FY14-16 Strategic Planning PPT - UPDATED for second session
-
Upload
cheryl-precious -
Category
Documents
-
view
49 -
download
1
Transcript of FY14-16 Strategic Planning PPT - UPDATED for second session
FY14-16 STRATEGIC PLANState of the Food Bank
More than 50 million Americans are now food insecure
Growth in U.S. Food Insecurity Rate
1995 - 2011
All U.S.
Househ
olds
Househ
olds w
ith Ki
ds
Black H
ouseh
olds
Hispan
ic Hou
sehold
s
14.9%20.2%
25.1% 26.2%
Percent of House-holds that are Food
Insecure
2
FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 F-cast0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
452 403 364631 784 934
620
858 819 788
816830
730
807
297 308 310
417
554669
824232 278 332
382
464499 507
290 313 360
394
456461 535
Channel lbs by fiscal year
Lbs
(MM
)
Channel
Produce
Purchasing
Retail
Manu
Fed
10
17
18
-3
16
Traditional sources of food at risk and eroding
2,129 2,121 2,154
2,640
3,0883,293 3,293
FY12Growth
%
16
2
23
11
-34%
FY06 – FY11
CAGR%
We expect manufacturing to revert to long-term trend due to industry focus on zero waste. Federal Commodities not expected to increase going forward due strong agricultural commodity markets. 3
One Goal for the Network
4
At the 2012 Network Summit, members were asked to commit symbolically commit to “One Goal”
8.4 billionmeal gap
annually
Reduce the meal gap
by providing
3.63B meals
annually by FY15,
an increase of +1B
meals vs. FY10
What is our commitment?
Reduce the meal gap
5
IncreaseFood
Assistance
How will we reduce the gap?
Decreasethe Needfor Food
Assistance
Our portion of “the gap”FOOD BANK SPECIFIC VARIABLES
The "Meal Gap"1
15,030,361
1/8 of the "Meal Gap"
1,878,795
ONE GOAL MEAL TARGET
6,037,123 OVERALL PERCENT INCREASE 45.18%5-YR COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (2010 TO 2015) 7.74%8-YR COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (2010 TO 2018) 4.77% SNAP CALCULATOR VARIABLES New Apps Approval Rate 66.27%Recert Apps Approval Rate 75.45%Average Benefit $308.00Certification Period (months) 9State Meal Factor $2.41
Projected growth to meet “one goal”
FY14-16 STRATEGIC PLANSurvey Results
SWOT Analysis Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
SWOT: Strengths
SWOT: Strengths
Partnerships
Board
Cause/Mission
Efficiency
Fiscal & Organizational Stability
Programs & Operations
Creativity, Innovation, Adaptability
Brand & Community Support
Staff
2
3
3
4
4
5
6
9
21
Food Finders' Strengths
SWOT: Strengths Sample comments:
“Passionate and driven staff” “PEOPLE!!! - Knowledgeable, caring and
supportive” “Entrenched community awareness and support” “Innovative atmosphere” “financial stability” “Efficiency - we do a whole lot with a little” “Offering opportunities for the public to get
involved” “Expanding programs and outreach as often as
possible”
SWOT: Weaknesses
SWOT: Weaknesses
AgenciesGovernment Barriers
Abilities of StaffPR/Awareness
Internal Processes/StructureStrategic ThinkingLack of Resources
Reaching Outlying CountiesSize of Staff
Community PartnershipsPhysical Space/Location
22
33
4444
55
13
Food Finders' Weaknesses
SWOT: Strengths Sample comments:
“Location, location, location!” “Lack of warehouse space” “Small staff” “No ‘heavy hitters’ [involved in work]” “Flightiness - at times we seem to be jumping from
one project to another without full resolution” “Communication between departments” “low participation and input from outlying counties” “Relationships with Food Pantries & Soup Kitchens
(last place after Back Pack, Summer Feeding, etc)”
Our vision & mission
Current vision: Eliminate hunger. Current mission: Food Finders procures,
stores, and distributes food, together with complementary resources, to serve the needs of hungry people.
What should be our primary focus?
55%
20%
25%
Food Finders should be......making sure there is always enough food assistance for people who need it....reducing the number of people who need food assistance....helping grassroots hunger relief organizations provide food assistance in their communities.
80%
5%
15%
Food Finders is…...making sure there is always enough food assis-tance for people who need it.
…reducing the number of people who need food assistance.
What should be our primary focus?
02468
1012
Food Finders should be working to...
Board
Staff
What best describes our mission?
Answer Choice No. Responses
Hunger relief 18Emergency food 10Awareness 9Low-cost food 8Advocacy 6Partnerships 4Nutrition 3Community Health 1Grassroots 1
How will we know success? Responses generally fit into one of
several themes: We can't end hunger. (4 responses) Agencies stop asking us for food. (8 responses) Clients stop asking us/agencies for food. (7
responses) Supply & capacity meet demand. (4 responses) Clients/local residents no longer show signs of
food insecurity. (4 responses) Community is aware of proper nutrition. (1
response) Government adequately meets need. (1
response)
FY14-16 STRATEGIC PLANSession 2
Katy gave a “State of the Food Bank”
Food insecurity still at an all-time high Perishable food sources increasing Salvage sources decreasing Push from FA to adopt network-wide
“One Goal”FOOD BANK SPECIFIC VARIABLES
The "Meal Gap"1
15,030,361
1/8 of the "Meal Gap"
1,878,795
ONE GOAL MEAL TARGET
6,037,123 OVERALL PERCENT INCREASE 45.18%5-YR COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (2010 TO 2015) 7.74%8-YR COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (2010 TO 2018) 4.77%
We did a SWOT Analysis Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
SWOT: Strengths
Strengths (Survey) Weaknesses (Survey) Staff Brand/Community Support Creativity, innovation, adaptability Programs & operations Fiscal/organizational stability Efficiency Cause/mission Board Partnerships
Physical space/location Community partnerships Size of staff; abilities of staff Reaching outlying counties Lack of resources Strategic thinking Internal processes/structure PR/awareness Government barriers Agencies
Opportunities Threats Raising money Become more visible/raise awareness Improve food given out (produce, etc) Start a pantry that’s open on nights &
weekends More direct service Educate clients Relationships in the community –
reevaluate what we have and what we need
Assess pantries, improve the process for them
Build new friends & advocates through the Cap Campaign, BJB, and other outreach
Analyze community events & food drives for impact
TEFAP $ goes away Staff burnout Lack of campaign funding Slow economic recovery Large “at risk” issue (accidents and liability) Weather-related increases in food costs Government regulations Healthcare costs – to Food Finders and Corporate Depth of staff (in terms of age and experience) Aging volunteers Aging fleet Need for new resources Donor fatigue Client reliance & dependency (on our services) Inability to use some salvage food Competition for products from secondary market Competition from other agencies (Midwest, HDC,
etc)
We discussed this model
Reduce the meal gap
26
IncreaseFood
Assistance
Decreasethe Needfor Food
Assistance
Implications of “one goal” model Education is going to be critical – both of clients and
community Will donors give to help “reduce demand”? Or is
“increasing assistance” a more compelling reason to give?
This concept might actually be more easily embraced by a wide array of people
Challenges the “old” food bank paradigm – that we were created by agencies to serve agencies
Metrics will be more difficult if we focus on education & awareness
We will have to constantly make decisions about how to balance resources between these two focus areas
Feeding America: One Goal Pledge
Copies included in packet
We identified goals
`Assess our capacity needs and build infrastructure to
support our strategic goals.
30
Educate & empower people
to utilize all available food
resources.
Increase people’s access to
nutritious food.
Mobilize the public in the fight
to end hunger.
Reduce the Meal Gap
Goals
Survey results: strategies
Our Programs: Impact vs. Cost
Our Programs: Impact vs. Support
What else should we be doing?
Repackaging more bulk food
Visibility/strengthening brand
Consolidate/coordinate Tippecanoe Co Agencies
Senior food program
Expanding/adding new direct service programs
No answer/nothing
SNAP Outreach
Nutrition & meal planning education
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Top Operational Priorities
Adding more staff
Expanding agency partner capacity
Expanding direct service program capacity
Expanding physical space
42%
42%
53%
95%
Identifying process improvements
21%
More vehicles 16%
More/better equipment 11%
Upgrading technology 11%
Outsourcing some functions 0%
Tools
Estimated Costs/Meal by Program
ESTIMATED COSTS PER MEAL Unit Type Cost Per UnitAvg Meals Per
Unit Cost/Meal Revenue Per Unit Adj Cost/Meal
SNAP Outreach - year 1 1 Assistance session $ 60.00 89 $ 0.67 $ 30.00 $ 0.34
SNAP Outreach - year 2+ 1 Assistance session $ 15.00 89 $ 0.17 $ 7.50 $ 0.08
BackPack Program 1 BackPack $ 4.97 5 $ 0.99 $ 4.20 $ 0.15
Mobile Pantry Program 1 Distribution $ 1,140.00 5,269 $ 0.22 $ 500.00 $ 0.12
Whistlestop Program 1 Distribution $ 300.00 2,226 $ 0.13 $ - $ 0.13
Agencies 1 Agency, annually $ 8,513.29 22,224 $ 0.38 $ 3,405.32 $ 0.23
SFSP 1 Meal $ 6.04 1 $ 6.04 $ 5.41 $ 0.63
Projected growth to meet “one goal”
FIVE-YEAR SCENARIO
Total Pounds5 SNAP Applications5 5-YEAR CAGRMeals converted from Pounds (5-Year
CAGR)Meals Converted from SNAP
Apps (5-Year CAGR) TOTAL MEALS (5-Year CAGR) ONE GOAL MEAL TARGET
FY2010 Actuals 4,989,994 - 4,158,328 - 4,158,328 6,037,123
FY2011 Actuals 5,527,495 - 7.74% 4,606,246 - 4,606,246 6,037,123
FY2012 6,052,602 - 7.74% 5,043,835 - 5,043,835 6,037,123
FY2013 6,521,153 - 7.74% 5,434,294 - 5,434,294 6,037,123
FY2014 7,025,976 - 7.74% 5,854,980 - 5,854,980 6,037,123
FY2015 7,569,879 - 7.74% 6,308,232 - 6,308,232 6,037,123
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
EIGHT-YEAR SCENARIO
Total Pounds5 SNAP Applications5 8-YEAR CAGRMeals converted from Pounds (8-Year
CAGR)Meals Converted from SNAP
Apps (8-Year CAGR) TOTAL MEALS (8-Year CAGR) ONE GOAL MEAL TARGET
FY2010 Actuals 4,989,994 - 4,158,328 - 4,158,328 6,037,123
FY2011 Actuals 5,527,495 - 4.77% 4,606,246 - 4,606,246 6,037,123
FY2012 6,052,602 - 4.77% 5,043,835 - 5,043,835 6,037,123
FY2013 6,341,340 - 4.77% 5,284,450 - 5,284,450 6,037,123
FY2014 6,643,852 - 4.77% 5,536,544 - 5,536,544 6,037,123
FY2015 6,960,796 - 4.77% 5,800,663 - 5,800,663 6,037,123
FY2016 7,292,858 - 4.77% 6,077,382 - 6,077,382 6,037,123
FY2017 7,640,762 - 4.77% 6,367,302 - 6,367,302 6,037,123
FY2018 8,005,263 - 4.77% 6,671,053 - 6,671,053 6,037,123
Environmental Peer Group (EPG) Peach Operation Statistics by Food BankNumber of Food Banks in EPG 34 Combined EPG Ranked in the Network
Detailed Metrics for All Food Banks in EPGEnvironmental Peer Group Variables Size of Service Area (Sq Miles) 6,586 Small
2010 Food Insecure Individuals 87,320 LowFood and Funds Resources in Dollars 12,443,614$ LowCost to Operate Index 94.25 Low
PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK - FY2012 (1)
Food Access ActualChange Over
Last Year Food Bank Percentile within EPG (based on Actuals)Percentile within EPG
Service Area PPIP 71.79 9.2% 44%Percent Foods to Encourage (5) 54.1% -6.9% 29%Average County PPIP 77.20 3.5% 15 44%SNAP Meals N/A 0.0% N/A N/ALocal Pounds 1,311,858.00 17.3% 59%Food Safety Index (4) 1.00 N/A 33%COMPOSITE INDEX 42%
Resource Development ActualChange Over
Last YearPenetration into Individual Giving 18.7% 2.8% 29%Private Support Revenue 821,671.00$ 20.2% 41%Private Support Percent of Operating Expenses 39.4% -4.5% 29%Average Direct Mail Renewal Gift in Dollars (3) 47.40$ N/A 26%Individual Support Percent of Total Fundraising 44.2% -0.2% 38%COMPOSITE INDEX 33%
Organizational Efficiency ActualChange Over
Last YearMeals Per Dollar (2) 4.60 -1.6% 38%Cost Per Dollar Raised 0.18$ -15.0% 62%Program Expenses Percent of Operating Expenses 74.4% 18.7% 24%Inventory Turns 8.28 25.0% 32%COMPOSITE INDEX 39%
Community Mobilization ActualChange Over
Last YearVolunteer Hours 22,775.00 52.0% 82%Number of Individual Donors per 1,000 Population 13.28 123.0% 26%Food Drive Pounds 203,512.00 22.0% 76%Advocacy Index (3) 1.14 N/A 35%COMPOSITE INDEX 55%
IN-Lafayette (Food Finders Food Bank) - Peach <-- Select Food Bank