density Functional

The exact functional can be built in perturbation theory in the interaction (well defined diagrammatic rules )The functional can also be constructed from the atomic limit, but no explicit expression exists.

DFT is useful because good approximations to the exact density functional DFT(r)] exist, e.g. LDA, GGA

A useful approximation to the exact functional can be constructed, the DMFT +LDA functional.


RUTGERS

LDA+DMFT functional

2 *log[ / 2 ( ) ( )]

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

1 ( ) ( ')( ) ( ) ' [ ]

2 | ' |

[ ]

R R

n

n KS

KS n n

i

LDAext xc

DC

R

Tr i V r r

V r r dr Tr i G i

r rV r r dr drdr E

r r

G

a b ba

w

w c c

r w w

r rr r

- +Ñ - - S -

- S +

+ + +-

F - F

åò

ò òå

Sum of local 2PI graphs with local U matrix and local

G1

[ ] ( 1)2DC G Un nF = - ( )0( ) i

ab

abi

n T G i ew

w+

= å

KS KS ab [ ( ) ( ) G V ( ) ( ) ]LDA DMFT a br m r r B r


RUTGERS

Comments on LDA+DMFT

• Static limit of the LDA+DMFT functional , with = HF reduces to LDA+U

• Removes inconsistencies of this approach,

• Only in the orbitally ordered Hartree Fock limit, the Greens function of the heavy electrons is fully coherent

• Gives the local spectra and the total energy simultaneously, treating QP and H bands on the same footing.


RUTGERS

LDA+DMFTConnection with atomic limit

1[ ] [ ] [ ] logat atG W Tr G Tr G TrG G-F = D - D - +

10

10[ ] ( ) ( ') (( , ') ) ( ) ( ) ( )at a a abcd a b c d

ab

GS G c c U c c c c

1 10 atG G [ ] atS

atW Log e [ [ ]]atW

G G

Weiss field


RUTGERS

LDA+DMFT Self-Consistency loop

G0 G

Im puritySolver

S .C .C .

0( ) ( , , ) i

i

r T G r r i e w

w

r w+

= å

2| ( ) | ( )k xc k LMTOV H ka ac r c- Ñ + =

DMFT

U

E

0( , , )HHi

HH

i

n T G r r i e w

w

w+

= å


RUTGERS

Realistic DMFT loop

( )k LMTOt H k E® -LMTO

LL LH

HL HH

H HH

H H

é ùê ú=ê úë û

ki i Ow w®

10 niG i Ow e- = + - D

0 0

0 HH

é ùê úS =ê úSë û

0 0

0 HH

é ùê úD=ê úDë û

0

1 †0 0 ( )( )[ ] ( ) [ ( ) ( )HH n n n n S Gi G G i c i c ia bw w w w-S = + á ñ

110

1( ) ( )

( ) ( ) HH

LMTO HH

n nn k nk

G i ii O H k E i

w ww w



RUTGERS

LDA+DMFT References

V. Anisimov, A. Poteryaev, M. Korotin, A. Anokhin and G. Kotliar, J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 35, 7359-7367 (1997).

ALichtensteinandM.KatsenelsonPhys.Rev.B57,6884(1988).

S.SavrasovandG.Kotliar,funcionalformulationforfullselfconsistentimplementationofaspectraldensityfunctional(cond-mat2001)


RUTGERS

Functional Approach

The functional approach offers a direct connection to the atomic energies. One is free to add terms which vanish quadratically at the saddle point.

Allows us to study states away from the saddle points,

All the qualitative features of the phase diagram, are simple consequences of the non analytic nature of the functional.

Mott transitions and bifurcations of the functional .


RUTGERS

Functional Approach

† †,

2

2

[ , ] ( ) ( ) ( )†

† † † †

0

†

Mettalic Order Para

( )[ ] [ ]

mete

[ ]

[ , ] [ [ ] ]

( )( )

r: ( )

( ) 2 ( )[ ]( )

loc

LG imp

L f f f i i f i

imp

loc f

imp

iF T F

t

F Log df dfe

dL f f f e f Uf f f f d

d

F iT f i f i TG i

i

i

2

2

Spin Model An

[ ] [[ ]2 ]

alogy:

2LG

t

hF h Log ch h

J

G. Kotliar EPJB (1999)


RUTGERS

Case study in f electrons, Mott transition in the actinide series


RUTGERS

Pu: Anomalous thermal expansion (J. Smith LANL)


RUTGERS

Small amounts of Ga stabilize the phase


RUTGERS

Delocalization-Localization across the actinide series

o f electrons in Th Pr U Np are itinerant . From Am on they are localized. Pu is at the boundary.

o Pu has a simple cubic fcc structure,the phase which is easily stabilized over a wide region in the T,p phase diagram.

o The phase is non magnetic.o Many LDA , GGA studies ( Soderlind

et. Al 1990, Kollar et.al 1997, Boettger et.al 1998, Wills et.al. 1999) give an equilibrium volume of the an equilibrium volume of the phasephaseIs 35% lower than Is 35% lower than experimentexperiment

o This is one of the largest discrepancy ever known in DFT based calculations.


RUTGERS

Problems with LDA

o DFT in the LDA or GGA is a well established tool for the calculation of ground state properties.

o Many studies (Freeman, Koelling 1972)APW methods

o ASA and FP-LMTO Soderlind et. Al 1990, Kollar et.al 1997, Boettger et.al 1998, Wills et.al. 1999) give

o an equilibrium volume of the an equilibrium volume of the phasephaseIs 35% lower than Is 35% lower than experimentexperiment

o This is the largest discrepancy ever known in DFT based calculations.


RUTGERS

Problems with LDA

LSDA predicts magnetic long range order which is not observed experimentally (Solovyev et.al.)

If one treats the f electrons as part of the core LDA overestimates the volume by 30%

Notice however that LDA predicts correctly the volume of the phase of Pu, when full potential LMTO (Soderlind Eriksson and Wills). This is usually taken as an indication that Pu is a weakly correlated system


RUTGERS

Conventional viewpoint

Alpha Pu is a simple metal, it can be described with LDA + correction. In contrast delta Pu is strongly correlated.

Constrained LDA approach (Erickson, Wills, Balatzki, Becker). In Alpha Pu, all the 5f electrons are treated as band like, while in Delta Pu, 4 5f electrons are band-like while one 5f electron is deloclized.

Same situation in LDA + U (Savrasov andGK Bouchet et. al. [Bouchet’s talk]) .Delta Pu has U=4,Alpha Pu has U =0.


RUTGERS

Problems with the conventional viewpoint of Pu

The specific heat of delta Pu, is only twice as big as that of alpha Pu.

The susceptibility of alpha Pu is in fact larger than that of delta Pu.

The resistivity of alpha Pu is comparable to that of delta Pu.

Only the structural and elastic properties are completely different.


RUTGERS

Pu Specific Heat


RUTGERS

Anomalous ResistivityJ. Smith LANL


RUTGERS

MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY


RUTGERS

Dynamical Mean Field View of Pu(Savrasov Kotliar and Abrahams, Nature 2001)

Delta and Alpha Pu are both strongly correlated, the DMFT mean field free energy has a double well structure, for the same value of U. One where the f electron is a bit more localized (delta) than in the other (alpha).

Is the natural consequence of the model hamiltonian phase diagram once electronic structure is about to vary.

This result resolves one of the basic paradoxes in the physics of Pu.


RUTGERS

Pu: DMFT total energy vs Volume


RUTGERS

Lda vs Exp Spectra

DO

S, s

t./[e

V*c

ell]


RUTGERS

Pu Spectra DMFT(Savrasov) EXP (Arko et. Al)


RUTGERS

PU: ALPHA AND DELTA


RUTGERS

Case study Fe and Ni

Archetypical itinerant ferromagnets

LSDA predicts correct low T moment

Band picture holds at low T Main challenge, finite T

properties (Lichtenstein’s talk).


RUTGERS

Iron and Nickel: crossover to a real space picture at high T (Lichtenstein, Katsnelson and GK)


RUTGERS

However not everything in low T phase is OK as far as LDA goes..

Magnetic anisotropy puzzle. LDA predicts the incorrect easy axis for Nickel .(instead of 111)

LDA Fermi surface has features which are not seen in DeHaas Van Alphen ( Lonzarich)

Use LDA+ U to tackle these refined issues, (WE cannot be resolved with DMFT, compare parameters with Lichtenstein’s )


RUTGERS

Some Earlier Work:Kondorskii and E Straube Sov Phys.

JETP 36, 188 (1973)

G. H Dallderop P J Kelly M Schuurmans Phys. Rev. B 41, 11919 (1990)

Trygg, Johansson Eriksson and Wills Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 2871 (1995) Schneider M Erickson and Jansen J. Appl Phys. 81 3869 (1997)

I Solovyev, Lichenstein Terakura Phys. Rev. Lett 80, 5758 (LDA+U +SO Coupling)…….

Present work : Imseok Yang, S Savrasov and GK


RUTGERS

Origin of Magnetic Anisotropy

Spin orbit coupling L.S L is a variable which is sensitive

to correlations, a reminder of the atomic physics

Crystal fields quench L, interactions enhance it,

T2g levels carry moment, eg levels do not any redistribution of these no matter how small will affect L.

Both J and U matter !


RUTGERS

Magnetic anisotropy of Fe and Ni LDA+ U


RUTGERS

Surprise correct Ni Fermi Surface!


RUTGERS

Conclusion

The character of the localization delocalization in simple( Hubbard) models within DMFT is now fully understood, nice qualitative insights.

This has lead to extensions to more realistic models, and a beginning of a first principles approach interpolating between atoms and band, encouraging results for simple elements


RUTGERS

1

10

1( ) ( )

( )n nn k nk

G i ii t i

w ww m w

-

-é ùê ú= +Sê ú- + - Sê úë ûå

DMFT Review: A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth and M. Rozenberg Rev. Mod. Phys. 68,13 (1996)]

†

0 0 0

[ ] ( )[ ( , ')] ( ')o o o oS Go c Go c n nb b b

s st t t t ¯= +òò ò

† †

, ,

( )( )ij ij i j j i i ii j i

t c c c c U n n

0

†( )( ) ( ) ( )L n o n o n S GG i c i c iw w w=- á ñ

10 ( ) ( )n n nG i i iw w m w- = + - D

0

1 † 10 0 ( )( )[ ] ( ) [ ( ) ( ) ]n n n n S Gi G G i c i c ia bw w w w- -S = + á ñ

Weiss field


RUTGERS

Outlook

Systematic improvements, short range correlations.

Take a cluster of sites, include the effect of the rest in a G0 (renormalization of the quadratic part of the effective action). What to take for G0:

DCA (M. Jarrell et.al) , CDMFT ( Savrasov Palsson and GK )

include the effects of the electrons to renormalize the quartic part of the action (spin spin , charge charge correlations) E. DMFT (Kajueter and GK, Si et.al)


RUTGERS

Outlook

Extensions of DMFT implemented on model systems, carry over to more realistic framework. Better determination of Tcs…………

First principles approach: determination of the Hubbard parameters, and the double counting corrections long range coulomb interactions E-DMFT

Improvement in the treatement of multiplet effects in the impurity solvers, phonon entropies, ………


RUTGERS

Ni moment


RUTGERS

Fe moment


RUTGERS

Magnetic anisotropy vs U , J=.95 Ni

1 3


RUTGERS

Magnetic anisotropy Fe J=.8

Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University

Documents

Transcript of Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University