G. Martellotti1CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002 LHCb Category A M&O status for 2002 and estimate for 2003 Report...

9
G. Martellotti 1 CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002 LHCb Category A M&O status for 2002 and estimate for 2003 Report on Common Fund and CORE expenses for 2002-3 RRB Ott. 2002 A. Smith presenta per LHCb due documenti : 1 ) 2)

Transcript of G. Martellotti1CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002 LHCb Category A M&O status for 2002 and estimate for 2003 Report...

Page 1: G. Martellotti1CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002 LHCb Category A M&O status for 2002 and estimate for 2003 Report on Common Fund and CORE expenses for 2002-3 RRB Ott.

G. Martellotti 1CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002

LHCb

Category A M&O status for 2002 and estimate for 2003

Report on Common Fund and CORE expenses for 2002-3

RRB Ott. 2002

A. Smith presenta per LHCb due documenti :

1)

2)

Page 2: G. Martellotti1CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002 LHCb Category A M&O status for 2002 and estimate for 2003 Report on Common Fund and CORE expenses for 2002-3 RRB Ott.

G. Martellotti 2CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002

1) M&O categoria A

“During the RRB of November 2001, the budget for Category A M&O for this year and including the power costs was approved at the level of 371 KCHF. The power costs are only paid by Non-Member States and this meant that only about 336 KCHF was invoiced. The spending for this year is unlikely to exceed 250 KCHF mainly because the power and cooling costs for LHCb will not be in line with the estimates made in common for all four LHC experiments. In fact LHCb will not be charged for cooling (56K estimate) and will receive a very small bill for power compared with the 50 KCHF estimated.”

Spese 2002

(If funds are not used one year, they can be carried over for later years)

Page 3: G. Martellotti1CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002 LHCb Category A M&O status for 2002 and estimate for 2003 Report on Common Fund and CORE expenses for 2002-3 RRB Ott.

G. Martellotti 3CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002

UPS maintenance5

Secretariat 85Printing, Publications 35On-Call communications

7Test Beams 120Laboratory Operations

55Cooling & Ventilation 10General services

55Outreach 10Total 382 Power 120Grand Total 502

Revised estimate of M&O cat. A costs in 2003 kCHF

(lower estimate for cooling, ventilation…)

La vecchia stima era 660

Page 4: G. Martellotti1CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002 LHCb Category A M&O status for 2002 and estimate for 2003 Report on Common Fund and CORE expenses for 2002-3 RRB Ott.

G. Martellotti 4CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002

BRAZIL 3.65 3.98

IN2P3 FRANCE 10.68 11.93

BMBF GERMANY 3.65 4.26

MPG GERMANY 2.08 2.27

INFN ITALY 19.01 17.9

NETHERLANDS 4.69 4.83

P. R. CHINA 2.08 1.99

POLAND 5.47 3.69

ROMANIA 1.301.14

RUSSIA 8.33 9.09

SPAIN 3.39 4.26

SWITZERLAND 4.95 4.55

UKRAINE 2.34 2.56

UK 14.06 12.78

CERN 14.32 14.77

Funding Agency % Sharing 2002 % Sharing 2003

Percentages based on the name list used for the 2002

sharing and on the updated name list.

75 Phd

~ 51 Fisici equivalenti INFN

63 Phd

Page 5: G. Martellotti1CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002 LHCb Category A M&O status for 2002 and estimate for 2003 Report on Common Fund and CORE expenses for 2002-3 RRB Ott.

G. Martellotti 5CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002

BRAZIL 14 3.98% 15,193 4,773 19,966

CERN 52 14.77% 56,432 

CHINA 7 1.99% 7,597 2,386 9,983

FRANCE IN2P3 42 11.93% 45,580 

GERMANY BMBF 15 4.26% 16,278

GERMANY MPG 8 2.27% 8,682

ITALY INFN 63 17.90% 68,369 CHFNETHERLANDS 17 4.83% 18,449

POLAND 13 3.69% 14,108

ROMANIA 4 1.14% 4,341 1,364 5,705

RUSSIA 32 9.09% 34,727 9,098 43,825

SPAIN 15 4.26% 16,278

SWITZERLAND 16 4.55% 17,364

UK 45 12.78% 48,835

UKRAINE 9 2.56% 9,767 3,068 12,835

    TOTAL 352 100 382000

FUNDING AGENCY PhD Equiv % PhD contr. 2003 Power Total

Sharing of the contributions 2003

Page 6: G. Martellotti1CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002 LHCb Category A M&O status for 2002 and estimate for 2003 Report on Common Fund and CORE expenses for 2002-3 RRB Ott.

G. Martellotti 6CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002

Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Cat A 321 382 694 1132 2059 2497 Power 50 120 5 * 139 728 903 Total 371 502 699 1271 2787 3400

Previsioni riportate da A.S. all’ultimo CB

* (There are no magnet tests foreseen in 2004).

Situazione diversa da ATLAS e CMS

“Exp. Less advanced in detector construction can profit from the delay of LHC”

Previsioni vecchie e aggiornate nei documenti dello scrutiny group:

Page 7: G. Martellotti1CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002 LHCb Category A M&O status for 2002 and estimate for 2003 Report on Common Fund and CORE expenses for 2002-3 RRB Ott.

G. Martellotti 7CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002

2) Common Fund and CORE expenses

Common Fund 2002The main commitment of Common Funds for the current year is for the magnet. The actual amount that will be spent this year will be less than expected earlier due to delays in delivery of some items but an amount of about 1 MCHF could still be spent before the end of the year in addition to the items reported in the statement of account. The total of 4.6 MCHF foreseen for the magnet should all be spent by the end of 2003. Regarding the 1.5 MCHF expected to be committed for detectors this year, a commitment of 0.9 MCHF has recently been made for photomultipliers for the ECAL and HCAL and this added to other smaller commitments will mean that the 1.5 MCHF will be largely respected.  

Page 8: G. Martellotti1CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002 LHCb Category A M&O status for 2002 and estimate for 2003 Report on Common Fund and CORE expenses for 2002-3 RRB Ott.

G. Martellotti 8CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002

Situation for 2002

The calorimeter project is running to schedule and, of the 4.3 MCHF foreseen as this year’s funding, only the 400 KCHF for electronics will not be committed. The group took the decision to delay ordering their electronics, after the announcement of the delay to LHC start up, as the prices should become more favourable the later the items are ordered. This applies also to the 1 MCHF foreseen for electronics in 2003 that will also be spent later.

The 0.7 KCHF foreseen for RICH spending will not be committed this year as that project has been on hold as part of the LHCb light studies, though RICH 2 is now launching its procurement

2)

Situation for 2003 The expected spending of the detector groups, who have revised their planning following the year’s delay to LHC, amounts to about 10 MCHF in the year 2003. This is a bit less than the average that must be spent during each of the next five years.

CORE

Page 9: G. Martellotti1CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002 LHCb Category A M&O status for 2002 and estimate for 2003 Report on Common Fund and CORE expenses for 2002-3 RRB Ott.

G. Martellotti 9CSN1 14 / 10 / 2002

2) Common Fund and CORE expenses 2003 COMMON FUND

Calorimeters : 1.8 MCHFDAH : 0.06 MCHFInfrastructure : 0.6 MCHFMagnet : 1.6 MCHF

Calorimeters : 2.2 MCHF France, Romania, Russia, Spain ,

Ukraine, CERNMuon : 0.60 MCHF Brazil, Italy, Russia, CERNOuter Tracker : 1.22 MCHF China, Heidelberg (BMBF),

NIKHEF, Poland, CERNRICH : 0.94 MCHF Italy, UK, CERNVELO : 1.25 MCHF MPI Heidelberg (BMBF), NIKHEF, Switzerland (Lausanne), UKDAH : 0.17 MCHF Germany (BMBF + MPG), Italy,

Spain, Switzerland, UK, CERN.

Subdetector Estimate Participating Institutes

DIRECT SUBSYSTEM FUNDING