Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

48
1

Transcript of Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

Page 1: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 1/48

1

Page 2: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 2/48

Capital budgeting and Investment Criteria

Topic cover

2

Capital budgeting/investment decision

Net present value (NPV)

Internal rate of return (IRR)

Payback period (PP); Discount payback period(DPP)

Profitability index (PI)

Equivalent annual cost/annuity (EAC/EAA)

Page 3: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 3/48

CFO DECISION TOOLS

3

Profitability

Index, 12%

Payback, 57%

IRR, 76%

NPV, 75%

Book rate of

return, 20%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Survey Data on CFO Use of Investment Evaluation Techniques

SOURCE: Graham and Harvey, “The Theory and Practice of Finance: Evidence

from the Field,” Journal of Financial Economics 61 (2001), pp. 187-243.

Page 4: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 4/48

4

WHAT IS CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISION?

The process of identifying,analyzing, and selecting investmentprojects whose returns (cash flows)are expected to extend beyond oneyear.

Capital budgeting/investmentdecision is the central to the

success of any firm

Page 5: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 5/48

5

PROCESS OF CAPITAL BUDGETING DECISION

Make decision of Accept  or Reject  a project 

1. Identify promising/potential projects 

2. Estimate cash flows of promising projects 

3. Choose method to evaluate NPV, IRR, PP,etc.

Page 6: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 6/48

PROJECT CLASSIFICATIONS

•  Analyzing project investment is not costless, depend, so thelevel of details should depend on certain types of projects:

• Replacement: to continue current operation or to reduce

cost• Expansion of existing products or markets

• New products

• Safety  and environment projects

• Research and development•  Exploration

• Others

6

Page 7: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 7/48

Mutually Exclusive vs. Independent Project

7

• only one of several potential projectscan be chosen, e.g. acquiring anaccounting system.

• =>RANK all alternatives and select the

best one.

MutuallyExclusiveProjects:

•  More than one promising projects

can be chosen: accepting or rejectingone project does not affect thedecision of the other projects

• => RANK all and choose good ones 

IndependentProjects:

Page 8: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 8/48

NET PRESENT VALUE NPV)

NPV: Present value of future cash flows minus initial

investments. 

Where:

C0 : Initial InvestmentCt : Cash Flow at time tt : time period of the investmentr : “opportunity cost of capital”: Expected rate of return given up by investing in a

project

***The Cash Flow could be po sit ive or negative at any t ime per iod

8

 NPV C   C 

0

1

1

2

21 1 1( ) ( )...

( )

Page 9: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 9/48

CalculatingNPV?

1. Estimate initial costs 

2. Estimate future cashflows: how much? and

when? 

3. Estimate discount rate

9

NET PRESENT VALUE NPV) Cont.)

Page 10: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 10/48

 

• NPV Rule: Accept all projects with a positive NPV  =>increase shareholders wealth

Example

Suppose we can invest $50 today and receive $60 in one year.What is our increase in value given a 10% expected return?  

10

Profit = -50 +  60

1.10

 $4.55

Initial Investment

 Added Value

$50

$4.55

NPV Cont.)

Page 11: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 11/48

 

Example

You have the opportunity to purchasean office building. You have a tenant

lined up that will generate $16,000 per year in cash flows for three years. Atthe end of three years you anticipateselling the building for $450,000.

 Assume opportunity cost is 7%. Howmuch would you be willing to pay forthe building?

11

NPV Cont.)

Page 12: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 12/48

If the building is being offered for sale at a price of $350,000, would you buy the building and what isthe added value generated by your purchase andmanagement of the building?   12

0 1 2 3Present Value 

14,953

14,953

380,395

$409,323

$16,000 $16,000$16,000

$450,000

$466,000

NPV Cont.)

Page 13: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 13/48

13

Ranking Criteria 

From the highest NPV 

Minimum Acceptance Criteria 

Accept if NPV >0

NPV Cont.)

Page 14: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 14/48

 

14

Disadvantages: Advantages:

NPV Cont.)

Page 15: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 15/48

INTERNAL RATE of RETURN IRR)

• IRR : discount rate at which NPV = 0 

• IRR method: select all projects that have an internal rateof return greater than opportunity cost of capital.

15

0

)1(

...

)1()1(  2

2

1

10  

 IRR

 IRR

 IRR

C C  NPV 

Page 16: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 16/48

16

You can purchase a building for $350,000. The investment willgenerate $16,000 in cash flows (i.e. rent) during the first three years. Atthe end of three years you will sell the building for $450,000. What is theIRR on this investment?

0 350 000  16 000

1

16 000

1

466 000

1

1 2 3

,  ,

( )

,

( )

,

( ) IR R IR R IR R

IRR = 12.96%

Calculating IRR by using a spreadsheet

 Year Cash Flow Formula

0 (350,000.00) IRR = 12.96% =IRR(B3:B7)

1 16,000.00 

2 16,000.00 

3 466,000.00 

IRR Cont.)

Page 17: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 17/48

17

Ranking Criteria 

Choose the highest IRR  

Minimum Acceptance Criteria 

Accept if IRR > required rate of return 

IRR Cont.)

Page 18: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 18/48

IRR Vs. NPV

Co C1 C2  C3  IRR NPV@7%

Project A -350 16 16 466 12.96% ??

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Discount rate (%)

   N   P   V    ( ,

   0   0   0   s   )

18

IRR=12.96%

NPV and IRR will generally give the same decision.

Page 19: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 19/48

19

• NPV and IRR will generally give the same decision,exceptions:

– Non-conventional cash flows – cash flow signs

change more than once

– Mutually exclusive projects• Initial investments are substantially different

• Timing of cash flows is substantially different

IRR Vs. NPV (Cont)

Page 20: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 20/48

20

Problemswith IRR

1. MultipleIRRs 

2. Are WeBorrowingor

Lending?? 

3. The ScaleProblem 

4. TheTimingProblem 

IRR (Cont.)

Page 21: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 21/48

Problem with IRR Cont.)

• Pitfall 1: Multiple rate of return

Conventional cash flow: cash flow signs change only once time=>only one IRR 

Unconventional cash flow: cash flow signs change more than once =>

multiple rate of return.

21

15121260

............10910

  C C C C 

 

050018002000-C

018005002000-B

50005005002000-A

CCCCProject 3210

Page 22: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 22/48

22

• The following cash flow generates NPV=0 at both IRR% of

(-44%) and +11.6%.

15121260

............10910

  C C C C 

 600 NPV

300

0

-30

-600

Discount Rate

IRR=11.6%

IRR=-44%

Which IRR shouldwe use?

Problem with IRR Cont.)

Page 23: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 23/48

23

• There are two IRRs for this project: IRR1 = 0%; IRR2 = 100%

($100.00)

($50.00)

$0.00

$50.00

$100.00

-50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200%Discount rate

       N       P       V

0 1 2 3

$200 $800

-$200

- $800

Which one should

we use?

Problem with IRR Cont.)

Page 24: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 24/48

• Pitfall 2: Borrowing or lending project:

• IRR > opportunity cost of capital (10%), but should accept project

B?

24

364%50500,1000,1364%50500,1000,1

%10@Project 10

 B

 A

 NPV  IRRC C 

Problem with IRR Cont.)

Page 25: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 25/48

25

• Pitfall 3: The Scale Problem 

• Would you rather make 100% or 50% on your

investments?

• What if the 100% return is on a $1 investment,

while the 50% return is on a $1,000

investment?

Problem with IRR Cont.)

Page 26: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 26/48

• Pitfall 3: The Scale Problem (Cont.) 

Which o f the two p rojects should the f i rm accept?

Reason: IRR ignore project scale

26

818,11%75000,30000,20

182,8%100000,20000,10

%10@Project 10

 E 

 D

 NPV   IRRC C   

NPV method:accept project E

IRR method:accept project D

Problem with IRR Cont.)

Page 27: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 27/48

• Pitfall 4: The Timing Problem 

The fo l lowing two pro jects i l lustrate th is p roblem

Examp le: two propo sals w i th cash f low as fo l lowing table:

Project Co C1 C2  C3  IRR NPV @7%

Project A -350 400 14.29%  $24 

Project B -350 16 16 466 12.96%  $59 

27

NPV method:accept project B

IRR method:accept project A

Problem with IRR Cont.)

Page 28: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 28/48

 

28

50

40

30

2010

0

-10

-20

   N   P   V   $

 ,   1 ,   0

   0   0  s

Discount rate, %

8 10 12 14 16

IRR= 14.29%IRR= 12.96%

IRR= 12.26%

Crossover point

IRR Vs. NPV (Cont)

A

B

IRR method: always choose B

NPV method: choose A or B depend on discount rate

Page 29: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 29/48

Summary of Internal Rate of Return IRR) 

29

 Advantages: Disadvantages:

Page 30: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 30/48

Payback Period PP) 

30

Payback period (PP) 

How long does it take the project to “pay

back” its initial investment? 

Payback Period = number of years to recoverinitial costs

only accept projects that “payback” in the desiredtime frame (cutoff period)

Page 31: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 31/48

31

Example

Examine the three projects and note the mistake wewould make if we insisted on only taking projects with a payback period of 2 years or less. 

502050018002000-C

58-2018005002000-B

2,624350005005002000-A

10%@ NPV

Period

Payback CCCCProject 3210

 

NPV method:accept project

A&C

PP method:accept project

B&C

PP vs. NPV 

Page 32: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 32/48

Payback Period PP) Cont.)

• Minimum Acceptance Criteria: set by management

Ranking Criteria: set by management

32

• Ignores the time value of money • Ignores cash flows after the payback period

• Biased against long-term projects

• Requires an arbitrary acceptance criteria

• A project accepted based on the payback criteria may not have a positive NPV

Disadvantages: 

• Easy to understand • Biased toward liquidity

Advantages: 

Page 33: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 33/48

Discounted Payback Period DPP) 

33

Discounted Paybackperiod (DPP) 

How long does it take the project to “pay back” its initial

investment taking the time value of money  into account?

DPP method: a project accepted if the time of recovering

initial investment on the discounted basic equal or less than

specified number of years.

Page 34: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 34/48

 

34

• DPP consider time value of money

 Advanced compared to PP::

• Still ignore any cash flows after payback period

• Biased against long-term projects• Requires an arbitrary acceptance criteria

•  A project accepted based on the payback criteria may nothave a positive NPV

Disadvantage:

DPP Cont.) 

Page 35: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 35/48

The Profitability Index PI) Rule

35

We cannot  use NVP method to rank projects.

What happen if firm faces the capital rationing?

Capital Rationing - Limitset on the amount of funds

available for investment.

Soft Rationing - Limits onavailable funds imposed by

management.

Hard Rationing - Limits onavailable funds imposed bythe unavailability of funds

in the capital market.

Page 36: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 36/48

36

Example  

We only have $300,000 to invest. Which do we select? 

Proj NPV Investment PI

 A 230,000 200,000 1.15B 141,250 125,000 1.13

C 194,250 175,000 1.11

D 162,000 150,000 1.08

727,500 650,000

Based on NPV, we choose al l but we do no t have enough

capital

InvestentInitial

 NPVPI  

The Profitability Index PI) Rule Cont.)

Page 37: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 37/48

37

Examp le - cont inu ed  Proj NPV Investment PI

 A 230,000 200,000 1.15

B 141,250 125,000 1.13

C 194,250 175,000 1.11

D 162,000 150,000 1.08

Select projects with highest Weighted Avg PI

WAPI (B&D projects) = 1.13(125) + 1.08(150) + 0.0 (25)

(300) (300) (300)= 1.01

The Profitability Index PI) Rule Cont.)

Page 38: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 38/48

38

Examp le - continued  Proj NPV Investment PI

 A 230,000 200,000 1.15

B 141,250 125,000 1.13

C 194,250 175,000 1.11D 162,000 150,000 1.08

Select projects with highest Weighted Avg PI

WAPI (B&D projects) = 1.01WAPI (A project) = 0.77

WAPI (B&C projects) = 1.12 

The Profitability Index PI) Rule Cont.)

Page 39: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 39/48

39

Minimum Acceptance Criteria: Accept if PI > 0

Ranking Criteria:Select alternative with highest PI

Disadvantages:Problems with mutually exclusive investments

Advantages:May be useful when available investment funds are limitedEasy to understand and communicateCorrect decision when evaluating independent projects

The Profitability Index PI) Rule Cont.)

Page 40: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 40/48

Equivalent Annual Annuity EAA)

•  What happen if firm have two unequal projects?

• Equivalent Annual annuity/Cost (EAA/EAC) - Thecash flow per period with the same present value asthe cost of buying and operating a machine.

40

Page 41: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 41/48

Example

Given the following costs of operating two machinesand a 6% cost of capital, select the lower  costmachine using equivalent annual annuity method.

Year

Mach. 1 2 3 4 PV@6% E.A.A.

F -15 -4 -4 -4G -10 -6 -6

41

-25.69-21.00

- 9.61-11.45

Equivalent Annual Annuity EAA) Cont.)

Page 42: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 42/48

Example (with a twist)Select one of the two following projects, based onhighest  “equivalent annual annuity” (r=9%). 

42

4.107.81.820 

2.69.52.59.415 

Project 43210

 B

 A

 EAA NPV C C C C C 

2.82

2.78

.87

1.10

Equivalent Annual Annuity EAA) Cont.)

Page 43: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 43/48

Conclusion

43

Guiding principles for criteria:

• Depend on cash flow, not accounting profit

• Consistent with the goal of maximizing shareholders wealth

• Consider time value of money

•  Account for the risk of the project

E l f I t t R l

Page 44: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 44/48

Example of Investment Rules 

44

Compute the IRR, NPV, PI, and payback period for the

following two projects. Assume the required return is 10%.

Year Project A Project B

0 -$200 -$150

1 $200 $50

2 $800 $100

3 -$800 $150

Page 45: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 45/48

Example of Investment Rules (Cont.) 

45

Project A Project B

CF0  -$200.00 -$150.00PV0 of CF1-3  $241.92 $240.80

NPV = $41.92 $90.80

IRR = 0%, 100% 36.19%

PI = 1.2096 1.6053

Page 46: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 46/48

Project A Project B ($200) 

($100) 

$0 

$100 

$200 

$300 

$400 

-15%  0%  15%  30%  45%  70%  100%  130%  160%  190% 

Discount rates 

   N   P   V 

IRR 1(A)  IRR (B)  IRR 2(A)

Cross-over Rate 

Example of Investment Rules (Cont.) 

Page 47: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 47/48

 

47

PI 12%

Book rate of

return 20%

Payback 57%

IRR 76%

NPV 75%

0 20 40 60 80 100

%Survey evidence on the percentage or CFOs who always, or almost always, use a particular technique forevaluating investment projects

Source: Reprinted from J. R. Graham and C. R. Harvey, “The Theory and Practice of Finance from the field,”

Journal of Financial Economics 61 (2001), pp. 187 – 243,©2001 with permission from Elsevier Science.

why in real life managers

still use PP method as wellIRR?

Page 48: Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

8/22/2019 Fund.finance Lecture 5 Investment Decision 2012

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fundfinance-lecture-5-investment-decision-2012 48/48

 

48

why in real life managers

still use PP method as wellIRR?