G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
Transcript of G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
1/24
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
2/24
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
3/24
PART A: SUMMARY (Maximum 1 page)
1. Project Data
BDC: Ganges Basin
Project Title: G3: Water governance and community-based management
Project Lead Organization: IWMI
Consortium partners (who receive budget): Socioconsult Ltd; IWM; Bangladesh Agriculture
University (BAU), Mymensingh (through a MOU that will support BAU students to do their
Masters thesis under the project)
Consortium partners who do not receive direct budget support, but are involved in advisory
and next user roles: Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB), Local GovernmentEngineering Department (LGED), Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE) and Department
of Fisheries (DOF)
Project Leader (name and contact details): Aditi Mukherji, IWMI, New Delhi
Duration: 3 years
Target start date: April 2011
Finish date (not later than 30 April 2014): 25th April 2014
Maximum budget requested from CPWF (in US$): 1.2 millionAny matching funds offered (provide brief explanation): No
2. Project Summary
Inundation and severe flooding in the coastal areas is a frequent occurrence in Bangladesh.
This leads to loss of life and property as well as severe impacts on livelihoods. The government
of Bangladesh has been investing steadily in coastal zone management through construction
d h bilit ti f ld Thi j t i b t t d it b d
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
4/24
community governance issues of two BWDB polders and 2 LGED sub-projects and do a detailed
study on pros and cons of community management of polders. Phase III will run concurrently
with Phase I and Phase II and we will do training and capacity activities in this phase. The mainoutput of the project will be generation of knowledge aimed at sustaining high levels of polder
governance through community participation.
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
5/24
PART B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Section 3 10: maximum 10 pages)
3. BDC Goals to which the project will contribute
The overall BDC goal is to reduce poverty, improve food security and strengthen livelihood
resilience in coastal areas through improved water governance and management, and more
productive and diversified farm systems. Within this broad BDC goal, the specific objective of this
project is to improve water governance and management of coastal polders. It is hypothesized
that polders where proper governance systems are in place and where the community is directly
involved in such governance are better managed than polders where such governance systems and
community involvement is absent. Better governed polders, in turn, will have better outcomes in
terms of food security and livelihood benefits and will, in the process, contribute to building up
longer term resilience among the communities who live in coastal areas in Bangladesh.
4. Research questions and methodologies
This project is about water governance and community based management of polders in salinity
affected coastal zones in Bangladesh. The challenges facing the polder communities are complex
and similar to those faced by many communities in which water is used for multiple purposes. But
unlike other multiple use systems (such as canals, tanks), where there is rarely ever a
commonality in interest, in case of polder communities, the fear that these polders may breach
during a natural calamity and cause damage to life and property makes it easier to bring about a
di f it ti H b d thi lit th iti f
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
6/24
6. How can institutional arrangements best be improved for water management within polders?
7. How does organizational differences in BWDB and LGED towards community management
affect actual outcomes in the field?
8. How can community-based management reduce vulnerability?
9. What tools and information are needed to support community decision making?
The six original questions of this call, plus the two derived ones can be categorized in two groups:
1) questions that ask who and which, followed by 2) questions that ask how and what. The
who and which questions help define the problem of water governance in polders (questions 1
and 2), while the how and what questions (questions 3 to 9) seek to enhance understanding of
governance mechanisms and describe helpful approaches to resolving governance challenges.
Given the different nature of questions, we will adopt a three phase approach. In phase 1 (also
called Work Package 1), we will answer the who and which questions using a broader sample of
5 BWDB polders and 4 LGED sub-projects. This is the situation analysis phase of the project and
will take place in the first year of the project (2011-2012). This will enable us to understand the
different uses of water in polders, the conflicting interests arising thereof and the different
governance mechanisms that are in place to manage these conflicts and their comparativeadvantage and disadvantages. In Phase II (Work Package 2), we will answer the how and what
questions. The duration of this phase is also one year (2012-2013). This is the diagnostic phase of
the project. Results from Phase I and Phase II of the project will feed into the Phase III of the
project, i.e. Capacity Building and Experience sharing with polder communities and local
government institutions (2013-2014). We give a broad brush picture of the methodology to be
followed in each of the phases. Detailed methodology for Phase I will be reported in Inception
R hil h d il d h d l f Ph II ill b d i A l R 2011 2012
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
7/24
3. We will conduct field visits at 9 polder sites of BWDB and LGED and approximately 36 villages
located within these polders (described in next section) to produce baseline situation analysis and
influence-interest matrices that enable us to assess what works and does not work in the polder
communities. Polders will be chosen on a number of criteria such as extent of salinity, IPSWAM
and SSWRDP intervention in terms of community building, accessibility and availability of IRRI and
BRAC panel data. There will be a situation analysis for each polder as well as a synthesis report of
these. The situation analysis helps us understand what the burning issues and problems are in
each of the polders, the potential solutions and if there are any community management or any
other formal or informal management structures for managing polders/subprojects. It will also
look at what happens when communities are engaged and what happens when they are not, as
well as why they are engaged in some polders and not in others. The situation analysis will bebased on participatory mapping of the state of infrastructure, Focus Group Discussions (FGD),
interviews with individuals (government officials and those who have court cases pending for
illegal cuts in the embankment), as well as qualitative and quantitative surveys. Through this
methodology we will have gained information on three different typologies; infrastructure, nature
of problems and institutions.
a. Infrastructure. Participatory mapping conducted by Socioconsult Ltd will help us develop atypology of infrastructure, whether it is good, mediocre or poor, the relative performancesof large versus small-scale infrastructure as well as the purpose of the infrastructure.
b. Problem delineation. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) will be conducted with communitymembers, both men and women as well as with elected representatives of local
government institutions, upazila samities, and officials of the water management groups
(WMGs) and federated water management associations (WMAs). The FGDs, interviews
and surveys have been designed to investigate the nature of problems in each polder and
h f l i f l i i i h h ld I i i i h j
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
8/24
In sum, the methodology for G3 consists of a combination of qualitative methods and
questionnaire surveys, though the emphasis will be on qualitative methods in the first phase.
These include literature reviews, FGDs (with WMAs and WMGs in project areas, in non -project
areas, members of LGI; Union Parishad members and general community), PRAs, questionnaire
surveys and in-depth expert interviews. The main output will be situation analysis (one per
polder), a synthesis report and an interest-influence matrix analysis in the first phase.
Phase II: Community governance mechanisms in a few selected polders (May 2012-October
2013)
For answering he how and what questions (Questions 3 to 8), such as how are the poldersgoverned and what can be done to make such governance structures equitable and efficient we
will choose 9 polders (two IPSWAM, one KJDRP, one Fourth Fisheries Project and one general
polder of BWDB, and 4 SSWRDP polders of LGED) and do a comparative analysis using a
combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods. This component of the study will
build upon situation analysis and diagnostic studies of the first phase and also make use of
previous studies by IPSWAM, KJDRP, Fourth Fisheries and SSRDP.
We will use Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework for our analysis. Drawing on
various disciplines such as political science, economics, anthropology, game theory and law,
researchers studying common property resources (CPR) have developed IAD framework (Ostrom
1990) This framework attempts to identify key working parts of typical situations facing
participants in various circumstances (Tang, 1992:13). Oakerson (1986) outlines a triadic
interaction framework which analyzes the physical attributes of the resource, the community
ib f h l i h d h ib f h i i i h h b
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
9/24
students from Bangladesh Agricultural University under the overall guidance of their professors
and IWMI scientists.
Detailed research method for this phase of the study will be finalized only after the Phase I of the
project and will be documented in the First Year Annual Report (2011-2012). But given thecomprehensive, yet, wide ranging nature of the questions, our methods will be eclectic and
involve qualitative instruments such as, FGDs, key informant interviews, discourse analysis,
stakeholder analysis and PRAs, as well as quantitative methods including econometric analysis and
rigorous impact evaluations. We will therefore adopt a mixed method approach and respond to
questions using appropriate tools.
Phase III: Capacity building and experience sharing (August 2012 to April 2014)
This phase will go concurrently with Phase II and will run exclusively in the last six months of the
project. It will be devoted to capacity building and experience sharing. We will create a platform
for collecting and disseminating information and knowledge of polder governance issues. We will
invite all stakeholders directly involved in the construction and management of polders in
Bangladesh (government officials, NGOs, WMAs and WMGs) to join the new Polder Alliance for
Learning and Management- Bangladesh (PALM-Bangladesh). Capacity building activities will becarried out through execution of a refresher course on management of polders in the IPSWAM
project areas and brief training courses and meetings in non-IPSWAM project areas to acquaint
these communities about the work carried out in IPSWAM polders and its overall impact. Another
training course will focus on the local decision makers such as members of LGIs and Union
Parishad members where we will share our experience of community participation in project
polders with them. Training courses will also be held in collaboration with G2 component on the
h l (b h d f h) h h ll d l f h
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
10/24
In 1975, with Dutch assistance, BWDB started the Early Implementation Project (EIP). The projects
had mainly a rehabilitation and relief character. They needed comparatively limited technical
preparation and could therefore, in theory, start early and hence the name. Over the years, the
Early Implementation Project has implemented 88 schemes in various regions of Bangladesh,covering an area of 463,250 ha. The implemented schemes consisted of the development of low-
lying basins (haors) and polders through the excavation of canals, construction of sluices, closures,
and embankments. In this project, the emphasis was on physical construction of new
infrastructure and rehabilitation of existing ones, though community participation concepts like
embankment management groups and landless labour cooperative society (LCS) were introduced
for the first time in this project. This later became a blue print for IPSWAM project.
This was followed by a Delta Development Project in 1976. This was limited to polder areas in
Bangladesh and its initial aim was to establish three empoldering projects of a representative
nature for different water zones: the saline water zone, the fresh water zone, and the transition
zone. Their problems and consequently the development strategies were different. The
development programme of the project also included technical and socio-economic elements.
Due to financial constraints, the project was implemented in one polder (polder 22) in Khulna.
The third polder related project was the Land Reclamation Project (LRP), also implemented by the
BWDB. This involved reclamation of new land by dam construction across tidal rivers. A pilot
polder was developed in Char Baggar Dona, including the settlement of several thousand
extremely poor landless people on newly accreted land. This achieved long-term success.
By the end of LRP, in 1991, both the Government of Bangladesh and the Netherlands, in
f h h h
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
11/24
In addition to BWDB, the Local Government Engineering Department (LGED) too has been
implementing a number of projects in coastal zones in Bangladesh. For over 10 years, LGED has
been implementing the small scale water resources development sector project (SSWRDSP) with
the participation of stakeholders in developing small-scale water resources in the country. Thefirst phase of the Project was from 1995 to 2002, and the second phase from 2002 to 2009. This
project has a major community participation component and established 129,000 Water
Management Cooperative Associations (WMCA) during the project period.
To respond to the need of integrated program for coastal management, the water resources
planning organization (WARPO) implemented the Integrated Coastal Zone Management Plan
Project (ICZMP). The Government of the Netherlands, along with the Governments of the U.K. andBangladesh, has supported this 4-year project up to December 2005. The contribution of the
project can be summarized in presenting the country with milestone documents like the Coastal
Zone Policy 2005, Coastal Development Strategy and a Priority Investment Programme. These
documents were based on thorough understanding of coastal livelihoods, institutional
environment and knowledge base.
Integrated Planning for Sustainable Water Management (IPSWAM) focuses on communityinvolvement in polder management. It took lessons from the earlier projects, especially EIP,
System Rehabilitation project (SRP), SSWRDSP and CDSP projects. One of the main objectives of
IPSWAM is to strengthen O&M through the transfer of its responsibilities from central (BWDB) to
local level and the establishment of sustainable mechanisms at polder levels. The IPSWAM project
was started in 2003 with the goal of strengthening the capacity of water sector organisations,
including local level WMOs, the different offices of the BWDB (headquarters and regional/local
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
12/24
6. Links to other BDC projects.
Research outputs Dependencies on other
BDC projects to
produce it
Use of research output
by other BDC projects
Risks and
assumptions
Literature review
on coastal zone
management
(CZM) policiesand institutions in
Bangladesh
None G5: Preparation of short
brochure or
communication
materials
None
Detailed polder
level institutions,
policies and
governance
reports for 6polders
G1 and G4: Provide
geo-referenced data;
and maps for village
selection within polders
and baselineinformation including
polder and village level
demographic, land use
information
G2: Information on
their actual or planned
G1: For extrapolation of
technology adoption
domains
G2: Plan for up-scalingof technology and
stakeholders
acceptance of
technology
G3 will produce
preliminary report for 3
Assumptions: We get
maps and baseline
information from G1
and G4 on time.
Risks: Natural
calamity and or
political unrest may
delay our work.
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
13/24
G5: Disseminate our
results
Development oftraining modules
and refresher
courses
G1, G2, G4 and G5share their findings till
Aug 2013 so that we
can incorporate those
in our training modules
All packages will benefitfrom this.
Same as above
Scientific articles
and book
chapters from allabove outputs
None All projects Same as above
7. Suggested sites
We will do study at two levels. In phase I, we will work in 9 polders and do a detailed situation
analysis of existing institutional and governance mechanisms and their outcomes in 9 polders in
Bangladesh. Our study polders will be in Barisal and Khulna division. The polders and Sub-projectschosen for this phase are:
i. Polder 3 (BWDB Div-I, Satkhira / Kaliganj & Devhata UZs of Satkhira Dist.)
ii. Polder 30 (BWDB Div-II, Khulna / Bagerhat UZ of Khulna Dist.)
iii. Polder 43/2F (BWDB Div, Barguna / Amtali UZ of Barguna Dist.)
iv. Polder 31 (BWDB Div-II, Khulna / Dakop UZ of Khulna Dist.)
v. Polder 24 (WMA G of KJDRP) (BWDB Div-II, Khulna / Dumuria UZ of Khulna Dist.)
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
14/24
b. Also map, as best as possible, all illegal or informal structures such as pipes,embankment cut etc. It may be possible to do it quite well in LGED sub-projects, but
not necessarily possible to the same extent of accuracy in BWDB Polders. In case
of BWDB polders, collect this information from the local BWDB office, if available.
c. Identify physical condition of the infrastructure. This will involve field inspectioncarried out jointly by a social scientist and an engineer and in consultation with local
people who live near those structures. Through physical inspection, identify and
colour code (green = good, yellow = minor problem, red = major problem) along
with exact description of the problem for
i. Peripheral embankmentii. Drainage and flushing sluices and regulator structures.
iii. For internal drainage canal, physical inspection is not needed, instead try andget an overall picture through consultation.
2. Qualitative survey: Problem identificationa. FGDs
i. General stakeholders meeting comprising of members and non-members ofWMOs will be conducted in all polders/subproject. We envisage a maximum
of 60 FGDs in all 9 polders. General stakeholder FGDs will be done at sub-
subsystem level. Subsystems will be identified as a part of participatory
mapping exercise. FGDs will identify issue of institutions, role and level of
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
15/24
iii. Interviews with government officials to investigate the perspectives ofimplementing agencies and local governments on polder management.
3. Quantitative survey:A quantitative survey will be conducted in each polder. A sample of roughly 1500 will be
covered in the survey: 200 in 4 LGED polders and 1,300 in BWDB polders. Actual
number to be surveyed will be decided only after rigorous calculation of statistically
significant sample size. Among others, the following issues will be covered in the survey.
a. Land ownership and land tenancy informationb. Cropping information, including fishc. Cost of cultivationd. Drought and water-logging problemse. Problems of crops in stress-prone environmentf. Institutional aspects
These surveys will pave the way for simple experimental games that we will play with villagers in
our study villages. The purpose of these games will be to understand the impediments to forging
cooperative strategies in our polders and sub-projects.
10. Communications
IWMI has set up a triple approach to the uptake of its research results. This includes building
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
16/24
A national level steering committee will be formed for smooth implementation of the project. The
members of this committee will include key staff from G3 and G2 and nominees of the next user
organizations such as BWDB, LGED, DAE and DOF. The purpose of this steering committee will be
two fold. First, it will provide a platform for oversight of the project and make sure that G3produces outputs in a timely manner such that its outputs can be used by other projects,
particularly G2. Second, the government officials in this committee will take part in project
meetings and field visits and will help in uptake of results in their respective departments. For this
purpose, IWMI will sign a LOA with government partners.
The communication products will include:
- At least three journal articles and several policy briefs (in English and Bangla) characterizingactors, institutions and governance structures in selected polders along with an analysis of what
kind of governance structure work, why and why not and what needs to be done to sustain
community involvement in polder management.
- Two, more detailed reports covering these same aspects, one of each of the two polders which
will be studied in detail in Phase II of the projects.
- Short, journalistic articles summarizing project findings, for national Bangla media
- Revised training modules and creation of short training module (with help from G5) to
disseminate our findings.
- Process and outcome documentation of training and capacity building meetings
- A suite of popular communication products in multiple media (posters, short video clips) in local
languages, relating key messages on polder governance that can be used in extension programs of
government, NGOs, and community-based networks, and also reproduced or broadcast through
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
17/24
PART C: CONSORTIUM DETAILS, INDICATIVE BUDGET AND REFERENCES
(Section 11-13)
11. Consortium Details
Lead Institution
IWMI has 25 years of experience of working on water governance and community based
management of irrigation schemes. IWMI is recognized as a pioneer of Irrigation Management
Transfer (IMT) and Participatory Irrigation Management (PIM) research research that deals withcommunity participation in irrigation schemes. The recently concluded Ganges Basin Focal Project
was implemented by IWMI in partnership with World Fish Centre and several other organizations
in Bangladesh. In this project, we carried out studies on water, crop and fisheries in Bangladesh.
CPWF funded PN 42 (Groundwater Governance in the Indo-Gangetic Basin) had a Bangladesh
component where we looked at socio-economic and governance aspects of groundwater in
Madaripur district in Bangladesh. This district lies within the slightly saline zone and is a part of
the Ganges BDC study area. In early 2000s, IWMI had carried out a series of studies on adoption ofsmall scale irrigation technologies (treadle pumps etc.) in Bangladesh. Currently we are also
working on two projects in West Bengal, India. One is a Gates funded project on Agricultural
Water Management Solutions in West Bengal and another is DFID funded project on impact of
electricity policies on water use. As a part of CPWF projects (PN 10), IWMI worked in partnership
with IRRI in coastal saline water environments in Vietnam and Bangladesh. This will complement
our ongoing projects on evaluation of community action in irrigation and water management in
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
18/24
Development and Settlement Project (CDSP) under Meghna Basin, for last six years together
partners.
Socioconsult was involved in the Challenge Programme on Water and Food (CPWF-10), a researchinitiative on rice and aquaculture, was initiated by IRRI in Bangladesh and Vietnam. It was one of
the local partners of this project in Bangladesh, other partners being BRRI, BFRI, BWDB, LGED,
HEED-Bangladesh. The role of Socioconsult in this research initiative consisted in assisting IRRI in
field survey in coastal regions of Bangladesh, and analysis and interpretation of the socio-
economic data collected.
Socioconsult was involved in a number of research surveys. Some of the important projects were:1) household level survey in 62 villages under 62 Upazilas all over the country 4 times so far to
create panel data for IRRI, IPFRI, BIDS and BRAC since 1999; 2) Baseline Survey and Impact
Assessment of Aquaculture Extension and Smallholder Livestock Development Project-2: Focusing
on Poverty Reduction for DANIDA during 1998-2002; 3) Qualitative assessment for Haor
Infrastructure and Livelihood Improvement Project (HILIP) funded by IFAD in 2010.
A major project that Socioconsult is currently managing is a study project for poverty tracking,Village Dynamics in South Asia (VDSA); it is a part of a greater study in the South Asia jointly
coordinated by ICRISAT and IRRI and funded by BMGF. Socioconsult is also collaborating with the
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), CIMMYT and WorldFish to implement a research
project entitled Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA). It involves both village and
household level qualitative, quantitative and thematic surveys in each cropping season.
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
19/24
Institution 3: Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh
Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU) is the premier seat of higher agricultural education and
research in the country. Its scholastic activities cover all the domains of agricultural sciences
having direct bearing on terrestrial and aquatic productivity. The University was established as the
nation's only University of its kind in session 1961-62 on the basis of recommendations made by
the Commission of National Education and the Food and Agriculture Commission in 1959. The
Scheme for the establishment of BAU was finalized on 8 june 1961 and its ordinance was
promulgated on 18 August 1961. With the appointment of its first Vice-Chancellor, the universityformally came into existance on 2 September 1961 and started functioning with the College of
Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry (CVSAH) at Mymensingh as its nucleus.
The main task of the university is to tone up the quality and standard of higher agricultural
education and to produce first-rate agriculturists, agricultural scientists and researchers for
shouldering the responsibilities of agricultural development of the country. It is a residential
university mandated for offering for higher education and research in agriculture and all of itsbranches including conduct of examinations, conferment of degrees and granting affiliation.
To achieve the objectives over 90 percent of the recurring budget and the entire development
fund come from the government through University Grants Commission (UGC).
BAU has been the principal supplier of skilled human capital for modernizing our national
agriculture since its establishment in 1961. And yet it has a long way to go ahead. It is our vision to
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
20/24
Indicative Breakdown of Budget by Institution
Project Name
Date
Institution Total $ value Total % share Comments
IWMI 714,667 60%
Socioconsult 300,000 25%
IWM 30,225 3%LumpSum Contractors 120,000 10%
CPWF 35,000 3%
0%
TOTAL 1,199,892 1
G3: Water Governance and Community Based Management
Indicative Breakdown of Budget by OutputBudget does include overhead costs
Project NameDate
Output Institution $ value of the budget % share of the budget
IWMI 142,933 12%
Socioconsult 60,000 5%
IWM 6,045 1%
LumpSum Contractors 24,000 2%
0%
Total for Output 1 232,978 19%
G3: Water Governance and Community Based Management
Output No. 1: Phase I Situation Analysi s
Reports (6 reports plus one
consolidated report). 20% of budget
12. Indicative breakdown of budget
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
21/24
13. Bibliography
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Tang, S. Y. 1992. Institutions and collective action: self-governance in irrigation. San Francisco, CA,
USA: ICS Press. xvi, 151p.
Oakerson, R.J., 1986,A Model for the Analysis of Common Property Resource Management,
National Academy Press.
Clement, F. (2010) 'Analysing Decentralised Natural Resource Governance: Proposition for a
"politicised" IAD framework', Policy Sciences, 43, (2), pp. 129-156.
Ismail, A.M. (2009). Development of technologies to harness the productivity potential of salt-affected areas of the Indo-Gangetic, Mekong, and Nile River basins, CPWF Project Report, PN
#7, June 2009, 106 pages.
Tuong, T.P. & C.T. Hoanh (2009), Managing Water and Land Resources for Sustainable Livelihoods
at the Interface between Fresh and Saline Water Environments in Vietnam and Bangladesh,
CPWF Project Report, PN #10, June 2009, 93 pages.
Islam, M.N., J.R. Rinfret & Q.R. Islam (2010), Participatory management of coastal resources: a
case study of Baganchra-Badurgacha subproject in the south-west of Bangladesh, in Tropicaldeltas and coastal zones: Food production, communities and environment at the land-water
interface; Comprehensive Assessment of Agriculture Series, Volume 9. CAB International
2010: 335-349
Chowdhury, A.K.M., S.A.M. Jenkins and M. Hossain (2010), Assessing impact of small-scale coastal
embankments: a case study of an LGED polder in Bangladesh in Tropical deltas and coastal
zones: Food production, communities and environment at the land-water interface;
Comprehensive Assessment of Agriculture Series, Volume 9. CAB International 2010: 422-435
http://vlibrary.iwmi.org/dbtw-wpd/exec/dbtwpub.dll?AC=SEE_ALSO&QF0=AU&QI0==%22Tang,+S.+Y.%22&XC=/dbtw-wpd/exec/dbtwpub.dll&BU=http%3A%2F%2Fvlibrary.iwmi.org%2Findex.asp&TN=HQDOCS&SN=AUTO24612&SE=529&RN=14&MR=20&TR=0&TX=1000&ES=0&CS=1&XP=&RF=Std+full&EF=&DF=Std+full&RL=1&EL=0&DL=0&NP=1&ID=&MF=&MQ=&TI=0&DT=&ST=0&IR=9320&NR=0&NB=0&SV=0&SS=0&BG=&FG=&QS=Test_search&OEX=ISO-8859-1&OEH=ISO-8859-1http://vlibrary.iwmi.org/dbtw-wpd/exec/dbtwpub.dll?AC=SEE_ALSO&QF0=AU&QI0==%22Tang,+S.+Y.%22&XC=/dbtw-wpd/exec/dbtwpub.dll&BU=http%3A%2F%2Fvlibrary.iwmi.org%2Findex.asp&TN=HQDOCS&SN=AUTO24612&SE=529&RN=14&MR=20&TR=0&TX=1000&ES=0&CS=1&XP=&RF=Std+full&EF=&DF=Std+full&RL=1&EL=0&DL=0&NP=1&ID=&MF=&MQ=&TI=0&DT=&ST=0&IR=9320&NR=0&NB=0&SV=0&SS=0&BG=&FG=&QS=Test_search&OEX=ISO-8859-1&OEH=ISO-8859-1 -
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
22/24
Annex 1: Location of BWDB polders to be studied under G3 (highlighted in orange) and LGED sub-projects
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
23/24
-
7/31/2019 G3 Revised Proposal_Nov 2011
24/24