G4-Annex2 Updated Workbook

7/31/2019 G4-Annex2 Updated Workbook

1/44

Project Workbook

Table of Contents

1 Title Page with Reviewers' Comments

Tab Name: G4 Title Page

2 Project Partners and Contact Information

Tab Name: G4 Contacts

3 Outcomes Logic Model

Tab Name: G4 OLM

For more information, visit:

4 Outcome Target Indicators PlanTab Name: G4 OTIP


5 Milestone Plan

Tab Name: G4 Milestone Plan


The milestone plan focuses on the end-dates by which your activities need to be completed and outputs need to

be delivered. It contains the project start and end date, and other important milestones. Progress reporting is

directly made on the original milestones as defined in the milestone plan.

This file contains spreadsheets of information submitted to the CPWF by the project team, and spreadsheets that we

have developed to aid our review process. Please change the 'PNX' to identify your project, e.g. Ganges Project 3 would

be G3

This page contains main project information and the contracting and inception reviewers' comments.

Please list all your project participants with their contact details. This information will be fed into the CPWFcontact database. Please ensure that you inform the CPWF about any changes in your team.

The OLM is a table that describes the project's theory of change (ToC), or how the project is expected to work. It

is a description of the projects activities, outputs, outcomes and impact and their inter-relationships. Each line

describes an Outcome Pathway, with a short narrative description. The last row in the model is a narrative

description of how the project predicts that the outcomes it achieves are likely to reinforce each other and

eventually contribute to longer-term impact.

CPWF M&E Guide- Outcome Indicators Plan

CPWF M&E Guide- OLMs

The Outcome Target Indicators Plan (OTIP) contains specific description(s), for each Outcome Pathway (from

OLM), of who/ how many exactly the project expects to change (Practice and/or KAS) and by how much, by the

end of the Project. Indicators and tools to measure them are included for each outcome target.

CPWF M&E Guide- Milestone Plan

CPWF Project Workbook Table of Contents Page 1 of 44
https://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/indicator-and-milestone-planhttps://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/outcome-pathways-and-outcome-logic-modelhttps://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/indicator-and-milestone-planhttps://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/indicator-and-milestone-planhttps://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/outcome-pathways-and-outcome-logic-modelhttps://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/indicator-and-milestone-plan


2/44

6 Gantt Chart

Tab Name: G4 Gantt Chart


7 Schedule of Reports and Payments = filled by CPWF Finance Officer for contracting

Tab Name: G4 $ Schedule

8 Budget Summary

Tab Name: G4 $ Summary

9 Budget Comments

Tab Name: G4 $ Comments

10 Staff Time Allocation and Breakdown of Personnel Costs

Tab Name: G4 $ Time Allocation

11 Indicative Breakdown of Budget by Outputs

Tab Name: G4 $ By Outputs

12 Indicative Breakdown of Budget by Institution

Tab Name: G4 $ By Institution

This table shows the distribution of budget by output then by institution. The overhead costs are not included in

the distribution.

This table shows a summary of the budget allocated to the project partner institutions (left part). The right part

of the table could be of support to work out each project partners budget share by line item.

This spreadsheet shows the breakdown of the project budget per line item and per year.

The comments worksheet is where budget explanations and details are explained.

In this worksheet the project team compositon is listed with their names, institution, expertise and contribution

to the project (e.g., Output 1, Communication, Policy, etc.), the number of days per year, and the daily rate per

staff.

The Gantt Chart focuses on the activities to be carried out to complete the project. This chart contains the

project schedule, work breakdown structure, i.e. activities with their milestones as the terminal elements, their

start and finish dates, responsible project team member and their affiliations.

CPWF M&E Guide- Gantt Chart

This spreadsheet will be filled out by CPWF finance officer for contracting according to the budget details the

project has submitted. It shows the schedule of budget release, which depends on the satisfactory submission

and approval of the required progress reports.

CPWF Project Workbook Table of Contents Page 2 of 44
https://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/gantt-charthttps://sites.google.com/a/cpwf.info/m-e-guide/gantt-chart


3/44

Title Page with Reviewers' Comments

Project Leader

Project Number

Project Short Title

Reporting Period

Starting Date

Completion Date

Review Questions (RQ) Reviewer Remarks on status (inlcude

date)

Changes required to proceed

to contracting

Response from the Project

Leader (include date)

Status of changes required

after resubmission [to be

filled in by the reviewers]

P

ro

RQ1: Are documents in order,

provide information required,

and is there consistency

between them?

Cells highlighted in yellow must be

dealt with for contracting

Documents according to Standard

Clauses and Procedures 3.02 and

3.03 (see list below)

Cells highlighted in orange must be

dealt with by time of inception

re ort

Revised proposal First submission 2011.02.28Revised proposal 2011.04.12

Revised as per reviewers'suggestions2011.04.12

Contact sheet First submission 2011.02.28

Updated CVs 2011.04.12

Revised (an economist and a

sociologist has been added to

the IWM team) 2011.04.12

Gantt chart First submission 2011.02.28

Revised workbook 2011.04.12

Revised by adding schedules

for field visits, interaction

meetings and stakeholder

training/workshops for better

communication strategy

2011.04.12

Milestone plan First submission 2011.02.28Revised workbook 2011.04.12

Revised by adding field tourreports and meeting minutes

2011.04.13 The dates/

deadlines for field tours and

meeting minutes have been

added 2011.05.15

please add the dates/deadlines for field tours and

meeting minutes

KM PointPerson

Zahirul Haque Khan

Assessment of the impact of anticipated external drivers of change on water resources of the coastal zone

G4

April 30, 2011

April 30, 2014

PWF Project Workbook Title Page with Reviewers' Comments


4/44


date)


to contracting



Status of changes required

after resubmission [to be

filled in by the reviewers]

OLM First submission 2011.02.28


Revised by changing actors

(farmers and fishermen inside

polders have been added and

development partners have

been ommitted); and making

the outcomes more specific.

2011.04.12

OTIP First submission 2011.02.28


Revised 2011.04.12

Budget First submission 2011.02.28


Revised to a total of $825,000

(IWM Personnel remuneration

cost has been reduced by 23%)

2011.04.12

Plan for baselining of outcometargets

To be provided at inception report.

Signed MOUs corresponding to

milestone plan

To be provided at inception report.

Third party intellectual audit To be provided at inception report.

CPWF Project Workbook Title Page with Reviewers' Comments


5/44


date)


to contracting



Status of chan

after resubmi

filled in by the

RQ2: Have there been changesin budget share going to

partners, and if so, are they

consistent with the changes in

responsibilities?

ProgramManager

Budget share haline with the de

ie the % split is t

everyone has be

accordingly.

RQ3: Does the budget appear

consistent with the promised

outputs?

Program

Manager

Yes

RQ4: Looking at the people

responsible for producing the

outputs, do these teams

contain people with the

requisite skill and is team size

appropriate?

MT Point

Person

RQ5: Is there a clear

assignment of responsibility

for producing outputs and

milestones to both individuals

and organizations?

MT Point

Person

RQ6: Have reviewers'

comments been addressed?

MT Point

Person

See points below. Status

provided by Research Director.

Raise the priority to be given to sceanrio

analysis on socio-economic drivers, and

make sure that the team skills are suchthat these drivers can be propoerly

modeled.

This concern has

Improve cohesiveness with the rest of the

BDC. Clarify who and how consideration

of the policy arena and input into the

policy decision making processes will take

place other than through useful

references to links with G3. Greater

linkages requried with G5 and

reconginition of key role and

dependencies.

This concern shou

way of contractin

addressed by the

report.

Develop a communicatinons strategy

involving decision makers from the

outset, ideally linked with the G5

communications strategy;

This concern shou

way of contractin

addressed by the

report.



6/44


date)


to contracting



The proposal as currently designed

appears to be around achieveable outputs

wwhile identified outcomes reamin very

board and unsupported. This needs to be

addressed prior to contracting, trhough

greater specificity in the project outcome

logic model, and improved at the time of

the Inception Report.

Explore links with Topic Working Groups,

specially Resilience, but also Global

Drivers. This includes the potential to

bring in Resilience exptertise that is

currently lacking in the team.

Revise project to provide a more detailed

literature review (including achievements

from IGB Phase 1) to identify knowledge

gaps and build the projects upon these

gaps.

Ensure that sufficient checks are

incorporated to ensure WEAP model

simulations are realistic and possible.

Adjust budget lines in accordance with

reactions to reviewer comments (noting

the desirabaility of the partnerships vs

the small number of days/large team

situation across IWM personnel). Is 6k for

software rental appropriate?

Participation in Reflection workshops is

too low (10k a year). and IFWF should be

15k a year.

Software purchased but pay

developers a rental fee of appro

6k. Budget for IFWF increased t

15k a year. Budget for Reflectio

5k a year which is reasonable si

most team members are from

Bangladesh.

Project budget cannot exceed $825k

which is the amount specified in the

orgininal invitation to submit an EOI.

Adjusted (see above)



7/44


date)


to contracting



Status of ch

after resub

filled in by t

Checked by

as MT lead

From Standard Clauses and Procedures

3.02 The documents required for contract signature are:

Revised project proposal that has addressed reviewers comments in particular negotiation points and incorporates changes

from workshops and other consultation processes.

Revised budget reflecting changes in project proposal

Gantt Chart

Milestone plan developed for at least the first year of operations

Draft Outcome Logic Model

Any other documentation agreed to between the Project Leader and the CPWF

3.03 The following documents are to be provided in electronic form to CPWF Basin Leader with the Inception Report:

Outcome Logic Model agreed with partners

Milestone plan developed for the duration of the project

Outcome target indicators plan

Plan for base lining of outcome targets

Signed MOUs corresponding to milestone plan

Third Party Intellectual Asset Audit

Any other documentation agreed to between the Project Leader and the CPWF.



8/44

Project Partners and Contact Details

Please remember to provide a CV for each person listed below as Annex B to your proposal. Indicate in particular who has responsibility for communications, M&E, knowledge sharing a

Given Name Family Name Institution Role in the project Professional

discipline

Email Alternate Email Work Phone Mobile

Zahirul Haque Khan IWM Project Leader Water and

Environmental

Management

[email protected] +88-02-8827902,

+88-02-8822105-

6,+88-02-8824590-

1, Ext:161

+88-01

Abu Saleh Khan IWM Principal

Investigator (Nat'l)

Water Resource

Management


+88-02-8822105-6,+88-02-8824590-

1, Ext:118

+88-01

A. H. M. Kausher IWM Principal


Water Resource

Management


+88-02-8822105-

6,+88-02-8824590-

1, Ext:161

+88-01

Manjur Murshed

Zahid

Ahmed IWM Principal


Coastal Hydrology

nd Hydraulics


+88-02-8822105-

6,+88-02-8824590-

1, Ext:154

+88-01

Rubayat Alam IWM Principal


Costal Morphology [email protected] +88-02-8827902,

+88-02-8822105-6,+88-02-8824590-

1, Ext:121

+88-01

Md. Mobassarul Hasan IWM Principal


Coastal Hydrology

nd Hydraulics


+88-02-8822105-

6,+88-02-8824590-

1, Ext:133

+88-01
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]


9/44


disci line


Shume Akhter IWM Principal


Hydrology and

Water Management


+88-02-8822105-

6,+88-02-8824590-

1, Ext:159

+88-01

Farhana Akhter Kamal IWM Principal


Hydrology and

Water Management


+88-02-8822105-

6,+88-02-8824590-

1, Ext:159

+88-01

Mahendra Chandra Dey IWM Principal


Economics [email protected] +88-02-8827902,

+88-02-8822105-

6,+88-02-8824590-

1, Ext:160

Mustafa Kamal Hassan IWM Consultant (Socio-

economic)

Socio-economics

Bharat R. Sharma IWMI Principal

Investigator (Int'l)

Soil Physics-Water

Management

[email protected] +91-11-

25840811/12

Luna Bharati IWMI Principal


Water Resources [email protected] +94-11-2787404
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]


10/44


disci line


Yann Chemin IWMI Principal


Technical Sciences in

remote sensing/GIS

applications

yann.chemin@gmail

.com

Upali Amarasinghe IWMI Principal


Statistics and

modeling

Vladimir Smakhtin IWMI Principal


M. Shah Alam Khan IWFM-BUET Principal


Civil and

Environmental

Engineering

msalamkhan@iwfm.

buet.ac.bd

+88 02 966 5601,

966 5650 to 80, Ext.

7442, 7506

A.K.M. Saiful Islam IWFM-BUET Principal


Water Resource

Engineering

akmsaifulislam@iwf

m.buet.ac.bd

+88-01

Mohammad Asad Hussain IWFM-BUET Principal


Civil and

Environmental

Engineering

[email protected]

c.bd

+88 02 966 5601,

966 5650 to 80, Ext.

7952, 7650
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]


11/44


disci line


Md Mahfuzur Rahman BWDB Principal


Hydraulic

Engineering

mmahfuz82@yahoo

.com

+88-01

Sarafat Hossain Khan BWDB Principal


Water Resources

Planning

sarafat.khan@gmail.

com

+88-01

Saleh Ahmed BWDB Principal


Hydrology
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]


12/44

Responsible for

Guide and supervise the activities of all professionals, ensure the

quality of research activities and outputs, responsile for identification

of external drivers and devising potential scenarios, involve the

caibration and validation of different models and simulation of

scenarios, responsible for establishing linkage with other projects

and partners, report writing, responsible for personal & project

discussion and interaction meetings, dessimination of research

results

Quality control, supervise the praparatio of GIS maps on inundation

depth, salinity zoning map and storm surge risk map, contributingthe praparion of bi-annual reports, quality control of outputs

Review of literature, collection of field infromation, assessment of

impact of drainage congestion, salinity intrusion in bseline condition,

maintaining liason with local stakeholders, BWDB, LGED and WMA

Review of available literature on cyclone induced storm surge risk,

assessment of baseline condition on storm surge inundation,

assessment of impacts of climate change on storm surge risk,

reporting and documentation

Carrying out sediment modellig, assessment of sedimentation rate in

the peripherial rivers of the selected polders in baseline conditionand for external drivers

Carrying out drainage modelling, calibration and validation of the

model, Preparation of drainage and flood depth map


13/44

Responsible for

Carrying out water flow and saliinity modelling, calibration and

validation of the model, Preparation of salinity zoning map

Water flow, salinity, drainage modelling for baseline condition and

external drivers

Identify of socio-economic drivers and their effects

Identify of socio-economic drivers and their effects

Guide and supervise the assessment of cross-boundary flow, impact

of land use on water resources, review of model results and reports

Identification of external drivers, development of scenarios base on

external drivers, collection of data and contribution in reports for the

Indian part of the Ganges basin, effect of cross-boundary flow,

assessment of effect of glacier melt and precipitation on cross-

boundary flow due to climate change, assessment of the effect of

land-use change on water resources interaction with G2 and G3 for

planning of cropping system and water governance, contribution to

prepare bi-annual and final reports on research findings


14/44

Responsible for

Model development calibration and validation using SWAT and

WEAP, simulation of baseline conditions and climate change

scenarios to assess cross-boundary flow, effects of land-use and

climate change

Literature review on external drivers, climate change and water

management, supervise the climate change modelling using RCM,

contributing in selecting external drivers, Review of drainage, salinity,

sediment and storm surge modelling results, documentation

Selection of RCMs, selection and simulation of climate change

scenarios, calibration and validation of RCMs, assessment of climate

change projections using RCMs for 2020, 2030, 2050, documentation

Literature review selection of climate change scenario, contribution

in climate change, water flow, storm-surge and sediment modelling


15/44

Responsible for

Identification of external drivers, collection of field data and

information from BWDB offices, review of results on water flow,

drainage congestion, salinity intrusion and storm-surge inundation,

networkin with BWDB, LGED and MoWR










16/44

Outcomes Logic Model

roject Name

ate

Actor(s) Desired change in actor(s)practice

Required change in actor KASfor change to happen

Project strategies andprototypes for bringing about

changes

Project outputs

Hint: How will your project contribute

to make these changes happen?

What areyour ideason how to

help people change?

Here, it may help to think what

other projects have done before

that has NOT worked well- what

will your project do that is

different? Better? Strategies can

be the way (for example, co-

develop instead of impose) you do

things. Strategies are also thetiming, methods, partnerships,

language, etc. you choose to use


April 12, 2011

Start with this question:if this

project is successful, WHOwill

change? What groups of people

or organizations will be

affected?Be realistic,

andprioritizethe most 'affected'.

Then, try to be as specific about

the actor groups as possible- in

some actor groups as possible- in

some cases you have the names

or exact location of the actor(s)-

use them here.

A change inpractice or behavioris

a change in the way people (in

this case, the 'actors' in the 1st

column)DOthings. So here, try to

use action words- such as 'use',

'coordinate', 'plant', 'participate

in', 'integrate', 'implement', etc.

To be able to 'use' something,

people usually need to first know/

understand it, and its advantages,

and/ or have developed the

skillsto use it, or at least

tobelieve or trustthe benefits of

using it. Look at your practice

change, and make explicit 2-4 KAS

changes that are key to having

the actor groups change their

practice.

These come straight out of your

road map/ research questions

and/ or your contracted

deliverables. Which is (are) your

project's main output (s) related

to this 'line of change?

PWF Project Workbook Outcomes Logic Model


17/44

oject Name

ate

Actor(s) Desired change in actor(s)

practice

Required change in actor KAS

for change to happen

Project strategies and

prototypes for bringing about

changes

Project outputs Risks and A


April 12, 2011

utcome

athway 1

Researchers of G1, G2, G3 and

other projects

- Use of data and information

for Improvement in resource

profiling, crop planning and

water governance

- Development of new

database on water resources

K: Understanding of the key

external drivers of change

A : motivation to use new

knowledge and informationin

their research S: Improving

skill in interpreting maps,

charts, data in crop planning

and water resources

management

Engagement of BDC partners

Fitting out the information in

timely manner

1. List of key external drivers

2. Inundation Depth-Duration

Map for previous, current and

future condition in specific

polders

3. Isohaline and salinity zoning

map for existing and future

conditions

4. Flow availability, weekly and

seasonal (3monthly)

5. water storage volume inside

the polder

6. Present and future

Sedimentation

7. Storm surge risk zoning

Timely and

participatio

groups for

external dr

Availability

time

Proper and

the partne

arrative 1 Various external drivers will cause changes on water resources and may have significant effects on flooding, submergence (drainage congestion), salinity intrusion and wate

different polders of the coastal zone of the Ganges basin. The list of the drivers will help the researchers to identify the major external drivers that will have significant impac

resources. The present and changed inundation depth-duration maps, salinity zoning maps and timeseries, flow availability, water storage volume inside the polders and sed

the peripherial rivers will motivate them to incorporate the new knowledge into their research. They may use these data and information in resource profiling, crop planning

governance. It will also help G1 to develop their database.

WF Project Workbook Outcomes Logic Model


18/44

oject Name

ate


practice





changes



April 12, 2011

utcome

athway 2

WMOs, BWDB, LGED, DAE,

DMB, DOE and NGOs

Change in planning and design

of water, agriculture and

disaster management projects;

water managers of BWDB &

LGED will change their present

practice of operation of large

regulators for not only flood

control but also water uses in

agricultural production inside

the polders;

K: Acquiring new knowledge

and benefits

A : Encouraged to adopt

Development of operation

rule/guidelines for the sluices

Frequent interactions with the

organizations on research

activities and outputs

Plan for improvement of

drainage channels, sluices and

embankments

water availability

Isohaline map

Storm surge risk map

Proper and

and downs

Availability

in time

Availability

implement

arrative 2

utcome

athway 3

MoWR, MoEF, C.C. Cell Will change their views in

approving their projects in

water management

K: Understanding of effects of

external drivers on water

resources

A : Motivated and encouraged

Workshops, seminars and

interaction meetings with the

policymakers and beneficiaries

to disseminate the impacts of

the external drivers and the

benefits of the adaptation

measures and policy changes;

the upscaling will be facilitated

by G5

Effects of external drivers on

water resources

Benefits of adaptation

measures

Proper ups

arrative 3

mpact Narrative

The research outcomes will help these institutions to plan their future srategies to cope with the anticipated changes. They will be encouraged to adopt new water & enviro

management plan and improved operation & maintainance of water structures. As a result, the agricultural production will be enhance and food security will be ensured.

Understanding of the effects of external drivers & anticipated change of water resources and the benefits of adaptation measures will encourage these policymakers to be m

formulate new policies. It will also enable them for advocacy to the development partners and planning commission of Bangladesh.



19/44

oject Name

ate


practice





changes



April 12, 2011

oastal polders of Bangladesh had been built in early 60s and 70s to enhance agricultural production and ensure food and livelihood security of local communities. In the recent years coas

een facing multiple problems and challenges such as drainage congestions, shortage of irrigation water , deterioration of infrastructure, salinity intrusion, sedimentation of rivers, and cli

hallenges. The agricultural production as well as the local community will be affected considerably by external drivers. The present research will assess the present condition and implica

xternal drivers on water resources. G4 will interact directly with G1, G2, G3 and G5 to provide the outputs of this research for their research activities, especially crop planning system, da

evelopment . Workshops, seminars and interaction meetings will be conducted to desseminate research outputs to implementing agencies, andpolicymakers for improvement of presen

an and adaptation measures. This research project will provide plan for improvement of khal systems, sluices and embankments; and implementation of this plan will lead to social, econ

nvironmental improvements.



20/44

Outcome Targets Indicator Plan

Project Name

Date

No. ACTOR and how they will CHANGE Outcome target(s) Indicator(s) of progress towards

Outcome Target(s)

Tools to measure progress towards

Outcome Target(s)

Taken from the OLM: Actor group and

the practice, knowledge, attitude or skills

change

Specific description(s) of who/ how many

exactly the project expects to change

(Practice and/or KAS) and by how much,

by the end of the Project. There can be

more than one Outcome Target per each

Outcome line (first column- actor +

expected final change)

What you will observe and measure to

know you are moving towards the

Outcome Target (other than

milestones)?

What will be your instruments to observe

and measure your progress towards the

Outcome Target ?

1 Researchers of G1, G2, G3 and other

institutions:

They will be encouraged to use the

data and information in their studies.They will also formulate new resource

profiling, crop planning and water

governance for the changed condition

due to various external drivers

Data and information are used in

their research

New database is developed

Researchers are motivated andencouraged to use new data,

information and knowledge

Reflection of using new data and

information in the outputs of the

researchers

Persuasion for technical sheets,timeseriese data and maps

Monitoring, evaluation, personal &

project discussion and interaction

The Outcome Target Indicators Plan (OTIP) contains specific description(s), for each Outcome Pathway (from OLM), of who/ how many exactly the project expects to change

(Practice and/or KAS) and by how much, by the end of the Project, project is committing to measure. THe expected output in this OTIP is a list of indicators ONLY for the

Outcome Targets that the Indicators and tools to measure them are included for each outcome target.


April 12, 2011

WF Project Workbook Outcome Targets Indicator Plan Page 20 of 44


21/44

Project Name

Date

No. ACTOR and how they will CHANGE Outcome target(s) Indicator(s) of progress towards

Outcome Target(s)

Tools to measure progress towards

Outcome Target(s)


April 12, 2011

2 BWDB, LGED, DAE, DMB, DOE:

They will use improved water and

environmental management; they

will improve the operation and

maintainance of water management

infrastructure for enhanced

agricultural production

Improvement of drainage channels,

sluices and embankments

Revised and improved

implementation plan

changed project documents

Monitoring, evaluation, personal &

project discussion and interaction

3 MoWR, MoEF, C.C. Cell:

Understanding of effects of external

drivers on water resources will enable

them to change the national water

policy, national water management

plan, Bangladesh Climate Change

Srategy and Action Plan, Disaster

Management Policy. The research

documents will help them to

advocate the development parners

for considering the changed

conditions in their future projects.

Data and information are used in

changing policies

Revised and changed policies,

national water and crop management

plan and BCCSAP

personal & project discussion and

interaction

WF Project Workbook Outcome Targets Indicator Plan Page 21 of 44


22/44

Milestone Plan

roject Name

ate

o. Milestones = your progress markers Deadline Responsible

Partner Institution

Responsible Staff

Project Member

Outputs required

by other projects

Means of verification

Description of deliverable required to achieve change, from Gantt For delivery of

Milestone, format:

yy-mm-dd

For delivery of

Milestone, can only

be one

For delivery of

Milestone, can only

be one

Yes or no? If yes,

please specify

What the project will deliver to the C

as evidence of completion of the

Milestone

0.a Sites selected and partners for research and planning

engagment identified and engaged

2011/06/30 IWM ZHK G1, G2, G3, G5:

Study location

map

Map of selected sites

MoU with partners

0.b Project progress reports 2011-09-30

2012-03-31

2012-09-30

2013-03-31

2013-09-302014-03-30

IWM ZHK Workplan, data &

information

needed by G1, G2,

G3, G5

Six-monthly reports

1.a Literature Review and synthesis report 2011/09/30 IWM ZHK Literature Review and synthesis

report

1.b Identified external drivers 2011/12/31 IWM ZHK G1, G2, G3, G5:

Review and

priority ranking

List of selected external drivers &

report

1.c Processed field data 2012/05/30 IWM ZHK Data series

1.d Tour reports 2011-06-15

2011-12-22

2012-03-29

2012-06-21

2012-12-31

2013-03-28 2013-

06-272013-12-31 2014-

03-28

IWM ZHK


February 28, 2011

o be filled by PLs and Project Teams

WF Project Workbook Milestone Plan


23/44

roject Name

ate


Partner Institution

Responsible Staff

Project Member

Outputs required

by other projects



February 28, 2011


1.e Meeting minutes 2011-09-30

2012-03-31

2012-09-30

2013-03-31

2013-09-30

2014-03-30

2.a Selected climate change models 2011/06/30 IWFM-BUET AKMSI List of selected climate change

models

2.b Developed calibrated and validated RCMs 2011/12/31 IWFM-BUET AKMSI Report on model development,

calibration and validation

2.c Baseline condition established 2011/12/31 IWFM-BUET AKMSI Baseline data (generated by model)

2.d Establishment of climate change projections: temperature,

precipitation, sea level rise

2012/03/31 IWFM-BUET AKMSI Temperature, precipitation, sea leve

rise data (generated by model) forclimate change scenario in 2020,

2030 & 2050

3.a Calibrated and validated SWAT and WEAP models for Ganges

basin covering India and Bangladesh

2012/09/30 IWMI BRS Report on model development,


3.b Estimate the effects of landuse change and population growth 2013/03/31 IWMI BRS Report on estimation of the effects

landuse change and population

growth

3.c Assessed cross-boundary flow in baseline condition 2012/12/31 IWMI BRS Report on assessment of cross-

boundary flow in baseline condition

3.d Assessed cross-boundary flow in the Ganges for external

drivers

2013/03/31 IWMI BRS Report on assessment of cross-

boundary flow for external drivers

4.a Selected model for flooding, drainage congestion, water flow,salinity and storm surge

2011/12/31 IWM ZHK Report on selected models



24/44

roject Name

ate


Partner Institution

Responsible Staff

Project Member

Outputs required

by other projects



February 28, 2011


4.b Final selection of climate and cross-boundary flow data for

generating boundary for flow and salinity models

2012/03/31 IWM ZHK Data analysis report

4.c Developed calibrated and validated GBM basin model, SWRM

and BoB model

2012/02/29 IWM ZHK Report on model development,


4.d Assessed baseline water flow in coastal region of the Ganges

river (southwest region of Bangladesh)

2012/06/30 IWM ZHK G1, G2, G3:

Required format

and data period

Water flow time-series and statistic

analysis at various locations of the

region

4.e Assessed water flow in coastal region of the Ganges river for

external drivers

2012/12/31 IWM ZHK G1, G2, G3:

Required format

and data period

Water flow time-series and statistic

analysis at various locations of the

region

4.f Generated salinity zoning map in coastal region of the Ganges

river for baseline condition (southwest region of Bangladesh)

2012/07/30 IWM ZHK G1, G2, G3:

Required format

and data period

Baseline salinity zoning map

4.g Generated salinity zoning map in coastal region of the Ganges

river for changed external drivers

2013/03/31 IWM ZHK G1, G2, G3:

Required format

and data period

Salinity zoning map for external

drivers

4.h Generated srorm surge risk map in coastal region of the

Ganges river for baseline condition

2013/09/30 IWM ZHK G1, G2, G3:

Required format

and data period

Baseline srorm surge risk zoning ma

4.i Generated srorm surge risk map in coastal region of the

Ganges river for changed external drivers

2013/12/31 IWM ZHK G1, G2, G3:

Required format

and data period

Srorm surge risk zoning map for

changed external drivers



25/44

roject Name

ate


Partner Institution

Responsible Staff

Project Member

Outputs required

by other projects



February 28, 2011


5.a Developed calibrated and validated dedicated drainage and

morphological model for polders 3,31, and 43/2F

2012/06/30 IWM ZHK G1, G2, G3:

Required format

and data period

Report on model development,

calibration and validation for the

three dedicated models

5.b Generated inundation depth-duration map for the selected

polders in baseline condition

2012/11/30 IWM ZHK G1, G2, G3:

Required format

and data period

Inundation depth-duration map for

the selected polders in baseline

condition

5.c Generated inundation depth-duration map for the selected

polders for external drivers

2013/03/31 IWM ZHK G1, G2, G3:

Required format

and data period

Inundation depth-duration map for

the selected polders for changed

external drivers

5.d Assessed sedimentation pattern in the peripherial rivers andkhals for selected polders in baseline condition

2013/09/30 IWM ZHK G2: location andtime

Bathymetry maps in the peripherialrivers and khals for selected polders

in baseline condition

5.e Assessed sedimentation pattern in the peripherial rivers and

khals for selected polders for external drivers

2013/12/31 IWM ZHK G2: location and

time

Bed level change maps in the

peripherial rivers and khals for

selected polders in baseline conditio

for external drivers



26/44

or Reporting

o be reported by PLs and Project

eam

For review by BL For review by CPWF

tatus report on delivery of

milestones

Review of evidence of delivery of

milestone and of research quality

and relevance


milestone and quality check of BLs

review

eport on delivery of milestones or

hanges to plan. Changes to Milestone

an must be justified.

To be assessed by Basin Leader To be assessed by CPWF



27/44


eam


atus report on delivery of

ilestones



and relevance



review



28/44


eam



ilestones



and relevance



review



29/44


eam



ilestones



and relevance



review



30/44

antt Chart

oject Name

ate

No. Activity/ Milestone

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2

0 Project Implementation

ctivities 0.1 Sites selected, partners engaged

0.2 Project progress reports

ilestones 0.a Sites selected and partners for research and planning

engagment identified and engaged

0.a

0.b Project progress reports 0.b 0.b 0.b 0.b 0.b 0.b

1 Field visits, interaction meetings, data collection, literature review, driver identification, workshops and trainings

ctivities 1.1 Review of the existing model studies, literature, available data

1.2 Identification of external drivers and their ranking

1.3 Workshop for finalizing the external drivers

1.4 Training/workshop to disseminate the research results

1.5 Field visits

1.6 Interaction meetings

1.4 Collection and analysis of hydrological and morphologic data

ilestones 1.a Literature Review and synthesis report 1.a

1.b Identified external drivers 1.b

1.c Processed field data 1.c

1.d Tour reports 1.d 1.d 1.d 1.d 1.d 1.d 1.d 1.d 1.d

1.e Meeting minutes 1.e 1.e 1.e 1.e 1.e 1.e

2 Assessment of climate scenarios and projections

ctivities 2.1 Selection of suitable climate change models

2.2 Development, calibration and validation of RCMs for baseline

condition

2.3 Simulating climate change scenarios


April 12, 2011

2011 2012 2013 201

WF Project Workbook Gantt Chart


31/44

oject Name

ate


Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2


April 12, 2011

2011 2012 2013 201

ilestones 2.a Selectied climate change models 2.a

2.b Developed calibrated and validated RCMs 2.b

2.c Baseline condition established 2.c

2.d Establishment of climate change projections: temperature,

precipitation, sea level rise

2.d

3 Assessment of cross-boundary flow, effect of landuse change and population growth

ctivities 3.1 Development, calibration and validation of SWAT model for

assessing baseline condition

3.2 Projection of climate change condition using SWAT model

3.2 Development, calibration and validation of WEAP model for

assessing baseline condition

3.3 Projection of population growth and landuse for future

condition using WEAP model

3.4 Computation of cross-boundary flowilestones 3.a Calibrated and validated SWAT and WEAP models for Ganges

basin covering India and Bangladesh

3.a

3.b Estimate the effects of land-use change and population growth 3.b

3.c Assessed cross-boundary flow in baseline condition 3.c

3.d Assessed cross-boundary flow in the Ganges for external

drivers

3.d

4 Simulation of scenarios and assessment of anticipated changes on water resources

ctivities 4.1 Selection of suitable models for assessment of flooding,

drainage congestion, water availability, salinity and storm

surge

4.2 Analysis of climate and cross-boundary flow data for model

setup (present and future condition)



32/44

oject Name

ate


Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2


April 12, 2011

2011 2012 2013 201

4.3 Development, calibration and validation of GBM basin model,

SWRM and BoB model

4.4 Assessment of baseline water flow in coastal region of the

Ganges river

4.5 Assessment of water flow in coastal region of the Ganges river

for external drivers (scenarios)

4.6 Assessment of baseline salinity in coastal region of the Ganges

river and selected polders

4.7 Assessment of salinity in coastal region of the Ganges river

and selected polders for external drivers (scenarios)

4.8 Assessment of baseline storm surge risk in coastal region of

the Ganges river and selected polders

4.9 Assessment of storm surge risk in coastal region of the Ganges

river and selected polders for external drivers (scenarios)

ilestones 4.a Selected model for flooding, drainage congestion, water flow,

salinity and storm surge

4.a

4.b Final selection of climate and cross-boundary flow data for

generating boundary for flow and salinity models

4.b

4.c Developed calibrated and validated GBM basin model, SWRM

and BoB model

4.c

4.d Assessed baseline water flow in coastal region of the Ganges

river (southwest region of Bangladesh)

4.d

4.e Assessed water flow in coastal region of the Ganges river for

external drivers

4.e

4.f Generated salinity zoning map in coastal region of the Ganges

river for baseline condition (southwest region of Bangladesh)

4.f



33/44

oject Name

ate


Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2


April 12, 2011

2011 2012 2013 20

4.g Generated salinity zoning map in coastal region of the Ganges

river for changed external drivers

4.g

4.h Generated srorm surge risk map in coastal region of the

Ganges river for baseline condition

4.h

4.i Generated srorm surge risk map in coastal region of the

Ganges river for changed external drivers

4.i



34/44

oject Name

ate


Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2


April 12, 2011

2011 2012 2013 20

5 Simulation of scenarios and assessment of anticipated changes for the selected polders (3, 31 & 43/2F)

ctivities 5.1 Development, calibration and validation of dedicated drainage

and morphological model for polders 3,31, and 43/2F

5.2 Assessment of flooding and drainage congestion inside the

selected polders for baseline condition

5.3 Assessment of flooding and drainage congestion inside the

selected polders for changed condition

5.4 Assessment of sedimentation pattern in the peripherial rivers

and khals for selected polders in baseline condition

5.5 Assessment of sedimentation pattern in the peripherial rivers

and khals for selected polders in changed condition

ilestones 5.a Developed calibrated and validated dedicated drainage and

morphological model for polders 3,31, and 43/2F

5.a

5.b Generated inundation depth-duration map for the selected

polders in baseline condition

5.b

5.c Generated inundation depth-duration map for the selected

polders in changed condition

5.c

5.d Assessed sedimentation pattern in the peripherial rivers and

khals for selected polders in baseline condition

5.d

5.e Assessed sedimentation pattern in the peripheral rivers and

khals for selected polders in changed condition

5.e



35/44

Schedule of Reports and Payments

Project Name

Date

No. Amount (US$) Comment Due Date

1 138,511Paid on return of the signed Award Letter. These funds are to

cover the first six months activities of the Project (50% of first

2 138,511

Paid following satisfactory assessment of progress of the first 6

months of project implementation. (50% of first year budget)

3 137,557

Paid following satisfactory assessment of progress of the first

12 months of project implementation. (50% of second year

budget)

4 137,557

Paid following satisfactory assessment of progress of the 18

months of project implementation. (50% of second year

budget)

5 122,789

Paid following satisfactory assessment of progress of the 24

months of project implementation. The milestone plan for the

following two years of project activities must also be approved.

(50% of final year budget less 10%)

6 122,789

Paid following satisfactory assessment of progress of 30

months of project implementation. (50% of final year budget

less 10%)

7 27,286Paid on acceptance of the Project Completion Report and an

external audit report (10% of final year budget)

Assessment of the impact of anticipated external drivers of change on water

resources of the coastal zone

This worksheet will be filled by CPWF Finance Officer for contracting

CPWF Project Workbook Schedule of Reports and Payments Page 35 of 44


36/44

Budget Summary(Before working on the Personnel budget cells, complete the other spreadsheet named PNXX $ Time Allocation)

Project Name

Date

2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL

1 PERSONNEL REMUNERATION, TRAVEL AND ACCOMMODATION

1.1 PERSONNEL

1.1.1 Project Leader 25,850 41,360 41,360 20,680 129,250

1.1.2 Principal Investigators (Int'L & Reg'l) 22,250 47,000 25,500 8,050 102,800

1.1.3 Principal Investigators (National) 60,642 91,733 111,226 32,237 295,838

1.1.4 Consultants 9,266 10,266 5,000 - 24,532

1.1.5 Support Staff 18,924 34,772 30,768 14,920 99,384

1.1.6 Other Project Participants -

1.2 TRAVEL AND ACCOMMODATION

1.2.1 Project Leader 300 1,800 300 300 2,700

1.2.2 Principal Investigators (Int'L & Reg'l) 4,000 5,000 6,000 2,000 17,000

1.2.3 Principal Invest igators (National) 980 2,480 1,050 990 5,500

1.2.4 Consultants -1.2.5 Support Staff 200 200 200 200 800

1.2.6 Other Project Participants -

2 RESEARCH OPERATION

2.1 EQUIPMENT

2.1.1 Office equipment 6,000 6,000

2.1.2 Laboratory equipment -

2.1.3 Field equipment 2,000 1,000 3,000

2.2 CONSUMABLES

2.2.1 General communication expenses 1,000 1,500 1,500 500 4,500

2.2.2 Office supplies -

2.2.3 Laboratory supplies 200 200 4002.2.4 Field research supplies -

2.2.5 Other support services (IT services, public

areas, facilities) 4,940 8,880 7,360 1,340 22,520

2.3 COMMUNICATIONS

2.3.1 Communications products 2,215 2,945 3,366 1,500 10,026

2.3.2 Team meetings 500 500 500 500 2,000

2.3.3 Stakeholders workshops 2,500 2,500 2,500 7,500

2.3.4 Participation in Reflection Workshops 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 20,000

2.3.5 Participation in IFWF3 and IFWF4 15,000 15,000 30,000

3 LUMP SUM CONTRACT AGREEMENTS FOR SPECIFIC DELIVERABLES

3.1 [INSERT NAME OF SUPPLIER -

3.2 -

3.3 -

4 MISCELLANEOUS

4.1 CONTINGENCY (% OF BUDGET) -

4.2 OVERHEADS 9,553 16,970 11,503 3,225 41,250

IWMI (21%) 9,553 16,970 11,503 3,225 41,250

[INSTITUTION (% ] -

[INSTITUTION (% ] -

[INSTITUTION (% ] -

[INSTITUTION (% ] -

TOTAL REQUESTED FROM CPWF 185,320 274,106 274,133 91,442 825,000

* The overheads of IWM, IWFM-BUET and BWDB are included in personnel costs

Assessment of the impact of anticipated external drivers of change on water resources of the

coastal zone

April 12, 2011

CPWF Project Workbook Budget Summary Page 36 of 44


37/44

Budget CommentsPlease provide as much information as possible to enable a good understanding of the key expenditures required.

Project Name

Assessment of the impact of anticipated external drivers of

change on water resources of the coastal zone

Date

COMMENTS

MATCHING FUND (if any)

1

PERSONNEL REMUNERATION, TRAVEL AND

ACCOMMODATION

1.1 PERSONNEL

1.1.1 Project Leader Salary for analysing model results,guiding and supervising the

research team, preparation of communication materials,

Dissemination of the results to stakeholders, interaction

meetings, quality control, report writing, attending workshops

1.1.2 Principal Investigators (Int'L & Reg'l) Salary for modelling, generating cross-boundary flow,

assessment of effect of climate change and landuse on water

flow, research quality control, interaction meetings, report

writing

1.1.3 Principal Investigators (National) Salary for literature review, simulation of different scenarios,

report writing, interaction meetings, attending workshops

1.1.4 Consultants Remuneration for consultancy (such as evaluating socio-

ecomics of the local people, genrating future scenarios and so

on)

1.1.5 Support Staff Salary for data collection and processing, development of

models, processing of model results, preparation of

communication materials, preparation of GIS maps

1.1.6 Other Project Participants

1.2 TRAVEL AND ACCOMMODATION

1.2.1 Project Leader field visits, visit to Indian part of the Ganges Basin, attending

interaction meetings with different organizations, air ticket,

transport, accomodation, per diem

1.2.2 Principal Investigators (Int'L & Reg'l) field visits, attending interaction meetings with different

organizations, air ticket, transport, hotel fare, per diem,

attending inception workshop1.2.3 Principal Investigators (National) field visits, visit to Indian part of the Ganges Basin, attending

interaction meetings with different organizations, air ticket,

transport, accomodation, per diem

1.2.4 Consultants

1.2.5 Support Staff field visits, transport, accomodation, per diem

1.2.6 Other Project Participants

CPWF Project Workbook Budget Comments Page 37 of 44


38/44

2 RESEARCH OPERATION

2.1 EQUIPMENT

2.1.1 Office equipment Software rental

2.1.2 Laboratory equipment

2.1.3 Field equipment Rental of ADCP, DGPS, Echo Sounder

2.2 CONSUMABLES2.2.1 General communication expenses Meetings, fax, email, telephone

2.2.2 Office supplies

2.2.3 Laboratory supplies Sediment laboratory tests

2.2.4 Field research supplies

2.2.5 Other support services (IT services, public

areas, facilities)

Rental for computer, printer, plotter, and database

development, Research coordination and quality control,

research support

2.3 COMMUNICATIONS

2.3.1

Communications products Reports, maps, charts and other communication materials

2.3.2 Team meetings Meetings with national and international researchers

2.3.3 Stakeholders workshops Organizing workshops involving stakeholders

2.3.4 Participation in Reflection Workshops Participation by national and international researchers

2.3.5 Participation in IFWF3 and IFWF4 Participation, air tickets, hotel fare, per diem

3

LUMP SUM CONTRACT AGREEMENTS FOR

SPECIFIC DELIVERABLES

3.1 [INSERT NAME OF SUPPLIER

3.2

3.3

4 MISCELLANEOUS

4.1 CONTINGENCY (% OF BUDGET)

4.2

OVERHEADS overhead costs for IWMI is included in this section. The

overheads of IWM, IWFM-BUET and BWDB are included in

personnel costs.

IWMI (21%) Institutional overheads

[INSTITUTION (% ]

[INSTITUTION (% ]

[INSTITUTION (% ]

[INSTITUTION (% ]

CPWF Project Workbook Budget Comments Page 38 of 44


39/44

Staff Time Allocation and Breakdown of Personnel Costs

Project Name

Date

1.1.1 Project

Leader

Zahirul Haque Khan IWM RO Guide and supervise the activities oprofessionals, ensure the quality of

research activities and outputs, res

for identification of external driver

devising potential scenarios, involv

caibration and validation of differe

models and simulation of scenarios

responsible for establishing linkage

other projects and partners, report

responsible for personal & project

discussion and interaction meeting

dessimination of research results

1.1.2 PI (Int'l) Bharat R. Sharma IWMI CGIAR Guide and supervise the ssessmentcross-boundary floe, impact of land

water resources, review of model r

and reports

Luna Bharati IWMI CGIAR Identification of external drivers,development of scenarios base on

drivers, collection of data and cont

in reports for the Indian part of the

basin, effect of cross-boundary flow

assessment of effect of glacier melt

precipitation on cross- boundary flo

to climate change, assessment of th

effect of land-use change on water

resources interaction with G2 and G

planning of cropping system and w

governance, contribution to prepar

annual and final reports on researc

findings

Yann Chemin IWMI CGIAR Model development calibration anvalidation using SWAT and WEAP,

simulation of baseline conditions a

climate change scenarios to assess

boundary flow, effects of land-use

climate change

Assessment of the impact of anticipated external drivers of change on water resource

the coastal zone

April 12, 2011

Brief Description of Contributio

Project, as described in G1 Con

(Project Workbook)

No. Personnel Name Institution Type of Institution


40/44

Brief Description of Con

Project, as described in G

(Project Workbo


1.1.3 PI (Nat'l) Abu Saleh Khan IWM RO Quality control, supervise thGIS maps on inundation dep

zoning map and storm surge

contributing the praparion o

reports, quality control of ou

A. H. M Kausher IWM RO Review of literature, collectiinfromation, assessment of

drainage congestion, salinity

bseline condition, maintaini

local stakeholders, BWDB, L

Manjur Morshed Zahid Ahmed IWM RO Review of available literaturinduced storm surge risk, as

baseline condition on storm

inundation, assessment of im

climate change on storm sur

reporting and documentatio

Rubayat Alam IWM RO Carrying out sediment modeassessment of sedimentatio

peripherial rivers of the sele

baseline condition and for e

Md. Mobassarul Hasan IWM RO Carrying out drainage modecalibration and validation of

Preparation of drainage and

map

Shume Akhter IWM RO Carrying out water flow and modelling, calibration and v

model, Preparation of salinit

Farhana Akhter Kamal IWM RO Water flow, salinity, drainagbaseline condition and exte

Mahendra Chandra Dey IWM RO Economic analysis

M. Shah Alam Khan IWFM-BUET RO Literature review on externaclimate change and water m

supervise the climate chang

using RCM, contributing in s

external drivers, Review of d

salinity, sediment and storm

modelling results, documen

A. K. M. Saiful Islam IWFM-BUET RO Selection of RCMs, selectionsimulation of climate chang

calibration and validation of

assessment of climate chang


41/44

Brief Description of Con

Project, as described in G

(Project Workbo


Mohammad Asad Hussain IWFM-BUET RO Literature review selection ochange scenario, contributio

change, water flow, storm-s

sediment modelling

Md Mahfuzur Rahman BWDB GO Identification of external driof field data and informationoffices, review of results on


storm-surge inundation, net

BWDB, LGED and MoWR

Sarafat Hossain Khan BWDB GO Identification of external driof field data and information

offices, review of results on



BWDB, LGED and MoWR

Saleh Ahmed BWDB GO Identification of external driof field data and information

offices, review of results on



BWDB, LGED and MoWR

1.1.4 Consultants Consultant IWMI CGIAR Consultation

Consultants Consultant

IWM

RO Social Consultation

1.1.5 Support

Staff

Junior Researcher IWM ROData preapation and process

field data and modelling res

Junior Researcher IWM ROData preparation and proces

of field data and modelling r

Mid-level Researcher IWM RO Surveying and data collectioprocessing

GIS Specialist IWM RO GIS maps for the outputs

GIS Specialist IWM RO GIS maps for the outputs

Data Analyst IWM RO Data entry, word processingformatting of reports

1.1.6 Other

Project

Participants


42/44

Indicative Breakdown of Budget by Output

Project Name

Date

Output Institution $ value of the budget % share of the budget

IWM 24750.00 3.00%

IWMI 12375.00 1.50%

IWFM-BUET 2062.50 0.25%

BWDB 2062.50 0.25%

Total for Output 1 41250.00 5.00%

IWM 4950.00 0.60%

IWMI 4950.00 0.60%

IWFM-BUET 12375.00 1.50%

BWDB 2475.00 0.30%


IWM 12375.00 1.50%

IWMI 12375.00 1.50%IWFM-BUET 33000.00 4.00%

BWDB 0.00%


IWM 38362.50 4.65%

IWMI 5775.00 0.70%

IWFM-BUET 4950.00 0.60%

BWDB 8662.50 1.05%


IWM 8250.00 1.00%

IWMI 33000.00 4.00%

IWFM-BUET 0.00%

BWDB 0.00%


IWM 16500.00 2.00%

IWMI 82500.00 10.00%

IWFM-BUET 0.00%

BWDB 0.00%


IWM 77962.50 9.45%

IWMI 17325.00 2.10%

IWFM-BUET 3712.50 0.45%

BWDB 0.00%

Total for Output 7 99000.00 12.00%IWM 127875.00 15.50%

IWMI 8250.00 1.00%

IWFM-BUET 4125.00 0.50%

BWDB 0.00%


Output No. 7: Flow availability

(present and future conditions)

Output No. 8: Salinity zoning map




Output No. 1: List of key external

drivers

Output No. 2: Literature review

Output No. 3: Climate change

projections

Output No. 6: Effect of land-use

change and climate change on water

resources

Output No. 5: Cross-boundary flow


Output No. 4: Processed primary and

secondary data

April 12, 2011

CPWF Project Workbook Indicative Breakdown of Budget by Output Page 42 of 44


43/44

Project Name

Date

Output Institution $ value of the budget % share of the budget



April 12, 2011

IWM 44550.00 5.40%

IWMI 0.00%

IWFM-BUET 4950.00 0.60%

BWDB 0.00%


IWM 51975.00 6.30%

IWMI 9900.00 1.20%

IWFM-BUET 4125.00 0.50%

BWDB 0.00%


IWM 13200.00 1.60%

IWMI 0.00%

IWFM-BUET 3300.00 0.40%

BWDB 0.00%Total for Output 11 16500.00 2.00%

IWM 36300.00 4.40%

IWMI 0.00%

IWFM-BUET 4950.00 0.60%

BWDB 0.00%


IWM 12375.00 1.50%

IWMI 4950.00 0.60%

IWFM-BUET 0.00%

BWDB 7425.00 0.90%


IWM 12375.00 1.50%

IWMI 4950.00 0.60%

IWFM-BUET 0.00%

BWDB 7425.00 0.90%


IWM 21450.00 2.60%

IWMI 9900.00 1.20%

IWFM-BUET 4950.00 0.60%

BWDB 4950.00 0.60%


TOTAL 825000.00 100%

Output No. 15: Bi-annual reports and

workshops

Output No. 13: Plan for improvement

of khal system, sluices and

embankments (present and future

conditions)

Output No. 14: Operation rules for

sluices (present and future

conditions)

Output No. 9: Storm surge risk map


Output No. 10: Flood inundation

depth-duration map for polders 3, 31

and 43/2F (present and future

conditions)

Output No. 11: Water storage volume

inside polders 3, 31 and 43/2F


Output No. 12: Sedimentation rate in

peripheral rivers of polders 3, 31 and

43/2F (present and future conditions)

CPWF Project Workbook Indicative Breakdown of Budget by Output Page 43 of 44


44/44

Indicative Breakdown of Budget by Institution

Project Name

Date

Institution Total $ value Total % share Comments

IWM 514,005 62%IWMI 206,250 25%

IWFM-BUET 71,745 9% The IWFM expenses for travel &accomodation and participation in IFWF (Total

$10,755) will be paid from IWM budget

BWDB 33,000 4% The BWDB expenses for travel &accomodation and participation in IFWF (Total

$6,000) will be paid from IWM budget

TOTAL 825,000 100%



April 12, 2011

* IWFM-BUET and BWDB team preferred their expense for travelling and participation in IFWF3 and IFWF4

to be born by IWM due to their administrative difficulties.

G4-Annex2 Updated Workbook

Documents

Transcript of G4-Annex2 Updated Workbook